When I was a kid, vaccinations were not as common as today and we had way fewer cases of autism. Now it is more than 1 in 110 kids are being diagnosed as autistic.
A few things to keep in mind: this guy is a politician regardless of any degrees he has, I doubt he is currently practice medicine. Secondly, his wording is misleading. There was no 'court of law' it was the vaccine injury compensation program which is made up of doctors, not attorneys. Also, this child had a 'rare pre-existing condition" which the vaccines aggravated which caused 'autistic - like' symptoms but there's nothing saying she has actual autism or ASD...
@TheRealVenna Con't: further more, this case was 3 years ago and there has yet been another study that has come out showing again there isn't a link between vaccines and autism, not to mention the 'research' of Andrew Wakefield, who appears to be the biggest medical name in this debate, was discredited as fraudulent and he was stripped of his license to practice medicine. This is one of those 'read between the lines' things that you sometimes have to do with politicians. They can be tricksy.
@BiancaDarling that's funny since the electromagnetic energy given off by cell phones isn't strong enough to break the bonds of DNA. So what evidence is there to base your claims off of?
@BiancaDarling Cell phones, wifi electrosmog, they all do cause DNA damage. So does prenatal Ultrasound cause cellular changes in the brain. So do all the neurotoxic drugs (Fentanyl, bupivacane, etc) brainwashed women use for a standard intervention laden hospital birth. But on top of all this vaccines not only contain mercury, aluminum and other poisons like Polysorbate 80 (linked to infertility in lab animals!) ALL vaccines cause mini strokes and mild, usually almost undetected braindamage
@lioralourie2 even though the electromagnetic energy given off by cell phone waves doesn't possess the required energy to create double stranded breaks in DNA? What a fail on your part. Ministrokes? What evidence to you base any of these claims on?
If vaccines cause autism it is less than 1% of kids so affected. The only way to find the truth is to look for it... in clinical studies comparing truly purified vaccine (antigen and innocuous carrier fluid) to the toxic vaccines we currently inject our kids with
Shills fight this simple solution to the devasting effects vaccines may be having on our children
The lies/deceptions shills use against the autism/vaccine theory makes me believe it all the more
Regardless of whether or not vaccines cause autism, I think our country is overvaccinated. I will not get flu, chicken pox, etc vaccines because I feel they contribute to an era of dependence on drugs, needles etc.
After enough people get vaccinated from whatever illness, it will probably mutate, leading to another vaccine. And you can see the cycle. People have gotten the flu for many years. Let them get it and build up their immune systems instead of trying to overdoctorize our society.
@bengalslash Wow wordy much? Boost your immune system then. Whatever. What I said has been said by many before. Google "build up your immune system" and you'll see plenty of links offering different kinds of advice on how they think you should do that. I don't agree with all of them, but build up your immune system is a pretty common phrase used by many sides.
@ImperfectLaura how would you build it? Would you engineer new complement? Would you recombine gene segments to produce new lymphocyte receptors? Feed your macrophages to make them bigger? Increase their ability to phagocytosize bacteria and dead cells? Facilitate the uptake of antigen by antigen presenting cells for eventual clonal selection by lymphocytes??? "common phrase used by many sides"? Please, "boost/build" you immune system is a quack phrase. How does one "boost"?
@bengalslash I've been told by people who support vaccination that vaccines boost your immune system. And obviously, I've been told something very different from the other side. I'm not sure whether your issue is with that particular word or with my point. If it's with my point as a whole, then we actually have something to talk about. If it's with my word choice, then I have nothing more to add. It's stupid to get that wordy on youtube.
@ImperfectLaura so now TOO wordy. I don't understand your notion that you shouldn't be specific when addressing a topic. What credible medical evidence makes you think immunization "leads" to dependence on drugs? DNA viruses mutates at a much lesser rate then RNA viruses because of the "spell check" type mechanism of dna polymerase. In most cases it does not matter if it mutates because those highly conserved epitopes can be taken advantage of.
@bengalslash I mean more that my opinion of vaccines is a combination of scientific personal & religious beliefs. I don't have enough characters nor do I wish to discuss something like that fully on youtube.You want to disagree with me? Fine, vaccines are a complex & personal thing.I just don't agree with you attacking 1 little phrase & discounting my whole argument.It's what I believe & I've researched it. I'm not going to waste the time & energy debating those who don't want to get my point.
@ImperfectLaura Not to be argumentative or anything but if your position on vaccines is based ANYTHING besides science, your position really can't be upheld as factual and true because religion and their various beliefs are not fact and everyone believes something different. Faith and passion don't have any place when making a scientific determination and if science has proven, over and over and over, unable to find a vax/asd link, then these beliefs that there is one are in fact not factual.
@TheRealVenna My personal belief is a combo of those 3. I've looked at it from all 3 angles & that's what I've come up with. If you come up with something else that's fine for you. And I have no connection to autism & don't really base my decision to vaccinate on the autism thing. My position is more about the quantity of things that are vaccinated for & how some of the diseases really aren't that life threatening to someone in my circumstance. I support informed consent either way you choose.
@ImperfectLaura I didn't actually "attack" you originally. I stated a fact. You may think you have a point, yet you provide no evidence from which you based that belief on.
@ImperfectLaura If your beliefs about vaccines have nothing to do with autism, you really don't have anything to add to this particular topic, since that's what this topic is about. While I see your point about some vaccines (E.g. flu and chicken pox [though people die from flu every year]) most vaccines in question are given to children to prevent life threatening diseases. And have you ever cared for a child suffering from chicken pox? That might change your mind about the vax for it.
ironic is the worst and most effective type of shill, but he is not very good at it,
He tries to appear as an objective person making "obvious" statements agaainst a vaccine autism link. but he spits out the same subjective, lying rhetorical garbage of Big Pharma and the FDA/CDC official lines
Stop Hurting Kids ironon
Go to an autistic center and donate some time helping the victims of your craft
Ironic says "Lots of Pubmed studies are flawed" Really? Give me some examples ironic
Ironic said "You can't use them to prove vaccines are unsafe but then distrust [others]..." and he also says trusting all Pubmed studies would be idiotic. Then he claims he doesn't see a problem with those 2 statements
Insidiously he says vaccines may cause autism & it's a proximate cause. Then says the chance is too slim to waste resources studying it
This is Big Pharma's position, not objective, not proved
irononheroes, more shill generalizing lies. There are many good people in medicine/scientific research/regulatory agencies. They must work, provide for their families. Speaking out comes with substantial risk of unemployment. Jon Fishbein, David Graham, Frances Kelsey, Eric Topol, Steven Nissen are 5 government employees who withstood attacks from govt/industry. Hundreds have not fared so well. Some notables; Andrew Wakefield, Arpad Pusztai, Brooksley Born, Mark Purdey - heroes defending truth
...and patented it so that only he could benefit from the profits...It's just silly to say that "he has not fared so well".
Lots of doctors go rogue, that does not make them better sources of information. Different viewpoints are critical and necessarily provocative, but to intentionally turn the public against the mainstream (with bad science) in order to line one's pockets is reprehensible. And you may think he was just filling a need, I think he created that need in order to fill it.
All students of biology and all med school students and interns need to be told that once they enter the field they will become evil! They must be taking classes on how to be callous, calculating killers. The ones specializing in pediatrics especially. I bet they just can't WAIT to stick poisons into helpless kids to give them debilitating illnesses! A life long dream! Wait, was that just a little bit smarmy? Must be spending too much time in these comment boards/echo chambers.
Now, wait just a minute, I have pediatricians and doctors in my immediate family and my younger daughter's goal is to become a pediatrician. Believe it or not, they agree with the views that vaccinations are not a "one size fits all" and there are dangers that are not addressed.
While you guys research if vaccines harm, we'll opt out of vaccines for now, is that ok with you? For now, we see em droppin like flies after vaccination.
translantic is a paid employee of a pharmaceutical company . You are absolutely right about the number of Autistic children increasing with each additional vaccine . Also thimerosal is only one of about a dozen troubling substances in vaccines like: phenols , monkey DNA , Formaldehyde , and Aluminum . All great things for your kids growing body .
Doctors are 3 times as likely to exempt their own children from vaccination in the USA !! Every time the number of vaccines given to children increases , the percentage of Autistic , ADHD , and learning disabled children increases as well . There have been multiple studies showing these links , as translantic well knows . There are at least a dozen posts where this information is sited , but he always denies them and then says they do not exist .
That statement about the doctors is false. they do.
Those disorders are worrisome, but there could also be links to fetal distress during birth, c-sections, plastics, pesticides, any number of things can "turn on " a latent gene for brain disorders.
