Added: 10 months ago
From: Jesusmalaark11
Views: 9,410
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If you've had an abortion, you're no better than Shawcross. After all, you've killed a child too you know.

  • @WetBreastMeech You don't know the difference, do you?

  • @oeddi666 Can't because there is no difference.

  • @WetBreastMeech It's a dangerously simple world you live in...

  • @oeddi666 and a dangerously convenient one you live in. "Hey let's not use a rubber or the pill, we can just slaughter the l'il guy when he comes along. Then maybe when we decide to let one live, we can entertain him with Halloween horror stories about his dead fetal brother coming to haunt him"

  • @WetBreastMeech Even a rubber or the pill can fail. But that's not my point. I mean it's a difference if I abort ONE fetus that happened to develop by accident, carelessness, or immaturity - or if a completely deranged human being kills three or five or fifty other human beings on purpose using raw violence or even torture to boost his victims' pain. And by the way - I think this matter is too serious to come along with "funny" bullshit like you did!

  • @oeddi666 Hey little buddy! For a while I thought I wasn't going to hear back from you. Maybe you wouldn't be killing a prostitute, but you'd still be murdering a living being who couldn't defend itself just because you fucked up and wanted to take the easy way out. Then there's partial birth abortion - can you really tell me there's any difference between killing a fetus that's carried to full term and is partially out of the womb and killing one that's popped out all the way 10 seconds later?

  • @WetBreastMeech Arg... it's becoming more and more difficult. Abortion never is "the easy way out". It might seem to be to some people, but we both know they're wrong. That "living being" you're talking about can't defend itself because it's still a dependent part of its mother. She has to decide about herself, about her body - and all dependent parts of it. And the last part of your comment I don't understand, I have to confess.

  • @WetBreastMeech (CONTINUING) What are you talking about? I thought this was about serial killers and death penalty. But in the end - what are both of us talking about...? I'm against death penalty. That's it.

  • @WetBreastMeech Sorry - I mixed upour conversation with another one I'm having. I know we didn't talk about death penalty. I'm a bit confused watching such horrible videos. I should quit...

  • I'm sorry, this might offend people but if your barely teenage daughter is walking the sidewalk for drugs, maybe, just maybe you fucked up as a parent ? I would bring her home at gun point and try to get as much money as I can to help her start a new life, it's your kid, how do you even sleep at night knowing she's out hustling on the streets ? Don't be surprised when a cop knocks at your door to tell you that your child is dead because you know that no one was out there to protect her.

  • wow ! there's a room for him in hell with his name on a metal plate.

  • Great show, weird when someone (you?) fast forward it through adverts though, "is someone watching my screen with a remote control!?" .. oh wait.. duh.. -.-

  • @ariba1888 truly amazing!!

  • This Vietnam story is crap, an effort to create justification/ reasons for his behavior

  • I believe he is one of those serial killers that really kills for fun, simply for his sexual urges and the fun of watching his victims die, this v

  • tourette does exist......

  • 9:08 Dr.Park Dietz I love that man he is brilliant watch his interview with Richard 'The Iceman' Kuklinski its absolutely amazing !!!

  • there's a way to shock people and try to make them think you're crazy, tell them you ate vaginas. no wonder this shrink bought into the BS.

  • @Kgheld

    So the evidence of cut out genitals from the victims and bite marks were all fabricated?

  • @30Ciaran cut out genitals doesn't mean he actually ate them! all the prosecution said was MUTILATION-he claimed he ate it but that wasn't proven. Anyone can claim anything and if you are a serial killer that loves the sensationalism of your crimes like this guy why should anyone believe him? he did it for the benefit of his shrink! she was the one testifying he was not responsible at the moment he committed the crimes.

    @HermaphroGynandro who is arguing about other claims by other men?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Kgheld There was one man who claimed he nibbled on some of the uteruses of his female victims. Analysises showed that some of the womens' privates had been butchered. 

  • disassociative identity disorder doesn´t exist......at least not to my knowledge. Hell no! Or maybe it´s inventor was the only one who had it????

  • @mzedong001

    And you're a trained forensic psychologist for how long?

  • @30Ciaran I´m not ´a trained forensic psychologist´- lollol!!

  • @mzedong001

    it exists. it's in DSM

  • @Grayanotoxin DSM is an unreliable document

  • @mzedong001 DID sufferers are a reliable proof of this disorder's existence.

  • @mzedong001 It very much does. That's like saying tourettes doesn't exists. They are rare, but these disorders exist for a reason. Brains are very complicated batteries. I don't think these killers have it though, because they are aware of what they are doing at all times. They lie, and cover up what they have done. They are weak people in the end.

  • @mystikast so hey whats ur problem

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more