I like firebirds I used to have one but I love my '06 Mustang GT...I dont think your bird would have kept up with that Stang...he runs high 8-seconds so he would have your ass. Lol but Pontiac went under because of the gov't but you can order a 2011-2013 Trans am you just goto GM's website.
That's funny, I own nothing but Firebirds 305 with automatic transmissions, and still dust 5.0 mustangs. No one will race me here anymore because of it. I'm not saying mustangs are bad, because they start off impressive, but they soon fade. I almost bought a mustang that I thought could take my car, until I dusted it in a race, I'm stickin with the bird.
YEAH MOST OF YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THE 5.0s would out performed THE 3RD GEN F-BODIES BUT FROM 1993 WITH THE LT1 AND THEN THE LS1 MUSTANG WERE NO COMPETITION FOR F-BODIES.
back in the late 90s I had an 87 IROC 350 auto, I thought that car was the best till I drove my buddies 87 5.0 5 speed. needless to say I sold the IROC 1500 less than what I payed for it then took out a personal loan to buy 90 LX 5.0 that car was awesome! only car I ever had that would grab 4 gears of rubber. babies came the car got sold
bro my gta has somthing for your mustang ..... 373 gears in rear fast burn heads big plenum runners modified computor, headers roller cam rockers ect. lotsof horse power and a tuned suspention with a 700 r built trans with a 300 stall. and no stangs can hang that are street legal not even those sh@tbys tear them up. I admit though like the new stangs better than the new cameros. They just look better and are a better car for the $
@gmfastburn,,,you need to do your research,ford took out a hugh loan in 2006 to restructure,unlike chevy that bilked the american taxpayer out of 43 BILLION dollars and now continue as if nothing ever happened,they even hav their fans thinking ford went bankrupt..big difference man,,get out of that chevy long enough to get the TRUTH.....................
Why all the hate? I own an ls1 car, have had several fbodies, and a few mustangs. Each have their pros, and cons. We're all car enthusiasts. Just get along!!!
@ADD8oi thanks man,check that gear in that 5.0,i pulled out an 2.73 ratio in my '90 gt and put in a 3.73 ratio and left motor stock,minus k&n filter.that geared me in the same ratio as corvettes,irocs,and formula ta's.rated at lower hp than them,i bet them all day long from light to light.just match there rear end ratio and you'll bet them with less cubes!
Respond to this video... well at least ford did'nt go bust/broke from poor quailty and low sales and i live to see the day they go bankrupt again,and they are going to soak the public's pocket in the process!!!
those t-a gta's could never get out of they on way.i know,i use to bust them all the time,when i could find one,with my 5.0 bac in the late 80's...so now 20 yrs later,dont be telling everybody what a barn burner it was because i was there and it was not and besides that car company went out of business because of poor quality and low sales...................
@51mcm I agree. I had an '86 GT 5.0 and dusted those F-bodies of the day ALL DAY, EVERYDAY. 350's back then were not what they wound up being in he late 90's and early 2000's.
@51mcm i agree, i have an 85 trans am, 5.0's walk off and leave me when i am in it. but my buddy has an 87 and eats stock 5.0's its all in the cars. But for the most part the 5.0 in the mustang was right it was a light car and a good motor. But pontiac went out of business cause of a decision made my higher ups (i think buick should of been cut instead) but since pontiac didnt have an original car of their own besides the G8 (all other cars were just a fancy version of a chevrolet) they got axed
@51mcm Doesn't matter, run up on a Trans Am that has 10 grand in his motor...doesn't matter if you buy a Chevy or Ford, whoever has the most money will win.
@51mcm I don't think Pontiac went out because of poor quality and low sales. I think they went out because Nancy Pelosi still has her head stuck in there.
@51mcm Hmm, one of the fastest if not thee fastest T/A's ever made was an 89 Turbo T/A, and no stock 5.0 could hold a candle to them. And stock 302's are really nothing to get excited about, stock block 302's are notorious for splitting down the valley when going past 700HP, and if you want to play with the big boys using a windsor engine, best you get a boss block or man-o-war block. And in a 80's T/A, what serious player leaves them stock anyhow?
@GMisurdaddy not even close to the fastest trans am. the fastest third gen maybe, but those turbo 3.8s were only making 250 hp. not too much more than the v8s.
@RicerEater1978 You know nothing about the Buick V6 then, go on any board, do research on these engines that "250 HP" rating was under stated, and never go by power ratings, they mean nothing, its real world tests and performance that tells the tale. 89 Turbo T/A's have been as fast as 13.4 in the quarter(stock)
That tells quite a different tale than 250HP would allow.
@RicerEater1978 excerpt from GM High Tech Performance: "While these motors were rated at 250 flywheel horsepower to appease the Corvette crowd, in actuality, the TTA motor reportedly made 301 hp on the PAS engine dyno."
@51mcm 80s trans ams were just camaros. only thing that really set them apart was the ws6 suspension. mind explaining what a barn burner is? never heard the expression
All F-bodied owners think there all that.. Dont forget , The Mustang has been very compeditive with only 4.6 liters. Ive blown away LT1 F-bodies, stock on stock with my 06 GT. The LS1 powered cars do get me by about 2 carlengths in the 1/4. I still say, very impressive to be so close with only 4.6Liters...I have done some mods now thow. So i cant wait to recompare. Now the new 5.0lL is one to watchout for. Here we go again. Ford outperforming with a smaller engine..
@mustangcobramike hmm. i beat an ls1 easy with 2 boltons and a tune. and i have an 05 GT manual. I am putting down 310RWHP and our car is lighter than an ls1 camaro. my 1/4 mile is 13.5secs at 105MPH.
