The difference between pi's story and the story of religion is that it does make a difference to me whether my beliefs about god and the universe are valid.
it does? martel's first quetion in 'reading group guide' asks how it may have affected the readers religious beliefs. i would like to analyse it through the eyes of atheists and agnostics because i find harder because i already have a 'religion'. so if i may ask, how?
Interesting concept. Couldn't take the leap of faith though, argument had some critical flaws. It's kind of ironic that he referenced the world trade center as an argument for believing in god. I'm sure all those people didn't have to jump out of the windows and plummet to their death had it not been for terrorists who are waging a war against the west in the name of their religion. Yeah, I guess having a normal day at the office wouldn't make for an exciting story *sarcasm.
@shili12000 You should be eaten by Richard Parker. But congratulations on the successful rhyme; y'should turn it into a poem about Twilight or something.
regarding my last sentence, i should have said, don't get hung up on small details in a book about God.
also, he could have fabricated the second story simply to challenge the thought process of the interviewers, who to me were symbolic of all people who choose not to expand their boundaries of thought, and refuse miracles as a part of their lives. his whole point of the book is there are two ways to look at life: dry factuality, or magic. life is all how you interpret it, as is the book.
Yann Martel, I did interpret the book as you said, that the story with the animals was allegorical and referred to the story without animals. Because, if Pi had these two stories in mind, he would need a motivation to invent one. His motivation to invent the story with animals is perfectly simple... he wants to convince himself that his story was less horrible and more interesting. It would make no sense for his character to fabricate the story without animals.
I believe this way of reading the book is better than the interpretation you apparently intended. And I choose to believe that it is the true interpretation because it is the better one.
that's not what he meant, he left it open. His whole point is that it is open, he wants you to make the decision as to which actually happened, and to contemplate why you chose what you chose. the reason he would fabricate the human story is simply because that was the whole point of the book and he had to put it in. its what ties everything together to leave you guessing, and to leave it unfinished with room for philosophical discussion. don't think too literally in a book about God
Is he saying that people will say that the "true story" is the one with the people on the lifeboat, or is HE saying that "in fact," the true story is the one with human survivors?
An amazing book. Very nice to hear the author's idea of the "two stories". A thought it was a really scary and horrible ending because you don't know if Pi was in the lifeboat with the animals or in fact with humans - which would make it all even more tragic. Truly a masterpiece!
This book was so unbelievable (lie!!) After I figured I was reading the mother of all FICTIONS, I was completed bored and nonchalant! He has what people call an overactive imagination, along with religious issues.
Yeah, Canadian Canon for sure. But how well does it stand up to Moby Dick, or Old Man in the Ocean of Apathy Re-born, or Oryx and Crake. It's interesting how Yann discusses how people want to tell the story; is it the boy and the
this book is a knockoff of "max and the cats".
revolution94ful 11 months ago
The difference between pi's story and the story of religion is that it does make a difference to me whether my beliefs about god and the universe are valid.
BibleStudyAtheist 1 year ago
@BibleStudyAtheist
The point he's trying to make is that you can't know anyway, and until you die the truth of the matter is irrelevant.
If you need to guess(as we do, really) you might as well keep an open mind and hope for something greater.
ogloosh 9 months ago
@BibleStudyAtheist
it does? martel's first quetion in 'reading group guide' asks how it may have affected the readers religious beliefs. i would like to analyse it through the eyes of atheists and agnostics because i find harder because i already have a 'religion'. so if i may ask, how?
laloca787894 7 months ago
Interesting concept. Couldn't take the leap of faith though, argument had some critical flaws. It's kind of ironic that he referenced the world trade center as an argument for believing in god. I'm sure all those people didn't have to jump out of the windows and plummet to their death had it not been for terrorists who are waging a war against the west in the name of their religion. Yeah, I guess having a normal day at the office wouldn't make for an exciting story *sarcasm.
bleakreserve 1 year ago
i stopped this book halfway and flung it away.
shili12000 1 year ago
@shili12000 You should be eaten by Richard Parker. But congratulations on the successful rhyme; y'should turn it into a poem about Twilight or something.
aquamarine1515 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my Life of Pi video on my channel and subscribe
RogerAndThePear38 1 year ago
Me and my mom read this book we both loved it. My went on to say it was one of her favorite books of all time.
rougejaw 1 year ago
Such a good book!
