Added: 1 year ago
From: 55ella2007k
Views: 1,035
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Frum had a lot of courage writing that piece of truth, good for him. He sees himself as a true conservative, who believes in all the older conservative values. No war, balance the budget, stuff that made sence back before Regan went off his nut. As I remember the talk as a child, my Grandfather was a Conservative and my Dad was a progressive. Grandpa would tell my Dad to save and be prepared for the worse.

  • Grandpa was a saver and "stay at home" kind of guy. An original cowboy. Home and hearth. He was very nervous about my Dad packing up all of us and moving lock, stock and barrel to Calif from Co. Couldn't understand it, too risky, no real fall back. A few years later he followed because he wanted the family to be together. My Dad started his own business, Grandpa worked at what he knew, cattle.

  • George W and Frumm are Neo-Con's, not conservatives.

    Basically, the two parties are one. There is no legitimate US democracy.

  • TV News thrives on heated arguments without any light. Republicans get seduced much more by the anger and fake patriotism.

  • Response to MissingGWdotcom: Any argument in favor of the Cold War, is mute at this point. The hubris of empire, more or less, and I was in favor of detente, not escalation on either side. Which renders all your Cold War arguments as useless from the start, since every single point you are making, is based on this. Shit,even McNamara, a cold-war hawk, if there ever was one, couldn't maintain this position in the end.

  • @HeadLessMunkees Well my Freedom Loving Brother, we are switched ON and that scares the shit out of Liberals. The Silent Majority Giant in this country is wide awake and WE ARE PISSED! The only thing that is going to put us back to sleep is Low Taxes, Small Government and plenty of Former Liberal Offices to fill our belly. It is over, and the DEMS riding the Titanic called "Obama", are jumping ship, regardless of the freezing water. This is our time!

  • What Liberals don't know can fill a fucking Warehouse! When President Bush gave his speech on the USS Lincoln that ship was returning from its deployment to the Persia Gulf! The Mission Accomplish banner was theirs, since their mission was COMPLETE and they were returning to the US; not that the WAR was over! Being a guest on the Ship, GW decided it would be out of line to take the sign down, because they EARNED it.

  • bs. that was pure spin and imagery. complete with that chimp in a navy cover-all. sad

  • @RocketRitch88 : factually, this is accurate. So I have no beef with you on this. But Bush addressed the nation, essentially proclaiming, that the ENTIRE mission of this war was accomplished, not just the mission of this one ship. Rest assured, I have nothing against US service members, who perform their duty, no matter which administration is in power at any given time. And they pay for their duty AFTER their service, unlike politicians, for whom warfare is a revolving door for profit.

  • @55ella2007k, while I disagree with the nuts and bolts of your statement, I agree with the Main Point. Combat Operations are light years easier than Security Operations. By May 2, 2003, an Insurgency in Iraq was not even a thought in DC. At this time major Combat Operations were complete and the Iraqi Army was Defeated. However in early 2004, when thousands of Foreign Fighters started pouring into Iraq to fight us; that threw a wrench in our game plan, which grew into the Iraqi Insurgency.

  • @RocketRitch88 : yes, but you have to remember, that this was all anticipated beforehand, only those, who made those arguments, were sidelined from the start. In fact, several high ranking military brass, saw this coming as well, but they were ignored or ridiculed. Early retirement, as they call it.

  • @55ella2007k, since you "know" so much about Iraq; especially information that is probably at the highest level of National Security and War Fighting: when were you in Iraq and what unit were you with and WHY the fuck are you discussion this shit on FUCKING YouTube?

  • Blah Blah Blah! Hey Granny, I have an idea keep youre fucking day job. I would rather watch monkeys fuck than listen another one of your bullshit videos. You bore me to absolute tears, and your inaccuracies about current events are shocking, but comical at the same time. What is the weather like in your Socialist Utopia?

  • You keep an out, while your at it keep an eye out for the fairies too..... nutcase.

  • Look what will happen in the politics for many years to come. We'll see irrational move from Repubs. in extreme degree and from Deomcs, in less degree worse and worse. They'll just try to make it look logical but it'ds hard to hide the corporate influence.

    Unless we'll get rid of the lobbying system currently we have, this is going to get only worse. Influence of voting power will be next to none.

    Soon, the supremely court decide that appointing the politicians by corporates will be legal.

  • @allgoo19 : this is what I've been saying all along...and thanks for pointing this out as well !

  • Is owning a Buick make me more of an American? Is the Left more likely accurate than the Right?

    Are we all so far to the left that it leaves the Birch Society look liberal?

    Does daylight savings time really make the days longer?

    Everyone wants to rule the world rather than play by the laws of decency?