I have a 2002transam that has never been beat by a mustang. ford putstiny ass engines and have to put a superchager just to make it get out of its own way and run 12s. but charge my car and i promise ill run 11s
That was a nice Mustang GT. Trans-Am's are definitely faster rides though and of course I mean stock for stock. It also depends on the years were talking too.
we can all argue gm this, ford that, what if honda, nissan will be... all of us tuners know when we are driving down the road there is very few cars we see that has the balls to pull on our modded rides... thats why we are here, just respect each other. there is always somebody faster with deeper pockets...
@1969Stingray427 I need to learn something?? Just as an FYI, these Mustangs are SOHC while the Firebird is of an OHV design. Check your facts rocket joe.
@mgeek13 Actually, that isn't true. It hasn't been the case since as far back as 2002 if you are familiar at all with the different Mustang trims available from the factory. Thanks for playing, though! We have some wonderful door prizes for you.
@mgeek13 Yea, dream on. BTW, you needed and EXTRA 70 cubic inches to accomplish this great goal. Congrats, a car with a 350 CID engine can beat up on one with a 281. WOW!
that 8.whatever is in the 1/8th mile. cause if that stang was running 8s in the quater he would have not been running down the highway. there would have been a cage. and such. that is a full 2 seconds slower in the 8th than any stock fbody, manual or standard. mustangs are so over rated either way. the splash that the "sporty" car makes might carry a long time but that is simply because there are alot of girls and bitches that need something to drive. buy a real car if you want to race!
for all you gm fans out there yeah its true they do put out more horsepower than the stang always have,not that ford can't do the same they just don't want to put too much into a car for people to go out there and get killed,they leave it to the consumer to buy aftermarket parts to get out there and take care of business,the camaro and trash am don't have staying power like mustang an icon,they make a splash then they disappear i expect the same with this new camaro.
Well this is hardly a fair race haha, granted the T/A and Irocs were superior in the 80's pitting one against a newer Mustang just isnt even a contest. Also im not a fan of any brand just muscle cars in general but i gotta admit, displacement is a big thing, especially if you're a fan of N/A engines, id rather have an N/A 6.0 than a supercharged 5.4 myself, and the LS engines are just phenominal, ive never seen a broken LS1 or LS3 that goes a long way for me
haha, very true, and a lot of people say GM under rated the LS1 as to not detract sales from the Corvette (which they've been known to do many times in the past, especially with the old 455 Super Duty T/A) one interesting note, superchevy magazine tested a stock LS1 and reached hp ratings nearing 400hp...of course this was at the crank but still, its an interesting note to toss around in your head haha.
they were built to beat stangs, but the foxbodys alwasy beat the f bodies. power isnt everything. light cars + decent power is better then heavy car + higher power.
true.. the only mustangs that culd even hang were the saleen s281s and cobras.. fuck roush and the rest.. and still the cobra and s281 need superchargers so ford fails lol
ford doesnt fail. stop being a gm fanboy and love all muscle cars. if you want to say that ford needs superchargers, i can say gm needs 5.7l+ engines to beat a ford 4.6l. so then i could say gm fails. but im not. ford makes smaller engines, gm larger ones.
im not a chevy fan boy 1stoff.. and second bigger displacment doesnt mean much besides a stronger block and can handle more boost MAYBE.. so its not always an upside..
you really dont understand engines, dont you? you honestly dont know why the 4.6 is better proportionally than the 5.7? do some research bud... ill give you a hint, DOHC!
@lmorrow4 At least the Trans Am looked really good for three generations and were faster than Mustangs for four generations. The 3rd gen mustangs look like a hunk of junk that I would never consider driving. The 4th gen mustangs are yet again terrible but better than its previous generation. The newest mustangs are the best since the 70's. There just ok. The only muscle car coming out today that I think looks cool is the new Dodge Challenger. Those things are going to be classics.
@watthefishy2 Your opinion which of course is NOT shared by hundreds of thousands of others with eyes that actually work. I will agree that the slow pig Challenger does look good, just don't go hunting any other "muscle cars" with it.
@ADD8oi While your comparing 2005 mustangs to an unknown 2002 'chevy car' ill compare a 01 5.7L trans am to an 82 four cylinder mustang and see what happens.
@watthefishy2 in reference to the F-body build cars, the camaro and trans am, that would be a more fair comparison, but without a doubt the only cars ford built in 99-02 that could blow the doors off the F-bodys were the Cobra-Rs........yeah lol
@watthefishy2 theres actually a list of good ones past the 70s. Mach 1, 99-01 cobra, 03-04 cobra, 05-09 stock for stock can actually run neck and neck with transams, the new GT500s (both gens), the GT500KR, Super Snake, Roush mustangs, Saleen mustangs, and can't exclude the new 5.0 (426hp)
@ShamusOGrady2 Based on looks the Super Snake and Roush mustangs are nice looking because they resemble the older ones. If your talking about power and torque i'm sure they'd blow almost any Trans Am away and most any stock car but then again those cars aren't stock. The new mustangs have power but Nissans are coming out with 325+ hp stock six cylinders. If you compare '10 mustangs to other '10 cars it doesn't seem incredibly impressive.
@watthefishy2 ya but the thing tht rly pisses me off is if they put a turbo if any kind in a nissan and then ppl start to say well it cam e 325 stock from the fact, yea but its forced induction put a turbo in the new 11 stangs ...ur pussing 500 hp in a v6 let alone a kb s/c in the 5.0 alrdy have dynoed to at 650-700hp AT the wheels....again just saying.
