no matter what even of your one of those russian haters that talks shit about them constantly...u gota give them props for this helicopter...its the most battle tested and proven piece of machine there is I dont think any piece of military equipment in the world has seen more action than the mi-24
Apache has been shot down by old man with rifle of ww2 times ))) xD also one episode was in Afghanistan when Mi 24 got shot 7 times from stinger but he still was in air and landed in base. i am sure mi 24 is reliable machine .
Well actually I heard the same stuff about Soviet helies back in 1980s, while we still were under USSR. Rumor was towelheads were aiming for the rotor's head. I believe Mi-24 may survive this, but I'm not so sure about Mi-8, which initially was a civilian (well, as something Soviet can be civilian) design.
Besides Mi-24 had several upgrades to improve protection (like thermal covers on exhausts you see here) during war in Afghanistan, and that's not without good reason.
@kamododragoon and if i don't get on at least an Apache or cobra. wait! forget the hind! i want the cobra and apache! (or possibly a AC-130 Gunship :) )
@aegis174 Yeah, the MI-35 is the export version of the MI-24, it also features all of the latest upgrades (such as nightvision, improved cockpit, etc)
@hackerisslv Javelin is anti-tank smart one. Besides, these things HAVE been hit by Stingers and survived before. And the Apache would go down easier anyway.
@b0n3z3z sry .. miss-wrote :D stinger.. and talking about apache and stinger.. dont know but when russians went in war with iraq .. stinger was taking down Mil's all the time :P .. lets base on facts.. not some imaganation images.. as far i know no apache have been shot down by javelin :)
@hackerisslv 1) Russia never went to war with or in Iraq, hell the Soviet Union didn't either
2) Yes the Stinger did a lot of damage to Mils, but there were also common cases where the Mi-24 would take a direct hit and survive.
3) The reason an Apache has never been shot down by a Javelin is because, again, that is an anti-tank missile. Assuming you miss-wrote again, an Apache would go down VERY easy by a Stinger, though.
@b0n3z3z Apache would go down VERY easy by a Stinger, though.<< How do you know? look at statistics.. NO Apache have been shot down by stinger... but mi-24.. well you can find 3 page list with mi's that have been shot down
AND again.. Sry about javelin :D:D Stupid word .. fucking my brains :D..
@hackerisslv Mi-24s have more armor, and are heavier built. They won't go down as easy, period. Along with this, the Mi-24 is faster, can carry more armament, and has troop carrying capacity. Obviously, Apache loses.
@hackerisslv Ok first of all, helicopters don't get all freaking close like they do in CoD, second fewer than 75 MI-24's were lost in the 10 YEAR Afghan war, all the pilot needs to do is the right evasive maneuver, flares, and then turn back on YOU.
@TEHGROUND i know that the cod and real life are to different things.. and helicopters that were used in afgan war didnt have any countermeasure system..
@hackerisslv Wrong wrong wrong... A couple of hinds/hips were shot down so the Soviets upgraded them with countermeasures and tactics to avoid the stinger missile. Didn't completely extinguish the Stinger threat, but it reduced it immensely.
@hackerisslv Ok. Then the reason is probably that Soviet doctrine includes much low-flying attack runs. Americans tend to shoot from far as possible. Of course Hind has huge exhausts but that issue has been lowered in the later models. I think Hind and Apache are both just as easy to shoot down with a Stinger.
@hackerisslv Yeah. That´s exactly what it proves. USA does have better tactics than Soviets did, but that doesn´t prove that Apache would be somehow harder to shoot down with a Stinger than Hind. Stinger can drop anything that flies. Americans just fly so high that it can´t reach them.
@Militarija The Apache is newer, but i have to differ in apache and "multirole" - Which helicopter, if not the Hind, is Multirole? It was designed to drop bombs, to transport Cargo, Ammunition or Soldiers (Afaik the only combined cargo-gunship-helicopter) or, in special versions, even for scientific purposes (measurement of radiation and particles, a few hinds were specially modified for this purpose with external robot-arms for taking soil samples and devices for scientists in the cargoroom)
Mi-35 is the name of the export version of the Mi-24.
And both have modernized models too.
Latest models of hinds have shorter stub wings and fixed lading gear in addition to stuff you see in this vid (multi function displays etc).
But that's just me recalling stuff from memory - can't guarantee what I've said is 100% correct - if somebody finds mistake in my comment, please correct me. :)
Needs lower logistics requirements and maintenance too for operate correctly and is mechanically simpler too than most common attack helicopters, for example the Mi-28 replaces it as combat helicopter.
That is for people compare that with totally different concepts as the AH-64 and even specialised versions of that copter as the Longbow.
