They say there's proof but where is it? They haven't found one fossil that is a half animal half bird or half fish half animal. They say things all evolved from protozoans yet they haven't found any transitional fossils. Yes, animals change over time but that doesn't mean they all came from the same thing. And that diagram with monkeys turning into humans is retarded. They'd find like 2 tiny skull bones and draw the entire thing off of assumption. and then they call it proof?
Good new is, is that God NEVER forces anyone to believe Him, or that he made the universe by the command of his voice. You were born free, free to deny him, free to believe anything you want, but keep in mind, if you deny Him what are you going to do the day he denies you???
@sheseekstruth777 Sure, I'm free to deny him, except that he'll send me to hell if I do, right?
Sorry, God, I would have been your most faithful follower if you had just left one single shred of evidence of your existence. I know you prefer to bless people for embracing things that they have no evidence to believe, as is written in John 20:29, but it's ridiculous that there are no legitimate accounts of you outside the bible. There is literally more evidence that Spider-Man exists. WTF God?
@Makingnewnamesisdumb it's silly because it shatters your deeply held religious belief that everything came from nothing, not because it's wrong. Micro/Macro only define more clearly the difference between shuffling of genetic information and coming up with altogether new information.
@sheseekstruth777 It's not a religion. I get the feeling you are only saying that to try to upset me.
I have a suggestion and I seriously encourage you. When the fall rolls around I hope you would consider enrolling in a few classes at local university. Take Biology, Ecology, Genetics, the works, and really get in there and learn about it and talk to the profs. I guarantee it will change your life. At very least, you could say you gave it the best chance you could and it was still wrong.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Oh enroll in a university so I can be indoctrinated into what someone else believes?? Why is it so hard for you to understand that you believe what you believe because of your faith in it? Not because it's scientific?? Were you the are billions of years ago?? Were the professors there?? You have NO idea what happened during the creation of this world!!!! Don't be so smug! The emperor has not cloths on. You've been duped into a religion and don't even know it.
@sheseekstruth777 Also, two groups of animals or plants that cannot interbreed are still obviously different species regardless of how different you might classify them to be. Keep in mind that the concept of "fly" and "dog" are human concepts that relate these things together in categories we use to define and understand them. Mammals are different from birds, but not all mammals are alike. A chimp and an orangutan are both apes, but they are very different species relatively closely related.
@RP4409 I say this not simply to criticize or engage in some childish war of ego with you but to help you open your eyes to the negative effects such divisive rhetoric has on the success of Ron Paul. Ironically, the likely the greatest advantage Ron Paul has for gaining support is that he challenges such childish egoism by virtue of being an outspoken member of the republican party who does not parrot the laughably moronic egoism propagated by the most successful media corporation: Fox News.
@RP4409 In other words by being an outspoken Ron Paul supporter while simultaneously displaying a proclivity for having your ego emotionally manipulated (and allowing it to direct you to treat others in a barbaric, childishly-simplistic, and confrontational manner) you are damaging the image and support Ron Paul would otherwise receive by associating his supporters with such ignorant intellectual and/or emotional ways of thinking.
@RP4409 "...yes....you are a liberal. Sorry but Ron Paul is the most conservative person in congress."
This simplistic ego/emotion based rationale which is the classic regurgitation of corporate media propaganda not only serves to isolate the large base of supporters of Ron Paul who fit in the 'good conscience' group but also isolates you from the more educated intellectuals who are aware of the divisive muddling methods of petty emotional division you seem to have fallen into the trap of.
I actually thought Ron Paul was an okay candidate until I discovered that he is a creationist and doesn't believe in evolution. That killed it for me.
@RP4409 That's not exactly what evolution is about. Evolution is not something I "think," it's something that actually happens in the real world. Populations change constantly in the frequency of genes. Some change faster than others and every population of living things is in as much transition from what it was descended from as it is in transition to what it is going to be.
The part where we consider electing people that actually think the earth is 6000 years old is more shocking to me.
@RP4409 It's kind of humorous that you responded to that but not to me. Is that kind of rebuttal more your speed?
Anyway, evolution really isn't concerned with the origins of anything, but it's known that different types of animals emerged in certain order. We didn't evolve from monkeys or apes any more than they evolved from us, we simply share common ancestry. For example, chimps share most of our genetics but we didn't evolve from chimps - human and chimp are both distinct modern animals.
For macroevolution to be even plausible you need lots of progressive mutations. Do you know of any??? Man people are so gullible, they will believe anything. News Flash: just because someone has letters before their name does not equate to all knowing. Think for yourself and stop trusting idiots!!!!
@sheseekstruth777 By your use of the word "macroevolution" I can tell you are a creationist.
Evolution is defined as the change in the frequency of genes within a population over time. That is all. If in 50 years there was 30% decrease in the number of blonde people that would be evolution. It doesn't matter how big and dramatic it is, it happened.
If you can see trends like that in a few decades what makes you think multitudes of bigger changes couldn't occur over many thousands of years?
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Micro evolution is the shuffling of existing genes but new information will NEVER happen!! If you choose to believe it does then that's only based on faith/religion it's not science. If you want to base your beliefs of religion and ignore science then I respect that, but call it what it is. You can't have it both ways. 1 + 1 will never be 3.
@sheseekstruth777 I just want to ask one final thing. I've never asked this before and I'd really like an answer.
I have posted some examples of evidence that evolution does really occur and there are far more examples than I could possibly be bothered to post. But lets say there is absolutely no evidence to support evolution and it's just a crackpot theory that some people wrote some stuff about but nobody can prove. How is creationism a logical alternative? You can never prove that, either.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb You are right you can't prove neither, and nor will you EVER find an example of macroevolution. NEVER!!! There are none!!!! Believing either would be an act of faith, but the laws of science fit creation. Evolution defys the laws of science. Evolution starts off with a big bang (chaos), and needs billions of years to bring order. This theory is in complete conflict with both the first and second law of Thermodynamics.
@sheseekstruth777 No, please stop. Your beliefs are not based on science because you only accept science that agrees with your beliefs. You are free to believe whatever you want, but don't act like it's an educated decision based on facts rather than a faith based thing and don't insist theology has any place in science or politics. Evolution has nothing to do with thermodynamics or big bang and your insistence that it does only shows how little effort you've put into understanding evolution.
@sheseekstruth777 This micro/macro stuff is just silly. Those prefixes only convey scale.
The only people that use the terms "microevolution" and "macroevolution" are theist creationists and there is exactly one reason. They accept that evolution is a reality but they are not willing to accept that humans weren't always humans because it conflicts with their beliefs.
@sheseekstruth777 You never answered my question, either - and it's a good question, too. If humans can use artificial selection to change dogs, for example, is such dramatic ways over relatively short periods of time, why is it illogical to think that natural selection can cause even more dramatic changes with only a matter of much longer periods of time?