    What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? Everything

    Thank you Ella for all of your posts!!

  • Interesting point how right-wing talkers don't care so much who wins, so long as their listeners remain angry and keep listening.

    It also exposes who's really in control of these people -- right-wing radio, although I would say really the Republicans are willing to sell themselves to the highest bidder, and most Democrats as well.

  • The only thing the parties have to do is make the other party look worse.

    The entire game is bullshit.

  • for the complete list of 170 items to date see my web site same as my name.

    Obama is a GOP gift from GOD.

  • @MissingGWdotcom: I don't miss GW at all. In fact, GW + Cheney should be in prison for war crimes. I looked at your web-site + your agenda is pretty clear: basically you had no problem with GW/Cheney and you STILL support them. You're entitled to believe this, of course, but don't ever think that you can use my video regarding the GOP as platform for your own cheer leading. Most of my viewers are a bit smarter than this, because this video IN NO WAY endorses the GOP. Quite the opposite !

  • @55ella2007k In prison for war crimes really hows is that? Note 111 DEMs voted for the Iraq war. Note you agree with Nancy?

    I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons." October 10, 2002 Nancy Pelosi

  • @MissingGWdotcom : let me be very clear on this: I was also against the Democrats, when they went along with Bush/Cheney, and voted for NOBODY who was in favor of this war. You need to remember, that Saddam was supported wholeheartedly by the US, including his weapons programs, prior to the Gulf War.  Both sides, Repubs + Dems alike, were denying these facts, in the run up to the war. He used his bio weapons against the Kurds with full US support. Saddam was a pawn.

  • @55ella2007k Look who cares if you were against it, Saddam is no longer a state sponsor of terror funding groups like Hamas, shooting 1500 Kurds girls at a time, hanging Shiites daily in Freedom Square, shooting at USA pilots for 12 years, threatening his neighbors and Israel and France, Germany, Russia, and China are no longer doing illegal businesses with him.

    111 DEMS voted for it, compare this to the ramming of health care, sad

  • @55ella2007k Right we armed Saddam but please get the facts right - Saddam started the war with Iran and we did arm Saddam because the USSR was flooding Iran with weapons, Reagan publicly asked USSR to stop, they wouldnt. (typical cold war battles)

    Note: Because at the time USSR had power to destroy USiA and stopping them was the mission and Iraq not losing to Iran who was flooded with USSR weapons was mission one.

  • @55ella2007k Maybe we should have just let Iran take Iraq who was being flooded with arms from USSR in 1982?, damn that makes sense. In case you missed it at the time Iran was our hated enemy and it was cold war?

    Heck worse than that USA supported Stalin to beat Nazis with massive amounts of equipment, so what! U have any reality of foreign policy or how history works?

  • @55ella2007k Funny you believe the USA should have let Iran take Iraq in 1982 with USSR arms, how funny. That would have been a great foreign policy decision in height of cold war. Sounds like something Obama would do though.

  • @55ella2007k Then In 1983, Rumsfeld, then a private citizen, traveled to Baghdad to meet with the Iraqi dictator. Rummy told Saddam that the USA was pissed (Reagan) with the use of chemical weapons. Then Reagan decided neither Iran or Iraq should win so we sent weapons to Iran also, go figure. Pres Reagan made sure it was a stalemate, best decision

  • @MissingGWdotcom :  Yes, but don't forget,that this stalemate ended up costing the lives of over 1 million civilians, and you call this a good decision? Doesn't this type of stalemate, actually prolong war and suffering on all sides, while furthering the arms industry world wide, regardless of the outcome?

  • @55ella2007k Of course, the USA did not want war between IRAN and IRAQ at the height of the cold war, and if they only had your magic wand I am sure they could have stopped it, but no they had to deal with reality darn it.

  • @55ella2007k So IRAN taking Iraq in the cold war makes perfect sense to you to let it happen in the height of the cold war? Well thankfully not even our DEM leaders at the time were that dumb.

  • @55ella2007k The real question is after Iraq 1 why did countries like france, Germany, Russia, and China continue to support Iraq legaly and illegaly? We did they support them after Iran Iraq war, the USA didn't.

    The problem is you see foreign policy in a black and white idealisitc way. Shame is world does not work that way.

  • @MissingGWdotcom : for the same reason, that the US continues to support its own economic interests, including in Iraq , via energy contracts conducted by a Korean firm. Actually, the Russian and the Chinese, just like the US, operate in both countries...albeit under economic cover....

