I wonder if he cuts out all the non-factual pages from his bible as well. That'll make it a rather thin book. I mean, let's say he's right about that The Flood created Grand Canyon, can anyone present facts that God initiated that flood?
@swinkyuk You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
If you're thinking about listening to andyrooney12's cooments below,let me save you the trouble.Science actually proves creation.Google both sides of the argument and decide for yourself.
@genesisevent2 lmao. another "google galileo" i am so looking forward to you providing the reference to the scientific journal that has the article proving creation.
@uknowispeaksense lol-I am so looking forward to the day when Jesus returns,and every eye will see Him,and we can throw all the evolution books in the trash.
@genesisevent2 did you know (and this comes from a catholic) that theres NO evidence OTHER than the bible that jesus ever existed? food for thought, hun.
If you're thinking about watching this let me save you about one & a half hours...this guy went to prison for all sorts of criminal behavior. He is a charlatan and a scumbag. Everything he said has been refuted by science. If you want to continue to waste your time then go ahead.
I couldn't take more than 10 minutes of this...you don't see guys like this outside the US getting any more attention than a mad guy yelling in the park corners...
@foroparapente You are just another chicken hiding out in the YT comment hen house. Come to The life Science Prize an be the hero of evolution, but no you won't because you have nothing that could pass the science test.
10:00 ... wow, Kent Hovand needs to be removed from society. How can someone who so willingly colludes the truth and purposefully leads people away from what is real be allowed to continue.
@ChaosmanOne - Prove it or shut up. Yeah...that's what I thought. More mindless wishful thinking from evolutionist idiots. I find it remarkable that your hypocrisy knows no bounds. The fact that embryology is STILL distorted and used in the textbooks over 100 YEARS LATER by itself PROVES the great lengths that evolutionist have to and are willing to go to simply to look like they have a shred of evidence for their religion.
No one "believes" in evolution, just like no one "believes" in gravity or "believes" that ice cream exists. Evolution is just a scientific fact and the theory of evolution is one of science's most well proven, robust theories. No belief here, just plain truth. You "believe" evolution is a lie and you probably "believe" your religion. Luckily your "beliefs" will never continue to hurt the world. The bloodshed of ignorance and religion will end. You lose. Mankind will survive. Sorry.
I agree like hell with everything but the last sentence. Don't you know how close we are to electing UBER religious Republicans? The Republican Party has become the party of Jesus.
That's very true. It's a scary thought. The worst case scenario is that our society gets driven back to the bronze age. I really, really hope that doesn't happen. All we can do as people is educate ourselves as much as we can. Belief in some loose definition of a god isn't itself such a bad thing. It's an interesting idea. Treating it beyond just an idea is a very dangerous thing to do. I really hope people get that.
Friend, please converse with me in private messages, as I've been sending you lengthier responses because of the limit here, which you've not responded to. As for your recent questions, which have been answered before; the seas get saltier every year, which means they are saltier today than they were 4400 years ago. The flood, which was not ocean water, was less salty, which became saltier over time. The lakes formed by trapped water, landlocked, after the waters receded to the ocean basins.
There are salt water crocs and fresh water crocs. I bet they had a common ancestor; a crocodile! We know as a fact that such adaptations are possible, and the ones able to adapt to fresh water (a limited amount seeing as how there are more salt water fish than fresh water fish) were able to adapt to fresh water. I don't know how many pounds of hay/fruit/grain, etc. The adaptation of "teeth" is not necessary; e.g. fruits bats and panda bears have extremely sharp teeth and eat only plants.
@LetsTalkChrist Why then, do we see utterly different teeth in carnivores/herbivores? "Possible adaptations" yes sunbeam, but since the pyramids and stonehenge were built? I can understand how a strong delusion may make a person or group believe anything (fairies, yetis, Santa etc.) But to use any or similar as a basis to ignore, deliberately misinterpret or plain deny a vast body of scientific evidence is simply astounding! Panda's are indeed carnivores, on the wrong diet, going extinct.
@LetsTalkChrist So then once upon a time the whole world was under (salt) water. But oddly, when the baby Jesus took away the extra water, vast bodies of fresh water remained landlocked (Great lakes etc.) "But shouldn't these be salt water, from marine transgression?" asked a small clever boy, who was beaten up badly by an insane preacher, crying "HERETIC be DAMNED" He never got a chance to ask why the modern distribution of Marsupials & Lemurs etc. are confined to specific areas.
The Bible is clear nothing was carnivorous until after the flood. So no, the animals did not eat each other. Further, The Bible is clear Noah stored up enough food for his year long journey. Noah was likely smart enough to bring babies (they eat less, take up less space, live longer, etc etc). I recommend the video called "The Garden of Eden" which I have favorited on my channel, which explains all of this at great length.
@LetsTalkChrist So this ark, how much hay/fruit/veg did it accomodate? (For all those "veggies") Did the (carnivore) adaptations to teeth/alimentary canal(s) also happen only in the last "4 & a bit" thousand years? My students find your answers very amusing, please help keep the end of my tutorials fun. (The best/funniest one was you mentioning evolution/adaptation, how we laughed!)
It is clear that Noah did not bring any fish on the Ark (they had plenty of water outside). Further, it is clear animals can adapt with great success, within limitations. A freshwater fish adapting to sea water, or vice versa, is hardly a difficulty (it can be demonstrated in a lab). Polar bears, too, adapted to cold climates. And guess what they came from? BEARS! This is not evolution, this is adaptation.
@LetsTalkChrist Freshwater fish don't adapt to saline at all easilly. Your child like reasononig is appropriate for such a naive soul, who believes such obvious fiction & tries to use it as a basis for valid science. My point (dumbass) is how did Noah accomodate ARCTIC species and DESERT species in the same little boat? This question just illustrates how absurd the poor Gilgamesh copy is as a basis (i've lots more sunbeam) please don't mention evolution, that's for the big boys!
@LetsTalkChrist just because we call something a bear, then it evolves into a different kind of bear doesn't mean anything. we set the rules for what a bear is, nothing magical, you get to caught up in names. life is life, nothing more.
The dating methods you trust have been proven to be based on circular reasoning, speculation and conjecture. There is no evidence to suggest Damascus is nearly that old, since there is no written record of its existence prior to about 2000 BC. You believe Damascus is that old, but you only believed what you were told. No critical study was done on your part to prove it. As with all things that try to undermine The Bible, your beliefs are based on unprovable assumptions.
@bhong32 So the Hindu's will face Allah, The Muslims will face Yaweh, The Jews will face any of the above, is that so? Us Humanists will just die, so will you, you sad twat!
@bhong32 This God then, which one? Zeus was pretty popular a while ago. There is as much proof/evidence for him as there is for the Judeo/christian one i.e. fuck all!
@Fishzero00001 The water which now covers 3/4 of the Earth could cover 100% of the globe if you re-arrange the geography. The world's oceans and mountains were the result of the world wide flood. The world before the flood was vastly different, with the water under the crust of the Earth, which burst forth from the mid-oceanic ridges. That is why all the major mountain ranges are perfectly parallel to the mid-oceanic ridges from where the waters burst forth and the continents slid. Look it up.
@LetsTalkChrist OK so the "pre flood world" a few thousand years ago was "vastly different" What evidence is there? The Andes (very) roughly follow the mid Pacific ridge, part of the way. The mid Atlantic ridge has NO MOUNTAINS parallel to them at all! Have you ever looked at an atlas? What of the Himalayas? If this is your "evidence" stick to Bible fiction and poor copies of the (Older) Gilgamesh (everyone agrees it's older Sunbeam, EVERYONE!)
@Fishzero00001 The evidence the pre-flood world was different are the fossils, which show far greater diversity and size of modern day counter-parts. Just to name a few, a giant penguins, rhinos, beavers, insects of virtually every kind, all were far better off in the past, all around the world. A world wide event made it impossible for them to grow to such large proportions, and they ended up as fossils (due to the flood). I recommend the Seminar called "The Garden of Eden" that explains this
More proof that you don't understand earth history. The flood is a myth, for (at the time) illiterate peasants and now children. Many species of flora & fauna have evolved at different times to different conditions. (the Carboniferous Oxygen high gave us giant dragonflies and coal too) I can recommend Peter Pan as a guide to eternal youth. Where did Noah put: Freshwater fish, termites/deathwatch beetles, Polar bears etc.? How did he feed them? Did they eat each other? Or the Ark itself?
@LetsTalkChrist Another problem for you saddo's is recorded human history. Considering the age of cities like Damascus, it must have been in Noah's flood. Did no one notice?
@Fishzero00001 The planet is now covered 3/4 in water. If you raised the sea beds and eroded the mountains you could cover the entire world in water. The water was once under the crust of the Earth, as The Bible says "Psalm 24:2 for he founded the Earth upon the waters". 4400 years ago, "Genesis 7:11 all the fountains of the great deep were broken up", the water shot up the surface, which then triggered "Psalm 104:8 The mountains rose, the valleys sank down". The flood water is now the oceans.
@LetsTalkChrist Why, prey tell would I or anyone wish to "raise the sea beds & erode the mountains"? (Why bother with the sea beds at all you numpty). Are you suggesting then that within recent Human history there were no mountains (except Arrarat!) Where was the subterranean water stored? Where is your evidence for all of the aforementioned? What age are all of the Earth's mountains then? (all apparently the same eh?) Are you serious?
The flood legends conspicuously always include a boat, all the animals in the world, and a family who are the last surviving people on the planet. Sound familiar? Besides, we know there was a world wide flood, which is the only explanation for the fossil record.
@LetsTalkChrist No "boat", no beasties = no survival! Gosh that was hard to figure out!
