Added: 2 years ago
From: BereanBeacon
Views: 8,714
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • tegnap faragtam őket,

  • Of course, evolution is bunk. But why assume the Ica stones support biblical creationism? But why assume the hominid figures are human, or that they were made by humans? Why assume the Bible is about human history? For that matter, if God exists, why assume Yahweh is God? How much crap history does it take?

  • ICA STONES were part of PRE-DILUVIAN (pre-12 000 BC) ERA; located in Library of general education of flora and fauna. The theory of Creationism and Darwinism are both wrong; Darwinism is a substitute of Creationism; as occult "reserve" if story of Bible (sumerian NON human artificially crossbreeding story) fails; then goes INPUT Darwinism and Interventionism; which also "wants to find 1. Adam (sumerian half human, half non human ADAPA)". Mission is to CONTROL the past - not showing the truth

  • your a monkey what you must believe if you have faith in evoultion itssimple go ahead scracth your ass if your a monkey

  • I think the Ica stones are to CS what the Piltdown Man was to Darwinism. And it's a shame because there is so much else based on real science that is far more compelling as an argument.

  • how can christans claim mankind is only a few thousand years old , and that god put dinosaurs fossils here to test our faith... and in the same breath try and claim these stones as creationism proof.....oh thats right , because its a matter of faith not fact...i lol @ you

  • @Fackifiknow christians do not believe in "Creationism" only in a creator. its as ignorant as saying muslims are suicide bombers so fuck all mulsims. by your assumption i then can assume everyone else in your family is a bunch of ass licking numb nut fuck tards who like to make asinine comment with the pretense of moderate intelligence how bout you just shut the fuck up and let the big people talk k

  • @entity623 How can a true Bible believing Christian not belive in creationism when Genesis clearly spelss it out and the only alternative, evolution, is totally and utterly absurd.

  • @tiarnan76 if you really want a lesson ill teach it but if you just want to make a point then ill let it be. sound fair.

  • @entity623 Any lesson I need I'll get from the Bible as its infallible, unless of course your word is more infallible than Gods - if you really think thats the case, how then do you profess to be a Christian? By the way how old do you think the earth is?

  • god and dinosaurs do not mix , you bible people are sure grasping at straws here....

  • @Fackifiknow ignorance at its finest lmao "god and dinosaurs do not mix" thats the most stupidest remark on youtube yet. thank you for your entertainment.

  • xD some of the stones are fake... but not all of them...

  • @mastalp01 How do know which are the fake ones?

  • @BereanBeacon1 well first the stones with dinos are eventually fake... and the stones with the nazca line animals too... I am from peru... i know the people.. i know myself LOL and i must say that they are good at fooling tourists but sometimes their imaginations goes too far... xD dinos and humans ? i know there was a group of people making this stones because they wanted to sell them to tourists and they copied pictures from books.... but REMEMBER there are real ones ...

  • @mastalp01 Well. people always make copies to sell, but were you there when the dinos were found?

  • @mastalp01 Creation Evidence from South America

    w w wdotyoutubedotcom/watch?v=eJsA­n2jSxxo

  • What does this have to do with BS religion? Why is this guy talking about dinosaurs and the "lord"? Huh? Are these people in a sort of trance - dementia? I guess their "god" directs science? WTF!? Watching this is like being in a seclusion room in an insane asylum....on thorazine.

  • @t4705mb6 ....and you could certainly use some Thorazine ...so you are in the right place. And if you ask them mad scientists carrying those giant butterfly nets nicely, they will also give you some Ritalin, basket-weaving materials & some really sharp scissors you can run down the hall with.

  • @sparky6025 which is why america no longer is free thank you for letting it out. In other words If you are different we can fix it by drugging you or if you want to be an ass about it we can just label you a terrorist lock you in a rabbit cage in Gitmo and call it a day.

  • @entity623 Part 1 of 2: ...which, as per their own publically stated goals, is precisely what the globalist elite commie atheist secular humanist evo NWO social engineers and their jack-booted thug minions would like to do to all Christian Creationists & fundamentalists ...that and bring back social Darwinism Hitler-like eugenics and eliminate us all as 'unfit to survive.’ ….

  • @entity623 Part 2 of 2: There has never been a stronger champion of American freedoms then Christian Creationists: “We hold these TRUTHS to be SELF-EVIDENT, that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, that they are ENDOWED by their CREATOR with certain UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.“ (Preamble to the U.S. Declaration of Independence, 4, July, 1776. Emphasis mine). Do you have even a remote clue what ‘unalienable’ means?

  • Comment removed

  • @sparky6025 that constitution aint shit these days they invade our natural rights all the time

  • @jac5562, I agree.

  • There were Ica Stones of archaeological merit that do date to Pre-Hispanic Peru.

    But the ones with dinos and sophisticated surgery techniques on them have been proven to be hoaxes.

    Sorry folks.

    Try again.

  • Debunked. Ica Stones were a hoax.

    Try againl

  • @Retrieverman1 Nein. They exist. They are that old.

  • @Theowest Nope.

    It's a hoax.

    The peasant guy who put them together fooled a physician in Peru. In a court of law, the contriver admitted they were contrived.

  • @Theowest yep. they have been proven hoaxes. by 3 methods of dating the carving lines, and other ways. not true. sorry. come on, man, keep up with the times

  • great presenter. reading from a powerpoint is hard.

  • If some of these Ica stones are real. I wonder what the nazca monkey saw?

  • Hey i was waving my hand! Y didn't u call on me...

    Its because i'm jewish isn't it?

