Ultimate irony: A judge Rick Santorum and GW Bush likely thought would be a "keeper of the flame," so to speak, was the one who dealt the crushing blow to this idiocy. Well-played, judge. Golf claps for science all around!
7:22 Po' baby- still angry that he didn't get his way. His entire counter-argument to the judge's decision is "he's a jackass and clown, and even though he went to law school and I didn't, he doesn't know the law, and I don't like him."
Honestly. A grown man- whining. It's pretty fucking pathetic.
What I find really odd is that when people continue to ask "Why are we here?" and when science explains it through genetics, physics, cosmology, biology etc, they say, "Ok, you explained how... but why?" What is this constant need for meaning? Is it so scary that there might not be a "reason" why we are here, we are simply just here through evolution, the Big Bang etc.
Because people... probably due to the evils they can conceive... don't have enough faith in themselves to produce a meaning for their own existence. They feel they need a higher force to do it, rather than be told that they can work for the betterment of the future and the generations that will continue to dwell.
Interesting, too- something as rigid as religion stands no chance in evolving into something that can serve people better than science.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE COURT REJECTED THE THEORY not because of it has no scientific merits but because the court felt it would open a back door for creationism to come in which the court believes violates separation of church and state. There's no violation. No one's being forced to believe in God. Both sides and their evidence and arguments ought to be presented. Both sides pay taxes for public school education.
superb, well put together. Thank you Nova! What this does show is that Buckingham and a few other folks in Dover, are clearly proof that the evolutionary process does not guarantee a full proof system of species progression, indeed compared to our ape cousins it is clear that there are exceptions to the rule and indeed in some cases have taken a couple of steps backwards.
Did anyone notice the muslim girl at 6:58? I wonder how much shit she has to take from the other fundamentalists in the school for not believing in their god
SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASSES DO need to teach SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCES that CONTRADICT the THEORY of evolution: There are literally THOUSANDS of scientific facts that do not support evolutional theory - especially in cosmology, chemistry, biology, paleontology, and mathematical language, ETC. The Mention of the WORDS; intelligent design, creator, supernatural, God, etc. DO NOT NEED. TO BE MENTIONED AT ALL in order to present the MULTITUDE of scientific FACTS that are NOT in ALIGNMENT with evolutional T
@Nucl3arTeacup me too! the strategy of people like @TheWayandWordofLife is pretty obvious though. if i say without anything to back me up that there are evidence against evolution, then maybe some dumb people will think "some people say it's true, some don't so it's 50-50 who's right". much like holocaust deniers.
Awww, the poor creationists are mad that the ruling didn't go their way and they won't be able promote ignorance at the taxpayers' expense. Too bad, so sad.
I should clarify from my previous post in that when the error is in the sperm or egg cell, it won't affect your body, but that of your offspring's body.
It does puzzle me why people just don't believe in evolution, what is it about evolution that makes it unbelieveable?
@adam3141 Errors don't occur every time. If this were true, your body would be quickly consumed by cancer or you would have no cells (since errant cells will either die by themselves (programmed cell death) or the immune system will kill them). See telomeres, apoptosis and dna replication in general.
@swagger93 Swagger - I studied this - I work in the field. Errors do occur and it is fact. Your cells have to copy 3 billion base pairs every time a cell divides and while some of this can be corrected, sometimes they wont be. Most of the time the error will be in something called an intron - look it up. This means it will have no effect on the cell. Sometimes it will be in an exon and because of the way a proteins are made - it may also have no effect. See synonymous mutation.
Why do humans have DNA, as well as cats, dogs, fungi, trees and bacteria and furthermore, why are most of my genes more than 99% identical to that of a mouse.
Everytime a cell gets copied in your body, there are errors in that new copy of DNA. If this error happens to be in a sperm or egg cell then it can affect the way a gene behaves in your body (assuming the error was in a gene) and this effect can be good or bad. Natural Selection is a process that weeds out the bad effects.
A soul, a spirit, an ethereal substance. Call it what you will. I believe our bodies are the result of evolution and our soul is the work of our creator and when we die, our bodies decompose and our soul lives on.