But you don't trust Pubmed Studies....right? So are all the studies you mention above...corrupted by big Pharma? Should I even bother looking them up if they have been sponsored by a vested interest?
I trust Pubmed Studies that are done with the correct protocol, regardless of who's funding it But, then you have those who would say the same for alternative companies that manufacture enzymes that cure cancer. Double standard!
If you do I have some for you, but please tell me that all pubmed studies are truthful, please tell me that Big Pharma doesn't twist scientsits arms or bribe them to do what is wanted, please tell me that no bad science is done by any pharmaceutical company or funded by some of these companies... pleeeeese?
ironic says "any study is worth looking at if it is done scientifically..."
Of course, the truth is always refreshing. but ironic doesn't address the questions I asked him, ANY OF THEM. Shills are not interested in the truth, just stating the obvious in an attempt to look reasonable so they can ply their trade, which is lies to support big pharma
Ironic says "Do I trust them all [PubMed studies]... no, that would be idiotic"
But previously ironic said to me regarding PubMed studies "You can't use them (Pubmed studies) to prove vaccines are unsafe but then distrust the ones that don't give you the result you want"
Learn how to think and remember, Stop shilling for big pharma
Lots of PubMed studies are on the site are flawed -- that doesn't make it a less valuable source for research. You have to know how to scrutinize a study.
There are good studies and bad...I don't really see what the problem is.
Do you know how to tell if a study is valuable or if it can be disregarded?
The whole medical-pharmaceutical establishment is IMO an organised criminal enterprise set up to defraud people and to monopolise sickness care (including sickness creation, via vaccinations, under the guise of "disease prevention"). This does not mean that doctors are evil, only that they are trapped in an evil system.
The pharma-establishment is not all one big monopoly. Companies compete with one another for business, for contracts. we have a free market. They want to sell drugs; nothing too opaque about it. I wish I was a paid informant! That would entitle getting paid! I have no love for the pharma companies believe me, but sanitation and vaccination are two things the modern world has brought that have helped milions of people live where nature would have pinged off the weakest on their own.
The claim that vaccines have saved millions of lives is a myth promoted by the medical-harmaceutical establishment, irononheroes. The truth s that vaccines have never protected or saved anyone, let alone saved millions of lives. I have three photo albums of infectious diseases graphs on my 'Vaccination Information Network' on facebook which clearly show that vaccines had no influence whatsoever on the remarkable decline in the mortality from infectious diseases over the past century.
The medical-pharmaceutical industry may appear to be composed of a number of competing entities, but in reality it's all one big organised criminal enterprise. That does not mean that many if not most of the people who work in it are not dedicated and well-meaning health professionals and that some of what they do is not beneficial, but behind it all there is greed for power and money, utter ruthlessness and a population control and reduction agenda they are not aware of.
well, if there is a population control agenda they are doing a piss-poor job. Surely it can't be too difficult to kill off a couple of billion people and make it look like an epidemic? Why are we still so overpopulated? Or is the plan so insidious it will take a hundred more years, since vaccines have been with us the same amount of time...?
So far the genocidal agenda has been implemented according to the principle of "boiling the frog slowly," except for tainted vaccines given to Africans, causing devastation via AIDS; experimental hep B vaccine given to US gays which also caused them to died from AIDS, and experimental vaccines given to US soldiers which have killed thousands (due to vaccine-induced Gulf War Syndrome).
The so-called swine flu and the vaccination campaign is being staged to create a killer flu pandemc similar to the one in 1918, which was also vaccine-induced.
Gulf War Illness (no longer a syndrome-and NOT deadly) was systematically assessed by doctors both within and outside of the military. Pesticide exposure or toxic coatings on their uniforms are possible, but nothing is certain, though the anthrax vaccines have been ruled out. I have a good source on this, you cannot use GWI -- and I can put you in touch with the source. Plus, the US gov't offers full compensation for sufferers. Again, a lame way to kill people--with headaches and rashes.
Gulf War Syndrome is called a syndrome because there was supposedly no clearly recognisable cause. Syndrome or Illness - the fact is that thousands of veterans wave died from it. many are sick and dying. The veterans were told it was all in their head and given psychiatric drugs, while life-saving medical treatment was being withheld from them. The soldiers had been given experimental vaccines which sickened and killed them, among them soliders who were never deployed overseas.
Google 'Scott Siefken.' Scott suffered a severe skin problem as a result of vaccination. 90% of his skin was eventually surgically removed. He died a short time later. You can find a photo of Scott on Google Images.
I know that GWI has harmed lots of people, no one disputes that, least of all the government which offers compensation and recognition. But I wonder why, out of all the things that it could be, do you focus on the vaccines? If the military experimented on the troops secretly, they could have put microorganisms in their water. Or exposed them to undetectable amounts of gases or pathogens in the air. If anything they would test bio-weapons that Iraq had, which were not vaccines.
No, the swine flu vaccine, which is in fact a bioweapon, is designed to take care of things. I have just spoken to a Thai man this afternoon who was given a swine flu shot as part of a vaccine trial in September and who now has no strength in the right side of his body and can hardly walk.
That is true, any vaccine has possible side effects that include all kinds of nasty reactions and even death. They do not deny or try to hide that fact.
So...since the H1N1 shot is in fact a bioweapon can we expect then, that in a few months everyone who took the vaccine will start experiencing the effects of the Thai gentleman you spoke of?
And yes, according to US neurosurgeon and health educator Dr Russell Blaylock MD (and others), people who take the swine flu shot can look forward to severe illness and a premature death. The casualties will be blamed on the swine flu (a mutated strain), which will cause many more people to get vaccinated, and in turn to get ill and die. This is in fact how the "Spanish flu" in 1918 came about.
Okay, okay, I know that is your point (that the intent of vaccines it to harm) , but I'm trying to get at WHY you have decided that is so. Yes, there have been unfortunate adverse events, but so far, with H1N1, not that many. It has been heralded as a very successful and safe campaign. So are you saying that the effects will simply be delayed so that it will not be easy to trace?
"So are you saying that the effects will simply be delayed so that it will not be easy to trace?"
Take Gulf War Illness. Whether it was vaccine-induced (as I believe it mainly was) is beside the point here. Thousands have died, and many more have become ill, yet there has been a virtual media black-out about it and many were denied medical treatment. It will no doubt be the same with swine flu vaccine injuries.
The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic was also vaccine-related, but 90 years later this is still not acknowledged by the establlshment responsible. for obvious reasons, just as it falsely maintains that vaccines have saved miliions of lives.
Acknowledged by the establishment? You don't see astronomers debating with or even acknowledging the Flat Earth Society, not because there is a cover up but because it would waste everyone's time.
Your whole point is that vaccines are the cause of harm and that pandemics and all kinds of other illness were created by vaccines. You must see that this is a crazy assertion given the evidence.
Show me where I denied that vaccines could cause autism. Show me where I defend "Big Pharma".
At the very least, there are government restrictions on any medication that makes any sort of claim, and there are standards of testing and trials required to show safety. And we hear about deaths from drugs like Oxycontin, fen-phen, etc.
The fact that there are correlations with vaccines and autism does not prove causality. Vaccines could very well cause autism. But where is the proof???
Science ISN'T taking into account WHY illness results WHEN it does. Federal government doesn't want to be responsible for HARMING people when they have, because it will break the bank. Where's your brain? Thank God there are researchers and doctors stepping forward to admit the truth about vaccines harming children and taking steps to protect the public's health.
I was disabled 10 years ago by a tetaus shot and I can't walk anymore. What do you know about this subject?
This doctor exposes the truth of the systme's intentions when he refers to children as "possessions" and "commodities" at 2:07. How may vaccinations can wel $ELL? Never mind how many may be screwed up along the way. What a phony piece of crap!
wow.... my comments are so buried...Toxicology of thiomersal:
Clarkson TW (2002). "The three modern faces of mercury". Environ Health Perspect 110 (S1): 1123. PMID 11834460Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006). "The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds". Crit Rev Toxicol 36 (8): 60962. doi:10.1080/10408440600845619. PMID 16973445
Pichichero ME, . (2008). "Mercury levels in newborns and infants after receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccines".Pediatrics 121(2):e20814
This doctor also asks: "Why do most children have absolutely no problem with vaccines?" There is a whopping le right there, for a start. In fact EVERY CHILD IS A VACCINE-INJURED CHILD, regardless of whether the damage is visible or not. Vaccines are devastating for children's develping brains and immune systems. Few children escape relatively unscathed.
"Give proof that vaccines do more damage, than say.pertussis, tetanus, diphteria, .... put together."
No reliable statistics are available because there is no mandatory reporting of vaccine reactions or deaths anywhere in the world, nor are there any studies comparing the health of vaccinated with that of unvaccinated children. I wonder why. Would it by ay chance be that the truth of how devastating vaccines are must not be known!
vax -- you blocked me from your videos, are you afraid of me?
