New BMW X6M and X5M Testing grounds in Arjeplog Sweden

[theCRMartin11]

IS THIS THE VIDEO FOR DEAF PEOPLE, WTF IS THIS? A NEW WAY OF TORTURE SAY ANYTHING.

[bennasi2003]

now that's what i call a playground

[ashystyle]

0:40 the wheels on the other side are not on snow but on asphalt!!

[ElKeeed]

@ashystyle thats the point dude, it can redirect the power. A standard car would just spin the wheels on the icy side.

[ashystyle]

@ElKeeed ok, i´get it =)

[ashystyle]

@ElKeeed get it, so they know if the xDrive works as it should and how it does. But i wonder if it could offroad as good as lets say a land rover or a land cruiser?

[ashystyle]

x6 the worst offroader.. !! just watch clarksson!

[cocosun84]

the stupid car ever

[zomgwtfbbqbagel]

such a great car. Think about it: trips with your friends and they will actually fit + luggage. ALso, if some dick wad at a stop light wants to race you and they're like "lol look at the piece of shit SUV/retard car" you just turn on your sport mode and fuck him up.

[borbonico92]

La mia m 3 la preferisco

[along5012]

BMW X6 da bestttttttttttt

[SWJbGood76]

which type of tires were they using for the test?????

[74Darkman]

hahaha....ffs, are you serious? What the hell has Germany to do with ANYTHING? It's like saying im an expert on Volvo since im swedish, which is completly rubbish. Just as i would say "hey a Volvo costs ### here in sweden, they don't cost more than ### in Mongolia!". Give it a break! If canadian guys have looked up the pricing in CANADA, they are talking about actual CANADIAN dollars. Not German euros. Reality check please...

[valld95]

can a ford handle that good in the snow i have never seen them try can someone tell me if the ford truck suv is just as good. in my opinion ford suvs arent that good in the winter we had a ford suv once and we had to put chains on it just to drive in the ice

[vyvynyl]

just cant believe they are faster then our m coupe the ///m3 and slightly faster from 0-60 then our ///m5 and prob keep up without problem with ///m6.btw prefer x5 over x6. x5 -> 5 seats. x6-> 4 seats

[tealover01]

why would anyone want to drive an almost 100 thousand dollar car with over 500 horsepower in the snow? not to mention twin turbo!

[ericdscheller]

@tealover01 Because times and places exist when there isn't snow. It's nice to have a fast vehicle that is also good in non-ideal weather situations.

[valld95]

@tealover01 um that car is not even 100 thousnd dollars its more like 50 grand bmw makes good luxury cars but they dont cost that much

[tealover01]

@valld95 in canada an x6m is $99,900.. m6 coupe is $121,300. corvettes and caddy's are over 100k here so you can't tell me that....

[valld95]

@tealover01 then you dont live in canada cause everytime i was at a bmw dealership the price was 50 grand and when i was at a gm dealership were they sell corvettes it cost 70 grand

[tealover01]

@valld95 i do live in canada. london ontario canada. maybe thats base pice, fully loaded are as i said

[hazemvirus]

@tealover01 i wonder why in canada cars are more expensive than in the US while the two countries are right beside each other and the CAD is almost equal to the USD.

[tealover01]

@hazemvirus simple answer, because america has their sh!t together and canada is messed up

[LamboK28992]

@hazemvirus more shitty taxes in canada

[hazemvirus]

@LamboK28992 if you own business in canada and you register the car on that business you pay only 5% but now thanks to the HST it wont make difference you pay 13% plus that extra 8% they added to the gas and now there is tire tax when you buy a car and before all of that, it starts in the USA from 89,000 and in canada 99,990 and the CAD is almost equal to the USD so WTF!

[MrBabirusa]

@valld95. Not quite $100k (with zero options) but not even close to $50k. Go to BMW North America website. Base cost is $89,000. You clearly were born in '95 or else you'd have some understanding of how much BMW SUV's cost.

[valld95]

@MrBabirusa i was born in germany i think i know a bit more on bmw's than you

[LuisTrac]

just amazing (:

[yumyumluckycharms]

Wow... doesnt even need chains for the snow :D

[wa7shlakers]

nice car ...

[2rip00]

i like the x5 front and the x6 back

[USBrooks]

im sure at the end they were just fuckin around hahaha

[HuangYiChao]

The last part of the video looks way too fun. I want one now.

[valld95]

@HuangYiChao me too

[blacksrt8cherokee]

prosche cayenne sucks major penis...i dont like the x5/x6 m's either, but i would certainly have it over the piece of shit cayenne

[thegino1989]

mamma mia che stabilitàà spono strepitoseee:P

[norcalnorway]

Its good to see what these cars are capable of doing if ever the need arose

[XFXBoard]

0:41, wow, amazing!

[iPvvntNoobs]

this is nuts

[PkColossal]

lucky bastards to come play with cars in snow like that :D

[LizaarBR]

talking seriously: X3 was developed to be driven at snow?

[sorinke]

No. But all new cars ( at least 95% of them) are taken to Arjeplog to be tested in extreme conditions (to see if the ABS ESP and other things work). If they do then the car will work anywhere :)

[amberts]

Fuckin sweet... Pickin up powder...

[teddyd2009]

i want one =[

[willy121rys]

X5M and X6M are stunning beasts that are top game!!!

[yelkin2]

agreed

[willy121rys]

Q7 and gl don't even compare you tard!!!

[stevomwa]

I wld pick a Q7 or GL any day!

[eletkricar]

liars!

i had x5

x5 in snow=0

then i buy q7

q7 in snow=10

[cinayet36]

:D:D

maybe you are right but you are speaking about a x5 but not about a x5m... thats a different

[LizaarBR]

i bought a snow pad. is faster, cheaper and i can carry in my bag xD

[MrSBPOWER]

VERY VERY GOODDDDDD!!!!!!!!!