Fossils= lots of seperate/distinct (mostly marine/fluvial) sedimentation episodes across over 500 million years, preserving hard body parts. So then sumbeam, do you reckon all fossils are of the same age? Why are most of them marine organisms? (Did the baby Jesus & his magic wand put cephalopod molluscs and trilobites on land?) This'll be the funniest yet, I can't wait!
@LetsTalkChrist Here's another one. Has it ever occurred to you that Marine fossils (bivalve/cetacean etc.) found in the Andes/JHimalayas etc. Were deposited when those peaks were marine sediments, deposited in boring horizontal beds below sea level, subsequently upthrust to form mountains? Now here's a thought, did the baby Jesus wave his little wand & A) move the continents around to form mountains? or B) flood the whole Earth with water that doesn't exist?
@Fishzero00001 I have no reason to call you names because I am not insecure in my beliefs. The Bible can be proved prophetically (predictions of the future), scientifically (how did Job know the earth was spinning in space, Job 26:7, 38:14), and using Archeology (we found Noah's Ark, Mount Sinai, the Red Sea Crossing, Sodom and Gomorrah, etc etc). The Bible is also always correct in its dates, locations, and historical assessment of nations. Face it, you just hate God. Your arguments fail.
@LetsTalkChrist Put, simply it never foretold anything. It is so vague in it's vocab anything can be "seen" in it,s thousands of racist, homophobic, chauvanist words. "Noah's ark"!!!!!!!! Anyone taking you even o.oooooo1% seriously until now is rolling on the floor, tears rolling down cheeks etc. Antway this Bible was once much larger (& smaller) It has been retranslated & edited so much that It cannot resemble it's original form, but you prefer it to scientific evidence?
@LetsTalkChrist You aren't insecure in your absurd, laughable beliefs, that's the problem. You are plain wrong, you ignore evidence and opt for inaccurate, laughable, racist, sexist, homophobic rants in remnant form. Noah's ark??!!?? be serious (have you heard of Gilgamesh? The original fiction, ripped off badly by some idiot yonks ago.)
@Fishzero00001 The epic of gilgamesh, like other stories of the flood, are evidence that in the memory of mankind there was a worldwide event (a flood). There a literally flood legends in every major culture in history, the best explanation for which is they all attempted to explain what was clearly an event in their history. As time went on, those stories became legends, but The Bible preserved the truth of the event. Again, you are just a typical God hater who has no interest in truth.
@LetsTalkChrist There are rivers/seas in every culture, ergo flood myths. That's that one done! anyhow sumbeam if by ark evidence you mean the Sino/Turk evangelical mission stuff, it's as funny/unreliable/absurd as a long line of others (one every 3 or so years) It's a rock formation/shrine or both (probabbly Armenian 4/5th century)
There is no such thing as evidence for the non-existence of anything. Genesis says when Adam and Eve sinned, the creation was cursed and the woman's trouble in childbirth began. Since you are a naturalist, you assume there is a natural explanation for her increase in pain (hips). The book of Revelation says when God restores the world," Revelation 21:4 "There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain" That means the original creation did not include pain, until Adam and Eve sinned.
I do "good things" because I love God and love people. Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, and perhaps at first someone comes to the cross of Jesus for fear of Hell. While indeed that is shallow, God is even willing to accept us on that basis at first, for so great is His love and desire to save us. After salvation, the Spirit of God works with a Christian and moves them away from fear (because Christians are saved from Hell and thus no longer fear it) and then moved to Godly service.
@LetsTalkChrist The kind of Bible swallowing brainwashed rubbish I'd expect from someone like you, The fact that all evidence points to no God at all doesn't bother you at all, and you are a programmed. hell fearing droid What of the deleted gospels? still no answer I see.
@Fishzero00001 There are no "deleted gospels". A deletion by nature assumes it was part of the canon, and then removed. The early church never accepted the gnostic gospels, where were forgeries of the 2nd and 3rd centuries, decades after the beginning of the church and the conception of the original gospels which the church had used since its beginning (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). The church recognized they were forgeries immediately, because they contradicted the OT and the NT.
@LetsTalkChrist It all happened more than a century after the events described (NT) "Forgeries" strange choice or word! The whole thing is full of "contradictions" you fool Any Idiot basing their World view on that heap of fiction (no provenance, wrong dates/Emperors etc.) Rather than scientific rigiour/data/evidence has a major problem. So Did James & Mary M' have nothing to say at all? What's wrong with gnosticism? You just don't get it do you?
Genesis 3:16 "To the woman He said, "I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children." If we shared a common ancestor with primates, we would indeed expect our birth issues to be similar, and they are not. Genesis explains why. As for the Guinea worm, as said prior, worms in their natural use are friendly to the environment, but as per Genesis 3:18 (2 verses later), the creation became hostile due to sin. You are a God hating bigot, to your own hurt
@LetsTalkChrist So then, after "Adam sinned" Women's pelvises narrowed (the reason for that "womens trouble"/childbirth) and then they were bipedal (couldn't be before you see, hips too wide) You Bible swallowers aren't at all good at figuring things out for yourselves. PS do you only do good things for fear of hell fire? Or do/can you empathise? If the only thing making you do good deeds is fear of hell, you're a bit sad & shallow. Another "funny" answer please!
As you may or may not know, The Bible is clear in Genesis that pain, sickness, and death, and even woman's trouble in child birth, began after Adam sinned. God made a perfect world, and we ruined it. Worms are good for the environment, but due to the introduction of sin, have been misplaced from their natural use as God intended. Tumors and other diseases and tragic sicknesses are the result of a world fallen into decay and separated from God's original design.
@LetsTalkChrist The Guinea worm is a truly hideous parasite, but anyone displaying such staggering sexist nonsense can also be excused for a high degree of ignorance! So no death for a while & original sin, the evidence for these assertions please. What of the deleted gospels etc. Did they contain any relevant words of God? & how would you know? You have a highly evolved brain, try using it.
@LetsTalkChrist "Woman's trouble" There's a phrase from a man of the World if ever there was one! You must have noticed how our close primate relatives have very few childbirth issues, as well as not being bipedal. They also don't get haemorrhoids or backaches either, but apparently the first primate couple didn't have an untrustworthy male, so "Mrs Chimp" et al don't suffer"! Proves it then, Darwin must be wrong! Where's that baby Jesus & his magic wand?
God designed all life able to adapt to their environment. Darwin's finches had different sized beaks, since God designed the finch to be able to adapt (within strict limitations) to survive. A beak changing size by no means demonstrates evolution; it remains a beak, and the bird a finch. This does not prove the finch came from a non-finch, or that birds came from non-birds. No new information was created. It just adapted an already existing trait. You are just deceived and hate God.
@LetsTalkChrist The Human genome has at least 30,000 genes. Many genetic functions involve combinations of more than one, or several genes. This gives a cosmic number of possible functions, or phenotype variations to environments and changes therein.Birds and dinosaurs have a common ancestry, as do all mammals, indeed all organisms. Evidence for the above is abundant, verifiable and clear. Evidence for a "designer" is laughable and absent.
@LetsTalkChrist Your "designer" is a bit evil and incompetent.
OK so it designs the pretty buttercup, butterfly etc. What of the Guinea worm? or tumours? Why do people get backache, piles etc. (we haven't properly adapted to bipedalism, that's why it's also why childbirth is fairly tricky too. God's "own image" C'mon be serious!) And this Bible thing, was any part of "God's true word" in the bits history has edited out? (Mary's gospel etc). This'll be funny.
Jesus' birth was foretold before His birth, He had students during his life called disciples who kept his teachings, and were eye witnesses to His death and resurrection. Evolution however is based on the lies of people who have been deceived to believe natural processes like natural selection are capable of doing things that have never been observed. Natural selection selects, thus it's name. It's like a DVD menu; simply selecting from what is already available never creates anything new!
@LetsTalkChrist Oh you poor sad fool. All things jesus related are 2nd /3rd hand hearsay at best (how much was written in his own lifetime? What provenance? authorship?) Heaps of evidence have been "observed" and selection is at a gene/macromolecular level, dictated by environmental change(s) and conditions. The best genes survive & replicate the best adapted survive. very simple really, put that silly old book away and try it.
@LetsTalkChrist So the "Baby Jesus did it all" theory is better then?
I'll put it simply Evolution (through natural selection)= tons of evidence, all of which survives scrutiny Vs creation(Baby Jesus)ism= no evidence whatsoever.
Evolution has been so thoroughly debunked, but the evolutionists continue in their ignorance. They say things like "Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 165 million years", but science is defined by things we can test, repeat, and observe! You can not test, repeat, or observe millions of years! The Bible says dinosaurs we killed in a world wide flood, which is why we find them as fossils in the first place! God is real folks! Believe it!
@LetsTalkChrist How shall I put this? Where do I start? You're deeply ignorant.
"Test" Yep many times over, ALL valid, Proven. "Observe" (and comprehend, by proposing valid testabl/feasible models/hypotheses) ALL VALID and PROVEN again.
Whilst we cannot repeat X millions of years, we don't have to! Now run along and believe any other little fairy stories as you wish, but don't base anything sound or rational upon them, please! "Biblical dino's?" Nope!
Around 4:30 or so is absolutely hilarious. He rants for 3 minutes about how the textbooks don't enforce the law by teaching non-factual evidence (which is absolute bullshit, seeing as Hovind is too damn dumb to distinguish the difference between a scientific theory and a common theory) - then, immediately after, he goes and questions why creation isn't taught in science textbooks. What a hypocrite.
@skakillers Really? When I look at the amazing complexity of the universe, stars, living cells, atoms, math, science, and etc.... God is the most logical reason for me. I cannot believe that all of this was just happenstance. Agnosticism makes more sense to me than atheism.
