@toxicmegacolon they are less than 10k, probably only like 5k for a university lab. that isn't much. Do you know how much we spend on just chemicals every month? Science isn't cheap.
The only thing I don't like about too much automation (although I do note that that thing really is amazing) is the fact that, computing for the concentration using spec is what all students are taught, and for some reason, automating the process could make the operator's brains to rot... Ahaha. I'm just old school that way.
You won't believe this but my lecturer actually showed it during our lecture. Now that's awesome :D of course we had a hearty laugh at the final scene! Teehee!
Wait a minute... if it's accurate to "2 nanograms per microliter", why is he reporting a "76.4 nanograms per microliter"? The decimal isn't significant at all!
We have one at work and when measuring different samples from the same source the results vary considerably... we've gone back to the old way... waste of money
the ratio 260/230 must be > than 2. it assess the presence of contaminants wich absorbs in 230nm
carbohydrates and phenol all have absorbance near 230 nm. The TRIzol reagent (for RNA extraction) is a phenolic solution which absorbs in the UV both at 230 nm and ~270 nm
very bad intro should have started with potential benifits vs bad aspects informally, then the rst but by the end i had no doubt of the massive superiorty of the nano dohicky and if i had or worked in a lab i'd pay the price for acuracy and time saving and enhanced modes of use
You live the way you live due to scientists, so I don't see how you can have too much science. (Science literally means knowledge, and who the fuck want to be ignorant?).
Love this video! Now that NanoDrop is part of Thermo Fisher their 2nd gen products should be very interesting. I've seen their high throughput model, but not played with it yet. This model in the video was a real game changer though.
those "no life" dudes make sure you don't die next time you wind up in a hospital. Anyways, it's a much more productive way of spending time than watching promoted videos on YouTube
This seems way easier than the spectrophotometer we use. What's the catch. I see below it says it only cost around 5500 which is what we paid for ours.
we are using this type in our lab and its pretty easy and smart. we have good practise with RNAs but we are not successful with Lowrys. does anybody know how to measure proteins on this?
sponsored by NanoDrop! No way! What you fail to mention is that 1 µL is not usually a suffiencient volume and the Nanodrop tends to need 2 µL to teake real measurements. Although all of the advertising material says 1 µL will do. Jibbed! Nevertheless our NanoDrop has been nominates for the greatest timesaving device in our department.
stupid tung clicks
alexcastillo22 5 months ago
hahahahahahhaahahhaa... the ending tune
ThePatrickb33 9 months ago
awesome :D
christoph06BERLIN 10 months ago
It's great if you can nanodrop $100,000 on a spectrophotometer.
toxicmegacolon 10 months ago 6
@toxicmegacolon they are less than 10k, probably only like 5k for a university lab. that isn't much. Do you know how much we spend on just chemicals every month? Science isn't cheap.
cbernier3 4 months ago
nerds
buuuuhahaha 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
#
"post two papers to Nature! in 20 minutes...some kind of genius
livking 1 year ago 20"
Who said they got accepted or even past review :-)
with 2 papers in 20 minutes his literature was probably mickey mouse :-)
still 20 min is at least good for a coffee....
FranzEhr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@livking Who said they got accepted or even past review :-)
with 2 papers in 20 minutes his literature was probably mickey mouse :-)
still 20 min is at least good for a coffee....
FranzEhr 1 year ago
The only thing I don't like about too much automation (although I do note that that thing really is amazing) is the fact that, computing for the concentration using spec is what all students are taught, and for some reason, automating the process could make the operator's brains to rot... Ahaha. I'm just old school that way.
darksage29 1 year ago 3
hey, that's the nanodrop my univ has! :D
pGFTuv 1 year ago
Good advertisement... it´s like those ones presented by Mike Biceps and MarY Abdominals to sell the new "Press-Ups 3000"...shabby, shabby
3j0a67bk 1 year ago
i literally just dont understand what the fuck is going on
caaammmz 1 year ago
You won't believe this but my lecturer actually showed it during our lecture. Now that's awesome :D of course we had a hearty laugh at the final scene! Teehee!
wherewillyoube 1 year ago
What is the song in this around time index 2.47?
Rsavage08 1 year ago
Porcelain by Moby
bendhoward 1 year ago
nerds!!! Gah!!
xXTheGreatestOneXx 2 years ago
post two papers to Nature! in 20 minutes...some kind of genius
livking 2 years ago 29
With the NanoDrop (tm) spectrophotometer, anytthing is possible!
