Added: 5 years ago
From: tribun79
Views: 33,634
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (130)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Schumacher could of had 100 victories if he was more selfless, gave Barrichello a number of victories in the ferrari reign in 2002 and 2004. But Senna will always be the greatest.

  • Senna 10 years of formula 65 achieved a pole position, Schumacher in 20 years has 68 pole positions!, Schumacher is the Greatest!, But Senna is the Best!

  • Schumacher could have 1000 victories, but Senna will always be the best driver of all time!

  • best driver should drive the best car

  • 91 victories thanks to R.B x3

    Ross Brawn

    Rory Byrne

    Rubens Barrichello

    Cheatmacher is overated

  • hopefully we'll celebrate no.92 this year...

  • Schumacher has twice as many victories and WC as Senna. It's funny how some people dare to say that Senna actually was better. Senna was in the league of Prost; they were two great drivers, legends to the sport. But Schumacher was simply in a league of his own. Looking forward to see him back to winning ways in 2011 :-)

  • At 1:48 there is "Italy 1995", but this is "Italy 1996". ;-)

    In 1995 Herbert won in Monza

  • whats the first song?

  • @Helvs1990 ..think its Dances whit wolf

  • nice video

  • great video, added it to my favourites...

    i wonder if shumacher can nail another one some time during his comeback, he has 3 years remember...

  • at the age of 34 senna had 3 WCC`s schumacher 6.. ;)

  • and at age of 34 mallamoozoo still crys like a little baby that senna is dead hahahaha

  • mallamoozoo....you are an illiterate ghetto-dwelling WETBACK, and should focus your sports interest on soccer and other proletarier sports, since F1 is too complex for a WETBACK/SPIC imbecile like you...Welcome to REALITY your stinking SPIC!!!! Senna was made a hero because of his untimely death, and not because his mediocre achievements on the race track!!!

  • Um - ive driven an F1 car you tool - what have you done LOL

  • haha mallamoozoo, to see this video must be for you like "every win of schumachers 91 wins must hurt like a needle-prick" hahahaha

  • @BarneveldDarts

    Not at all - most of them were gifts from Ross Brawn and Rory Byrne - nothing to be proud of at all.

     I'm more impressed by Senna's 65 poles in just 160 GP - 40% strike rate.

    HAAAHAHA

  • ohh, it seems that you are a bit jealous of schumacher achievements? but dont worry millions of people hate schumacher, becuase he was/is so damn sucessfull!

  • oh yes, and your "magic" senna only converted 65 poles (with the help of his super-dominent cars from 87-91) into 41 wins, because his speed was not very constantly. he had so a super car but could only drive fast for 1 lap. pfff that shows sennas lack of talent lol.

    senna=totally overrated!

  • @BarneveldDarts

    "ONLY"? 41wins is the 3rd highest total ever - despite Senna having only the 16th highest number of starts. Only Prost and Schu won more with a MASSIVE 40 and 90 more starts!

    And furthermore - Senna had so many mechanical failures whilst leading that accounts for the difference between his poles and wins - with cars as reliable as Schui's 21st century tecnologically advanced ferrari's - he would have won just as many races as he won poles.

    So your rationale is BULLSHIT!

  • @mallamoozoo

    Your argument is backwards - according to you, Senna would be a better driver if he'd won his 41 races from just 41 poles - so the fact that he got 65 poles (40% strikerate) instead of 41poles (27% strikerate) is a negative achievement.?

    So the extra 24 poles, in your mind, is a failure?

    OMG - You are an intellectual imbecile!

  • no you psycho!! i never said that!but if senna was so "unbelievable good" how you believe, then he should have won 65 races out of 65 pole positions!! but he didnt, because he could drive mainly fast only for 1 lap! senna had all the time the most dominent car but his unconstantly driving and human failure and average driving skill didnt allowed senna to win more then 41 races!! if schumacher had sennas mclaren car then he would had 100 poles and probably 130 wins on his name!!!!