@karozans What you have to realize is that I meant this in a strictly explanatory sense. If we are to accept that god created the universe, then that does not really answer the question or provide any meaningful explanation, and begs the question of the exigence of god. A universe created without the interference of god is a simpler explanation, in terms of the further questions it raises. Therefore, it is the more acceptable answer using occam's razor.
The reason why evolutionism is considered the "science" of our race to this day is because our race strives off speculative perception back-boned by healthy and logical proven observations and facts. I almost can't even think straight when I hear this guy's voice, it is truly that bad. When you preach and lecture over a topic proned towards celebrating non-bias then don't use tone of voice to give alternative opinions an adolescent and humorous sense of figure you asshole.
Our mortality makes it that we need a form of belief even if it were to try to prove ourselves that there is no God and all the beautiful things in our world came to existence through a fortuitous process. Read Carnegie conversion to Darwinism and you should understand that it was very religious in nature. "I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only had I got rid of theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution.""
Hovind also pleaded 'no contest' to three charges of zoning violations, etc in 2006, was found guilty of lying about his assets and income in '96, renounced his US citizenship in '98, was found in '04 to be operating a business without a licence, and was charged with 89 counts of tax evasion, fraud, destroying records...
Had his passport and many firearms confiscated (along with $42,000 in loose cash around his home) in '02
One way of illustrating how most organised religions are, utterly unlike evolution, very good at "social control" would be to do the following. Go to Riyadh, stroll down any main road (near a police station) while drinking from a Jack Daniels bottle, holding another mans hand........ go on .Try it ! Because after all religion isn't a "social control mechanism" but a valid branch of science is, apparently...... Or are you wrong, yet again!
4/5. Need I remind evolutionists everywhere, you received an invitation and joined the Catholic Church. Piltdown Pope, has validated evolution as being legitimate. By default, that invitation was accepted by all scientists and evolutionists. Catholics have a unique brand of Christianity, they ignore the words of Jesus Christ. Pope Ratzinger, totes a bent wooden crucifix to publiclly mock Jesus Christ. Science failed when it abandoned the truth & God to practice deception & Medieval Sorcery.
What do these Ancient Empires have in common, Babylon, Aztecs, Incas, Roman, Greek, Lost City of Atlantis?
Really should have left the Science Department and spent some time in the other Liberal Arts. Art & History, photography and painting with an emphasis on self-portraits. Those Old Masters painted portraits with such detail. Hard to distinguish from a photo image converted to oil with Photo Art. Not just a slight resemblance, the splitting image, ROFLMAO!
His job after dropping the clothing of his early year Nazi regalia was changed to salesman for a Chemical Supply Company. Old Ratzinger the Piltdown Pope was #1 Salesman of the month for a gas called Cyanide which he supplied the Nazi Death Camps. SO WHAT? You sick Satanic Evil piece of shit.
@waketheoblivious So you don't get irony either? So the Pope supports evolution, ergo all supporters of evolution are Papist (!?!?) Do you recall a similar phrase about swans being white? Probably not, as it isn't insane Biblical nonsense for paranoid idiots. The Papacy is as corrupt and wrong as any other organised religious group, including yours, anyway Piltdown man is very very old news. Oh and Stalin was responsible for far more deaths, probably 3 times as many, so your point is.....?
No question about it Stalin tops the list of Genocidal Maniacs, Mao and Hitler placing a distant 2nd and 3rd. Those 3 men each imported the identical 2 part strategy to ensure the success of the genocide they later accomplish. First, they induced the general population to think of themselves as an animals not human beings (integrate evolution into education). Second, sway society to adopt a system of time measured by a geologic timeline verses Religious Reference Books. cont..
Each Genocidal Maniac adopted the same highly effective strategy. Condition society for slaughter, then execute the plan. Those 3 genocidal events, were highly orchestrated. Although textbooks don't reveal it, the facts & historians do. Example, Israel attacked US Naval Ship Liberty. LBJ was ballistic they didn't sink it. 1962 CIA proposed Operation Northwoods. A plan to disguise as Cubans attack r own bases to garner support for a Cuban War. JFK, refused & fired his Jt. Chief.
@waketheoblivious Society doesn't give a toss about geological or Biblical timescales, apathy is king thesedays. Each example you cite is a product of nationalism, only a sufferer of a paranoid psychosis could begin to swallow the line you propose! I cannot recall Hitler refering to the "German/Aryan people(s)" as "animals" at any point or to the Palaezoic (ditto Stalin etc.) please cite where they did, or admit you got it wrong, oh, and check your medication too
get off your lazy Nazi ass and do your own homework. Apparently, the author if the post in the Oxford Dictionary was also able to locate ample number of sources to write what they did regarding the word race. I'll post that as the only assistance to you doing your own homework.
"Although ideas of race are centuries old, it was not until the 19th century that attempts to systematize racial divisions were made. Ideas of supposed racial superiority and social Darwinism reached their culmination in Nazi ideology of the 1930s and gave pseudoscientific justification to policies and attitudes of discrimination, exploitation, slavery, and extermination...."
@waketheoblivious Plain wrong. One race Homo sapiens. "Social Darwinism" is a phrase that has nothing to do with evolution whatsoever (Nazi's misunderstood "Fitness" as you do. Nothing at all to do with strength, superiority etc. just the ability to produce successful, breeding offspring)
With our highly evolved brains we can empathise, so we don't (all) act like Stalin as we know it's not nice, we know what it'd feel like, quotes in context please.
@Fishzero00001 Long before messers Hitler (who believed in God) & Stalin etc. Ghengis Khan, Darius and Alexander all regarded their opponents as "inferior" and "not (as) worthy" as their own forces/peoples but from an imperialist/Nationalist perspective. Your silly paranoid efforts don't relate to evolution at all!
And, Hitler adopted the Jesuit 5th Oath for his SS. What was he thinking Jesuits had been kicked out of every Country in Europe. History of the Jesuits, their history infected the last 3 Centuries.
@waketheoblivious So, I'm a Jewish atheist Catholic? So all the "evidence" is wrong, and you are correct? And you're not paranoid? You should read some science books (have a little picture of a protestant baby Jesus looking down on you, if it helps) and take a few pills!
PS science exposed Piltdown man as a crude fraud, not idiot Christians, because they've got so much "evidence" for Jesus.............Haven't they?
Any of the leaders of modern history display a remarkable resemblance or in fact, the splitting image of some ancient familiar faces? You'll recognize some of them eventually hahahahaha, been engrossed with all your "science" and didn't spend time looking at art, reading literature, emphasis on the classics. Figured out why never combine art science Museums together. Fucking scientists wouldn't recognize their own ass from a hole in the wall. Only images recognized, be of overrated scientists.
3/5. July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastic letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). As he delivered his historical letter, the press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope's recent acknowledgment of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division that has existed. Evolutionists just got an invitation to the Catholic Church, they can't refuse.
2/5. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
1/5. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
Restating the obvious question, that separates the bull from bullshit. Repeatable results that give the precise location within an event we can safely assume are where science has demonstrated & provided "irrefutable evidence" associated with all locations of absolute truth. In the theory of evolution, where is that point? Shame, science has found several routes to locations of truth yet fails to identify God.
What is the distance science refers to when weak become strong fields and the point where a constant current is no longer constant. Does science provide a precise location for either of those events? If it can and is repeatable then we can safely assume that science has found a point of truth. Matter of fact, I am positive science can demonstrate having found several points of truth. Where is that point in evolution so it can legitimately be taught as fact?
Anthropology really should refine not just to study ancient civilizations, but focus on how ancient scientists resemble the oblivious bonehead scientists today. Morons think is modern science is advanced yet has not achieved what ancient science did. Of course they did mix a lot of Sorcery with theirs. We got evolution 150+ yrs ago, they got it introduced by science about 150 before their demise too. Followed by the associated 1014 yr sentence to Hell, this run the Hell penalty is eternity.
The question you should be asking yourself is why the Piltdown Pope was able to address the July 2009 G8 Conference? G8 is the Governing Board of the United Nations. He was not there as a Conscientious Objector, delivering a speech. Piltdown Pope did not request he DIRECTED them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral Authority (Anti-Christ).
Go back to sleep, Atheists are held in the same regard as Christians, Muslims & Jews - Your choice is God or Satan.
"A law differs from a scientific theory in that it does not posit a mechanism or explanation of phenomena: it is merely a distillation of the results of repeated observation. As such, a law is limited in applicability to circumstances resembling those already observed, and is often found to be false when extrapolated. Ohm's law only applies to constant currents, Newton's law of universal gravitation only applies in weak gravitational fields"
if u dont believe in evolution then there is something wrong with u wne its a proven fact i sware just watch wimp(dot)com/niceinfo it proves it its scientfic evidence that proves we are monkeys and if u dont like being a monkey tough u r a monkey
Thank you - you took the words right out of my mouth. ;-) But don't worry. Given enough time and patience, someone will be able to explain how humans evolved in a language you can follow.
Noel Dilly (1992) identified some pterobranchs (organisms with some similarities to some graptolites.)
Graptolites (numerous distinct species have been identified, they are very good guide fossils) have been extinct for well over 300 million years. Yet again the Idiot liar/fraudster deliberately tries to confuse the gullible!
Many living speciesare closely related to or resemble extinct species, I.e. Horseshoe crabs and Trilobites. This clearly DOESN'T mean trilobites AREN'T EXTINCT!
So, Abortion (Fuck all to do with evolution by the way!) The main offender then, the cause of 90%+ of the removal of fertilised "viable" eggs (embryos if you will) from the womb, or failure to implant must be the creator God then!