"reliable statistics"? but if you pick graphs from the places where you accuse of not being reliable...
and there is studies that compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated people: hospital records. or you so ignorant and crazy to forget to read the data from this sources.
Sorry, I didn't know that Englsih wasn't your first language. Does that mean though that people form Portugal are as brain-washed about vaccination as people from anywhere else in the world?
VAERS is the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System which serves to record adverse events following vaccination on a voluntary basis. Because few doctors bother to report adverse vaccine deaths and injuries, it is generally estimated that only 1 - 10 % of actual reactions are reported/recorded.
The (rather troubling) VAERS figures therefore have to be multiplied by a factor of 90 - 99 to get an approximately true figure of actually occurring deaths and reactions.
Also, the adverse events recorded are mostly the serious reactions. Then there are the hundreds of thousands of children who suffer minimal post-vaccinal encephalopathies (minor, in many cases almost imperceptible) brain damage following vaccination. This may then translate into developmental problems including speech and learning disorders and all the rest of it, yet a connection to vaccination may never even be considered. The same is true for childhood cancers and leukemias.
Do you also take into effect the adverse reactions reported that are not serious, but made by people claiming the reaction to be serious? You know, of course, that if I call in to report to VAERS that my skin fell off and I grew a second head they have to take my report seriously and record all the details?
I think your assumption that the number needs to be multiplied by a factor of 90-99 is, not a figure based in reality, not sure how you came to that multiplier.
From the FDA webpage 'Vaccines, Blood and Biologics':
The incidence rate (how often events occur) cannot be calculated from VAERS data, because not all events are reported and the exact number of administered doses cannot be known.
VAERS data are from a passive surveillance system and represent unverified reports of adverse events temporally associated with one or more vaccines. Such data are subject to limitations of under-reporting, simultaneous administration of multiple vaccine antigens, reporting bias, and lack of incidence rates in unvaccinated comparison groups.
Why is such a shoddy system not replaced with a scientific one? The reason is self-explanatory.
Did you hear this? This doctor said that "Our children are our most precious commodity.." A commodity? Vaccines are indeed the goose that lays the golden eggs for the medical-pharmaceutical industry - from the sale of vaccines, and from the treatment of the the wide-spread harm vaccines cause! Precious - commodity? Right! Like girl's and young women's "pelvic goldmines" currently exploited by means of Merck's magic crap Gardasil vaccine.
"you keep forgetting that pharma corp loses money with the vaccines"
Yes, sure. The course of 3 shots of Merck's crap experimental Gardasil vaccine alone costs several hundred dollars. It costs tax-payers thousands of dollars to have a child fully vaccinated.
something was lost in my argument while i was translating my thoughts to english, sorry, i'll say it again: if people do not get vaccinated. it costs more to the tax payers to support for hospital care and antibiotics for diseases that could have been prevented
Governments and the medicalpharmaceutical establishment are in this criminal eneterprise together. The interviewer was excellent, The doctor's preformance was quite revealing, especially referring to our young as a precious rescource, considering that he and his colleagues routinely maim and kill babies and children by injecting them with highly toxic vaccines.
One of the mistakes often made is that the Autism spectrum is a result of the same causal factors for all individuals. That is highly unlikely.
My family is prone to non-regressive autism and therefore I believe the cause in that case to be genetic or at least mostly genetic. However, I have spoken to intelligent parents who claim that their child regressed after the MMR. IMO it's patronising to dismiss their observations as coincidently noticing the symptoms for the first time.
Most children who get vaccines are NOT "pefectly fine". Every vaccinated child is a vaccine-injured child, even if it isn't obvious. Vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise. Vaccines DO NOT prevent diseases. They can't admit a connection, for the reasons stated on this video. The claims for compensation would be enormous.
Watch the youtube video "CDC Chief Admits that Vaccines Trigger Autism". When watching this video, it becomes rather obvious that this whole vaccine business is an organised criminal enterprise.
MY GRANDSON was VACCINATED WITH MMR AND FLU shots AT ONCE, HE IS IN THE HOSPITAL WITH A HORRID SKIN RASH COVERED FROM HEAD TO TOE. HE IS TESTED POSITIVE FOR MEASELS, MONO, EPSTEIN BARR, AND ONE OTHER I CAN'T REMEMBER. IT IS HORRID! I HAVE PHOTOS I will post on YOUTUBE SOON. HE IS 1 YEAR OLD AND IN QUARENTINED. IT MAKES ME SICK TO MY STOMACH I hope he has a chance!!! Dr's are stumped. dahhh
my son has changed after vaccination..he was a perfect little baby before his enjection,he was eye contacting,after his enjection he has changed,every time I mention this to his doctor,they are telling me '' NO there is no evidence injection can cause it'' :((( I can't make my voice heard :((
I am so sorry to hear about your son. But there are many things that could happen to make him change. People don't make note of every situational event when children have a developmental shift, but it seems to correlate to vaccines because of confirmation bias. It is important to look for other things that could have happened and not be so committed to the vaccine theory for the sake of being thorough, Consider what else may be at play, and be open. That is the best way to advocate for him.
If someone lies in the middle of the road with internal injuries and broken bones, these could have been caused by any of a number of factors, including being struck with satellite debris. The most likely cause is however still vehicle impact.
It's strange that when babies or children are injected with toxic vaccines, any problem that occurs couldn't possibly have been caused by the vaccine, as vaccines are said to be safe. Talk about idiocy!
Yes, you are right. When it happens around the time a vaccine happens, it's easy to tie the two together. But what about all the kids who develop problems 6 months after? Or from birth? Or a year later...or in kids not vaccinated? I suppose you will make any occurence fit your theory. I could do the same thing. ..Electro-magnetic fields--have you noticed how autism has increased with the number of electronic devices people bring into their homes?? Or preservatives in foods? or GM foods
You are quite right, irononheroes. The illnesses and disorders in children (and adults are caused by any of a number of factors, including those you mentioned, or any combination of them.
However, vaccination is clearly as a major source of disturbance, as the poisoning of the organism with the neurotoxic and allergenic biological and chemical agents represents a major assault on the immature and developing immune and nervous systems.
The absence of short- and long-term studies comparing the health of vaccinated with those of unvaccinated children is a clear indication of the criminal nature of vaccination as an ideology and that - far from it being a method of disease prevention - it is in fact an organised criminal enterprise disguised as health protection.
Kids with the most vaccines live in the west. Kids with the fewest vaccines live in developing countries. Where will you find cholera, malaria, rubella, polio, pertussis, diptheria etc etc in the highest numbers? Which children (or teens, or adults) will have the best health if given physical examinations determining overall health? Do you want me to put you in touch with an African-based epidemiologist --do you know what he would say? What do you consider "health"-what are your criteria?
Kids are sicker in developing countries because of malnutrition, unclean drinking water and vaccines. They are healthier in developed nations because of better living conditions. Google 'Dr A Kalokerinos inteview.'
Did he call our children a "commodity"? WHAT KIND OF FUCKED UP PEOPLE WORK IN GOVERNMENT! Vaccinate their ass, if they get autism then it's for the public good!!!
Yes he did. Obviously because this commodity is there to satisfy his sadistic tendencies by sticking needles into them, while at the same time reaping financial rewards. It's a paradise for psychopaths like him.
"oncologists heal more cancers using medical knowledge"
I reckon that their treatments kill the patients quicker than the cancer does. I guess they consider it a cure of sorts: "the patient doesn't suffer from cancer any more...only, he's unfortunately dead!" Hmmm...
w8 vax you assuming again.... tell the source saying that oncologists kill the patients more quickly than the cancer itself. don't link bogus websites, but papers please.
and could you please ublock me from your videos, or you just afraid of my arguments?
"tell the source saying that oncologists kill the patients more quickly than the cancer itself"
Yes, me. Also others, like Edward G Griffin in his book and video "World without Cancer", or Moss in his book about the corrupt Cancer Industry. As the saying goes, there are more people making a living from cancer than die from it", and "there is a lot more money to be made from looking for a cancer cure than there is from finding a cancer cure."
nice, more conspiracy talk and no actual research to prove your point....
again:; check hospital records and see for yourself for the truth. try not to use people like Edward G Griff to prove your claims. a film producer is hardly a source of credibility to prove anyones point.
