BBC-What on Earth Is Wrong with Gravity BL 05 Son

[kkstephany]

ok... what if thinking out of the box is actually thinking in the spiritual realm? energy missing in the EXTRA DIMENSION... why this extra dimension couldn't be the spiritual realm?

[slybuster]

no way, he looks like an autistic Cillian Murphy (i.e. Scarcrow)

[damrak1969]

I saw an earlier comment that said this guy looks like a 40 year old Justin Beiber - now that's all I can see when I look at him - hilarious!!

[mohiahmed1]

why is this guy always smiling or seems to be laughing?

WHAT U LAUGHIN BOUT MOTHAFUKA!!! :P

[Hermann2711]

the particle accelerator works by "bashing stuff together and see what comes out" - that's how I cook.

[suddenrushsarge]

That's it.... I'm dividing by zero. OHH SHIIII....

[Daymjo]

energy will 'appear to disappear' thumbs up for geeky joke haha :D

[coltoncasey15]

three dementions, up down, north south, east west, 4th demention, in & out, :) however only god works that demention, so friends gravity is surely the work of god

[86nabatat]

@coltoncasey15 God / Allah / Lord :)

[nost78]

@coltoncasey15 4th dimension is better associated with time, "in/out" is simply "zoom" on one of the the three X,Y,Z axes. Not saying god doesn't exist just that your theory doesn't match observations.

[coltoncasey15]

@nost78 I mean in & out as in & out of earths realm into the demention of heaven where God is, heaven does not have a galactic or universal adress, so in my opinion heaven must exist in another demention. by the way, after comparing the prophecy of the bible with what is going on today in history, I know god exists, some scientist need to actually read the bible before they say its not true, and that god doesnt exist :)

[SongOfTrueLovers]

THE GREATEST GRAVITY IS THE GRAVITY OF MIND!

[DaMoTaiShi]

Hey, it's Chicago :-)

[nick62040]

Puff.

[nick62040]

He's high on something and he needs a hair cut.

[shinystarlet]

@nick62040 He's high on science of course ;-) I wish I was so enthusiastic about my work.

[msms47]

@nick62040 you re high on idoicy

[nick62040]

@msms47 I don't recall asking you your opinion, by the way, learn to spell before you post.

[msms47]

@nick62040 sciencs gives me right to answer on dumies >;p

[plasticspastic201]

fuckin annoying mancunian twatt

[ImTellingOnYoo]

@plasticspastic201 He is from liverpool you pleb

[plasticspastic201]

@ImTellingOnYoo calm down calm down. so he is a mick immigrant. pfffft

[ImTellingOnYoo]

@plasticspastic201 Did I say Liverpool? He's actually Dundonian...

[Tait011]

@imtheuser12345

Dont be a negaton :D

[RhydianTJ]

It wasnt an Albert Einstein "FAIL" - he just did not know

[TheDrakaan]

@RhydianTJ It was a bit =/ If you propose a theory of "gravity" implying how gravity works everywhere, it cant dismiss certain areas, so it was kind of his goal to find out.

[TheDrakaan]

I want to be that "Newton that appears on the scene" Q_Q

[Daymjo]

@RhydianTJ

Well.. he tried.. and didn't succeed.. I guess that means he failed :) not to poke at the greatest mind of all times, it's merely semantics.

[binary3i]

@RhydianTJ yeah and ALBERT EINSTEIN never belived on quantum mechanics.

[toniroxxxxx]

8:18 of toni and brian cox...

[masluxx]

I am a complete novice but it seems to me that we are in a universe that rebounded from collapsed dimensions, or if you will rebounded from the dimensions being turned on edge on a point. Think of a something that gets sucked into a black hole as being rotated in space time out of our dimensions. It is still there just the dimensions are turned 90deg off our reference point in all directions and in a point in time..

[nost78]

@masluxx how can you possibly infer that this universe is somehow rebounded from collapsed dimensions at 90 degrees?? firstly it really makes no sense, secondly you may as well say the our universe was actually born from lime flavored jello/jelly where galaxies are sprinkles and black holes are bubbles... Do a maths degree, then physics degree, study the history of cosmology then make real hypotheses. let's not pretend to know better than those who have devoted their lives to understand

[masluxx]

@nost78 nice long winded rant there. But you really might want to look at what space-time is. You really might want look at what a black hole is. You really might want to; i will quote you, " Do a maths degree, then physics degree, study the history of cosmology" then you will not have to be a troll and you can make a real critique of a working idea/thought someone else has on this topic. Lets not pretend you have any of these things other then devoted yourself to trolling. (yes, i mock you)

[nost78]

@masluxx Nice, I enjoyed reading your observational based evidence for your theory, you backed up your claim brilliantly... (yes, I mock you also). Don't insult those who dedicate their lives to science by spouting bs theories then not expect anyone to question you. Any accepted theory is published for peer review then re-tested for it's integrity. I'm waiting for yours. So what is you point exactly? I disagree with you and that's trolling? If anything, your initial post is trolling.