"Baby Jesus, Worlds Biggest Abortionist"
quite a headline
(what i mean by this is the fact that over 9/10 fertilised eggs are indeed "flushed out" by the menstral cycle, due to chemical/hormonal messages not getting through in enough time)
not to mention that its mostly chirstains that end up needing to get abortions and the 1s that dont get the abortions end up having babys when they r 16 sometimes younger
Hovind's target audience are gullible christians to start with (using, as they do, as a starting point a set of contradictory books of unknown provenance/authorship edited and mistranslated to oblivion!) Note how he quotes short phrases from a textbook to make it appear contradictory (ignoring 99%+ of the whole verifiable text as he does so.) Contradictions abound in the Bible, but they AREN'T verified by the remainder of the text. Can you spot the key difference?
Hovind (convicted criminal) is wrong on so many issues, it is difficult to know where to begin. The complete stratigraphic column isn't found anywhere, but it doesn't take a genius to put together a jijsaw! His assertion that "all the fossils are the same age" isn't backed up by any evidence (because it's laughable nonsense!) Way up criteria conformities/unconformities and palaeoclimate-palaoenvironmental evidence, long before isotope data are all used to "date" beds, not just fossils!
"Money is the root of all evil"? Historically, money has taken many forms including trinkets, beads, feathers, precious metals and printed paper. Crossing a desert with a briefcase containing $5,000 dollars, what is the value of a bottle of water that could save your life? Money provides a convenient means of economic exchange. The amount we are willing to pay determined by the level of value (demand) for the product or service (supply). What determines abundance, scarcity or shortages?
Where on the bullshit timeline of evolution does man display free will? This will, that will, her will, his will, my will or Thy Will be done on earth as it is in Heaven? Man was created & granted free will. With that, the choice to use it had to exist. No option to use it, is Not free will. Clearly, God had second thoughts regarding having even created us. If not for Noah and Moses, man would have ceased to exist. Failure 101, free will failure and you worship the first to have failed.
Nine innocent letters from the English language combine to form the word deception. Deception is the very essence of Evil. At some point, most everyone has been a victim of deception. Not a pleasant feeling to have been tricked, deceived or deliberately left in the dark. Most did not enjoy being left in the dark in their personal or business lives, then why opt for ignorance in one's spiritual life. What is the first rule of war? Know your enemy?
Ever noticed the similarities between JC and Mythras? Or Mary and Aphrodite? Lots of Biblical fiction derives from earler religious bunk, or hadn't you noticed?
Why not ask your Baby Jesus if i'm genuine or not, oh, and ask why his Dad allowed the Holocaust too while you're at it!
Was he on a "Miracle Holiday" at the time? Or are water into wine, bush burning, child sacrifice and red Sea parting etc. all he does?
The Satanic Lullaby aka the conscious choice to remain ignorant. Cruise Control, Air Bags, Automatic Climate Control are topics discussed in a Owners Manual for a car. Go back 100 years & those topics would sound like science fiction. You would be telling the truth, but few any would believe those systems were possible.
Fishzero, Dr of Deception. I imagine the number of paragraphs you have read in the Bible is less then 50. Half assed effort to read the Bible then post half witted comments.
As I clearly stated earlier i read it ALL and it made no sense, naieve tosh for the gullible, in an age before modern science for medieval peasants to believe, you too apparently! I'm off with some fictional students on a fictitious field trip so I won't be around to watch you repeat crap to yourself and evade difficult questions. Read more hilarity from you in a few weeks Mr "pottymouth" oddball
PS I'm also Jewish (by birth) and atheist by common sense and, a "Nazi" according to you!
My Jewish friends believe in God and that with God all things are possible. Entirely possible then that God knew the future when He made His covenant. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not mutually exclusive entities. Belief in any one member of the Holy Trinity automatically picks up the Whole. Through Him With Him In Him by the Unity of His Holy Spirit all glory and honor are yours forever and ever. The consecration of the Christ when He became Jesus Christ. "have you not known Me Philip?.."
A legal theme that runs throughout the Bible with constant references to "by who's authority" The Pharaoh was smug having reasoned God had given His Word and He would never again destroy using a flood. God kept His Word, the Red Sea never left it's banks. arkdiscovery. com provides several photos and a 27 minute video that provides compelling evidence they have discovered the location of the crossing. Remnants of Chariots, weapons, bones etc. it's worth considering their data.
as for your water turning into wine criss angel can do that so does that mean hes jesus or god it was accually water into beer u can go check that out if u havent seen it its uploaded on youtube
Fishzero00001 <-------------- Claims to be a PhD, makes no reference to a Doctoral Thesis and there is an obvious difference in how a PhD addresses a topic verses Fish offering conclusions based on inconclusive evidence that does not meet the standard of irrefutable evidence. Read the statements made by true PhD scientists, they read much differently then those written by Fishthezero who is a fraud.
I must retain a degree of anonymity you fool (Real names are not used, in case you hadn't noticed) I address the topic as one should. In short, Evolution through NS is as proven as any theory can be whereas rants about pyschics, mediums, conspiracies and satanism, all from the same barking source have never and will, never be credible or withstand controlled test conditions. What are your O levels in?
Are you a creationist? A pseudopsychic? or just deeply sad and misinformed?
If you are uniting diverse strands then under what title/thesis/hypothesis? If Darwin = wrong, then what in your shockingly limited, angry little sphere = truth?
For the reasons described earlier I cannot give too much detail about my thesis (I don't want twats like you figuring out my name/address) but it concerned , the origin of life on Earth and the Cambrain explosion. My work has been referred to by Bill Bryson and Richard Dawkins. I could be 6' tall, ginger and French or a 4' bald transsexual, you'll never know!
What of you? (My students find you very amusing, more please!)
"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be a miracle, so many conditions which would have to been satisfied to get it going."
- Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winning biochemist
My stance is the one shared by honest men. The rest can rationalize and justify their irrational behavior. Liars and frauds like you Fishzero. You are not a PhD, you are a liar.
Piltdown Man is one of a series of frauds that were used to manipulate public opinion. What I have discovered is there are three distinct camps. Those who promote an agenda based on fraud and misrepresentation of fact, those who seek to discover the truth with an agenda to reveal fraud and a large group of oblivious with the same agenda as a domestic cow. Those promoting fraud label those exposing fraud as conspiracy theorists and the oblivious treat honesty as an inconvenient option.
Calm down Sugarplum! Fraud is a big word you know. That quote from the discredited "Oops, I'd better retract my comment about inteligence and race" Crick is a repeat from you, as irrelevant now as it was last time, (He's made lots of controversial comments in his time).
Is your Paranoia being treated? If so, I'd get a medication review, and quickly!
Hey Kent, don't drop the soap!
bigfilmhat 2 weeks ago
love the video man
sprattysy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS ADMITS TO INTELLIGENT DESIGN?
SEARCH: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
VIEW: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
WATCH: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
KNOW: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
SHARE: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
Dawkins: Civilisation with high level of technology from elsewhere in universe seeded self replicating molecules on this planet?
mat2112moneychangers 2 months ago
I wonder if he cuts out all the non-factual pages from his bible as well. That'll make it a rather thin book. I mean, let's say he's right about that The Flood created Grand Canyon, can anyone present facts that God initiated that flood?
coldert 2 months ago
Why are we listening to someone who committed tax fraud talking about lying?
TaslemGuy 5 months ago 2
@findfreedomintruth Yeah, let's teach the Jewish myths over science.
BlackMetalWhiteZombi 6 months ago
8:47 i bet she didnt go to Harvard
painsey 7 months ago
15 years of students stunted by this idiot.
swinkyuk 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@swinkyuk You cannot understand because you are spiritually dead and love darkness.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Corinthians 2:14
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. John 3:19
BereanBeacon1 8 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 boohoo
nujivaa 8 months ago
Kent Hovind???? lol.
wowamonn 9 months ago
If you're thinking about listening to andyrooney12's cooments below,let me save you the trouble.Science actually proves creation.Google both sides of the argument and decide for yourself.
genesisevent2 11 months ago
@genesisevent2 lmao. another "google galileo" i am so looking forward to you providing the reference to the scientific journal that has the article proving creation.
uknowispeaksense 9 months ago
@uknowispeaksense lol-I am so looking forward to the day when Jesus returns,and every eye will see Him,and we can throw all the evolution books in the trash.
genesisevent2 9 months ago
@genesisevent2 does that mean you don't have that reference? surprise surprise.
uknowispeaksense 9 months ago
@genesisevent2 Ignore him my friend if you really did investigate both sides as I have as well; you have proven your self wise.
19910381 9 months ago
@19910381 Thanks! God bless......
genesisevent2 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@genesisevent2 did you know (and this comes from a catholic) that theres NO evidence OTHER than the bible that jesus ever existed? food for thought, hun.
guineapiggyman 8 months ago
@genesisevent2 Jesus is never coming back. If he was ever here to begin with.
BlackMetalWhiteZombi 6 months ago
@BlackMetalWhiteZombi Oh he will be soon.
MattKearneyFan16 6 months ago
@genesisevent2 wow. what google were u using? science doesnt disprove god, but it DOES disprove young earth creationism.
guineapiggyman 8 months ago
If you're thinking about watching this let me save you about one & a half hours...this guy went to prison for all sorts of criminal behavior. He is a charlatan and a scumbag. Everything he said has been refuted by science. If you want to continue to waste your time then go ahead.
andyrooney12 11 months ago
@wayofthemasturbator
says someone with the username wayofthemasturbator
TENNSUMITSUMA 1 year ago
@Alpha1Bravo1Charlie1
'Nothing makes sense without evolution. It's been observed, its been tested and its never been found wanting'
- you sure about that? have you seen this with your own eyes or where you just told that over and over in schools and shit
TENNSUMITSUMA 1 year ago
@TENNSUMITSUMA Yes I am sure.