I hasve met Edward. He's a fine man who has done outstanding research on a number of issues - unlike the usefukl idiots and willing fools who work for vaccination mafia or in the cancer industry.
w8....you actually claiming that griffin has made research? LOL, please explain here where he has gone for "research"...you'll be surprised how much bias he is sitting on and how much money he is making for himself for fooling people like you.... and you call "mafia" the pharma corp....
and before you start talking griffin nonsense: "A 2006 Cochrane review of the evidence concluded "The claim that Laetrile has beneficial effects for cancer patients is not supported by data from controlled clinical trials." "laetrile was tested on 14 tumor systems, and a Sloan-Kettering press release concluded that "laetrile showed no beneficial effects"."
"a Sloan-Kettering press release concluded that "laetrile showed no beneficial effects"."
SK would say that , wouldn't they. They are the people who make lots of money from poisoning people with toxic drugs under the guise of "cancer therapy".
I find the history of the cancer industry far more interesting than the laetrile issue, as it goes back to IG Farben under Nazi Germany.
and here we go again.... david icke like conspiracy..... and no regard to the fact that selling medication is like selling any other product.... everyone wants to make a profict out of it.
"Do vaccines cause autism" - the answer is NO VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM THEY CAUSE VACCINE DAMAGE THAT MIRRORS SOME OF THE SYMPTOMS OF AUTISM - BY OPENING UP THE DIAGNOSIS CRITERA ON AUTISM THE VAXERS TRIED TO HIDE WHAT THEY WERE DOING. AUTISM IS GENETIC AND ITS THE NEXT STEP IN HUMAN EVOLUTION - WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE LAUNCHING A HATE CAMPAIGN AGAINST AUTISTICS MAKING IT LOOK AS IF ITS MUTATED BAD GENETICS A DISEASE!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The government said that vaccines are good. Nothing more needs to be said. The government would not lie tous. The government is here to help us. If it weren't for the government we would all die of starvation or diseases or murderers. People need to stop questioning the good and holy government. Do what you are told. They know better than all of us.
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
"It's the flouride in the water, not the mercury!"
It's both - and also the aluminum in vaccines, as well as vaccines that don't have mercury in them. Watch the youtube video 'Creating a nation of zombies.'
I'm sorry, but not surprised, to hear it. In According to a letter by Dr B Classen published in the New Zealand Medical Journal, there was a 60% increase in insulin-dependent diabetes in children following the first hep B vaccination campaign, some years ago. Dr Classen expected a similar ncrease to follow hib vaccination campaign which was being announced at the time.
You said I was lying when I said that Dr Classen had a letter published in the NZMJ in which he said that the hep B vaccine had caused a 60 % increase in juvenile diabetes. I have shown you that my claim was correct, and you don't like it, so you go off into a number of unrelated arguments. I recokon you are a troll paid by the vax mafia to discredit anti--vaxers and their arguments.
1) vax, you've blocked me from your videos, that shows how afraid you are from my arguments.
2) i read the letter and some of the work of dr. classen, most has a very bad critic, mainly he does not do double-blind research.
3) i told you are lying because the relation to hep B and diabetes as nothing to do with the vaccine. and you can check literature, apart from the well reffuted dr classen.
No he isn't; he's in may ways as brain-washed as the rest. But that was not what the argument was about. You (wrongly) disputed that a letter of his was published in the NZMJ in which he said that there had been a 60% increase in juvenile diabetes in children who had got the hep B shot,.
and i told you, after review and research, dr classen was not proven right. there is not an increase of diabetes because of vaccination, no link whatsoever of long term effects because of vaccination.
When I was a kid, vaccinations were not as common as today and we had way fewer cases of autism. Now it is more than 1 in 110 kids are being diagnosed as autistic.
Challagar 8 months ago
A few things to keep in mind: this guy is a politician regardless of any degrees he has, I doubt he is currently practice medicine. Secondly, his wording is misleading. There was no 'court of law' it was the vaccine injury compensation program which is made up of doctors, not attorneys. Also, this child had a 'rare pre-existing condition" which the vaccines aggravated which caused 'autistic - like' symptoms but there's nothing saying she has actual autism or ASD...
TheRealVenna 8 months ago
@TheRealVenna Con't: further more, this case was 3 years ago and there has yet been another study that has come out showing again there isn't a link between vaccines and autism, not to mention the 'research' of Andrew Wakefield, who appears to be the biggest medical name in this debate, was discredited as fraudulent and he was stripped of his license to practice medicine. This is one of those 'read between the lines' things that you sometimes have to do with politicians. They can be tricksy.
TheRealVenna 8 months ago
@BiancaDarling that's funny since the electromagnetic energy given off by cell phones isn't strong enough to break the bonds of DNA. So what evidence is there to base your claims off of?
bengalslash 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For an interesting article Google: 'Guatemalans to sue US government for secretly infecting them with syphilis.'
promiseIsaih60 10 months ago
See: Andrew Wakefield's scientific fraud was worse than previously thought. Respectful Insolence is a top medical blogger.
murmur5555 1 year ago
Who knows, there may be a link. It runs in my family so, in our case, we're born on the spectrum.
santurchena 1 year ago
@BiancaDarling Cell phones, wifi electrosmog, they all do cause DNA damage. So does prenatal Ultrasound cause cellular changes in the brain. So do all the neurotoxic drugs (Fentanyl, bupivacane, etc) brainwashed women use for a standard intervention laden hospital birth. But on top of all this vaccines not only contain mercury, aluminum and other poisons like Polysorbate 80 (linked to infertility in lab animals!) ALL vaccines cause mini strokes and mild, usually almost undetected braindamage
lioralourie2 1 year ago
@lioralourie2 even though the electromagnetic energy given off by cell phone waves doesn't possess the required energy to create double stranded breaks in DNA? What a fail on your part. Ministrokes? What evidence to you base any of these claims on?
bengalslash 9 months ago
Zeolite Powder Cures Autism Mercury Poisoning. Do NOT Vaccinate your children.
AutismIsMercury 1 year ago
population control! watch out for the new world order!
oceanrose12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If vaccines cause autism it is less than 1% of kids so affected. The only way to find the truth is to look for it... in clinical studies comparing truly purified vaccine (antigen and innocuous carrier fluid) to the toxic vaccines we currently inject our kids with
Shills fight this simple solution to the devasting effects vaccines may be having on our children
The lies/deceptions shills use against the autism/vaccine theory makes me believe it all the more
Why do they have to lie?
michael0156 2 years ago
Regardless of whether or not vaccines cause autism, I think our country is overvaccinated. I will not get flu, chicken pox, etc vaccines because I feel they contribute to an era of dependence on drugs, needles etc.
After enough people get vaccinated from whatever illness, it will probably mutate, leading to another vaccine. And you can see the cycle. People have gotten the flu for many years. Let them get it and build up their immune systems instead of trying to overdoctorize our society.
ImperfectLaura 2 years ago
@ImperfectLaura you can't "build up" your immune system. It's already built.
bengalslash 9 months ago
@bengalslash Wow wordy much? Boost your immune system then. Whatever. What I said has been said by many before. Google "build up your immune system" and you'll see plenty of links offering different kinds of advice on how they think you should do that. I don't agree with all of them, but build up your immune system is a pretty common phrase used by many sides.
ImperfectLaura 8 months ago
@ImperfectLaura how would you build it? Would you engineer new complement? Would you recombine gene segments to produce new lymphocyte receptors? Feed your macrophages to make them bigger? Increase their ability to phagocytosize bacteria and dead cells? Facilitate the uptake of antigen by antigen presenting cells for eventual clonal selection by lymphocytes??? "common phrase used by many sides"? Please, "boost/build" you immune system is a quack phrase. How does one "boost"?
bengalslash 8 months ago
@bengalslash I've been told by people who support vaccination that vaccines boost your immune system. And obviously, I've been told something very different from the other side. I'm not sure whether your issue is with that particular word or with my point. If it's with my point as a whole, then we actually have something to talk about. If it's with my word choice, then I have nothing more to add. It's stupid to get that wordy on youtube.
ImperfectLaura 8 months ago
@ImperfectLaura so now TOO wordy. I don't understand your notion that you shouldn't be specific when addressing a topic. What credible medical evidence makes you think immunization "leads" to dependence on drugs? DNA viruses mutates at a much lesser rate then RNA viruses because of the "spell check" type mechanism of dna polymerase. In most cases it does not matter if it mutates because those highly conserved epitopes can be taken advantage of.
bengalslash 8 months ago
@bengalslash I mean more that my opinion of vaccines is a combination of scientific personal & religious beliefs. I don't have enough characters nor do I wish to discuss something like that fully on youtube.You want to disagree with me? Fine, vaccines are a complex & personal thing.I just don't agree with you attacking 1 little phrase & discounting my whole argument.It's what I believe & I've researched it. I'm not going to waste the time & energy debating those who don't want to get my point.
