I feel they should have put Dennis Ritchie in place of Zuckerberg, but that aside, great video! It really is incredible just how far we've gotten in only a century's time.
at 1:08 she says "computers are just machines that eed to be told what to do by humans." Remember also that humans are just machines that need to be told what to do by computers.
-No they can put ~10 people (like they did) and non of the shoud be Zuckerberg.
It's like you are summerizig the history of film and show a porn star as an example. Yes, it's well know, but no cultural contibutions whatsoever and someone would argue, only devastation. It's the same thing with computer history, but through technological aspect.
It's such a shame to put Zuckerberg there and _not_ to inlcude Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson....in fact Zuckerberg shouldn't be there in the first place.
I found them even more segnificant then mr. Gates or mr.Jobs.
Facebook was not first social network. Facebook did not invent any new technology. Facebook is _propagated_ social network, nothing else.
Only someone who doesn't know anything about the history of computing can claim that Zuckerberg was important. Tesla and Edison played bigger role then Zuckerberg. The author of mp3 compression did more and it's the technology we use every day and no one knows his name.
@moveaxebx - I speculate there's one thing Zuckerberg did that deserves his baby face in this video. Donated some (maybe alot of) money to Computer History Museum.
@moveaxebx Yes Zuckerberg did not invent the first social network, his significance is that he created the first social network that became as widespread as it is, the one that people wanted to use. You seem to think that Edison is more important than Zuckerberg, but you fail to realize that he is exactly the same as Zuckerberg. Edison did not invent the lightbulb, but created the first practical version that people wanted to use.
It's not about who was first, but who changed things the most.
well computer help us a lot now.
lovelplants 1 month ago
I feel they should have put Dennis Ritchie in place of Zuckerberg, but that aside, great video! It really is incredible just how far we've gotten in only a century's time.
Dms12444 1 month ago in playlist Computers
at 1:08 she says "computers are just machines that eed to be told what to do by humans." Remember also that humans are just machines that need to be told what to do by computers.
PeeteyP 3 months ago
@ 1:03 what she says will change soon
superprodude1 9 months ago
Zuckerberg??...
kurt05051987 9 months ago
Sorry i like the video but Mark Zuckerburg is a genius? A bit degrading for Alan Turing and others.
gerjaison 9 months ago 2
@espinetmatt
Poor arguments there my friend. To be well known does not mean historicly important.
I can name at least dozen of others who contrbuted by far more(real engineers).
Zuckerberg is jus a nice story behind the real project. Nothing to do with real engineering.
Your POV about Stallman is childish and won't discuss any further.
moveaxebx 11 months ago
@moveaxebx all im saying is it doesnt matter. they are not going to put 500 people in a 4 minute video.
how is my pov of stallman childish? if someones a jerk to you, and thinks hes better than you. wouldn't you think poorly of that person? stop whining.
espinetmatt 11 months ago
@espinetmatt
-No they can put ~10 people (like they did) and non of the shoud be Zuckerberg.
It's like you are summerizig the history of film and show a porn star as an example. Yes, it's well know, but no cultural contibutions whatsoever and someone would argue, only devastation. It's the same thing with computer history, but through technological aspect.
moveaxebx 11 months ago 2
It's such a shame to put Zuckerberg there and _not_ to inlcude Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson....in fact Zuckerberg shouldn't be there in the first place.
I found them even more segnificant then mr. Gates or mr.Jobs.
What about the Xerox Parc??
moveaxebx 11 months ago
Whether you like Facebook or not, you can't deny he has played a huge part in the advancement of social media on the web
MrDylanBurich 11 months ago
I don't think Zuckerberg should be there...
shaurz 11 months ago
@shaurz Agreed
fedekiller 11 months ago
@shaurz software is nothing without the computer. the computer is nothing without software. i'm pretty sure you hear of facebook where ever you go.
espinetmatt 11 months ago
@espinetmatt But Facebook did nothing for computing, there were plenty of social network sites before it.
shaurz 11 months ago 9
@espinetmatt
Facebook was not first social network. Facebook did not invent any new technology. Facebook is _propagated_ social network, nothing else.
Only someone who doesn't know anything about the history of computing can claim that Zuckerberg was important. Tesla and Edison played bigger role then Zuckerberg. The author of mp3 compression did more and it's the technology we use every day and no one knows his name.
Where's Linus Torvalds?
Where's Richard Stallman?
Zuckerberg???Yeah right..
moveaxebx 11 months ago 4
@moveaxebx - I speculate there's one thing Zuckerberg did that deserves his baby face in this video. Donated some (maybe alot of) money to Computer History Museum.
gerjaison 9 months ago
@moveaxebx Yes Zuckerberg did not invent the first social network, his significance is that he created the first social network that became as widespread as it is, the one that people wanted to use. You seem to think that Edison is more important than Zuckerberg, but you fail to realize that he is exactly the same as Zuckerberg. Edison did not invent the lightbulb, but created the first practical version that people wanted to use.
It's not about who was first, but who changed things the most.
grahas1 5 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@espinetmatt I hear about pop stars all the time as well, doesnt mean that they are important.
TheDarkFalcon 11 months ago
excellent
paskahousus 11 months ago
Great vid!
mafbbb 11 months ago 3