I was just run over by the current system. I got caught without a job or insurance when the illness hit. The current system has screwed me good. I need help but I'm just outside the qualifications for assistance. I now owe over 20K and have no income.
Under universal health care, the government doesn't provide health care, it only funds it. Takes the profit away from the mega insurance companies and puts the power back in the hands of you and your doctor.
Do we really need an inefficient, corrupt, multi payer system that insures profit for mega insurance companies at the expense of our quality of health care? The govt doesn't profit from UHC, you do, in the form of better health. Under HR 676, you would actually pay less.
Corruption is possible only when the governement interferes! You cannot bribe a private doctor. The system ensures profits of companies. And what is wrong about it? The system should generate loss in your opinion? Look at the healthcare system in Europe - it isn't efficient and the quality of health service is poor compared with the US. And it is much more expensive. And if one doesn't want to get insured? Volenti non fit iniuria.
Recently, the CEO of Humana accepted $180,000,000.00 (that's 180 million) in stock options in addition to his $150,000.00 annual salary. Enough to fully staff and fund 75 health clinics for a year. I'm not against a corporation making money, but not at the expense of our lives. This is health care, not the auto industry, or consumer products. Please visit WHO web site for accurate statistics.
Yes it is! Doctors, nurses are a part of the market game! They provide services. If the CEO recived such a sum of money this means he's doing his job right! And again I must stress, that public healthcare leads to higher prices for healthcare services. And also is immoral! You cannot force me to pay for my neighbour's health. If he has a problem I will probably help him - but forcing me to do so is immoral! As I said Volenti non fit iniuria.
You're forced to pay to fund highways, the post office, police, fire, war, and the list goes on. Why is health care more immoral? Saving lives of every American citizen is more immoral than sending our sons and daughters to war?
Unless you'd rather be driving around on dirt roads, your point is well taken. We can argue those points till hell freezes over. Fact is, within 2 years we will have some form of universal health care. The state of Mass just signed their version into law the other day. Calif. is on the brink, Virginia and Connecticut are right behind them and almost every other state is researching the best plan.
So I think your time will be better spent finding out which plan will be best for all of us, instead of arguing over the morality. It's my opinion that HR 676 is the most comprehensive, cost effective plan available.
I support some things, just not all. The reason I don't want the government to pay for more is because it is becoming less and less like the founding fathers planned. The federal government should never have become this big.
I don't pretend to be not at all afraid of nationalized health program; but I am more afraid of the US privatized. Pre-existing practices of insurance companies. Connect the privilege with job, lose your job, now where is your insurance? Not so many jobs to go around, it is harder for those with mild disabilities (such as Aspergers Syndrome)to compete for jobs.
My Old Friend Martin said, "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane."
I will support it when every person in the country can fork up five thousand dollars in addition to taxes annually so ten percent of the population can use ninety percent of the money
Yes - small firms should not be obliged to pay the insurece for there employees. But Medicare will force them to do so by higher taxes and prices!
You sholud read an old book - The state by F. Bastiat. If you want to get "free" healthcare and leave the taxes on the same level, there's something wrong with you!
In France they have to pay 20 per cent of their earnings for so called "free" doctors!
Simple - get the federal government out of the health care business. Federal government should protect the borders and provide a strong national defense, provide a court system, but little else. Most everything else should be handled at a state or lower level.
ur providing coverage to your workers. Some big companies do everything not to cover by hiring full time temps. That makes it more expensive for you.
Under the Social Security Credit Card the employee can afford their own health care at 1% on the dollar relieving the Employer of this over site in soveringhty rights of citizens.
There is talk about assassinating him. We cannot let the elites and the CIA do this again. JFK and Bobby was just too much. What about JFK's son? Stand up and say no more!!!
Put all the money in one pot. Put insurance companies OUT OF BUSINESS. They seek to deny benefits to those who need them in the name of their rotten profits! Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
*Darkside does not understand why businesses provide healthcare coverage in the first place, and believes it is a major cause of the rapid inflation in that sector.
I was just run over by the current system. I got caught without a job or insurance when the illness hit. The current system has screwed me good. I need help but I'm just outside the qualifications for assistance. I now owe over 20K and have no income.
helpsavemark,10001mb,com
MarkMyWay 2 years ago
Let Dennis Kucinich debate!!
This is ridiculous!
If we can have 6 republicans in their debates then we can surely have 4 democrats!!
Let Dennis Kucinich debate!
nowellian 4 years ago
The USA is the only industrialized nation that would allow 47 million citizens to go without basic health care!
Why?
Vote Dennis Kucinich for President!