Hind can't be compared. His concept makes it much less maneuverable than common attack helicopters, is heavily armoured than most (despite the A version, most helicopter versions are up to 23mm hits proof), have the secondary transport capability (usually used for carry a mechanic or rarely for infiltrate commandos) and too is faster.
There are more derivatives, with upgrades have now can have decent electronics and FLIR per his cost.
The new Ataka missiles are at least comparable to Hellfires. The brute firepower a Hind can deploy is because his original plan really (original design as VCI, powerful engines, rotor design, ...) and modularity. Can carry appart from the 32 x 57mm missiles pods, 20x80 mm missiles pods and 240 mm individual missiles, additional 23mm gun pods, and even aviation bombs up to 500 kg each.
There are more derivatives, with upgrades have now can have decent electronics and FLIR per his cost.
The new Ataka missiles are at least comparable to Hellfires. The brute firepower a Hind can deploy is because his original plan really (original design as VCI, powerful engines, rotor design, ...) and modularity. Can carry appart from the 32 x 57mm missiles pods, 20x80 mm missiles pods and 240 mm individual missiles, additional 23mm gun pods, and even aviation bombs up to 500 kg each.
The standard configuration in Mi-24V carry 8 missiles Shturm, no 4, because the system carries 2 AT missiles per pylon.
The main gun depends the version:
- Rotative four-barreled HMG Yak-B12.7 mm, can sustain a 4500 dpm rate of fire. Rounds depends to the machine gun pod and go from 750 to 1470. Standard in most versions.
- Double autocannon GSh-30-2, 30 mm. Mi-24P, Mi-35P. 750 rounds.
Mi-24 series concept (Mi-35 is the export version of Mi-24V) is as a "fliying infantry combat vehicle" , multirole helicopter or assault helicopter not a pure combat helicopter (despite can do it very well). The counter-part to the Apache are the Mi-28 and the Ka-50, Mi24/25/35 have no West equivalent really.
Hind is the NATO codename, not the name of the helicopter, and armaments depends the version, in later versions can carry Shturm, Ataka and even R-73.
The only helicopter in the world that can chop off its own tail in sudden movement...Mi-35 still came out too late...by about 10 years. Too bad there isnt any market for it anymore.
Guys, quit arguing over which is better, the apache is a GREAT helicopter as is this, I also HIGHLY doubt we will ever, ever, EVER find out mainly because I doubt Russia will ever go to war with America, and if it does, we will see which is better, so quit arguing, and accept they are both great aircraft.
@TEHGROUND Actually, it's quite likely we will find out, Russia's not shy about exporting to nations frequently at odds with the west. It's predecessor, the Mi24 has been involved in a lot of non-Russian conflicts in the hands of other nations. Considering the ammount of nations opperating exported Russian armaments, I'd say the likeyhood of finding out how good they are in combat is actually quite high. Comparing the Hind to the Apache does seem silly though, they're not made for the same job.
The best helicopter is the one with the better pilot it doesnt matter if its the Apache Longbow Block III or the MI-35 if the apache has the better pilot itll win if the Mi35 has a better pilot then The 35... it just works that way.
Sorry I flew this in BF2MC and its not better than apache apache apache is faster, speed wins I know what i'm talking about because I have many hours in choppers on the xbox
@FlightFan It is the apache? Fuck off. the apache has more firepower, greater range, more stealth and larger variety of weapons - you shouldnt even be comparing the two helicopters - the Apache is a Helicopter gunship, the Mi-35 is a Light attack chopper with Troop carrying capabilities
@Tehpolev What???? Apache has more firepower, greater range, more stealth and larger variety of weapons??? Fantasy!!! Don't tell it whomever!! It's funny at least. Look somehow characteristic and confer. Apache better in electronic equipment only/
@mironboss65 the hind uses a 50 caliber gun, yes. Also im not comparing them, it was a reply to another person's comment who said it was better then the apache
@Tehpolev@Tehpolev can't you see how many missiles this dragon carries? mi-24/ mi-35 has more powerful engines to carry the troopers and the weapons load. that makes it bigger in size (less stealthy), slower (when fully loaded), and clumsier. but hey, it can give a hell of a firepower and drop troopers, cover them, and rescue. amazing stuff. don't worry about weapons, there's more than enough for doing dirty works.
@sohcsarewicked You know because you flew it in a game? You fucking dumbass. Thats like saying the world will end in 2012 because you saw it in a movie....
