Kent Hovind debate vs three scientist P.h.d 1-15

[SkeksisRule]

Nothing but lies. Creationists have to lie to maintain their delusion. Dishonesty is the only way they can do it.

[endthefed1776paul12]

I believe God created all. Attack me verbally or say nasty things to me, I won't to you.

[MrAlqa3da]

I can only imagine how slow science would have progressed in the hands of the religious.

[DoctorNociceptor]

@MrAlqa3da It wouldn't -- that's what the Dark Ages was!

[RestoredHumanity]

What a joy it is to watch foolish believers in the religion of evolution cringe in their seats! I hope more people share these videos and more lost souls are given the message of the truth of our creation and reason for existence! Praise Jesus Christ, the One True God! Every knee will bow and every tongue will confess He is Lord!

[2010shemaiah]

Brother Hovind was a man of God a exemple and a truther. May the Lord blessed his wife and childreen.  Gos blesse ou brother to put video of the création on you channel.

[detroitboy65]

Nothing is a problem for Creationists because they say everything has but one cause. A fairly convenient notion, no?

Ken Hovind is the world's dumbest smart man.

[SuperMalario7]

Ah the beauty of serving God, you know you're doing well when you have many adversaries! That's how you know the enemy's scared of you!

[Achaeosic]

This fool Hovind, doesn't get it. People decide their culture & morality.

Pay close attention... THERE IS NO UNIVERSAL MORALITY!

Morality is always an opinion. Spartans killed ugly babies. That was right

to them but wrong to us. Can U fight like a Spartan? So if U die in the

end no one will give a fuck about your morality anyway. It clearly failed

U & got ALL OF YOUR KIDS KILLED. Romans fucked boys, but we can't

understand their culture today but it clearly worked at the time for them.

[nagasnharpes]

We Age because of Cell error. As our cells divide error in its DNA occur, and those errors stack up creating weaker and weaker cells to the point we die of "age".

[TheIzkool]

Kent's predictions were excellent. These three evolutionists area joke. And the one on the far left is just downright weird.

[Achaeosic]

@TheIzkool

Hovind relies on U being ignorant of science to convince U that

God is real. Science runs into roadblocks but these are where

Scientific Method kicks in & finds answers rather than just

saying, "I don't understand, God must've done it."

Kent probably doesn't believe what he is saying, he lost his faith

long ago & chose a life of evil, misleading Christians & U better

believe that offering plate is circulating. I think most preachers are

just opportunistic liars like this.

[jcgadfly]

Kent got roundly throttled

[malechauvinistxy]

@90JFB why cant a human live for 900 years?..whats stopping us..especially under different enviromental or atmospheric conditions.

[90JFB]

@malechauvinistxy Why can't I live for 900 years?

[malechauvinistxy]

@90JFB probably too much toxins killing you off.

[redneckblacklabel]

@90JFB because you oxidize. the stuff we breathe actually kills us.

[90JFB]

@redneckblacklabel lol

[Russian77Nikulin]

go kent! go kent !

[unperfectxxx]

240p... so we meet again

[OptimalElement]

I'd say by far the best debate was between Hovind and a molecular geneticist form Belfast.

[red666111]

except you know, the pesky fact that we have sequenced the neanderthal genome and it is distinctly different from our own.

[transporter78213]

can someone tell me what is kent hovinds credentials to be debating anyone with a PHD. all i hear is preaching on his part. listening to him makes one ashamed to be called christian.

[TPerez1021]

@transporter78213

He has a PHD too

[transporter78213]

@TPerez1021 Mr.Perez, I took the time to find out if he does, i recommend that you do the same. what he does have does not hold water in the academic community. Sorry papa este hombre es un gran mentiroso.

[TPerez1021]

@transporter78213

He has a PHD in education. He got it from an accredited school, true... But at one point all schools were accredited.

Why would someone's main objective against him be to target his credentials anyway?

If he really isn't on their level of intellect, they should just prove him wrong.

Jaja, Me gusta la forma en que asumen que soy espanol tambien. Perez en latin es avance. Tal vez mi sn significa 'avance teórico'?

