Added: 2 years ago
From: universeswaminarayan
Views: 13,378
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • anuj , himraj you are fake suckers.

    Ahmedabad, bochsan, vadatal, SMVS - You all goons and thugs are bloody slaves of British and Christian missionaries. Sreeman shajanad got ahmdadad temples land in gift of slavery of Britishers.

    This old fellow is perfect peace of example of Muslim king Shahjanhan, who kick out from his own son Jahangir, poor old fellow, and so pity. Lord Krishan is & only One god, sadhu sahjanada (swaminarayan) is not god ever.He was Thug.

    Hare Krishna Hare Rama

  • @25Sunnylove listen mate....when u listen to Jain samprayaday they say Krishna is in Hell....i dont believe it but they are ignorant, just like U r...stop spreading hatered and insulting lord Swaminarayan....i could have used a lot worst words for u, and lord ram and krishna, than what you have used for my god but i wont come down to your level.....with this attitude lord ram and krishna will throw u to hell themselve......js

  • @anujnz go to hell you gang thug mafia.

  • Hare Krishna Hare Krishna

    Krishna Krishna Hare Hare

    Hare Rama Hare Rama

    Rama Rama Hare Hare

  • Also in Gunatitanand Swami ni vato (original)..

    Bhagwan na svarupnu nirupan karta toh Maharajne avde, ka toh Gopalanand Swami jeva ne avde, pan bija koine avde nai... Vato 2/67.

  • Also please read Shukanand Swami ni vaat 17...

    Ane vari em vat kari je, je katha, varta, bhajan, smaran eh adik je je kriya kariye chiye teh sarve ne Shriji Maharaj joi rahya che ne Akshardhamna mukt tatha Gopalanand Swami ne aaghar Maharaj vat kare che je eh bahu saru kare che...

    Also vaat 18 declares greatness of Gopalanand Swami.

  • @MultiHimraj 1.one of my comment I mention about vadatal gyanbagh entrance wall only because I believe that that place is far better worth to written Shikshapatree not to accused anyone, none of religions, sectors, samraydays are untouched with various allegations n court cases, I not mention other cases, I said I respect acharya, its up to me what should I do it or not.i already said its not to show you, no necessary to do it.

  • @MultiHimraj 2.There are thousand of videos on youtube against Hinduism, swaminarayan, BPAS n other, I am neither intent to clarify any one, I just putting my views. You all ready with written texts while I am only comment on your comment, so I have no agenda, I watch video, n than I read comments so I puts my views.

  • Te paap ne vishe punya ni buddhi thaye,ne sadhu ne vishe asadhuni budhi thaay,Pachi droha thaay, paachi teno jeev nash thaay. Evu eh che,mateh varamvaar kevanu tatparya shu che?Toh eke vaaat haiya mah rakhine koi divas eh marghe charvu nahi.Ne eni (Dev (murti), acharya, sant, haribhakt) toh puja karvi nikarva haath jorva.Pan avgun toh nahij levo eh amaaro siddhant hato the kahyo.Sadhu ni,Mandir ni,acharya ni ne satsangi ni seva karvi toh vruddhi pamaay.Ne droh thaiye toh jeev no nash thaiye.

  • @MultiHimraj You said you are here to open eyes of Mumuksha, that’s great n noble work. Than whay not start from home! charity begins home. Again my humble request that what ever you wrote on here youtube why not shows all fact of Junaghar temple n acharya, n remove "Akshar Brahm", "Mul Akshar murti" types of “Drohi” titles from every where?

  • Just b4 2 months I visited junaghar, why not your own acharyas remove that “Drohi” words from each n every stone of temple, from Sabha mandap, are atlest remove “akshar Brahm” from official website?

  • @MultiHimraj You said my reference of book is false, while I wrote from book.there is no judge who decide whose saying right n whose wrong,so even I put other reference of that you denied n said its all false,even i put swamini vato or other bhajan, you said all false.obviously you not ready to listen.here no one can check facts so easy to denied. n no way to prove it. So hopefully you told own gadi website n temple which is well seen from anyone. no sense of making only allegations!

  • @MultiHimraj i have no hard feeling for neither you nor others. i just share my views only.

