how can you compare Bay side's version with Bad Astronaut's version of Megan? There TWO different approaches to a great song and are both AMAZING COVERS
I listened to both, and their version outshines both the original and this one. Only because, in my opinion, the acoustic provides more of a feeling of the lyrics meaning, and I enjoy that. Not that this isn't good, I just enjoy acoustic more, regardless if it's Bayside or not.
I love all the banter between people about what version of this is better......Can't people understand they are different and there doesn't need to be a ranking system. Different people have different tastes and will like different sounds better.......I think they are both rad by the way. Depends what mood I'm in for which one I listen too :)
I'm Megan! :D. I don't think people should be arguing on any of these videos because everyone has their own musical taste, and it's wrong to put people down just because you don't agree with their opinion on the type of music. It's YOUR opinion. Not anyone else's to criticize or bitch about.
Well I'm not gunna be a total dick, but I don't think this cover was that great... not as if his voice was bad or that there was no skill, but as the instrumental part didn't quite match the way the lyrics were ment to be sang.
I hate shit bands with boring trite vocalists like this. Anthony Raneri's voice was perfect for this, but this band is total crap and should be shot for ruining this song.
In all honesty, I feel that this version of the song does overdue it. I think it really takes away from the lyrics and the message the song is trying to convey. The instrumentals are "enhanced" to say the least. In my opinion, I prefer the version with Smoking Popes and Bayside. Good cover non-the less.
people only say this song isn't a good version bc they're all over bayside's nuts. they should look up joey cape and realize where this shit is really coming from, but they're all lazy jerkoffs and prolly think eliot smith's version of needle in the hay is also better than ba's. same lyrics. two totally diff songs. one obviously has to kick more ass. i know where i'm placing my bet.
@koieokei i love how people cant just have there own opinions on whats better and there lazy jerkoffs becase they're musical preference just happens to lead them to the bayside version of this song. but of course that just isint acceptable and just because of somewhons background is shitty makes they're sound so much better.
piano makes this cover. Such a good song in general.
dyingfire4life 4 months ago
Best guitar solo of the three versions for sure
guatemalaandjazz 4 months ago
Bayside, Bad Astronaut, Smoking Popes... Who gives a shit? Listen to the music, and enjoy it.
tRiViUm256 6 months ago
Okay I hate all of these covers! The only way I like this song if it's Smoking Popes... Now everyones gunna hate on me xD
smotherme15243 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
holy hell this is awful.
TURBObengro 10 months ago
Comment removed
TURBObengro 10 months ago
Comment removed
TURBObengro 10 months ago
how can you compare Bay side's version with Bad Astronaut's version of Megan? There TWO different approaches to a great song and are both AMAZING COVERS
nightwave 1 year ago 7
@nightwave kudos
Kurcbn 10 months ago
Bayside.
SKAisJOY 1 year ago
@SKAisJOY stfu fanboy. god quit spamming i saw your comment on smoking popes video to you faggot.
ItWasFanTasY 1 year ago
@ItWasFanTasY
I listened to both, and their version outshines both the original and this one. Only because, in my opinion, the acoustic provides more of a feeling of the lyrics meaning, and I enjoy that. Not that this isn't good, I just enjoy acoustic more, regardless if it's Bayside or not.
SKAisJOY 1 year ago
ole boy sounds like ozzy osbourne. It's kinda funny
genox119 1 year ago
I love all the banter between people about what version of this is better......Can't people understand they are different and there doesn't need to be a ranking system. Different people have different tastes and will like different sounds better.......I think they are both rad by the way. Depends what mood I'm in for which one I listen too :)
markj88888 1 year ago
I think we all know that Smoking Popes' is the best ;D.
Originals are better 90% of the time - not to say I don't like BA's or Bayside's covers or that they are bad, 'cos they are in fact really good.
Plus the Popes are simply the best band of the three, imo.
Crockin91 1 year ago
I'm Megan! :D. I don't think people should be arguing on any of these videos because everyone has their own musical taste, and it's wrong to put people down just because you don't agree with their opinion on the type of music. It's YOUR opinion. Not anyone else's to criticize or bitch about.
juiceboxesarecool 1 year ago
Well I'm not gunna be a total dick, but I don't think this cover was that great... not as if his voice was bad or that there was no skill, but as the instrumental part didn't quite match the way the lyrics were ment to be sang.
fawazie45 1 year ago
this is so good
987657654321 1 year ago 2
I hate shit bands with boring trite vocalists like this. Anthony Raneri's voice was perfect for this, but this band is total crap and should be shot for ruining this song.
bertmollar 1 year ago
@bertmollar now that is quite unnecessary
antiemo9 1 year ago
this takes away from the emotion of the lyrics completely.
bayside's version, in my opinion, is better by far.
NadineeGoesPOP 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this version sucks
rprockets5 2 years ago
amen brother
TheFracturedCrew 2 years ago
easily the best version of this song... 5x more emotive.
thelaibon 2 years ago
In all honesty, I feel that this version of the song does overdue it. I think it really takes away from the lyrics and the message the song is trying to convey. The instrumentals are "enhanced" to say the least. In my opinion, I prefer the version with Smoking Popes and Bayside. Good cover non-the less.
CChainSSolo 2 years ago 2
@CChainSSolo shut your mouth.. i like this version better than the original. this is taking a good song and making it amazing!
tonyrage 1 year ago 2
@tonyrage SHUT YO MAOUTH :3
CChainSSolo 1 year ago
this is such a shitty version of this song..
alk3mizt 2 years ago
this is the best version, u fuckin pussy
nocontrol06 2 years ago
people only say this song isn't a good version bc they're all over bayside's nuts. they should look up joey cape and realize where this shit is really coming from, but they're all lazy jerkoffs and prolly think eliot smith's version of needle in the hay is also better than ba's. same lyrics. two totally diff songs. one obviously has to kick more ass. i know where i'm placing my bet.
koieokei 2 years ago 12
i agree 100%
nocontrol06 2 years ago
@koieokei i love how people cant just have there own opinions on whats better and there lazy jerkoffs becase they're musical preference just happens to lead them to the bayside version of this song. but of course that just isint acceptable and just because of somewhons background is shitty makes they're sound so much better.
DannyDarkout 1 year ago
@koieokei elliott smith's needle in the hay is better ,son!
Dzsek 1 year ago
@koieokei
exactly. smokin popes is classic. bayside is a bunch of scene fags.
onoxtracks 10 months ago
Anthony Raneri made this song the best...This band does an okay job, but it's the worst of the three.
AllTooReall 2 years ago
@AllTooReall i agree 100%
francoXnirvana10 1 year ago
Anthony Raneri attacked the song. I liked his much better, this band kind of over-did it. Good song any way to do it, though.
UberFrederick 2 years ago
I agree. I think I like Anthony's cover better than the original, actually.
unicornhardcore 2 years ago
suck a dick no offense
makingfriendstv 2 years ago
How could that ever be ''no offense''?
UberFrederick 2 years ago
This version is so amazing.
More people need to hear this xD
WARMtrash 2 years ago 7