ImperfectLaura 8 months ago
@ImperfectLaura Not to be argumentative or anything but if your position on vaccines is based ANYTHING besides science, your position really can't be upheld as factual and true because religion and their various beliefs are not fact and everyone believes something different. Faith and passion don't have any place when making a scientific determination and if science has proven, over and over and over, unable to find a vax/asd link, then these beliefs that there is one are in fact not factual.
TheRealVenna 8 months ago
@TheRealVenna My personal belief is a combo of those 3. I've looked at it from all 3 angles & that's what I've come up with. If you come up with something else that's fine for you. And I have no connection to autism & don't really base my decision to vaccinate on the autism thing. My position is more about the quantity of things that are vaccinated for & how some of the diseases really aren't that life threatening to someone in my circumstance. I support informed consent either way you choose.
ImperfectLaura 8 months ago
@ImperfectLaura I didn't actually "attack" you originally. I stated a fact. You may think you have a point, yet you provide no evidence from which you based that belief on.
bengalslash 8 months ago
@ImperfectLaura If your beliefs about vaccines have nothing to do with autism, you really don't have anything to add to this particular topic, since that's what this topic is about. While I see your point about some vaccines (E.g. flu and chicken pox [though people die from flu every year]) most vaccines in question are given to children to prevent life threatening diseases. And have you ever cared for a child suffering from chicken pox? That might change your mind about the vax for it.
TheRealVenna 8 months ago
ironic is the worst and most effective type of shill, but he is not very good at it,
He tries to appear as an objective person making "obvious" statements agaainst a vaccine autism link. but he spits out the same subjective, lying rhetorical garbage of Big Pharma and the FDA/CDC official lines
Stop Hurting Kids ironon
Go to an autistic center and donate some time helping the victims of your craft
michael0156 2 years ago
Ironic says "Lots of Pubmed studies are flawed" Really? Give me some examples ironic
Ironic said "You can't use them to prove vaccines are unsafe but then distrust [others]..." and he also says trusting all Pubmed studies would be idiotic. Then he claims he doesn't see a problem with those 2 statements
Insidiously he says vaccines may cause autism & it's a proximate cause. Then says the chance is too slim to waste resources studying it
This is Big Pharma's position, not objective, not proved
michael0156 2 years ago
irononheroes, more shill generalizing lies. There are many good people in medicine/scientific research/regulatory agencies. They must work, provide for their families. Speaking out comes with substantial risk of unemployment. Jon Fishbein, David Graham, Frances Kelsey, Eric Topol, Steven Nissen are 5 government employees who withstood attacks from govt/industry. Hundreds have not fared so well. Some notables; Andrew Wakefield, Arpad Pusztai, Brooksley Born, Mark Purdey - heroes defending truth
michael0156 2 years ago
Irononheroes seems to be a paid misinformant. People like him spout utter nonsense of the sort no rational person would ever believe in.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Holy moly if anyone is a shill it is Andrew Wakefield!!!! You know how much money he has made selling.....VACCINES?
irononheroes 2 years ago
"You know how much money Wakefield has made selling.....VACCINES?"
He was just filling a perceived (but false) need, which is what all vaccinating doctors are doing. .
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
...and patented it so that only he could benefit from the profits...It's just silly to say that "he has not fared so well".
Lots of doctors go rogue, that does not make them better sources of information. Different viewpoints are critical and necessarily provocative, but to intentionally turn the public against the mainstream (with bad science) in order to line one's pockets is reprehensible. And you may think he was just filling a need, I think he created that need in order to fill it.
irononheroes 2 years ago
All students of biology and all med school students and interns need to be told that once they enter the field they will become evil! They must be taking classes on how to be callous, calculating killers. The ones specializing in pediatrics especially. I bet they just can't WAIT to stick poisons into helpless kids to give them debilitating illnesses! A life long dream! Wait, was that just a little bit smarmy? Must be spending too much time in these comment boards/echo chambers.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Now, wait just a minute, I have pediatricians and doctors in my immediate family and my younger daughter's goal is to become a pediatrician. Believe it or not, they agree with the views that vaccinations are not a "one size fits all" and there are dangers that are not addressed.
truvelocity 2 years ago
So do I . That is not enough to say that they are "evil" just because there are complications and some occasional adverse reactions/events.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Comment removed
michael0156 2 years ago
While you guys research if vaccines harm, we'll opt out of vaccines for now, is that ok with you? For now, we see em droppin like flies after vaccination.
chiropractic47 2 years ago
well, not exactly "like flies"....
irononheroes 2 years ago
They are in too Deep to admit to a link.
He said it "The government would be responsible for all the children for the rest of their lives"
Parents and Doctor don't want to admit that they put their Patients and Children at risk
Its worst that letting a child molester baby sit . At least I know what to expect and who
and what we are Dealing with.
Mercury (Thermisol) a known Poison in any Form
Crimes Against Our Children KNOWINGLY
Deserves No Less Than First Degree Murder Charges
zgadgets 2 years ago
translantic is a paid employee of a pharmaceutical company . You are absolutely right about the number of Autistic children increasing with each additional vaccine . Also thimerosal is only one of about a dozen troubling substances in vaccines like: phenols , monkey DNA , Formaldehyde , and Aluminum . All great things for your kids growing body .
bobyjhousinit 2 years ago
Doctors are 3 times as likely to exempt their own children from vaccination in the USA !! Every time the number of vaccines given to children increases , the percentage of Autistic , ADHD , and learning disabled children increases as well . There have been multiple studies showing these links , as translantic well knows . There are at least a dozen posts where this information is sited , but he always denies them and then says they do not exist .
bobyjhousinit 2 years ago
"Doctors are 3 times as likely to exempt their own children from vaccination in the USA"
Yes, that's true, because educated people make educated decisions.
Studies on Pubmed sponsored by those who have a vested interest don't count.
Sorry, don't trust the pharmaceutical industry. No, actually, I'm not sorry.
truvelocity 2 years ago
That statement about the doctors is false. they do.
Those disorders are worrisome, but there could also be links to fetal distress during birth, c-sections, plastics, pesticides, any number of things can "turn on " a latent gene for brain disorders.
irononheroes 2 years ago
truvelocity 2 years ago
But you don't trust Pubmed Studies....right? So are all the studies you mention above...corrupted by big Pharma? Should I even bother looking them up if they have been sponsored by a vested interest?
irononheroes 2 years ago
I trust Pubmed Studies that are done with the correct protocol, regardless of who's funding it But, then you have those who would say the same for alternative companies that manufacture enzymes that cure cancer. Double standard!
truvelocity 2 years ago
ironic says "You don't trust PubMed studies... right?"
Do you trust ALL pubmed studies sweetie?
If you do I have some for you, but please tell me that all pubmed studies are truthful, please tell me that Big Pharma doesn't twist scientsits arms or bribe them to do what is wanted, please tell me that no bad science is done by any pharmaceutical company or funded by some of these companies... pleeeeese?
michael0156 2 years ago
Any study is worth looking at if it is done scientifically, regardless of funding, regardless of the outcome.
irononheroes 2 years ago
ironic says "any study is worth looking at if it is done scientifically..."
Of course, the truth is always refreshing. but ironic doesn't address the questions I asked him, ANY OF THEM. Shills are not interested in the truth, just stating the obvious in an attempt to look reasonable so they can ply their trade, which is lies to support big pharma
Stop hurting kids ironic
michael0156 2 years ago
sorry, what other questions did you ask? No, I don't trust all studies, on PubMed or not.
And what on earth makes you think I support anything or anyone in particular?
irononheroes 2 years ago
ironic, do you trust all pubmed studies?
This is a simple yes or no answer.
Stop hurting kids, shill
michael0156 2 years ago
Do I trust them all? Trust has nothing to do with it. The answer is no, that would be idiotic.
irononheroes 2 years ago
You better amke up your mind shill
Ironic says "Do I trust them all [PubMed studies]... no, that would be idiotic"
But previously ironic said to me regarding PubMed studies "You can't use them (Pubmed studies) to prove vaccines are unsafe but then distrust the ones that don't give you the result you want"
Learn how to think and remember, Stop shilling for big pharma
michael0156 2 years ago
I have not been inconsistent.
Lots of PubMed studies are on the site are flawed -- that doesn't make it a less valuable source for research. You have to know how to scrutinize a study.
There are good studies and bad...I don't really see what the problem is.