  • You sure your not blind in hate? Look at your comments. Full of hate. Im simply putting up proof from the shastras and you started talking about Acharyas and bad mouthing them. You need to read Gunatitanand Swamis vatos. In there it clearly states Acharya no avgun na levo.... In vaat 112 of Prakran 5 of Gunatitanand swami’s vaato:Ane acharya Adhik charno avgun ave e motu paap che.Bija toh anek swabhav hoye, paan ae paapnu mool che...continued...

  • Gadhadharanand case has nothing to do with Upasna. Just like how BAPS killed to build Gondal Mandir as well as Manibhai they killed for relaying truth. Also why do you talk about these Acharyas now? BEfore you said you respect them? Now you show your truth. Also why do you talk of sex scandals? What about your BAPS BHUJ mandir? The sadhus have run away with women and today live on Sukhpur Road in Divya Brahmlok Ashram'. Nautam Swmai episode ...he agrees he was paid by money from BAPS.

  • Why are you talking about cort case and this and that? I talk of scriptures. When debating..talk about shastras of the Sampradai of Bhagvan Swaminarayan. Not court case. That will not give kalyaan. You may not oray to your BAPS gurus as God but...your BAPS sanstha like i shown with proof below from your publication of 'siddhantsaar' proves it does.

  • Im not saying in the Supreme court. Your English does not even make sense. Speak in Gujarati. No one has appointed me. Ive appointed myself to spread truth. How am i spreading hatred? Im quoting and referencing from the shastras of Bhagvan Swaminarayan. Why do you not like that? As a bhakt you should.

  • Also on page 557 it says... "tyare koie kahyu je Hai Swami! Tamo jameen leva mateh prayaas karo cho pan Gadhada ma jameen malti nathi. Ne raja e pan apne apva mateh bandhi kari che to apane kyathi malshe? Tyare pragat Purshottam Narayan kahe je 'jo raja jameen nahi ape to chevte amo anyathakartu shakti vaprine jameen laien mandir karshu ne jo vadhare aada avshe to teno pasej karavsu. Atyare amrau dharyu thay che. Tek kon na padi shake tem che?

  • Also on page 29 of a BAPS publication it says "bhakt vatsal Bhagvan Purushottam Narayan ah lokma anya svarup dhari ne gurjar desh Maherav game krushikul ma Dhoribhai na bhuvan ma Hetba thaki pradurbhaav thata hata". Also on page 107: " Avi rite cha hetu mateh Purshottam Narayan e Akshardham ne mukto sathe Maharaj pote alok ma satsang na madhya ma janm dharan kari ne varnivesh dharan kari sadhu thai Yagnapurush nam dharan karyu".

  • In a book by BAPS called 'Siddhantsaar' on page 344 talks on Shastriji being Purna Purshottam. This is what it states: "jyare vadtal thi swamijinu akshar purshottam shudh sarvopari sampradai nu stapan karva nikarya tyare harikrishna maharaj tatha lakshminarayan eh traney jan swamini sevama haajar raheta tethi parcha ne aishvaria no to paaraj nohto." Also on page 8 it says "Pratyaksh Purshottam Swami Shri Yagnapurushdasjie baki rahelu kam puru karyu".

  • WHY DONT YOU ACCEPT MANY OF THE NAND SANTOS VATOS?

    WHY DONT YOU ACCEPT SARVAMANGAL STOTRA OR NAMAVLI?

    YOU SAY YOU RESPECT ACHARYAS.. THEN WHY NOT FOLLOW THEM?

    WHY NOT FOLLOW SHIKSHAPATRI SHLOKS LIKE 41, 62 ETC?

    WHY NOT FOLLOW THE BHASHYA OF SUCH SHLOKS BY SHATANAND SWAMI YET QUOTE FROM ONLY SOME OF HIS WORKS?

  • WHY DOES PRAMUKH SWAMI SIT ON GOLDEN CHAIRS?? GUNATITANAND SWAMI NEVER DID. EVEN THOUGH HE COULD HAVE. YOU THINK BHAKTOS DIDNT OFFER HIM ALSO OR WISHED FOR HIM TO SIT ON SUCH? MY GURU DOESNT.

    WHY DOES HE EAT FROM A METAL PLATE? SWAMINARAYAN SANTO SHOULDNT. MY GURU DOESNT.

    WHY FOLLOW WHAT YOUR BAPA SAYS YET NOT FOLLOW THE SHASTRO LIKE EYE WITNESS ACCOUNTS SUCH AS THOSE WRITTEN BY PARSHAD MONA BHAGAT?

