@CxGabriel92 Not always the case. In fact the shader on Xbox can process game graphics faster and with better shadings and textures but it's barely noticeable
@Distance9240 gran turismo 5 lol i have had the funnest gaming moments with the gt series it is fun to those who are good at it come on raceing at 260 miles per hour with a car that took 10 hours to supe up just to barely come in first at the last second i cant think of a better feel
@Distance9240 ..whether it be top speed or acceleration. Again, that's just a small example. As for the the nigh-day transition, it's not true 24h lapse so I don't think it will be that long (there's a video showing this), unlike those endurance races ha. As for the weather, it's completely dynamic so it's going to be fun having to change racing strategies mid race. Again, I respect your opinion, mine's just different.
@Distance9240 I understand, it's your opinion and I respect that. But after playing both Forza (2-3) and the GT series (since the very first one), for me the GT series feels more sim than Forza. Both great games mind you, but when it comes down to the simulation aspect, I get more satisfaction from GT. For a small example, in GT4 (the full release game), I would spend hours customizing the car settings for every individual track to make sure I get I have the upper hand..
@Distance9240 Good to know that you played GT5 and tested it's new physics and features before anyone else has. I hope you're not judging GT5 with Prologue, because Prologue is based off of GTHD, which in turn is based off of GT4. Look up the new info and videos of GT5 from TGS.
And the real question is, if you wanted to race with a Model T Ford, is it included in the game or not? Look at the glass half full, not half empty.
@Chmielok Its a frame rate analysis, the difference is that the ps3 gets a lower framerate at some points but the 360 has a higher frame rate in the game it is capped at 60 fps, so it should remain constant but the problem there is it creates more tearing as opposed to ps3 where there is less tearing. Still, you would notice lag on both consoles and tearing if your're a pc gamer. So in general, ps3 runs it better. But 360 could do good for racing games etc.
The (minim) problem of Framerates for the Ps3 is because developpers are lazy to develop a game using the 7 cores of the console. It's way harder than developing a game on Xbox360. Ps3 system is way more powerful but way more complex. That's the main problem. Play Uncharted 2 and GOW 3, those games runs 60 fps constent and are beautiful !!
the problem is how do we know this is a fair comparison?Just bluntly putting it out there.... How do we know its not Rigged. if your reading this DigitalFoundry i dont hate you i just need a lil more proof than this maybe what program you used :P
also xbox wins not only on frame rate but on graphics too thats why sony sucks ps2 is shit compared to xbox and ps3 is shit compared to xbox 360... i dont know why oy are doing this...
Frames are individual images that make up the video. TV is broadcast at either 25 or 30fps. But most people prefer games running at 60fps because it looks like a smoother video.
I'd imagine they were both v-synced though which is quite good...Given that my PC will get 300fps out of COD4 unbound... so not a huge achievement.
Why can't people just stfu and get along, It seems you're all mad because your e-peen got struck, Oh well deal with it. The 360 is a good console, The ps3 is a good console. If you like one but dislike the other, Then buy the one you like and stfu, If you like both..Then buy both and stfu :). I prefer PC over all though ;), But I own an elite.
its not about which console has better specs, clearly PS3........but the developers need to understand the tech to get full potential......which is why the 360 version is better.
you can't convince me xbox stays a constant 60 Frames per second constantly while ps3 drops 20 to 30 frames when there's not alot going on xbox frame rates only drop like once in this video almost like it was rigged
And when i say "LAZY" developers its not an excuse, do some research you fuck. Game developers say its different to develop for ps3. Dumbass, get off Bill Gate's Cock.
I cant really see what the lower frame rate does. I know a higher frame rate means smoother animations, but i cannot tell the difference, and shouldnt PS3 have faster frame rates? Maybe this might change in Modern Warfare 2.
Superior?? Everybody knows PS3 has the superio hardware smartass. Compare exclusives not multiplat games. PS3 is different to develop for so of course game developers always have problems.
You again. Its TRUE that game developers get LAZY when it comes to PS3 get your facts right you fucking moron, 360 aint superior COMPARE THE EXCLUSIVE TITLES GRAPHICS.
Ok compare Oblivion, compare GTA IV, compare Fallout 3, compare Mercenaries 2, compare Half Life 2... ALL those games looks better on PS3. Its not about multiplataform games you fucking dumbass. Some look better on 360 (very few) and some others look beter on ps3, if you were smart you would compare EXCLUSIVES. The Developer of Heavy Rain said it couldnt run on 360 LMFAO shows how shitty it is. most of the developers say ps3 is more powerfull so stop whining noob
Jesus you're dumb. THE GAME DEVELOPER said that the 360 CANNOT run the game, it doesnt have enough POWER, there you go, you dont a have a PS3, you're crying like a baby LOL
LMAO Who said ps3 couldnt run Alan wake?? Stop saying bullshit. Uncharted 2 looks better than Alan Wake. PS3 has 512MB XDR RAM you fuckin moron. Its more efficient than 360.