Do you know how to tell if a study is valuable or if it can be disregarded?
irononheroes 2 years ago
You can't use them (Pubmed studies) to prove vaccines are unsafe but then distrust the ones that don't give you the result you want.
irononheroes 2 years ago
The whole medical-pharmaceutical establishment is IMO an organised criminal enterprise set up to defraud people and to monopolise sickness care (including sickness creation, via vaccinations, under the guise of "disease prevention"). This does not mean that doctors are evil, only that they are trapped in an evil system.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
The pharma-establishment is not all one big monopoly. Companies compete with one another for business, for contracts. we have a free market. They want to sell drugs; nothing too opaque about it. I wish I was a paid informant! That would entitle getting paid! I have no love for the pharma companies believe me, but sanitation and vaccination are two things the modern world has brought that have helped milions of people live where nature would have pinged off the weakest on their own.
irononheroes 2 years ago
The claim that vaccines have saved millions of lives is a myth promoted by the medical-harmaceutical establishment, irononheroes. The truth s that vaccines have never protected or saved anyone, let alone saved millions of lives. I have three photo albums of infectious diseases graphs on my 'Vaccination Information Network' on facebook which clearly show that vaccines had no influence whatsoever on the remarkable decline in the mortality from infectious diseases over the past century.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
The medical-pharmaceutical industry may appear to be composed of a number of competing entities, but in reality it's all one big organised criminal enterprise. That does not mean that many if not most of the people who work in it are not dedicated and well-meaning health professionals and that some of what they do is not beneficial, but behind it all there is greed for power and money, utter ruthlessness and a population control and reduction agenda they are not aware of.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
well, if there is a population control agenda they are doing a piss-poor job. Surely it can't be too difficult to kill off a couple of billion people and make it look like an epidemic? Why are we still so overpopulated? Or is the plan so insidious it will take a hundred more years, since vaccines have been with us the same amount of time...?
irononheroes 2 years ago
So far the genocidal agenda has been implemented according to the principle of "boiling the frog slowly," except for tainted vaccines given to Africans, causing devastation via AIDS; experimental hep B vaccine given to US gays which also caused them to died from AIDS, and experimental vaccines given to US soldiers which have killed thousands (due to vaccine-induced Gulf War Syndrome).
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
The so-called swine flu and the vaccination campaign is being staged to create a killer flu pandemc similar to the one in 1918, which was also vaccine-induced.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Gulf War Illness (no longer a syndrome-and NOT deadly) was systematically assessed by doctors both within and outside of the military. Pesticide exposure or toxic coatings on their uniforms are possible, but nothing is certain, though the anthrax vaccines have been ruled out. I have a good source on this, you cannot use GWI -- and I can put you in touch with the source. Plus, the US gov't offers full compensation for sufferers. Again, a lame way to kill people--with headaches and rashes.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Gulf War Syndrome is called a syndrome because there was supposedly no clearly recognisable cause. Syndrome or Illness - the fact is that thousands of veterans wave died from it. many are sick and dying. The veterans were told it was all in their head and given psychiatric drugs, while life-saving medical treatment was being withheld from them. The soldiers had been given experimental vaccines which sickened and killed them, among them soliders who were never deployed overseas.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Google 'Scott Siefken.' Scott suffered a severe skin problem as a result of vaccination. 90% of his skin was eventually surgically removed. He died a short time later. You can find a photo of Scott on Google Images.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
I know that GWI has harmed lots of people, no one disputes that, least of all the government which offers compensation and recognition. But I wonder why, out of all the things that it could be, do you focus on the vaccines? If the military experimented on the troops secretly, they could have put microorganisms in their water. Or exposed them to undetectable amounts of gases or pathogens in the air. If anything they would test bio-weapons that Iraq had, which were not vaccines.
irononheroes 2 years ago
"Will it take a hundred more years?"
No, the swine flu vaccine, which is in fact a bioweapon, is designed to take care of things. I have just spoken to a Thai man this afternoon who was given a swine flu shot as part of a vaccine trial in September and who now has no strength in the right side of his body and can hardly walk.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
This has happened to a number of people who took part in the trial, and some have died, but there is total media silence about it.
Anyone who takes a swine flu shot runs the risk of disablement and/or death.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
That is true, any vaccine has possible side effects that include all kinds of nasty reactions and even death. They do not deny or try to hide that fact.
So...since the H1N1 shot is in fact a bioweapon can we expect then, that in a few months everyone who took the vaccine will start experiencing the effects of the Thai gentleman you spoke of?
irononheroes 2 years ago
"any vaccine has possible side effects"
They are not "side-effects" irononheroes.
The harm vaccines cause is the intended purpose behind them. Vaccines are given to PROMOTE ill-health, NOT to prevent it.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
And yes, according to US neurosurgeon and health educator Dr Russell Blaylock MD (and others), people who take the swine flu shot can look forward to severe illness and a premature death. The casualties will be blamed on the swine flu (a mutated strain), which will cause many more people to get vaccinated, and in turn to get ill and die. This is in fact how the "Spanish flu" in 1918 came about.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Okay, okay, I know that is your point (that the intent of vaccines it to harm) , but I'm trying to get at WHY you have decided that is so. Yes, there have been unfortunate adverse events, but so far, with H1N1, not that many. It has been heralded as a very successful and safe campaign. So are you saying that the effects will simply be delayed so that it will not be easy to trace?
irononheroes 2 years ago
"So are you saying that the effects will simply be delayed so that it will not be easy to trace?"
Take Gulf War Illness. Whether it was vaccine-induced (as I believe it mainly was) is beside the point here. Thousands have died, and many more have become ill, yet there has been a virtual media black-out about it and many were denied medical treatment. It will no doubt be the same with swine flu vaccine injuries.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic was also vaccine-related, but 90 years later this is still not acknowledged by the establlshment responsible. for obvious reasons, just as it falsely maintains that vaccines have saved miliions of lives.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Acknowledged by the establishment? You don't see astronomers debating with or even acknowledging the Flat Earth Society, not because there is a cover up but because it would waste everyone's time.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Your whole point is that vaccines are the cause of harm and that pandemics and all kinds of other illness were created by vaccines. You must see that this is a crazy assertion given the evidence.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Dr Russell Blaylock benefits from people fearing vaccines.
He sells supplements for $50 for a month's supply that will "repair" your brain. How can I take the word of someone like that? How can you?
irononheroes 2 years ago
Ironic talks about blaylaock benefitign from something useless he convinces people to buyt
big Pharma has hundred's of examples of useless deadly "medicines" whose effects they cover up while people are injured/die from their use.
Yet ironic continues to defend big pharma by denying there could ever be a connection between vaccines and autism
Stop you rlying and deflection ironic. Stop hurting kids. Start telling the truth
michael0156 2 years ago
Show me where I denied that vaccines could cause autism. Show me where I defend "Big Pharma".
At the very least, there are government restrictions on any medication that makes any sort of claim, and there are standards of testing and trials required to show safety. And we hear about deaths from drugs like Oxycontin, fen-phen, etc.
The fact that there are correlations with vaccines and autism does not prove causality. Vaccines could very well cause autism. But where is the proof???
irononheroes 2 years ago
Do you believe diseases occur in nature and that humans and animals are killed and made ill by pathogens?
irononheroes 2 years ago
There is NO RIGOROUS RESEARCH BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH.!
SharMess 2 years ago 2
cos everybody that has ever studied science has done it because they are evil.... why don't you study medicine/biology and do some yourself
egodiosest 2 years ago
Science ISN'T taking into account WHY illness results WHEN it does. Federal government doesn't want to be responsible for HARMING people when they have, because it will break the bank. Where's your brain? Thank God there are researchers and doctors stepping forward to admit the truth about vaccines harming children and taking steps to protect the public's health.
I was disabled 10 years ago by a tetaus shot and I can't walk anymore. What do you know about this subject?
SharMess 2 years ago
were you able to get any compensation for your disability?
irononheroes 2 years ago
This doctor exposes the truth of the systme's intentions when he refers to children as "possessions" and "commodities" at 2:07. How may vaccinations can wel $ELL? Never mind how many may be screwed up along the way. What a phony piece of crap!
SharMess 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
PMID: 15446391; 12880876; 12949291; 14519711; 16919130; 18791815; 15858952; 14754936; 11222420; 11850369; 15342825; 15342856; 19128068; 17168158; 19015994; 18172138; 18482737; 18180424; 18180423
try deny this
transtlantic 2 years ago
wow.... my comments are so buried...Toxicology of thiomersal:
Clarkson TW (2002). "The three modern faces of mercury". Environ Health Perspect 110 (S1): 1123. PMID 11834460Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006). "The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds". Crit Rev Toxicol 36 (8): 60962. doi:10.1080/10408440600845619. PMID 16973445
Pichichero ME, . (2008). "Mercury levels in newborns and infants after receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccines".Pediatrics 121(2):e20814
transtlantic 2 years ago
You know when people be lying when they dance around the fuckin question.