    WHY DONT YOU FOLLOW SATSANGI JIVAN SCRIPTURE SUCH AS 4.46.23. Shriharidigvijay 41/65.

  • WHERE IS YOUR GURU SAID TO BE MUL AKSHAR?

    WHICH SCRIPTURE DOES IT STATE THERE WILL BE A PARAMPARA OF MUL AKSHARS?

    IF ALL YOUR PARAMPARA WAS MUL AKSHAR THEN WHICH ONE WAS MUL AKSHAR WHEN ALL WERE PRESENT ON EARTH ALTOGETHER? ALL THREE?

    WHERE IS THAT IN SCRIPTURES?

    WHY DONT YOU FOLLOW PURSHOTTAM PRAKASH PRAKRAN 37+ ONWARDS, HARILILAMRUT, KALYAN NIRNAY AND MANY OTHER SCRIPTURES (WHICH YOU DONT QUOTE FROM AND NEITHER FOLLOW) YET YOU LIKE TO QUOTE FROM IT?

    WHY DONT YOU FOLLOW DESH VIBHAGH LEKH??

  • I don tsay Gunatitanand Swami was not given diksha by Bhagvan Swaminarayan. But the Harililakalpatru granth you states... the so called shloks are not in the original text. These 8 shloks are written by BAPS. You are lying as Harililakalpatru in Vadtal is not yet published. Only the sankshipt is and it has not such shloks. So why do you lie? Scan and put on a webpage for all to see then?

  • bhagwan saunu bhalu karo.

  • 3.I can’t put itwebsite link here so I put it there path

    Junaghar website > About Smaryaday > Saint & devotes > first paragraph “Shri Gunatitanand Swami - Known as Akshar Brahm, was a prominent Saint, who has given the most valuable contribution for the wide spread of the Swaminarayan Sampraday (Holy Fellowship). ..

  • 2.so you think all Archaryas n people of junaghar are not understandable, n since hundred years not make any change, its not possible. If you denied truth, its ok, no hard feeling or no forced you. Its up to you…kindly visit vadtal gadi own official website of Junaghr Temple , if you think they all are wrong, than nothing left to say anymore....

  • 1.Respecting Acharya means its not to show you…n no need what other think of it, its there believe to respect other acharya..neither Shashtri Narayan Swarupdas nor Shahsri yangpurush das proclaim or worshiped are as bhagwan or God, its presume only….there are murtis of whole guru parmpara, treated as saint only not Bhagwan or god at all...

  • if you respected the Acharyas... you would follow them. Not agreeing to them cant be said to be respecting them. Also about Yagnapurshdasji being called Bhagvan.. BAPS themselves say this no one else. Its in their own publications. Its not assumed. Read for yourself. There are no changes in the Swaminarayan Sampradai. We have all teh nand santos handwritten scriptures. This is the excuses you give as you have to follow the truth hahah. How sad.

  • Shri Swaminarayano Vijaytetram.

  • Ive spoken to ISKON and using the Skand Purans Vasudev Mahatmyam Adhyay 18 and proved them wrong in their belief of Swaminarayan Bhagvan not being Bhagvan. They had no words left to say. Also Swaminarayan mat khandan of Dayanand Sarasvati was long proven wrong by Harijivandasji Shastri of Vadtal.That is why today their sampraday cannot back up what they follow.This is not hate campaign. It is declaring the vijay of Bhagvan Swaminarayan. Where truth is established from the word of Shriji Maharaj.

  • Also on walls of Vadtal Aksharbhuvan etc... it was written by Mani bhai a bhagat of BAPS who left BAPS and exposed them. He was then murdered by them. Nothing wrong in hounouring and pujan of sant. But bathing them and having statues made of them is not the custom of Bhagvan Swaminarayan. Nor is a Gunatit parampara mentioned in any scripture. We are not wasting time...we are opening the eyes of many mumukshus and protecting dharm.

  • That adhyay has only 49 Shloks and is the original one by Adi Acharya Raghuvirji Maharaj and Achintyanand Bramchari. In this adhyay there are shlok 49 in total. After Shlok 45.. from shlok 47- 54 it starts "Shri Shukanand Uvach" and his talk. None of what B.A.P.S put is within it. Also, the main scripture itself is with Acharya maharaj then how did B.A.P.S get its so called version from? The full version is ready to be published again anyway and people can read for themselves the truth.