[panos007ful]

the best

[foeunit]

Dumb shits cant afford this car and talk shit about it.

[EstorilEm]

Are you insane? People shell out TENS of thousands more for a FAR less useful Cayenne Turbo / Turbo S - not to mention this CRUSHES any Cayenne in every performance category, and is somehow more useful and fetches significant increases in fuel economy.

[Jamzkangster]

Only reason why people love Cayennes are well...It's a much softer ride, a little bit more luxurious as quality is concerned and well...It has the BRAND NAME OF THE PORSCHE.

With that said, i'd get the BMW x6M over it anyday!

[rangerover06sc]

@EstorilEm what?Please explain to me one way the x6 m is more usefull.Also seeing how these are SUVS,their are a few performance cateagoeries in which the cayenne is far more usefull like towing, off road capiblity, well in general everything you buy an suv for.I'm but judge a suv by how it goes is kinda buying the supercar that get the better mpg,if you do they you don't understand them at all!!

[mathiastheok]

Bah my JCB Fastrack handles better than that in the snow. And I can pull 15 tons with it.

: )

[a222266643266]

i agree pecsenyekacsa, especially in case of x6...it has 4 seats god damn it..

infiniti doesn't fit all of his description though

[theannoyingdogpoo]

xDrive > quattro

BMW > jacked up Volkswagen aka Audi

permanent 40%-60% xDrive with computer aided clutch diff > primitive mechanical diff in Audi

[neverlikedit2]

The X5M and the X6M have got the 4wheel steering system (active drive) from Renault. A german carmade that BUYS a concept from a Franch carmade. A miracle!

[kvetonp]

yeah because im sure that germans need to borrow engineering tips from the french. I doubt they bought it from them, the french probably just let them take it....... again.

[darzrav]

That looks mind blowingly fun.

[Gonco243]

0-100 in 4.3 sec weighs 5400lbs in change.

[tazzcaaarlovr]

those cars are awesome!

[pecsenyekacsa]

This is NOT my opinion because I dislike BMWs, its the same story for Porsche Cayennes, VW Tuaregs, Audi Q7s, etc.

Don't misunderstand me, I respect it as a technological advance, but its usefulness is questionable imho.

[BI2016]

Its 0-100km/h in 4.7 secs, that 0-60mph in 4.5 secs from the factory... I wouldnt be suprised if it did near 4 seconds dead.

[sasicool1]

haha, how can you put so strong BHP, in a car like that :) love GERMANY

[Xevisberi]

Look at these....

This is why German cars are totally different and you pay good money for one.

[theannoyingdogpoo]

Totally different than what?

This proving ground is Swedish. And these were Swedes that came up first with such elaborate safety and traction tests to evaluate their (and other) cars.

[gwadagansta]

that shit got so much torque it could climb the Fuji

[Riginator08]

Thats got more BHP than a Farrari F430 Thats boss

[liftedview]

4.4l V8 / 555hp

0-60mph in 4.7 sec

That's REALLY fast for a car that weighs almost 5000 LBS

[0600697]

my own space craft :)

[michelinov]

you can talk shit as long as you want fact is there isn't an SUv sav or whatever that drives better, it is even better than a lot of a new cars those are facts

[MegaAdvocate]

SUV ???? Ha ha ha. 1/2 X5 -

[pecsenyekacsa]

I like this car, its a masterpiece of engineering. However, I would NEVER buy such a car, even if I had won the lottery, 'cause people who buy them, have infiriority complex, and microp*nis.

[csia1084]

and what would that make anyone who buys a more expensive mercedes, porsche, ferrari, aston martin, lambo... ? Do all those people have bigger inferiority complex's and smaller penis's? maybe knowbody should buy fancy cars for fear of how those who can't afford them will judge them...

[pecsenyekacsa]

No, they dont. If I wanted to go fast, and I were rich, I'd rather buy a Lambo, Porsche, Maserati, etc. But not a two-and-a-half-ton behemoth that can barely take a corner, devours fuel, and is much slower than the ones mentioned. It just doesn't make sence. I understand that one can smash everyone to wreck in this one, if he had an accident, but buying a car just for that is dirtyness imho.

[csia1084]

not...what i was talking about...

[raptor206]

pecsenyekacsa, dude if you'd look at one of the top gear videos where they have like 6 or 8 top supercars running the most they can on like a gallon of fuel, you'd realize that they all devour fuel. The biggest loser didnt even get 1 mpg. 2nd Its not much slower than anything. Most Lambo's, Porsches, Maseratis are in mid 3s - mid 4's for 0-60, this does it in 4.7. And one big extra thing you get with this car unlike others: 2nd chance at life if you crash. Its not mostly carbon fiber like others

[pecsenyekacsa]

You're right, I undestand they all devour fuel. But what's the meaning of a car, that is:

-slower on the track then most sportscars

(don't tell me it outruns a 911 or an M6)

-less useful in everyday life, than any sporty sedan (parking??)

-consumes more fuel than any modern cars (due to its featherweight of 2,5 tons)

-it doesn't accelerate as fast as some sporty cars with 100 less hp.

-and finally: you drop tears if you have to take it into the dirt.

[michellehernandez3]

good point....

[L3galHustl3]

you are a pure retard

[FIRSTWINNER]

I HAVE A BIG DICK AND I OWN ONE

[MegaAdvocate]

ugly car

[laszbuni]

jealous pig ass hole it's faster than a cayenne turbo s and damn sexy

[geforce5700fx]

A great car sure, but not quite nice, it's still a SUV

[panikeffect]

a little unusual, but not ugly, see i don't relay like bmw, but i don't try to make my self believe something that is not true, so don't do that!