RedDaVincy 2 years ago
@livking Who said they got accepted or even past review :-)
with 2 papers in 20 minutes his literature was probably mickey mouse :-)
still 20 min is at least good for a coffee....
FranzEhr 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@livking Who said they got accepted or even past review :-)
with 2 papers in 20 minutes his literature was probably mickey mouse :-)
still 20 min is at least good for a coffee....
FranzEhr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@livking Who said they got accepted or even past review :-)
with 2 papers in 20 minutes his literature was probably mickey mouse :-)
still 20 min is at least good for a coffee....
FranzEhr 1 year ago
This video is a total turn-on: the nanodrop with Snoop Dogg's song in the background...BRILLIANT.
delawarerocks 2 years ago 2
Yeah, now I want a Nanodrop poster above my bed
Targaeryen 2 years ago
haha. nice ole-timey treatment of the original spec. a great video, guys!
BodaciousBurnley 2 years ago
gosH i cannot blive thiz vid is kinda interesting...
illZwhY 2 years ago
rofl. pie-pet it back up.
meowludo 2 years ago
OMG WANT!
Miyiku 2 years ago
Beware of very high molecular weight DNA or your Nanodrop will end up in the parking lot with a trail of Lab debris behind it!!!
cghmaster 2 years ago
Oh my!
I really want one now...
SpectatorAbExtra 2 years ago
OH i love the nanodrop! i love the clicky sounds the lever makes at work.
and yes. super easy to use.
qmwnebrtv 2 years ago
I love the clicky sound too! Haha.
stepb24 2 years ago
i caught up on my literature...AND SUBMITTED TWO PAPERS TO NATURE!!!! WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN DOING?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
stlunaticajv 2 years ago 48
this guy can catch up on his reading AND submit TWO papers to Nature, all in 20 mins?!? He is a machine as well hmmmmmm?
Jamie can do Maths AND probably he went for a coffee with friends, keeping a social life as well as working....
microzoo 2 years ago 4
he totally ignored the blank-mesurement
Ironduke666 2 years ago 3
You totally ignored the dictionary. lrn2spell
meowludo 2 years ago
I kept waiting for something to terrible to happen with that FLAMING BUNSEN BURNER.
binkari 2 years ago 5
Wait a minute... if it's accurate to "2 nanograms per microliter", why is he reporting a "76.4 nanograms per microliter"? The decimal isn't significant at all!
ChemistryGirl09 2 years ago 2
2 ng ± 2% error, so he'd report it as 76.4 ± something where the 0.4 is still significant, but contains the uncertainty.
DrunkenCellist 2 years ago 2
We have one at work and when measuring different samples from the same source the results vary considerably... we've gone back to the old way... waste of money
serpentcharmer2006 2 years ago 3
@serpentcharmer2006 you probably had a shit sample, aggregate DNA...
magstardrums 7 months ago
wow, that's an awesome machine. i've done it the old school way as well with a spectrophotometer and that nanodrop seems so much easier.
RailmanDave 2 years ago
too bad its like 8 grand :(
bobjonesu 2 years ago
Oh my days.
Iosif53 2 years ago
One question:
Why default wavelength is at 230 nm, if absorvance of nucleic acids is better at 260 nm?
millandudu 3 years ago
que mide l concentracion de proteinas y su pureza estupìdo
hirokury 2 years ago
hirokury,
You don't understand me! And I don't need your help!
Dumb!!!
millandudu 2 years ago
sorry for late answer,
but if I'm not mistaken proteins will also absorb at 260. Cause of some aminoacids.
230 should avoid this...
Hope I'm correct and you are helped out
greetings
1Messiah4All 2 years ago
Thanks!
millandudu 2 years ago
the ratio 260/230 must be > than 2. it assess the presence of contaminants wich absorbs in 230nm
carbohydrates and phenol all have absorbance near 230 nm. The TRIzol reagent (for RNA extraction) is a phenolic solution which absorbs in the UV both at 230 nm and ~270 nm
mimiandolini 2 years ago
This reminds me of 'The PCR song by Scientists for Better PCR'. Now that was a good advertisement!
nhojmabon 3 years ago
nanodrop makes life soo ezzzz.
sharfee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I CAN'T HANDLE THE NERDYNESS
JESUS
nduguchansler 3 years ago
one question: can you make 70k straight out of school?
