One can properly put into a Gaussian statistical data, including IQ-test scores, which find a positive correlation with school performance, education level, language learning, mathematical abilities etc.
On the BBC website, 18 of the questions are based on observational memory alone (the ability to remember what you see). The tube porion that passes for "logic", visual memory plays a key role. Altered objects, morphed faces, and colored objects play a moderate role in v. memory. Half the questions problem solving plays only a minimal role, not a function of IQ at all. Not to mention that another 5 questions are based on optical illusions, which are not even a measure of itelligence.
Also to give you an idea, chimpanzees have stronger visual memories then we do. Why make an IQ based on a rather useless mental function? (unless I wanted to remember what color shoes Donna was wearing) Perhaps it is to deflate the IQ score, no wonder the average surgeon only got a 101 on this test.
If this is anything like the BBC Test the Nation test, then this IQ test is bogus. Most IQ tests are based mostly on problem solving ability, where visual memory and vocabulary make up a small portion of the test. This IQ test visual memory/observation makes up over half the questions, or plays a significant role. So someone with good logical reasoning but poor visual memory, can get an IQ score as low as 89, but someone with good visual memory can get an overinflated IQ score.
@vanderbilt887 because intelligence is not something you can measure. You can measure speed, you can measure weight, you can measure bloodpressure but intelligence is not properly defined. Somebody with autism is often very good at mathematics but you might find he's not that intelligent in social situations. There are many scientists who think an IQ test is not really reliable. Of course it says something about your abilities and I do have an high IQ but it doesn't show everything.
1. No one researcher is claiming or has ever claimed that IQ "shows everything".
2. IQ is purported to meassure intelligence, which is properly defined as a general capability involving problem solving, reasoning, planning, memorial, abstract thinking abilities, comprehending complexity and learning from experience (Mainstream science on Intelligence, 1994).
3. This does not, therefore, include social skills, emotional "intelligence", hand-eye coordination etc. These all have
their own value, but they do not fall under what is meant by intelligence according to 2. Therefore, to blame IQ tests for not adequately testing these is misplaced, as it isn't meant to test these in the first place (and no one is claiming that they do).
4. You still haven't given any valid argument as to why intelligence can't be measured, you have just restated your claim.
Everybody lies about their IQ, I have never met anybody that has said they have had an IQ below 134. The average IQ is 100, the smartest person on youtube probably only has an IQ of 142!
These tests are so wierd, each time I take an iq tes either on the internet, or at some school. I get a almost completly diiffernt answer. Like so, 136, 145, 142, 102, 124. See?! It's between 102, and 145!
you cant say that someone is smart if someone were to be smart than that would mean they are knowledgeable in all categories of everything so you cant really test your iq.
i agree this is bullshit i have an iq of 120 and that is a university score but i now from my self am not sooooo smart, maybe i now a lof of pysic end chem.. laters
One can properly put into a Gaussian statistical data, including IQ-test scores, which find a positive correlation with school performance, education level, language learning, mathematical abilities etc.
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
slecht beeld tering
Pforpappi 2 years ago
On the BBC website, 18 of the questions are based on observational memory alone (the ability to remember what you see). The tube porion that passes for "logic", visual memory plays a key role. Altered objects, morphed faces, and colored objects play a moderate role in v. memory. Half the questions problem solving plays only a minimal role, not a function of IQ at all. Not to mention that another 5 questions are based on optical illusions, which are not even a measure of itelligence.
jtd001234 3 years ago
Also to give you an idea, chimpanzees have stronger visual memories then we do. Why make an IQ based on a rather useless mental function? (unless I wanted to remember what color shoes Donna was wearing) Perhaps it is to deflate the IQ score, no wonder the average surgeon only got a 101 on this test.
jtd001234 3 years ago
praten over hoe hoog je iq is verlaagd je iq direct toch met 20 punten
3lixus 3 years ago
If this is anything like the BBC Test the Nation test, then this IQ test is bogus. Most IQ tests are based mostly on problem solving ability, where visual memory and vocabulary make up a small portion of the test. This IQ test visual memory/observation makes up over half the questions, or plays a significant role. So someone with good logical reasoning but poor visual memory, can get an IQ score as low as 89, but someone with good visual memory can get an overinflated IQ score.
jtd001234 3 years ago
I don't really think you can test how intelligent somebody is at all
Gocavs1990 3 years ago
@Gocavs1990
Why not?
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
@vanderbilt887 because intelligence is not something you can measure. You can measure speed, you can measure weight, you can measure bloodpressure but intelligence is not properly defined. Somebody with autism is often very good at mathematics but you might find he's not that intelligent in social situations. There are many scientists who think an IQ test is not really reliable. Of course it says something about your abilities and I do have an high IQ but it doesn't show everything.
Gocavs1990 1 year ago
@Gocavs1990
1. No one researcher is claiming or has ever claimed that IQ "shows everything".
2. IQ is purported to meassure intelligence, which is properly defined as a general capability involving problem solving, reasoning, planning, memorial, abstract thinking abilities, comprehending complexity and learning from experience (Mainstream science on Intelligence, 1994).
3. This does not, therefore, include social skills, emotional "intelligence", hand-eye coordination etc. These all have
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
their own value, but they do not fall under what is meant by intelligence according to 2. Therefore, to blame IQ tests for not adequately testing these is misplaced, as it isn't meant to test these in the first place (and no one is claiming that they do).
4. You still haven't given any valid argument as to why intelligence can't be measured, you have just restated your claim.
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
Mijn IQ is 125 XD
Greetzz Melissa (JeWeetWelWie)
Melissjaahhh 3 years ago
Everybody lies about their IQ, I have never met anybody that has said they have had an IQ below 134. The average IQ is 100, the smartest person on youtube probably only has an IQ of 142!
caldo1212 4 years ago
@caldo1212
i have an IQ of 145...
11HelloHello11 1 year ago
mijn IQ is 141
xAliie 4 years ago
Geert Hoes is soooo hot !!
Esraa11 4 years ago
My IQ is very low 120
arsjaad1986 4 years ago
120 is low?
dcruze 4 years ago
Ik heb een IQ van 133
BAYDEWEE 4 years ago
These tests are so wierd, each time I take an iq tes either on the internet, or at some school. I get a almost completly diiffernt answer. Like so, 136, 145, 142, 102, 124. See?! It's between 102, and 145!
Wierd.....
MadEyze 4 years ago
you cant say that someone is smart if someone were to be smart than that would mean they are knowledgeable in all categories of everything so you cant really test your iq.
savage009 4 years ago
Marilyn vos Savant IQ= 228
Nathan Leopold IQ=210
Emanuel Sweedonburg IQ=205
Gottfried Wihlem Lebinitz IQ=205
Hugo Grotius IQ=200
Tomas Wolsey IQ=200
feraa12 4 years ago
bonnie st clair (from Holland) IQ = 52
orang-utan IQ = 75
Feratrox 4 years ago 2
lol, laatste keer dak meedeed had ik 132
papaverboy 4 years ago
Dat mensen met zo'n IQ nog steeds zo typen.
SexBirdCake 4 years ago 4
i agree this is bullshit i have an iq of 120 and that is a university score but i now from my self am not sooooo smart, maybe i now a lof of pysic end chem.. laters
muammerergisi 4 years ago
wat fuck?
kept talkingggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg only
nyrychvantel 5 years ago
believe me these tests arent right if i remember correct i had a very high IQ but believe me im dumb...
BlinkyBillthekoala 5 years ago