    I don't see foreign policy in black and white at all, quite the contrary, which is why I try to point out its inherent contradictions...:)

  • @55ella2007k sure our government looks out for our interest as we have no magic wand or money tree for unlimited resources, go figure. Sure Iraq has given the USA prefered business status, that is how it works unlike colonies of the past. They USA builds strong business partners like Germany, Europe, Japan, Iraq, etc. But I know it is just so terrible what has happen to Germany and Japan.

  • @55ella2007k Of course it is a win win, Iraq has resources and needs things, we build and provide things. Oh and good news they are democratic and no longer a state sponsor of terror. I took 12 years to isolate Iraq from the world community and the sad news is if Saddam would have not hindered inspectors he would still be around to kill his own, threaten his neigbors and fund terror and youd be happy, that is sad.

  • @55ella2007k You do not see things black and white funny you have a big judgment on USA arming Saddam without even considering the circumstances. lolol. This is what they call foolish.

  • @55ella2007k Really what did Bush and cheney do wrong, I know you feel they did something wrong but maybe it is more than a feeling and you can actualy articulate it?

    Oh the good old days - America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

  • @MissingGWdotcom : For one thing, they attacked a country, namely Iraq, which had zero to do with 9/11 , in order to further their own financial interests in the Middle East. The entire war was sold to the American public based on lies, all of which have been proven to be lies, based on manufactured 'evidence'. A war of a aggression of this sort, is the ultimate war crime, as stated during the Nuremberg Tribunals. So, yes, I can articulate it. >>>

  • @55ella2007k Really who said 9-11 had anything to do with Saddam. Funny the only one that say that are the nuts against the war so weird. Bush did not say it. I can send you the video link President George Bush said We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."

  • @55ella2007k Then there was Hillary Clinton stating in October of 2002 Saddam has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

    Funny no one ever claimed Saddam had anything to do with 9-11

  • @55ella2007k No Saddam had nothing to do with 911, but he did hinder inspectors for 12 years, was a state sponsor of terror with billions, funded Palestine bombers that killed American kids, he hid Al ZAR from Jordans, shot at our pilots for 12 years, killed 300,000 of his own, and gassed his neighbors, shot 1500 kurds girls in the desert at a time in the head with AKs, glad we got the killer

  • @55ella2007k Funny I guess you missed 15 un resolutions saying - "Iraq must cooperate fully with UN and IAEA inspectors and allow immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access Not sure what immediate means to you but to me it means 11 years too long. Oh and 2 of these were passed under Bush.

    Did you also miss the Iraq liberation bill passed by Clinron making it law Saddam was to be replaced?

  • @55ella2007k Clinton passed the Iraq Liberation Act (Dec 16 1998 The Act found that Iraq had between 1980 and 1998 (1) committed various and significant violations of International Law, (2) had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed to following the Gulf War and (3) further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support "regime change."

  • @55ella2007k The Iraq Liberation Act was passed 360-38 (1998) in the U.S. House of Representatives then Clinton bombed Iraq for 4 days.

    Did you not agree with Edwards? America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 2002

  • @55ella2007k did you not agree with Nancy? I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons." 2002 Nancy Pelosi

    I did and still do

  • @55ella2007k This is telling [I]t is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons. We might have destroyed them in '98. We tried to, but we sure as heck didn't know" Bill Clinton, July 2003:

    Now these jelly fish like Obama and Biden are taking credit for Iraq, lolol full circle.

  • >>> continued: you need to remember, that as result of all these lies, over 5,000 US service members have lost their lives, and this is not counting the wounded and those with PTSD, their lives in ruin, based on these lies. Furthermore, well over 500,000 Iraqis have been killed, with 4 million refugees, as a result of a war which was based on lies. So, yes, I regard this as a war crime, instigated by Bush/Cheney + most Democrat Reps fully complicit in this.

  • @55ella2007k good news Saddam is no longer a state sponsor of terror funding groups like Hamas, shooting 1500 Kurds girls at a time, hanging Shiites daily in Freedom Square, shooting at USA pilots for 12 years, threatening his neighbors and Israel and France, Germany, Russia, and China are no longer doing illegal businesses with him.

  • @MissingGWdotcom : it may come as huge surprise to you, but Saddam was shooting at his neighbors at the behest of the US government. We supplied him with the weapons, and when he went after the Shiites, the US government abandoned the Shiites, despite solemn promises to the contrary. Saddam, a tyrant to be sure, was funded by the US prior to the Gulf war. Please look it up. These are the facts. The geo political strategy in this region is much, much more complicated than this.

  • @55ella2007k LOLOL ok you ignore history, Reagan armed Saddam because the USSR was arming Iran in the height of the cold war. There was no way the USA was going to let Iran take Iraq in the height of the cold war and everyone agreed including DEMS, funny there was no big debate in supporting Iraq back then because of a little thing called reality.