  • and to complete the whole thing, see it this way:

    give schumacher the best car and he dominates f1 5 years and win nearly every race (that shows how good he was).

    so give senna the best car he never dominated as schumacher did! do you see the difference?

    schumacher+best car=pure dominace

    senna+best car= competetive driver, but beatable

    so you see schumi is the most skilled and complete driver f1 has ever seen, and senna def. NOT! facst facts facts my friend....

  • senna has a winning stike-rate only 25% and schumacher 36%!!!! so there is no ARGUMENT THAT SCHUMACHER was a far better winner then senna, believe it or not!!

    and senna mada more human failures then prost and schumacher!! and thats a fact too my friend! so he was never a more constant and complete driver then prost and schumi! and ok prost had 50 technical failures in 199 races and senna 53 in 161 races, but most of that is caused of sennas driving-style!!

  • WTF?

    "Senna could drive fast for just 1 lap"

    WTF?!!!

    Did you watch Australia 93?

    -Senna pounded the streets for 82 laps- 2 hours of relentless pace that blew Prost in the superior Williams out of the paddock!

    Senna was every bit as superior in races as he was in quali- when the car didnt break Senna was there at the end!.

    It's only mechanical failure that dropped his win score from 65 to 41. With Schu's cars' reliability, he'd have 40% wins AND poles!

    Senna was fastest AND most complete!

  • why are you spewing crap about senna?

    senna had 2 dominant cars in his career, even 1990 is questionable and the 1991 williams was so quick you couldn't see which way it went...

    and how was the 87 lotus a super "dominent" car? it had a flimsy chassis and a suspension system which was hard to set up... look what nelson piquet (a triple world champion) achieved in virtually the same car in 1988!

    you clearly have such an insufferable bias against senna...

  • Senna was hopelessly behind by thirty points---while driving a TECHNICALLY SUPERIOR CAR---when that Brazilian shithead kicked the bucket. He is dead and rotten by now. Senna was not even a RACER, but just a superb qualifier, who converted 65 poles into only 41 victories and 19 fatest race laps, while Schumi took 68 poles, and converted them into 91 victories (and soon more), as well as over 70 fastest race laps. At age 34, Schumi had 6 F1 titles, while Senna won only 3 with DOMINANT EQUIPMENT

  • I already schooled you on that elsewhere-

    I told you what you meant to say- that Schui was so slow he could only get poles 27% of starts- meaning 25% of his 91 wins were inherited by other's misfortunes when he wasnt even fast enough to get pole. In contrast Senna was so fast he got pole 40% of the time and only mechanical failure cost him as many race wins.

    But you never answered this- you've just started it again here- well I'll follow you around and make you look like a fool everywhere LOL

  • Senna was a also better racer than Schu, not just a better qualifier (but yes his qualifying was indeed in a different universe to Schu's mediocre skills at driving ULTRA fast.)

    We all know that schu race stats are artificially enhanced by 21st century technological reliabilty- Senna (and others) were hampered by regular mechanical failures in the primitive 20th century cars).

    Thats why we look at poles- a much truer indicator of talent- and we see Senna 50% better strikerate than Schu.

    OWNED

  • At the 8 year mark - Senna had 3 world Titles, Schu only 2. So had Schu been killed at Silverstone 99 - he would ranked somewhere around Alonso's level - maybe not even top 10. Further evidence his stats are artificially enhanced by the sheer length of his career - not the quality of it.

    OWNED AGAIN !

  • Schui owes it all to Senna's death - had Senna not suffered that appalling snapped steering column - Senna would have 7 WC - and Schui would have been killed at Silverstone 99 (because they wouldnt have learnt the lesson about tyre barriers in front of concrete walls) so Schui would be a driver with ZERO WC

  • @mallamoozoo

    You are just a jealous WETBACK who has never achieved anything in your miserable life as a THIRD-WORLD ghetto laborer. Not in sports, and definitely not in the exquisite world of ACADEMIA, in which yours truly is calling the shots. You need to apologize to me for having been born---as a son of a wetback hooker and her ghetto-dwelling pimp---and for attempting to pollute my divine academic aura. Senna is a dead piece of THIRD WORLD RUBBISH....We should stop feeding these MONGRELS

  • WAAAAHAHHAAA - ROFL!