Kinghercules 2 years ago
This doctor also asks: "Why do most children have absolutely no problem with vaccines?" There is a whopping le right there, for a start. In fact EVERY CHILD IS A VACCINE-INJURED CHILD, regardless of whether the damage is visible or not. Vaccines are devastating for children's develping brains and immune systems. Few children escape relatively unscathed.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
you have no proof that vaccines do more damage, than say... for example pertussis, tetanus, diphteria, .... put together.
you keep not giving any explanation to why vaccines could even affect the brain Vax
transtlantic 2 years ago
"Give proof that vaccines do more damage, than say.pertussis, tetanus, diphteria, .... put together."
No reliable statistics are available because there is no mandatory reporting of vaccine reactions or deaths anywhere in the world, nor are there any studies comparing the health of vaccinated with that of unvaccinated children. I wonder why. Would it by ay chance be that the truth of how devastating vaccines are must not be known!
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
vax -- you blocked me from your videos, are you afraid of me?
"reliable statistics"? but if you pick graphs from the places where you accuse of not being reliable...
and there is studies that compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated people: hospital records. or you so ignorant and crazy to forget to read the data from this sources.
transtlantic 2 years ago
"there is studies that compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated people: hospital records."
Your grammar is as shocking as your thinking. Anyway, where are the hospital records you talk about made accessible to the public?
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
records are in thehealth department, or you can go to the hospital and make a request for it, for research purposes.
sorry for my english, i try to improve it every day, but we can change the disussion to Portuguese if you want.
transtlantic 2 years ago
I try to improve my Englsih every day"
Sorry, I didn't know that Englsih wasn't your first language. Does that mean though that people form Portugal are as brain-washed about vaccination as people from anywhere else in the world?
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i try to stick to individuals not a country when i try to insult anyone vax....
transtlantic 2 years ago
Well, then, what is VAERS?
irononheroes 2 years ago
VAERS is the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System which serves to record adverse events following vaccination on a voluntary basis. Because few doctors bother to report adverse vaccine deaths and injuries, it is generally estimated that only 1 - 10 % of actual reactions are reported/recorded.
The (rather troubling) VAERS figures therefore have to be multiplied by a factor of 90 - 99 to get an approximately true figure of actually occurring deaths and reactions.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
VAERS contd.
Also, the adverse events recorded are mostly the serious reactions. Then there are the hundreds of thousands of children who suffer minimal post-vaccinal encephalopathies (minor, in many cases almost imperceptible) brain damage following vaccination. This may then translate into developmental problems including speech and learning disorders and all the rest of it, yet a connection to vaccination may never even be considered. The same is true for childhood cancers and leukemias.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Do you also take into effect the adverse reactions reported that are not serious, but made by people claiming the reaction to be serious? You know, of course, that if I call in to report to VAERS that my skin fell off and I grew a second head they have to take my report seriously and record all the details?
I think your assumption that the number needs to be multiplied by a factor of 90-99 is, not a figure based in reality, not sure how you came to that multiplier.
irononheroes 2 years ago
From the FDA webpage 'Vaccines, Blood and Biologics':
The incidence rate (how often events occur) cannot be calculated from VAERS data, because not all events are reported and the exact number of administered doses cannot be known.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
VAERS data are from a passive surveillance system and represent unverified reports of adverse events temporally associated with one or more vaccines. Such data are subject to limitations of under-reporting, simultaneous administration of multiple vaccine antigens, reporting bias, and lack of incidence rates in unvaccinated comparison groups.
Why is such a shoddy system not replaced with a scientific one? The reason is self-explanatory.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Did you hear this? This doctor said that "Our children are our most precious commodity.." A commodity? Vaccines are indeed the goose that lays the golden eggs for the medical-pharmaceutical industry - from the sale of vaccines, and from the treatment of the the wide-spread harm vaccines cause! Precious - commodity? Right! Like girl's and young women's "pelvic goldmines" currently exploited by means of Merck's magic crap Gardasil vaccine.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
you keep forgetting that pharma corp loses money with the vaccines....
transtlantic 2 years ago
"you keep forgetting that pharma corp loses money with the vaccines"
Yes, sure. The course of 3 shots of Merck's crap experimental Gardasil vaccine alone costs several hundred dollars. It costs tax-payers thousands of dollars to have a child fully vaccinated.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Comment removed
transtlantic 2 years ago
"because of diseases easily avoided if the population did not get vaccinated."
You got that something right for a change. Diseases such as diabetes, meningitis and autism are indeed easliy avoided if people are not vaccinated.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
something was lost in my argument while i was translating my thoughts to english, sorry, i'll say it again: if people do not get vaccinated. it costs more to the tax payers to support for hospital care and antibiotics for diseases that could have been prevented
transtlantic 2 years ago
Governments and the medicalpharmaceutical establishment are in this criminal eneterprise together. The interviewer was excellent, The doctor's preformance was quite revealing, especially referring to our young as a precious rescource, considering that he and his colleagues routinely maim and kill babies and children by injecting them with highly toxic vaccines.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
check "toxic" concept....
never seen a doctor "kill" a baby.
But i've seen some people do it, like the vegans, the no-vax,....
transtlantic 2 years ago
Ha ha I must admit I have a hard time picturing vegans being strong enough to kill anything...
irononheroes 2 years ago
One of the mistakes often made is that the Autism spectrum is a result of the same causal factors for all individuals. That is highly unlikely.
My family is prone to non-regressive autism and therefore I believe the cause in that case to be genetic or at least mostly genetic. However, I have spoken to intelligent parents who claim that their child regressed after the MMR. IMO it's patronising to dismiss their observations as coincidently noticing the symptoms for the first time.
shuckydog 3 years ago
I agree that it is patronizing.
irononheroes 2 years ago
Most children who get vaccines are NOT "pefectly fine". Every vaccinated child is a vaccine-injured child, even if it isn't obvious. Vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise. Vaccines DO NOT prevent diseases. They can't admit a connection, for the reasons stated on this video. The claims for compensation would be enormous.
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch the youtube video "CDC Chief Admits that Vaccines Trigger Autism". When watching this video, it becomes rather obvious that this whole vaccine business is an organised criminal enterprise.
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
MY GRANDSON was VACCINATED WITH MMR AND FLU shots AT ONCE, HE IS IN THE HOSPITAL WITH A HORRID SKIN RASH COVERED FROM HEAD TO TOE. HE IS TESTED POSITIVE FOR MEASELS, MONO, EPSTEIN BARR, AND ONE OTHER I CAN'T REMEMBER. IT IS HORRID! I HAVE PHOTOS I will post on YOUTUBE SOON. HE IS 1 YEAR OLD AND IN QUARENTINED. IT MAKES ME SICK TO MY STOMACH I hope he has a chance!!! Dr's are stumped. dahhh
Young mothers think twice!!!!
zantinite 3 years ago
I was sorry to hear this. How is your grandson now?
irononheroes 2 years ago
my son has changed after vaccination..he was a perfect little baby before his enjection,he was eye contacting,after his enjection he has changed,every time I mention this to his doctor,they are telling me '' NO there is no evidence injection can cause it'' :((( I can't make my voice heard :((
NostaljiRuzgari 3 years ago 3
"I can't make my voice heard"
That's because vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise. The harm done is not an accident, it's intentional.
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
I am so sorry to hear about your son. But there are many things that could happen to make him change. People don't make note of every situational event when children have a developmental shift, but it seems to correlate to vaccines because of confirmation bias. It is important to look for other things that could have happened and not be so committed to the vaccine theory for the sake of being thorough, Consider what else may be at play, and be open. That is the best way to advocate for him.
irononheroes 2 years ago
If someone lies in the middle of the road with internal injuries and broken bones, these could have been caused by any of a number of factors, including being struck with satellite debris. The most likely cause is however still vehicle impact.
It's strange that when babies or children are injected with toxic vaccines, any problem that occurs couldn't possibly have been caused by the vaccine, as vaccines are said to be safe. Talk about idiocy!
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Yes, you are right. When it happens around the time a vaccine happens, it's easy to tie the two together. But what about all the kids who develop problems 6 months after? Or from birth? Or a year later...or in kids not vaccinated? I suppose you will make any occurence fit your theory. I could do the same thing. ..Electro-magnetic fields--have you noticed how autism has increased with the number of electronic devices people bring into their homes?? Or preservatives in foods? or GM foods
irononheroes 2 years ago
You are quite right, irononheroes. The illnesses and disorders in children (and adults are caused by any of a number of factors, including those you mentioned, or any combination of them.
However, vaccination is clearly as a major source of disturbance, as the poisoning of the organism with the neurotoxic and allergenic biological and chemical agents represents a major assault on the immature and developing immune and nervous systems.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Contd.
