See the Aimed At America 1 video and discover why you cannot trust your pentagon controlled troops. When will all these parallels stop being coincidences??
the only problem with the two crashes, i.e. the WTC and the Pentagon, in the world trade center you can see the hole that shows the outline of the wings, and at the pentagon there is no wing hole... i think it was a missle or something else...
Go listen to The Alex Jones Radio/TV Show for the Actual News on YOUR Misleaders destroying the US Constitution, US Sovereignty, The US Monetary System and the US Economy all by design to issue in their unelected world currency, court and gov't.
AMASS THE PEACEFUL MILITIA - Love is the answer. We all know that. EXCELLENT VIDEO Chap!!! Ron Paul 2012. Liberty PAC. Go V for VIRAL Online The Business of We The People! Google: DanielHall4Freedom Facebook: Daniel Patrick Hall Our Words are Weapons. Our Ammo, the Truth. VERBALMILITIA: ON4F001 \V/ Club V on Facebook ~@ VM !!! LOVE, LOVE, LOVE!!!
AMASS THE MILITIA President's Day MONEYBOMB EXCELLENT VIDEO !!! Ron Paul 2012 Liberty PAC Go V for VIRAL Online The Business of We The People! Google: DanielHall4Freedom Facebook: Daniel Patrick Hall Our Words are Weapons Our Ammo, the Truth. VERBALMILITIA: ON4F001 \V/ Club V on Facebook ~@ VM !!! UNITY & PURPOSE
Go to the free site INFOWARS. COM & listen to the Free World Wide Radio/TV Show for the Actual News, 24/7. The site reads like a newspaper & the articles change daily. Go to the Infowars Shop & watch every documentary there for FREE on YOUtube in Full Length HD.
In case you haven't realized that your government has been hijacked yet.
This idiot changed his story once he was paid/threatened. No plane hit the pentagon, was most likely a bomb. If they bombed wtc they can bomb pentagon too
Israel attacked us on 9-11 so we would fight all over the Middle East on their behalf. Dual citizen Israeli / Americans INSIDE our Government are more loyal to Israel than to America. GOOGLE : TED OLSON CALL LIE GOOGLE : ODIGO WARNING GOOGLE : UNUSUAL EVACUATIONS GOOGLE : SILVERSTEIN PULL IT GOOGLE : DANCING MOSSAD GOOGLE : MEXICO MOSSAD GOOGLE : BIN LADEN DENIED 9-11 GOOGLE : ADAM PEARLMAN ADL GOOGLE : CHENEY JONESREPORT GOOGLE : NEUTREI KARTA GOOGLE : ZERO 9/11 DOCUMENTARY
Whole thing is a fucking lie- not to mention- if 2 planes had struck our towers in NY- the US has the capacity to protect our airspace in DC in SECONDS. Thanks for the video
While Ti will melt at 1688 Celsius, it's solid form will auto-ignite at 1204 Celsius . That means if you try to melt Ti, it will burn before it gets hot enough (only 248 Celsius if it is powdered).
That's beside the point though as there are plenty of engine parts that have been found.
9/11 was a demolition job blamed on Muslims to start the "War on Terror" so US could Invade Iraq. There was no plane that hit the Pentagon. The FBI confiscated all the video footage in the area. Why? What are they hiding? A bomb? A missle? The fact that there is no plane? If there was a plane that hit the Pentagon the government woud have shown it already.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You lot are a bunch of morons. You've been saying for years JFK was shot by a man on the grassy noll . You look for a conspiricey in everything. Your a bunch of paranoid freaks who thinks everyones out to get u. There's only one thing out to get u and that's all the Muslims. Roast the lot in pig fat.
I call it the magic plane theory. As the plane touched the surface of the Pentagons building it shrunk into a 14 by 14 foot object. If you beleive 9/11 then you beleive the magic plane theory.
how many cameras surround the pentagon?....how many show a jet hitting the building?...WHY?...we should have several different angles..they put together a plan and left way too many loose ends...
And we're supposed to believe not a single camera at the Pentagon could capture the incoming plane hitting the pentagon!? How many hundreds of absurd events, failings, coincidences and official contradictions and proven lies around 9/11 does it take for the flat earthers to accept the glaringly obvious? As fairytales go, Goldilocks and the three bears is much more believable; at least there's some logic and coherence.
Oh ya, by the way....... The FBI has now confirmed that the calls made from FLT 77 by Mrs. Olsen to her husband, TED OLSEN (solicitor general for Bush Admin.) were never made. The FBI, under deposition in the Zakarias M. case, confirmed that the entire drama of Mrs. Olsen calling about hijackers with boxcutters was a complete fabrication. Ted Olsen has since recanted his story.
why would this husband lie about his wife?...My God i sure wouldn't...But to save my life and my kids lives...I probably will..did u ever think that the FBI came after him?..and in return had to say...Ooooops i lied about my wife?
There is no way you can "hide" a Boeing 757 inside the pentagon....... especially since the pentagon did not even collapase until nearly an hour after the impact. Some people actually believe a 767 melted the twin towers and yet a Boeing 757 could not even burn the grass on the Pentagon laws 25 feet from the point of impact. You have to have a STRONG desire NOT believe in the truth to reject the obvious fact that the official story is a LIE.
Maybe the larger pieces of debris were not visible to the reporter as he stood far away.
And if look at one side of the pentagon there was multiple debris on the lawn from. Would a missile leave debris, for those who believe in that theory? There are so many photographs that show wheel-rims, engines, landing gear, pieces of the fuselage inside and outside the building. The damage is consistent in every way with a 757. The plane descended 7000 feet in 2 minutes to crash in to Pentagon, man!
watch "9-11 in about a minute" - captian sherlock . vigalent guardian , gyroscope chips hijacking the hijacked planes. if you think the passenger were freaked imagine the pilot and the hijackers went through when the plan was flying itself
No, he he didn't stand far away, he said "From my close-up inspection" - he wasn't far away. Ask yourself this - isn't the pentagon collapse the last improbable collapse of the day? Why indeed did the Pentagon walls collapse? And while it collapses, watch the guys at 1:12 in white lab coats ignore the building fall. Now there's something you don't see every day, but here are a couple guys who don't stop walking and even bother to LOOK. Goofy.
You are correct in fact they pull two engines from the ruble and the pull the wheel hubs from the building. They did not see the aircraft on radar because civilian air radar read transponders and they were turned off on the hijacked planes. Also there is a problem with hitting the other side as that would mean the plane is flying right into and across the landing approach to National airport and possible mid air crash and failed mission. They had no way of knowing about the empty part.
Bilracer. Lets forget, for a moment, the details of the day of 9/11/2001. The question should be "how was everything that transpired on 9/11 even possible?". The Pentagon should not have been hit by anything because of advance warning. Why was there no investigation into this so that we can hold accountable those who neglected to do their jobs? Too many people dropped the ball that day to simply ignore it and 3000 people died as a result (not to mention the massive property damage).
"The genius of you Americans is that you never made clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which makes us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to them we are missing."
Mass media on site at the crime of the scene has enough visual evidence to disprove that commercial airplanes were the case in Flight 77 and 93 yet somehow they have been silenced since then.
"Our friends and allies naively believe that we have a plan and know what we are doing... they are convinced that we have a secret plan we are not sharing with them... They look at me with disbelief and bewilderment when I tell them there is no secret plan and we are as incompetent as they fear."
There ought to be more video of the crash itself. If the government has not released it, they might be afraid of what it would show. OR they might be holding it in reserve to spring it on us if we ever get too popular. That way, they can discredit the entire 9/11 truth movement.
IMO, WTX7 and the molten metal are our strongest pieces of evidence.
So... the remains of every passenger was found at the scene and yet, two 6 ton steel and titanium engines were completely vaporized? Oh - ok. Only one 6 ton steel and titantium engine was completely vaporized - the other one shrunk down into a much smaller turbine engine, which we can see in the official photos. Great. I'm glad the 9/11 commission cleared that one up!
The bodies were badly burned and the engines too. Your point?
If this whole thing was a government cover-up, why wouldn't they have flown ONE plane in a WTC building instead doing all this extra stuff? Why not plant WMDs in Iraq? The whole 9/11 Truth movement has no rationality.
The point is that the official story says that plenty of tiny tiny DNA was found, but a massive 6 ton jet was VAPORIZED. Not just very badly burned, but VAPORIZED out of EXISTENCE!