[masluxx]

@nost78 Yes, do read a peer review or try writing one for that matter, you will find a peer review devoid of ad hominem and your reply full of it. OR Are you saying you are an adult professional scientist that writes papers for peer review? Please, do tell... I would like to read your work on this subject. Because, if you did not get my first post then...well, I bet your paper(s) will be a new look on the subject that none have logically examined before, maybe not even you.

[nost78]

@masluxx Not once have you tried to defend, explain or prove your "theory"and you attack me for not being a professional scientist? lol. You pretend so obviously to know where our universe comes from, the funnest thing is you seem to believe your own bs. What you speak of is beyond the knowledge of our scientists.

[nost78]

@masluxx continued from below) M-Theory - 11 dimensional branes, thermodynamics - the heat death of the universe and your theory - nothing more than a thought experiment (minus the back hole, dimensional rebounds and other crap) well known to scientists as way to explain how difficult it is for us to imagine other dimensions. I bow to your obvious superior understanding of the universe... If you don't like people poking holes in half baked musings don't post them on public forums!

[masluxx]

@nost78 Original post,” I am a complete novice but it seems to me that we are in a universe that rebounded from collapsed dimensions, or if you will rebounded from the dimensions being turned on edge on a point. Think of a something that gets sucked into a black hole as being rotated in space time out of our dimensions. It is still there just the dimensions are turned 90deg off our reference point in all directions and in a point in time.”, due tell where is your critque of that idea?

[masluxx]

@nost78 due show your critque of that idea in your numrous past replies or claim your troll title ah?

[nost78]

@masluxx aich,tee,tee,pee://vvvvvv.yout­ube.com/watch?v=fVXV8XB-GPo try to be a little more original next time.

My critique is simple. General relativity breaks down when trying to calculate the properties of a singularity; such as in a black hole or the point source of the big bang. yet you claim your unoriginal thought experiment to be the answer... your turn troll!

[masluxx]

@nost78 Very good, 4 post in and you actually make a real critique, and not one before as demonstrated by you inability to produce one illustrates. You do know how science works right?  You do know scientist do not think they have the absolute answer to anything (that is the realm of religion and/or fools). Scientist try to find concepts that can be tools to best explain and understand what we observe and answer the question we have. Do you have a better tool the relativity for macro scale?

[nost78]

@masluxx erm, still waiting for some validation of your original post, Is it that you actually have nothing to backup your quasi-scientific mental diarrhea? So you'd rather divert attention away from your inability to posit ANY substantial refutation. I guessed as much.

And just for the record string theory (though physically unprovable) can mathematically unify the quantum and macro universes. see Ed Witten and M-Theory as mentioned earlier.

[nost78]

@masluxx Your "theory" actually failed in my first post, but you somehow seem not to have noticed... Even more so when you claimed your "theory" to be "working". Just accept your "theory" is just a well known thought experiment, you're making yourself look silly now.

[masluxx]

@nost78 ok you failed the turing test....goodbye troll bot....

[nost78]

@masluxx Still waiting...

[bison700]

brian's no dweeb, he's a nerd.

[Xeidasx]

who the still hell says "dweebs" lol

[shax122]

babe. (full stop)

[Nmethyltransferase]

Whoa! He has grey hair?

[RyanVlogging]

@Nmethyltransferase he is 40 years old

[PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD]

@RyanVlogging This narrator looks like a 22 year old. It's quite uncanny.

[RyanVlogging]

@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD He is not a narrator. Please watch the series and then make judgment. He is actually a particle physicist. His name is Brian Cox.

[PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD]

@RyanVlogging Yes, but he's acting as the narrator in this series.

[RyanVlogging]

@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD Yes true, but he is also speaking from a professional point of view, for example he says things like "when i started" and such.

[richardsucksx]

@RyanVlogging Both of you dweebs are correct.

[RyanVlogging]

@richardsucksx I havnt heard the word dweebs in about 5 years! haha

[cutie92faraah]

oh i <3 this . . . BBC Horizon rocks

[BoDiggety]

pretty cool, makes me want to try and figure stuff out :)

[EagleTalon1970]

Gravity is fine.You worry to much.

[bsurep]

Do we get to hear about those eyes of yours O_O

[gingerany]

I loved it!!