  • @55ella2007k Yes we did pull out and could not protect the Shiites after iraq 1, the world community said sanctions would work and too pull back. Personaly I thought it was a mistake but we gave the UN and the world community a chance to prove they could do it and they failed, instead they cheated, sweet.

  • @55ella2007k You need to look it up dear, oh and in the end we armed Iran and Iraq because we wanted neither to win. We did not arm Saddam after that but the French, Russians and Chinesse sure did, look it up. Oh who is that oh the same people the left nuts call the "rest of the world".

  • @55ella2007k So you think the USA should have let Iran take Iraq with USSR arms in the height of the cold war? Good news even the liberal dems of the time did not agree with you.

    Look if you have a magic wand for perfect foriegn policy please wave it ASAP!

  • @55ella2007k The sad thing is sanctions could really work if the entire world was serious about it and did not cheat.

    Saddam had 12 years, 11 years years to long and GW got this killer, thank you thank you thank you!

  • @MissingGWdotcom : ok, come on now...the sanctions didn't result in undermining the regime there. It essentially only hurt the people, regular families, and thousands of innocent children were denied essential medical supplies. Saddam was no different than Cheney, in this regard, and Madeline Albright went along with the lies, too. Do you even see, where I'm coming from here? This is not an issue of Repubs vs Dems, it's the overall fucked up policy, which will only foster more mayhem....

  • @55ella2007k test

  • @55ella2007k LOLOL, ok lets just pass sanctions for no reason, lets not even have it as an option I guess what we need to just move right on to war. Funny the repressed do not want their governments to be successful. Believe it or not people will sacrifice for freedom, I know that is hard to believe. The sad fact is Iran gas was cut off, their ships not allowed in ports and cut off from the banks it may work without a war.

  • @55ella2007k No I am ok getting rid of Saddam, personaly I wish we had a magic wand to get them all. He had 12 years but Saddam refused. I can send you to a great article from the herald. On what Saddam was up to before war. They talked to 100s in the Iraq military.

  • @55ella2007k Saddam told his commanders there was no WMD in DEC 2003 - they were shocked and destroyed, then Saddam told them there was deterrence by doubt" policy to keep people from finding out. Saddam had no intention of allowing inspectors to do their job, he had a deterrence of doubt program, he thought the USA would never attack and even thought France would end sanctions as they were Saddam biggest trading partner, Saddam mis calculated

  • @MissingGWdotcom : Of course, he miscalculated, just as Bush/Cheney miscalculated. As you might remember, this little military adventure was supposed to be over within a few weeks, with Bush declaring, on that aircraft carrier: mission accomplished! Well seven years later and hundreds of thousands dead, we're still there. Brilliant fucking strategy!  Not to mention, the trillion dollars spent on this war alone. Oh, but now the country is in debt. Think about this.

  • Funny, after Iraq 1 all the experts said for 12 years good thing we did not go into Baghdad as they all claimed 10,000 USA soldiers would all be lost. Not sure what kool aid you were drinking but many did not think the war would last long which it didnt but most said many more would die which thankfully did not happen.

  • @MissingGWdotcom : Well, at this point, 6,000 US soldiers are dead, and many more wounded, and you maintain " thankfully, this did not happen?"

    Don't you realize, that this precisely what happened, because it layed the groundwork for Gulf War 2? How much more dense can you get?

  • @55ella2007k Yes beleive it or not the experts put the loses at much higher for 12 years before Iraq, I know this is a big surprise to you but not the people we voted for supporting Saddam's removel, like Kerry. "If you want to leave Saddam in power with WMDs and nuclear weapons, then don't vote for me." John F. Kerry, New Hampshire Primary

  • @55ella2007k But we know this is not good enough for your idealistic black and white view of things as it was not perfect. Hay when you going to wave that magic wand?

    Hay good news Saddam is no longer a state sponsor of terror or shooting 1500 kurds girls at a time in the head with AK47s. How dense are you?

  • @55ella2007k We also watched the Russians lose 17,000 troops in Afghanistan and 15,000 in Chechnya. Personally I expected 15,000 lost between Iraq and Afghanistan so I thank President Bush everyday that did not occur. Kerry knew this when he said "If you want to leave Saddam in power with WMDs and nuclear weapons, then don't vote for me." John F. Kerry, New Hampshire Primary

  • @55ella2007k Maybe if they had you magic wand they could have waved it and had a perfect war?

    My cousin was on that aircraft carrier and she liked the sign they put it up and their mission was over, she laughs at what the left turns it in to, some rallying cry with no facts..