It didn't. Once again, check some non-conspiracy theory links when you Google "Pentagon debris".
The conspiracy theorists claim that it "totally burned". They ignore all the debris and dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who saw the plane crash in there.
Think critically. Believe what you think is true, not necessarily what you want to believe.
I am not 100% sure about the plane and pentagon thing, but I am 100% sure about explosives being planted in the WTC towers. I do think still that it's not feasible that a plane could just disintegrate like that.
Let's say I'm an evil genius and I'm going to sabotage my own country. I'd probably just blow up a truck bomb in the WTC that was much bigger than the one in '93.
You claim that the evil genius would hijack two jets, put explosives in both towers, fly a missile in the Pentagon (in broad daylight), and for absolutely no reason, make a plane crash in a field in Shanksville.
No gabzz, I appreciate your thoughtful reply by the way, (instead of some who get belligerant and insulting). I may check out your suggestion but I still know that the whole thing was a poorly executed sabotage by our government who wanted an excuse to go to Iraq and fight.
They had dozens of men take MONTHS placing explosives all over the towers. No one has ever come forward to collect their Pulitzer Prize by coming forward and telling everyone that explosives were placed. Also, NOT A SINGLE PERSON in the towers, which were constantly occupied saw a single piece of explosive prior the collapse. They would've bribed hundred of thousands of engineers, demolitions experts etc.
I read that the WTC towers were closed down, for I'm not sure how long, but closed to the public and anyone that worked there...suspicion that explosives were planted then. Have you not seen the numerous videos of newscasts mentioning over and over explosions going off? You can even hear them yourself!
It would've taken over half a year to plant the explosives. Was it really closed for that long?
Also, if the plane crashed in the building with charges, the charges would've went off right away.
Also, you're ignoring every expert that says that they weren't CDs. If they were, don't you think an overwhelming majority of them would think they were instead of a whoppin 0?
Explosions don't equal bombs. In every large fire, you will hear some.
Half a year? Where you get your info? Do you know every trick of CIA??? Come on! There are videos right in here in You Tube showing the explosions going off before the towers came down..you can see AND hear them!! YOU are not thinking critically because you don't even have all the info!
Demolition experts can take weeks or months to prepare a building for a demolition. No building that was even close of the size of the WTC was ever brought down by CD, which would've taken many times more than the normal time to prepare.
To this comment on how long it takes to do a controlled demolition gabzz..I refer you to Larry Silverstein's interview on PBS talking of how the Fire Dept. decided to "pull" the building #7 at a moment's notice on 9/11. It may still be on Google video or even in here.
What did you think was going to happen when a building that big collapses on itself? Did you not expect a "bang"? The "squibs" that Loose Change identified are just compressed air being shot out of the windows. There is a video of a close up of the fires as the building collapses and it CLEARLY does not have any explosions coming out of it.
How come there isn't a SINGLE demolition expert that believes it was a controlled demolition. Please answer me this.
American experts, Italian experts, Chinese experts, the whole nine yards. I recommend you to read a paper written on the collapses on implosionworld dot com.
The fact that there's not a single one (not even North Korean or Iranian) that has spoken saying it was a CD and that you still believe it was is beyond me.
Thanks, gab. I'll try to look into it further as per your suggestions....but I think I'm gonna find more evidence to the contrary...respect to you for doing your own research though! ( : D
gab, on the WMD's, from what I've read about these people, they think that the general populace are very stupid, and probably didn't even think that far ahead about what if none were found? Like..."We just want to make it to Iraq and and get the ball rolling in a way that could last indefinitely!!"
Please do check the site I recommended. If you want to be known as a truth seeker, you must look at ALL the evidence, not only the one that goes by your beliefs.
If you look at the whole clear picture, you should realize that 9/11 conspiracy theories have no scientific merit and simply don't make sense. The conspiracy sites are always very misleading and manipulative with what they choose as "evidence".
Do you know about the Project for a New American Century in which the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" is mentioned in order to go to war?? Aaron Russo's acquaintance with a Rockefeller, Nick R. to be exact revealed to him in one of their conversations that there "was going to be an event" shortly before 9/11. You can hear it from Russo's mouth by going to Alex Jones interview with Aaron Russo right here.
Uh - many people reported seeing something that was definitely not a Boeing 757. That's one of the reasons that the 9/11 report is so controversial. It leaves out a lot of eye witness testimony. Also, the report states that all passengers were identifiiable by their remains and DNA, but much of the plane including a 6 ton steel and titanium jet turbine engine was 'vaporized'. No rational person can accept this without question.
Google search "Pentagon witnesses". We have witnesses (names included) describing and AMERICAN AIRLINES plane crashing in the Pentagon. If such testimony of people not seeing a plane that you claim exists, please present it to me.
I agree that no rational person could believe that every passenger was identified and the jet was completely vaporized. However, your statement isn't even true (as well as every other claim by 9/11 CTs).
Here's some simple math. The height of a Boeing 757 is approx. 42 ft. The height of the Pentagon is 77ft. In order for the plane to hit only the first floor of the building, the engines would have to be below ground level. Look at how low the vapor trail is in the Pentagon security cam.
Do you know how much money the CIA, NSA and all the other secret agencies get? A fuckin lot!
You think they can't afford to pay a whole lotta staff to creatively debunk the impossible? Most Americans are stupid enough to believe that steel buildings can collapse by fire. It's not a hard task to convince Joe American.
I guess it's not that hard to convince every chemistry expert, every demolition expert, structural engineer, every physicist as well. After all, none of these people are truthers. Would you take their word on what they're best at or take the word of a college reject/hack filmmaker?
Please explain how all these experts are wrong and how you're right. Is it just "because"? Is it because you just "know it", because "Dylan Avery told me so"?
I have not exhausted all sources of information on the subject but I have watched an MIT graduate engineer explain how the WTC came down..explosives, period. It's a horrible crime and one that should be addressed again for the sake of almost 3,000 souls who died.
those are 100% garunteed facts that he was behind this? i dont think so...i dont care wat he was doing that day, give me stuff like why it was a missile and not a plane, controlled demolition...prove that that kinda stuff happened...
Planes are big. The white blur in the 5 frame vid - you cant tell me thats a plane! get real. Nor can you tell me the new vid shows a plane. It's not clearly visible. So grainy and blurry. When can we see the real stuff?
NEVER. It doesn't show what they want us to see: A commercial jetliner.
wheres your proof? even if it wasnt terrorists, even if it was thermite that brought down the towers, how can you be so positive it was bush? oklahoma city bombing wasnt any govts fault, some solo guy brought down that building (not actually brought down, but u no wat im saying)...but still, u have no proof...give me 3 solid 100% garunteed facts that this was bushs fault
krispykreme82603, FLIGHT 93 WAS 100 PERCENT BOGUS AND CONSPIRED BY THE BUSH REGIME, IN 2001 CELL PHONES DID NOT WORK ON BOARD ANY AIR CRAFT UNLESS YOU WERE WITH-IN 2300 METERS FROM A TOWER, I KNOW I NEVER COULD GET MY NEW CELL TO WORK AND ANY TECH WITH SPRINT OR WHAT HAVE YOU WILL AGREE. THEY WERE HEROS EVEN THOUGH THE CALLS WERE FAKE AND THE 777 WAS SHOT DOWN DOWN HENCE ALL THE DEBRIS SPREAD FOR MILES, THE HOLE 15 FEET ACROSS MEANING THE NOSE CONE ONLY MADE IMPACT..
wow, and how would u know unless u witnessed it? how do you know all of this is true? did george bush admit it? huh? and it was a 757 not a 777 which just proves u dont know what your talking about...if u cant even get the type of plane right how is anyone supposed to believe what you say is true?
dude, the scientific part of the video says that the plane crashing into the pentagon is not true and then at the end it says that it is true. :S confusing ...
plus, how would the terrorist have known that that part of the pentagon was the emptiest and being re-inforced? he didnt have instructions on where to hit he was just told to crash into it. even if he did get instructions its hard to tell which side is which up in the air, maybe its just that lucky 20% chance that he hit the stronger and less populated side...there was a 1 in 5 chance, thats not that much...now if the pentagon were really 100 sided then itd be a bit more suspicious....
doesnt anyone find it strange how only this one person found every "loophole" in the 9/11 attacks? have any of you actually done any research on whether this is all true or were u all just gullible enough to accept it?
