Surveys note that something like 10% of the population do not believe that man landed on the moon, but that it was just a giant simulation on a Hollywood set. To that group we now must add the "terrorists did not bring down the WTC" crowd. But believe what you want. Faith is not fact.
what this physics animation fails to take into account is that after the plane desintegrates the fusilage which is made of aluminum is shown breaking into sheets and cutting the steel I beams this is impossible as steel is many times harder than sheet aluminum meaning the sheets would merely wrap around the colums not cut through not only but it doesnt explain why the entire building collapsed streight down the I beams below the impact were intact
@ruku871 plus with the angle that the plane hit at the top twenty floors would have been more likely to slide off along the diagonal impact damage the plane had created
Sorry, but the aluminium plane isn't going to slice through the steel beams. Just because the plane was supposably traveling at 520 mph, which was impossible because the plane would have fell apart before it even hit the building at that level; the speed of the plane does NOT change the density of the plane! It is still hollow/thin/light aluminium It will not slice through steel. This simulation is laughable. And look acceleration- no deceleration in "real time" video.
@stephen2152002 "the speed of the plane does NOT change the density of the plane! " "density" does not equal strength you dipshit, Lead is 3 times more dense then steel and titanium is half as dense.
Force = Mass X acceleration . Mass= Plane/ 350K pounds. Acceleration = 500+ MPH Force = 250 MILLION lbs of force. the core column at best were capable of resisting 6 million pounds of force, the perimeter columns even less.
'''wings leading edge were supplied by boeing military, composition classified.''-Truthangator
I HOPE this is some kind of ''official'' study.
I know they've been trying to sell us with words- put to do it on video.. lol... Check out some of the ''scrapping airplanes' videos. You'll see that the very idea of a plane-- cutting or even denting, the STEEL box columns is a fantasy. Airplanes barely rate above a coke can in strength or integrity.
You have no clue how real world physics works. 148-tons of aluminum traveling at 500 mph can easily sever steel box columns. If you think this is impossible because "steel is stronger than aluminum" than perhaps you could explain how icebergs have managed to puncture steel hulls of numerous ships at speeds less than 26 mph. I guess the sinking of the MV William Carson, MS Hans Hedtoft, RMS Titanic, MS Explorer, CSS Hudson etc. are impossible since steel is stronger than ice...right dumbass?
So what was once impossible due to the comparable strengths of 2 materials is now being quantified to include mass. Need a closer example: Kamikaze pilots flying aluminum aircraft punctured through the steel armor hulls and decks of numerous ships in the allied Pacific fleet during WW2. That's a much lighter zero traveling at slower speeds going through SOLID steel. The wings of a jetliner need to be strong enough to provide lift for the entire weight of plane...they aren't fragile coke cans
Any fool who looks at the wtc 'live' videos of the 'plane' entering the structure can see for themselves there wasn't even a ''CRASH''. The ''plane'' melted through the steel and concrete structure- like a ghost. That's NOT physics- its computer animation.
You want people to believe the kamikaze planes ''punctured the steel armor hulls'' when they hit. In reality they most often caused fires or exploded bombs they carried, which did the damage.
@teshnic Very good observation. I guess people do not realize that aircraft are made of very thin aluminium, fiberglass, and plastic. the only conspiracy theory is the one the government is feeding the pblic. There are MANY Pilots out here who know it was a hoax.
@Lazurus464 it was also shown the substandard materials especialy the rivets that held the plates together were used in the construction of the titanic when the impact was made it did signifigantly chip the iceburg but not before popping the rivets in the hull not only but the water tight compartments when the ship was built were supposed to be capped off and have access doors but were left open to cut cost this allowed the water to spill over from one compartment to the next sinking the titanic
this video is stupid. Call this physics? All this video is, is a couple objects colliding in a smooth grid. How on earth is this supposed to be an accurate representation of the WTC?
Not only does it completely miss the true architecture of the WTC, it doesn't show correct dimensions, and therefore the amount of damage each portion would sustain.
Also, this completely contradicts photographs of the central beams found at the site. (pieces of the core columns survived here and there)
OK, If you want to analyze physics then does physics calculate to the amazingly neat pancake effect collapse?
Would the so called terrorists have been able to cleverly calculate that the outcome would be the total collapse of both buildings with only the jets?
Myself, I would need to see someone physically re-do the entire thing with internal cameras under strict supervision to make sure there were no explosives or thermate etc
the plane pushed in sections of columns when the bolts holding the columns together snapped, watch "the crimson skull gets schooled" to see the undeniable proof, only the wing tips sliced thru the steel, the wings leading edge were supplied by boeing military, composition classified.
after the steel wall we are expected to believe that the plane can cut the 5th 4-inch thick steel colum in a row as it goes through the building??? oh they missed out the fireproofing foam around the colums too
Notice how the tail fin fully enters the building-yet-watch as it pans round to show that there is a steel bar in the way, jesus christ even within one minute of glancing at this pish i can prove its bullshit, anyone who thinks a flying beer can can fly though a steel wall like butter and nothing comes off is a complete moron
your simulation is no good and neither is your accent
MrSasan345 4 months ago
@MrSasan345
This simulation isnt done by this guy, but an official one done by professionals.
TheMmnpa 1 month ago
LOL...