  • Awh? rrruuu? They called Ica Stones, Awh? ahhh?

    The lady that works ahh? She works at ahh! the Ahhh! Place there...

    Its been said that only childrens toys have... Ahhh? All these wheels and stuff!

    Haaa Ha Haaa! Im So Sorry but you have just bored me to tears, to awh? TEARS!

    No hard fell'ns but just not that exciting, listening to you... Just frecken dreadful ... Next time practice before you go... Thank you!

    And by the way r u Christan? U made that pretty clear that u were... Peace!

  • To those who wish to deny creation, you would rather hear men's "fairy tales" and fantasies of dinosaurs and outrageous and even ridiculous dating methods. To believe such things is religion, not science. True science recognizes how complex life is and does not try to dodge inconvenient truths.

    For those who choose to base their eternal future on slanders of true archeological evidence; I challenge you to visit Ica, Peru. Evidence is all over the place and is still being uncovered!

  • @roilshe If it were legitimate, I'd be reading about those "amazing" discoveries in the Archeological journals.

    Get it through your head, those "inca stones" have been shown to be a hoax for the tourists and the other indigenous artwork is nothing more than artistic embellishments of ancient mythology.

  • @jknengr796 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.

  • @BereanBeacon1 I looked up that "Life Science Prize". It is a joke. Number 5 on the list would be a problem for you. "Evidence must be scientific, that is, objective, valid, reliable and calibrated".

    Any valid scientific study would pass peer review. Creationists have NO science to back them up and don't follow the scientific peer review process. So, my statement stands.

    BTW: Look up the Dover Trial. The evidence and lack-thereof has already been settled in court.

    Get an education.

  • @jknengr796 it takes faith to beleive your a monkey palsm 91

  • @jonnyralphcook Get an education! You sound like an ignorant retard

    !

  • @jknengr796 i gotta 8th grade eduateumm

  • The ones depicting dinosaurs and modern techniques were fake they lacked resin built up on other stones and had modern paint applications. Archeoraptor was not a 'evolutionist fraud' it was done by chinese peasents to get out of poverty,

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • sounds like dr.zoidburg from fururama!

  • moors mobilize

  • @callingheyzeus You have listed three Cretinists frauds, of two types.  The first two are frauds that pretend the abnormal (and which fooled no scientists who actually examined the specimens) as the typical, and the third is a Cretinist fraud which pretends things that are false and known to be false about experiments.

  • @callingheyzeus So you admit that your claim of an Archaeoraptor-lookalike on an Ica stone is just another Cretinist fraud.

  • @callingheyzeus Do you ACTUALLY have a picture of such a stone, or is that just another fabrication on your part?

  • if you what to see more than 1000 ICA pictures !!! -check this video, here 3 parts /watch?v=Tnu6SKRsdfo

  • @callingheyzeus Yes, the way you Cretinists fabricate things IS rather grand.

  • @evensgrey Another projection from this skeptard. Got proof? No.

  • @callingheyzeus So you've got undocumentable purported burial clothing that shows every sign of being fake as well as undocumentable purported burial stones that are already known to be fake.

  • @callingheyzeus The fellow who made one for the BBC in 1977 said he did it by baking the stone in cow dung. He did the carving with a dental drill. Of course, the man who actually SOLD all the stones with interesting images (none of which can be documented as having come from tombs at all) was a dentist, so we know the sources had access to modern tools suitable for the job.

  • fake, gay ... fake and gay

  • thx for video

    more ica stones here

    /watch?v=jSBAeAyo_T4

  • Wow, the naysayers are strangely silent on this vid!

  • LOL Look at the Tools scared of Christ...

  • @ChurchOfKali66619

    Maybe the rocks you've seen are fake, but all 15,000? That's a lot of fakery .. and for what purpose? What tools did those poor Peruvians use to make 15 cents per hour faking rocks?

    Even if many stones were faked, all it takes is a single bonified stone out of thousands to prove their depictions were very real.

  • @SounzNice As you would know if you bothered to research what is known of these stones, the only positively known tool used was a dental drill (such as the dentist who sold all the interestingly marked stones would have had).

    The out of place images have been determined to have traces of modern paints and abrasives, which means those stones are of no help for a supporting claims about anything ancient.

  • @evensgrey Nice projection. Research? So your dental excuse is what you've read? Let's face it, we both have mere hearsay to go on. But you take a position with your fakery charge, I don't, All I've said was if some are fake, fine. You need to read better and project less. It doesn't matter if 99% of all the millions of oopart is "fake" because the odds of 100% fakes is 0. There's simply too much. Also, some are impossible to fake. So as long as 1% is real, I rest my case.

  • @SounzNice No stones documented as coming from graves contain any out of place images. ALL stones containing out of place images come from a confessed manufacturer of fakes. None of the stones are impossible to fake. Your Cretinist attempt to shift the burden of proof fails again.

  • @evensgrey Again, I've not argued one way or the other. I personally have no opinion without indepth investigating myself, which likely never happen. My advice is you shouldn't form opinions either. Your weak "not impossible to fake" proves nothing. Fail.

  • @SounzNice In what way does completely debunking your claims not work?

  • @evensgrey By saying something can be faked doesn't maike it fake. Damn you are slow.

  • @SounzNice Why are you projecting your failings onto those who point out that you don't have any evidence and WHY you don't have any evidence?

  • @evensgrey You are the projectionist here, but now a lying projectionist! You just weakened your view and strengthened ours. Fine job. Glad to have you debate this!

  • @SounzNice You LIKE being demonstrated to be a fraud?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more