Why can't people accept evolution theory? Have these people thought through it rationally in their minds. God gave us free-thinking minds to discover the world in all of its glory.
I watched bits and pieces of this - I have yet to watch it all... What a waste of money the trial was, a million dollars that could have gone to improving the school rather than being wasted by a group of short sighted people.
Evolution is a fact of life, and it makes sense from a scientific point of view. I believe in a God, a creator if you will and I also believe in a soul.
What? you say - How can I believe in both Evolution and a Soul.
It would actually be really funny if the USA abandoned evolution because it would totally single them out and leave them all alone. These creationist idiots think that if they stop teaching evolution in America then that's it, all over. The rest of the civilized world will not stop teaching evolution regardless of what the states does.
@Brushles83 Please understand that not all of us US citizens are creationist fucktards... As you can see we can throw off the virus of religion and creationism.. but we have a lot of work to do...
@xn117 Don't listen to this moron troll. I wonder if he thinks it would be funny if countries had established churches? Oh wait, they do, but the United States is not one of them. England is. So are Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland and Norway. Aren't these liberal democracies with educated populations? DERP TROLL
Hmmm how do i put this? Ohh yeah judge Jones is a decent and honest man.
if you consider what background he had going to this trial, it took alot of guts to come out this strong on the side of reason!
As a european i could say Haha to all this bullshit but the world is changeing, countrys mean less and less and we need sane and rational ppl everywere so keep up the good fight!
That school board religious member was such a retard. Saying the judge doesn't know law. I love how religious people who never took science think they know science, never took law and think they know law
@BunsterByne Thumbs up - Pat Robertson is the biggest crook and liar of them all - well spotted - boy these people just keep shooting themsleves in the foot - I think we are seeing a new paradigm shift - the end of religion.
That Judge was an idiot!! God created the world in 6 days. Period.
Now please excuse me, I'm about to sell my daughter into slavery, give away all my possesions and maybe stone some homosexuals to death if I gots time.
"We were only trying to make the school system the best...". You think that he knows the road to hell is paved with good intentions?
As for the ex-cop, his tirade about the judge is simply - pathetic. Humbled because he lied in a federal trial? Not a chance. Jesus (and his ego) uber alles.
i thought this was going to boring at first but dammit this is a very addicting Nova show.. love it.. (I D) lost ahahah = no scientific evidence to prove it.
Thank you for posting this documentary. I love NOVA and this was very informative. It seems that opponents to evolution are not up to date on the many recent discoveries that only give weight to Darwin's theory. They act like Darwinian theory is dogmatic, yet it is they who are dogmatic in their strong willed resistance to a theory well supported by tons of scientific evidence. Can't evolution be the how and not the why? We can leave the why to God. More answers will be revealed in time.
You are very right in your view. There seems to be a commonality to a dogmatic attitude that sees all that oppose, or threaten, their postion, as dogmatic.
@xTSARBOMBAx: I don't think that is the case. Hatred, I think, is a much better explanation than ignorance. The DI has the wherewithal to keep abreast with science; what else does it have but to try to counter what science says? That they seem to be imminently unsuccessful at establishing themselves as science says a lot. This is further indicated on the reluctance to change when they are forced to "small the coffee". Behe still believes the flagellum and the immune system are irreducible.
Father and daughter never reconciled; Prophecy came true.
Luke 12:51. Suppose ye that I (Jesus) am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three....."
Ok, yea, and Im guessing you pulled that right out of your ass; most likely the same place all you other ideas come from. God, how much idiocy can you cram into a few hundred characters?
@theredrooter: A want to hear an atheist say that that is what he said (or thought) then, before I'll believe that you are doing anything more then spitting in the wind on that.
Ultimate irony: A judge Rick Santorum and GW Bush likely thought would be a "keeper of the flame," so to speak, was the one who dealt the crushing blow to this idiocy. Well-played, judge. Golf claps for science all around!
RadAntelope 2 months ago
7:22 Po' baby- still angry that he didn't get his way. His entire counter-argument to the judge's decision is "he's a jackass and clown, and even though he went to law school and I didn't, he doesn't know the law, and I don't like him."