Surveys note that something like 10% of the population do not believe that man landed on the moon, but that it was just a giant simulation on a Hollywood set. To that group we now must add the "terrorists did not bring down the WTC" crowd. But believe what you want. Faith is not fact.
badooga 6 months ago
what this physics animation fails to take into account is that after the plane desintegrates the fusilage which is made of aluminum is shown breaking into sheets and cutting the steel I beams this is impossible as steel is many times harder than sheet aluminum meaning the sheets would merely wrap around the colums not cut through not only but it doesnt explain why the entire building collapsed streight down the I beams below the impact were intact
ruku871 1 year ago
@ruku871 plus with the angle that the plane hit at the top twenty floors would have been more likely to slide off along the diagonal impact damage the plane had created
ruku871 1 year ago
Sorry, but the aluminium plane isn't going to slice through the steel beams. Just because the plane was supposably traveling at 520 mph, which was impossible because the plane would have fell apart before it even hit the building at that level; the speed of the plane does NOT change the density of the plane! It is still hollow/thin/light aluminium It will not slice through steel. This simulation is laughable. And look acceleration- no deceleration in "real time" video.
stephen2152002 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stephen2152002 "the speed of the plane does NOT change the density of the plane! " "density" does not equal strength you dipshit, Lead is 3 times more dense then steel and titanium is half as dense.
Force = Mass X acceleration . Mass= Plane/ 350K pounds. Acceleration = 500+ MPH Force = 250 MILLION lbs of force. the core column at best were capable of resisting 6 million pounds of force, the perimeter columns even less.
thebluemaggot 5 months ago
This is very well done but not perfectly accurate.. close though...
Dorisequador 2 years ago
?? wing-tips ''sliccced thru'' the STEEL..?
'''wings leading edge were supplied by boeing military, composition classified.''-Truthangator
I HOPE this is some kind of ''official'' study.
I know they've been trying to sell us with words- put to do it on video.. lol... Check out some of the ''scrapping airplanes' videos. You'll see that the very idea of a plane-- cutting or even denting, the STEEL box columns is a fantasy. Airplanes barely rate above a coke can in strength or integrity.
teshnic 2 years ago
You have no clue how real world physics works. 148-tons of aluminum traveling at 500 mph can easily sever steel box columns. If you think this is impossible because "steel is stronger than aluminum" than perhaps you could explain how icebergs have managed to puncture steel hulls of numerous ships at speeds less than 26 mph. I guess the sinking of the MV William Carson, MS Hans Hedtoft, RMS Titanic, MS Explorer, CSS Hudson etc. are impossible since steel is stronger than ice...right dumbass?
Lazurus464 2 years ago
You're actually gonna compare the fragile wingtips of a plane to the mass of a a iceberg? Who's the dumb-ass.
teshnic 2 years ago
So what was once impossible due to the comparable strengths of 2 materials is now being quantified to include mass. Need a closer example: Kamikaze pilots flying aluminum aircraft punctured through the steel armor hulls and decks of numerous ships in the allied Pacific fleet during WW2. That's a much lighter zero traveling at slower speeds going through SOLID steel. The wings of a jetliner need to be strong enough to provide lift for the entire weight of plane...they aren't fragile coke cans
Lazurus464 2 years ago
Your word play won't cut it here.
Any fool who looks at the wtc 'live' videos of the 'plane' entering the structure can see for themselves there wasn't even a ''CRASH''. The ''plane'' melted through the steel and concrete structure- like a ghost. That's NOT physics- its computer animation.
You want people to believe the kamikaze planes ''punctured the steel armor hulls'' when they hit. In reality they most often caused fires or exploded bombs they carried, which did the damage.
teshnic 2 years ago
@teshnic Very good observation. I guess people do not realize that aircraft are made of very thin aluminium, fiberglass, and plastic. the only conspiracy theory is the one the government is feeding the pblic. There are MANY Pilots out here who know it was a hoax.
graycloud057 1 year ago
Comment removed
albamoog 1 year ago
@Lazurus464 it was also shown the substandard materials especialy the rivets that held the plates together were used in the construction of the titanic when the impact was made it did signifigantly chip the iceburg but not before popping the rivets in the hull not only but the water tight compartments when the ship was built were supposed to be capped off and have access doors but were left open to cut cost this allowed the water to spill over from one compartment to the next sinking the titanic
ruku871 1 year ago
They break the clip connections and ribits used back then like Titanic... and bend the steel at 500miles per hour hitting them.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
Not forgetting the nose was only made of composite plastic and fibreglass.
A realistic simulation would show most of the aircraft smashed and crumpled at street level.
stratocaster539 2 years ago
this video is stupid. Call this physics? All this video is, is a couple objects colliding in a smooth grid. How on earth is this supposed to be an accurate representation of the WTC?
Not only does it completely miss the true architecture of the WTC, it doesn't show correct dimensions, and therefore the amount of damage each portion would sustain.
Also, this completely contradicts photographs of the central beams found at the site. (pieces of the core columns survived here and there)
zapproowsdower 3 years ago
OK, If you want to analyze physics then does physics calculate to the amazingly neat pancake effect collapse?
Would the so called terrorists have been able to cleverly calculate that the outcome would be the total collapse of both buildings with only the jets?
Myself, I would need to see someone physically re-do the entire thing with internal cameras under strict supervision to make sure there were no explosives or thermate etc
FreeGlobalEnergy 3 years ago
the plane pushed in sections of columns when the bolts holding the columns together snapped, watch "the crimson skull gets schooled" to see the undeniable proof, only the wing tips sliced thru the steel, the wings leading edge were supplied by boeing military, composition classified.
911TRUTHINATOR 3 years ago
after the steel wall we are expected to believe that the plane can cut the 5th 4-inch thick steel colum in a row as it goes through the building??? oh they missed out the fireproofing foam around the colums too
keflar5 3 years ago
Notice how the tail fin fully enters the building-yet-watch as it pans round to show that there is a steel bar in the way, jesus christ even within one minute of glancing at this pish i can prove its bullshit, anyone who thinks a flying beer can can fly though a steel wall like butter and nothing comes off is a complete moron
keflar5 3 years ago 2
goggle false flag
TheFoxNewsChannel 3 years ago