@RP4409 That's not what evolution says either. Evolution has no set paths, no specific goals, it's just natural changes in trends over time. If all life died right now and everything started over we would never get any animal that currently exists. You probably could not ever breed a dog to be genetically identical to a hamster, that is true, but as far as its phenotypical traits go you could certainly get something that looks similar if you were given infinite time and resources to do so.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb There are boundaries, you can shuffle information but you can't cross over to a different species. Dogs can only mate with dogs. Just because you have lots of different dogs and over a period of time they change does not prove anything other then micro. Now if you came up with an example of a dog and a cat making a new creature then that would be a new creature, macro. It's impossible, unless it's done in a lab, ie spider goats. There were no labs a billion years ago
@sheseekstruth777 There are several groups of fish and birds in which all of the species are genetically similar enough to be sexually compatible and even produce fertile offspring, but in reality it doesn't happen much. There are also examples of two different species that actually compete with one another for mates. The concept of species is difficult to define and the names we give them are just names. A dog could become anything you want it to become if you gave it a different name.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb If you don't mind me butting in, were you there? I did not think so. Evolution is nothing more then a theory, a theory because nobody has ever been able to find scientific evidence to back it up. Until this happens then it will remain a theory!!! I personally like to stick to science and the laws of science and not fairy tails, but each to his own.
@sheseekstruth777 "Theory" means something different in science language. Theories are used to explain laws and the label says nothing about whether it is proven or not. Gravity is also a theory, for example.
And no, I was not there when humans diverged, but examples of evolution exist, even influenced by humans even in recent history. You have peppered moths, you have domestic animal breeding, you have fruit fly speciation experiments, all of which demonstrate selection causing evolution.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Peppered moths is an example of miroevolution. Now give me an example of macroevolution. A progressive mutation. You have any??????
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Look up microscopic image of a bacteria motor, then tell me everything just created it self by accident. After you do this then tell me you have logic on your side. I'll tell you your delusional. You believe what you believe because other people told you it was the truth, not because your a free thinker. A free thinker looks at the evidence and comes to conclusions by what they see. You on the other hand have obliviously come to your conclusions by what others believe
@sheseekstruth777 So I suppose you believe in the God of the bible entirely because it was your choice and not because you happened to be born in the United States where Christianity is commonplace and likely to a family that is Christian?
The fact that you cannot explain how something happened doesn't mean some higher power or magic did it. This is called an argument from ignorance. The fact that I can't tell you exactly how flagella evolved provides absolutely no evidence that God did it.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb When you have order, design, coupled with complexity you have a designer. This makes perfect sense, unless of course you've been brainwashed/indoctrinated by the lame education establishment as you have. You and I both KNOW you have NO proof that you are a cosmic accident. If you want to be stubborn and believe this nonsense go a head but you're lying to yourself.
@sheseekstruth777 Okay, but what about this - who created the creator? A supreme being that always existed even before anything existed is undoubtedly complex and your argument is that complexity requires a designer. So who designed God?
In order to believe there is a God, especially using that justification, you have to tolerate a logical fallacy that you would never tolerate in any other circumstances. You're the one being dishonest to yourself by making that exception.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Now we are getting somewhere!! God, your maker, is the alpha and omega. To try to understand, how, why, when, where is like trying to explain calculus to an ant.
"God did it" is not an answer to anything. It is a placeholder answer for things we don't know and there is no evidence that God exists. Even if you want to believe that all of the evidence for evolution and the formation of earth and the sun and whatnot are not good enough, there is at very least evidence for believing those things. "YOU WEREN'T THERE SO YOU'RE WRONG AND THERE IS A GOD" is not a logically sound argument.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb My mom is New Age and I believe it's a huge joke, so no you're wrong. If evolution was a fact it would take magic because the mathematical probability of everything just falling into place without direction ranks as imposable.
The fact that looking on the beach and seeing footprints tells you what?? Hmmmm?????
Ponder this; I good wing would become a bad wing long before it would ever become a good leg.
@RP4409 If I remember correctly, We never came from monkeys. We had a common ancestor, but, through natural selection and evolution, slowly diversified from our primate friends.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb I am a biologist and do not believe in creationism as Christians would believe. I do, However,have respect for Ron Paul because despite your differences in belief, he is a man that respects liberty and thus would not use force to advance the cause of his religion over others. In my opinion that's probably better than the other candidates whose records show they have no problem using force to advance their agendas.
@brothadave I've always said this and I think you might agree - the world would be a lot better off if biologists had some control in government office.
If you want to blindly believe that life progressively become more complex over billions of years because that is the bull shit you were feed in school, that's your right but please don't be foolish and push that fairy tail on others. If you must then lets have some intelligent facts to back it up. I'm not going to hold my breath though, because it ain't going to happen.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Wow, I sure to admire your faith!! Science is defined as observable measurable and repeatable, nobody has EVER observed Macroevolution, been able to repeat it, nor have they measured it. As a matter of fact macroevolution, to take place, would actually defy the laws of science. Do some research on entropy. Oh and also the laws of biogenics.
@sheseekstruth777 I'm not sure entropy says anything about evolution, could you explain what you mean?
Also, there is no law of "biogenics." Do you mean biogenesis? Either way, evolution says nothing about where life came from, it's only a function of how life changes over time, as I already said. Did you know it's possibly to believe in creation AND evolution?
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Micro evolution happens every day true however macro evolution does not. If ever there is new information it's ALWAYS to the determent of the species. Down syndrome is and example of this. The DNA mutates giving new information but if all babes were born with Down Syndrome we'd die off. One of the tricks used to get people to buy the lie is semantics. Be careful!!
@sheseekstruth777 Mutations happen in a number of ways for a number of reasons and, in reality, most mutations actually do nothing. Most of your DNA, in fact, does nothing. But there are plenty of examples of genetics which seem problematic but are still not necessarily undesirable at all. One is the gene that causes sickle cell anemia. You might wonder why a gene that makes our blood cells screwed up would stick around, but it turns out the same gene can provide us with immunity to malaria.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb in sickle cell anemia you have immunity to malarie but still not progressive because you die of sickle cell. This is the best example of progressive mutation evolutionist have come up with, pretty shaky if you ask me, considering that it would take billions of progressive mutations to make evolution plausible. You're willing to believe that we just magically came to being based on one poor example of a progressive mutation, and then you tell me you have no bias. Funny!
@sheseekstruth777 That's actually not how it works. If the gene is homozygous dominant you have nothing, if it is homozygous recessive you have SCA and if you are heterozygous you have resistance to malaria. The interesting thing about it is that people with heritage from africa and around the Mediterranean are the ones carry the recessive allele and those happen to have most trouble with malaria. In exchange for risk of SCA they got resistance to malaria, which was obviously valuable.
@sheseekstruth777 By the way, I think it's interesting that you try to use things that are commonly accepted by the scientific community to refute things that are also commonly accepted by the scientific community. I get the feeling that when you do research on evolution you go into it already convincing yourself that it is wrong and that you know better because the bible says something else. So you like the evidence that supports what you already believe and belittle the evidence that does not.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb The question is not if one has a bias or not, the question is whose bias is the best bias in which to be biased by. You have one and so do I, but my bias fits the laws of science and yours does not.
@sheseekstruth777 I am not biased at all. The second that someone shows me actual evidence that everything in the universe absolutely must have been designed by a supreme being I will be right there with you. There is no evidence that shows this, however, and there has been for thousands of years of people trying to come up with some. I can think of plenty of examples of religion slandering and browbeating scientists that made discoveries which went against their beliefs, though.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Yes you are biased!! Your last comment proves it. "There is no evidence that shows this" is a bias. How do you know there is no evidence?? Have you exhausted all avenues?? I just showed you how the laws of science do not fix evolution, did you research to see if I was right?? Come on here who you trying to kid??