H.Res 676 - Medicare for all.
nowellian 4 years ago
The government should not provide health care
AKshortBOY 4 years ago
Under universal health care, the government doesn't provide health care, it only funds it. Takes the profit away from the mega insurance companies and puts the power back in the hands of you and your doctor.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
And also to its own pocket. Do you really need a midleman to give your money to the doctor?
szlachcic87 4 years ago
Do we really need an inefficient, corrupt, multi payer system that insures profit for mega insurance companies at the expense of our quality of health care? The govt doesn't profit from UHC, you do, in the form of better health. Under HR 676, you would actually pay less.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago 2
Corruption is possible only when the governement interferes! You cannot bribe a private doctor. The system ensures profits of companies. And what is wrong about it? The system should generate loss in your opinion? Look at the healthcare system in Europe - it isn't efficient and the quality of health service is poor compared with the US. And it is much more expensive. And if one doesn't want to get insured? Volenti non fit iniuria.
szlachcic87 4 years ago
Recently, the CEO of Humana accepted $180,000,000.00 (that's 180 million) in stock options in addition to his $150,000.00 annual salary. Enough to fully staff and fund 75 health clinics for a year. I'm not against a corporation making money, but not at the expense of our lives. This is health care, not the auto industry, or consumer products. Please visit WHO web site for accurate statistics.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
Yes it is! Doctors, nurses are a part of the market game! They provide services. If the CEO recived such a sum of money this means he's doing his job right! And again I must stress, that public healthcare leads to higher prices for healthcare services. And also is immoral! You cannot force me to pay for my neighbour's health. If he has a problem I will probably help him - but forcing me to do so is immoral! As I said Volenti non fit iniuria.
szlachcic87 4 years ago
You're forced to pay to fund highways, the post office, police, fire, war, and the list goes on. Why is health care more immoral? Saving lives of every American citizen is more immoral than sending our sons and daughters to war?
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
But you are right! Paying for theese things is immoral! They are equally immoral!
Now, the state should provide only the police, courts and a army for defense. But this is another topic.
szlachcic87 4 years ago
Unless you'd rather be driving around on dirt roads, your point is well taken. We can argue those points till hell freezes over. Fact is, within 2 years we will have some form of universal health care. The state of Mass just signed their version into law the other day. Calif. is on the brink, Virginia and Connecticut are right behind them and almost every other state is researching the best plan.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
So I think your time will be better spent finding out which plan will be best for all of us, instead of arguing over the morality. It's my opinion that HR 676 is the most comprehensive, cost effective plan available.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
I support some things, just not all. The reason I don't want the government to pay for more is because it is becoming less and less like the founding fathers planned. The federal government should never have become this big.
AKshortBOY 2 years ago
I don't pretend to be not at all afraid of nationalized health program; but I am more afraid of the US privatized. Pre-existing practices of insurance companies. Connect the privilege with job, lose your job, now where is your insurance? Not so many jobs to go around, it is harder for those with mild disabilities (such as Aspergers Syndrome)to compete for jobs.
My Old Friend Martin said, "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane."
healthmusic 3 years ago
Vote Dennis Kucinich for President.
Support H. Res 676 - Medicare for all!
Small business will no longer have to provide health insurance for it' employees.
After all we are already paying for it, the money is just going to health care industry profits instead of providing health care for all.
nowellian 4 years ago
I will support it when every person in the country can fork up five thousand dollars in addition to taxes annually so ten percent of the population can use ninety percent of the money
AKshortBOY 4 years ago
Yes - small firms should not be obliged to pay the insurece for there employees. But Medicare will force them to do so by higher taxes and prices!
You sholud read an old book - The state by F. Bastiat. If you want to get "free" healthcare and leave the taxes on the same level, there's something wrong with you!
In France they have to pay 20 per cent of their earnings for so called "free" doctors!
szlachcic87 4 years ago
I couldn't agree more. I support HR 676, but it isn't looking good for Kucinich.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
Simple - get the federal government out of the health care business. Federal government should protect the borders and provide a strong national defense, provide a court system, but little else. Most everything else should be handled at a state or lower level.
PaleoBugMan 4 years ago
ur providing coverage to your workers. Some big companies do everything not to cover by hiring full time temps. That makes it more expensive for you.
whoframedrudy 4 years ago
How can you improve health care? There is no way, you all will die soon. Haha!
HappyWolfie1 4 years ago
Your employees can afford their own care.
Under the Social Security Credit Card the employee can afford their own health care at 1% on the dollar relieving the Employer of this over site in soveringhty rights of citizens.
SCOOTERBALLUSA 4 years ago
shhhhhhhhhhh my mind is a raging torrent flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives
jubbster 4 years ago
Get the government out of it.
Vote Ron Paul
There is talk about assassinating him. We cannot let the elites and the CIA do this again. JFK and Bobby was just too much. What about JFK's son? Stand up and say no more!!!
kaffholter 4 years ago
Thank God, someone gets it.
JBtheV 4 years ago
privatize the shit out of health care
snoot87 4 years ago
Pay for It with credits, from your social security savings you have for you at age 62.
The United Third Party Solution.
SCOOTERBALLUSA 4 years ago
Put all the money in one pot. Put insurance companies OUT OF BUSINESS. They seek to deny benefits to those who need them in the name of their rotten profits! Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
wilburjr 4 years ago 2
*Darkside does not understand why businesses provide healthcare coverage in the first place, and believes it is a major cause of the rapid inflation in that sector.
Darkside007 4 years ago
Small businesses are the backbone of this country. They should be given some benefits. Good luck to you.
BenHameen1 4 years ago 2