    'Divine aura"

    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ROFLCOPTER!

  • The Best!

  • @synyster towers:

    the comparison with senna i can come with he was also a legend..

    but you say alonso is better, get real, look at michaels achievements he did it in all sorts of surcumstances

  • Schumacher and the score to Dances with Wolves, this is the most epic video I've seen on youtube.

  • The legend :-)

  • I think that Senna and Alonso are better

  • USA 2005 is the best

    LMAO :D

  • Impressive!

  • vielleicht muss ich bald das video erweitern:-)

  • Spa 2009

    Monza 2009

    please god!

  • on route for 92 ????

  • I really wouldn't be surprised if he gets 93-94 wins.

  • Lol Kimi in 2002 Australia picture :D

  • I know, he's smiling, fucking hell!

  • the miserable git never smiles! its a miracle!

  • I agree with jmcgrth. You're right buddy! ;)

  • SCHUMI THE BEST!!! he has left formula 1 early.........he would have won more championships!!!

  • we know that now, but schumi chose to retire on top

  • 2002 Austria wasnt a true victory it was Barrichellos win

  • He gave it back to Barrichello at Indianapolis later that year though.

  • you seem to be forgetting united states that year...

  • @Daniel0889 True, although USA 2002 was Schumacher's win.

  • hahah lol das video hört garnicht mehr auf. der hat so oft gewonnen

  • This video really sums up what Scumacher achieved. Its amazing really. No one can be that lucky as some suggest. The senna, shumacher debate is simply a matter of opinion. They were both quicker than the guys they raced against, and both did some silly things. I love them both. Great video by the way.

  • shut up moron

  • A brilliant tribute to a brilliant driver and a good man. We miss you Michael!

  • mansell's Ferrari was NOT as good as Prost's in 1990

  • incidentally what is the music playing? that first track sums up michael perfectly, i think

  • the most complete race car driver ever

  • i think you need to look up wikipedia for your info again.first of all ''Senna would have re-written the record books far more completely than Schui.'' i thought stats were ''nothing''.(not mentioning the fact that schumacher broke almost all records so it would be impossible to do it more completely than him.heres for the fun bit you dont learn on wikipedia,when schumacher came to ferrari the reliability was atrocious(gearbox mainly),michael is given alot of credit for turning reliabilty around

  • You just dont get it do you! All u Schui fans are limited to thinking "Scui improved the gearbox". It just proves you have absolutely sweet fuck all idea what a racing driver really is job is - it's DRIVING FAST! AND SENNA WAS THE FASTEST EVER!

  • maybe a racing driver in nascar or some rubbish like that is just about speed,F1 is a mixture of speed and tactics.schumachers records prove he was the fastest and hes well known to be the king of tactics.even james allen ,who absolutely despises schumacher,would say he was a master tactician.he was well known for knowing every little bit of goings on in the garage.Its ridiculous to say its just about speed,you need to know whats going on inside the car and change your tactics to suit

  • the thing people like you fail to appreciate is that it is possible for people to hero worship both Senna and Schumi.

    I was devastated when Senna died and considered stopping watching F1 but I continued because Ayrton would have wanted me to

    he also would have wanted me to choose a new favourite, and in 1999 when my grieving was done, i choose schumi.

  • nope, the driver's job is to cross the finish line first and michael did it more than senna did

  • Watch;

    "The Greatest 100 Racing Drivers of All Time"

    Game Over!