@JoNNyJ777 Exactly! Not that it matters because a ford guy will find the way to make his mustang faster than his neighbors camaro regardless of what year it is and vice versa. Is a money game.
@xBlAcKX0XMaGiCx thats another thing that makes them great. when you see one its like "whoa", but when you see a mustang its like"wow thats the 100th one ive seen today"
i see the gta taking it just because it has a MUCH bigger v8. gt's used to have 302's in them until they went down to the 281. an 89 GTA has a 350. Not to mention that older cars are definitely built with more quality. lol i did a neutral drop in my 87' firebird and my friend did the same in his 95 camaro. it snapped his driveshaft in half. My car still drives great. that was almost a year ago.
the 4.6l is a better engine then the 90's 5.0, in stock form that is, with some after market work, like heads, intake, exhaust, the 5.0 becomes a fairly potent engine, but it will never have the same potential as a 350 because of the difference in displacement, but to run a stock gta against say a stock 94 gt, that would be a fairly good race, and even better with a 4.6 gt
we are talkin about a stock car with a 281 cubic inch engine and you bring up a purpose built 540 cubic inch race car! wow! and i never heard of a 69 540 supercoupe i know they put 454's in camaros not 540's. and ok put your baldwin motion on the track next to a ford thunderbolt or a 427 shelby cobra from the mid 60's or since baldwin motion was a aftermarket tuner how about the saleen s7? we could do this all day. they are all amazing cars.
it's so funny when people argue about different cars isn't it? "My car will kill yours!", "My car will woop your car's ass." and here's mine. D-U-M-B-A-S-S-E-S
American car owners need to stop fighting and focus on ending the plague of ricers. We need to stick together and fight off the imports. Kinda like the American Revolution. Then after thats done, we can have our Civil War :)
wow you really are a redneck. I never knew every import was a 4cyl or Honda...Well sonny, I have a 1.3l, if you know cars you can guess what it is ;) And Ive burned plenty of american cars and been beat...by a stang on nitrous which is cheap.
lol dude, I never said that all imports are 4 cyl Hondas. And I dont see why you think I'm a redneck. And if I was, whats wrong with being a redneck? And dont you feel great knowing that your engine is smaller than a bottle of soda? 8>4 go back to school. lol. seriously though, if you could actually afford a V8 you wouldnt be so uptite.
rape it i said i ve been dealing cars for years and i have owned both it is not even a race.minimum spread 8 car legths in a quarter mile drag race.A 05 and up gt is a mid 13 car auto or stick.
an avrage lt1 car goes 14.0 to 14.2 average gt 05 and up 13.5 to 13.7 at that speed do the math it is about 7 to 8 car leghts.97 mph trap speed vs 103 mph .
Again, wrong, stock LT1's have been clocked at high 13's STOCK! They dig way better than that Mustang trash and have nasty low end. I have a mild cam in it and I promise no new GT will put 7-8 car lengths on me. By the way, 7-8 car lengths is probably like a second on the track.
Your talking about a car that is almost a 15 Year Difference Than a 93 lt1 yea race an ls1 then see what what happens and tha't still not a fare race cuz it only goes 2002. But years dont matter an lt1 would still kick You Ass
what an awsome race why the fuck do ppl put vs if theres no race involved or some gay ass montage put trans am and mustang if its gonna be this gay ass shit
yur buddy has to have mechanical problems or you got some internals you dont know about man cuz stock those 5.0's are NOTHING compared to an LS1...not knockin yur ride, I like stangs, it's just a fact.
With that slow of a time he shouldnt have been running pro trophy or ET would be more his class. He wouldnt be the first mustang i seen change time and class on his window AFTER he left the track.
if im right i think this car is from B.C canada prob just came down from thunder mountain raceway. tmr witch is a 1/8 mile track.. just a home run track at 8000 feet elevation. were pro class is 9:00 or faster a 400 hp mustang could easly make the class
there was a car in the way of the mustang you dumbasses, the mustang will beat that poniac piece of shit anyday
718mattmatt 4 months ago
@718mattmatt All serious...lol take it easy man..its just a pink striped Mustang.
tangledline 3 months ago
I like firebirds I used to have one but I love my '06 Mustang GT...I dont think your bird would have kept up with that Stang...he runs high 8-seconds so he would have your ass. Lol but Pontiac went under because of the gov't but you can order a 2011-2013 Trans am you just goto GM's website.
LimeStangGt 4 months ago
yeah uhm the 98-02's are the fastest trans am from the factory,
pontiac went out of business for all its terrible cars besides the trans am.
just sayin
btw i like mustangs, i just like my 2000 ws.6 more
xyzdorky66 5 months ago
Trans Ams are the best, so suck it Mustang!
Deathbymonkeys77 6 months ago
97 people are friends with the slow idiot that got in the way of the mustang! ;)
firewolf2462 6 months ago
That's funny, I own nothing but Firebirds 305 with automatic transmissions, and still dust 5.0 mustangs. No one will race me here anymore because of it. I'm not saying mustangs are bad, because they start off impressive, but they soon fade. I almost bought a mustang that I thought could take my car, until I dusted it in a race, I'm stickin with the bird.
darry3275 7 months ago 2
YEAH MOST OF YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THE 5.0s would out performed THE 3RD GEN F-BODIES BUT FROM 1993 WITH THE LT1 AND THEN THE LS1 MUSTANG WERE NO COMPETITION FOR F-BODIES.