  • @MissingGWdotcom : Well, of course, she like the sign, because her unit fulfilled their initial duty. I'm not trashing the soldiers. They are merely pawns. I suggest you read PACKING INFERNO by Tyler Beaudreau, a US Marine.

  • @55ella2007k No she is not a dumb fool as you portray, she liked the sign because their mission was over and they were proud of what they did. How dare you discount the very people fighting for your freedom to be a idealistic fool. Great a book to read, how about I just talk to my cousin that has been to Iraq 3 times and Afghan twice, oh and someone that would laugh at your naivety.

  • @55ella2007k Please do tell what is the big revalation you got from the book, war is bad?

    Good news Saddam is no longer a state sponsor of terror or killing 1500 Kurd girls at one time. Oh an no longer shooting at our piliots or blowing off UN inspectors

  • @55ella2007k Funny I was sitting on a plane with a young man coming back from Iraq, he told me he HATED (his words) people like you that do not support him and his buddies. Hay good news Saddam is no longer a state sponsor of terror in the mid east funding groups like Hamas and in today's world that is priceless. We have two state sponsors of terror left in the ME I am sure will be cleaned up once Obama is gone.

  • @55ella2007k Right over 8 years the Iraq war cost each USA citizen $16 a month, sounds like a deal to me to end 50 years of killing, terror, hijacking, kidnappings, wars, raids, etc. Oh and we now have our first democracy in Iraq, bonus hour!

  • @MissingGWdotcom:: I disagree, because there is not even a resemblance of democracy in Iraq at this point. It is simply a US-sponsored puppet government, just like many others. The Europeans are equally complicit, by the way, and Russia is owned by criminal elite at this point, thanks to the 'free market' bs, which was imposed on them, no holds barred.

  • @55ella2007k Not a democracy in Iraq, that is funny because it is not perfect it does not exist, well I am not surprised with that black and white idealisitc mind of yours, it all makes sense. Is there not anything you see the grays understanding the good and bad also happens? Funny the process is working right now after the election those damn iraqis

  • @55ella2007k Funny those evil countries the USA destroyed with their evil foriegn policy like Germany and Japan are thriving and we benifit, go figure. USA builds want stable business partners that are stable and care for their people like Japan and Germany today, our fathers hated enemies remember?

    Tell me what country has done more for world freedom and econmic success than the USA? Cant wait for this answer, lolol

  • @MissingGWdotcom : World 'Freedom' and economic success? Don't make me laugh ! The two do not exactly go hand in hand, but if you believe in this propaganda, it's ok with me. Have at it ! :)

  • @55ella2007k Oh sure you are going to laugh because for you it has to be perfect or it sucks, guess what I have an amazing life, all the peole around have an amazing life, I travel the world and see others with an amazing life. Funny the three biggest ecomies are USA, Japan and Germany, oh look they are free because of the terrible USA. But I know your magic wand could do oh so much better, LMAO.

  • @55ella2007k Maybe the USA should act like France or the USSR? 1) give best land to fellow Frenchman 2) Form a monopoly on all their resources 3) provide no infrastructure in return not even schools, that way the local population has nothing to stop you with. 4) Pass a law that French schoolbooks have to put a nice spin on French colonel history.

    sorry the evil USA does not do these things as we want strong partners not weak ones.

  • @MissingGWdotcom :: Ahhh! So France and the Russians have no infra-stucture and they monopolize everything in sight! Great! Isn't this precisely what the US is doing? But I liked point 4) the best: how about changing the textbooks in Texas to denigrate the achievements of the civil rights movement, while proclaiming Alan Greenspan and the Moral Majority as the unseen heros? Your arguments make me laugh... quite frankly, because they contain so many hypocritical statements :)

  • @55ella2007k No sorry you do not read, when these countries take a colony the rape it not building up the infrastucture, get it? I guess the USA could do this. Like the riots in just 2005 in the Ivory coast where the frence steal the coca and provide no resources in return. Oh then they pass a law stating the history books have to put a good spin on it, guess the terribleUSA could do this?

  • @55ella2007k no the USA does not monopolize things, come on, now do we try to build strong democratic countries that become strong business partenrs and allies, yes. Is it perfect, lololol never, is it terrible as you seem to beleive, not even close. Right or we can write the book with a completely progressive spin, hay you see Obama gov web site where he rewrites history on every subject?

  • @55ella2007k Hay you see Obama organization making videos brainwashing our kids. The videos are just about talking to your dumb parents about hope and change and how the just dont get it. Or you see you can be an intern in your high school for organizing for America but you have to read several socialist books first to get the positiion?