[TPerez1021]

@TPerez1021

Lol, I'm kidding with you though. My last name (obviously) is Perez. I'm Puerto Rican too. So yes, you correctly stereotyped me. :)

Perhaps that title disqualifies me from having the necessary credentials to debate on this topic

[Talonman007]

Kent Hovind is correct, and the Bible still true.

Shame on the universities.

[timdnwd]

compare loud fast talking creationists, to rational logical slow and easy listening scientists.

[MagnusCattus]

Namely, someone who is wrong.

[MagnusCattus]

Hmm dealing further with light occuring twice. If you carefully read what is written in gen. 1. you see a night and day occurring before it actualy says the first (or fourth) day ended.

[MagnusCattus]

... To allow more light in, and a hebrew word meaning light from a specific source. This means that the earth is certainly not 6 thousand years old, although carbon dating is so innacurate I do not fully believe the earth is 4.6 billion years old. And another point of interest is, the universe and the earth's creation was done before the creative 6 days. The dinasaurs, I would then say are really just a painter adjusting and changing his painting to suit his taste.

[MagnusCattus]

Kent is pretty smart but he is very wrong about the creation account, these are 6 FIGURATIVE creative days, not literal. Point and case: we are still in the 7th "day". Secondly Light is created both on the first day and on the fourth day, This is actualy referring to a process of the earth's atmosphere gradually clearing to allow sunlight first described in day one with a hebrew word meaning light of from an indirect source. On the fourth day the atmosphere cleared as much as to allow light....

[GrimmThePhantom]

@MagnusCattus, you're a good gut but you are wrong about the six days being figurative. If God created the world through evolution, that would there was natural selection before the fall of man. Which puts death before sin.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom God didnt create man through evolution, I am simly saying the stages of life represent evolution, but not in the way it is depicted by scientists. You wanna argue evolution being the origin of life well whatever, I wont ever aggree with you. But that is not what i was refering to. I am simply saying, as far as being scientific, which the bible is not a scientific book, really it isn't, biblicaly it syncs up with how evolutionists say it did.. the bible was right first.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom I mean, light is required for life, what does the bible say? life came first. scientists say the earth was covered in water for a long time to start with, the bible aggrees with that. advanced life foorms coming around after plantlife, and since animal life needs plantlife to survive, well that is scientific, and the bible was right first. Im not saying it means God used evolution, I am saying scientificaly, the bible is correct on the matters of requirements of life.

[Acrimonator]

@MagnusCattus Only by a stretch of both imagination and langage...

Plants were created before the sun... No photosynthesis... Even ligh twas created before the sun and stars... Pure non sense...

[MagnusCattus]

@Acrimonator you're an idiot, you realy are, THE ATMOSPHERE WAS CLEARING. Its not rocket science you just used a rediculous straw man arguement. You need to go rethink this, seriously. The atmosphere changed, the clouds parted, and sunlight was allowed in, not hard to grasp. The atomosphere was not clear on segement 1, then it was on segment 4, and on segment 5 platn life appeared, all the creative days I just explained it. And science agrees with me/

[Greyclouds40]

@MagnusCattus "THE ATMOSPHERE WAS CLEARING"

And, pray tell, what is your evidence for this assumption? Your own "read between the lines" interpretation of the first creation story in Genesis?

Also, please google "Riftia pachyptila" to find an ecosystem that exists apart from sunlight. The symbiotic bacteria that the "tube worms" subsist off of are not mentioned in the bible (let alone ANY bacteria!). Fancy that...

[MagnusCattus]

@Greyclouds40 Yes I know of the tubeworms, its not really the point, the majority of life depends on the sun. That is a pretty well known fact, thats why those tubeworms were so amazing. As far as the atmosphere clearing. which makes more sense. life on earth appeared in 6 literal days or over a long period of time. Judge yourself.

[Greyclouds40]

@MagnusCattus A large percentage of biomass on the Earth is heterotrophic. Sure, autotrophs require photons to fix carbon, but heterotrophs do not require the sun's light to receive reduced carbon molecules for fuel.

