It's called Time Slicing, or some just prefer to simply call it "Frozen Moment". To do it, you have a number of cameras set up next to each other and take a picture simultaneously. When you play these after each other in a movie sequence you get this effect that you're moving in frozen time.
To get a fluid movement like this you see in the movie above you need about 25 pictures a second.
Some of them are 5 secs so 125 cameras would be used, but
we got tools today that can make things look smother than they are, emulating new photographs between where there really isnt any. So if he used that, maybe we're looking at 75 cameras or even less.
any ideas how he did this ?
fizzyjerks 2 years ago
It's called Time Slicing, or some just prefer to simply call it "Frozen Moment". To do it, you have a number of cameras set up next to each other and take a picture simultaneously. When you play these after each other in a movie sequence you get this effect that you're moving in frozen time.
To get a fluid movement like this you see in the movie above you need about 25 pictures a second.
Some of them are 5 secs so 125 cameras would be used, but
Blomvik 2 years ago
we got tools today that can make things look smother than they are, emulating new photographs between where there really isnt any. So if he used that, maybe we're looking at 75 cameras or even less.
Blomvik 2 years ago
cheers sounds very matrix like just with slow shutter speed, i love it
fizzyjerks 2 years ago
I am speechless. How much work and vision would this simple 40 second ad have taken!!
spectrelives 4 years ago
really not that much... just a lot of money and the idea..
rjt123456 2 years ago
THIS IS AWESOME!
TheWorldsLimits 5 years ago