@sohcsarewicked Wow you must be STUPID or something or believe to much in Video games.... Which makes me wonder how much of your life you base off info from Games and not researching it. And if your serious i Pity you
@sohcsarewicked You're kidding me right? I mean seriously you are basing your opinion on something you did in a video game and not on real world experience? WTF has this world come to? You don't know enough about real helicopers and real military maneuvers to make a statement that matters. The Mi-35 plays a completely different role on the battlefield from the AH-64. You can't compare the two at all. The Mi-28 is closer to the AH-64 but I guarantee you haven't been in either one.
@sohcsarewicked Xbox? o yeah, playing in console is the best simulation ever, the most realistic. LOL Even the best PC simulators are very limited...Console games are not real simulators are arcades...
@135twilight Iknoright, I was looking at some of these comments (on some heli videos) and apparently, these people have the IQ of a 10 year old. (meaning: they are stupid) Like first of all, they think helicopters have to go incredibly close to attack when they can do that from a miles away, (I believe that this has come from the video game known as CoD.)
@sohcsarewicked Videogames aren't entirely accurate, n00b. flying helicopters in a videogame gives you no experience and doesn't make you cool. You're not a helicopter pilot. You're a gamer with no life thinking you're cool. Now go away and learn. Go. Now.
@sohcsarewicked You are such a fucking retard, you DON'T know what you're talking about. Battlefield? Really? Have you even flown one in real life? Hell, have you even played a simulator? Why don't you actually look at the specs of a Mil Mi-35 versus an Apache, then you'll see which is faster. Get off the internet, child.
um i hope you people understand that there is a large difference between us and Soviet heli's. When comparing apachi with Mil-apachi is faster and design to shoot and leave, Mil's design to fight that why they're slower but also have lots of armor, its not in the same class. now Kamov vs apachi is closer but still Soviet heli's a more of tank busters and "air artillery". rather then usa helis are convoy and troops support.
@75spa Apache is not made for hit and run apache is made to stay out of enemy range floating in air and destroy form long distance that is why its code name is longbow to strike from long distance,dont forget hind is only choper to this day that shoted down military jet plane,and no it wasnt some shitty plane it was french mirage that was at that time one of best NATO jets,so that speed diference isnt such big advantage when it comes to chopers
lol one reason why this helicopter beat the apache and thats because apache pilots are pussys so the very first sight of the mi 35 would scare them away.
Love the Mi24 / Mi35 ! The devils chariot named by the afgans in the war with the soviets in 1979-1980 thanks to the american stinger missle we brought these flying beasts down to earth BOOM !
it remains me like the hornet from halo 3
godzillamaster90 1 week ago
in soviet russia they make helicopter that looks like MI-24 but not MI-24 it's called the MI-35 lol
BFloverhateCOD 1 month ago
@BFloverhateCOD The export versions called Mi-35 and Mi-25.
Talshet 1 week ago
@kamododragoon tomorrow :D
Hendrik597 2 months ago
Boogy man!
ZVERCO666 2 months ago
peru venezuela brazil take mi-35m and mi-35p but is better than
other helicopter is attack and transport good for fs operation
TATARSTAN59500 2 months ago
mi-35p exactly
TATARSTAN59500 2 months ago
Russians helicopters: It looks aweful but it works (thebest).
Aryanpars 3 months ago
I love that Soviet technology.
Thank you very much.
Klappfall 3 months ago
Ну все янки вы попали =) Мажте жопу вазелином)))))
misha3995 4 months ago 2
Soviets constructors are best engineers in the world.
ghos7bear 5 months ago 11
@28215sterneGeneral
You're right, it's not the size of the wave, but the motion of the ocean.
LoL Keep it up Bro!
1woozoo 6 months ago
The OP is a moron. Doesn't know his weapon's systems from a shit hole in the ground. Nuff said.
1woozoo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no matter what even of your one of those russian haters that talks shit about them constantly...u gota give them props for this helicopter...its the most battle tested and proven piece of machine there is I dont think any piece of military equipment in the world has seen more action than the mi-24
konischev 6 months ago
/watch?v=AEjx4O9bHyM
MilitaryofRussia 7 months ago
pew pew
SrNutritivo 7 months ago
Apache has been shot down by old man with rifle of ww2 times ))) xD also one episode was in Afghanistan when Mi 24 got shot 7 times from stinger but he still was in air and landed in base. i am sure mi 24 is reliable machine .
Realgeezzzz 7 months ago 6
@Realgeezzzz
Well actually I heard the same stuff about Soviet helies back in 1980s, while we still were under USSR. Rumor was towelheads were aiming for the rotor's head. I believe Mi-24 may survive this, but I'm not so sure about Mi-8, which initially was a civilian (well, as something Soviet can be civilian) design.