  • not so, my opinion stands as stated, is stubborn and schumi haters like yourself face a futile fight to get me to change my mind.

    i respect your opinion that senna was the best, so instead of wasting energy on pouring bile on forums like this, why not do something positive and wax lyrical about how good senna was (extremely good in my opinion) on the many senna tributes and leave us alone?

  • Since you want to use Wikipedia as a reference - i got one for ya, punk!

    "Benetton Formula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"

    "After 1995, Schumacher moved to Ferrari along with Ross Brawn, Nigel Stepney, Rory Byrne and 11 other key figures from his two championship winning seasons with Benetton. From this point, the Benetton team was never what it once was."

    So ferrari's revival was nothing to do with Schumacher you idiot - it was 11 key engineering staff - start getting educated!

  • No wait - 14, FOURTEEN !,

    FOUR - FUCKING - TEEN key engineering staff went to F

    ferrari with schui - HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAA - blows your peurile little Boy's Own fantasy out the window doesn't it - "Schui improved engineering reliability" -my fuckin ass! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ROFL COPTER!

  • even anti schumacher people admit that schumacher was a massive presence in the garage.your blinded by your love for someone who won far less than schumacher,thats just the facts all you have is opinion.you my friend have been owned.and i followed schumacher from bennaton so dont talk down to me.people say senna was the best because what he couldv won,im saying schumacher is the best because of what he actually won.FACT

  • You have a mistake here...at 2:27 its not Italy but France 97 At Monza 98,it was Schumi from Irvine and Ralf

  • schumi had 2 share his best car with massa and barrichelo and they havent won much

  • and herbet...

  • if schummi had the best car then r u telling us that if you put a shitty driver like monteiro in aferrari they would win 7 championships-hardly- schummi used his genius to develop that car and he should have won more

  • i cud go on al day about how many timz schuey had 2 drive d wheels of d car 2 win a race, take hungary 98 as an example! n if ur so adament dat he was always in d best car tell me how hakkinen started winning races overnight?? he went from practicly nowhere in 97 2 d world title n 98!! d mclaren was so good 4 a couple of years dat evn coulthard was able to beat schumacher sometimes!! senna was class no doubt bt hes not even in the same league as schumacher! Dya know why? coz nobody ever was....

  • schumi

  • c´mon you´re dreaming

  • xvitaAA i totally agree with you.but my point is that all these great statistics of michael are not only due to his talent,but also due to absolute(sometimes)lack of competition.and allow me to remind you that 95 title was one of michael's easiest

  • well michael had the best car in 1995 season, but I think Hill also made too many mistakes that prevent him hunt for the world championship. I would compare the 1995 wiliams and beneton to ferrari williams in 1997.

  • I like the Monaco 1997 pic, Eddie Irvine's natural arrogance has gon completly to be replaced by sheer awe and admiration

  • Schumacher didn't have the best car in 95. Herbert (a veteran driving the B195) finished the 1995 championship behind Hill and Coulthard. Williams was clearly the best in 94 and 95. When Schumacher left Benetton, the team even powered by Renault returned to 3rd in the championship.

  • Please do something similar with others great champions! With the drivers who were retired and won at least two championships!

  • yeah, his 1000000 victories prove that he's by the far the best f1 driver ever....when will u wake up,94 95 2001 2002 2004 he had no competition whatsoever!!!!!one of the best,sure,but definitely ot the best

  • 1994, 1995 - Damon Hill. Williams-Renault was very competitive. I agree that 2001, 02 and 04 he won quite easily cause he had the best car.

    But why did he have the best car? Because they were working so hard, testing all the time, improving things that seemed to be perfect. Schumi made ferari the best. So he deserved it, he´s not like Jacques Villeneuve who just joined Williams and got the best car.