Alpha1Bravo1Charlie1 1 year ago
I couldn't take more than 10 minutes of this...you don't see guys like this outside the US getting any more attention than a mad guy yelling in the park corners...
foroparapente 1 year ago
@foroparapente You are just another chicken hiding out in the YT comment hen house. Come to The life Science Prize an be the hero of evolution, but no you won't because you have nothing that could pass the science test.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 I am not a scientist, but don't need to be one or to hide to state that this guy is an embarrassment to the US.
foroparapente 1 year ago
Great Hovind got in jail...Only in America can such an incredible idiot win appeal. Do people really believe in Hovind's ignorant shit?
ThinkingBetter 1 year ago
10:00 ... wow, Kent Hovand needs to be removed from society. How can someone who so willingly colludes the truth and purposefully leads people away from what is real be allowed to continue.
ChaosmanOne 1 year ago
@ChaosmanOne - Prove it or shut up. Yeah...that's what I thought. More mindless wishful thinking from evolutionist idiots. I find it remarkable that your hypocrisy knows no bounds. The fact that embryology is STILL distorted and used in the textbooks over 100 YEARS LATER by itself PROVES the great lengths that evolutionist have to and are willing to go to simply to look like they have a shred of evidence for their religion.
dradley1 1 year ago
@dradley1
No one "believes" in evolution, just like no one "believes" in gravity or "believes" that ice cream exists. Evolution is just a scientific fact and the theory of evolution is one of science's most well proven, robust theories. No belief here, just plain truth. You "believe" evolution is a lie and you probably "believe" your religion. Luckily your "beliefs" will never continue to hurt the world. The bloodshed of ignorance and religion will end. You lose. Mankind will survive. Sorry.
brownc01 1 year ago
@brownc01
I agree like hell with everything but the last sentence. Don't you know how close we are to electing UBER religious Republicans? The Republican Party has become the party of Jesus.
cdmillig 11 months ago
@cdmillig
That's very true. It's a scary thought. The worst case scenario is that our society gets driven back to the bronze age. I really, really hope that doesn't happen. All we can do as people is educate ourselves as much as we can. Belief in some loose definition of a god isn't itself such a bad thing. It's an interesting idea. Treating it beyond just an idea is a very dangerous thing to do. I really hope people get that.
brownc01 11 months ago
I think a visit to potholerdebunks' channel would do you a world of good
GeneralMontague 1 year ago
Friend, please converse with me in private messages, as I've been sending you lengthier responses because of the limit here, which you've not responded to. As for your recent questions, which have been answered before; the seas get saltier every year, which means they are saltier today than they were 4400 years ago. The flood, which was not ocean water, was less salty, which became saltier over time. The lakes formed by trapped water, landlocked, after the waters receded to the ocean basins.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
There are salt water crocs and fresh water crocs. I bet they had a common ancestor; a crocodile! We know as a fact that such adaptations are possible, and the ones able to adapt to fresh water (a limited amount seeing as how there are more salt water fish than fresh water fish) were able to adapt to fresh water. I don't know how many pounds of hay/fruit/grain, etc. The adaptation of "teeth" is not necessary; e.g. fruits bats and panda bears have extremely sharp teeth and eat only plants.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Why then, do we see utterly different teeth in carnivores/herbivores? "Possible adaptations" yes sunbeam, but since the pyramids and stonehenge were built? I can understand how a strong delusion may make a person or group believe anything (fairies, yetis, Santa etc.) But to use any or similar as a basis to ignore, deliberately misinterpret or plain deny a vast body of scientific evidence is simply astounding! Panda's are indeed carnivores, on the wrong diet, going extinct.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist So then once upon a time the whole world was under (salt) water. But oddly, when the baby Jesus took away the extra water, vast bodies of fresh water remained landlocked (Great lakes etc.) "But shouldn't these be salt water, from marine transgression?" asked a small clever boy, who was beaten up badly by an insane preacher, crying "HERETIC be DAMNED" He never got a chance to ask why the modern distribution of Marsupials & Lemurs etc. are confined to specific areas.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
The Bible is clear nothing was carnivorous until after the flood. So no, the animals did not eat each other. Further, The Bible is clear Noah stored up enough food for his year long journey. Noah was likely smart enough to bring babies (they eat less, take up less space, live longer, etc etc). I recommend the video called "The Garden of Eden" which I have favorited on my channel, which explains all of this at great length.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist So this ark, how much hay/fruit/veg did it accomodate? (For all those "veggies") Did the (carnivore) adaptations to teeth/alimentary canal(s) also happen only in the last "4 & a bit" thousand years? My students find your answers very amusing, please help keep the end of my tutorials fun. (The best/funniest one was you mentioning evolution/adaptation, how we laughed!)
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
It is clear that Noah did not bring any fish on the Ark (they had plenty of water outside). Further, it is clear animals can adapt with great success, within limitations. A freshwater fish adapting to sea water, or vice versa, is hardly a difficulty (it can be demonstrated in a lab). Polar bears, too, adapted to cold climates. And guess what they came from? BEARS! This is not evolution, this is adaptation.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Freshwater fish don't adapt to saline at all easilly. Your child like reasononig is appropriate for such a naive soul, who believes such obvious fiction & tries to use it as a basis for valid science. My point (dumbass) is how did Noah accomodate ARCTIC species and DESERT species in the same little boat? This question just illustrates how absurd the poor Gilgamesh copy is as a basis (i've lots more sunbeam) please don't mention evolution, that's for the big boys!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist just because we call something a bear, then it evolves into a different kind of bear doesn't mean anything. we set the rules for what a bear is, nothing magical, you get to caught up in names. life is life, nothing more.
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
The dating methods you trust have been proven to be based on circular reasoning, speculation and conjecture. There is no evidence to suggest Damascus is nearly that old, since there is no written record of its existence prior to about 2000 BC. You believe Damascus is that old, but you only believed what you were told. No critical study was done on your part to prove it. As with all things that try to undermine The Bible, your beliefs are based on unprovable assumptions.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
we will all face GOD thats a fact!!
bhong32 1 year ago
@bhong32 So the Hindu's will face Allah, The Muslims will face Yaweh, The Jews will face any of the above, is that so? Us Humanists will just die, so will you, you sad twat!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@bhong32 This God then, which one? Zeus was pretty popular a while ago. There is as much proof/evidence for him as there is for the Judeo/christian one i.e. fuck all!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 The water which now covers 3/4 of the Earth could cover 100% of the globe if you re-arrange the geography. The world's oceans and mountains were the result of the world wide flood. The world before the flood was vastly different, with the water under the crust of the Earth, which burst forth from the mid-oceanic ridges. That is why all the major mountain ranges are perfectly parallel to the mid-oceanic ridges from where the waters burst forth and the continents slid. Look it up.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist OK so the "pre flood world" a few thousand years ago was "vastly different" What evidence is there? The Andes (very) roughly follow the mid Pacific ridge, part of the way. The mid Atlantic ridge has NO MOUNTAINS parallel to them at all! Have you ever looked at an atlas? What of the Himalayas? If this is your "evidence" stick to Bible fiction and poor copies of the (Older) Gilgamesh (everyone agrees it's older Sunbeam, EVERYONE!)
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 The evidence the pre-flood world was different are the fossils, which show far greater diversity and size of modern day counter-parts. Just to name a few, a giant penguins, rhinos, beavers, insects of virtually every kind, all were far better off in the past, all around the world. A world wide event made it impossible for them to grow to such large proportions, and they ended up as fossils (due to the flood). I recommend the Seminar called "The Garden of Eden" that explains this
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
Comment removed
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
More proof that you don't understand earth history. The flood is a myth, for (at the time) illiterate peasants and now children. Many species of flora & fauna have evolved at different times to different conditions. (the Carboniferous Oxygen high gave us giant dragonflies and coal too) I can recommend Peter Pan as a guide to eternal youth. Where did Noah put: Freshwater fish, termites/deathwatch beetles, Polar bears etc.? How did he feed them? Did they eat each other? Or the Ark itself?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Another problem for you saddo's is recorded human history. Considering the age of cities like Damascus, it must have been in Noah's flood. Did no one notice?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 The planet is now covered 3/4 in water. If you raised the sea beds and eroded the mountains you could cover the entire world in water. The water was once under the crust of the Earth, as The Bible says "Psalm 24:2 for he founded the Earth upon the waters". 4400 years ago, "Genesis 7:11 all the fountains of the great deep were broken up", the water shot up the surface, which then triggered "Psalm 104:8 The mountains rose, the valleys sank down". The flood water is now the oceans.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Why, prey tell would I or anyone wish to "raise the sea beds & erode the mountains"? (Why bother with the sea beds at all you numpty). Are you suggesting then that within recent Human history there were no mountains (except Arrarat!) Where was the subterranean water stored? Where is your evidence for all of the aforementioned? What age are all of the Earth's mountains then? (all apparently the same eh?) Are you serious?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
The flood legends conspicuously always include a boat, all the animals in the world, and a family who are the last surviving people on the planet. Sound familiar? Besides, we know there was a world wide flood, which is the only explanation for the fossil record.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist No "boat", no beasties = no survival! Gosh that was hard to figure out!