Besides Mi-24 had several upgrades to improve protection (like thermal covers on exhausts you see here) during war in Afghanistan, and that's not without good reason.
SwineNahNah 7 months ago
LOOK AT THOSE GUNS!! Jesus! They tilt it back when they fire!
b0n3z3z 7 months ago
@kamododragoon well, there are 7 of those kickin around the US, civilian owned... go hunt one down ;)
ArnhemKnight117 7 months ago
@kamododragoon and if i don't get on at least an Apache or cobra. wait! forget the hind! i want the cobra and apache! (or possibly a AC-130 Gunship :) )
parcer4401 8 months ago
@parcer4401 Afganistan controled by Americans prefer old czech Mi-24. Inded that crap that you wish ....
FMorris308 8 months ago
meanest looking helicopter around!!!
shammy63 8 months ago
@aegis174 Yeah, the MI-35 is the export version of the MI-24, it also features all of the latest upgrades (such as nightvision, improved cockpit, etc)
TEHGROUND 9 months ago
Meh. U.S Apache is better
conkerkillers4 9 months ago
@conkerkillers4 In video game apache is better... in real life Mil's crush all!
BusinessKi11ER 9 months ago 35
@BusinessKi11ER I would love to see a FRIENDLY dogfight between Russia's choppers and America's choppers!
blowupuate13 7 months ago
@blowupuate13 Iran, Iraq War buddy!
BusinessKi11ER 7 months ago
@BusinessKi11ER tell that to javelin ;)
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv Javelin is anti-tank smart one. Besides, these things HAVE been hit by Stingers and survived before. And the Apache would go down easier anyway.
b0n3z3z 7 months ago
@b0n3z3z sry .. miss-wrote :D stinger.. and talking about apache and stinger.. dont know but when russians went in war with iraq .. stinger was taking down Mil's all the time :P .. lets base on facts.. not some imaganation images.. as far i know no apache have been shot down by javelin :)
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv 1) Russia never went to war with or in Iraq, hell the Soviet Union didn't either
2) Yes the Stinger did a lot of damage to Mils, but there were also common cases where the Mi-24 would take a direct hit and survive.
3) The reason an Apache has never been shot down by a Javelin is because, again, that is an anti-tank missile. Assuming you miss-wrote again, an Apache would go down VERY easy by a Stinger, though.
b0n3z3z 7 months ago
Comment removed
hackerisslv 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@b0n3z3z en.wikipedia org/wiki/The_Soviet_Union_and_the_Iran–Iraq_War read about this article ;)
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@b0n3z3z Apache would go down VERY easy by a Stinger, though.<< How do you know? look at statistics.. NO Apache have been shot down by stinger... but mi-24.. well you can find 3 page list with mi's that have been shot down
AND again.. Sry about javelin :D:D Stupid word .. fucking my brains :D..
hackerisslv 46 seconds ago
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv Mi-24s have more armor, and are heavier built. They won't go down as easy, period. Along with this, the Mi-24 is faster, can carry more armament, and has troop carrying capacity. Obviously, Apache loses.
b0n3z3z 7 months ago
@b0n3z3z based on statistics.. apache is better :P
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv the hind can transport infantry!!!!! the apache is just a attack heli !!! that are different things!!! omg
28215sterneGeneral 7 months ago
@28215sterneGeneral true.. but still the infantry isnt any good if stinger can shoot it down :P
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv you and your stinger... yes big helis are easy targets to hit but they have more armor!
its importent how you use it. all i say is that are two different typs of helis. sometimes its better to use a hind or sometimes a apache!!
28215sterneGeneral 6 months ago
@28215sterneGeneral :D i know it sounds like i'm obssest with stinger :D but all i know is based from statistics ;)
hackerisslv 6 months ago
@hackerisslv Ok first of all, helicopters don't get all freaking close like they do in CoD, second fewer than 75 MI-24's were lost in the 10 YEAR Afghan war, all the pilot needs to do is the right evasive maneuver, flares, and then turn back on YOU.
TEHGROUND 6 months ago
@TEHGROUND i know that the cod and real life are to different things.. and helicopters that were used in afgan war didnt have any countermeasure system..
hackerisslv 6 months ago
@hackerisslv Wrong wrong wrong... A couple of hinds/hips were shot down so the Soviets upgraded them with countermeasures and tactics to avoid the stinger missile. Didn't completely extinguish the Stinger threat, but it reduced it immensely.
TEHGROUND 6 months ago
@hackerisslv Who would shoot Apache dow with a Stinger? Both are used by same militaries. Any army that Apache has gone against hasn´t had stingers.
qelleri 7 months ago
@qelleri in 2003 iraq had stingers and AA defences.. but they were use less against apache and other us military aircraft's ;) ..
