@AtanvarnoALDA The word "worse" and "Amelia Brightman" don't match well. So how about a far fairer "not quite as spectacular" or "more tranquil" or "not quite as angelic"
There is an interesting thing here. Sarah's most angelic singing is mostly based on the very few and selective upharmonic components of her voice, giving the famouse crystal clear feeling - IF we hear it at all!
Because if there are further upharmonics present (thanks to distortion, or another voice singing the same thing), those can hide her voice from our hearing! So, the musical environment controls which voice is "better". Sometimes the more colorful voice of Amelia's.
Nice!
It's the first time I see Amelia in motion. Her looks are really better than Sarah's exactly as much as her singing is worse. :)
AtanvarnoALDA 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@AtanvarnoALDA
Well, Sarah's voice is exceptional. But I think Amelia's voice and talent has a great potential too. Hope she will do it!
Kylie2011DcsabaS 1 month ago
@Kylie2011DcsabaS
Hope so, too. We (and by that I mean both us fans _and_ Amelia) deserve a whole album by her. Solo, without Gregorian.
AtanvarnoALDA 1 month ago
@AtanvarnoALDA The word "worse" and "Amelia Brightman" don't match well. So how about a far fairer "not quite as spectacular" or "more tranquil" or "not quite as angelic"
PoetOfTheSpheres 1 month ago 2
@PoetOfTheSpheres
There is an interesting thing here. Sarah's most angelic singing is mostly based on the very few and selective upharmonic components of her voice, giving the famouse crystal clear feeling - IF we hear it at all!
Because if there are further upharmonics present (thanks to distortion, or another voice singing the same thing), those can hide her voice from our hearing! So, the musical environment controls which voice is "better". Sometimes the more colorful voice of Amelia's.
Kylie2011DcsabaS 1 month ago
@PoetOfTheSpheres
Correction wholeheartedly accepted! :)
AtanvarnoALDA 1 month ago