The relatively light wings & tail were shredded when they struck the Pentagon's thick masonry wall at 500 mph. The entry hole was plenty big enough. Thousands of plane fragments were found inside & outside, & a few larger ones as well, & photos WERE indeed released. First responders found body fragments & DNA analysis matched them to all but one of the FL 77 passengers. There's no evidence FL 77 went anywhere else. Absolutely none.
says who? besides this guy and any other people idiotic enough to believe it. i cant find anything else on the internet that says anything about a cruise missile hitting the pentagon...yur following someone elses THEORY! these arent proven facts
this first guy talking in this video, has a 1 hour and 30 minute vid. Watch that one, wish ic oudl find it. The 2nd guy talking doesn't have hard facts, you're right, but the 1st guy, did extensive research
here's a good question...where's the plane that "didn't" hit the pentagon? Where are the people that "didn't die" on this plane? im sure their kids miss them alot
Look at the fact ans not some stupid conspiracy movie or website and you will realise that it was in fact a plane you moron.And yes jet fuel will melt aluminum,havnt you ever seen aluminum melt in a bon-fire.Sad that you all get your info from a 19 year old punk.If you do the research you can see there is quite alot of debree on the pentagon lawn.
9/11 was most likely a "false flag" or "Strategy of tension" operation conducted by far right-wing elements associated with those in power to scare and galavanize the public to push through legislation and foreign policy that would never have happened otherwise, and conveniently made some poeple very rich.
now the evidence of controlled demolitions at the WTC building is overwhelming, free fall speed with NO resistance from lower floors, tons of concrete PULVERIZED the 47 steel columns blown into 30 ft sections, classic demolition squibs, fire almost out, fire not hot enough to melt steel, wtc7 wasn't even hit yet it also fell in free fall speed straight down into it's own footprint the list of evidence for controlled demolitions is a very long one.
I don't tend to believe things until ive witnessed them with my own eyes, ive never seen a plane hit the pentagon, therefore i cannot believe one hit, the evidence we have suggests it wasn't a plane, well not a boeing 747 anyway.
4 Minutes into this wee see the trajectory lines up with the Washington Monument and hits the renovated records section that keeps track of the budget. It would have been easier to hit the building head on but this is how it was hit.
A Boeing 757 en route from Dulles International Airport near Washington to Los Angeles. The plane was carrying 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots. It crashed into the Pentagon about 9:40 a.m. ET.
HERE! Now if you doubt this you trot you asses up to Dulles and tell THEM, the Air Controllers, the clerks, the baggage people, that flight 77 never left Dulles. I dare you!
Looks like I have to do people's research for them because they can think of conspiracy bullshit all day but refuse to follow up on any of it. Get out of the porn and the gaming and into the fact finding people!
Hey Midex, Mothman, The Jersey Devil, and Bigfoot just stopped by in their UFO. Their buddies the Greys dropped them off and will be back for them in the morning. Care to IM with them?
Takkyon. You demand doesn't make sense. Flight 77 could have been dropped in the Ocean mate. Flight 77 could have been stolen and re-painted. Where is the video from the Pentagon attack? What reason can you think of that is legitimate as to them refusing to release the 80 videos FBI seized from neighbouring buildings' security cameras?
Listen to yourself. Flight 77 COULD'VE been dropped into the Ocean? Try using a line like that in a court of law when they find coke in your car and say "your Honor it COULDVE been planted by the police or elves or fairies!" Geesh.
We have RELIGIOUS idiots that are willing to commit suicide to kill us, and people are grasping at this X Files conspiracy shit. Show me an intact or a crashed Flight 77 then I'll start accepting something else.
Give me 2 or more CREDIBLE radar operators that tracked flight 77 and its transponder code going anywhere other than the Pentagon and you'll convert me! Short of that , it is just another Mel Gibson Conspiracy Theory, with someone reading Catcher In The Rye!
Contrary to what you're asking, are there any evidence that there were in fact a Boeing 777 with a flight full of passengers? People need to be given the right, just as you have, to question the legitimacy of any claims especially regarding an issue so serious.It is not "bullsh**" at all. Sometimes, the best cover up story usually entails logic to make it more plausable and what better explanation for a building to just explode than the "a plane had struck it".
The flight was scheduled to depart at 8:10 AM EDT, but actually departed at 8:20. [1] It was later determined that three of the hijackers had been stopped before boarding the flight because they failed the metal detector test, but were nonetheless allowed to enter the plane.
think about this: why the pentagon as a target? it is a flat, huge structure where even if a plane did hit it, it would do very little to the building as a whole. Very unaesthetic as an attack... absurd as a terror strategy. If the US govn. wanted us to really believe that we were under attack, the senate/congress/white house would have been hit. Instead, they killed regular people.
pj1123, avoid simple inductive refuations of a conspuracy theory. The flawed assumption is that you know the grand plan. Just stick to the facts and then put them together to start draw a picture. FACT: WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Inferance: 911 was an inside job. Why? Proves Foreknowledge, Involvment, Cover-up.
Midex, erm..1 question. If i am not mistaken. Did your president not back bush? did your president send troops to Iraq? The 911 attacks, began the war on terror. First afganistaan (bullshit war), when the main interest was Iraq. So, when the president of australia watched this footage...ermmmmmmm..did he not, i mean him being an educated man and voted into power by the australian people, did he not see the bullshit (no wings, parts of a plane blah blah?
AahRO, you are assuming that our Prime Minister is honest. We can't do anything in Australia. We are ruled by tyranny far greater than America. The US was the last bastion of democracy and now because they fooled you with 911 you are letting them shred the Bill of Rights in the name of Terror.
Because he even knows what a cruise missle is, it shows that he is capable of the distinction between that and a 757. Who told him to change his story?
Watch carefully. At 2:20min, an eyewitness says he saw a "jet", an "airliner" of "American Airlines". Now, search youtube for "911 pentagon video explanation", and forward to 4:30min. This is the SAME EYEWITNESS, this time sure that he saw a "cruise missle". Which statement did he make first, and why did he change his story?
You can tell which statement he made first - look at the parked car in the "missile with wings" one - in the "757 one you see that car driving off!!11" So somebody told him to change his story OR he was using "Missile with wings" as a metaphor and they have edited out the full speech so they can use it to discredit the truth by releasing it later along with plane footage, thus discrediting the WHOLE movement. We know WTC7 was demo job - thus It was ALL inside JOb.
The official story insults the morality and intelligence of the american people. 60% of americans want 911 reopened - if you live in a free democratic society you explain to me why your polls are not used for demoractic action - why do your elected government do what ever they want for four years? You are not FREE. You are slaves.
MORALITY!!!! bah, we dont have moraltity, we dont have virtues either, only the things we buy at wal mart have those, thats why every Sunday theres so mauch people at wal mart that you cant move your cart
If people are so God damn sure that the government has nothing to hide, then why won't they just allow an independant investigation, or even reopen the 911 commission? Until they do, we have absolutely no reason to believe any of what they've told us.
The "movie" isn't claiming that no plane was ever found, it simply starts off with a CNN reporter who reported that he didn't see any plane there. The video also takes into account that witnesses DID see a plane at the Pentagon, in fact it shows a witness saying that. The video also mentions that plane wreckage was found. The video is clearly NOT saying that no plane hit the pentagon. The question is "What plane hit the pentagon?" Was it really an 80 ton boeing 757? Did you watch the video?
ok mate - so I guess the Pentagon refuses to release ANY of the dozens of videos they seized from teh area of the attack becuase of national security or something? The People of America ARE the rulers - they demand the footage - where is it? Sheraton Hotel footage. Where is it?
You see, we don't have thousands of people saying "We want proof that planes hit the twin towers" - Why? Because we have proof. We have video footage. But we dont' have any of Pentagon. Further there is nothing in the photos proving wreckage - no bodies, no luggage, no wing sections on the lawn - nothing.
Yes but can we be sure that they had people IN them and they were not actually radio controlled airliners meant to appear to be hijacked airliners? The Secret Government may have had fake radio controlled jets flown into the Towers so we would have an excuse to go to war with the peaceful Muslims.
Yeah! It was all staged maybe, just like the Moon landing that we all KNOW was faked!