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv Ok. Then the reason is probably that Soviet doctrine includes much low-flying attack runs. Americans tend to shoot from far as possible. Of course Hind has huge exhausts but that issue has been lowered in the later models. I think Hind and Apache are both just as easy to shoot down with a Stinger.
qelleri 7 months ago
@qelleri This shows that usa have better tactics.. Shooting from far range reduces chanse of being hit by stinger or rpg
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@hackerisslv Yeah. That´s exactly what it proves. USA does have better tactics than Soviets did, but that doesn´t prove that Apache would be somehow harder to shoot down with a Stinger than Hind. Stinger can drop anything that flies. Americans just fly so high that it can´t reach them.
qelleri 7 months ago
@qelleri correction.. not high but far ;)
hackerisslv 7 months ago
@BusinessKi11ER if someone don´t crush mil
90magor 7 months ago
@BusinessKi11ER
Who the fuck are you? You don't know shit but claim like you know.
Fucking internet speicalist, fu and your retarded family, learn then open your mouth ;)
buymeamic 3 months ago
@BusinessKi11ER Nope ic not beter than mi-35in apache air assault :)
Boljev6 3 months ago
@BusinessKi11ER That's why in battlefield 3 they the ah-1z Viper LOL!
TheMightyOxY 2 months ago
@conkerkillers4 too much Xbox dude too freaking muck tctctc
Wolfgamer94 8 months ago
@conkerkillers4 They're designed for different mission. Try to compare AH-64D with Mi-28N and you'll see a great rival!
NoFuckingEgo 8 months ago
@conkerkillers4 Apache is newer design, and Apache has different role (multirole) this is pure gunship. AH64 you can sompare to Mi28N or KA50.
Militarija 8 months ago
@Militarija The Apache is newer, but i have to differ in apache and "multirole" - Which helicopter, if not the Hind, is Multirole? It was designed to drop bombs, to transport Cargo, Ammunition or Soldiers (Afaik the only combined cargo-gunship-helicopter) or, in special versions, even for scientific purposes (measurement of radiation and particles, a few hinds were specially modified for this purpose with external robot-arms for taking soil samples and devices for scientists in the cargoroom)
346L3 8 months ago
@346L3 Hind is "attack gunship", apache is "multirole attack helicopter". Hind doesnt have radar thats main reason why Hind is not "multirole".
Militarija 8 months ago
@Militarija compare Apeche to Havoc
8900609 7 months ago
RUSSIA No.1 !!!
1968drale 9 months ago 3
For some reason, I'm not impressed.
wjp255 9 months ago
lol BRAZIL IS THERE SUCH AN AIRPLANE
TheQuest500 10 months ago
i miss the old 4 barreled minigun thumbs up if u agree
helicopterwar247 10 months ago
Why do people say it looks ugly? It is such a beautiful machine!
Zartan1357 10 months ago
whats the difference between the Mi-35 and the Mi-24?
DarkstarNovembr 10 months ago
@DarkstarNovembr
the name.
Mi-35 is the name of the export version of the Mi-24.
And both have modernized models too.
Latest models of hinds have shorter stub wings and fixed lading gear in addition to stuff you see in this vid (multi function displays etc).
But that's just me recalling stuff from memory - can't guarantee what I've said is 100% correct - if somebody finds mistake in my comment, please correct me. :)
Suyamu 10 months ago
Russian weapons sucks!
Dulcorate117 10 months ago
Needs lower logistics requirements and maintenance too for operate correctly and is mechanically simpler too than most common attack helicopters, for example the Mi-28 replaces it as combat helicopter.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
That is for people compare that with totally different concepts as the AH-64 and even specialised versions of that copter as the Longbow.
Hind can't be compared. His concept makes it much less maneuverable than common attack helicopters, is heavily armoured than most (despite the A version, most helicopter versions are up to 23mm hits proof), have the secondary transport capability (usually used for carry a mechanic or rarely for infiltrate commandos) and too is faster.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
There are more derivatives, with upgrades have now can have decent electronics and FLIR per his cost.
The new Ataka missiles are at least comparable to Hellfires. The brute firepower a Hind can deploy is because his original plan really (original design as VCI, powerful engines, rotor design, ...) and modularity. Can carry appart from the 32 x 57mm missiles pods, 20x80 mm missiles pods and 240 mm individual missiles, additional 23mm gun pods, and even aviation bombs up to 500 kg each.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are more derivatives, with upgrades have now can have decent electronics and FLIR per his cost.