Honestly. A grown man- whining. It's pretty fucking pathetic.
KajexFiredrake 2 months ago
What I find really odd is that when people continue to ask "Why are we here?" and when science explains it through genetics, physics, cosmology, biology etc, they say, "Ok, you explained how... but why?" What is this constant need for meaning? Is it so scary that there might not be a "reason" why we are here, we are simply just here through evolution, the Big Bang etc.
FlyingBandicoot 3 months ago
@FlyingBandicoot
Because people... probably due to the evils they can conceive... don't have enough faith in themselves to produce a meaning for their own existence. They feel they need a higher force to do it, rather than be told that they can work for the betterment of the future and the generations that will continue to dwell.
Interesting, too- something as rigid as religion stands no chance in evolving into something that can serve people better than science.
KajexFiredrake 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 3 months ago
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 3 months ago
Comment removed
Mogley52 3 months ago
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE COURT REJECTED THE THEORY not because of it has no scientific merits but because the court felt it would open a back door for creationism to come in which the court believes violates separation of church and state. There's no violation. No one's being forced to believe in God. Both sides and their evidence and arguments ought to be presented. Both sides pay taxes for public school education.
Mogley52 3 months ago
Thanks a bunch for posting this series of videos!
resistnzisfutl 6 months ago
7:21 - pure unadulterated butthurt.
CntrBrdr 6 months ago
deaththreads...only religious nutjobs can be such assholes
managarm1349 7 months ago
superb, well put together. Thank you Nova! What this does show is that Buckingham and a few other folks in Dover, are clearly proof that the evolutionary process does not guarantee a full proof system of species progression, indeed compared to our ape cousins it is clear that there are exceptions to the rule and indeed in some cases have taken a couple of steps backwards.
TheMarkyMarx 8 months ago
Evolution turned me into a newt !
... but I got better.
Xigano1 8 months ago
Thank you for posting this victory over stupidity.
makulass 9 months ago
Did anyone notice the muslim girl at 6:58? I wonder how much shit she has to take from the other fundamentalists in the school for not believing in their god
wohodude100 9 months ago
SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASSES DO need to teach SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCES that CONTRADICT the THEORY of evolution: There are literally THOUSANDS of scientific facts that do not support evolutional theory - especially in cosmology, chemistry, biology, paleontology, and mathematical language, ETC. The Mention of the WORDS; intelligent design, creator, supernatural, God, etc. DO NOT NEED. TO BE MENTIONED AT ALL in order to present the MULTITUDE of scientific FACTS that are NOT in ALIGNMENT with evolutional T
TheWayandWordofLife 10 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife oh? can you please present these. and why weren't this 'multitude of scientific facts' presented at the trial?
SebiSthlm 9 months ago
@SebiSthlm I would be amazed if he could produce even one of these alleged scientific "facts".
Nucl3arTeacup 9 months ago
@Nucl3arTeacup me too! the strategy of people like @TheWayandWordofLife is pretty obvious though. if i say without anything to back me up that there are evidence against evolution, then maybe some dumb people will think "some people say it's true, some don't so it's 50-50 who's right". much like holocaust deniers.
SebiSthlm 9 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife Unifying theory of biology. thats it. theres nothing else to be said
you cant argue it without looking like an idiot.
Birdo661 9 months ago
Awww, the poor creationists are mad that the ruling didn't go their way and they won't be able promote ignorance at the taxpayers' expense. Too bad, so sad.
greatbearstar451 10 months ago 2
Jesus rules the universe, accept it or not. on judgement day all mankind will see Jesus rules universe.
bass109 11 months ago
@bass109
Prove it.
NUTCASE71733 11 months ago
Lori is super, super hot.
ExaltedLeader 11 months ago
7:20
Mr. Buckingham: sore loser. I would love to hear him explain how the decision doesn't "jive" with the law.
FortressOfBalditude 11 months ago
I should clarify from my previous post in that when the error is in the sperm or egg cell, it won't affect your body, but that of your offspring's body.