Oh nobody cares about what Game Developers say?? They are the ones who develop the game not you, they know you asshole and they say PS3 is more powerfull so shut the fuck up. PS3 has 7 Cores (SPE) running at 3.2Ghz each, bitch.
@GeForce47 also you have millions and millions of children who buy for the 360. More of a market so more time gets devoted for 360 optimization. All about money....
@DialgaMarine3 Yes, but they are few and far between because it is difficult to harness the Cell's architecture. What's it to me if they are going to release one game every few years?
On top of that, it's the gameplay not the graphics that make a game good. Sony should focus their exclusives to be fun, not just pretty graphics by making more games like God of War 3 and LBP.
@RipperLord Killzone is good, MAG is excellent, Uncharted 2 is one of the most amazing games ever, Infamous is good, and R&C is awesome. Not sure what youre trying to get at, but PS3 exclusives are great and at the same time have great graphics.
I think youre thinking of the 360. I havnt seen a good 360 exclusive in the last 3 years besides Halo Reach and Fable 2/3. Most 360 exclusives die out within a month because MS puts most emphasis on Mutiplatformers.
@RipperLord Oh, and what do you mean by only one PS3 game coming out every 3 years? Sony already has a lineup of 8 exclusives coming out in 2011. Youve got KZ3, Infamous 2, LBP2, Uncharted 3, Sly 4, Socom 4, Resistance 3, and Twisted Metal. All looking to be excellent games.
When you think about it, PS3 has way more exclusive titles than 360, because while MS focuses mainly on multiplatformers, Sony puts much more emphasis into the exclusives. In short: PS3 has more games.
@DialgaMarine3 As I said before, PS3 needs more fun games. Metacritic doesn't lie, so I'll let them work out the average fun factor of games.
Halo Reach is already about to surpass Uncharted 2 (released about a year before) in sales, so MS can let that speak for itself. Halo 3 sold 8 million (last count), Gears of War 1+2 sold 5 million each, ODST (an expansion more or less) sold 3 million etc.
7 cell processor to xbox 3 processors , more shaders than xbox, and can produce more pollygons than xbox can ps3 they can handle twice as much as xbox 360 and games can be bigger on ps3 thanks to bluray
well the 8th core is used to spread the load to the 7 SPEs but i multiple platform ported games the 8th core does all the job itself as it acts like a PPC core that the 360 has 3 of hence worse performance, PS3 is more powerfull but who the fuck gives a shit huh?
its the exclusive games that count and there the ps3 wins imo with uncharted 1 and 2 and the gran turismo series.
You're just one of those kids who copy/paste the console specs from Wikipedia and compare them.
The fact is that multiplatform games often are a bit better on 360. I would care less about the graphics and more about controller and gameplay though.
For me the 360 controller is much more comfortable than dualshock 3.
and your the guy with no life who reads these comments looking for what he believes is stupid kids for the record I don't use wikipedia for my console specs multiplatform games run better on the system they are developed for but technically speaking ps3 is a beast compared to 360 the 360 controller is big and wonky while playstation controller barely changed and is very familiar
a cheap old 9800GT will do 1280 x 1024 (twice the resolution) 4 x AA @ 60FPS easily. a now low priced 4870 can do it @ 1920 x 1200. which is four times the resolution....
well its a compromise. its admirable how infinity ward have tried to acheive 60 frames a second, but unfortunate the resolution has been hacked down. 360 scales it better, but really its not much of a consolation
I liked the PS3, but I just don't understand what your paying for when you buy it. It's far far inferior to the 360. Even if it has better hardware, it's frame rates are far lower than the Xbox's and it's visuals are darker and have more pop out textures and glitches. I don't understand why anyone would buy that huge and expensive system. Btw, I'm not a fanboy, I don't own a ps3 or a 360. I'm a PC gamer, which I think is better than ps3 and xbox.
you are paying for technologies sony want to push into other markets and used the ps3 as a springboard. for example i think we all know that this generation 360 has done just fine with dvd.....shock horror if games needed two discs then they got them and so is the case with pc games far advanced of the consoles!!!! bluray will be needed probably next generation, but it seems pretty clear to me its mostly unused inside ps3 but for sony's personal battle to win against HD DVD.