Have you seen the 757 at the pentagon? How did the wings disappear into the hole? What about the 9ft 6 tonne engines? Did they disintergrate on impact?
SCReuter, how about you tell us why five years ago the FBI seized all the surrounding security camera footage from hotels, gas stations, and have never released it back to the public? Why don't you explain the collapse of WTC7?
1. We only know of two places that the FBI seized security tapes from: the Citgo Gas Station and Doubletree Hotel.
2. The videos were confiscated because they could have potentially helped with the investigation. Obviously.
3. The Citgo footage has since been made available to the public, proving nothing of interest was captured. As for the Doubletree tape, it's planned to be released by November 9.
you call that evidence? How about this two hour testimony by a witness at the site? I guess you think everyone has so much free time on their hands to conduct millions of hours of research - I geuss that fact that 60% of americans want 911 opened again doesn't mean anything in a "free" democractic society. I guess we have to wait for King Bush to let us reinvestigate 911 officially? The public research is calling it TREASON
20,000 people work in that building. The part of the building hit was under renovations. The people who died were construction workers. Everyone see the photos of emergency workers being scrubbed off and decontaminted in their toxic suits? What toxins were at that site? The dogs two were scrubbed down and washed on site. Depleted Uranium explain that punch-out whole in the third ring?
the media(the fourth branch) isn't gonna cover the stories of what really happpened, when they do have people on media shows with the 9/11 truth movment they always paint them as 'nut job conspiracy theorists".
Believe what you want SCReuter. Nobodies stopping you. There is a scientific methodology, and academic methodology that is the foundation of modernity. These people you call "conspiracy nutjobs" are using the same rationale that brought you the internet - LOGIC.
When are the media networks gonna show some fucking balls and tell us what REALLY happened at the pentagon, as this footage shows. What the fuck is really going on?
The media networks are pary of the criminal organisation. They control who gets into power because they control YOU. Dont' rely on the media anymore - you have the internet. Stop being like a child waiting for daddy to say the word. Grow up - you control your destiny or else your destiny will control you.
I think you've got me wrong. I dont believe the official story either. I think it was a missile, or possible a Predator. I also think the WTC were blown up. And, you are accusing the Americans of being lazy fucks, which they might be. But I'm Canadian...
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See the Aimed At America 1 video and discover why you cannot trust your pentagon controlled troops. When will all these parallels stop being coincidences??
vincent15641 4 months ago
the only problem with the two crashes, i.e. the WTC and the Pentagon, in the world trade center you can see the hole that shows the outline of the wings, and at the pentagon there is no wing hole... i think it was a missle or something else...
Entai2 7 months ago
Go listen to The Alex Jones Radio/TV Show for the Actual News on YOUR Misleaders destroying the US Constitution, US Sovereignty, The US Monetary System and the US Economy all by design to issue in their unelected world currency, court and gov't.
INFOWARS.COM
Of, by and for the militia.
VERBALMILITIA
marc27
verbalmilitia 11 months ago
DanHall4RonPaul 11 months ago
DanHall4RonPaul 11 months ago
Go to the free site INFOWARS. COM & listen to the Free World Wide Radio/TV Show for the Actual News, 24/7. The site reads like a newspaper & the articles change daily. Go to the Infowars Shop & watch every documentary there for FREE on YOUtube in Full Length HD.
In case you haven't realized that your government has been hijacked yet.
Watch this:
youtube.? com/user/verbalmilitia or, ...
The American Dream By The Provocateur Network
youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU
~@ VM !!!
kkeshom 11 months ago
This idiot changed his story once he was paid/threatened. No plane hit the pentagon, was most likely a bomb. If they bombed wtc they can bomb pentagon too
donutmoron 1 year ago
well............... it was real terriost did attack it and hijacked the planes
sunsknightstars 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
safeuss 2 years ago
That is one UNLUCKY terrorist.
CHIPSTERO7 2 years ago
Whole thing is a fucking lie- not to mention- if 2 planes had struck our towers in NY- the US has the capacity to protect our airspace in DC in SECONDS. Thanks for the video
Susieshepherd 2 years ago
While Ti will melt at 1688 Celsius, it's solid form will auto-ignite at 1204 Celsius . That means if you try to melt Ti, it will burn before it gets hot enough (only 248 Celsius if it is powdered).
That's beside the point though as there are plenty of engine parts that have been found.
jgoemat 2 years ago
9/11 conspiracy theories are bullshit!!!
anteracmacash 2 years ago
@anteracmacash AMERICAN GOVERMENT ARE BULLSHIT
miaminegrofc 1 year ago
good for you...
anteracmacash 1 year ago
if america was attacked by surprise was every piece of evidence that may show othere wise destroyed or with held by the fbi
Bobmarley4201992 2 years ago
Show me all of the evidence you've seen by every other case the FBI has ever investigated.
jgoemat 2 years ago
Comment removed
Fogslifted 2 years ago
9/11 was a demolition job blamed on Muslims to start the "War on Terror" so US could Invade Iraq. There was no plane that hit the Pentagon. The FBI confiscated all the video footage in the area. Why? What are they hiding? A bomb? A missle? The fact that there is no plane? If there was a plane that hit the Pentagon the government woud have shown it already.
buddyfreakinholly 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You lot are a bunch of morons. You've been saying for years JFK was shot by a man on the grassy noll . You look for a conspiricey in everything. Your a bunch of paranoid freaks who thinks everyones out to get u. There's only one thing out to get u and that's all the Muslims. Roast the lot in pig fat.
tac3571 3 years ago
I call it the magic plane theory. As the plane touched the surface of the Pentagons building it shrunk into a 14 by 14 foot object. If you beleive 9/11 then you beleive the magic plane theory.
Tzimnewman3 3 years ago 3
WRONG!
ONLY I KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON 911!
I wasn't a missle or a plane that hit the Pentagon.
IT WAS KARL ROVE!
Karl Rove sniffed a whole bottle of glue and drove a '74 Gremlin filled with explosives into the Pentagon.
I have the proof (and the charred Gremlin bumper).
KARL ROVE IS DEAD!
The guy we see now is his evil twin brother.........Lrak Rove.
ctcole77 2 years ago
how many cameras surround the pentagon?....how many show a jet hitting the building?...WHY?...we should have several different angles..they put together a plan and left way too many loose ends...
govtmule13 3 years ago 4
And we're supposed to believe not a single camera at the Pentagon could capture the incoming plane hitting the pentagon!? How many hundreds of absurd events, failings, coincidences and official contradictions and proven lies around 9/11 does it take for the flat earthers to accept the glaringly obvious? As fairytales go, Goldilocks and the three bears is much more believable; at least there's some logic and coherence.
mizofan 3 years ago 4
Oh ya, by the way....... The FBI has now confirmed that the calls made from FLT 77 by Mrs. Olsen to her husband, TED OLSEN (solicitor general for Bush Admin.) were never made. The FBI, under deposition in the Zakarias M. case, confirmed that the entire drama of Mrs. Olsen calling about hijackers with boxcutters was a complete fabrication. Ted Olsen has since recanted his story.
Google : "TED OLSEN LIE"
LIES LIES LIES.
kalebow 3 years ago 4
why would this husband lie about his wife?...My God i sure wouldn't...But to save my life and my kids lives...I probably will..did u ever think that the FBI came after him?..and in return had to say...Ooooops i lied about my wife?
Midnightryder7 2 years ago
A Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
There is no way the grass on the lawn would be unburned and some windows unbroken within 25 feet of the point of impact.
For those who know 9/11 was an inside job we do not need anyone to give us "answers".
Scientific fact and Physics is on our side.
kalebow 3 years ago 2
"scientific fact and physics is on our side"
Fail.
cjnewson88 3 years ago
There is no way you can "hide" a Boeing 757 inside the pentagon....... especially since the pentagon did not even collapase until nearly an hour after the impact. Some people actually believe a 767 melted the twin towers and yet a Boeing 757 could not even burn the grass on the Pentagon laws 25 feet from the point of impact. You have to have a STRONG desire NOT believe in the truth to reject the obvious fact that the official story is a LIE.
kalebow 3 years ago 6
Maybe the larger pieces of debris were not visible to the reporter as he stood far away.