It does puzzle me why people just don't believe in evolution, what is it about evolution that makes it unbelieveable?
adam3141 1 year ago
@adam3141 Errors don't occur every time. If this were true, your body would be quickly consumed by cancer or you would have no cells (since errant cells will either die by themselves (programmed cell death) or the immune system will kill them). See telomeres, apoptosis and dna replication in general.
swagger93 11 months ago
@swagger93 Swagger - I studied this - I work in the field. Errors do occur and it is fact. Your cells have to copy 3 billion base pairs every time a cell divides and while some of this can be corrected, sometimes they wont be. Most of the time the error will be in something called an intron - look it up. This means it will have no effect on the cell. Sometimes it will be in an exon and because of the way a proteins are made - it may also have no effect. See synonymous mutation.
adam3141 11 months ago
@adam3141 You appear correct, and I'll concede that point with an apology.
swagger93 11 months ago
Why do humans have DNA, as well as cats, dogs, fungi, trees and bacteria and furthermore, why are most of my genes more than 99% identical to that of a mouse.
Everytime a cell gets copied in your body, there are errors in that new copy of DNA. If this error happens to be in a sperm or egg cell then it can affect the way a gene behaves in your body (assuming the error was in a gene) and this effect can be good or bad. Natural Selection is a process that weeds out the bad effects.
adam3141 1 year ago
A soul, a spirit, an ethereal substance. Call it what you will. I believe our bodies are the result of evolution and our soul is the work of our creator and when we die, our bodies decompose and our soul lives on.
Why can't people accept evolution theory? Have these people thought through it rationally in their minds. God gave us free-thinking minds to discover the world in all of its glory.
adam3141 1 year ago
@adam3141
I agree. Galileo beleived that too.
NUTCASE71733 11 months ago
I watched bits and pieces of this - I have yet to watch it all... What a waste of money the trial was, a million dollars that could have gone to improving the school rather than being wasted by a group of short sighted people.
Evolution is a fact of life, and it makes sense from a scientific point of view. I believe in a God, a creator if you will and I also believe in a soul.
What? you say - How can I believe in both Evolution and a Soul.
adam3141 1 year ago
It would actually be really funny if the USA abandoned evolution because it would totally single them out and leave them all alone. These creationist idiots think that if they stop teaching evolution in America then that's it, all over. The rest of the civilized world will not stop teaching evolution regardless of what the states does.
Brushles83 1 year ago
@Brushles83 Please understand that not all of us US citizens are creationist fucktards... As you can see we can throw off the virus of religion and creationism.. but we have a lot of work to do...
Support us!
xn117 1 year ago
@xn117 Don't listen to this moron troll. I wonder if he thinks it would be funny if countries had established churches? Oh wait, they do, but the United States is not one of them. England is. So are Denmark, Finland, Greece, Iceland and Norway. Aren't these liberal democracies with educated populations? DERP TROLL
swagger93 11 months ago
@Brushles83 Troll.
swagger93 11 months ago
2 people have not evolved
n987 1 year ago
Hmmm how do i put this? Ohh yeah judge Jones is a decent and honest man.
if you consider what background he had going to this trial, it took alot of guts to come out this strong on the side of reason!
As a european i could say Haha to all this bullshit but the world is changeing, countrys mean less and less and we need sane and rational ppl everywere so keep up the good fight!
May god be less, peace and love from Sweden...:)
fnuttskallen 1 year ago
8:04 I don't get it, didn't both the plaintiffs and the defense ask the judge to decide if ID was science?
jessc1979 1 year ago
A very good insight into a very important trial and issue. Thank you for the upload, subscribed.
Nucl3arTeacup 1 year ago
garbage in garbage out. Well said.
sakdiesel86 1 year ago
That school board religious member was such a retard. Saying the judge doesn't know law. I love how religious people who never took science think they know science, never took law and think they know law
ke422azn 1 year ago 4
Pat Robertson: "Dont turn to god, you just rejected him from your city!"
Hold on there bucko, I thought ID WASNT religious.
BunsterByne 1 year ago 10
@BunsterByne
Well spotted!!!!!!