tadubs 7 months ago
back in the late 90s I had an 87 IROC 350 auto, I thought that car was the best till I drove my buddies 87 5.0 5 speed. needless to say I sold the IROC 1500 less than what I payed for it then took out a personal loan to buy 90 LX 5.0 that car was awesome! only car I ever had that would grab 4 gears of rubber. babies came the car got sold
taryn302 10 months ago
@taryn302 man had to sell it?!?!?!?!? shit man i wouldve kept it and bought a minivan with a soccer sticker on it LMAO long live muscle cars FTW baby
Halo3CovenantKillaz 4 months ago
bro my gta has somthing for your mustang ..... 373 gears in rear fast burn heads big plenum runners modified computor, headers roller cam rockers ect. lotsof horse power and a tuned suspention with a 700 r built trans with a 300 stall. and no stangs can hang that are street legal not even those sh@tbys tear them up. I admit though like the new stangs better than the new cameros. They just look better and are a better car for the $
fta4worldcom 1 year ago
@fta4worldcom I hope you meant 3000 stall :D
sounds like a good setup, if your ever in Dallas come find me and we can race!
GOMEZ99Christian 9 months ago
@gmfastburn,,,you need to do your research,ford took out a hugh loan in 2006 to restructure,unlike chevy that bilked the american taxpayer out of 43 BILLION dollars and now continue as if nothing ever happened,they even hav their fans thinking ford went bankrupt..big difference man,,get out of that chevy long enough to get the TRUTH.....................
51mcm 1 year ago
Why all the hate? I own an ls1 car, have had several fbodies, and a few mustangs. Each have their pros, and cons. We're all car enthusiasts. Just get along!!!
BlackRS28 1 year ago
pony cars...
killdac 1 year ago
Why can't I find a race between a trans am and a 2010 shelby gt500? I could only go for the shelby, though because of the looks.
SmileInVane 1 year ago
An 8.68! Mustangs are freakin weak!
rebelme420 1 year ago
@ADD8oi thanks man,check that gear in that 5.0,i pulled out an 2.73 ratio in my '90 gt and put in a 3.73 ratio and left motor stock,minus k&n filter.that geared me in the same ratio as corvettes,irocs,and formula ta's.rated at lower hp than them,i bet them all day long from light to light.just match there rear end ratio and you'll bet them with less cubes!
51mcm 1 year ago 3
Respond to this video... well at least ford did'nt go bust/broke from poor quailty and low sales and i live to see the day they go bankrupt again,and they are going to soak the public's pocket in the process!!!
51mcm 1 year ago 3
@51mcm oh you are wrong about that. Ford went bust/broke just like GM. You don't have THAT short term memory do you?
gmfastburn 1 year ago
those t-a gta's could never get out of they on way.i know,i use to bust them all the time,when i could find one,with my 5.0 bac in the late 80's...so now 20 yrs later,dont be telling everybody what a barn burner it was because i was there and it was not and besides that car company went out of business because of poor quality and low sales...................
51mcm 1 year ago 7
@51mcm man, i carry that tradition on with my new 5.0.....muscle ftw tho
ADD8oi 1 year ago 5
@51mcm I agree. I had an '86 GT 5.0 and dusted those F-bodies of the day ALL DAY, EVERYDAY. 350's back then were not what they wound up being in he late 90's and early 2000's.
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
oh man we got a internet hater
reggieman02626 11 months ago
@51mcm i have a firebird that smoke what ever you have.... i would love for a 5.0 to run up on me and the ls7
italianbella4lyfe 9 months ago
@51mcm i agree, i have an 85 trans am, 5.0's walk off and leave me when i am in it. but my buddy has an 87 and eats stock 5.0's its all in the cars. But for the most part the 5.0 in the mustang was right it was a light car and a good motor. But pontiac went out of business cause of a decision made my higher ups (i think buick should of been cut instead) but since pontiac didnt have an original car of their own besides the G8 (all other cars were just a fancy version of a chevrolet) they got axed
BlackLS1TA 6 months ago
@51mcm Doesn't matter, run up on a Trans Am that has 10 grand in his motor...doesn't matter if you buy a Chevy or Ford, whoever has the most money will win.
DraikonZ3 5 months ago
@51mcm I don't think Pontiac went out because of poor quality and low sales. I think they went out because Nancy Pelosi still has her head stuck in there.
Superman83271 4 months ago
@51mcm Hmm, one of the fastest if not thee fastest T/A's ever made was an 89 Turbo T/A, and no stock 5.0 could hold a candle to them. And stock 302's are really nothing to get excited about, stock block 302's are notorious for splitting down the valley when going past 700HP, and if you want to play with the big boys using a windsor engine, best you get a boss block or man-o-war block. And in a 80's T/A, what serious player leaves them stock anyhow?
GMisurdaddy 3 months ago
@GMisurdaddy not even close to the fastest trans am. the fastest third gen maybe, but those turbo 3.8s were only making 250 hp. not too much more than the v8s.
RicerEater1978 3 months ago
@RicerEater1978 You know nothing about the Buick V6 then, go on any board, do research on these engines that "250 HP" rating was under stated, and never go by power ratings, they mean nothing, its real world tests and performance that tells the tale. 89 Turbo T/A's have been as fast as 13.4 in the quarter(stock)
That tells quite a different tale than 250HP would allow.
GMisurdaddy 3 months ago
@RicerEater1978 excerpt from GM High Tech Performance: "While these motors were rated at 250 flywheel horsepower to appease the Corvette crowd, in actuality, the TTA motor reportedly made 301 hp on the PAS engine dyno."