  • It was made by the help of a sheth of Mumbai called Sheth Maneklal Chunilal. This person is also described in the B.A.P.S monthly sandesh October 2010 page number 28. The original one does not even have Shriji Maharaj giving Mulji Sharma diksha in Dabhan so what to talk about saying he is Mul Akshar??? Go read for yourself. Acharya Ajendraprasadji Maharaj or has it and the scanned copy is with Swami Nityasvarupdasji of Sardhaar.

  • “.it is my command to all sadhus, bhramcharis and all satsangi's, that for the purpose of your kalyaan (emancipation) you must obey and follow the two Acharyas of Dharmavansh, and obey their commands by thought, action and speech. If this is compromised and who ever turns elsewhere (rejecting the Acharyas) will find that they will never find sukh (happiness) in this world or the worlds beyond and will experience immense distress.” (Desh Vibhag no Lekh).

  • Upasna cannot be of this Akshar even Gunatitanand Swami has declared: Ek Ramanujacharya ni upasna khari, bijama jeev ane bhagwan ma bhedaj nathi rakhyo. Mateh apne sarva karan ka karan ek Sahjanand Swami ne samajva ne upasna EK NIJ RAKHVI..Vaat 60 prakran 14. Shriji Maharaj has also sanctioned the Parampra of Acharyas in "place of Him". That through their refuge only one can attain Atyantik Kalyan (read satsangi Jivan and Haricharitram etc.)

  • We all know the last two as well. Parbrahm is Bhagvan Swaminarayan Himself. Sarva Avtaari Bhagvan. Also brahm if Mul Akshar Gopalanand Swami. Also a true sant never even goes against one vachan of Bhagvan. Its a shame so many so called 'santo'' are going against the vachans of Bhagvan Swaminarayan. For example the Shikshapatri like Shlok 41, 62, Satsnagi Jivan 4.46.23 etc. A true sant would never leave the ashrey of Dharmvanshi Acharyas. Like Desh Vibhagh Lekh states.

  • Vachanamrut Gadhada I-15

    Shriji Maharaj states, “A person whose heart is filled with bhakti towards God feels, ‘I want to act only according to God’s and His Sant’s commands.’ Such is the spirit within his heart. Moreover, he never – even by mistake – utters, ‘I will only be able to follow certain commands, but not others.’" You guys must read and undestand the vacharnamrut and why maharaj came to this world. what is Jiva, ishwar, maya, brahm and parbramh,every1 know 1st 3 but not last 2,

  • There is no other way after this fourth way to attain moksh. I shall live in the Acharyas forever. Who ever takes refuge unto them will definitely cross this material world. Who ever has their darshan and takes their good attributes, talks good of them, serves them with love and gets happy unto seeing them shall I will look after them forever. (DO YOU STILL DISAGREE?)

  • Shriji Maharaj has also sanctioned the Parampra of Acharyas in "place of Him". That through their refuge only one can attain Atyantik Kalyan (read satsangi Jivan and Haricharitram etc.). To never leave the Sampradai nor the refuge of either of the 2 Dharmvanshi Acharyas. Why turn a blind eye to this? Maharaj never stated ONLY the sant can give Kalyan. Show me where. He said (as described in Purshottam Prakash) he lives in the Acharyas 'Visheshe' furthermore and accepts all offerings and seva.

  • "માટે ભગવાન ના ભક્તને ભગવાનનું સ્વરૂપ અક્ષરધામ સહીત પૃથ્વી ઉપર વિરાજમાન છે એમ સમજવું, અને બીજા આગળ પણ એવી રીતે વાર્તા કરવી " ઇતિ વાચાર્નામૃત ૭૧

  • In Sampraday who is not giving respect to Acharya maharaj?Who put case againtst him?Who does drag him to court and why?Why should we do like this against him?who changed Acharya maharaj from his sit? If we know then we can realise who is not following him.

  • BAPS does respect achaya parmapara and instruct to follow all rules set by the supreme lord....

  • I was thinking the same but when I studies in details, BAPS does not believe that sadhu is bhagwan but Puj. Gunantitanadswami is the abode of Bhagwan swaminarayan.Thus BAPS shows bhakti of Jugal upaasana. Bhakt sahit bhagwan. There is only one supreme God and he is Swamminarayan bhagwan as I learnt from BAPS so please do not just judge on hearsay..

    Jay swaminarayan...

  • Think you are misinterpreting what i have said., I knwo there is one God. Only BAPS believe their sadhus to be God. Its in their publication.