MilitantPeaceist 1 year ago
@BunsterByne Thumbs up - Pat Robertson is the biggest crook and liar of them all - well spotted - boy these people just keep shooting themsleves in the foot - I think we are seeing a new paradigm shift - the end of religion.
vohshkab 1 year ago
LMAO!
The sign at 09:49 says "EVOLUTION: UNSCIENTIFIC + UNTRUF!"
jxvwp 1 year ago
That Judge was an idiot!! God created the world in 6 days. Period.
Now please excuse me, I'm about to sell my daughter into slavery, give away all my possesions and maybe stone some homosexuals to death if I gots time.
Have a great day,
God Bless!
jazzyazz 1 year ago 2
@jazzyazz Fine. Just don't do it on the Sabbath.
JaguarEscarlata 1 year ago
Science for the win!
amorphousguy 1 year ago 3
you know. the epicness of the fail experienced by ID was obvious halfway through the judge's ruling...but he just kept going!
1stAres 1 year ago 3
"We were only trying to make the school system the best...". You think that he knows the road to hell is paved with good intentions?
As for the ex-cop, his tirade about the judge is simply - pathetic. Humbled because he lied in a federal trial? Not a chance. Jesus (and his ego) uber alles.
puncheex 1 year ago 2
I always find it amusing that RELIGIOUS people are the ones posting the death threats. The hypocrisy upon hypocrisy...in your own commandments.
You can't refute science with faith or fear. You can't destroy it either.
Darkmage1293 1 year ago 8
i thought this was going to boring at first but dammit this is a very addicting Nova show.. love it.. (I D) lost ahahah = no scientific evidence to prove it.
MrSTANG1362 2 years ago
Thank you for posting this documentary. I love NOVA and this was very informative. It seems that opponents to evolution are not up to date on the many recent discoveries that only give weight to Darwin's theory. They act like Darwinian theory is dogmatic, yet it is they who are dogmatic in their strong willed resistance to a theory well supported by tons of scientific evidence. Can't evolution be the how and not the why? We can leave the why to God. More answers will be revealed in time.
xTSARBOMBAx 2 years ago 20
Peace requires the acceptance of diversity
Dogma requires the acceptance of adversity.
You are very right in your view. There seems to be a commonality to a dogmatic attitude that sees all that oppose, or threaten, their postion, as dogmatic.
MilitantPeaceist 2 years ago
@xTSARBOMBAx: I don't think that is the case. Hatred, I think, is a much better explanation than ignorance. The DI has the wherewithal to keep abreast with science; what else does it have but to try to counter what science says? That they seem to be imminently unsuccessful at establishing themselves as science says a lot. This is further indicated on the reluctance to change when they are forced to "small the coffee". Behe still believes the flagellum and the immune system are irreducible.
puncheex 1 year ago 2
sore loosers :P
moh490234890238490 2 years ago 3
Father and daughter never reconciled; Prophecy came true.
Luke 12:51. Suppose ye that I (Jesus) am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three....."
12lipa 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
at 9/11 the americans , esecially the atheists said:' where was god".
Why the fuck would you ask about a god if you don't believe in him?
Are you monkies religious or what?
theredrooter 2 years ago
@theredrooter
Ok, yea, and Im guessing you pulled that right out of your ass; most likely the same place all you other ideas come from. God, how much idiocy can you cram into a few hundred characters?
sakar181 2 years ago
@theredrooter: A want to hear an atheist say that that is what he said (or thought) then, before I'll believe that you are doing anything more then spitting in the wind on that.
puncheex 1 year ago
Thanks for posting these videos. Each earned 5 stars and a favorite rating.
LarcheOsborne 2 years ago 12
I just stayed up way too late watching this. Concentrated awesomesauce. Thanks for the upload!
Xyless985 2 years ago 7
@Xyless985 aha I just did the exact same thing. Awesomesauce indeed!
kwazetastic 2 years ago 5
haha same
ilmaticxbboy 2 years ago
fan-freaking-tastic! :-)
sylence7 2 years ago 4
Thanks for uploading this!
dugges 2 years ago 15
My Pleasure
TY for enjoying! 8D
AtheistArchives 2 years ago 5