GMisurdaddy 3 months ago
@51mcm 80s trans ams were just camaros. only thing that really set them apart was the ws6 suspension. mind explaining what a barn burner is? never heard the expression
RicerEater1978 3 months ago
@51mcm I would take a GTA trans am over a busted rwd pinto any day
nbm2000ws6 1 month ago
All F-bodied owners think there all that.. Dont forget , The Mustang has been very compeditive with only 4.6 liters. Ive blown away LT1 F-bodies, stock on stock with my 06 GT. The LS1 powered cars do get me by about 2 carlengths in the 1/4. I still say, very impressive to be so close with only 4.6Liters...I have done some mods now thow. So i cant wait to recompare. Now the new 5.0lL is one to watchout for. Here we go again. Ford outperforming with a smaller engine..
mustangcobramike 1 year ago 4
@mustangcobramike hmm. i beat an ls1 easy with 2 boltons and a tune. and i have an 05 GT manual. I am putting down 310RWHP and our car is lighter than an ls1 camaro. my 1/4 mile is 13.5secs at 105MPH.
pkidro 1 year ago 2
what do you mean thats a nice mustang??? That sounds like he just has fucking glasspack exhaust!!
Oehlke92 1 year ago
That's just cruel. lol
Third gen F-bodies weren't built for top end speed. That GTA's TPI would have a better chance stop light to stop light.
CollinFalling 1 year ago
Mustangs -- get one and be like millions and millions of other middle 20's lamebrains who thinks it's a quality whip.
Notespompon 1 year ago
I was thinking about becoming a mustang fan, but then i woke up and thought " i gotta stop smokin this shit..."
s10guy3388 1 year ago
AMs stock blows any ford out of the water
Brohenney 1 year ago
i have a 02 ta ws6 too and havent been beat by one....but.....i havent run against a cobra though :S...im pretty sure they would murder me
blackstang2003 1 year ago
I have a 2002transam that has never been beat by a mustang. ford putstiny ass engines and have to put a superchager just to make it get out of its own way and run 12s. but charge my car and i promise ill run 11s
XxSTSTransAmxX 1 year ago
That was a nice Mustang GT. Trans-Am's are definitely faster rides though and of course I mean stock for stock. It also depends on the years were talking too.
IROCwarriorAMC88 1 year ago
we can all argue gm this, ford that, what if honda, nissan will be... all of us tuners know when we are driving down the road there is very few cars we see that has the balls to pull on our modded rides... thats why we are here, just respect each other. there is always somebody faster with deeper pockets...
JPARKERZ28 1 year ago
uR VID SUCKS......
scrappycocoa678 1 year ago
the trans am is faster than this $#!/
TheLegoman28 1 year ago
Do you have a moostasche?
Jaket2000 1 year ago
trans am kill it
Avalanchefannumbaone 1 year ago
hese firebirds were not very fast and ive ridden in a 89 iroc z camaro with a 350 and it was not that fast ether
coltonwithano 1 year ago
#lol nice mustang #i love that car
cristianfotbalistu 1 year ago 2
Hey...it wasnt an old lady driving a mustang...thats a rare site..=p..both are nice cars tho.
TransAmPhantom 1 year ago 2
@1969Stingray427 I need to learn something?? Just as an FYI, these Mustangs are SOHC while the Firebird is of an OHV design. Check your facts rocket joe.
lmorrow4 1 year ago
im pretty sure GM could still make a trans am, and they would be wise to follow thru and make one
c0uchsl0uch 1 year ago
Well dumbass mine did. It ran a 6.87. And it was bone stock.
01FormulaSE 1 year ago
@01FormulaSE No it didnt, STFU
that would be a 500+ hp car
Ls7colorado 1 year ago
Trans Am/ Camaro always been and always will be faster
mgeek13 1 year ago 2
@mgeek13 Actually, that isn't true. It hasn't been the case since as far back as 2002 if you are familiar at all with the different Mustang trims available from the factory. Thanks for playing, though! We have some wonderful door prizes for you.
rtcobb75 1 year ago
@mgeek13 Yea, dream on. BTW, you needed and EXTRA 70 cubic inches to accomplish this great goal. Congrats, a car with a 350 CID engine can beat up on one with a 281. WOW!
lmorrow4 1 year ago
Luv T/A :)
Especially '73 455 SD (or H.O.). They rule
GileraXR1 1 year ago
that 8.whatever is in the 1/8th mile. cause if that stang was running 8s in the quater he would have not been running down the highway. there would have been a cage. and such. that is a full 2 seconds slower in the 8th than any stock fbody, manual or standard. mustangs are so over rated either way. the splash that the "sporty" car makes might carry a long time but that is simply because there are alot of girls and bitches that need something to drive. buy a real car if you want to race!
01FormulaSE 1 year ago
@01FormulaSE Two full seconds slower in the 1/8 mile? F-bodies don't run 6's in the 1/8 mile stock, dumbass.
rtcobb75 1 year ago
@01FormulaSE Formulas were a POS then and they're a POS now
lmorrow4 1 year ago
for all you gm fans out there yeah its true they do put out more horsepower than the stang always have,not that ford can't do the same they just don't want to put too much into a car for people to go out there and get killed,they leave it to the consumer to buy aftermarket parts to get out there and take care of business,the camaro and trash am don't have staying power like mustang an icon,they make a splash then they disappear i expect the same with this new camaro.
stangfever04 1 year ago
Man if this would of been a TTA that mustang would of been left in the dust... :-)
mannyman84 1 year ago
what the hell defines that as any kind of race it false advertising y not just call it drivin with the ford
darklordspike 1 year ago
@ darklordspike Read the info, you dumb motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!111111
joshua6200 1 year ago
Roush wing♥
KarstonLikesMustangs 1 year ago
fucking gay; total waste of youtube memory
johno9445 2 years ago
uuuhhh....sweet race??
tietie1424 2 years ago
Well this is hardly a fair race haha, granted the T/A and Irocs were superior in the 80's pitting one against a newer Mustang just isnt even a contest. Also im not a fan of any brand just muscle cars in general but i gotta admit, displacement is a big thing, especially if you're a fan of N/A engines, id rather have an N/A 6.0 than a supercharged 5.4 myself, and the LS engines are just phenominal, ive never seen a broken LS1 or LS3 that goes a long way for me
Ratmouth66 2 years ago
ls1's are the shit, i swapped one into my 96' 3.8 bird, power is just amazing, what a difference 105 hp makes too!