Fossils= lots of seperate/distinct (mostly marine/fluvial) sedimentation episodes across over 500 million years, preserving hard body parts. So then sumbeam, do you reckon all fossils are of the same age? Why are most of them marine organisms? (Did the baby Jesus & his magic wand put cephalopod molluscs and trilobites on land?) This'll be the funniest yet, I can't wait!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Here's another one. Has it ever occurred to you that Marine fossils (bivalve/cetacean etc.) found in the Andes/JHimalayas etc. Were deposited when those peaks were marine sediments, deposited in boring horizontal beds below sea level, subsequently upthrust to form mountains? Now here's a thought, did the baby Jesus wave his little wand & A) move the continents around to form mountains? or B) flood the whole Earth with water that doesn't exist?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 I have no reason to call you names because I am not insecure in my beliefs. The Bible can be proved prophetically (predictions of the future), scientifically (how did Job know the earth was spinning in space, Job 26:7, 38:14), and using Archeology (we found Noah's Ark, Mount Sinai, the Red Sea Crossing, Sodom and Gomorrah, etc etc). The Bible is also always correct in its dates, locations, and historical assessment of nations. Face it, you just hate God. Your arguments fail.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Put, simply it never foretold anything. It is so vague in it's vocab anything can be "seen" in it,s thousands of racist, homophobic, chauvanist words. "Noah's ark"!!!!!!!! Anyone taking you even o.oooooo1% seriously until now is rolling on the floor, tears rolling down cheeks etc. Antway this Bible was once much larger (& smaller) It has been retranslated & edited so much that It cannot resemble it's original form, but you prefer it to scientific evidence?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist You aren't insecure in your absurd, laughable beliefs, that's the problem. You are plain wrong, you ignore evidence and opt for inaccurate, laughable, racist, sexist, homophobic rants in remnant form. Noah's ark??!!?? be serious (have you heard of Gilgamesh? The original fiction, ripped off badly by some idiot yonks ago.)
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 put your pride aside and look this stuff up.
gordonculp 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 The epic of gilgamesh, like other stories of the flood, are evidence that in the memory of mankind there was a worldwide event (a flood). There a literally flood legends in every major culture in history, the best explanation for which is they all attempted to explain what was clearly an event in their history. As time went on, those stories became legends, but The Bible preserved the truth of the event. Again, you are just a typical God hater who has no interest in truth.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist There are rivers/seas in every culture, ergo flood myths. That's that one done! anyhow sumbeam if by ark evidence you mean the Sino/Turk evangelical mission stuff, it's as funny/unreliable/absurd as a long line of others (one every 3 or so years) It's a rock formation/shrine or both (probabbly Armenian 4/5th century)
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
There is no such thing as evidence for the non-existence of anything. Genesis says when Adam and Eve sinned, the creation was cursed and the woman's trouble in childbirth began. Since you are a naturalist, you assume there is a natural explanation for her increase in pain (hips). The book of Revelation says when God restores the world," Revelation 21:4 "There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain" That means the original creation did not include pain, until Adam and Eve sinned.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
I do "good things" because I love God and love people. Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, and perhaps at first someone comes to the cross of Jesus for fear of Hell. While indeed that is shallow, God is even willing to accept us on that basis at first, for so great is His love and desire to save us. After salvation, the Spirit of God works with a Christian and moves them away from fear (because Christians are saved from Hell and thus no longer fear it) and then moved to Godly service.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist The kind of Bible swallowing brainwashed rubbish I'd expect from someone like you, The fact that all evidence points to no God at all doesn't bother you at all, and you are a programmed. hell fearing droid What of the deleted gospels? still no answer I see.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@Fishzero00001 There are no "deleted gospels". A deletion by nature assumes it was part of the canon, and then removed. The early church never accepted the gnostic gospels, where were forgeries of the 2nd and 3rd centuries, decades after the beginning of the church and the conception of the original gospels which the church had used since its beginning (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). The church recognized they were forgeries immediately, because they contradicted the OT and the NT.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist It all happened more than a century after the events described (NT) "Forgeries" strange choice or word! The whole thing is full of "contradictions" you fool Any Idiot basing their World view on that heap of fiction (no provenance, wrong dates/Emperors etc.) Rather than scientific rigiour/data/evidence has a major problem. So Did James & Mary M' have nothing to say at all? What's wrong with gnosticism? You just don't get it do you?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist So when did Eve's hips narrow? "beginning of wisdom"? When is yours going to begin?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Genesis 3:16 "To the woman He said, "I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children." If we shared a common ancestor with primates, we would indeed expect our birth issues to be similar, and they are not. Genesis explains why. As for the Guinea worm, as said prior, worms in their natural use are friendly to the environment, but as per Genesis 3:18 (2 verses later), the creation became hostile due to sin. You are a God hating bigot, to your own hurt
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist So then, after "Adam sinned" Women's pelvises narrowed (the reason for that "womens trouble"/childbirth) and then they were bipedal (couldn't be before you see, hips too wide) You Bible swallowers aren't at all good at figuring things out for yourselves. PS do you only do good things for fear of hell fire? Or do/can you empathise? If the only thing making you do good deeds is fear of hell, you're a bit sad & shallow. Another "funny" answer please!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
As you may or may not know, The Bible is clear in Genesis that pain, sickness, and death, and even woman's trouble in child birth, began after Adam sinned. God made a perfect world, and we ruined it. Worms are good for the environment, but due to the introduction of sin, have been misplaced from their natural use as God intended. Tumors and other diseases and tragic sicknesses are the result of a world fallen into decay and separated from God's original design.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist The Guinea worm is a truly hideous parasite, but anyone displaying such staggering sexist nonsense can also be excused for a high degree of ignorance! So no death for a while & original sin, the evidence for these assertions please. What of the deleted gospels etc. Did they contain any relevant words of God? & how would you know? You have a highly evolved brain, try using it.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist "Woman's trouble" There's a phrase from a man of the World if ever there was one! You must have noticed how our close primate relatives have very few childbirth issues, as well as not being bipedal. They also don't get haemorrhoids or backaches either, but apparently the first primate couple didn't have an untrustworthy male, so "Mrs Chimp" et al don't suffer"! Proves it then, Darwin must be wrong! Where's that baby Jesus & his magic wand?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
God designed all life able to adapt to their environment. Darwin's finches had different sized beaks, since God designed the finch to be able to adapt (within strict limitations) to survive. A beak changing size by no means demonstrates evolution; it remains a beak, and the bird a finch. This does not prove the finch came from a non-finch, or that birds came from non-birds. No new information was created. It just adapted an already existing trait. You are just deceived and hate God.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist The Human genome has at least 30,000 genes. Many genetic functions involve combinations of more than one, or several genes. This gives a cosmic number of possible functions, or phenotype variations to environments and changes therein.Birds and dinosaurs have a common ancestry, as do all mammals, indeed all organisms. Evidence for the above is abundant, verifiable and clear. Evidence for a "designer" is laughable and absent.
I cannot "hate" something that doesn't exist!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Your "designer" is a bit evil and incompetent.
OK so it designs the pretty buttercup, butterfly etc. What of the Guinea worm? or tumours? Why do people get backache, piles etc. (we haven't properly adapted to bipedalism, that's why it's also why childbirth is fairly tricky too. God's "own image" C'mon be serious!) And this Bible thing, was any part of "God's true word" in the bits history has edited out? (Mary's gospel etc). This'll be funny.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
Comment removed
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
Jesus' birth was foretold before His birth, He had students during his life called disciples who kept his teachings, and were eye witnesses to His death and resurrection. Evolution however is based on the lies of people who have been deceived to believe natural processes like natural selection are capable of doing things that have never been observed. Natural selection selects, thus it's name. It's like a DVD menu; simply selecting from what is already available never creates anything new!
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist Oh you poor sad fool. All things jesus related are 2nd /3rd hand hearsay at best (how much was written in his own lifetime? What provenance? authorship?) Heaps of evidence have been "observed" and selection is at a gene/macromolecular level, dictated by environmental change(s) and conditions. The best genes survive & replicate the best adapted survive. very simple really, put that silly old book away and try it.
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
Comment removed
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
This video proves how thoroughly indoctrinated our culture is to believe unscientific lies which are the foundation for the stupid evolution theory.
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist So the "Baby Jesus did it all" theory is better then?
I'll put it simply Evolution (through natural selection)= tons of evidence, all of which survives scrutiny Vs creation(Baby Jesus)ism= no evidence whatsoever.
So little sunbeam, who's "indoctrinated"?
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
Evolution has been so thoroughly debunked, but the evolutionists continue in their ignorance. They say things like "Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 165 million years", but science is defined by things we can test, repeat, and observe! You can not test, repeat, or observe millions of years! The Bible says dinosaurs we killed in a world wide flood, which is why we find them as fossils in the first place! God is real folks! Believe it!
LetsTalkChrist 1 year ago
@LetsTalkChrist How shall I put this? Where do I start? You're deeply ignorant.
"Test" Yep many times over, ALL valid, Proven. "Observe" (and comprehend, by proposing valid testabl/feasible models/hypotheses) ALL VALID and PROVEN again.
Whilst we cannot repeat X millions of years, we don't have to! Now run along and believe any other little fairy stories as you wish, but don't base anything sound or rational upon them, please! "Biblical dino's?" Nope!
Fishzero00001 1 year ago
Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 165 million years, fit that is your story!
gregrutz 1 year ago
Around 4:30 or so is absolutely hilarious. He rants for 3 minutes about how the textbooks don't enforce the law by teaching non-factual evidence (which is absolute bullshit, seeing as Hovind is too damn dumb to distinguish the difference between a scientific theory and a common theory) - then, immediately after, he goes and questions why creation isn't taught in science textbooks. What a hypocrite.
PSNBloodraid 1 year ago
spew
FUCKOFFYOURGAY 1 year ago
Emm, emm, Ain't it high time today that Lot's wife be petrified Sodium Chloride?