  • @55ella2007k Here is Good book on the complete failings of liberals - Peter Schweizer is the author of Makers and Takers: Why Conservatives Work Harder, Feel Happier, Have Closer Families, Take Fewer Drugs, Give More Generously, Value Honesty More, Are Less Materialistic and Envious, Whine Less ... And Even Hug Their Children More Than Liberals The books studies are mostly based on studies from liberal universities.

  • @55ella2007k Kerry NOW says said Mid East is a nuisance, thats how DEMs NOW view it, Dems want to go back to Clintons policies of ignoring the mid east, Dems just want to dump 50 years of mid east BS on the next generation. lolol,

  • @MissingGWdotcom : Wrong again. Because the DEMS, under Clinton, actually sided with the laizze affaire economic policies started by Reagan. They sided with it, in fact. They followed the Brzezinski Model, which was also favored by the Republicans, so there is very little difference there. So, yes, there was a consensus...as you mentioned, but this is a consensus which I never agreed with from the get go. So, this is NOT a partisan issue for me at all.

  • @55ella2007k Funny under Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, GW the GNP increase $12 trillion dollar per year! Now under Obama GNP has dropped $1 trillion, the first drop in 30 years! Under Obama the debt to GNP will increase 50% higher than all those presidents by next year to over 110% of GNP vs DEBT from 60%! You can raise debt slowly if you increase GNP, under GW it increase $3 trillion. But gov can outpace the private economy or we go broke.

  • @55ella2007k Look you have it all figured out not just economics but foreign policy too wow and it is all based on silly idealism but I know it is easy when you have a magic wand.

    Funny when I was a kid the GNP was $2 trillion, we were all poor, hell if mom gave me and my sisters a quarter for the candy story we were blessed.

  • @55ella2007k OK so here is the score you hate the awful USA foriegn policy even though it has made us a super power and freed 100s of millions.

    You hate our economy dispite it being 4x bigger than the next closets one Japan oh that other country our evil foriegn policy destroyed.

    Me I will take them as I dont beleive in your little magic wand.

  • @MissingGWdotcom : It's ok. You don't have to believe me. At this point, the US is no longer a super power, and on its way out. Our foreign debt is financed by Japan and China and many others. I don't believe Americans or America is evil. But I also reject your notion of American exceptionalism. This nation is very young + and empires come and go throughout the course of history. I know, that your motivations are well meant, but I also know, that I cannot agree. Let's leave it at that.

  • @55ella2007k It is not a super power, that is funny we spend more on just military research than the next 25 countries combined. Oh and since no other country comes close to a $13 trillion GNP our militray budget dwarfs everyone including Russia and China, but I know all that just happened despite our stupidity. america is the greatest country ever but you would hate to admit it freeing 100s of millions of people, you just cant see that gray can you?

  • @55ella2007k You would have made a good libertarian with me 25 years ago when we were dealing with years of government screw-ups. Lets remember Kennedy, Kennedy bros, King, Cuba, Vietnam, Iran hostages, cold war, Iran contra, Watergate, 18% interest rates, gas shortages, civil rights, Israel attacked, OPEC, Arafats weekly terrorism, on and on and on. Guess what we survivide all that without your magic wand making it perfect.

  • @55ella2007k Look idealism is nice right as you are never wrong as long as you do not mudy it up with reality.

    The great thing is idealism is 100% right if we had a magic wand, money tree and no enemies, NOTE WE DONT!

  • @55ella2007k OH and lets remember Taliban, AQ, Hezbollah, Hamas, Iran, Syria and NK all thrived under Clinton, thanks DEMS and now it is going to happen again and REPS will have to clean up the DEM mess again

  • @MissingGWdotcom: US foreign policy is essentially bi-partisan...and the DEMS are equally as bad, as the Republicans in this regard. I am not in agreement with either party on that score, and never have been. LBJ escalated the war in Vietnam, a DEM no less, and for what? The Domino theory, which turned out to be a complete farce? So, yes, you are right to critique the DEMS, but remember, it's all bi-partisan, and in my view, ALL of these policies are deeply flawed.

  • @55ella2007k Good new Vietnam was a cold war battle we lost but news flash we won the COLD WAR! and 28 East European countries are free, I know that terrible USA. The domino theory wrong, that is funny check again we WON!. The USSR was stopped from stealing reasources around the world.

  • Comment removed

  • @55ella2007k Guess what before WW2 few countries were democracies but today over 60% of the countries are because of the terrible USA foriegn policy.

    I am sure all these policies are flawed to that black and white idealisitc mind of yours because you have a magic wand you know.