FDallaround 2 years ago
haha, very true, and a lot of people say GM under rated the LS1 as to not detract sales from the Corvette (which they've been known to do many times in the past, especially with the old 455 Super Duty T/A) one interesting note, superchevy magazine tested a stock LS1 and reached hp ratings nearing 400hp...of course this was at the crank but still, its an interesting note to toss around in your head haha.
Ratmouth66 2 years ago
if its not a cobra its garbage single over head cams suck dick
MrRandy1971 2 years ago
@MrRandy1971
agreed!
INeverDie99 2 years ago 2
where's the race ??? don't see any race!!
cerebraldamage 2 years ago
GM F-Bodies ( Firebird and Camaro ) where build to eat Mustangs !!! Except special models, F-bodies are allways more powerfull than Mustangs !!!
Glory to the Firehawk !!!
alpstorm 2 years ago 4
they were built to beat stangs, but the foxbodys alwasy beat the f bodies. power isnt everything. light cars + decent power is better then heavy car + higher power.
airsoftg0d 2 years ago
@alpstorm They are a POS and they stopped making them. Oh and the new ones are no match for the new Mustangs.
lmorrow4 1 year ago
@alpstorm Car was a piece of crap except the engine.
lmorrow4 1 year ago
well it would be nice to know if the motors in the cars are built to any extent, before anyone criticizes
and even if the stang was shifting like a woman lol
MT6ix4our 2 years ago
Mustangs dont compare to trans ams. Trans ams are much more powerful. I wouldnt ever drive a mustang. Theres no descent mustangs past the 70's.
watthefishy2 2 years ago 25
2007 GT500?
FordGT8806 2 years ago
2007 GT500 got nothing on the GMs,
mustangs were built for looks, not power
trans-ams,comaros,vetts were built for power, not looks GM all the way baby
2realpimp09 2 years ago
that isnt a gt500, and they didnt race. read the description and learn to love all muscle cars. dont be an inconsiderate jackass fanboy
airsoftg0d 2 years ago
i really like you
roketfingers 2 years ago
true.. the only mustangs that culd even hang were the saleen s281s and cobras.. fuck roush and the rest.. and still the cobra and s281 need superchargers so ford fails lol
dddjjf 2 years ago 3
ford doesnt fail. stop being a gm fanboy and love all muscle cars. if you want to say that ford needs superchargers, i can say gm needs 5.7l+ engines to beat a ford 4.6l. so then i could say gm fails. but im not. ford makes smaller engines, gm larger ones.
airsoftg0d 2 years ago
im not a chevy fan boy 1stoff.. and second bigger displacment doesnt mean much besides a stronger block and can handle more boost MAYBE.. so its not always an upside..
dddjjf 2 years ago
@dddjjf
Ever hear the term....(No replacement for displacement?) Larger displacement make's more of a difference than you might think.
MercuryMorrison1 2 years ago
not always
dddjjf 1 year ago
you really dont understand engines, dont you? you honestly dont know why the 4.6 is better proportionally than the 5.7? do some research bud... ill give you a hint, DOHC!
FDallaround 2 years ago
yeah that ford really would have killed. wish could have seen the trans am though.
DylanR2008 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 your face is undescent past the 70's
Norrco998 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 well look at the 2011 that just came out. and where are the trans ams now? gone. forever
ZJCband 1 year ago
@ZJCband Because you cant improve perfection..:p
TransAmPhantom 1 year ago
Comment removed
rtcobb75 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 i think you need to get your head out of your ass moron
JonathanRattayGT 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 Your opinion is not shared by many
lmorrow4 1 year ago
@lmorrow4 At least the Trans Am looked really good for three generations and were faster than Mustangs for four generations. The 3rd gen mustangs look like a hunk of junk that I would never consider driving. The 4th gen mustangs are yet again terrible but better than its previous generation. The newest mustangs are the best since the 70's. There just ok. The only muscle car coming out today that I think looks cool is the new Dodge Challenger. Those things are going to be classics.
watthefishy2 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 Your opinion which of course is NOT shared by hundreds of thousands of others with eyes that actually work. I will agree that the slow pig Challenger does look good, just don't go hunting any other "muscle cars" with it.
lmorrow4 1 year ago 3
@watthefishy2 probably the worst 3 sentences I've ever read in my life
BmoreGT 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 ...youre kidding right? stock for stock the 05+ mustang blew the doors off the 02 Chevy cars
ADD8oi 1 year ago
@ADD8oi While your comparing 2005 mustangs to an unknown 2002 'chevy car' ill compare a 01 5.7L trans am to an 82 four cylinder mustang and see what happens.
watthefishy2 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 in reference to the F-body build cars, the camaro and trans am, that would be a more fair comparison, but without a doubt the only cars ford built in 99-02 that could blow the doors off the F-bodys were the Cobra-Rs........yeah lol
ADD8oi 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 much more powerful? your an idiot
ryanmtanner 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 theres actually a list of good ones past the 70s. Mach 1, 99-01 cobra, 03-04 cobra, 05-09 stock for stock can actually run neck and neck with transams, the new GT500s (both gens), the GT500KR, Super Snake, Roush mustangs, Saleen mustangs, and can't exclude the new 5.0 (426hp)
ShamusOGrady2 1 year ago
@ShamusOGrady2 They didn't make Firebirds after 2002. The newer ones will be faster.
watthefishy2 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 i knew that and what did that have to do with my list of good mustangs after the 70s?