Yeah that's totally true, the ps3 has really nice components inside, buts it's clearly not being put to any good use, and it's just annoying that they keep trying to push there own new technologies on people.
some sort of next gen format will be needed for the next gen consoles. im sure of it, you could go on and on with multiple discs, but in the end dvd wont have a good enough read speed and you will be swapping too often. bluray for THIS gen, ps3, was just too soon, too early. if the console has just a 2x drive. a 4x drive, it would be considerably faster than 360's dvd drive on average! maybe ps4 will have a 8x BD drive, and THEN sony will have made a good choice. ps3 though, too early IMO...
yeah 360 does sustain its framerate better clearly, both games are very similar visually its a tie if it werent for this video pointing to how the 360 version runs smoother and faster when the going gets tough. disappointing how they only run 600P on console. but then again, thats where the pc version comes in.....
well it can see more than that lol. its not hard to discern up to 70 frames per second. some claim they can tell apart 100 or 120 but personally i cannot, i can however easily see the difference up to 70 or 80 frames. generally 60 is enough and thats what fast moving games should aim for
human eye can easily see 60 frames per second, and more. the difference between a 60FPS game and a 30FPS game is instantly noticeable, especially if you are playing it because it feels faster, the control response feels much slicker and the camera changes direction much more smoothly etc
well i'd only expect the framerate to drop , especially if it's played native 1080p . but it's not cause i've heard when the xbox upscales cod4 to 1080p the framerate halves...
yes because the ps3 and 360 came out in 2006 and 2005. I wouldnt expect a 250 pound pc bought in 2005 to run this game like the 360 can or ps3 can when they cost about 250 pounds-300 pounds
Well, my penis can actually travel through time, so he told me.
Last week he went back to 1944 and fucked Anne Frank, but before he came home he went to December 2009, and went on a gaming site to look up the Xbox360 GOTY, and there wasn't many good games there.
Or so he says, he could have just been disoriented from fucking Anne Frank.
Really, funny considering your a 14 year old. Now there, im guessing you did;nt watch all his other framerate analysis videos. Xbox Won all of them. So thats. Xbox has: Better Framerates Better Online Services [Fee] Better Games More Members More Sales And Exclusive DLC [FO3, ETC.] PS3: A Few Good Games [KZ2 Isnt one of them cause i do have it. and so far its just no where near as good as i thought it would be.] Crappy Services.
Best CoD and one of the best games of all time !
Scorponizer 4 days ago
pc is the best
ENeMy227 10 months ago
PS3 forever anyway !
xbox sucks... save your money and don't buy this shit !
JointuriAprinse 11 months ago
the frames are lower on the PS3 because the graphics are better
CxGabriel92 11 months ago
@CxGabriel92 i enjoy playing my games smoothly...so im going with xbox :)(:
DuDekilleR7 11 months ago
@CxGabriel92 Not always the case. In fact the shader on Xbox can process game graphics faster and with better shadings and textures but it's barely noticeable
lethalbullet1 9 months ago
Ps3 has much better lighting and textures
DIRTYCHEESE 1 year ago
@Distance9240 gran turismo 5 lol i have had the funnest gaming moments with the gt series it is fun to those who are good at it come on raceing at 260 miles per hour with a car that took 10 hours to supe up just to barely come in first at the last second i cant think of a better feel
ps3rocks15 1 year ago
@ps3rocks15 sex is a better feeling........im just saying
darkdecendent 1 year ago
@darkdecendent true so true but i said gaming moment
ps3rocks15 1 year ago
@ps3rocks15 ahhh so you did :) well played lol
darkdecendent 1 year ago
DigitalFaggotry
TraNWhiZ 1 year ago
@Distance9240 ..whether it be top speed or acceleration. Again, that's just a small example. As for the the nigh-day transition, it's not true 24h lapse so I don't think it will be that long (there's a video showing this), unlike those endurance races ha. As for the weather, it's completely dynamic so it's going to be fun having to change racing strategies mid race. Again, I respect your opinion, mine's just different.
JKwan77 1 year ago
@Distance9240 I understand, it's your opinion and I respect that. But after playing both Forza (2-3) and the GT series (since the very first one), for me the GT series feels more sim than Forza. Both great games mind you, but when it comes down to the simulation aspect, I get more satisfaction from GT. For a small example, in GT4 (the full release game), I would spend hours customizing the car settings for every individual track to make sure I get I have the upper hand..
JKwan77 1 year ago
@Distance9240 Good to know that you played GT5 and tested it's new physics and features before anyone else has. I hope you're not judging GT5 with Prologue, because Prologue is based off of GTHD, which in turn is based off of GT4. Look up the new info and videos of GT5 from TGS.
And the real question is, if you wanted to race with a Model T Ford, is it included in the game or not? Look at the glass half full, not half empty.
JKwan77 1 year ago
Don't see the difference at all.
Chmielok 1 year ago
@Chmielok Its a frame rate analysis, the difference is that the ps3 gets a lower framerate at some points but the 360 has a higher frame rate in the game it is capped at 60 fps, so it should remain constant but the problem there is it creates more tearing as opposed to ps3 where there is less tearing. Still, you would notice lag on both consoles and tearing if your're a pc gamer. So in general, ps3 runs it better. But 360 could do good for racing games etc.
Avataryoutuification 1 year ago
Wait... I don't see a difference... ':/
CheifPaco 1 year ago
@CheifPaco Read my above post.