The new Ataka missiles are at least comparable to Hellfires. The brute firepower a Hind can deploy is because his original plan really (original design as VCI, powerful engines, rotor design, ...) and modularity. Can carry appart from the 32 x 57mm missiles pods, 20x80 mm missiles pods and 240 mm individual missiles, additional 23mm gun pods, and even aviation bombs up to 500 kg each.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
Comment removed
DanKovsev 10 months ago
The standard configuration in Mi-24V carry 8 missiles Shturm, no 4, because the system carries 2 AT missiles per pylon.
The main gun depends the version:
- Rotative four-barreled HMG Yak-B12.7 mm, can sustain a 4500 dpm rate of fire. Rounds depends to the machine gun pod and go from 750 to 1470. Standard in most versions.
- Double autocannon GSh-30-2, 30 mm. Mi-24P, Mi-35P. 750 rounds.
- Double autocannon GSh-23-L , 23 mm. Mi-24VP, Mi-24VN, Mi-24 VM, Mi-35VP, Mi-35M3, 450 rounds.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
Mi-24 series concept (Mi-35 is the export version of Mi-24V) is as a "fliying infantry combat vehicle" , multirole helicopter or assault helicopter not a pure combat helicopter (despite can do it very well). The counter-part to the Apache are the Mi-28 and the Ka-50, Mi24/25/35 have no West equivalent really.
Hind is the NATO codename, not the name of the helicopter, and armaments depends the version, in later versions can carry Shturm, Ataka and even R-73.
DanKovsev 10 months ago
Comment removed
DanKovsev 10 months ago
I dont know what to comment
about the helli or about the most retarded comment i ever seen
LMAO AN A XBOX
LighterBen 11 months ago
western avionics? still russian lol
UseUrHead503 11 months ago
@UseUrHead503 world made in china
pavel280488AA 11 months ago
amazing video!
paradamed 11 months ago
During Afghan war, many mujahedin fears Hind more than Allah himself
crumcon 1 year ago
this shit is just too intimidating
crumcon 1 year ago
Just wondering... how is a instrumental track "explicit"?
pyrewyrm 1 year ago
mi-35 is just sexy ! ^____^
GdeGodTiDaIgras 1 year ago
its really really scary.
Ahamster1 1 year ago
Abrams tanks are screwed if this beast shows up
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago 2
@Elfulcrum777 not if they have the Trophy system
Ahamster1 1 year ago
@Ahamster1 whats that ?
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Elfulcrum777 just check it up on youtube, Trophy Active Defense System from Rafael.
Ahamster1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ahamster1 Your Trophy system can save from chines RPG only.
mironboss65 10 months ago
Why is there Apache: Air Assault music? This is a Hind not an Apache xD
TFormerGuy 1 year ago
If hell exists... whatever was in the gun barrel at 0:33 found it.
chrisakky 1 year ago
ok apache is better BUT I LIKE MI 35 MORE.
RUSSIA FOR EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FROM YOUR GREEK BROTHERS
ionkostas 1 year ago
if hell exists, thnen it can fuck right off cos russia has got this
just stand still while a hind pops over the horizon and then Bang your at hell
koolaidportal64 1 year ago
thats one bad ass helo
zx12ryder 1 year ago
When I went to Poland I saw the Polish version using US and Russian technology.. I must say it was a impressive "flying tank"..
mackjsm 1 year ago
have a look at that canon! I'm sorry, my dick length aside, that is a BITCH! super fucking awesome helo! makes me come every time I see it.
Crawlerz2468 1 year ago
The only helicopter in the world that can chop off its own tail in sudden movement...Mi-35 still came out too late...by about 10 years. Too bad there isnt any market for it anymore.
looxgood 1 year ago
OMG it even has a windshield viper!!!!!!!!!! I AM SO GONNA GET THIS HELI
123LilSerb123 1 year ago
Is this Hind model any more lighter than the other models?
namikodo 1 year ago
mi 35+joystick much better then xbox 360)))))))))))
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
Inception music? ahahahah great movie..!
TonyFirelli 1 year ago
Superb.
Lemaure44 1 year ago
i love these choppers! i wish we had em here in america :)
rapidfirz97 1 year ago
Guys, quit arguing over which is better, the apache is a GREAT helicopter as is this, I also HIGHLY doubt we will ever, ever, EVER find out mainly because I doubt Russia will ever go to war with America, and if it does, we will see which is better, so quit arguing, and accept they are both great aircraft.