"which makes more sense"

Given the millions of living Eukaryotic species, the millions of bacterial and archaeal species as well as the nine+ million fossils that we have uncovered, I'd say that the long period of time is a winner. Geologists tend to agree with that statement.

[MagnusCattus]

@Acrimonator Light is needed for plant life, thats a very simple biological principal, and as far as the evolutionary theory goes, plant life was needed for animal life, not that I believe evolution is how we got here, but it syncs up with the scientific aspects. So wether yuo were just trying be an idiot deliberatly, or accidentaly, you accomplished it.

[MagnusCattus]

@Acrimonator Oh pardon me, I might have made a mistake, I meant LIGHT came first, not life. So I will apologise if I jumped the gun on you, but you must understand that I have met so many morons that just say completley idiotic statements, I assumed you were one of them, and I apologise if you were legitemate. So I apologise.

[Acrimonator]

@MagnusCattus :/

[MagnusCattus]

@Acrimonator I admit I flew off the handle, you understand now tho right?

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom Im not sure what you were trying to say, if you are in favor of evolution or thought i was. I guess I was just stating it because the 6 day thing is dogmatic and repugnant, if you are an atheist or not you should see that. I do not think carbon dating or potassium argon dating are reliable at all, but surely there must be some truth to them, so it is likely the earth is not 6k years old. And out of religious beliefs though, the bible does make the most sense.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom again, so i dont know if you aare in favor of evolution, and if you are I'm not bothering with arguing about it anymore, ive met so many idiots that cling to the dogma regardless of how many flaws are in it, I have just decided they aren't worth the time. Ignorence is bliss, I will allow them that mercy, at least they can live these 80 years blissfuly unaware of the consequences of stupidity, not that I am referring to hellfire.

[GrimmThePhantom]

@MagnusCattus You shouldn't say that! We should care about the people around us and try to help them. Example: If someone you know were to run for a federal office but thought Lincoln was Andrew Johnsons vice president you would try to help him from embarassment. It's a bad example but you get my point. I know alot of people and I don't want any of them to go to Hell because I could've helped them but I didn't. Oh, and yes, I'm for God and creation through six 24 hour days.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom well whatever, thats really stupid, its not a stretch of the imagination to think the creative days as periods of time, after all in Gen:2 it refers to the entire account as a "day". Secondly the universes's creation, and the earth's happened before and outside the 6 figurative days.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom And the thing is I have given up on them, because after exhaustive arguing they will still cling to their ideas and smoke and sputter when they try to retorte, usually commiting rediculous hurbris at the same time. Its just not worth the effort.

[GrimmThePhantom]

@MagnusCattus Then pray for them.

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom Wouldn't that be throwing pearls before swine? :P pray for them, well no amount of prayer can help someone who will resist God's spirit. I mean, in a general sense, sure prayer might, but not specificaly. Holy spirit will only operate on a person if they are willing to allow it.

[GrimmThePhantom]

@MagnusCattus I've heard of true stories where someone has prayed for them and something happened to that person that made them believe in God. No matter what, prayer helps. You should also try to bring them to church, they might then ask questions that will help them see God. :)

[MagnusCattus]

@GrimmThePhantom Thats nice, I don't believe it had anything to do with God. How would you bring someone to church on the internet pray-tell? 

[GrimmThePhantom]

@MagnusCattus Well, if they lived close by then you could but if they didn't then try to show them the error of their ways and pray for them. In my previous reply I meant people you see in front in the organic world.

[regalo1979]

@MagnusCattus No. This is a debate. He should defend his position. There are people who are listening that might be enlightened of the topic. But of course, the purpose of this is not to convert the other side, but just to defend your side. We have to be always prepared to defend our faith according to the Scriptures.

[MagnusCattus]

@regalo1979 what are you replying to, and I went on in very great detail explaining why Kent is wrong, and that the earth could very well be billions of years old. I doubt very much life has been on the planet for a million years though, the rate of reproduction would just be out of controle by now. Kent is right mostly, about the science but fairly uneducated about the scriptures, as most are.