Avataryoutuification 1 year ago
@Avataryoutuification K thanks
CheifPaco 1 year ago
@Distance9240 gt 5 isnt even out yet dont make up things you dont know yet
ps3rocks15 1 year ago
this is why all call of duty trailers are made on xbox 360 LOL
peterados 1 year ago
The (minim) problem of Framerates for the Ps3 is because developpers are lazy to develop a game using the 7 cores of the console. It's way harder than developing a game on Xbox360. Ps3 system is way more powerful but way more complex. That's the main problem. Play Uncharted 2 and GOW 3, those games runs 60 fps constent and are beautiful !!
phil1818 1 year ago
the problem is how do we know this is a fair comparison?Just bluntly putting it out there.... How do we know its not Rigged. if your reading this DigitalFoundry i dont hate you i just need a lil more proof than this maybe what program you used :P
Bortelliify 1 year ago
@Distance9240 lol Forza is a joke, even compared to Prologue
TheFenerli10 1 year ago
4:03 does a good job of showing the drawbacks of the old gpu architecture that went into the ps3.
TonkatrainHONKHONK 1 year ago
also xbox wins not only on frame rate but on graphics too thats why sony sucks ps2 is shit compared to xbox and ps3 is shit compared to xbox 360... i dont know why oy are doing this...
Mod920 1 year ago
PC ftw
ComissarGramsci 1 year ago 13
You cant compare the 2 only by one game,one graphic card handles one game better then the other and the other way around
laikros 1 year ago
3:21 massive PS3 Frame drop
MadKiller231 1 year ago
Ps3 has HIGHER graphics optimization though. And so, little drop in fps.
bladechaos13 1 year ago
@bladechaos13 lol ps3 hasnt got a higher graphics it was ported from the 360
=)
pc4gamers 1 year ago
PS3 seems to drop a lot
LilRunt5 1 year ago
do a frame rate analysis of IL2 sturmovik
that things lags like fuck
INFORISISY 2 years ago
@INFORISISY Not on my PC :)
GUITARPLAYAx93x 1 year ago
@GUITARPLAYAx93x Did i say IL2?
My bad, I Meant Microsoft Flight Simulator X
INFORISISY 1 year ago
@INFORISISY Oh, same thing goes for that haha :)
GUITARPLAYAx93x 1 year ago
@GUITARPLAYAx93x Eh
I doubt it
:0
INFORISISY 1 year ago
@INFORISISY You can doubt all you want, I have an XFX HD 5870 XXX edition. I run it on the highest settings smoothly.
GUITARPLAYAx93x 1 year ago
For FSX
Video cards make less of an effect in fps
The game requires an intense amount of CPU Power to run properly
Even I7's Have not the Capabilities to Run FSX On Full Settings.
Hmm..
I know
I'll buy a Magneto Plasma Turbine Engine :0
INFORISISY 1 year ago
@INFORISISY Youre sadly mistaken then haha. My q6600 rums it just fine on the highest settings. Not kidding
GUITARPLAYAx93x 1 year ago
@GUITARPLAYAx93x Oh well...
Have fun on your q6600 D:
INFORISISY 1 year ago
Can somebody explain to me what's exactly the frame rate stuff?? I don't understand
ThunderBlog 2 years ago
Frames are individual images that make up the video. TV is broadcast at either 25 or 30fps. But most people prefer games running at 60fps because it looks like a smoother video.
I'd imagine they were both v-synced though which is quite good...Given that my PC will get 300fps out of COD4 unbound... so not a huge achievement.
Petchhyy 2 years ago
PC FTW
jeanfulx 2 years ago
the thing that I love about COD is that they optimize their games to 60FPS. Graphics may suffer a little but I think gameplay > graphics.
ZeroG004 2 years ago
OMG! Better buy a 360, the PS3 framrate is FUCKIN* HORRIBLE!!!
MyStuff774 2 years ago
Dont u think you're exaggerating a little bit?they're practically the same moron stfu.
TheDM75 2 years ago
@MyStuff774
If someone thinks the PS3 frame rate is horrible they're insane lol, I've played games at 15 FPS.
Usul573 1 year ago
gt5 havent came out yet so dont raise you hopes that forza 3 is already better
Max160 2 years ago
I get 60fps constant at DX10 COD never really need much hardware power.
PCgame4life 2 years ago
no consoles, get a geforce or radeon hd on pc and that's it, you'll get better fps with better graphics. PC FTW
xxpoonednoobxx 2 years ago
are you a xbox fun or ps3 truly sucks like that??
no offence dude i just gotta know :)
petrosMgr 2 years ago
lol youve never played GT5..shut your mouth.
blazednsleepy 2 years ago
I laugh at people saying that these videos are fake, you're pathetic.