@sheseekstruth777 I already said I've done the research. I spent most of my life in a religious institution. I spent much of that time and more studying science. I've seen both sides, heard all the arguments, thought about it all, talked with everyone about it and came to a logical and educated conclusion. If there was evidence that was at all convincing that supported the existence of a God you would think a life of going to church, studying the bible and praying would lead you to it.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb thinking about something, hearing arguments and talking to people does not always lead to truth. Science is based on truth. 1 Has integrity- is dependable, reliable and trustworthy
@sheseekstruth777 1. Evolution is upheld by scientific integrity. Over the course of many years scientists have published papers on the subject that were reviewed by other scientists across many disciplines that agreed they weren't bullshit.
2. Evolution is testable. Like I said, fruit fly speciation. 2 groups of same species isolated from one another, after many generations they are so different that individuals of these groups cannot interbreed.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Man can cause mutations with radiation. The bottom line is that with mutations the organism is weakened and will never be changed into something else. Mutant fruit fly is still a fruit fly.
@sheseekstruth777 They aren't mutants. Down Syndrome isn't a mutation. You don't understand what the word means.
A mutation is basically a mistake in DNA replication. There are lots of different ways that they happen and they CAN "add information" as you call it. Like I said, most of the time a mutation never does anything because most of your DNA does nothing and proteins are encoded in a way that even if there are some mistakes in working genes you still get functional protein anyway.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Down Syndrome is a chromosome mutation but you're right it's not an example of new information (marco) because there aren't any examples of that, unless you've been able to find any?? Waiting on you now!
I just explained that "new information" can come to be in a variety of ways. A small section of DNA can be duplicated twice during replication, for example, or deleted, or divided, etc... Much of the time it makes no difference, much of the time, it can be detrimental, but good can come of it, too, and that stuff is passed on. That's what natural selection is. Yes, some mistakes happen, the environment changes, etc.. but it's a system that works.
It's sort of like politics in a way, haha. People vote on things and come up with solutions that many of us don't like and screw stuff up, but once in a while good comes out of it and redeems the whole process.
@sheseekstruth777 Also, if you examine genetics of a large variety of living things you will find that they often share genes and remnants of genes that are no longer functional and if you compare them it ends up resembling something like a "family tree". It's possible to see the lineage. No, no person saw it occur - it would be impossible for a person who cannot expect to live much beyond 100 years to appreciate changes that require thousands to unfold. But the evidence is there if you look.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb The evidence is there if you look but keep in mind that the same evidence is there if you look that God created everything. Both are based on faith no science!
The biggest problem with evolution is that is not science
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Lets just say I admire your faith, cause your logic has so many holes in it that anyone with half a brain would be able to clearly see, when you have no scientific evidence, and the laws of science are in contrast to what you believe then it's faith based. I know it's hard to swallow, especially when you've devoted so much dedication into what you believe that you can't even support a man like Ron Paul because he believes differently on origins then you
@sheseekstruth777 I took many science courses in high school and spent years in college studying biology, not to mention I've been reading about animals and watching nature programs since I was a child. I was training to be a scientist, doing research with environmental scientists. Believe me, as someone who has studied it extensively, evolution is a real thing that actually happens and mountains of evidence support it. You either haven't looked at all or, like I said, you just plug your ears.
I'm not a christian either, but really?! That's a deal breaker for you? All the things a president is responsible for and you won't vote for someone just because he doesn't think we evolved from monkeys. How is it that important?
@Makingnewnamesisdumb If presidential elections were based off of personal life beliefs rather than what they actually do politically then we wouldn't have a president who referred to himself on live television as a Muslim then in the same conversation recanted and said he was a Christian.
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Yea well who the fuck else are you going to vote for. Don't stop supporting someone because of a small detail like that. I don't give a fuck if Ron Paul was a Satanist, as long as he preaches and abides by the Constitution and is true to his word I will support him.
@100blomfield NP. If you are interested in more consciousness/political hip hop check out artists like, of course, Immortal Technique, Mos Def (v=UzSydDflR5g), Public Enemy (v=dvOd48zlNkA), KRS One (v=RDd7UbJmdmw), Poor Righteous Teachers (v=6eiDAXpMVwE), Dead Prez (v=w0JJKHfiGis). There are even some really high quality humorous/educational raps made by you tube users like those made by Robert Foster (search "RAP NEWS 8: Osamacide").
Race wars? Really? The north won because of superior tactics and had more support because it was the right thing to do. Most people don't care, except the people who's parents are too stupid to go to school and get a BASIC education on american history, and teach their kids completely stupid things..
@RP4409 wat the hell i was looking at the gun i dont even who the hell this guy is does he suppor the legalization of pot if he does sweet but i stopped im clean
Some people have to learn for themselves. At first I thought Ron Paul was a nutjob fringe guy. Then I woke up and I know he is the man I will be voting for come 2012.
I agree with much of what you portray in your videos, However.... I very strongly disagree with how you deal with those who do not agree. When you call people names and blatantly ridicule you taint your message. If you want to educate and open peoples minds to your message such actions are counter-productive. After all arent you trying to educate those who may not agree with you.? When you call names and ridcule you shut down dialogue and operate in the same manner as those you rail against.
@yersisterlovesme Clarify. For once someone took a logical leap that I can't follow with 100% certainty that I understand exactly what they mean, so please explain who is the pencil.
Lets just hope it was an intelligent logical leap, not like most of these retarded 4409-ers.
@Tinashowa ....simply for the fact that you said that i dont have a soul. hence "if i dont have a soul then...pencils misspell words". i'm implying that you would be the pencil simply cause you dont see the truth that is right in front of you, and in true liberal fashion...its always something else to blame, never bad chioces. libertarians are the reason that you have the freedom that you do have......liberals are the reason you are losing them faster than madonna lost her viginity.
@yersisterlovesme Meh, not a liberal. I'm a person who sees that libertarians are neither idealists like liberals nor logical thinkers, thus contribute nothing other than another radical, illogical, and unethical point of view. Is the truth I'm missing that my rights are being taken away? I'd rather people didn't have any rights in the only western superpower where religion is on the rise. If people believe in god, whatever his (or their) name(s) is/are, we as a nation do not deserve our rights.
@Tinashowa ...so a love of the constitution and it's "ideals" is having an "unethical" POV??? how the hell can you say that ppl dont deserve rights? if thats how you really feel you must hang out at the airport just so somebody will touch your junk! when the SHTF happens in this country.....i can only hope for your sake that you are one of the first in the FEMA camp of death!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TAKE THE BLUE PILL AND GO BACK TO SLEEP!!!!!!!!
@yersisterlovesme YAY lets make up fucking conspiracy theories! Fema death camps...ok ok my turn: Aliens are controlling Barack Obama to make him institute health care. The constitution is no longer applicable. It was written over 200 years ago in a completely different world. You want to follow it, be my guest, go put on a powder wog and ride around in a horse-carriage while you're at it, but do not drag one of the 2 superpwers that can actually save the world down with you.
@Tinashowa ...if it is no longer applicable...then they have won and you are a SLAVE!!! i haven't made up anything ya ding-dong! do a little research for yourself...instead of playing farmville! besides while it is applicable.....feel "free" to leave!
@yersisterlovesme You seriously think a document written over 200 years ago in a world where in order to interact with another nation you had to get on a boat for a few months still applies? This discussion is over if you don't see the problem with that.
@Tinashowa ...the only problem i see here is the fact that you look at your freedom that way. the difference between us is i would rather be dead than a mindless sheep such as yourself. it has nothing to do with communication with other countries. your right this convo is over...thinking down to your level is giving me a headache.....
