Added: 3 years ago
From: roguegovt
Views: 11,704
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No comments in 3 yrs? God help us...

  • There were planes. There were explosives.3000 people were killed. The Commission LIED, NORAD LIED, The Bush Administration LIED.

    A NEW INVESTIGATION IS NEEDED

  • I'm a master metallurgist and I KNOW how metals behave under stress. NO planes hit anywhere on 9-11. Why send up f16's when they know the planes are lies. I saw a list of the people and job descriptions of the 7 tapes of 2nd plane and ALL "eye" witnesses.They are all video pros currently working for the big 5 msm conglomerates. The msm showed 3 different flight paths for 2nd "plane." Trust me people.  That "plane" could not go through the steel reinforced concrete floors to come out unscathed

  • It would be very easy to confirm too the second when the explosion took place . The seismic shock waves would have been recorded which would be precisely timed my Atomic clocks .

  • The only object that could strike the pentagonwould be transmitting a friend or foe = friend signal.

  • @Ewfire

    Wow I'm surprised you weren't severely hurt by those 400-500 mph winds coming from the engines. You do realize the engines have to blow out as fast as the plane is going, right? So, did everything around you just get kinda fucked up? Cuz it seems like that plane was silent and soft, not even harming the gwass outside the pentagon.

  • Everyone knows this was a total sham! Follow the money, that's ALL the proof I need.

    If you have no clue, do the research....it's scary but true. Time for American's to wake the hell up!

  • 05281987 Mathias Rust lands in Red Square. Next day C-span and ABC run animation, on how that could not happen at the pentagon, due to triangular ,anti aircraft hidden under landscaping, would take out approaching aircraft.1997? 1998? April?(rain) State theater Easton, Pa-cocktail party, Ollie North says ,"There are stingers on the observation deck of the WTC, that would take out an aircraft that approached,similar to the units at the pentagon."

  • 05281987 Mathius Rust lands in Red Square. Next day C-span and ABC run animation, on how that could not happen at the pentagon, due to triangular ,anti aircraft hidden under landscaping, would take out approaching aircraft.

  • Don't forget about the "witness" that said he was inside the building where near where the plane struck, he had reported that he had a red liquid all over his glasses and thought it was blood, only later he said he was told it was fuel dye, only problem is, commercial airline fuel has been dyed blue since the early 90s. Wonder what kind of plane that was. If it was a plane at all.

  • Its a GOV Clock does the Gov ever do anything right or ( On Time!) a nut! What American solder or officer would allow such a thing to take place anyway! I do not bye it,This because of intentional bad intelligence, that I could not rule out.

  • Google "9/11 and October Surprise scandal"

  • LOL so the guy whose job it was to set the clocks was 5 minutes out.....most folks watches are set wrong by a few minutes. This lady is a nutcase.

    All the witnesses report only one explosion and it was when they witnessed the plane hitting the building! As for the bomb sniffing dogs.......they probably do this every now and then....its a huge building so its not at all surprising they happened to be doing at one particular entrance on 911.

  • kitbots,

    are you a complete idiot? you still think the jetliner hit the pentagon? what a complete moronic dumbass. anyone in their right mind knows it was a missile. give me one reason to think a jetliner hit the pentagon?

  • Thanks for this.

  • even though we know that everything is an inside job..we still cant do anything about it..so when the day come when we al have to fight the government...i will have my own retaliation crew..will you??..i say go buy all the guns u can and wait till that dayy..if u have kids..dont tell em untill they're old enough to ecxept the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!

  • i was there in the parking lot when that airplane flew just feet over my car, and instantly crashed into the pentagon.you are a grabastic piece of amphibious shit. get a fucking life.

  • Silencing the auditors looking for the 2.3 trillion dollars.

  • Gone are the days when I sit goggle-eyed watching the latest video 'proving' 9/11 was an inside job. Almost every one of the core truths espoused by the TM have turned out to have simpler explanations, the exception being WTC7, which I believe is nothing less than the perps showing their asses. My message to the TM is simple: Put up or shut up. The obstacles aren't insurmountable, you just aren't trying hard enough. No amount of celebrity endorsement will save a sinkink ship. Get bailing!

  • so why was their molten metal in the wtcs basements 60 days after 9/11? maybe you can clear that up for me, and while you are at it, do cell phones work at 5K or 40K on a jet? havent worked for me in and ive tried it over 50xs

  • Trotting out talking points you got from the internet is not going to convince anyone. While I agree the molten metal was a significant clue that explosives were indeed used to demolish the towers, and that cell phones only worked on aircraft after the technology was installed in the planes (years after 9/11) I am not one to just accept everything on the net as true and accurate. This Honegger woman bases her whole argument on stopped clocks. Also, she's ugly and extremely annoying.

  • what an idiot, what is your point. where are the 85 pentagon cams? did the boxcutters really regurgitate red bandanas and passports thru conflagrations? babs olsons faked phone calls? ... willie brown told not to fly on 9/11 ... get a life shill ... guys like you annoy me and have ugly hearts ... wtf diff does it make if honneger is the medusa ... do you want me email and you and we can compare "looks", cuz im sure you would lose and wtf point would that make? get a life and stick to the topic.

  • So basically just said. W"hile I agree you have substantial evidence against the official story...I still will not accept it as real evidence"

  • @buhgoil In a precise military office, clocks are accurrate. You miss the point because you don't want to accept the truth.

    This "the government",,, is nothing but a gang of criminals in certain positions and the obstruction of justice is what can place those guilty behind bars or executed as they should.

    I wouldn't doubt if this goes on for many more years uninvestigated as a lawful investigation would take it, you will hear of one after the other perp dying for various reasons.