Tennisbegnt 2 years ago
Why can't people just stfu and get along, It seems you're all mad because your e-peen got struck, Oh well deal with it. The 360 is a good console, The ps3 is a good console. If you like one but dislike the other, Then buy the one you like and stfu, If you like both..Then buy both and stfu :). I prefer PC over all though ;), But I own an elite.
boeatsbrains 2 years ago
it's a multiplat, and older one too, older multiplats generally run better on 360.
ninjaseven 2 years ago
how many of you guys actually believe the framerate in this video?
OMGaoyeng 2 years ago
its not about which console has better specs, clearly PS3........but the developers need to understand the tech to get full potential......which is why the 360 version is better.
buckstrickland2 2 years ago
you can't convince me xbox stays a constant 60 Frames per second constantly while ps3 drops 20 to 30 frames when there's not alot going on xbox frame rates only drop like once in this video almost like it was rigged
TheJasonrox 2 years ago
Why would it be rigged?
The 360 simply has a better GPU, it's a multi-platform game so it's not going to be playing on the individual strengths of the console.
They both run at damn low resolutions anyway.
Petchhyy 2 years ago
Domino just got owned agen.........
AASH365 2 years ago
domino you just got owned !!!!!
AASH365 2 years ago
360 flexes its muscle all over the puny ps3 again.
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
And when i say "LAZY" developers its not an excuse, do some research you fuck. Game developers say its different to develop for ps3. Dumbass, get off Bill Gate's Cock.
GeForce47 2 years ago
Stop replying, I don't give a fuck what your EXCUSES are. You can't play an EXCUSE in your console.
Get off your husbands cock.
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
Right you dont give a fuck, you just cant take the truth LOL 360 faggot. Oh and please stop saying what i say kid.
GeForce47 2 years ago
ridiclous, watch at 0:45 the sit guy
Matteus1996 2 years ago
I cant really see what the lower frame rate does. I know a higher frame rate means smoother animations, but i cannot tell the difference, and shouldnt PS3 have faster frame rates? Maybe this might change in Modern Warfare 2.
amitnayna01 2 years ago
Hahaha ps3 can NEVER keep up with the SUPERIOR 360. I know, I have BOTH.
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
Superior?? Everybody knows PS3 has the superio hardware smartass. Compare exclusives not multiplat games. PS3 is different to develop for so of course game developers always have problems.
GeForce47 2 years ago 2
FUCK OFF I'll compare what ever the fuck I want, asshole. The 360 is FAR SUPERIOR.
I don't give a flying fuck about your developer EXCUSES, 360 reigns supreme, period.
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
You again. Its TRUE that game developers get LAZY when it comes to PS3 get your facts right you fucking moron, 360 aint superior COMPARE THE EXCLUSIVE TITLES GRAPHICS.
GeForce47 2 years ago
It's true that retarded fanboys use EXCUSES like lazy developers when their ONLY console is the inferior one.
I compared and 360 won going away and I'll compare the titles I want to play, you fucking fag.
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
Ok compare Oblivion, compare GTA IV, compare Fallout 3, compare Mercenaries 2, compare Half Life 2... ALL those games looks better on PS3. Its not about multiplataform games you fucking dumbass. Some look better on 360 (very few) and some others look beter on ps3, if you were smart you would compare EXCLUSIVES. The Developer of Heavy Rain said it couldnt run on 360 LMFAO shows how shitty it is. most of the developers say ps3 is more powerfull so stop whining noob
GeForce47 2 years ago
ALL those games look and run better on 360, go google Orangebox you stupid fag, it STUTTERS on the ps3 you fucking retard.
IOf course heavy rain can't run on 360 it's a fucking EXCLUSIVE, asswipe.
Alan Wake can't run on ps3. Fucking assclown
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
Jesus you're dumb. THE GAME DEVELOPER said that the 360 CANNOT run the game, it doesnt have enough POWER, there you go, you dont a have a PS3, you're crying like a baby LOL
GeForce47 2 years ago
You're so FUCKING GULLIBLE. Who gives a flying fuck what you alledge a dev said?
We all can see the FACTS that 360 is SUPERIOR, plain as day.
Remedy said ps3 can't run Alan Wake, it doesn't have enough power.
The ps3 only has 256MB system RAM, you fucking drooler. I have TWICE that just on my PC videocard alone, hahaha
DominoEffect66 2 years ago
LMAO Who said ps3 couldnt run Alan wake?? Stop saying bullshit. Uncharted 2 looks better than Alan Wake. PS3 has 512MB XDR RAM you fuckin moron. Its more efficient than 360.
Oh nobody cares about what Game Developers say?? They are the ones who develop the game not you, they know you asshole and they say PS3 is more powerfull so shut the fuck up. PS3 has 7 Cores (SPE) running at 3.2Ghz each, bitch.
GeForce47 2 years ago
GeForce, your the one who brought in the developers so don't try to weasel your way out of it =P
chrisybwell 2 years ago
Im not... Its truth, developers think its harder to develop for the PS3 but when you LEARN how to, its gets much better.
