Added: 4 years ago
From: MRMdotORG
Views: 4,181
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey, Genius. There are hieroglyphs embedded in the pictures themselves. The most obvious (and simple) example is the Eye of Horus. There are seven hieroglyphs which make up the Eye of Horus. These hieroglyphs spell 'to make or do' or 'one who does.' This technique has been used in Arabic, Chinese Han Zi, and Japanese Kanji for thousands of years. I'm sure you already knew that, didn't you, Professor Knowitall?

  • Thank you! I was a Mormon for 28 years and this video shows the facts!

  • Switch to 240p to play this video. It is currently having a buggy problem with YouTube's servers.

  • I made a look between your draw and the originals and I can clearly see that YOU are the liar.1) in the original draw you may see clar that the 2nd hands are not birds wings they are exacly like the other hand and the hands are draw it completly diferent than the bird wings.2) the distance between the shoulder and arm that you draw are fake is to short for an arm in that simetry and perfecly match as Joseph draw it including with part of the fingers of # 1) and tha you say is a wing

  • Joe Smith FAIL

  • ..this is an important video ...this forgery of joseph smith was confirmed in 1967 even fiurther...see this you-tube video:THE LOST BOOK OF ABRAHAM (FULL VIDEO) on my favorites...

  • I've known Bill for more than 15 years. One thing is for sure, he's no liar. He knows his stuff VERY well. He's compassionate and caring and wants to reach the Mormons. He's a man of integrity.  If you don't like what he says, then refute him with facts, not accusations.

  • Poor mormons. =(

  • Another classic example of LDS tripping over their shoelaces, tripped up by a trivial issue called The Truth!! LDS Response?? Lie, Deny, Sidestep!! Then, proclaim their testamentbased upon the warm, fuzzy feelings in their hearts!!

  • It is not confirmed by warm fuzzy feelings but by scholarship- Anton Deimel's, Pantheon Babylonicum oder Keilschriftkatalog der Babylo. Gn. (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1950), 48.

    The Above work is Catholic and contains names similar to those given by Smith- Where he claims in the text that they should be found

    and if you don't know that Gods though identical in form and story are given various names in mythologies you are not a source of light or truth in this matter.

  • Source of light or truth, MesiahBeenLyin'??

    Perhaps now you might explain why you lied trough your teeth about your religious affilliations!!

    Clearly, you are not Jewish, as you claimed to be!!

  • GoLyin4JosephSmith;

    FAIRLDS???

    Flimmsey-Lindsay??

    You make me laugh, you Mobot fool!!

    Like Flimmsey-Lindsay or FAIRLDS are credible sources??

    Their "evidences" won't hold wet sand!!

    Just WHO has authenticated this crap that you call "evidence"?? Who has objectively reviewed it!!

  • Powerful!

  • This is not Wrong

    The Book of Abraham Is the most Jewish Book

    The "Errors" are not Errors.

    I am a Jew and my Rabbi showed me similar scenes and explained to me that Abraham my father was almost sacrificed as a youth to pagan Gods and that an Angel of the Lord did save him. I have found also that the Gods under him The Jars were worshiped by my Ishmaelite cousins worshiped them under names that are the same or similar to those that Joseph Smith Gave.

  • Messiah;

    Unfortunately, there is not ONE group of credible experts, Egyptologists, or anyone else who have studied the pappyris in an unbiased fashion, who are willing to support your position.

  • If you actual had ever handled any of the books of the dead or of breathings you would know that they do not even all agree as to the exact order or meaning of any of the pictures The Egyptians were not as stale and predictable as THE EXPERTS make them out to be. Also If no one challenges the Authority in the field and nobody forces them to show their work no progress is made and we would be stuck in dogma. How do you personally know that the Experts know what they are saying?

  • Also If you are defending as you have an anti-Mormon video and you style yourself an Outlaw the Mormon's likely excommunicated you or you left. If you left Judaism or Mainstream Christianity I don't think you would be trying to drown those faiths. My own research using the works of so called creditable Egyptologists on facsimile three (which these people's videos and most other anti group don't cover at all) you cannot get by the Egyptological soundness of Joseph Smith's interpretation.