MuppetMower13 3 years ago 2
hahahah cute ^^
sesemeoil49 3 years ago
very bad intro should have started with potential benifits vs bad aspects informally, then the rst but by the end i had no doubt of the massive superiorty of the nano dohicky and if i had or worked in a lab i'd pay the price for acuracy and time saving and enhanced modes of use
semandoogon 3 years ago
"In that time (25 min) I've managed to catch up on my literature for the week and submit two papers to Nature."
Haha. I wish.
dougbrummell 3 years ago 2
"siiense iz too confuzing for mehhhhh..."
these guys have probably saved your life more times than you can count.
bam22056 3 years ago 2
I wish that the end and the begining were the only parts of that movie
ericalexander19 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WTF?!?!?!?! I DIDNt UNDERSTAND SHIT!!!!!!
but wow. i wonder what scientist are trying to accomplish?
why cant we live in a civilized place... with science <- BUT NOT TOO MUCH!
mastershake1000 3 years ago
You live the way you live due to scientists, so I don't see how you can have too much science. (Science literally means knowledge, and who the fuck want to be ignorant?).
Aaberg123 3 years ago
lol civilization started because of agriculture. which its self was learned through science. MORE SCIENCE ALL around
cruxbucket 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
DORKS!!!!
willpu 3 years ago
geeky...
umitonami 3 years ago
I used the nanodrop in college...it is pretty cool.
kenn0285 3 years ago
i nanodropped your mom!
csimo13 3 years ago
Love this video! Now that NanoDrop is part of Thermo Fisher their 2nd gen products should be very interesting. I've seen their high throughput model, but not played with it yet. This model in the video was a real game changer though.
LabSnap 3 years ago
lol @ the two papers to nature
Ipikop 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE get a life!
danmcn5 3 years ago
those "no life" dudes make sure you don't die next time you wind up in a hospital. Anyways, it's a much more productive way of spending time than watching promoted videos on YouTube
Villentretmerth 3 years ago 3
OMG! WE NEED THIS IN OUR LAB. it frusterates me when ONE sample is off.
LeaM87 3 years ago
tee hee hee
paulajayperry 3 years ago
awesome piece of equipment
very gay couple
drosophila82 3 years ago
Isn't there a concern about cross contamination. Just joking! I don't have a damn clue what you're talking about.
ITHEREONETHATHASNT 3 years ago
Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerds
xtothel 3 years ago
This seems way easier than the spectrophotometer we use. What's the catch. I see below it says it only cost around 5500 which is what we paid for ours.
UncleRico13 3 years ago
post 2 papers to Nature...hahaa
fleek164 3 years ago 2
Brilliant!!!! This video has made a very boring day at work (in the lab) enjoyable. Rock on guys!!!
dixonmciver 3 years ago
we are using this type in our lab and its pretty easy and smart. we have good practise with RNAs but we are not successful with Lowrys. does anybody know how to measure proteins on this?
boysgo 3 years ago
How much does this thing cost? I just need a ballpark number please.
kofkok 3 years ago
It's around $5500 per unit for the ND-1000 (The one you see in the video.)
crizman88 3 years ago
For you low level guys and gals then try the NanoVue from GE - its easier, faster and looks the part.
Novaspec 4 years ago
sponsored by NanoDrop! No way! What you fail to mention is that 1 µL is not usually a suffiencient volume and the Nanodrop tends to need 2 µL to teake real measurements. Although all of the advertising material says 1 µL will do. Jibbed! Nevertheless our NanoDrop has been nominates for the greatest timesaving device in our department.
kcoldie 4 years ago
lol thtz hilarious! i watched it w/ my dad nd sister nd they lovedd it 2! awesome job u guyzz
- chandler wessel
xJuicyCoutureLuvrX 4 years ago
John, that's fantastic. Good to see you again!
donaldwtube 4 years ago
Great Work John, good switch..
--danishnajam
dnajam 4 years ago
That video is nanodropalicious!!
dugong13 4 years ago 3
Great piece of work!
kielhoff 4 years ago
Niicceeeee....
rahulahu 4 years ago
ahaha
DaveShi 4 years ago
I like pizza!!!
gregatpierce 4 years ago