And if look at one side of the pentagon there was multiple debris on the lawn from. Would a missile leave debris, for those who believe in that theory? There are so many photographs that show wheel-rims, engines, landing gear, pieces of the fuselage inside and outside the building. The damage is consistent in every way with a 757. The plane descended 7000 feet in 2 minutes to crash in to Pentagon, man!
limsniff 3 years ago
watch "9-11 in about a minute" - captian sherlock . vigalent guardian , gyroscope chips hijacking the hijacked planes. if you think the passenger were freaked imagine the pilot and the hijackers went through when the plan was flying itself
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 3 years ago
No, he he didn't stand far away, he said "From my close-up inspection" - he wasn't far away. Ask yourself this - isn't the pentagon collapse the last improbable collapse of the day? Why indeed did the Pentagon walls collapse? And while it collapses, watch the guys at 1:12 in white lab coats ignore the building fall. Now there's something you don't see every day, but here are a couple guys who don't stop walking and even bother to LOOK. Goofy.
bestinhouse 3 years ago
You are correct in fact they pull two engines from the ruble and the pull the wheel hubs from the building. They did not see the aircraft on radar because civilian air radar read transponders and they were turned off on the hijacked planes. Also there is a problem with hitting the other side as that would mean the plane is flying right into and across the landing approach to National airport and possible mid air crash and failed mission. They had no way of knowing about the empty part.
horsesboy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Most wreckage was INSIDE the pentagon you goobers.
How much brain power does it take to figure that out? The only ones who think it was a conspiracy are the ones that WANT it to be.
You guys can't come up with ONE DAMN thing that could have done that much damage. THERE WERE FREAKING WITNESSES GET OVER IT!
bilracer 3 years ago
Bilracer. Lets forget, for a moment, the details of the day of 9/11/2001. The question should be "how was everything that transpired on 9/11 even possible?". The Pentagon should not have been hit by anything because of advance warning. Why was there no investigation into this so that we can hold accountable those who neglected to do their jobs? Too many people dropped the ball that day to simply ignore it and 3000 people died as a result (not to mention the massive property damage).
astranine 3 years ago 7
how did it get into the building without breaking through the wall. lmoa!
webovisionca 3 years ago
Pres Bush: "US will hunt down and punish those responsible"
Well...
McCullogh 4 years ago
No income tax / No IRS
No war in iraq
No war on drugs
No subtle removal of human / constitutional rights
Ron Paul
jlula1 4 years ago 2
ok, you kooks.. time for your meds..
irish89055 4 years ago
"The genius of you Americans is that you never made clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which makes us wonder at the possibility that there may be something to them we are missing."
—Gamal Abdel Nasser, in the 1950s.
PolandSoldOutInYalta 4 years ago
Mass media on site at the crime of the scene has enough visual evidence to disprove that commercial airplanes were the case in Flight 77 and 93 yet somehow they have been silenced since then.
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
"Our friends and allies naively believe that we have a plan and know what we are doing... they are convinced that we have a secret plan we are not sharing with them... They look at me with disbelief and bewilderment when I tell them there is no secret plan and we are as incompetent as they fear."
—Larry Johnson, former CIA agent, today.
PolandSoldOutInYalta 4 years ago
There ought to be more video of the crash itself. If the government has not released it, they might be afraid of what it would show. OR they might be holding it in reserve to spring it on us if we ever get too popular. That way, they can discredit the entire 9/11 truth movement.
IMO, WTX7 and the molten metal are our strongest pieces of evidence.
RichardC111165 4 years ago
Not that hard to convince other people just how stupid and crazy CTists are either. Nutbags!
ThereIsNoConspiracy 4 years ago
Facts :
88 people reported seeing an airplane crash in the Pentagon
0 people reported seeing a missile
Debris from the airplane was found at the Pentagon
The remains of every passenger except for one were found on the scene.
I guess you just forgot these and only put reports of the first people on scene who still didn't know what had happened.
gabzz103 4 years ago
So... the remains of every passenger was found at the scene and yet, two 6 ton steel and titanium engines were completely vaporized? Oh - ok. Only one 6 ton steel and titantium engine was completely vaporized - the other one shrunk down into a much smaller turbine engine, which we can see in the official photos. Great. I'm glad the 9/11 commission cleared that one up!
chrispyt77 4 years ago
The bodies were badly burned and the engines too. Your point?
If this whole thing was a government cover-up, why wouldn't they have flown ONE plane in a WTC building instead doing all this extra stuff? Why not plant WMDs in Iraq? The whole 9/11 Truth movement has no rationality.
gabzz103 4 years ago
Lord... Give me strength!
The point is that the official story says that plenty of tiny tiny DNA was found, but a massive 6 ton jet was VAPORIZED. Not just very badly burned, but VAPORIZED out of EXISTENCE!
And this is fine with you?
chrispyt77 4 years ago
Google search "Pentagon debris" and click on the second link.
Once again, burned, not vaporized. Conspiracy theorists try to mislead you by saying "vaporized" and refusing to look at the debris.
As for the "tiny tiny DNA" they took all the body parts they could find and they matched them to the passenger list.
gabzz103 4 years ago
Oh please! That's got to be the first plane ever that totally burned immediately upon impact!! Since when does that happen?
vigilance77 4 years ago
It didn't. Once again, check some non-conspiracy theory links when you Google "Pentagon debris".
The conspiracy theorists claim that it "totally burned". They ignore all the debris and dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who saw the plane crash in there.
Think critically. Believe what you think is true, not necessarily what you want to believe.
gabzz103 4 years ago
I am not 100% sure about the plane and pentagon thing, but I am 100% sure about explosives being planted in the WTC towers. I do think still that it's not feasible that a plane could just disintegrate like that.
vigilance77 4 years ago
Number of demolitions who agree that WTC 1 & 2 were CDs
+
# of physicists who agree...
+
# of chemists who agree...
+
# of structural enginners who agree...
= zero
By the way, the planes were destroyed by the columns who acted as egg-slicers. Body parts and debris were all over the pavement after the crashes.
gabzz103 4 years ago
It was a badly botched job of sabotage by the bastards in our government who planned it...whoever said that evil was rational or logical?? Not me!
vigilance77 4 years ago
Your heart's taking over your brain.
Let's say I'm an evil genius and I'm going to sabotage my own country. I'd probably just blow up a truck bomb in the WTC that was much bigger than the one in '93.
You claim that the evil genius would hijack two jets, put explosives in both towers, fly a missile in the Pentagon (in broad daylight), and for absolutely no reason, make a plane crash in a field in Shanksville.
Or maybe Osama's men did it.
gabzz103 4 years ago
No gabzz, I appreciate your thoughtful reply by the way, (instead of some who get belligerant and insulting). I may check out your suggestion but I still know that the whole thing was a poorly executed sabotage by our government who wanted an excuse to go to Iraq and fight.
vigilance77 4 years ago
They had dozens of men take MONTHS placing explosives all over the towers. No one has ever come forward to collect their Pulitzer Prize by coming forward and telling everyone that explosives were placed. Also, NOT A SINGLE PERSON in the towers, which were constantly occupied saw a single piece of explosive prior the collapse. They would've bribed hundred of thousands of engineers, demolitions experts etc.
gabzz103 4 years ago
I read that the WTC towers were closed down, for I'm not sure how long, but closed to the public and anyone that worked there...suspicion that explosives were planted then. Have you not seen the numerous videos of newscasts mentioning over and over explosions going off? You can even hear them yourself!
vigilance77 4 years ago
It would've taken over half a year to plant the explosives. Was it really closed for that long?
Also, if the plane crashed in the building with charges, the charges would've went off right away.
Also, you're ignoring every expert that says that they weren't CDs. If they were, don't you think an overwhelming majority of them would think they were instead of a whoppin 0?
Explosions don't equal bombs. In every large fire, you will hear some.
Think critically.
gabzz103 4 years ago
Half a year? Where you get your info? Do you know every trick of CIA??? Come on! There are videos right in here in You Tube showing the explosions going off before the towers came down..you can see AND hear them!! YOU are not thinking critically because you don't even have all the info!
vigilance77 4 years ago
Demolition experts can take weeks or months to prepare a building for a demolition. No building that was even close of the size of the WTC was ever brought down by CD, which would've taken many times more than the normal time to prepare.
gabzz103 4 years ago
To this comment on how long it takes to do a controlled demolition gabzz..I refer you to Larry Silverstein's interview on PBS talking of how the Fire Dept. decided to "pull" the building #7 at a moment's notice on 9/11. It may still be on Google video or even in here.
vigilance77 4 years ago
I'll leave you the site debunking911 dot com. It answers all your doubts and questions that you've asked so far including the "pull" comment.
gabzz103 4 years ago
Oh, I have heard of that one. Ok. But as I said before..I still think it's going to be a set up job!
vigilance77 4 years ago
ur blind buddie that's ok =) One Love
miketrnt3 4 years ago
What did you think was going to happen when a building that big collapses on itself? Did you not expect a "bang"? The "squibs" that Loose Change identified are just compressed air being shot out of the windows. There is a video of a close up of the fires as the building collapses and it CLEARLY does not have any explosions coming out of it.