  • @55ella2007k Look you make perfect sense if we had a money tree, magic wand and no enemies, but since we dont maybe we have to deal with reality? Or we do your grand policy and stick our head in the sand. LOLOL

  • @55ella2007k Oh and guess what before WW2 few countries were democracies but today 60% are because of that terrible USA foreign policy. Now are all democracies perfect before you discount them, no but millions more are freer today because of the greatest country on earth, the USA!

  • @55ella2007k Funny my guess is you dig code pink? Code Pink actually went to Afghanistan to talk to women, the Afghan women told them they had no clue of the reality in their country now all the sudden Code Pink wants no time line in Afghan, lib nuts get a lesson in reality too bad it took a decade. Code Pink took 1 trip to Afghan and now changed their stupid tune.

  • @55ella2007k But I know as long as you are safe and we just love evil around the world it will be ok fine, I know and you have AAAA batteries for that magic wand of yours to.

    What no more comments Saddam? I guess it is a bit more complex that you understand?

  • @55ella2007k Even Saddams own commanders thought they had WMD, remember Saddam saying he would use gas if American troop entered "ring of fire", Saddam said he would gas Israel remember all gas masks? Only one lying was Saddam. Hans Blix, who said in 2003 after the war he believed (but did not know for sure and after the war) that Iraq had destroyed most of its weapons of mass destruction years before, but kept up the appearance that he had them to deter a military attack from Iran.

  • @55ella2007k Saddam filled mass gravesin the Iraqi desert with 1500 Kurd girls who were shoot in the mud wearing their best clothes because they were told they were going to be relocated. Many were sisters, shot in the mud on a raining day in the head with an AK47. Thank you GW. Wish we had a magic wand to get them all but we got this one.

  • @55ella2007k Really, your viewers are smart,

    Hay look the progressive far left nuts make perfect sense if we had a magic wand, money tree and no enemies.

    I do support mod liberal dems like Kennedy, dont ask what your country can do for you but what you can do for it, what happen to this?

  • @MissingGWdotcom : true, but you also have to remember that Kennedy wasn't exactly a saint. The entire notion  "don't ask what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country' is entirely abstract, since a country is comprised of individual citizens, which make up the country in the first place. So, it's always a give and take, and a very simplistic, patriotic slogan, via Kennedy. The only thing I'm grateful for, is that Kennedy had enough sense to negotiate with Russia..

  • >>> continued: had enough sense to negotiate with Russia, not acting on impulse, because we were literally 1 day away from all an all out nuclear war, as the recently released, and previously classified documents, have shown. None of us would be here today, on the internet, nor elsewhere, if Kennedy had over-reacted at that point. And he wasn't a softy in terms of national security. Thank goodness, he and his counterpart in Russia, had enough sense left, to know what was at stake.

  • Could you imagine if Pres Bush would have...........claimed he is now "agnostic" about raising taxes on those making less than $250,000 despite all those promises, 111 dems voted for Iraq war but has to bribe his own party to pass healthcare, calling police stupid and racist, despite being commander and chief he cant pronounce the word corpse man correctly,

  • refuses to show long form birth certificate as we cant build a shrine to him without it, claims your healthcare premiums will go down 3000% because of him which means the insurance company will be paying each of us about $125,000 this year wow were in!, calling docs greedy hacks doing procedures just to make money, first president not meet with Dali Lama then when he finally does it is low key as the Dali Lama is led out with the trash

  • is cool with buds at Goldman Sachs and Chase making $17 million and $9 million bonuses but damn the rest of you greedy Nazis, cut funding to a group tracking Iran human rights, claims bin laden will never be caught so do not worry your little heads about reading him his Miranda rights, cancels missile defense getting nothing in return and not even talking about it to our allies involved, science CZAR wanting to sterilize people to control population,

  • kills the shuttle replacement and moon exploration, after hours working on his final four picks Obama misspells Syracuse as he forgets that silent r, cant spell ACORN all the sudden while having no time for an investigation into things like advising on child prostitution rings, tries to personally get Chicago the Olympics blowing that, flying air force 1 over NYC for pics telling no one, blocks congresss investigation into Fort Hood shooter,

  • Lockerbie bomber claims on flight home Obama got him released and set his conditions (oh and that dude that was suppose to die a year ago), says powerful words like wee-weed, made a stupid special Olympic bowling comment, bribing labor unions with a $90 billion tax break so they can keep their evil private healthcare, Las Vegas flip flop, NY terror trial costing over $200 million in just security, cant answer questions on health care plan despite the claim things would be read line by line

  • cuts a news organization off from interviewing Czars as other news organizations protest, claiming all over he talk shows GW did not help him in afghan but GW passed on to him new details plans on afghan that Obama used then had the nerve to asks GW not to tell anyone which he honorably does, NK and Cuba have kidnapped USA citizens, 9 months later 3 hikers still held captive in Iran as Obama ignores it, attacks the Cham of Commerce but they can now fight back with the latest Supreme Court ruling

  • Frum says that the health care bill does not stray far from what Republicans were advocating in the 90s. If this is true, why was VP Biden proclaiming what a big f-----ing deal this is?