[deejsteriser]

Kent's "predictions" are observations not predictions. He also frequently confuses Science and Religion. His belief produces no benefit to mankind other than the ability to provide *an* explanation for the world around us and to spread his belief, whereas evolutionary science has helped mankind in many ways such as finding cures for diseases and improving crop yields to reduce hunger.

[DrNorth00]

A universal flood? lol



[evoTARDSareINSANE]

evolution is indeed a RELIGION

he is correct on that assumption

[deejsteriser]

@evoTARDSareINSANE I sincerely hope you are being sarcastic.

[evoTARDSareINSANE]

@deejsteriser

Nope evoTARD

View my channel and get an education.

There is ZERO evidence of evolution and I have numerous BIOLOGISTS on my side (listed on my channel)

[deejsteriser]

@evoTARDSareINSANE I doubt I can further my education from someone who requires the use of two insults in their opening remark to make their point, but thank you for the offer. As you are offering an education, what is the extent of your education beyond High School out of interest? I have a Masters Degree from one of the top Universities in England.

[evoTARDSareINSANE]

@deejsteriser

Like it says on my channel.....

I cant reveal where I TEACH because I dont need to be discriminated against.

I have a PHD in molecular biology as do the following scientists which do NOT believe in evolution......

Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. Rick Oliver, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Ian Macreadie, Dr. Michael Behe, and Dr. David Berlinski

If you were in my class I would have the proper amount of time to convince you evolution is a disgrace to science and is a RELIGION

[MagnusCattus]

@evoTARDSareINSANE You rock man.

[deejsteriser]

@evoTARDSareINSANE I'm not surprised you refuse to reveal where you work. The job of a teacher absolutely is *not* to "convince" but to teach. You lay down the facts and let the student decide. You are abusing your position if you are using it to "convince" people in your class. Shocking.

[eoghan147]

@evoTARDSareINSANE Well if you really did have a phd you wouldnt have called evolution a religion.And jonathan wells?Hes a member of the discovery Institute.And to say anything but that the discovery Institute is a sham is incorrect.They have been knowen to trick lie bribe whatever you can think of.And funnily enough when called to court guess who didnt show up to defend their belief

[MagnusCattus]

@deejsteriser The fact you needed to state where you got your education from is so much a hack intellectual thing its not even funny, you might as well have said "i dumped thousands of dollars in the toilet because richard dawkins told me to". Well you know what, you did dump thousands of dollars down the crapper.

[deejsteriser]

@MagnusCattus Thank you for your constructive, eloquent and compelling argument. I'm not sure whether you have persuaded me about Creationism, but you have reassured me that an education is money well spent.

[MagnusCattus]

@deejsteriser good comeback, not 10,000$ worth comeback, but what can you expect from someone in your position.

[rjohson]

this first guy is not a real scientist

[metubegirl69er]

Kent Hoving is cool

[yuri1s]

Kent Hoving just killed them like then. all dogs came from a rock ha ha ha funny,,, But i do belive they came from a dog.

[Meltezz]

@perfectxmist

Don't assume...I think you can fill out the rest.

Peace.

[danieljohnmorrissey]

as soon as he said "evolution is a religion", i thought to myself, he doesnt understand evolution! a few seconds later, i was proved correct, lol! if someone says evolution is a religion, they dont understand what evolution is, just dont even bother debating with them

[Amehdion]

Its hard to believe that anyone hearing Hovind talk doesn't instantly think "this man is a snake-oil salesman." Also, his long rambling list of "predictions" are observations hes made, then worked over to fit into his theory. See, in science we let the observation lead to the conclusions, instead of the other way around. We figured out a long time ago that you don't learn anything new, if you don't question the answers you already have.

[biggamerjh1]

Hope he is enjoying prison

[pinball281]

lol maybe you should be asking yourselves why you are so angry over a man who you claim is not worth your time,LOL you believe you came from fucking soup,i think life is preety much fucked up and all you can do with that belief is do whatever the fuck you like.if you really believe you are an accident then why do you care bout people like kent who is just an evolved animal,wow he doesnet buy your theory.Let him be,unless you are threatenedd in your beliefs??