  • Messofamessiah;

    Unfortunately, your suppositions about my handle "Outlaw" having any connection to LDS is wrong, and actually, it DOES have something to do with my renunciation of Christianity.

    Your perceptions of me are as muddled as your perceptions of the facsimilies that SmYth "translated".

    Go find ANY Non-LDS professor or Egyptol;ogist who will verify the credibility of your research, then we can discuss the

    "Egyptological soundness" SmYth's interpretations of the funeral text.

  • If you knew anything about the funeral texts of Egypt you would know they were not about death but about life. Joseph Smith's interpretation of the Was or Wosret staff (Facsimile 2 Fig 3) is "Egyptological soundness". Joseph Smith said it represented power and authority. Much the same as Sir Alan Henderson Gardiner (one of the premier British Egyptologists of the early and mid-Twentieth century) who labeled it dominion or lordship. Gardiner is not Lds, and if he is not credible no one is.WORD!!!

  • Messiahblind;

    You are wanting to convolute Sir Alan's observations, presenting them as if he endorsed the notion that he somehow endorsed or affirmed SmYth's claims about the BoA;

    He did not, and you know it. You are just another coniving Mobot liar.

    WORD??

  • WORD!!!

  • Messiabenlyin;

    I you were REALLY a jew, then the total implausibility of BoM would become glaringly apparent.

    First, Jews were not permitted to marry outside of their race.

    Second, the Jews were not permitted to build temples at their own discretion.

    Third, had The Lamanites truly been of Hebrew or Jewish dissent, then they would have gotten a helluva lot more that $25. when they sold Manhatten!!

  • Your argument presupposes too much

    First not all members of any group abide utterly and immovably by what they are supposed to. Israel worshiped the Golden Calf.

    Secondly we had a Temple in Elephantine in Egypt.

    Third you are a racist- Jews are not instinctively bankers

  • So. Messiahbeenwring;

    Regarding the Temple in in Elephantine, Egypt:

    Who is the "we" that you are referring to??

  • Israelites.

  • There is NO credible, objectively reviewed evidence to connect any such temple, or any other temple anywhere else in the world with any of the people who had anything to do with The Book of Mormon.

    This is where LDS seeks to "piggyback" their so-called "evidences"; they locate places and structures that clearly do wxist, then attempt to establish a nonexistant link to them.

    Clever?? Yes!! But NONE of these so-called "evidences" can be validated by nonpartisan, credible experts.

  • Judging from what I've seen on your profile page, it appears to me that you are a Mormon, MessiahbeenLevi!!

  • Comment removed

  • MessiakBeenLyin':

    Why did you lie

    ??

    You previously stated that you are a

    Jew; You are not a Jew, you are a Mormon.

    Sad, how Mobots have to deliberately, willfully, and wantonly lie in order to defend their cult!!

  • If one is a member of a faith does that change one's DNA or Family Tree?

  • Depemds upon who you ask, Messiahbeenlyin';

    Many Mobots argue that God "changed the DNA" of the so-called "Lamanites". The fact is that you are a Mormon. though you may have a jewish heratige, you initially presented yourself as a Jew, and did not disclose your faith as a Mormon.

    In the Mobot world, such selective application of the truth is acceptable; those not in your cult identify your acts as deception.

  • Now, Messiahbeenlyin';

    Since you deliberately engaged in your selective applications of 'truth", I have no reason to believe your story about a Rabbi verifying LDS's excuse for SmYth's bungling of his "translations".

    No credible NonLDS Egyptologists will support LDS's lame excuses for SmYths "translations".

  • So, it was "intermarraige", huh??... although, at that time, Jews were not supposed to marry outside of their faith.

    I never said that you were "born' a Mormon; I do see your claim that you made to being Jewish, along with your refusal to disclose your faith as a Mormon as being deceptive.

    Had I not checked your profile, and challenged you, you would not have disclosed it. Again, we see Mormon's justifications for their selective interpretations of the truth; to nonMormons, it's deception.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more