  • errors: in italy 96 says 95

    is "ARGENTINA", no "AGENTINA" but good compilation

  • this mallamoozoo fella is goin around to all the schumacher vids leavin comments,listen you think senna was the best,the fact is we weill never know.the only thing we know is schumacher was statistically the best.and so what if he went to a big team,as far as i know f1 drivers and all sportsmen do it for themselves not some dope who acts like he knows everything

  • As for Senna i respesct the fact that you love him as we all do but the fact is that we didn't get the chance to see both schumi and him duel as much unfortunately, but we should give them both the credit for making the sport as interesting as it is now. just keep in mind the mental effort to be allways on top successively and the pressure what is over you all the time if you were in shumi's shoe, you think you can handle something like that. sertainly he is a great one if not the greatest.

  • "Equal Best"? Nope - the ONLY Best was way way out on his own - The Senna: Most talented ever! Highest commitment ever! Fastest qualifier ever (by light years!) Best rain-master ever! Best test-driver ever! Best street-master ever! Least mistakes! What the hell else do you want! There's not a single fucking thing Schui did as well as Senna! (except get contracts with team-orders giving him exclusive rights to the best car - pathetic sportsmanship!)
  • "There's not a single fucking thing Schui did as well as Senna". No, perhaps not, but there were MANY THINGS SCHUMI DID BETTER. He won many more races, no driver in the history of the sport is near him. He has the most poles. The most championsshippoints. And least but not least; the most world championships. 7!!! Thats more than twice as much as Senna. But unlike you I respect Senna, and I consider him as one of many greats in F1 history. But Schumacher was better. Sorry.

  • To Schumi hater.

    you hate him with passion not with your mind.

    the fact that schumi was competing for the championship through out his whole carreer is a clear proof that he made it happen not team order, not lack of competition, and sertainly not luck. Infact he should have won 98 and 99 seasons as well.

  • Fantastic memories. Thank you Michael!

  • gattlooosemem guy jus get fucked this a vid for his true fans not twats lik you

  • It's a shame he cheated his way in 1994.

  • FORZA SCHUMACHER

    FORZA FERRARI

    please watch, comment and rate my videos please

  • schumacher miss him on the track he's the best great vid.

  • Super Video ! Keep up the good work ;)

  • Faboulous video !!

    Thank you !!

  • I did have another idea for a Michael vid while I was watching this. All his fastest laps. Too long for YouTube though plus you wouldn't have the necessary footage

  • what? at the approximately 14 million fastest laps Schumacher achieved, we'd need the vid to go on for months!

    before you start mallamazoo I AM JOKING

  • King Of All Kings!

  • there isn't hungary 2001... :)

  • lol oh there is it

  • Ok, I only forgot it ;)

  • :-)

  • Nah u have missed the point. Sportsfans always debate the greats. Boxing fans compare Ali, Tyson, Marciano, etc. Yes we all know they are both way above the rest of us - we r debating because it's interesting to compare and contrast the elite. I realize Schumacher is one of the 10 greatest drivers the human species has produced - but I'm more interested in why he wasn't as good as the number 1 - Senna. (My videos explain why.)

  • Senna perished too early :(

  • Schumacher was by far the best.

  • Wow! Excellent vid. In my opinion, Senna and Schumi are the greatest drivers in F1. They gave emotion with their wins. Senna and Schumi: I miss you so much...

  • The music and the photos make this so epic and awesome. Win.

  • Keep playing your video games dumbass. Why don't you try working on your spelling too.

  • wow, another internet troll. somebody ban this retarded fuck.

  • Good idea. Like it very much. Schumi IS the greatest, ever. Melbourne was empty without him this year.

  • always the best!

  • anyone knows the name of both songs?

  • the ten tenors - heres to the heroes

    the ten tenors - il gladiatore

  • Ehi tribun79, you've done a great video. Why don't you do another video like this about Senna, Prost and other world champions of the past?

  • Excellent... We ll miss u schu!

  • I sure won't... good riddance!

  • You slut, go back to the rock you crawled from under.

  • fuck you shit face michael was the greatest there was and he is the greatest there will ever be.. I will miss you michael so long and god bless you mate..

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more