BehindTheSea29 2 years ago
regarding my last sentence, i should have said, don't get hung up on small details in a book about God.
also, he could have fabricated the second story simply to challenge the thought process of the interviewers, who to me were symbolic of all people who choose not to expand their boundaries of thought, and refuse miracles as a part of their lives. his whole point of the book is there are two ways to look at life: dry factuality, or magic. life is all how you interpret it, as is the book.
BAY868 2 years ago
Yann Martel, I did interpret the book as you said, that the story with the animals was allegorical and referred to the story without animals. Because, if Pi had these two stories in mind, he would need a motivation to invent one. His motivation to invent the story with animals is perfectly simple... he wants to convince himself that his story was less horrible and more interesting. It would make no sense for his character to fabricate the story without animals.
archaist 2 years ago
I believe this way of reading the book is better than the interpretation you apparently intended. And I choose to believe that it is the true interpretation because it is the better one.
archaist 2 years ago
that's not what he meant, he left it open. His whole point is that it is open, he wants you to make the decision as to which actually happened, and to contemplate why you chose what you chose. the reason he would fabricate the human story is simply because that was the whole point of the book and he had to put it in. its what ties everything together to leave you guessing, and to leave it unfinished with room for philosophical discussion. don't think too literally in a book about God
BAY868 2 years ago
Thanks for the upload!
mark1138 2 years ago
A Royal Bengal Tiger....great choice!
chrisgelb 2 years ago
IT'S FICTION.
MugLug40 2 years ago
Is he saying that people will say that the "true story" is the one with the people on the lifeboat, or is HE saying that "in fact," the true story is the one with human survivors?
kayjay56 2 years ago
They'll say it's the BETTER story.
xOTHisLove 2 years ago
An amazing book. Very nice to hear the author's idea of the "two stories". A thought it was a really scary and horrible ending because you don't know if Pi was in the lifeboat with the animals or in fact with humans - which would make it all even more tragic. Truly a masterpiece!
KristofferAppel 2 years ago
yeah , but still ...
if in fact his mother was on the boat
with him ... why was he saying throughout
the whole part when the orange-utan was
with him , stuff like ...
"I've lost my whole family" , "I wish mother
was with me" , etc.
MilicaVV 2 years ago
totally recommend this book.......have to read it again.......interesting twist
tomatoflower78 3 years ago
this is one of my favourite books ever
krwcarolina 3 years ago
great interview about the value of believing
happyearthmama 3 years ago
Does anyone know the source of this interview? Interviewer/program? Pllelealaseee
leeshore 3 years ago
amaaaaaaaazing book!
Mrl0101 3 years ago
This book was so unbelievable (lie!!) After I figured I was reading the mother of all FICTIONS, I was completed bored and nonchalant! He has what people call an overactive imagination, along with religious issues.
tajhani 3 years ago
Boring book wanted to kill myself sorry everyone but its true
GamerForLifePSthree 3 years ago
That book was amazing! Just finished reading it yesterday. Yann's a masterrr! haha
perucha8291 4 years ago
I love this book!
24thingstodo 4 years ago 2
(that's how a semi-colon SHOULD be used)
woodensaw 4 years ago
Yeah, Canadian Canon for sure. But how well does it stand up to Moby Dick, or Old Man in the Ocean of Apathy Re-born, or Oryx and Crake. It's interesting how Yann discusses how people want to tell the story; is it the boy and the
woodensaw 4 years ago
I happen to believe the first story. Very good book.
Arsondogg 4 years ago
I thought yann was a girl's name, lol.
studmuffffffin 4 years ago
You are a moron.
woodensaw 4 years ago
Yeah.
studmuffffffin 4 years ago
amazing book...just finished reading it
lionstrong101 4 years ago
I agree with you completely. I instantly hooked by it. Pressure is on poor Yann to top himself now. Tough job!
writerly 4 years ago 2
That book is so f'n brilliant.
Syncopatedrythm 4 years ago