(Pensive)....
7olusegun 1 year ago
Kent Hovind has to be one of the most willingly stupid example of a Homo Sapien.
RedneckAtheist 1 year ago
The existence of god fails occam's razor. In my mind, no other argument is needed.
skakillers 1 year ago
@skakillers Really? When I look at the amazing complexity of the universe, stars, living cells, atoms, math, science, and etc.... God is the most logical reason for me. I cannot believe that all of this was just happenstance. Agnosticism makes more sense to me than atheism.
karozans 1 year ago
@karozans What you have to realize is that I meant this in a strictly explanatory sense. If we are to accept that god created the universe, then that does not really answer the question or provide any meaningful explanation, and begs the question of the exigence of god. A universe created without the interference of god is a simpler explanation, in terms of the further questions it raises. Therefore, it is the more acceptable answer using occam's razor.
skakillers 1 year ago
Yeah, books with lies should have it's pages torn out !!!
Might cut the bible down about 4 sentences though.
nolobede 1 year ago
The reason why evolutionism is considered the "science" of our race to this day is because our race strives off speculative perception back-boned by healthy and logical proven observations and facts. I almost can't even think straight when I hear this guy's voice, it is truly that bad. When you preach and lecture over a topic proned towards celebrating non-bias then don't use tone of voice to give alternative opinions an adolescent and humorous sense of figure you asshole.
talenta77 1 year ago
The only thing i agree with Hovind is when he said Ignorance is a bliss...
Nightmeare 1 year ago
Our mortality makes it that we need a form of belief even if it were to try to prove ourselves that there is no God and all the beautiful things in our world came to existence through a fortuitous process. Read Carnegie conversion to Darwinism and you should understand that it was very religious in nature. "I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only had I got rid of theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution.""
alexthasy 2 years ago
OWNED
zpsh1212 2 years ago
Hovind also pleaded 'no contest' to three charges of zoning violations, etc in 2006, was found guilty of lying about his assets and income in '96, renounced his US citizenship in '98, was found in '04 to be operating a business without a licence, and was charged with 89 counts of tax evasion, fraud, destroying records...
Had his passport and many firearms confiscated (along with $42,000 in loose cash around his home) in '02
and was found guilty of 58 counts in '06..
Great source of "truth."
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
One way of illustrating how most organised religions are, utterly unlike evolution, very good at "social control" would be to do the following. Go to Riyadh, stroll down any main road (near a police station) while drinking from a Jack Daniels bottle, holding another mans hand........ go on .Try it ! Because after all religion isn't a "social control mechanism" but a valid branch of science is, apparently...... Or are you wrong, yet again!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
4/5. Need I remind evolutionists everywhere, you received an invitation and joined the Catholic Church. Piltdown Pope, has validated evolution as being legitimate. By default, that invitation was accepted by all scientists and evolutionists. Catholics have a unique brand of Christianity, they ignore the words of Jesus Christ. Pope Ratzinger, totes a bent wooden crucifix to publiclly mock Jesus Christ. Science failed when it abandoned the truth & God to practice deception & Medieval Sorcery.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious more of the same bollocks from waytooobvious! Oh you mean proving we have a Heliocentric solar system? Some "lie" that.
Grow up , shut up or Fuck off or all 3!
Happy new year (or is it all an "Evolutionist" conspiracy?)
Ratzinger is(was) a Nazi, so what?
You've taken too much silly Christian happy medicine, go and lie down for a bit, until you're all better.
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001
What do these Ancient Empires have in common, Babylon, Aztecs, Incas, Roman, Greek, Lost City of Atlantis?
Really should have left the Science Department and spent some time in the other Liberal Arts. Art & History, photography and painting with an emphasis on self-portraits. Those Old Masters painted portraits with such detail. Hard to distinguish from a photo image converted to oil with Photo Art. Not just a slight resemblance, the splitting image, ROFLMAO!
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
"Ratzinger is(was) a Nazi, so what?"
Fishzero00001
His job after dropping the clothing of his early year Nazi regalia was changed to salesman for a Chemical Supply Company. Old Ratzinger the Piltdown Pope was #1 Salesman of the month for a gas called Cyanide which he supplied the Nazi Death Camps. SO WHAT? You sick Satanic Evil piece of shit.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious So you don't get irony either? So the Pope supports evolution, ergo all supporters of evolution are Papist (!?!?) Do you recall a similar phrase about swans being white? Probably not, as it isn't insane Biblical nonsense for paranoid idiots. The Papacy is as corrupt and wrong as any other organised religious group, including yours, anyway Piltdown man is very very old news. Oh and Stalin was responsible for far more deaths, probably 3 times as many, so your point is.....?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001
No question about it Stalin tops the list of Genocidal Maniacs, Mao and Hitler placing a distant 2nd and 3rd. Those 3 men each imported the identical 2 part strategy to ensure the success of the genocide they later accomplish. First, they induced the general population to think of themselves as an animals not human beings (integrate evolution into education). Second, sway society to adopt a system of time measured by a geologic timeline verses Religious Reference Books. cont..
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Each Genocidal Maniac adopted the same highly effective strategy. Condition society for slaughter, then execute the plan. Those 3 genocidal events, were highly orchestrated. Although textbooks don't reveal it, the facts & historians do. Example, Israel attacked US Naval Ship Liberty. LBJ was ballistic they didn't sink it. 1962 CIA proposed Operation Northwoods. A plan to disguise as Cubans attack r own bases to garner support for a Cuban War. JFK, refused & fired his Jt. Chief.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious Of course you are aware that the vast majority of Christians as well as devotees of other religions have no problem with evolution.
People who (try to) claim it is a social control mechanism merely display their paranoia. Happy new year all.
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Bullshit. I'm Christian and I have many problems with it. It is merely where you stand.
zpsh1212 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious Society doesn't give a toss about geological or Biblical timescales, apathy is king thesedays. Each example you cite is a product of nationalism, only a sufferer of a paranoid psychosis could begin to swallow the line you propose! I cannot recall Hitler refering to the "German/Aryan people(s)" as "animals" at any point or to the Palaezoic (ditto Stalin etc.) please cite where they did, or admit you got it wrong, oh, and check your medication too
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001
get off your lazy Nazi ass and do your own homework. Apparently, the author if the post in the Oxford Dictionary was also able to locate ample number of sources to write what they did regarding the word race. I'll post that as the only assistance to you doing your own homework.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
"Although ideas of race are centuries old, it was not until the 19th century that attempts to systematize racial divisions were made. Ideas of supposed racial superiority and social Darwinism reached their culmination in Nazi ideology of the 1930s and gave pseudoscientific justification to policies and attitudes of discrimination, exploitation, slavery, and extermination...."
- Oxford Dictionary
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious Plain wrong. One race Homo sapiens. "Social Darwinism" is a phrase that has nothing to do with evolution whatsoever (Nazi's misunderstood "Fitness" as you do. Nothing at all to do with strength, superiority etc. just the ability to produce successful, breeding offspring)
With our highly evolved brains we can empathise, so we don't (all) act like Stalin as we know it's not nice, we know what it'd feel like, quotes in context please.
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001 Long before messers Hitler (who believed in God) & Stalin etc. Ghengis Khan, Darius and Alexander all regarded their opponents as "inferior" and "not (as) worthy" as their own forces/peoples but from an imperialist/Nationalist perspective. Your silly paranoid efforts don't relate to evolution at all!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001
And, Hitler adopted the Jesuit 5th Oath for his SS. What was he thinking Jesuits had been kicked out of every Country in Europe. History of the Jesuits, their history infected the last 3 Centuries.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious So, I'm a Jewish atheist Catholic? So all the "evidence" is wrong, and you are correct? And you're not paranoid? You should read some science books (have a little picture of a protestant baby Jesus looking down on you, if it helps) and take a few pills!
PS science exposed Piltdown man as a crude fraud, not idiot Christians, because they've got so much "evidence" for Jesus.............Haven't they?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Any of the leaders of modern history display a remarkable resemblance or in fact, the splitting image of some ancient familiar faces? You'll recognize some of them eventually hahahahaha, been engrossed with all your "science" and didn't spend time looking at art, reading literature, emphasis on the classics. Figured out why never combine art science Museums together. Fucking scientists wouldn't recognize their own ass from a hole in the wall. Only images recognized, be of overrated scientists.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
3/5. July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastic letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). As he delivered his historical letter, the press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope's recent acknowledgment of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division that has existed. Evolutionists just got an invitation to the Catholic Church, they can't refuse.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2/5. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
1/5. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Restating the obvious question, that separates the bull from bullshit. Repeatable results that give the precise location within an event we can safely assume are where science has demonstrated & provided "irrefutable evidence" associated with all locations of absolute truth. In the theory of evolution, where is that point? Shame, science has found several routes to locations of truth yet fails to identify God.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
What is the distance science refers to when weak become strong fields and the point where a constant current is no longer constant. Does science provide a precise location for either of those events? If it can and is repeatable then we can safely assume that science has found a point of truth. Matter of fact, I am positive science can demonstrate having found several points of truth. Where is that point in evolution so it can legitimately be taught as fact?
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious OK so who wrote capter 3 of Exodus? On what date? Where? What "proof" do you have of this?
You think you are so smart, you're an angry sad little schoolboy.