How come there isn't a SINGLE demolition expert that believes it was a controlled demolition. Please answer me this.
gabzz103 4 years ago
I ask which demolition experts you're speaking of. Were they hired by the government for comment?
vigilance77 4 years ago
American experts, Italian experts, Chinese experts, the whole nine yards. I recommend you to read a paper written on the collapses on implosionworld dot com.
The fact that there's not a single one (not even North Korean or Iranian) that has spoken saying it was a CD and that you still believe it was is beyond me.
gabzz103 4 years ago
gabzz, I don't mean to be rude, but we could go on and on and on with this....no point!
vigilance77 4 years ago
I will conclude all this by repeating a post that you chose to ignore.
Number of demolitions who agree that WTC 1 & 2 were CDs
+
# of physicists who agree...
+
# of chemists who agree...
+
# of structural enginners who agree...
= zero
gabzz103 4 years ago
Thanks, gab. I'll try to look into it further as per your suggestions....but I think I'm gonna find more evidence to the contrary...respect to you for doing your own research though! ( : D
vigilance77 4 years ago
But they couldn't plant WMDs in Iraq.
I know it won't be easy, but please try to think of the possibility that you might be wrong.
gabzz103 4 years ago
gab, on the WMD's, from what I've read about these people, they think that the general populace are very stupid, and probably didn't even think that far ahead about what if none were found? Like..."We just want to make it to Iraq and and get the ball rolling in a way that could last indefinitely!!"
vigilance77 4 years ago
Please do check the site I recommended. If you want to be known as a truth seeker, you must look at ALL the evidence, not only the one that goes by your beliefs.
If you look at the whole clear picture, you should realize that 9/11 conspiracy theories have no scientific merit and simply don't make sense. The conspiracy sites are always very misleading and manipulative with what they choose as "evidence".
gabzz103 4 years ago
Do you know about the Project for a New American Century in which the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" is mentioned in order to go to war?? Aaron Russo's acquaintance with a Rockefeller, Nick R. to be exact revealed to him in one of their conversations that there "was going to be an event" shortly before 9/11. You can hear it from Russo's mouth by going to Alex Jones interview with Aaron Russo right here.
vigilance77 4 years ago
Uh - many people reported seeing something that was definitely not a Boeing 757. That's one of the reasons that the 9/11 report is so controversial. It leaves out a lot of eye witness testimony. Also, the report states that all passengers were identifiiable by their remains and DNA, but much of the plane including a 6 ton steel and titanium jet turbine engine was 'vaporized'. No rational person can accept this without question.
chrispyt77 4 years ago
Google search "Pentagon witnesses". We have witnesses (names included) describing and AMERICAN AIRLINES plane crashing in the Pentagon. If such testimony of people not seeing a plane that you claim exists, please present it to me.
I agree that no rational person could believe that every passenger was identified and the jet was completely vaporized. However, your statement isn't even true (as well as every other claim by 9/11 CTs).
gabzz103 4 years ago
If one believes in the government's theory, they would be endorsing a conspiracy. The government's story is a conspiracy theory.
nachoman1968 4 years ago
Here's some simple math. The height of a Boeing 757 is approx. 42 ft. The height of the Pentagon is 77ft. In order for the plane to hit only the first floor of the building, the engines would have to be below ground level. Look at how low the vapor trail is in the Pentagon security cam.
muzicmaker2001 4 years ago
DEBUNKING911 DOT COM Will prove that any CT's are wrong!
ThereIsNoConspiracy 4 years ago
Do you know how much money the CIA, NSA and all the other secret agencies get? A fuckin lot!
You think they can't afford to pay a whole lotta staff to creatively debunk the impossible? Most Americans are stupid enough to believe that steel buildings can collapse by fire. It's not a hard task to convince Joe American.
chrispyt77 4 years ago
I guess it's not that hard to convince every chemistry expert, every demolition expert, structural engineer, every physicist as well. After all, none of these people are truthers. Would you take their word on what they're best at or take the word of a college reject/hack filmmaker?
Please explain how all these experts are wrong and how you're right. Is it just "because"? Is it because you just "know it", because "Dylan Avery told me so"?
Think critically.
gabzz103 4 years ago
I have not exhausted all sources of information on the subject but I have watched an MIT graduate engineer explain how the WTC came down..explosives, period. It's a horrible crime and one that should be addressed again for the sake of almost 3,000 souls who died.
vigilance77 4 years ago
those are 100% garunteed facts that he was behind this? i dont think so...i dont care wat he was doing that day, give me stuff like why it was a missile and not a plane, controlled demolition...prove that that kinda stuff happened...
krispykreme82603 4 years ago
Planes are big. The white blur in the 5 frame vid - you cant tell me thats a plane! get real. Nor can you tell me the new vid shows a plane. It's not clearly visible. So grainy and blurry. When can we see the real stuff?
NEVER. It doesn't show what they want us to see: A commercial jetliner.
chrispyt77 4 years ago
wheres your proof? even if it wasnt terrorists, even if it was thermite that brought down the towers, how can you be so positive it was bush? oklahoma city bombing wasnt any govts fault, some solo guy brought down that building (not actually brought down, but u no wat im saying)...but still, u have no proof...give me 3 solid 100% garunteed facts that this was bushs fault
krispykreme82603 4 years ago
Flight 93 left only a hole in the earth, nothing more than small pieces. Was that fake too?
fastfreedom 5 years ago
united 93 was very much real
krispykreme82603 5 years ago
krispykreme82603, FLIGHT 93 WAS 100 PERCENT BOGUS AND CONSPIRED BY THE BUSH REGIME, IN 2001 CELL PHONES DID NOT WORK ON BOARD ANY AIR CRAFT UNLESS YOU WERE WITH-IN 2300 METERS FROM A TOWER, I KNOW I NEVER COULD GET MY NEW CELL TO WORK AND ANY TECH WITH SPRINT OR WHAT HAVE YOU WILL AGREE. THEY WERE HEROS EVEN THOUGH THE CALLS WERE FAKE AND THE 777 WAS SHOT DOWN DOWN HENCE ALL THE DEBRIS SPREAD FOR MILES, THE HOLE 15 FEET ACROSS MEANING THE NOSE CONE ONLY MADE IMPACT..
AngelStephen911truth 4 years ago
wow, and how would u know unless u witnessed it? how do you know all of this is true? did george bush admit it? huh? and it was a 757 not a 777 which just proves u dont know what your talking about...if u cant even get the type of plane right how is anyone supposed to believe what you say is true?
krispykreme82603 4 years ago
you guys have to watch the whole video guys....
Dorkster81 5 years ago
dude, the scientific part of the video says that the plane crashing into the pentagon is not true and then at the end it says that it is true. :S confusing ...
andreluxury 5 years ago
plus, how would the terrorist have known that that part of the pentagon was the emptiest and being re-inforced? he didnt have instructions on where to hit he was just told to crash into it. even if he did get instructions its hard to tell which side is which up in the air, maybe its just that lucky 20% chance that he hit the stronger and less populated side...there was a 1 in 5 chance, thats not that much...now if the pentagon were really 100 sided then itd be a bit more suspicious....
krispykreme82603 5 years ago
doesnt anyone find it strange how only this one person found every "loophole" in the 9/11 attacks? have any of you actually done any research on whether this is all true or were u all just gullible enough to accept it?
krispykreme82603 5 years ago
The relatively light wings & tail were shredded when they struck the Pentagon's thick masonry wall at 500 mph. The entry hole was plenty big enough. Thousands of plane fragments were found inside & outside, & a few larger ones as well, & photos WERE indeed released. First responders found body fragments & DNA analysis matched them to all but one of the FL 77 passengers. There's no evidence FL 77 went anywhere else. Absolutely none.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
all the planes envolved in 911 wernt even scheduled to fly that day!! thats the biggest conpiracy by far!!! dont ya think!
wagyourtail 5 years ago
So what? Are you claiming that they DIDN'T fly that day?