TEHGROUND 1 year ago
@TEHGROUND Actually, it's quite likely we will find out, Russia's not shy about exporting to nations frequently at odds with the west. It's predecessor, the Mi24 has been involved in a lot of non-Russian conflicts in the hands of other nations. Considering the ammount of nations opperating exported Russian armaments, I'd say the likeyhood of finding out how good they are in combat is actually quite high. Comparing the Hind to the Apache does seem silly though, they're not made for the same job.
xylaphonemaster 10 months ago
@xylaphonemaster hmmm, agreed. But what we can argue is whether the MI-28 is better than the apache :D
TEHGROUND 10 months ago
Mi-35 Mi-24 is only for sale to other countries and in Russia it's Mi-24
nurikanov 1 year ago
Whats the difference between the Mi-25 and the Mi-35?
Mutterjunge 1 year ago
Two different helicopers are shown, 0:22 - 0:55 is turret-less Mi-24P with fixed side-mounted 30mm cannon
qwedcxyaqwedcxya 1 year ago
What about games. Modern weapons made on the basis of pressed and forgotten. It is so easy to kill a terrorists playing a computer game.
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
More Russian junk
very old and rusty from Soviet times
eee545 1 year ago
Looks like as dragonfly.
lukasvip7 1 year ago
conza410 tell that to a British apache pilot.. i double dare u.. ur the fucking keyboard general that only says shit behind a computer screen.
ApacheLongbow1225 1 year ago
The best helicopter is the one with the better pilot it doesnt matter if its the Apache Longbow Block III or the MI-35 if the apache has the better pilot itll win if the Mi35 has a better pilot then The 35... it just works that way.
ApacheLongbow1225 1 year ago
xbox trolls attack))))))))
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
@pavel280488AA LMAO!!!!!!!!!
testbooster 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry I flew this in BF2MC and its not better than apache apache apache is faster, speed wins I know what i'm talking about because I have many hours in choppers on the xbox
sohcsarewicked 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Mi-35 it is Apache with pickup and inside about 6 troopers. Try to fly with that complect.
FlightFan 1 year ago 14
@FlightFan i think u may be right on that one
sohcsarewicked 1 year ago
@FlightFan It is the apache? Fuck off. the apache has more firepower, greater range, more stealth and larger variety of weapons - you shouldnt even be comparing the two helicopters - the Apache is a Helicopter gunship, the Mi-35 is a Light attack chopper with Troop carrying capabilities
Tehpolev 11 months ago
@Tehpolev What???? Apache has more firepower, greater range, more stealth and larger variety of weapons??? Fantasy!!! Don't tell it whomever!! It's funny at least. Look somehow characteristic and confer. Apache better in electronic equipment only/
mironboss65 10 months ago
@mironboss65
Apache = 38 Hydras, 8 hellfires and 1200 30mm rounds
Hind = 30 Hydras, 4 GPU8 and 1200 12.7mm rounds
Tehpolev 10 months ago
@Tehpolev Strange! You compare old Hind and new Longbow!! Very strange! What are you said??? Hind has 12 mm gun and that's all???? Is it a joke???
mironboss65 10 months ago
@mironboss65 the hind uses a 50 caliber gun, yes. Also im not comparing them, it was a reply to another person's comment who said it was better then the apache
Tehpolev 10 months ago
@Tehpolev Сlear!!!!!
mironboss65 10 months ago
@Tehpolev @Tehpolev can't you see how many missiles this dragon carries? mi-24/ mi-35 has more powerful engines to carry the troopers and the weapons load. that makes it bigger in size (less stealthy), slower (when fully loaded), and clumsier. but hey, it can give a hell of a firepower and drop troopers, cover them, and rescue. amazing stuff. don't worry about weapons, there's more than enough for doing dirty works.
nazirdjon 9 months ago
@sohcsarewicked sooo... you know whitch helicopter is better in life, because you play a lot with your xbox? you can't be serious... :)
shadowgn 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked are you high in BFBC2 you only get to fly the mi28 and mi24 and yet there about the same as the apache
hchamp10 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked You know because you flew it in a game? You fucking dumbass. Thats like saying the world will end in 2012 because you saw it in a movie....
clawbog2 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Your joking right?
SuperleggeraVW 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Wow you must be STUPID or something or believe to much in Video games.... Which makes me wonder how much of your life you base off info from Games and not researching it. And if your serious i Pity you
Fistofmail 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked You're kidding me right? I mean seriously you are basing your opinion on something you did in a video game and not on real world experience? WTF has this world come to? You don't know enough about real helicopers and real military maneuvers to make a statement that matters. The Mi-35 plays a completely different role on the battlefield from the AH-64. You can't compare the two at all. The Mi-28 is closer to the AH-64 but I guarantee you haven't been in either one.
Obinjess 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked "...many hours in choppers on the xbox"? You aren't serious are you? Wow.