PS Evolution explains "life" and it's purpose........... Reproduction! That's it Waytooobvious. Do you understand the concept of "evidence"?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Anthropology really should refine not just to study ancient civilizations, but focus on how ancient scientists resemble the oblivious bonehead scientists today. Morons think is modern science is advanced yet has not achieved what ancient science did. Of course they did mix a lot of Sorcery with theirs. We got evolution 150+ yrs ago, they got it introduced by science about 150 before their demise too. Followed by the associated 1014 yr sentence to Hell, this run the Hell penalty is eternity.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@Fishzero00001
The question you should be asking yourself is why the Piltdown Pope was able to address the July 2009 G8 Conference? G8 is the Governing Board of the United Nations. He was not there as a Conscientious Objector, delivering a speech. Piltdown Pope did not request he DIRECTED them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral Authority (Anti-Christ).
Go back to sleep, Atheists are held in the same regard as Christians, Muslims & Jews - Your choice is God or Satan.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
"A law differs from a scientific theory in that it does not posit a mechanism or explanation of phenomena: it is merely a distillation of the results of repeated observation. As such, a law is limited in applicability to circumstances resembling those already observed, and is often found to be false when extrapolated. Ohm's law only applies to constant currents, Newton's law of universal gravitation only applies in weak gravitational fields"
-toudiloony
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
All creationist videos deserve a one star votebot.
amorphousguy 2 years ago
Enjoy your jail time dipshit.
zionofwestern 2 years ago
wimp(dot)com/niceinfo/ that proves that evolution is real and that this is a load of crap
kazooga1234 2 years ago
brainwashed are we
chedachzballz 2 years ago
if u dont believe in evolution then there is something wrong with u wne its a proven fact i sware just watch wimp(dot)com/niceinfo it proves it its scientfic evidence that proves we are monkeys and if u dont like being a monkey tough u r a monkey
kazooga1234 2 years ago
Thank you - you took the words right out of my mouth. ;-) But don't worry. Given enough time and patience, someone will be able to explain how humans evolved in a language you can follow.
BailiffQuimby 2 years ago
well i accually found a link that would do that but they r all so stupid they cant even go to the link its wimp(dot)com/niceinfo
kazooga1234 2 years ago
if u think that i am brainwashed i believe in the facts and not some invisible man in the sky so think about that b4 u comment and watch the facts
kazooga1234 2 years ago
Noel Dilly (1992) identified some pterobranchs (organisms with some similarities to some graptolites.)
Graptolites (numerous distinct species have been identified, they are very good guide fossils) have been extinct for well over 300 million years. Yet again the Idiot liar/fraudster deliberately tries to confuse the gullible!
Many living speciesare closely related to or resemble extinct species, I.e. Horseshoe crabs and Trilobites. This clearly DOESN'T mean trilobites AREN'T EXTINCT!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Haekel a "convicted fraudster" eh?
takes one to know one!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
So, Abortion (Fuck all to do with evolution by the way!) The main offender then, the cause of 90%+ of the removal of fertilised "viable" eggs (embryos if you will) from the womb, or failure to implant must be the creator God then!
"Baby Jesus, Worlds Biggest Abortionist"
quite a headline
(what i mean by this is the fact that over 9/10 fertilised eggs are indeed "flushed out" by the menstral cycle, due to chemical/hormonal messages not getting through in enough time)
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
not to mention that its mostly chirstains that end up needing to get abortions and the 1s that dont get the abortions end up having babys when they r 16 sometimes younger
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"Money is more important than truth" according to "some people" .......Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Hovind's target audience are gullible christians to start with (using, as they do, as a starting point a set of contradictory books of unknown provenance/authorship edited and mistranslated to oblivion!) Note how he quotes short phrases from a textbook to make it appear contradictory (ignoring 99%+ of the whole verifiable text as he does so.) Contradictions abound in the Bible, but they AREN'T verified by the remainder of the text. Can you spot the key difference?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Hovind (convicted criminal) is wrong on so many issues, it is difficult to know where to begin. The complete stratigraphic column isn't found anywhere, but it doesn't take a genius to put together a jijsaw! His assertion that "all the fossils are the same age" isn't backed up by any evidence (because it's laughable nonsense!) Way up criteria conformities/unconformities and palaeoclimate-palaoenvironmental evidence, long before isotope data are all used to "date" beds, not just fossils!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
"Money is the root of all evil"? Historically, money has taken many forms including trinkets, beads, feathers, precious metals and printed paper. Crossing a desert with a briefcase containing $5,000 dollars, what is the value of a bottle of water that could save your life? Money provides a convenient means of economic exchange. The amount we are willing to pay determined by the level of value (demand) for the product or service (supply). What determines abundance, scarcity or shortages?
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Where on the bullshit timeline of evolution does man display free will? This will, that will, her will, his will, my will or Thy Will be done on earth as it is in Heaven? Man was created & granted free will. With that, the choice to use it had to exist. No option to use it, is Not free will. Clearly, God had second thoughts regarding having even created us. If not for Noah and Moses, man would have ceased to exist. Failure 101, free will failure and you worship the first to have failed.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Nine innocent letters from the English language combine to form the word deception. Deception is the very essence of Evil. At some point, most everyone has been a victim of deception. Not a pleasant feeling to have been tricked, deceived or deliberately left in the dark. Most did not enjoy being left in the dark in their personal or business lives, then why opt for ignorance in one's spiritual life. What is the first rule of war? Know your enemy?
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Ever noticed the similarities between JC and Mythras? Or Mary and Aphrodite? Lots of Biblical fiction derives from earler religious bunk, or hadn't you noticed?
Why not ask your Baby Jesus if i'm genuine or not, oh, and ask why his Dad allowed the Holocaust too while you're at it!
Was he on a "Miracle Holiday" at the time? Or are water into wine, bush burning, child sacrifice and red Sea parting etc. all he does?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
The Satanic Lullaby aka the conscious choice to remain ignorant. Cruise Control, Air Bags, Automatic Climate Control are topics discussed in a Owners Manual for a car. Go back 100 years & those topics would sound like science fiction. You would be telling the truth, but few any would believe those systems were possible.
Fishzero, Dr of Deception. I imagine the number of paragraphs you have read in the Bible is less then 50. Half assed effort to read the Bible then post half witted comments.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
As I clearly stated earlier i read it ALL and it made no sense, naieve tosh for the gullible, in an age before modern science for medieval peasants to believe, you too apparently! I'm off with some fictional students on a fictitious field trip so I won't be around to watch you repeat crap to yourself and evade difficult questions. Read more hilarity from you in a few weeks Mr "pottymouth" oddball
PS I'm also Jewish (by birth) and atheist by common sense and, a "Nazi" according to you!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
My Jewish friends believe in God and that with God all things are possible. Entirely possible then that God knew the future when He made His covenant. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not mutually exclusive entities. Belief in any one member of the Holy Trinity automatically picks up the Whole. Through Him With Him In Him by the Unity of His Holy Spirit all glory and honor are yours forever and ever. The consecration of the Christ when He became Jesus Christ. "have you not known Me Philip?.."
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
A legal theme that runs throughout the Bible with constant references to "by who's authority" The Pharaoh was smug having reasoned God had given His Word and He would never again destroy using a flood. God kept His Word, the Red Sea never left it's banks. arkdiscovery. com provides several photos and a 27 minute video that provides compelling evidence they have discovered the location of the crossing. Remnants of Chariots, weapons, bones etc. it's worth considering their data.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Perhaps if you read the Bible with some humility instead of your smug know it all attitude you would better comprehend what is written.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
as for your water turning into wine criss angel can do that so does that mean hes jesus or god it was accually water into beer u can go check that out if u havent seen it its uploaded on youtube
kazooga1234 2 years ago
Voltaire?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Fishzero00001 <-------------- Claims to be a PhD, makes no reference to a Doctoral Thesis and there is an obvious difference in how a PhD addresses a topic verses Fish offering conclusions based on inconclusive evidence that does not meet the standard of irrefutable evidence. Read the statements made by true PhD scientists, they read much differently then those written by Fishthezero who is a fraud.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
I must retain a degree of anonymity you fool (Real names are not used, in case you hadn't noticed) I address the topic as one should. In short, Evolution through NS is as proven as any theory can be whereas rants about pyschics, mediums, conspiracies and satanism, all from the same barking source have never and will, never be credible or withstand controlled test conditions. What are your O levels in?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
What is your stance then Wonkyobvious?
Are you a creationist? A pseudopsychic? or just deeply sad and misinformed?
If you are uniting diverse strands then under what title/thesis/hypothesis? If Darwin = wrong, then what in your shockingly limited, angry little sphere = truth?
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
For the reasons described earlier I cannot give too much detail about my thesis (I don't want twats like you figuring out my name/address) but it concerned , the origin of life on Earth and the Cambrain explosion. My work has been referred to by Bill Bryson and Richard Dawkins. I could be 6' tall, ginger and French or a 4' bald transsexual, you'll never know!
What of you? (My students find you very amusing, more please!)
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be a miracle, so many conditions which would have to been satisfied to get it going."
- Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winning biochemist
My stance is the one shared by honest men. The rest can rationalize and justify their irrational behavior. Liars and frauds like you Fishzero. You are not a PhD, you are a liar.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Piltdown Man is one of a series of frauds that were used to manipulate public opinion. What I have discovered is there are three distinct camps. Those who promote an agenda based on fraud and misrepresentation of fact, those who seek to discover the truth with an agenda to reveal fraud and a large group of oblivious with the same agenda as a domestic cow. Those promoting fraud label those exposing fraud as conspiracy theorists and the oblivious treat honesty as an inconvenient option.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Calm down Sugarplum! Fraud is a big word you know. That quote from the discredited "Oops, I'd better retract my comment about inteligence and race" Crick is a repeat from you, as irrelevant now as it was last time, (He's made lots of controversial comments in his time).
Is your Paranoia being treated? If so, I'd get a medication review, and quickly!
Fishzero00001 2 years ago
Piltdown Man was just a fraud, and a bad o