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
@RP4409 sorry, must have been my sis on my account. I keep telling her to stop because all she watches are stupid club penguin music videos, she says she will, and next thing i know, my reccomended for you list is full of them.i honestly hate her.Must be a good video, i'll take a look at it.
@RP4409 THANK YOU!! ron paul fucking called all the shit that obama is doing a long time ago! ron paul's a fucking genius and obama is a fucking puppet
@Leon962 I agree. I think Rob Paul would make a great president, though I am not Libertarian by any means. However, this video was a waste of time. All flash and no substance to what basically amounts to "I like Ron Paul, vote for him!" so a 2 second vid trussed up to 2:17
that video makes him look like the antichrist pretty scary yall better not start worshipin this guy. this video is about as close to idol worship as you can get yall sure this aint some kind of crazy shit your getting yourselves into when he gets elected?? hell i guess it cant get any worse hes got my vote fuck it
the guns on 0:52 suck. Except for the Ruger. I can't tell for sure but that AK looks like a POS Saiga. Whoever took that pic needs to get an AR and a 92FS or a 1911.
Ron Paul may not be perfect but he has a lot more respect for the American people and the rest of the world. He does stand for freedom and peace, give him the vioce and he will show you what the rest of the corrupt governments cover up. FORCE THE FED TO BE AUDITED AND YOU WILL SEE WHO ARE THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR TERROR WAR AND POVERTY
we need to make people aware of Ron Paul and the likes of him. Thankfully more and more people are seeing through the bullshit of western media and are gaining a better understanding about America. We don't hate you for the crimes of your government, we stand shoulder to shoulder in this game, brother and sister. Once the whole 'black president' honeymoon is over you will see Obamas true allegiance, and it isn't the American people its wall street. Keep the Internet free and the info flowing
Ich glaube das video ist nicht gerade gut gelungen aber du musst das im Zusammenhang mit dem 2. Amendmend sehen was besagt das alle das recht haben Waffen zu besitzen aus folgendem Grund
Zitat(Quote)
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. "
if the people wanted a black president with real change they would have voted for Alan Keyes. The people didnt know what they wanted, they had to be told who to want :)
@wauft Yes , Alan Keyes is a good man & has never flip flopped on issues that I know of . Heck I'll vote for Alan Keyes next time . I hate what Obama has already done & wants to do to this country.
Ron Paul is too old to be elected president as he is 74 now (2009) so by the time he could get elected he would be 76 or 77. He would be in his 80's while acting as president, be realistic, he is too old.
Hey matey, the man who hails from Devon! I am from westyorkshire (Further north from you, the ragionof England thats always grim) I share your feelings about America, we need Ron Paul to be president, we need that awsome sense of humanity to be back in Americas polotics especialy with regard to its foriegn affiars. I almost cry when I hear him speak, he sure isnt cut from the same cloth as the rest of those self serving idiots in power. God bless you and god bless Ron Paul
i agree. it says something when people around the world can honestly say they support the election of a foreign official. must mean that Ron Paul does things right. i really do wish he had won the election. us americans are going to pay for most of the crazy shit we get into. made worse by a president who cant tell the difference between need and want.
Instead of attaching Ron Paul's name to vids that don't make any sense, make some good one's that show his opposition's true colors and put their names all over it.
They say there's proof but where is it? They haven't found one fossil that is a half animal half bird or half fish half animal. They say things all evolved from protozoans yet they haven't found any transitional fossils. Yes, animals change over time but that doesn't mean they all came from the same thing. And that diagram with monkeys turning into humans is retarded. They'd find like 2 tiny skull bones and draw the entire thing off of assumption. and then they call it proof?
giftedkidrules 7 months ago
Good new is, is that God NEVER forces anyone to believe Him, or that he made the universe by the command of his voice. You were born free, free to deny him, free to believe anything you want, but keep in mind, if you deny Him what are you going to do the day he denies you???
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Sure, I'm free to deny him, except that he'll send me to hell if I do, right?
Sorry, God, I would have been your most faithful follower if you had just left one single shred of evidence of your existence. I know you prefer to bless people for embracing things that they have no evidence to believe, as is written in John 20:29, but it's ridiculous that there are no legitimate accounts of you outside the bible. There is literally more evidence that Spider-Man exists. WTF God?
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb
He's just-a makin-a you a deal that you can't refuse.
quasimod 6 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb it's silly because it shatters your deeply held religious belief that everything came from nothing, not because it's wrong. Micro/Macro only define more clearly the difference between shuffling of genetic information and coming up with altogether new information.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 It's not a religion. I get the feeling you are only saying that to try to upset me.
I have a suggestion and I seriously encourage you. When the fall rolls around I hope you would consider enrolling in a few classes at local university. Take Biology, Ecology, Genetics, the works, and really get in there and learn about it and talk to the profs. I guarantee it will change your life. At very least, you could say you gave it the best chance you could and it was still wrong.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Oh enroll in a university so I can be indoctrinated into what someone else believes?? Why is it so hard for you to understand that you believe what you believe because of your faith in it? Not because it's scientific?? Were you the are billions of years ago?? Were the professors there?? You have NO idea what happened during the creation of this world!!!! Don't be so smug! The emperor has not cloths on. You've been duped into a religion and don't even know it.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Okay, does Pluto orbit the sun?
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Also, two groups of animals or plants that cannot interbreed are still obviously different species regardless of how different you might classify them to be. Keep in mind that the concept of "fly" and "dog" are human concepts that relate these things together in categories we use to define and understand them. Mammals are different from birds, but not all mammals are alike. A chimp and an orangutan are both apes, but they are very different species relatively closely related.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@RP4409 I say this not simply to criticize or engage in some childish war of ego with you but to help you open your eyes to the negative effects such divisive rhetoric has on the success of Ron Paul. Ironically, the likely the greatest advantage Ron Paul has for gaining support is that he challenges such childish egoism by virtue of being an outspoken member of the republican party who does not parrot the laughably moronic egoism propagated by the most successful media corporation: Fox News.
KurtG85 8 months ago
@RP4409 In other words by being an outspoken Ron Paul supporter while simultaneously displaying a proclivity for having your ego emotionally manipulated (and allowing it to direct you to treat others in a barbaric, childishly-simplistic, and confrontational manner) you are damaging the image and support Ron Paul would otherwise receive by associating his supporters with such ignorant intellectual and/or emotional ways of thinking.
KurtG85 8 months ago
Comment removed
KurtG85 8 months ago
@RP4409 "...yes....you are a liberal. Sorry but Ron Paul is the most conservative person in congress."
This simplistic ego/emotion based rationale which is the classic regurgitation of corporate media propaganda not only serves to isolate the large base of supporters of Ron Paul who fit in the 'good conscience' group but also isolates you from the more educated intellectuals who are aware of the divisive muddling methods of petty emotional division you seem to have fallen into the trap of.
KurtG85 8 months ago
I actually thought Ron Paul was an okay candidate until I discovered that he is a creationist and doesn't believe in evolution. That killed it for me.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 8 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb ....so you think we evolved from monkeys?
RP4409 8 months ago
@RP4409 That's not exactly what evolution is about. Evolution is not something I "think," it's something that actually happens in the real world. Populations change constantly in the frequency of genes. Some change faster than others and every population of living things is in as much transition from what it was descended from as it is in transition to what it is going to be.