  • dogs - the prez was expected to land there, so the dogs would be standard procedure.

    google: Isaac Jesse Waipulani Ho'opi'i

    i dont think the plane hit the building on 911, but whatever explosives were used outside the building, Waipulani's dog didnt detect them. he and his dog were alleged to have just finished sniffing out the helipad area minutes before the plane flew over.

  • Ron Paul can still be president!

    google dvds4delegates

    google campaign for liberty

  • What is your Name, Position, and Company?

    Can you describe how much detail you saw on that day?

    Do you know why they have not released any pictures of the plane when the building is covered by video cameras?

  • rt 50? really? wat part? ther is only 1 spot on 50 with any view of the pentagon, name it.

    if in a car, forget about it. only on foot can u see the pentagon frm anywhere ON rt50 enuf 2 hav seen the "impact". even from there, u would hav a pretty hard time actually seeing the impact.

    maybe if u lived in one of the apartments near or on rt50 u could catch a peek, but you'd still b pretty far away frm the explosion outside the pentagon.

    i think you are lying about seeing it.

  • Bomb sniffing dogs were there twice a week starting a year prior to 9/11. This woman is lying. It's has been protocol starting late 1999. They had received intel of cars trying to park with bombs. By August of 2001, DOD had already install anti-car bomb shields. Not to mention that dog sniffing teams have been at the pentagon for years doing ocassional testing.

  • @cymbaline90210 " It's has been protocol starting late 1999"

    Yeah protocol, for decades it worked fine protecting America then they suddenly changed it three months before their attack, to place the SOD in the loop of chain of command regarding hijacked aircraft. That morning he decided not to make himself available to an emergecy. He should be the first to be executed in full public view for his role.

  • @SlackerSlayer For the record, the very first thing that I ever read about the events of that day being a false flag event, in 2005 or 2006, was an analysis of the "pod" below the plane that hit the second tower. While studying those pictures and the various videos that were broadcast on that day, I noticed a few different instances of poorly edited visual effects and overlays. Shortly after that, I realized that topic was off limits in the movement, so I tried to convince myself to ignore it.

  • @RandleEl11 Now, it seems like the majority of those in the movement are talking about this openly. What was once a topic that was looked down upon has now become a very important topic that people can no longer ignore because it is clear that much of the video footage of the planes from that day contain clear evidence of manipulated and edited video.

  • Buhgoil, "It's this type of bollocks reasoning that made me leave the 9/11TM."

    Then it is quite likely that the work of agents of dis-info have been successful against you. Personally, there is very little info here of proveability. I still know the official story is absolute lies though!

  • Really? Why?

  • That's too bad because there is evidence and there are facts that prove that 9/11 was an inside job.

    Obviously, not every single thing that everyone says about 9/11 is true. Not every single person who comes forward with information is telling the truth, but this holds true for any matter.

    Have you heard of dis-information agents?

    The truth movement is a movement made up of people who are trying to figure out what happened on that day. Why did you decide to not be a part of it?

  • Simple. One by one, like dominoes, the 'core truths' that convinced me of I.J. have fallen. There are much simpler explanations for each of them and I consider myself an adherent to Sir Wm of Occam's principle. I admit that there was likely government involvement in the planning and execution phases of 9/11, but not on the scale the TM believes. WTC was not CD. Pentagon hit by THE plane. NORAD NOT stood down. 'Pull it' means 'get the firefighters out and give up on the building.'

  • That's too bad because the evidence does not lie. The laws of physics and the laws of resistance do not lie. Professor Steven Jones' electron spectrometry imaging on the WTC dust that proves that super-thermate was used does not lie. The government's own records of them paying Urban Moving Systems do not lie. 9/11 was an inside job.

  • @RandleEl11 "Have you heard of dis-information agents?"

    EXACTLY!!!!

    Shortly after the Pilots for truth made it perfectly clear the Pentagon story was lies, the disinfo about 'no places at WTC' arose. It is true, no polane at the Pentagon, but two did strike the towers.

    I can write about what I was reading the night of the attack regarding commercial planes safety features for hijack recovery, and all the bookmarked pages I had on it disappearing on the 12th... inside job 100%

  • @SlackerSlayer Did you mean to type "no planes"? If you did, the idea of no planes does appear to have some merit. I'm not saying that it's true, but there is clear evidence that some of the video that was broadcast that day was manipulated and edited. That, combined with other unexplained things and inconsistencies relating to eyewitness testimony, leads some people to say that no planes were used. Some kind of aircraft was probably used, but not the ones that we were told were used.

  • @RandleEl11 Yes I did intend to write 'no planes'. As I said, the "no planes" at NYC is a red herring to drag eyes away from the fact that no plane had an impact at the pentagon.

    Sept clues is a poor disinfo program. The maker has no idea how digital pictures are formd, especially when the camera has a maxed out hardware zoom, and then some tech does another software zoom on top of that. Yes you will get a "nose out" with that kind of data manipulation.

  • @SlackerSlayer I'm not talking about any enhanced video that was used in September Clues or any other video that tries to prove any of this. I'm talking about the clear "errors" in the original broadcast footage. It's worth looking into because it's very obvious.

  • @SlackerSlayer Another disinfo trick making a come back is the "mini nukes" because of Tritium found in some samples (plus the craters and a few other excuses). That stuff is used in EVERY emergengy exit sign at every exit, and at every emergency sign to show you the way to an exit further down a hall.

    So if any of you hear of any Tritium residue came from a mini nuke being used at WTC, ignore or correct them on it.

  • this is breaking everyone, send this video to everyone you can

  • Interesting information presented here..

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more