PoetryHound 5 years ago
the pentagon was hit by a cruise missle..
dexter12322222222222 5 years ago
That's just silly.
SCReuter 5 years ago
says who? besides this guy and any other people idiotic enough to believe it. i cant find anything else on the internet that says anything about a cruise missile hitting the pentagon...yur following someone elses THEORY! these arent proven facts
krispykreme82603 5 years ago
this first guy talking in this video, has a 1 hour and 30 minute vid. Watch that one, wish ic oudl find it. The 2nd guy talking doesn't have hard facts, you're right, but the 1st guy, did extensive research
Dorkster81 5 years ago
here's a good question...where's the plane that "didn't" hit the pentagon? Where are the people that "didn't die" on this plane? im sure their kids miss them alot
jerentitus 5 years ago
heres a good questions....how did the terrorists know where to fly?...
twisted2006 5 years ago
this shit is real. anyway who denys this is a little bitch
oysteranatomy 5 years ago
Look at the fact ans not some stupid conspiracy movie or website and you will realise that it was in fact a plane you moron.And yes jet fuel will melt aluminum,havnt you ever seen aluminum melt in a bon-fire.Sad that you all get your info from a 19 year old punk.If you do the research you can see there is quite alot of debree on the pentagon lawn.
fifafoofoo 5 years ago
your a fucking idiot mate
louiebongers 5 years ago
Engine remnant - low-pressure turbine:
www.rcfp.*org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200030-1.jpg
Main landing gear:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_lg.jpg
Miscellaneous debris:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_misc.jpg
Exit hole debris:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_ehd.jpg
(Remove asterisks from links.)
SCReuter 5 years ago
American Airlines Flight 77 Wreckage
Fuselage sections:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_fd.jpg
Engine remnant - Rolls-Royce RB211 combustion chamber:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_e1.jpg
Engine remnant - compressor rotor:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_e2.jpg
SCReuter 5 years ago
9/11 was most likely a "false flag" or "Strategy of tension" operation conducted by far right-wing elements associated with those in power to scare and galavanize the public to push through legislation and foreign policy that would never have happened otherwise, and conveniently made some poeple very rich.
Navywxman 5 years ago
I see another truth seeker use the words "false-flag operations" one more time...
SCReuter 5 years ago
now the evidence of controlled demolitions at the WTC building is overwhelming, free fall speed with NO resistance from lower floors, tons of concrete PULVERIZED the 47 steel columns blown into 30 ft sections, classic demolition squibs, fire almost out, fire not hot enough to melt steel, wtc7 wasn't even hit yet it also fell in free fall speed straight down into it's own footprint the list of evidence for controlled demolitions is a very long one.
andystokie 5 years ago
I don't tend to believe things until ive witnessed them with my own eyes, ive never seen a plane hit the pentagon, therefore i cannot believe one hit, the evidence we have suggests it wasn't a plane, well not a boeing 747 anyway.
andystokie 5 years ago
4 Minutes into this wee see the trajectory lines up with the Washington Monument and hits the renovated records section that keeps track of the budget. It would have been easier to hit the building head on but this is how it was hit.
websuspect 5 years ago
A Boeing 757 en route from Dulles International Airport near Washington to Los Angeles. The plane was carrying 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots. It crashed into the Pentagon about 9:40 a.m. ET.
HERE! Now if you doubt this you trot you asses up to Dulles and tell THEM, the Air Controllers, the clerks, the baggage people, that flight 77 never left Dulles. I dare you!
Takkyon 5 years ago
Looks like I have to do people's research for them because they can think of conspiracy bullshit all day but refuse to follow up on any of it. Get out of the porn and the gaming and into the fact finding people!
Takkyon 5 years ago
Hey Midex, Mothman, The Jersey Devil, and Bigfoot just stopped by in their UFO. Their buddies the Greys dropped them off and will be back for them in the morning. Care to IM with them?
I promise I'm REALLY telling the truth.
Takkyon 5 years ago
CNN are a bunch of conspiracy theorists??? PUHLEASE
ibjeepin 5 years ago
Youre right dude, theyd all be unemployed if the truth was released, Americans have to be scared coz its more profitable that way
sirmarkalot32 5 years ago
"Youre right dude, theyd all be unemployed if the truth was released. . ."
Spare me.
SCReuter 5 years ago
WHERE IS FLIGHT 77???????
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof.
Show me the intact Boeing 777 & the live souls that
were aboard her otherwise this is paranoid bullsh**
Takkyon 5 years ago
Takkyon. You demand doesn't make sense. Flight 77 could have been dropped in the Ocean mate. Flight 77 could have been stolen and re-painted. Where is the video from the Pentagon attack? What reason can you think of that is legitimate as to them refusing to release the 80 videos FBI seized from neighbouring buildings' security cameras?
Midex 5 years ago
Listen to yourself. Flight 77 COULD'VE been dropped into the Ocean? Try using a line like that in a court of law when they find coke in your car and say "your Honor it COULDVE been planted by the police or elves or fairies!" Geesh.
We have RELIGIOUS idiots that are willing to commit suicide to kill us, and people are grasping at this X Files conspiracy shit. Show me an intact or a crashed Flight 77 then I'll start accepting something else.
Takkyon 5 years ago
Give me 2 or more CREDIBLE radar operators that tracked flight 77 and its transponder code going anywhere other than the Pentagon and you'll convert me! Short of that , it is just another Mel Gibson Conspiracy Theory, with someone reading Catcher In The Rye!
Takkyon 5 years ago
Contrary to what you're asking, are there any evidence that there were in fact a Boeing 777 with a flight full of passengers? People need to be given the right, just as you have, to question the legitimacy of any claims especially regarding an issue so serious.It is not "bullsh**" at all. Sometimes, the best cover up story usually entails logic to make it more plausable and what better explanation for a building to just explode than the "a plane had struck it".
BillyHub 5 years ago
The flight was scheduled to depart at 8:10 AM EDT, but actually departed at 8:20. [1] It was later determined that three of the hijackers had been stopped before boarding the flight because they failed the metal detector test, but were nonetheless allowed to enter the plane.
Takkyon 5 years ago
video of the cruise missile hitting pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz-Qi5EJmXA
maxuzi 5 years ago
think about this: why the pentagon as a target? it is a flat, huge structure where even if a plane did hit it, it would do very little to the building as a whole. Very unaesthetic as an attack... absurd as a terror strategy. If the US govn. wanted us to really believe that we were under attack, the senate/congress/white house would have been hit. Instead, they killed regular people.
pj1123 5 years ago
pj1123, avoid simple inductive refuations of a conspuracy theory. The flawed assumption is that you know the grand plan. Just stick to the facts and then put them together to start draw a picture. FACT: WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Inferance: 911 was an inside job. Why? Proves Foreknowledge, Involvment, Cover-up.
Midex 5 years ago
Fallacy:
"fact: WTC7 was a controlled demolition"
There is no evidence for this except for sparse mis-quotes and intentionally misrepresented, cherrypicked facts.
Falco98 5 years ago
Midex, erm..1 question. If i am not mistaken. Did your president not back bush? did your president send troops to Iraq? The 911 attacks, began the war on terror. First afganistaan (bullshit war), when the main interest was Iraq. So, when the president of australia watched this footage...ermmmmmmm..did he not, i mean him being an educated man and voted into power by the australian people, did he not see the bullshit (no wings, parts of a plane blah blah?
AahRO 5 years ago
AahRO, you are assuming that our Prime Minister is honest. We can't do anything in Australia. We are ruled by tyranny far greater than America. The US was the last bastion of democracy and now because they fooled you with 911 you are letting them shred the Bill of Rights in the name of Terror.