The part where we consider electing people that actually think the earth is 6000 years old is more shocking to me.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 8 months ago
@RP4409 Be careful, your proficiency at meta strategy is now being put to the test. v=zHex9GDQ2S0
KurtG85 8 months ago
@RP4409 yes.
WaldoUnited 8 months ago
@RP4409 you obviusly don't know our evolutionary tree do you?
TheAlexagius 7 months ago
@TheAlexagius ....tree huh??? LOL....no enlighten me?
Please show me the branch between monkeys and humans.
RP4409 7 months ago 3
@RP4409 It's kind of humorous that you responded to that but not to me. Is that kind of rebuttal more your speed?
Anyway, evolution really isn't concerned with the origins of anything, but it's known that different types of animals emerged in certain order. We didn't evolve from monkeys or apes any more than they evolved from us, we simply share common ancestry. For example, chimps share most of our genetics but we didn't evolve from chimps - human and chimp are both distinct modern animals.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb
For macroevolution to be even plausible you need lots of progressive mutations. Do you know of any??? Man people are so gullible, they will believe anything. News Flash: just because someone has letters before their name does not equate to all knowing. Think for yourself and stop trusting idiots!!!!
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 By your use of the word "macroevolution" I can tell you are a creationist.
Evolution is defined as the change in the frequency of genes within a population over time. That is all. If in 50 years there was 30% decrease in the number of blonde people that would be evolution. It doesn't matter how big and dramatic it is, it happened.
If you can see trends like that in a few decades what makes you think multitudes of bigger changes couldn't occur over many thousands of years?
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Micro evolution is the shuffling of existing genes but new information will NEVER happen!! If you choose to believe it does then that's only based on faith/religion it's not science. If you want to base your beliefs of religion and ignore science then I respect that, but call it what it is. You can't have it both ways. 1 + 1 will never be 3.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I just want to ask one final thing. I've never asked this before and I'd really like an answer.
I have posted some examples of evidence that evolution does really occur and there are far more examples than I could possibly be bothered to post. But lets say there is absolutely no evidence to support evolution and it's just a crackpot theory that some people wrote some stuff about but nobody can prove. How is creationism a logical alternative? You can never prove that, either.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb You are right you can't prove neither, and nor will you EVER find an example of macroevolution. NEVER!!! There are none!!!! Believing either would be an act of faith, but the laws of science fit creation. Evolution defys the laws of science. Evolution starts off with a big bang (chaos), and needs billions of years to bring order. This theory is in complete conflict with both the first and second law of Thermodynamics.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 No, please stop. Your beliefs are not based on science because you only accept science that agrees with your beliefs. You are free to believe whatever you want, but don't act like it's an educated decision based on facts rather than a faith based thing and don't insist theology has any place in science or politics. Evolution has nothing to do with thermodynamics or big bang and your insistence that it does only shows how little effort you've put into understanding evolution.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb What laws of science support maroevolution?? Please enlighten me.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 This micro/macro stuff is just silly. Those prefixes only convey scale.
The only people that use the terms "microevolution" and "macroevolution" are theist creationists and there is exactly one reason. They accept that evolution is a reality but they are not willing to accept that humans weren't always humans because it conflicts with their beliefs.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 You never answered my question, either - and it's a good question, too. If humans can use artificial selection to change dogs, for example, is such dramatic ways over relatively short periods of time, why is it illogical to think that natural selection can cause even more dramatic changes with only a matter of much longer periods of time?
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb ....Good point but you can't turn a dog in to a hamster.
RP4409 7 months ago
@RP4409 That's not what evolution says either. Evolution has no set paths, no specific goals, it's just natural changes in trends over time. If all life died right now and everything started over we would never get any animal that currently exists. You probably could not ever breed a dog to be genetically identical to a hamster, that is true, but as far as its phenotypical traits go you could certainly get something that looks similar if you were given infinite time and resources to do so.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb There are boundaries, you can shuffle information but you can't cross over to a different species. Dogs can only mate with dogs. Just because you have lots of different dogs and over a period of time they change does not prove anything other then micro. Now if you came up with an example of a dog and a cat making a new creature then that would be a new creature, macro. It's impossible, unless it's done in a lab, ie spider goats. There were no labs a billion years ago
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 There are several groups of fish and birds in which all of the species are genetically similar enough to be sexually compatible and even produce fertile offspring, but in reality it doesn't happen much. There are also examples of two different species that actually compete with one another for mates. The concept of species is difficult to define and the names we give them are just names. A dog could become anything you want it to become if you gave it a different name.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb If you don't mind me butting in, were you there? I did not think so. Evolution is nothing more then a theory, a theory because nobody has ever been able to find scientific evidence to back it up. Until this happens then it will remain a theory!!! I personally like to stick to science and the laws of science and not fairy tails, but each to his own.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 "Theory" means something different in science language. Theories are used to explain laws and the label says nothing about whether it is proven or not. Gravity is also a theory, for example.
And no, I was not there when humans diverged, but examples of evolution exist, even influenced by humans even in recent history. You have peppered moths, you have domestic animal breeding, you have fruit fly speciation experiments, all of which demonstrate selection causing evolution.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Peppered moths is an example of miroevolution. Now give me an example of macroevolution. A progressive mutation. You have any??????
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Define progressive mutation.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Look up microscopic image of a bacteria motor, then tell me everything just created it self by accident. After you do this then tell me you have logic on your side. I'll tell you your delusional. You believe what you believe because other people told you it was the truth, not because your a free thinker. A free thinker looks at the evidence and comes to conclusions by what they see. You on the other hand have obliviously come to your conclusions by what others believe
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 So I suppose you believe in the God of the bible entirely because it was your choice and not because you happened to be born in the United States where Christianity is commonplace and likely to a family that is Christian?
The fact that you cannot explain how something happened doesn't mean some higher power or magic did it. This is called an argument from ignorance. The fact that I can't tell you exactly how flagella evolved provides absolutely no evidence that God did it.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb When you have order, design, coupled with complexity you have a designer. This makes perfect sense, unless of course you've been brainwashed/indoctrinated by the lame education establishment as you have. You and I both KNOW you have NO proof that you are a cosmic accident. If you want to be stubborn and believe this nonsense go a head but you're lying to yourself.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Okay, but what about this - who created the creator? A supreme being that always existed even before anything existed is undoubtedly complex and your argument is that complexity requires a designer. So who designed God?
In order to believe there is a God, especially using that justification, you have to tolerate a logical fallacy that you would never tolerate in any other circumstances. You're the one being dishonest to yourself by making that exception.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Now we are getting somewhere!! God, your maker, is the alpha and omega. To try to understand, how, why, when, where is like trying to explain calculus to an ant.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 No, that is not what I was saying at all.
"God did it" is not an answer to anything. It is a placeholder answer for things we don't know and there is no evidence that God exists. Even if you want to believe that all of the evidence for evolution and the formation of earth and the sun and whatnot are not good enough, there is at very least evidence for believing those things. "YOU WEREN'T THERE SO YOU'RE WRONG AND THERE IS A GOD" is not a logically sound argument.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb My mom is New Age and I believe it's a huge joke, so no you're wrong. If evolution was a fact it would take magic because the mathematical probability of everything just falling into place without direction ranks as imposable.
The fact that looking on the beach and seeing footprints tells you what?? Hmmmm?????