[curiouscale]

@pinball281 Ignorance in itself can indeed be a great threat when given a podium, and begs to be corrected. However, if you don't have the curiosity to learn how and why things work, and simply take that information for granted from a book that's 2,000 years old and has little or no scientific basis, then in a sense you're right: you're not worth the energy.

[pinball281]

@curiouscale dude shut the fuck up,you guys all sound the same.First i never said i beleived the bible or was a christian but what does it matter if the book is 2000 years ole or 12000 years old? If god is the creator of the universe then it would not matter one biit as they will be holding the actual book of the guy who made this place and made us.I just beleive in a creator and i sued to believe in the evolution theory aswell.Why do you asume if cereationists dont read science or evolution?

[vindelextreme]

@pinball281 "Why do you asume if cereationists dont read science or evolution?" because if u study the evidence in science, u would see that there is no evidence for any deities, and in its place there is a natural mechanism that has the ability to construct complex organs, and its natural selection.

[pinball281]

@vindelextreme so do you believe the universe created istelf? btw there are many creationists who know the evolution theory very very well.How else would they debate it? NO you see you can read and understand all the science and still not believe it,evolution is not actually fact like most think,its only micro evolution that is fact and nobody can say that was not down to a creator unless you begin to speculate.

[vindelextreme]

@pinball281 "btw there are many creationists who know the evolution theory very very well" if so u wouldn't of start of ur argument with a question on cosmology. micro evolution, is a different scale of a continuous duration. thats like evaluating lenght, and concluding that millimeter, is the maximum scale in which lenght has to conform to, and that the existence of light years is impossible just because u could not conceive of its extension.

[vindelextreme]

@pinball281 "its only micro evolution that is fact " well all genes conforms to natural selection, meaning all genes has the ability to change and self improve. for there to be a "kind" of animal, there must be a genetic variation, that is unchangable. this gene would be immune to the laws of natural selection and mutation. unfortunately there is no such gene, and if u disagree, please state why?

[GoaHead80]

@pinball281 Creationists don't know anything about evolution. If they did, they wouldn't be creationists. Macroevolution is a fact. It's microevolution over a long period of time. Why is the universe being created from nothing so hard to believe? You believe that god created the universe from nothing. The paradox you have to live with is that if something can't come from nothing, then god couldn't have created the universe from nothing: ergo god didn't create the universe.

[andrereyta]

@curiouscale Actually my friend there are scientific evidence here on earth and out in the outer space that the world was created in 6 days.. Watch the whole vid :)

[andrereyta]

Evolution is still a theory, its never a concept of us bring into existance....

[GoaHead80]

@andrereyta Evolution is not a theory. It's a fact.

[andrereyta]

@GoaHead80 Evolutionist believes that we have been living here on earth for 1 million years, well don't tell me man has been sitting here doing nothing for one million years then suddenly realize " oh why dont we make something" the oldest pyramid was dated about 2600 BC and the oldest record of mankind The Sumerian Clay tablets was dated around 3500 BC.. you should watch the whole vid its fun :)

[GoaHead80]

@andrereyta Just because people didn'd build pyramids or write on tablets, doesn't mean they didn't evolve or didn't exist. There are cave paintings that are 32.000 years old in France. Also, the andromeda galaxy is visible to the naked eye, and is 2,5 million lightyears away. How can that be, if the universe is 6000 years old?

[sk8tafrnk]

@GoaHead80 It IS a theory. A scientific law is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science. A theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (aka laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts.

Basically a law is "what" and a theory is "how." In many cases a theory is more informative than a law.

[GoaHead80]

@sk8tafrnk I meant to say it's not only a theory, it's a fact. I didn't say it was a law. And theory in the scientific sense is a bit different than philosofical theory.

[sk8tafrnk]

@GoaHead80 This I understand. I just think it's important to make that clear because from what I observe, many theists seem to confuse the the literal meaning of theory with the scientific one. Leading them to believe that a scientific theory is more of an untested hypothesis than something scientists can make predictions based off of.

[dragonfiremalus]

All of your "predictions" are actually biased observations that you then used to formulate your faith.