RCAF432Sqn 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Xbox? o yeah, playing in console is the best simulation ever, the most realistic. LOL Even the best PC simulators are very limited...Console games are not real simulators are arcades...
gargoloso 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Wow, give him an XBox and suddenly he thinks he knows about helicopters...
135twilight 1 year ago 55
@135twilight Iknoright, I was looking at some of these comments (on some heli videos) and apparently, these people have the IQ of a 10 year old. (meaning: they are stupid) Like first of all, they think helicopters have to go incredibly close to attack when they can do that from a miles away, (I believe that this has come from the video game known as CoD.)
TEHGROUND 1 year ago
@135twilight these bastards have been spoiled by CoD
maxxbad17 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked
Apache gets owned from an assault rifle.
Yup, beat that in you game.
Galvanidze 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked Videogames aren't entirely accurate, n00b. flying helicopters in a videogame gives you no experience and doesn't make you cool. You're not a helicopter pilot. You're a gamer with no life thinking you're cool. Now go away and learn. Go. Now.
cornhonky434343 1 year ago
@sohcsarewicked lmao nerd fuck
xxjuanchox 11 months ago
@sohcsarewicked wow take a damn break no life
triggerhappybullets 11 months ago
@sohcsarewicked facepalm....disgrace u
bf2player140 11 months ago
@sohcsarewicked xbox? really?
DeliriousHD 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked *facepalm* you are idiot *I know what I'm talking about*
Meat21nax 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked yo games arent real life...
SMJeOma 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked You are such a fucking retard, you DON'T know what you're talking about. Battlefield? Really? Have you even flown one in real life? Hell, have you even played a simulator? Why don't you actually look at the specs of a Mil Mi-35 versus an Apache, then you'll see which is faster. Get off the internet, child.
lb8068 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked
sure , playing games which is about fun and not the reality (bf2mc? you trollin?) makes you not just expert , but ace pilot
sirhalyavshik 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked shiiet if you know about choppers cuz of your xbox then I have my CPL from flight simulator oooo yeaaaa
fsrodolfitocarlos 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked LOL JESUS, are you fucking kidding me? wowwwwwww
secretpolice 10 months ago
@sohcsarewicked dont be retard
TheMickyGMan1 10 months ago
Not betther than RAH 66 Comanche... Fuck you fucking russia !!
BrockenZ39 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BrockenZ39 no fuck you pussy troll
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
@BrockenZ39 Yeh maybe despite the fact the whole Commanche thing was cancelled. ;)
Kotty11 1 year ago
um i hope you people understand that there is a large difference between us and Soviet heli's. When comparing apachi with Mil-apachi is faster and design to shoot and leave, Mil's design to fight that why they're slower but also have lots of armor, its not in the same class. now Kamov vs apachi is closer but still Soviet heli's a more of tank busters and "air artillery". rather then usa helis are convoy and troops support.
75spa 1 year ago 2
@75spa Apache is not made for hit and run apache is made to stay out of enemy range floating in air and destroy form long distance that is why its code name is longbow to strike from long distance,dont forget hind is only choper to this day that shoted down military jet plane,and no it wasnt some shitty plane it was french mirage that was at that time one of best NATO jets,so that speed diference isnt such big advantage when it comes to chopers
obrad79 8 months ago
lol one reason why this helicopter beat the apache and thats because apache pilots are pussys so the very first sight of the mi 35 would scare them away.
conza410 1 year ago
such an awesome machine... I want one.
bjoernswe 1 year ago
this is matrix!!!!!!1
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
Can someone please tell me the name of that music track?
thelazyreader 1 year ago
lol that is a big gun!
grasess 1 year ago
yae I'll stick with the AH 64.
Herbymac0811 1 year ago
isnt that a mi 24?
kev1nsky 1 year ago
@kev1nsky it`s deep Mi-24 modernization
Camyrai 1 year ago
Love the Mi24 / Mi35 ! The devils chariot named by the afgans in the war with the soviets in 1979-1980 thanks to the american stinger missle we brought these flying beasts down to earth BOOM !
WarTubeChannel 1 year ago
I just love those side mounted double 30mm guns!
adrianrubi 1 year ago
MIckey mouse 35= Heavy, slow and ancient piece of shit
Cengiz78x 1 year ago
@Cengiz78x
Eh? Hinds are some of the fastest attack helicopters ever build...
Suyamu 1 year ago 13
@Suyamu it IS the fastest
Ahamster1 1 year ago
@Suyamu .....in soviet times lol
maxxbad17 11 months ago
@maxxbad17
Hinds are still being built and exported.
Suyamu 11 months ago