Ponder this; I good wing would become a bad wing long before it would ever become a good leg.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@RP4409 Watch "Nibiru and the Anunnaki - Planet X Video "
MarcoxA90 7 months ago
@RP4409 If I remember correctly, We never came from monkeys. We had a common ancestor, but, through natural selection and evolution, slowly diversified from our primate friends.
mancan12 6 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb I am a biologist and do not believe in creationism as Christians would believe. I do, However,have respect for Ron Paul because despite your differences in belief, he is a man that respects liberty and thus would not use force to advance the cause of his religion over others. In my opinion that's probably better than the other candidates whose records show they have no problem using force to advance their agendas.
brothadave 7 months ago
@brothadave I've always said this and I think you might agree - the world would be a lot better off if biologists had some control in government office.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
If you want to blindly believe that life progressively become more complex over billions of years because that is the bull shit you were feed in school, that's your right but please don't be foolish and push that fairy tail on others. If you must then lets have some intelligent facts to back it up. I'm not going to hold my breath though, because it ain't going to happen.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Wow, I sure to admire your faith!! Science is defined as observable measurable and repeatable, nobody has EVER observed Macroevolution, been able to repeat it, nor have they measured it. As a matter of fact macroevolution, to take place, would actually defy the laws of science. Do some research on entropy. Oh and also the laws of biogenics.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I'm not sure entropy says anything about evolution, could you explain what you mean?
Also, there is no law of "biogenics." Do you mean biogenesis? Either way, evolution says nothing about where life came from, it's only a function of how life changes over time, as I already said. Did you know it's possibly to believe in creation AND evolution?
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Micro evolution happens every day true however macro evolution does not. If ever there is new information it's ALWAYS to the determent of the species. Down syndrome is and example of this. The DNA mutates giving new information but if all babes were born with Down Syndrome we'd die off. One of the tricks used to get people to buy the lie is semantics. Be careful!!
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Mutations happen in a number of ways for a number of reasons and, in reality, most mutations actually do nothing. Most of your DNA, in fact, does nothing. But there are plenty of examples of genetics which seem problematic but are still not necessarily undesirable at all. One is the gene that causes sickle cell anemia. You might wonder why a gene that makes our blood cells screwed up would stick around, but it turns out the same gene can provide us with immunity to malaria.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb in sickle cell anemia you have immunity to malarie but still not progressive because you die of sickle cell. This is the best example of progressive mutation evolutionist have come up with, pretty shaky if you ask me, considering that it would take billions of progressive mutations to make evolution plausible. You're willing to believe that we just magically came to being based on one poor example of a progressive mutation, and then you tell me you have no bias. Funny!
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 That's actually not how it works. If the gene is homozygous dominant you have nothing, if it is homozygous recessive you have SCA and if you are heterozygous you have resistance to malaria. The interesting thing about it is that people with heritage from africa and around the Mediterranean are the ones carry the recessive allele and those happen to have most trouble with malaria. In exchange for risk of SCA they got resistance to malaria, which was obviously valuable.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 By the way, I think it's interesting that you try to use things that are commonly accepted by the scientific community to refute things that are also commonly accepted by the scientific community. I get the feeling that when you do research on evolution you go into it already convincing yourself that it is wrong and that you know better because the bible says something else. So you like the evidence that supports what you already believe and belittle the evidence that does not.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb The question is not if one has a bias or not, the question is whose bias is the best bias in which to be biased by. You have one and so do I, but my bias fits the laws of science and yours does not.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I am not biased at all. The second that someone shows me actual evidence that everything in the universe absolutely must have been designed by a supreme being I will be right there with you. There is no evidence that shows this, however, and there has been for thousands of years of people trying to come up with some. I can think of plenty of examples of religion slandering and browbeating scientists that made discoveries which went against their beliefs, though.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Yes you are biased!! Your last comment proves it. "There is no evidence that shows this" is a bias. How do you know there is no evidence?? Have you exhausted all avenues?? I just showed you how the laws of science do not fix evolution, did you research to see if I was right?? Come on here who you trying to kid??
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I already said I've done the research. I spent most of my life in a religious institution. I spent much of that time and more studying science. I've seen both sides, heard all the arguments, thought about it all, talked with everyone about it and came to a logical and educated conclusion. If there was evidence that was at all convincing that supported the existence of a God you would think a life of going to church, studying the bible and praying would lead you to it.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb thinking about something, hearing arguments and talking to people does not always lead to truth. Science is based on truth. 1 Has integrity- is dependable, reliable and trustworthy
2 Testable - can it be measured and verified
3 Repeatable- should be able to duplicate
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 1. Evolution is upheld by scientific integrity. Over the course of many years scientists have published papers on the subject that were reviewed by other scientists across many disciplines that agreed they weren't bullshit.
2. Evolution is testable. Like I said, fruit fly speciation. 2 groups of same species isolated from one another, after many generations they are so different that individuals of these groups cannot interbreed.
3. These experiments have been repeated.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Man can cause mutations with radiation. The bottom line is that with mutations the organism is weakened and will never be changed into something else. Mutant fruit fly is still a fruit fly.
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 They aren't mutants. Down Syndrome isn't a mutation. You don't understand what the word means.
A mutation is basically a mistake in DNA replication. There are lots of different ways that they happen and they CAN "add information" as you call it. Like I said, most of the time a mutation never does anything because most of your DNA does nothing and proteins are encoded in a way that even if there are some mistakes in working genes you still get functional protein anyway.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Down Syndrome is a chromosome mutation but you're right it's not an example of new information (marco) because there aren't any examples of that, unless you've been able to find any?? Waiting on you now!
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 IT IS NOT A MUTATION.
I just explained that "new information" can come to be in a variety of ways. A small section of DNA can be duplicated twice during replication, for example, or deleted, or divided, etc... Much of the time it makes no difference, much of the time, it can be detrimental, but good can come of it, too, and that stuff is passed on. That's what natural selection is. Yes, some mistakes happen, the environment changes, etc.. but it's a system that works.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
It's sort of like politics in a way, haha. People vote on things and come up with solutions that many of us don't like and screw stuff up, but once in a while good comes out of it and redeems the whole process.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 Also, if you examine genetics of a large variety of living things you will find that they often share genes and remnants of genes that are no longer functional and if you compare them it ends up resembling something like a "family tree". It's possible to see the lineage. No, no person saw it occur - it would be impossible for a person who cannot expect to live much beyond 100 years to appreciate changes that require thousands to unfold. But the evidence is there if you look.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb The evidence is there if you look but keep in mind that the same evidence is there if you look that God created everything. Both are based on faith no science!
The biggest problem with evolution is that is not science
unknown chemicals
unknown processes
unknown life forms
unknown reproduction methods
unknown atmospheric composition
unknown oceanic soup
unknown time and place
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I don't even know what you are saying in this post.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Lets just say I admire your faith, cause your logic has so many holes in it that anyone with half a brain would be able to clearly see, when you have no scientific evidence, and the laws of science are in contrast to what you believe then it's faith based. I know it's hard to swallow, especially when you've devoted so much dedication into what you believe that you can't even support a man like Ron Paul because he believes differently on origins then you
sheseekstruth777 7 months ago
@sheseekstruth777 I took many science courses in high school and spent years in college studying biology, not to mention I've been reading about animals and watching nature programs since I was a child. I was training to be a scientist, doing research with environmental scientists. Believe me, as someone who has studied it extensively, evolution is a real thing that actually happens and mountains of evidence support it. You either haven't looked at all or, like I said, you just plug your ears.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb
I'm not a christian either, but really?! That's a deal breaker for you? All the things a president is responsible for and you won't vote for someone just because he doesn't think we evolved from monkeys. How is it that important?
chirectomy 7 months ago
@chirectomy It has nothing to do with monkeys, rest assured.