GeForce47 2 years ago 8
@GeForce47 also you have millions and millions of children who buy for the 360. More of a market so more time gets devoted for 360 optimization. All about money....
d3tach3d 1 year ago
@GeForce47 Easier said then done. Games are GPU not CPU intensive, and that's what Sony screwed up when designing the PS3.
RipperLord 1 year ago
@RipperLord I guess that explains why games developed only on the PS3 usually look amazing, and for superior to any 360 game.
DialgaMarine3 1 year ago
@DialgaMarine3 Yes, but they are few and far between because it is difficult to harness the Cell's architecture. What's it to me if they are going to release one game every few years?
On top of that, it's the gameplay not the graphics that make a game good. Sony should focus their exclusives to be fun, not just pretty graphics by making more games like God of War 3 and LBP.
RipperLord 1 year ago
@RipperLord Killzone is good, MAG is excellent, Uncharted 2 is one of the most amazing games ever, Infamous is good, and R&C is awesome. Not sure what youre trying to get at, but PS3 exclusives are great and at the same time have great graphics.
I think youre thinking of the 360. I havnt seen a good 360 exclusive in the last 3 years besides Halo Reach and Fable 2/3. Most 360 exclusives die out within a month because MS puts most emphasis on Mutiplatformers.
DialgaMarine3 1 year ago
@RipperLord Oh, and what do you mean by only one PS3 game coming out every 3 years? Sony already has a lineup of 8 exclusives coming out in 2011. Youve got KZ3, Infamous 2, LBP2, Uncharted 3, Sly 4, Socom 4, Resistance 3, and Twisted Metal. All looking to be excellent games.
When you think about it, PS3 has way more exclusive titles than 360, because while MS focuses mainly on multiplatformers, Sony puts much more emphasis into the exclusives. In short: PS3 has more games.
DialgaMarine3 1 year ago
@DialgaMarine3 As I said before, PS3 needs more fun games. Metacritic doesn't lie, so I'll let them work out the average fun factor of games.
Halo Reach is already about to surpass Uncharted 2 (released about a year before) in sales, so MS can let that speak for itself. Halo 3 sold 8 million (last count), Gears of War 1+2 sold 5 million each, ODST (an expansion more or less) sold 3 million etc.
RipperLord 1 year ago
@DialgaMarine3 In other words, I don't think MS needs to advert their exclusives to sell them. They speak for themselves.
Although you are entitled to your own opinions.
RipperLord 1 year ago
@DialgaMarine3 how many of those exclusives do you plan to play and enjoy more than playing a fun game like Just Cause 2 or Fallout New Vegas?
e102ewan 1 year ago
@RipperLord
Seems to work pretty well for me.
Usul573 1 year ago
@GeForce47 well then develop your own game for the PS3.
Xotigu 7 months ago
7 cell processor to xbox 3 processors , more shaders than xbox, and can produce more pollygons than xbox can ps3 they can handle twice as much as xbox 360 and games can be bigger on ps3 thanks to bluray
TheJasonrox 2 years ago
8 cell processors.
amitnayna01 2 years ago
yeah I meant 8 but only 7 are used my bad
TheJasonrox 2 years ago
well the 8th core is used to spread the load to the 7 SPEs but i multiple platform ported games the 8th core does all the job itself as it acts like a PPC core that the 360 has 3 of hence worse performance, PS3 is more powerfull but who the fuck gives a shit huh?
its the exclusive games that count and there the ps3 wins imo with uncharted 1 and 2 and the gran turismo series.
gfcpettson 2 years ago
You're just one of those kids who copy/paste the console specs from Wikipedia and compare them.
The fact is that multiplatform games often are a bit better on 360. I would care less about the graphics and more about controller and gameplay though.
For me the 360 controller is much more comfortable than dualshock 3.
tigerboyPT 2 years ago
and your the guy with no life who reads these comments looking for what he believes is stupid kids for the record I don't use wikipedia for my console specs multiplatform games run better on the system they are developed for but technically speaking ps3 is a beast compared to 360 the 360 controller is big and wonky while playstation controller barely changed and is very familiar
TheJasonrox 2 years ago
There are speculations that Alan Wake won't come for PC either. Does that make PC too weak to run it?