    It seems that if the Democrats are this pleased about passing a bill which so closely resembles the Republican policies of the 90s, then the implication is that the Republicans were right back then? Is that possible? I would assume you would say no, but what else is one to make of this? Thanks.

  • Comment removed

  • FIX the GOP by throwing OUT the Statist Progressive NeoCons!

    STOP Empire Building & Foreign Intervention with 700+ US military bases OCCUPYING almost EVERY nation PRODUCING hatred & jihad resistance!

    END bribes/bombs Manipulation! Trade, NOT Isolationism!

    STOP Fascist Crony Corporatism, Illegal Immigration & Marxist Redistributionism.

    Return to Constitutionally limited Gov't, Individual Liberty & Responsibility, Sound Money, FREE competition between FREE States & among FREE people.

  • When things get too mendacious for David Frum there is some fuckin' lyin' goin' ON!!!

    (You can keep him. We don't want him back lol)

  • @TheElMoIsEviL : yeah...kind of tells you were the political barometer has landed...and yes, it is frightening.

  • I saw this David Frum news, getting fired ect. The Right's anger about Healthcare with all the lies misconception, half truths would be Saturday Night Live funny if it wasn't for real that people have actually bought into the bag of lies that Glen Beck, Limbaugh and their ilk has been successfully peddling to the newly created peasant class that they "Conservative Talking heads" have assisted their Money masters in creating.

  • Good to see you having a real laugh...

  • I'll take radical left over radical right any day. But the main point is well said, little if any tangible difference between the two parties, both corporate dominated.

  • The health care legislation is the greatest redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor and middle classes of any legislation passed since the 1960s. The health care bill is a major liberal accomplishment, even if it is imperfect, and gives us a foothold on universal coverage from which we can build and expand. It's only a matter of time before we have a public option, and eventually there is a good chance we can convert to a single payer system. This was just the first necessary step.

  • Frum rightly says, "the liberal bloc in the Democratic Party of today is bigger than" it has ever been. Now is not the time to destroy the Democratic Party. Now is the time to keep working within it to improve it. We have a lot of good people in the Democratic Party, and far fewer conservatives than ever before. Maybe in another 10 or 20 years we will have a real progressive party. Of course, we have to not undermine it by voting 3rd party or staying home.

  • I wish the Dems were half as obstructionist as the G.O.P. is today. We might not have Alito and Roberts on the court, 2 wars, and huge deficits thanks to tax-cuts for the richest of the rich.

    They should've rammed through single-payer via reconciliation. The country would've paid them back handsomely in the long run. FDR's actions secured Democratic dominance for 40 years or so (I just made a vid about FDR and Obama as well).

  • Binhthanhvo,

    All good points. Especially about how the public is still rewarding the Democrats for Social Security and the other major liberal achievements. This new health care law will be exactly the same way. I realize a few progressives don't like some aspects of it, but it's a major achievement and the public will not forget who gave it to them -- assuming we can make it through the initial waves of massive rightwing resistence.

  • @Z200a This bill has nothing in common with Social Security. It's a bailout for the insurance industry, who created the problems in the first place. You should take a look at my video where I explain why this bill will hurt the Dems in the long run.

  • That's what republicans do. When someone in their party gets out of line, they cut off their money and career!! And they call democrats "communists"? . True hypocrites...

  • That's what democrates do. When someone in their party gets out of line, they cut off their money and career!! And they call republicans "communists"? . True hypocrites...

  • Great video

  • other famous Jews that people on youtube repeat talking points Murray Rothbard, Ludwig Von Mises, and Milton Friedman. next someone has to expose Mark Levin and Michael "Weiner" Savage.

    people will learn that socialism is the only way, and FREE-DUMB is a scam which always has to be corrected by government.

  • You are definetly twisted lol 1 in 1000

  • Thanks Ella...Frum's piece lays open the rotting corpse of the Republican Party...Their hyperboles and fear mongering have become so extreme they have polluted their Corporate Big Business ideologies to such a point that only the most ignorant and stubborn of their ranks refuse to recognize the treachery.

  • *****

  • all of the Jews are masters at creating talking points, but only another Jew can see through their BS. AEI, PNAC, CATO, etc. are all run by Jews. every founder and major contributor of Liberatarianism is also Jewish. people can't see through the BS. glad a Jew became pissed enough to point out their scam of Free-Dumb and other talking points.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more