Midex 5 years ago
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm
PkofPk 5 years ago
911myths.com
PkofPk 5 years ago
Because he even knows what a cruise missle is, it shows that he is capable of the distinction between that and a 757. Who told him to change his story?
randomcommentguy 5 years ago
Watch carefully. At 2:20min, an eyewitness says he saw a "jet", an "airliner" of "American Airlines". Now, search youtube for "911 pentagon video explanation", and forward to 4:30min. This is the SAME EYEWITNESS, this time sure that he saw a "cruise missle". Which statement did he make first, and why did he change his story?
randomcommentguy 5 years ago
You can tell which statement he made first - look at the parked car in the "missile with wings" one - in the "757 one you see that car driving off!!11" So somebody told him to change his story OR he was using "Missile with wings" as a metaphor and they have edited out the full speech so they can use it to discredit the truth by releasing it later along with plane footage, thus discrediting the WHOLE movement. We know WTC7 was demo job - thus It was ALL inside JOb.
Midex 5 years ago
Psychology Today Conspiracy Theories Explained
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20050125-000003.html
PkofPk 5 years ago
The official story insults the morality and intelligence of the american people. 60% of americans want 911 reopened - if you live in a free democratic society you explain to me why your polls are not used for demoractic action - why do your elected government do what ever they want for four years? You are not FREE. You are slaves.
Midex 5 years ago
MORALITY!!!! bah, we dont have moraltity, we dont have virtues either, only the things we buy at wal mart have those, thats why every Sunday theres so mauch people at wal mart that you cant move your cart
sirmarkalot32 5 years ago
If people are so God damn sure that the government has nothing to hide, then why won't they just allow an independant investigation, or even reopen the 911 commission? Until they do, we have absolutely no reason to believe any of what they've told us.
911 commission: $15 million
Clinton BJ: $50 million
WHY??????
leitermann 5 years ago
Good video.
Check this out:
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm
There are so many discrepancies with 9/11 that need to be questioned. Open your eyes, and awake!
334251 5 years ago
That was embarrassing.
The movie managed to lose all its credibility within the first seventeen seconds when claiming a Boeing 757 was never even found at the Pentagon.
Really, are these people living in fantasyland?
SCReuter 5 years ago
The "movie" isn't claiming that no plane was ever found, it simply starts off with a CNN reporter who reported that he didn't see any plane there. The video also takes into account that witnesses DID see a plane at the Pentagon, in fact it shows a witness saying that. The video also mentions that plane wreckage was found. The video is clearly NOT saying that no plane hit the pentagon. The question is "What plane hit the pentagon?" Was it really an 80 ton boeing 757? Did you watch the video?
thetruthwillout 5 years ago
Thetruthwillout,
I was referring to the video that "334251" posted. Not the above piece of footage.
SCReuter 5 years ago
ok mate - so I guess the Pentagon refuses to release ANY of the dozens of videos they seized from teh area of the attack becuase of national security or something? The People of America ARE the rulers - they demand the footage - where is it? Sheraton Hotel footage. Where is it?
Midex 5 years ago
The FBI never took a videotape from the Sheraton National Hotel.
And the government can't just release confiscated tapes whenever it feels like. There's legal issues.
SCReuter 5 years ago
You see, we don't have thousands of people saying "We want proof that planes hit the twin towers" - Why? Because we have proof. We have video footage. But we dont' have any of Pentagon. Further there is nothing in the photos proving wreckage - no bodies, no luggage, no wing sections on the lawn - nothing.
Midex 5 years ago
Yes but can we be sure that they had people IN them and they were not actually radio controlled airliners meant to appear to be hijacked airliners? The Secret Government may have had fake radio controlled jets flown into the Towers so we would have an excuse to go to war with the peaceful Muslims.
Yeah! It was all staged maybe, just like the Moon landing that we all KNOW was faked!
Takkyon 5 years ago
Have you seen the 757 at the pentagon? How did the wings disappear into the hole? What about the 9ft 6 tonne engines? Did they disintergrate on impact?
Midex 5 years ago
"Have you seen the 757 at the pentagon?" -- Midex
Yes, I've seen the remains of the American Airlines Boeing 757, and provided numerous photographs in a post below.
"How did the wings disappear into the hole?" -- Midex
A good 2/3 of the flimsy light weight wings didn't penetrate the Pentagon. They were converted into confetti immediately upon impact.
SCReuter 5 years ago
"What about the 9ft 6 tonne engines?" -- Midex
Remnants of the Rolls-Royce engines were recovered:
(Remove asterisk from links.)
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_e1.jpg
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_e2.jpg
www.rcfp.*org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200030-1.jpg
The right engine even struck a generator just before impacting the Pentagon:
scr.bantheinter.*net/albums/userpics/a77_gen.jpg
Anymore questions?
SCReuter 5 years ago
SCReuter, how about you tell us why five years ago the FBI seized all the surrounding security camera footage from hotels, gas stations, and have never released it back to the public? Why don't you explain the collapse of WTC7?
Midex 5 years ago
1. We only know of two places that the FBI seized security tapes from: the Citgo Gas Station and Doubletree Hotel.
2. The videos were confiscated because they could have potentially helped with the investigation. Obviously.
3. The Citgo footage has since been made available to the public, proving nothing of interest was captured. As for the Doubletree tape, it's planned to be released by November 9.
SCReuter 5 years ago
Link to Citgo tape (remove asterisk):
www.youtube.*com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk
Turns out all the cameras were used to safeguard the store, rather than being pointed at the Pentagon or toward the sky.
Go figure.
SCReuter 5 years ago
the mass media have much more power than the truth.
but it is important that you show this to people.
the masses cant stay that stupid.
Kampy187 5 years ago
I love the ending.
Eccostar 5 years ago
Yeah, it's absurd, isn't it?
Here's more conclusive evidents that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon:
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
Yet for some odd reason the above video decided to ignore all of it.
Go figure.
SCReuter 5 years ago
you call that evidence? How about this two hour testimony by a witness at the site? I guess you think everyone has so much free time on their hands to conduct millions of hours of research - I geuss that fact that 60% of americans want 911 opened again doesn't mean anything in a "free" democractic society. I guess we have to wait for King Bush to let us reinvestigate 911 officially? The public research is calling it TREASON
Midex 5 years ago
ey it wasnt empty,about 40 people in pentagon died..
FULANODETAL 5 years ago
it says "almost" empty.
And 40 people is quite less than the thousands people that work in the Pentagon.
nervxp 5 years ago
20,000 people work in that building. The part of the building hit was under renovations. The people who died were construction workers. Everyone see the photos of emergency workers being scrubbed off and decontaminted in their toxic suits? What toxins were at that site? The dogs two were scrubbed down and washed on site. Depleted Uranium explain that punch-out whole in the third ring?
Midex 5 years ago
the media(the fourth branch) isn't gonna cover the stories of what really happpened, when they do have people on media shows with the 9/11 truth movment they always paint them as 'nut job conspiracy theorists".
leftovercrizzack 5 years ago
Uh, that's because the majority of them ARE nutjob conspiracy theorists.
SCReuter 5 years ago
Believe what you want SCReuter. Nobodies stopping you. There is a scientific methodology, and academic methodology that is the foundation of modernity. These people you call "conspiracy nutjobs" are using the same rationale that brought you the internet - LOGIC.
Midex 5 years ago
Come again?
SCReuter 5 years ago
why would they do this anyway. If that hitler(bush) wants to take over the world he can just say so!!!!!!
serbian04 5 years ago
When are the media networks gonna show some fucking balls and tell us what REALLY happened at the pentagon, as this footage shows. What the fuck is really going on?
bagzie 5 years ago
The media networks are pary of the criminal organisation. They control who gets into power because they control YOU. Dont' rely on the media anymore - you have the internet. Stop being like a child waiting for daddy to say the word. Grow up - you control your destiny or else your destiny will control you.
Midex 5 years ago
I think you've got me wrong. I dont believe the official story either. I think it was a missile, or possible a Predator. I also think the WTC were blown up. And, you are accusing the Americans of being lazy fucks, which they might be. But I'm Canadian...
randomcommentguy 5 years ago
That rocks. The 9/11 scenerio give me the chills.
StuandCol 5 years ago
I'm still not sure It really did hit. But what ever I guess we have to believe what the government says.
thesoundofdistortion 5 years ago
You should believe the abundance of factual evidence that supports the official story:
A) Human remains recovered from the Pentagon crash site were positively identified as belonging to passengers aboard American Airlines Flight 77.
B) Heaps of shredded aircraft debris scattered across the crash site prove that a Boeing 757 -- in this case Flight 77 -- struck the Pentagon.
C) Dozens of eyewitness accounts saw a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon.
Et cetera, et cetera.
SCReuter 5 years ago