ShamusOGrady2 1 year ago
@ShamusOGrady2 Based on looks the Super Snake and Roush mustangs are nice looking because they resemble the older ones. If your talking about power and torque i'm sure they'd blow almost any Trans Am away and most any stock car but then again those cars aren't stock. The new mustangs have power but Nissans are coming out with 325+ hp stock six cylinders. If you compare '10 mustangs to other '10 cars it doesn't seem incredibly impressive.
watthefishy2 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 ya but the thing tht rly pisses me off is if they put a turbo if any kind in a nissan and then ppl start to say well it cam e 325 stock from the fact, yea but its forced induction put a turbo in the new 11 stangs ...ur pussing 500 hp in a v6 let alone a kb s/c in the 5.0 alrdy have dynoed to at 650-700hp AT the wheels....again just saying.
minicobra01 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 ww.youtube.com/watch?v=5cjxO7QhMAE&feature=related
sunaal24s 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 exept for the 2011 5.0 and the 2011 v6. so yea
kryptonek88 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 how about in 2011? with new 5.0 v4?
JoNNyJ777 1 year ago
@JoNNyJ777 Exactly! Not that it matters because a ford guy will find the way to make his mustang faster than his neighbors camaro regardless of what year it is and vice versa. Is a money game.
EZFI 1 year ago
@watthefishy2
2011 ford mustang 5.0?? over 415 hp. Not to mention the gt500 super snake for 2010 which has 720 hp.
bballchris21 1 year ago
@bballchris21 That's nice. Too bad they don't make Trans Am's anymore so we can't compare them.
watthefishy2 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 the new super snake which is badass makes 720-ish. they have a vid on youtube. and the 2011 mustangs r pretty fuckin nice
mexico12ism 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 LOL
ADD8oi 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 where are the trans ams now?
xBlAcKX0XMaGiCx 1 year ago
@xBlAcKX0XMaGiCx thats another thing that makes them great. when you see one its like "whoa", but when you see a mustang its like"wow thats the 100th one ive seen today"
80srockforever 1 year ago
@watthefishy2 Your the minority in that opinion...
cantbsdave 1 year ago
@cantbsdave Certainly doesn't make me wrong, just more informed.
watthefishy2 10 months ago
uhhh what was done to that pretty stock looking stang to still have the "predicted" 8.68 1\4 time? I hope you talking about 1\8 instead?
cobracon13 2 years ago 4
i see the gta taking it just because it has a MUCH bigger v8. gt's used to have 302's in them until they went down to the 281. an 89 GTA has a 350. Not to mention that older cars are definitely built with more quality. lol i did a neutral drop in my 87' firebird and my friend did the same in his 95 camaro. it snapped his driveshaft in half. My car still drives great. that was almost a year ago.
mambobro 2 years ago
the 4.6l is a better engine then the 90's 5.0, in stock form that is, with some after market work, like heads, intake, exhaust, the 5.0 becomes a fairly potent engine, but it will never have the same potential as a 350 because of the difference in displacement, but to run a stock gta against say a stock 94 gt, that would be a fairly good race, and even better with a 4.6 gt
PhilG88 2 years ago 2
ok id like 2 see whimpy little ford beat a 69 baldwin motion camaro 540 supercoupe the stang would be begging for mercy
metalhealth12 2 years ago
i'd like to see you jump off a cliff but we dont always get what we want do we?
bluecapone 2 years ago 6
agreed!
m3talman774 2 years ago
we are talkin about a stock car with a 281 cubic inch engine and you bring up a purpose built 540 cubic inch race car! wow! and i never heard of a 69 540 supercoupe i know they put 454's in camaros not 540's. and ok put your baldwin motion on the track next to a ford thunderbolt or a 427 shelby cobra from the mid 60's or since baldwin motion was a aftermarket tuner how about the saleen s7? we could do this all day. they are all amazing cars.
BLACKLACDTS 2 years ago
i like the little spoiler on that stang. i love the saleen ones even more.
CHRIS454 2 years ago
it's so funny when people argue about different cars isn't it? "My car will kill yours!", "My car will woop your car's ass." and here's mine. D-U-M-B-A-S-S-E-S
Enzo393 2 years ago
ya right that mustang would woop that tras ams ass...
ladyrose99 2 years ago
YES!!! The RX7 is hot. Though I'd rather throw this one in my Formula, RB26DETT. Mwuhahahahaha!!!!
3000gtovr4 2 years ago
American car owners need to stop fighting and focus on ending the plague of ricers. We need to stick together and fight off the imports. Kinda like the American Revolution. Then after thats done, we can have our Civil War :)
p8ntball15 2 years ago 2
that is why i own a ford mustang chevy camaro and pontiac trans am so when the war starts i have heavy artillery
GRYNCHESP 2 years ago 4
redneck. I know plenty of imports that can burn a hole into a american car. A engine is a engine...redneck.
