So many Osha violations no harnesses, no netting protecting the workers below Couldnt make out if their were hardhats. Also they need warning signs so no one walks onto the worksite. but the big thing is you need fallarrest systems for fall risks more than six feet but Osha rarely fines on the first offence. Dont believe me look at Oshas website. I think the fines are around 7 thousand on severe clauses. Glad no one was killed.
i hope all those motherfuckers got fined out the ass or fired because its people like them who get hurt and the turn around and try to sue the construction company or live off workers comp.
@MetalRebel88 This is a fact. So much BS talked about let REAL MEN work and P**s off. REAL MEN then fall and DIE and somebody ends up paying. Its the same thinking that argues against seatbelts in cars.
This is a violation of OH&S policy. The Bobcat is not designed for lifting humans. No Fall Protection. No Hard Hats. How this can be done safely is to use a conveyor to lift the material up, or a crane. The man on top must be tied off. If there had been an accident, the homeowner and the construction company would've been charged. I deal with people like this all the time and if you think what you saw was safe, let's see you put your kid up there.
You think? "Never let them be safe"? Sure theres a thing about being too overly protective, but I'm sure if you had children you wouldn't let them play in the middle of a freeway also. Or would you?
There's difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity.
Believe it or not that bobcat is a stable platform. There is no movement, it only looks dangerous. The bucket is resting on the roof, they're watching their footing, there's scaffolding that they can grab onto, it's really not as dangerous as you'd think.
How would you accomplish this? Add another person in between? Someone who has NOTHING to grab onto?
Hello, I was refering to the guys comment about children "I'd never let them be safe". Unless of course you agree with that also. I don't see anywhere in my comment where I was refering to the conscution site in the video. I was replying solely to the remark about children.
Yes I would have to agree there is a difference. Common sense should have told you I was refering to the comment and not the video. Brute Stupidity told you I was, ha ha :)
Sorry I just have to point this out. That's the "difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity." :D
Oh I just love You Tube, you post a comment, it doesn't show so you come back later and it's still not showing hours later, so you post it again and then suddenly both comments are showing. Maybe I should just stop making and replying to them who cares what people thing, who cares what I think. Whatever, ha ha ha :D
One should never skimp on safety, injuries can be with you for the rest of your life, long after any job is over.
PMTSAFETY 2 years ago
So many Osha violations no harnesses, no netting protecting the workers below Couldnt make out if their were hardhats. Also they need warning signs so no one walks onto the worksite. but the big thing is you need fallarrest systems for fall risks more than six feet but Osha rarely fines on the first offence. Dont believe me look at Oshas website. I think the fines are around 7 thousand on severe clauses. Glad no one was killed.
hagadizle 2 years ago
i hope all those motherfuckers got fined out the ass or fired because its people like them who get hurt and the turn around and try to sue the construction company or live off workers comp.
MetalRebel88 2 years ago
@MetalRebel88 This is a fact. So much BS talked about let REAL MEN work and P**s off. REAL MEN then fall and DIE and somebody ends up paying. Its the same thinking that argues against seatbelts in cars.
rorytclancy 6 months ago
i would tend to agree with the vid
no hats no lifeline
i agree a bobcat is conceived to lift way more than a human but still
romeoneverdies 3 years ago
not very safe at all
filaguy13 3 years ago
they need National Safety Consulting
SafetyTempsLimited 3 years ago
This is a violation of OH&S policy. The Bobcat is not designed for lifting humans. No Fall Protection. No Hard Hats. How this can be done safely is to use a conveyor to lift the material up, or a crane. The man on top must be tied off. If there had been an accident, the homeowner and the construction company would've been charged. I deal with people like this all the time and if you think what you saw was safe, let's see you put your kid up there.
moobys37 3 years ago
@moobys37 you dumb fuck, you wouldn't put your KID up there, but this isn't about kids.
but a grown man is allowed to do whatever he wants.
if that means throwing bricks up to a roof, more power to him.
and throwing the bricks is much cheaper than buying a conveyor.
ZamolxisReborn 1 year ago
That's deep....you really show me your love for life. I guess that's why we're Human
cipguz 4 years ago
I see nothing wrong with that. That's the sort of thing I'd do. :)
Safety is just danger out of place.
lowededwookie 4 years ago
Just a question, do you have children?
cipguz 4 years ago
Not that I know of.
Even if I did I'd never let them be safe. Safety breeds complacency and complacency breeds death. :-)
lowededwookie 4 years ago
You think? "Never let them be safe"? Sure theres a thing about being too overly protective, but I'm sure if you had children you wouldn't let them play in the middle of a freeway also. Or would you?
mrgionni 4 years ago
There's difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity.
Believe it or not that bobcat is a stable platform. There is no movement, it only looks dangerous. The bucket is resting on the roof, they're watching their footing, there's scaffolding that they can grab onto, it's really not as dangerous as you'd think.
How would you accomplish this? Add another person in between? Someone who has NOTHING to grab onto?
lowededwookie 4 years ago
Hello, I was refering to the guys comment about children "I'd never let them be safe". Unless of course you agree with that also. I don't see anywhere in my comment where I was refering to the conscution site in the video. I was replying solely to the remark about children.
mrgionni 4 years ago
Yes I would have to agree there is a difference. Common sense should have told you I was refering to the comment and not the video. Brute Stupidity told you I was, ha ha :)
mrgionni 4 years ago
Sorry I just have to point this out. That's the "difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity." :D
mrgionni 4 years ago
Oh I just love You Tube, you post a comment, it doesn't show so you come back later and it's still not showing hours later, so you post it again and then suddenly both comments are showing. Maybe I should just stop making and replying to them who cares what people thing, who cares what I think. Whatever, ha ha ha :D
mrgionni 4 years ago
@cipguz what does this video have to do with children?
two grown men taking a calculated risk.
piss off.
ZamolxisReborn 1 year ago
wow, they need a lot of training
w w w o HispanicSafetyFair o org
ccsdemon 4 years ago