[AgApE010]

By the way, as anyone actually tested Hovind's "Hydro-Sorting" idea? You now, done the science? It doesn't give you layers. The bigger granules end up on the bottom and the finer granules end up on the top. Although there is a slight progression that you perceive there, it doesn't actually correspond to the layers of the strata. The strata isn't "bigger granules on the bottom, smaller granules on top." A world-wide flood could never have done it.

[lildonleeydaprodigy]

@AgApE010 yes they have

[AgApE010]

He's entertaining to listen to. But it ends there.

[wozric]

How does Kent get away with describing these things as predictions? He predicts they'll find lots of dead things in the ground??? What you mean the fossils he already knows are being found and have been for hundreds of years... Nice prediction Kent. Well done. I have a prediction for you... I predict the sun will rise this morning.

[orangemod]

"We have suffering & death because of mans disobedience of the creator" Uh, yeah, that has got to be about the silliest statement I have heard in a long time. Sure, 3 year-olds really deserve that brain cancer and a horrible death. Maybe it was the 3 year old's Dad... he got caught whacking it...so the kid must suffer. Hovind is disingenuious... he knows very well that evo. is not a belief-system... it is hard science. He says that to bring evo. down to his level as a "belief" Fake person.

[rhinnawi95]

Oh boy, Michigan folks...

[chrisinsocalif]

For you who think Kent makes sense need to take some science classes and need a reality check. His arguments is amazingly wrong in so many ways and prey on the ignorance of those who lack understanding of science and take his words as truth. Can't believe people believe in such nonsense.

[ThatValveGamer]

@chrisinsocalif For you to claim that you imply Christians don't know science. I was an evolutionist, checked up on it, and it didn't make sense. Kent is only making good points are provides sources for that. Everything he said, I have looked up, everything was correct, so therefore I choose to believe him because evolution does not make sense. PS: If you want good science you don't need to pay attention to what the scientist's religion is, just as long as he makes good proveable points.

[ewen666]

@ThatValveGamer

you checked up on it? you looked it up? and it didn't make sense? thousands of scientists spend their lives researching evolution. the fact that you call it "evolutionist" and claim it as a religion just shows how little you "looked it up"

[mystic81006]

15,889 views and no stupid evolutionests saying one thing, ha, he must be speaking the truth.

[korzon]

@mystic81006 Not till you said something,And I would like to see one thing Hovind said be debated and actualy stay on the subject and prove one thing he refuted to be wrong yet I havent seen it.However I am quite aware that science has so many theories that have been proved wrong and still they teach them in text books even when they are false so in this case Evolution is wrong and I cant keep track of how many times they have been wrong I even lost count.

[mystic81006]

@korzon The problem is most people can not see the perfection in man and woman,I can see if it was only men on the earth,BUT,AND HERE IT IS PEOPLE, ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR MAN THEN WEMON TO BE BROUGHT INTO THE WORLD JUST FOR EACH OTHER TO PROCREATE WITH EACH OTHER TO MAKE BABBIES THAT GROW IN THE WOMB THAT MAKE MORE PEOPLE.If thease men where trully smart they would see the impossibiltys in bolth men and wemon.even if it was just a woman to start with where did the sperm come from for the rest of us?

[mystic81006]

@korzon I find it funny that even alot of the seeds we have to plant our food is not even possible at all with out us, so one would have to think that with out man here or a creator our seeds would not be here. So, a smart man would know becouse we have bolth male and female reproducing babbies from just sperm, something desinged to make babbies and have been proven that it has a desine in it. If thease people studdied how babys grow in the womb and watched it they all would belive in GOD...

[LivingHopeWorshiper]

Amen, Kent!

[uvijeek]

love this. love kent

[kagato0110]

@MrBDM13 he has a $10,000 pending offer for anyone who can prove evolution is true. So far nobody has nothing, how awesome is that hahahahaha

[bizzarreangel]

God Bless Hovind!!!

[Rascal157]

Great video upload :)

I fin d it quite hilarious how children argue about facts with no citations and openly insult each other while the video disproves evolution and all the comments can only be about a DIFFERENT topic. They never answer the asked.

Hovind owns face :)

[magmango]

Great job Hovind! =D