BigIrick 2 years ago
lol what makes you think I'm a redneck? a v8 is better than a 4 cylinder pos. accept the fact and go die in your little honda
p8ntball15 2 years ago 3
wow you really are a redneck. I never knew every import was a 4cyl or Honda...Well sonny, I have a 1.3l, if you know cars you can guess what it is ;) And Ive burned plenty of american cars and been beat...by a stang on nitrous which is cheap.
BigIrick 2 years ago
lol dude, I never said that all imports are 4 cyl Hondas. And I dont see why you think I'm a redneck. And if I was, whats wrong with being a redneck? And dont you feel great knowing that your engine is smaller than a bottle of soda? 8>4 go back to school. lol. seriously though, if you could actually afford a V8 you wouldnt be so uptite.
p8ntball15 2 years ago
1.3l = rotary. (rx7)
BigIrick 2 years ago
my brother has a rx8 with a rotary. I have a trans am with a v8. I win every time. Go redneck v8 power!
daveszoltysik 2 years ago 4
rotary dies at 100k mikes. junk.
ttinmystang28 2 years ago 3
dude stfu about all that redneck shit and grow some balls
StevenTheCelebrity 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gm raped ford since day fucking one
2realpimp09 2 years ago
lol are you kidding. Did you see the Mustang hit it's brakes. Yea. Ok. Day one.
Dshaws90fordf150 2 years ago
when was this i dont remember lol
98MustangGT46L 2 years ago
Mustang sounds weak, little pussy car. GO GM!!!!
Horrorshow655321 2 years ago
Yea really weak... thats why it says 8.68 ont he side of the window... must be slow..
russnord 2 years ago 3
I would say the whole Ford Chevy battle can end now, since one of them can't even stay afloat on their own.
cj52racers 2 years ago 4
It's going to be OM soon. Obama motors.
Dshaws90fordf150 2 years ago
yea no kidden because hes the one that helped them get back up
98MustangGT46L 2 years ago
haha yea dude, for real. thats gonna suck
p8ntball15 2 years ago
that mustang would smoke ur ass all day long STFU
98MustangGT46L 2 years ago
that isnt a race. that is called driving.
scared2mosh 2 years ago 4
what a useless video, anyway a stock 07 gt ,would rape an lt1 93 to 97 trans am
camirocz 2 years ago
Wrong, from a roll maybe, from a stop, nope. One couldn't touch mine that's for sure..
pikeymutt 2 years ago
rape it i said i ve been dealing cars for years and i have owned both it is not even a race.minimum spread 8 car legths in a quarter mile drag race.A 05 and up gt is a mid 13 car auto or stick.
camirocz 2 years ago
I've seen STOCK LT1's with street tire get high 13's. 8 car lengths? lol!
pikeymutt 2 years ago
an avrage lt1 car goes 14.0 to 14.2 average gt 05 and up 13.5 to 13.7 at that speed do the math it is about 7 to 8 car leghts.97 mph trap speed vs 103 mph .
camirocz 2 years ago
Again, wrong, stock LT1's have been clocked at high 13's STOCK! They dig way better than that Mustang trash and have nasty low end. I have a mild cam in it and I promise no new GT will put 7-8 car lengths on me. By the way, 7-8 car lengths is probably like a second on the track.
pikeymutt 2 years ago
its all for the love of the cars, not whose is better or what brand, just love the cars
primus2010 2 years ago 6
Your talking about a car that is almost a 15 Year Difference Than a 93 lt1 yea race an ls1 then see what what happens and tha't still not a fare race cuz it only goes 2002. But years dont matter an lt1 would still kick You Ass
aldoe9 2 years ago
wow, that video sucked, they were suppose to race
mopar20s 2 years ago
EPIC FAIL
funnystupid 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
mustangs are a joke.
RDHILDE18 2 years ago
By any chance did the guy in the mustang just come down from Thunder Mountain Raceway?
jrd6108 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
┏┫ ｜ ｜ ┣┓ ┏┓ copy and paste
┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫ this if you hate ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ retarded idiots ┗━━┳━┳━━┛ ┃ ┃ who waste your time
bmwstrrcr 2 years ago
they arent even racing. cant you see the mustang let off the gas. they are crusing at about 50 mph, the motors arent even reving.
cafender99 2 years ago 3
what an awsome race why the fuck do ppl put vs if theres no race involved or some gay ass montage put trans am and mustang if its gonna be this gay ass shit
alpinestargt 2 years ago 7
This vid is lame....
Shadofx 2 years ago 4
no way an old carbed 5.0 can hang with an ls1...
yur buddy has to have mechanical problems or you got some internals you dont know about man cuz stock those 5.0's are NOTHING compared to an LS1...not knockin yur ride, I like stangs, it's just a fact.
4mulaBaby 2 years ago
wheres the race and whats with the 8.68 pass at 160 on the windows lol...
smotpoker15 2 years ago
Prob just came from a 1/8 mile track, diald in 8.68 sec for bracket racing, the 160 would be his compatition number
jrd6108 2 years ago 2
With that slow of a time he shouldnt have been running pro trophy or ET would be more his class. He wouldnt be the first mustang i seen change time and class on his window AFTER he left the track.
HKuspDADDY 2 years ago
if im right i think this car is from B.C canada prob just came down from thunder mountain raceway. tmr witch is a 1/8 mile track.. just a home run track at 8000 feet elevation. were pro class is 9:00 or faster a 400 hp mustang could easly make the class
jrd6108 2 years ago
how do you know this class is 400 hp my bone stock 2000 SS went 8.64 at 84. But then again it would take a 400 horse stang to run the same
HKuspDADDY 2 years ago