The absence of short- and long-term studies comparing the health of vaccinated with those of unvaccinated children is a clear indication of the criminal nature of vaccination as an ideology and that - far from it being a method of disease prevention - it is in fact an organised criminal enterprise disguised as health protection.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Kids with the most vaccines live in the west. Kids with the fewest vaccines live in developing countries. Where will you find cholera, malaria, rubella, polio, pertussis, diptheria etc etc in the highest numbers? Which children (or teens, or adults) will have the best health if given physical examinations determining overall health? Do you want me to put you in touch with an African-based epidemiologist --do you know what he would say? What do you consider "health"-what are your criteria?
irononheroes 2 years ago
Kids are sicker in developing countries because of malnutrition, unclean drinking water and vaccines. They are healthier in developed nations because of better living conditions. Google 'Dr A Kalokerinos inteview.'
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Did he call our children a "commodity"? WHAT KIND OF FUCKED UP PEOPLE WORK IN GOVERNMENT! Vaccinate their ass, if they get autism then it's for the public good!!!
RogerDodger69 3 years ago 2
"Did he call our children a "commodity"?
Yes he did. Obviously because this commodity is there to satisfy his sadistic tendencies by sticking needles into them, while at the same time reaping financial rewards. It's a paradise for psychopaths like him.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
so...people who use seeds and weeds to heal are fine?
transtlantic 2 years ago
"so...people who use seeds and weeds to heal are fine?"
I certainly would choose one of THE rather than oncologists who use WW1 chemical warfare poisons to cure cancer.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
vax--- you blocked me from your videos, therefore you must be afraid from my reasonable arguments...
oncologists heal more cancers using medical knowledge than any of the frauds who use seeds and weeds.
transtlantic 2 years ago
"oncologists heal more cancers using medical knowledge"
I reckon that their treatments kill the patients quicker than the cancer does. I guess they consider it a cure of sorts: "the patient doesn't suffer from cancer any more...only, he's unfortunately dead!" Hmmm...
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w8 vax you assuming again.... tell the source saying that oncologists kill the patients more quickly than the cancer itself. don't link bogus websites, but papers please.
and could you please ublock me from your videos, or you just afraid of my arguments?
transtlantic 2 years ago
"tell the source saying that oncologists kill the patients more quickly than the cancer itself"
Yes, me. Also others, like Edward G Griffin in his book and video "World without Cancer", or Moss in his book about the corrupt Cancer Industry. As the saying goes, there are more people making a living from cancer than die from it", and "there is a lot more money to be made from looking for a cancer cure than there is from finding a cancer cure."
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice, more conspiracy talk and no actual research to prove your point....
again:; check hospital records and see for yourself for the truth. try not to use people like Edward G Griff to prove your claims. a film producer is hardly a source of credibility to prove anyones point.
transtlantic 2 years ago
"Edward G Griffin"
I hasve met Edward. He's a fine man who has done outstanding research on a number of issues - unlike the usefukl idiots and willing fools who work for vaccination mafia or in the cancer industry.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w8....you actually claiming that griffin has made research? LOL, please explain here where he has gone for "research"...you'll be surprised how much bias he is sitting on and how much money he is making for himself for fooling people like you.... and you call "mafia" the pharma corp....
transtlantic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
btw vax, you keep blocking me in your videos, are you afraid of me?
transtlantic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and before you start talking griffin nonsense: "A 2006 Cochrane review of the evidence concluded "The claim that Laetrile has beneficial effects for cancer patients is not supported by data from controlled clinical trials." "laetrile was tested on 14 tumor systems, and a Sloan-Kettering press release concluded that "laetrile showed no beneficial effects"."
transtlantic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"a Sloan-Kettering press release concluded that "laetrile showed no beneficial effects"."
SK would say that , wouldn't they. They are the people who make lots of money from poisoning people with toxic drugs under the guise of "cancer therapy".
I find the history of the cancer industry far more interesting than the laetrile issue, as it goes back to IG Farben under Nazi Germany.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and here we go again.... david icke like conspiracy..... and no regard to the fact that selling medication is like selling any other product.... everyone wants to make a profict out of it.
transtlantic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Do vaccines cause autism" - the answer is NO VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM THEY CAUSE VACCINE DAMAGE THAT MIRRORS SOME OF THE SYMPTOMS OF AUTISM - BY OPENING UP THE DIAGNOSIS CRITERA ON AUTISM THE VAXERS TRIED TO HIDE WHAT THEY WERE DOING. AUTISM IS GENETIC AND ITS THE NEXT STEP IN HUMAN EVOLUTION - WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE LAUNCHING A HATE CAMPAIGN AGAINST AUTISTICS MAKING IT LOOK AS IF ITS MUTATED BAD GENETICS A DISEASE!!!
MzTruthSeerUK 3 years ago
Very naive to think that the government is here for our best interest
antibacterialgel 3 years ago 7
"Very naive to think that the government is here for our best interest"
Government AND vaccination are an organised criminal enterprise, and they are both in it together.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The government said that vaccines are good. Nothing more needs to be said. The government would not lie tous. The government is here to help us. If it weren't for the government we would all die of starvation or diseases or murderers. People need to stop questioning the good and holy government. Do what you are told. They know better than all of us.
rockman1969 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there is no evidence at all. move on...
hockeytownjack 3 years ago
there is such an obvious link!!!! Why don't u people get it!!
savannah3520 3 years ago 10
i know!!!! my brother is a perfect example.... born normal then vaccinated.... now has autism....
kristinaheckel 3 years ago 9
"my brother is a perfect example.... born normal then vaccinated.... now has autism...."
Sorry to hear that. Watch the 5-part youtbe series 'Vaccination: Miracle or Mayhem?'
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
"there is such an obvious link!!!! Why don't u people get it!!"
Indeed. It's a case of "None are so blind as those who do not want to see!"
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
where is the obvious link?
transtlantic 2 years ago
Mercury is a red herring. It's the flouride in the water, not the mercury! Aaaaaaah!
NoemieArmstrong 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
anajouse 3 years ago
"It's the flouride in the water, not the mercury!"
It's both - and also the aluminum in vaccines, as well as vaccines that don't have mercury in them. Watch the youtube video 'Creating a nation of zombies.'
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
I got a place for them to start- stop using MERCURY in the vaccines.....
Soobriety 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
I pee in the vaccine and I pee on dead niggers
bimmmy 3 years ago
my fathers friend got autism from a vaccine
pivot3214313 3 years ago 3
I got diabetes from fucking vaccines.
TripleGangstaX3Mitze 3 years ago 6
"I got diabetes from fucking vaccines"
I'm sorry, but not surprised, to hear it. In According to a letter by Dr B Classen published in the New Zealand Medical Journal, there was a 60% increase in insulin-dependent diabetes in children following the first hep B vaccination campaign, some years ago. Dr Classen expected a similar ncrease to follow hib vaccination campaign which was being announced at the time.
vaccineshurtbabies 3 years ago
another lie from vax....
transtlantic 2 years ago
"another lie from vax...
You lose every time, cause I have truth on my side. On googling 'Classen hep B vaccine causes diabetes', I came up with 10,100 entries.
Dr Classen's letter was published in the New Zealand Medical Journal of 24 May 1997.
Now go and eat your hat.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
omg...that diabetes case! what shall i do?
here: first the disease HVB is linked to diabetes, not the vaccines. that is a common mistake made by the ignorant anti-vax.
second: dr Classen promotes immunization, is proven wrong in many subjects( he should be more carefull) and is not against vaccines.
now go and read the books about health that i keep posting
transtlantic 2 years ago
You said I was lying when I said that Dr Classen had a letter published in the NZMJ in which he said that the hep B vaccine had caused a 60 % increase in juvenile diabetes. I have shown you that my claim was correct, and you don't like it, so you go off into a number of unrelated arguments. I recokon you are a troll paid by the vax mafia to discredit anti--vaxers and their arguments.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
1) vax, you've blocked me from your videos, that shows how afraid you are from my arguments.
2) i read the letter and some of the work of dr. classen, most has a very bad critic, mainly he does not do double-blind research.
3) i told you are lying because the relation to hep B and diabetes as nothing to do with the vaccine. and you can check literature, apart from the well reffuted dr classen.
Dr.Classen btw is not against vaccination,
transtlantic 2 years ago
"Dr.Classen btw is not against vaccination"
No he isn't; he's in may ways as brain-washed as the rest. But that was not what the argument was about. You (wrongly) disputed that a letter of his was published in the NZMJ in which he said that there had been a 60% increase in juvenile diabetes in children who had got the hep B shot,.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and i told you, after review and research, dr classen was not proven right. there is not an increase of diabetes because of vaccination, no link whatsoever of long term effects because of vaccination.
transtlantic 2 years ago
cool
mrtvman 3 years ago 4