GameSiphon 2 years ago
cmon ps3 is bether no matter the stupid 2 fps's , lol
marfg12345 2 years ago
Ive capped my pc version to 60fps too. Looks nice
ekstaasikontiainen 2 years ago
how did they do this test with same system on same scene.. cool
slaveknight 2 years ago
awsome lol
greendaywillrock 2 years ago
lol ps3
;c
DrBizarre187 2 years ago
consoles: 1024 x 600 2x AA 45- 60FPS.
a cheap old 9800GT will do 1280 x 1024 (twice the resolution) 4 x AA @ 60FPS easily. a now low priced 4870 can do it @ 1920 x 1200. which is four times the resolution....
projectraven1 2 years ago
well, its a very good for a console
KILLERWSYAN 2 years ago
well its a compromise. its admirable how infinity ward have tried to acheive 60 frames a second, but unfortunate the resolution has been hacked down. 360 scales it better, but really its not much of a consolation
projectraven1 2 years ago
nice to meet you..
finally i meet people who know what is native resolution! some people hated me becuz i say that and hard for them to beliv consoles only 600p 60fps..
raydenPGD111 2 years ago
and the winner is the pc with over 90 fps
Krisisb0b 2 years ago
maybe xbox 360 reduce some setting...
raydenPGD111 2 years ago
xbox can't, its the developers
TheEditingJesus 2 years ago
yea thum up for that!..
yea dont 100% blame the system..
raydenPGD111 2 years ago
I liked the PS3, but I just don't understand what your paying for when you buy it. It's far far inferior to the 360. Even if it has better hardware, it's frame rates are far lower than the Xbox's and it's visuals are darker and have more pop out textures and glitches. I don't understand why anyone would buy that huge and expensive system. Btw, I'm not a fanboy, I don't own a ps3 or a 360. I'm a PC gamer, which I think is better than ps3 and xbox.
Yardwastetheband 2 years ago
ur payng for free internet lol
DamianRproductions 2 years ago
that statement is 100% correct !
manabog 2 years ago
you are paying for technologies sony want to push into other markets and used the ps3 as a springboard. for example i think we all know that this generation 360 has done just fine with dvd.....shock horror if games needed two discs then they got them and so is the case with pc games far advanced of the consoles!!!! bluray will be needed probably next generation, but it seems pretty clear to me its mostly unused inside ps3 but for sony's personal battle to win against HD DVD.
projectraven1 2 years ago
Yeah that's totally true, the ps3 has really nice components inside, buts it's clearly not being put to any good use, and it's just annoying that they keep trying to push there own new technologies on people.
Yardwastetheband 2 years ago
some sort of next gen format will be needed for the next gen consoles. im sure of it, you could go on and on with multiple discs, but in the end dvd wont have a good enough read speed and you will be swapping too often. bluray for THIS gen, ps3, was just too soon, too early. if the console has just a 2x drive. a 4x drive, it would be considerably faster than 360's dvd drive on average! maybe ps4 will have a 8x BD drive, and THEN sony will have made a good choice. ps3 though, too early IMO...
projectraven1 2 years ago
yeah 360 does sustain its framerate better clearly, both games are very similar visually its a tie if it werent for this video pointing to how the 360 version runs smoother and faster when the going gets tough. disappointing how they only run 600P on console. but then again, thats where the pc version comes in.....
projectraven1 2 years ago
better visuals on ps3
nocodenull 2 years ago
human eye only see something like 30 frames per second
DamianRproductions 2 years ago
do some researche before saying shit like this
TomoShynaz 2 years ago
but i really can't see some large difference between ps3 and xbox version. I am not ps3 fanboy I got 360
DamianRproductions 2 years ago
if you cant seedifference between these two it doesnt mean your eye can only see .30 frames
TomoShynaz 2 years ago
i heard that somewhere at tv that human eye can see 30 frames per second
DamianRproductions 2 years ago
well it can see more than that lol. its not hard to discern up to 70 frames per second. some claim they can tell apart 100 or 120 but personally i cannot, i can however easily see the difference up to 70 or 80 frames. generally 60 is enough and thats what fast moving games should aim for
projectraven1 2 years ago
human eye can easily see 60 frames per second, and more. the difference between a 60FPS game and a 30FPS game is instantly noticeable, especially if you are playing it because it feels faster, the control response feels much slicker and the camera changes direction much more smoothly etc
projectraven1 2 years ago
lol, thats not true
Yardwastetheband 2 years ago
At least this game has a better frame rate then CoD WaW... >.>
messameesa 2 years ago
the most important thing i think about frame rate is: 1 it's above 30 rather 45 (quite smooth)
2 it got to be stable specially pc,
because if the frame rate is unstable the mouse will change speed all the time and that is very annoying like in fps games.
you know how it is if you do have a low end card like me. (Ati mobility radeon hd 2600 pro(imac))
filleman17 2 years ago
if it is higher, is it badder or better???? i do not get it
SpeedUpMaster 2 years ago
Higher the frame rates the smoother the animations.