Makingnewnamesisdumb 7 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb If presidential elections were based off of personal life beliefs rather than what they actually do politically then we wouldn't have a president who referred to himself on live television as a Muslim then in the same conversation recanted and said he was a Christian.
therealjarett 6 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb Yea well who the fuck else are you going to vote for. Don't stop supporting someone because of a small detail like that. I don't give a fuck if Ron Paul was a Satanist, as long as he preaches and abides by the Constitution and is true to his word I will support him.
BlakeFalling 5 months ago
@Makingnewnamesisdumb why should that matter who u vote for? Ron Paul wont push his believes on anybody
smoky281 4 months ago
I'm so F'N sick of the politicians doing what the Zionist Lobby says and NOT what's good for America. WAKE UP AMERICA you're being OWNED!
LTL220 9 months ago
whats the name of the song
100blomfield 10 months ago
@100blomfield War Is My Destiny - Ill Bill Feat. Immortal Technique
KurtG85 8 months ago
@KurtG85 thanks sooooo mutch
100blomfield 8 months ago
@100blomfield NP. If you are interested in more consciousness/political hip hop check out artists like, of course, Immortal Technique, Mos Def (v=UzSydDflR5g), Public Enemy (v=dvOd48zlNkA), KRS One (v=RDd7UbJmdmw), Poor Righteous Teachers (v=6eiDAXpMVwE), Dead Prez (v=w0JJKHfiGis). There are even some really high quality humorous/educational raps made by you tube users like those made by Robert Foster (search "RAP NEWS 8: Osamacide").
KurtG85 7 months ago
when i 1st read the title it said: ron paul 4409 -- I'll shove this GUN down your...
the first thing i thought was pants...
guiltttttyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!
UberGamer1030 11 months ago
Someone is a GFL worshipper XD
1N5iGN1a 1 year ago
Race wars? Really? The north won because of superior tactics and had more support because it was the right thing to do. Most people don't care, except the people who's parents are too stupid to go to school and get a BASIC education on american history, and teach their kids completely stupid things..
settwi 1 year ago
wannabe
teddy12012Y 1 year ago
your vids are rubbish
IAAFOMJ 1 year ago
ephesians 4:31-32, don't be so violent
Xinthose 1 year ago
@RP4409 wat the hell i was looking at the gun i dont even who the hell this guy is does he suppor the legalization of pot if he does sweet but i stopped im clean
hunter2834 1 year ago
Some people have to learn for themselves. At first I thought Ron Paul was a nutjob fringe guy. Then I woke up and I know he is the man I will be voting for come 2012.
hex304 1 year ago
I agree with much of what you portray in your videos, However.... I very strongly disagree with how you deal with those who do not agree. When you call people names and blatantly ridicule you taint your message. If you want to educate and open peoples minds to your message such actions are counter-productive. After all arent you trying to educate those who may not agree with you.? When you call names and ridcule you shut down dialogue and operate in the same manner as those you rail against.
KendoTheGreenWiza 1 year ago
Oh libertarians...they're smart like (some) liberals, but without having a soul
Tinashowa 1 year ago
@Tinashowa ...and pencils misspell words right???
yersisterlovesme 1 year ago
@yersisterlovesme Clarify. For once someone took a logical leap that I can't follow with 100% certainty that I understand exactly what they mean, so please explain who is the pencil.
Lets just hope it was an intelligent logical leap, not like most of these retarded 4409-ers.
Tinashowa 1 year ago
@Tinashowa ....simply for the fact that you said that i dont have a soul. hence "if i dont have a soul then...pencils misspell words". i'm implying that you would be the pencil simply cause you dont see the truth that is right in front of you, and in true liberal fashion...its always something else to blame, never bad chioces. libertarians are the reason that you have the freedom that you do have......liberals are the reason you are losing them faster than madonna lost her viginity.
yersisterlovesme 1 year ago
@yersisterlovesme Meh, not a liberal. I'm a person who sees that libertarians are neither idealists like liberals nor logical thinkers, thus contribute nothing other than another radical, illogical, and unethical point of view. Is the truth I'm missing that my rights are being taken away? I'd rather people didn't have any rights in the only western superpower where religion is on the rise. If people believe in god, whatever his (or their) name(s) is/are, we as a nation do not deserve our rights.
Tinashowa 1 year ago
@Tinashowa ...so a love of the constitution and it's "ideals" is having an "unethical" POV??? how the hell can you say that ppl dont deserve rights? if thats how you really feel you must hang out at the airport just so somebody will touch your junk! when the SHTF happens in this country.....i can only hope for your sake that you are one of the first in the FEMA camp of death!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TAKE THE BLUE PILL AND GO BACK TO SLEEP!!!!!!!!
yersisterlovesme 1 year ago
@yersisterlovesme YAY lets make up fucking conspiracy theories! Fema death camps...ok ok my turn: Aliens are controlling Barack Obama to make him institute health care. The constitution is no longer applicable. It was written over 200 years ago in a completely different world. You want to follow it, be my guest, go put on a powder wog and ride around in a horse-carriage while you're at it, but do not drag one of the 2 superpwers that can actually save the world down with you.
Tinashowa 1 year ago
@Tinashowa ...if it is no longer applicable...then they have won and you are a SLAVE!!! i haven't made up anything ya ding-dong! do a little research for yourself...instead of playing farmville! besides while it is applicable.....feel "free" to leave!
yersisterlovesme 1 year ago
@yersisterlovesme You seriously think a document written over 200 years ago in a world where in order to interact with another nation you had to get on a boat for a few months still applies? This discussion is over if you don't see the problem with that.
Tinashowa 1 year ago
@Tinashowa ...the only problem i see here is the fact that you look at your freedom that way. the difference between us is i would rather be dead than a mindless sheep such as yourself. it has nothing to do with communication with other countries. your right this convo is over...thinking down to your level is giving me a headache.....
yersisterlovesme 1 year ago
@Tinashowa then it's over.
rickster348 1 year ago
watched the entire video, it sucked I don't see what the big deal about him is after all.
Leon962 1 year ago
Great Video Ron Paul is for the people !!!
bloodzirish 1 year ago
@RP4409 No hes a nut job. He will NEVER get elected. Go back to writing angry letters to the government. Your cause is lost.
tristatenews 1 year ago
@tristatenews are you getting paid to spout such ridiculous bs?
cyberpsygen7 1 year ago
@cyberpsygen7 No i am a free thinker, unlike the cult you belong to
tristatenews 1 year ago
@RP4409 Not a liberal, and not a nut job.
tristatenews 1 year ago
Ron paul- he gives out aluminum foil hats for protection.
tristatenews 1 year ago
Republican=Democrat=liar=criminal.
Doesn't matter what his/her name is.
Dr1Canuckchuck 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FOLLOW THESE STEPS 1. COVER YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR HAND 2. WHISPER A WISH INTO YOUR HAND 3. POST THIS ON TO TEN OTHER COMMENTS 4. NOW LOOK AT YOUR HAND
thelion610 1 year ago
gay
Xxsideshow22xX 1 year ago
what is 4409
rasmus0koll 1 year ago
noobig
jeffhardy6525 1 year ago
song -> ll Bill - War Is My Destiny feat. Max Cavalera
marker20075 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds.
4. press refresh twice.
3. LOOK AT YOUR HAND
bigJ199712 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds.
4. press refresh twice.
3. LOOK AT YOUR HAND
bigJ199712 1 year ago
RON PAUL 2012!!!
Zbreter 1 year ago
1:25 CHOPPER GUNNER!
mInTmW2sMoKeScReEnEd 1 year ago
everyone has there own type of trick'ery to get there point across
edgell911 1 year ago
#FAIL Just #FAIL
infokeszikle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
THIS ACTUALLY WORKS! try it
XxXFailTrainXxX 1 year ago
For all I know, Ron Paul would probably be a decent leader.
It's the people who follow him who creep me the hell out.
funnyhomeboy1 1 year ago
Whats the song?
ForlornTerrace 1 year ago
if the polls are rigged whats the point of voting for ron paul?
hubyjube420 1 year ago
bORING
TeamFortress2010 1 year ago
itsallstatistrhetoric
sisterlover1970 1 year ago
1.take a deep breath
2. think of someone u like
3. press F10 5 times
4. send this to 5 youtube videos
5. look at ur backround 1 ora fa
CullenLovesMe 1 year ago
Uhmmm hmmm...It's Acecombat OMG!xD
doligerx 1 year ago
1.take a deep breath
2. think of someone u like
3. press F10 5 times
4. send this to 5 youtube videos
5. look at ur backround
myers246 1 year ago
Immortal Technique is a beast!
aries117 1 year ago
y o u a r e S_T_U_P_I_D_
StRoNvAn 1 year ago
wasted 2:17 of my life :\
Leon962 1 year ago 2
@Leon962...you don't get it..... but you soon will :)
RP4409 1 year ago 4
@RP4409 sorry, must have been my sis on my account. I keep telling her to stop because all she watches are stupid club penguin music videos, she says she will, and next thing i know, my reccomended for you list is full of them.i honestly hate her.Must be a good video, i'll take a look at it.
Leon962 1 year ago
@RP4409 THANK YOU!! ron paul fucking called all the shit that obama is doing a long time ago! ron paul's a fucking genius and obama is a fucking puppet
airsoftpup123 1 year ago
@RP4409 I'm glad I get it. Keep on the good fight bro
jeremyelliott1 1 year ago
@Leon962 So what, like you were doing something so important you couldnt afford to waste 2 minutes..
ketchupkenny 1 year ago
@Leon962 you are a waste of life
cyberpsygen7 1 year ago
@cyberpsygen7 what did i do? the intro is too ong anyway, and i lost attention halfway through anyway. may just not be my thing.
Leon962 1 year ago
@Leon962 I agree. I think Rob Paul would make a great president, though I am not Libertarian by any means. However, this video was a waste of time. All flash and no substance to what basically amounts to "I like Ron Paul, vote for him!" so a 2 second vid trussed up to 2:17
DarkGodSusanowo 1 year ago
i wish Ron Paul had been the pres but God protected him against certain death like John F Kennedy sufferd
jmecrg 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
obama rocks
caseyjerk 1 year ago
@caseyjerk
Your right, That Wall Street Muppet does suck rocks!
cervantessssssssssss 1 year ago 4
If he rocked this country wouldnt be so fucked up now would it
kenmister123 1 year ago
i like vegan Dennis Kucinichk
doubleandre 1 year ago
that video makes him look like the antichrist pretty scary yall better not start worshipin this guy. this video is about as close to idol worship as you can get yall sure this aint some kind of crazy shit your getting yourselves into when he gets elected?? hell i guess it cant get any worse hes got my vote fuck it
MrMrbobblehead 2 years ago
lol it can always get worse...
ckhoueiri 1 year ago
its because of mainstream media our country is dieing
casagrandesk8r 2 years ago
TRY ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
russianbitch13 2 years ago
watch?v=9qixcv8PT0U
Govhater2 2 years ago
the guns on 0:52 suck. Except for the Ruger. I can't tell for sure but that AK looks like a POS Saiga. Whoever took that pic needs to get an AR and a 92FS or a 1911.
backtoiron 2 years ago
who cares there still gonna kill people
tommyfrancis94 2 years ago
obama sucks all day
MacGyver109 2 years ago 3
Ron Paul may not be perfect but he has a lot more respect for the American people and the rest of the world. He does stand for freedom and peace, give him the vioce and he will show you what the rest of the corrupt governments cover up. FORCE THE FED TO BE AUDITED AND YOU WILL SEE WHO ARE THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR TERROR WAR AND POVERTY
binkiie4dictator 2 years ago 3
we need to make people aware of Ron Paul and the likes of him. Thankfully more and more people are seeing through the bullshit of western media and are gaining a better understanding about America. We don't hate you for the crimes of your government, we stand shoulder to shoulder in this game, brother and sister. Once the whole 'black president' honeymoon is over you will see Obamas true allegiance, and it isn't the American people its wall street. Keep the Internet free and the info flowing
binkiie4dictator 2 years ago 3
Ich glaube das video ist nicht gerade gut gelungen aber du musst das im Zusammenhang mit dem 2. Amendmend sehen was besagt das alle das recht haben Waffen zu besitzen aus folgendem Grund
Zitat(Quote)
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. "
Thomas Jefferson
M187K 2 years ago
if ron paul was black,
who would of won the election?
ron paul or obama?
ron paul of course =]
DjHopies07 2 years ago 3
if the people wanted a black president with real change they would have voted for Alan Keyes. The people didnt know what they wanted, they had to be told who to want :)
wauft 2 years ago 13
@wauft Yes , Alan Keyes is a good man & has never flip flopped on issues that I know of . Heck I'll vote for Alan Keyes next time . I hate what Obama has already done & wants to do to this country.
jimdhembree 1 year ago
Ron Paul is too old to be elected president as he is 74 now (2009) so by the time he could get elected he would be 76 or 77. He would be in his 80's while acting as president, be realistic, he is too old.
Martian74 2 years ago
The part from 0:00 to 0:32.
evamess8 2 years ago
Hey, what is the music in the background called? I like the classical and beat in the beginning but not the rap and screamo.
evamess8 2 years ago
ur a fag
guitarplayer630 2 years ago
Ron Paul? Fuck Ron Paul. Elect Ron Jeremy. Now thats an America i'd pay to live in.
VoreTechz 2 years ago
Hey matey, the man who hails from Devon! I am from westyorkshire (Further north from you, the ragionof England thats always grim) I share your feelings about America, we need Ron Paul to be president, we need that awsome sense of humanity to be back in Americas polotics especialy with regard to its foriegn affiars. I almost cry when I hear him speak, he sure isnt cut from the same cloth as the rest of those self serving idiots in power. God bless you and god bless Ron Paul
binkiie4dictator 2 years ago
i agree. it says something when people around the world can honestly say they support the election of a foreign official. must mean that Ron Paul does things right. i really do wish he had won the election. us americans are going to pay for most of the crazy shit we get into. made worse by a president who cant tell the difference between need and want.
ikaneatmetal 2 years ago
Who's Satan?
nataniellek 2 years ago
we want peice
we want our coutry back
if we cant have if peacefully
we will take it back
torysix 2 years ago
Instead of attaching Ron Paul's name to vids that don't make any sense, make some good one's that show his opposition's true colors and put their names all over it.
Oraenxienael 2 years ago 2