SgtThom 2 years ago
WOOOW 60 FRAME RATE!
mn i thought its was onlyon 30 fps
dam im ok with these graphics if they are running on 60 fps
my HD 2600 PRO video card runs cod4 on mx settings no AA max reslotuin and i get only 35 as a max fps :P
KILLERWSYAN 2 years ago
once you get much higher than 40fps you are just watching the same frames repeated a lot anyway.
thats why id capped doom3 at 30. and thats fine.
over 30 is perfectly smoth gameplay, especially on PC.
and cod4 isnt very demanding anyway.
its just a souped up version of the COD2 engine, and that wasnt demanding when it first came out either.
i suppose it shows that infinity ward know their onions when it comes to coding on PC
w0bbl3r 2 years ago
i playd Cod4 then a different game with only 30fps and it look so choppy
GamingBlitzDOTcom 2 years ago
ps3 has surprisingly more effects, better shadows, and smoother edges, considering its a port from the xbox version
GamingBlitzDOTcom 2 years ago
YES
KILLERWSYAN 2 years ago
retard fanboy go die
manabog 2 years ago
what did i say that was fanboy related? i just said after playing a 60fps, 30fps looks very choppy
GamingBlitzDOTcom 2 years ago
did I reply to you by mistake ? I wanted to reply to nocodenull for saying "better visuals on ps3"
manabog 2 years ago
yeah
GamingBlitzDOTcom 2 years ago
this runs on 600p
slaveknight 2 years ago
Xbox upscales its 720p picture to 1080p. There is no native 1080p setting and no halving of the frame rate.
DigitalFoundry 3 years ago
yep
GamingBlitzDOTcom 2 years ago
well i'd only expect the framerate to drop , especially if it's played native 1080p . but it's not cause i've heard when the xbox upscales cod4 to 1080p the framerate halves...
beeje1309 3 years ago
Yes, the PS3 version has a number of minor special effects toned down on 360, and also better shadows. Overall performance speaks for itself though.
DigitalFoundry 3 years ago
look at 0:23 the ps3 has way more rain the 360 which has little compared to the ps3. :)
More Rain: Better
CHUMAATUNZU 3 years ago
however, the ps3 suffers from frequent framerate drops compaired to the 360 and minor details such as rain are hardly noticeable
ninjaseven 3 years ago
?????? u are stupid
RnBciO 2 years ago
yes because the ps3 and 360 came out in 2006 and 2005. I wouldnt expect a 250 pound pc bought in 2005 to run this game like the 360 can or ps3 can when they cost about 250 pounds-300 pounds
redgrayz 3 years ago
dude your videos deserve a lot more views and ratings then this. 5/5 man
Coolbri1191 3 years ago
You are all wrong. PC version of this MULTIPLATFORM game looks and runs the best.
Glotttis 3 years ago 2
I've noticed the multiplatform games always look worse yet the ps3 exclusives always look better lol
FoxhoundJay 3 years ago
The Xbox 360 is always one step ahead of the PS3..
This video just proves that even further.
Enkei1989 3 years ago
Really? I don't want to bring up Killzone 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, or Uncharted: Drake's Fortune....
But....
KILLZONE 2, METAL GEAR SOLID 4, AND UNCHARTED: DRAKE'S FORTUNE.
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
... And do you have any idea of what microsoft has in store for 2009...?
Nope.
Enkei1989 3 years ago
Nope.
Was that a shot at yourself?
Because they don't have anything.
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
... And how do you know that...?
Oh! I know!! .. You've got a time machine, haven't you??!
Lucky bastard! lol
Enkei1989 3 years ago
Well, my penis can actually travel through time, so he told me.
Last week he went back to 1944 and fucked Anne Frank, but before he came home he went to December 2009, and went on a gaming site to look up the Xbox360 GOTY, and there wasn't many good games there.
Or so he says, he could have just been disoriented from fucking Anne Frank.
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago 3
CpNickel 3 years ago
16.
On paper, the Ps3 is better.
The rest is subjective.
/conversation
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
Seriously you stooped to the level of 4chan?
Mmkay, the thing is no matter what you bring up the Xbox won a long time ago. As much as i hate the Xbox it wins as much as i hate the PS3 is Loses.
And for the record i use my computer to game.
CpNickel 3 years ago
I believe I said.
/conversation
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
Meh, i don't understand this nerd lingo and thank god i don't intend on doing so. Good day kid. I SAID GOOD DAY.
^
Enough?
CpNickel 3 years ago
No.
It needs to end with /conversation.
/conversation
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
The way you end a conversation is bye saying good bye. or end of discussion not some nerd lingo like "/conversation".
CpNickel 3 years ago
/CONVERSATION
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
Your a nerd. Now prove me wrong.
CpNickel 3 years ago
I never said that I wasn't, broseph.
/conversation
NakedBrunch93 3 years ago
You're a faggot that licks his dad's dick once per day, while in unison fisting his anus.
o0Lelouch0o 2 years ago
Prove me wrong.
o0Lelouch0o 2 years ago
At least you know how to spell.
Good job kid, at least you're getting there.
CpNickel 2 years ago
Also, good job trying to troll me is an obvious fail.
JUST CAUSE:
1. im not obsessed with trolling people
2. don't make anime music videos about retarded waponese shows.
3. R Fatty.
CpNickel 2 years ago