it was unfortunate they broke up. but it was for the better. their different tastes in music didn't work as a group. going solo was the only was to go.
I think Led Zeppelin must have learned from this point in the Beatles career. When John bonham and Jimmy page were both struggling with alcohol and drugs John Paul jones took the helm for in through the out door. There was nobody telling Jpj he couldn't do it, and I believe it was a successful album, a temporary departure from traditional Zeppelin. I believe if bonham hadn't passed then the band would have gotten their shit together and maintained the quality of their early stuff. If only the B
@x00xcarusox00x Yes they did, They would in the later 70s reguarly come over each others houses and watch tv. They even said they joked around about accepting saturday night live's offer to both come together and jam live.
@MunisAwesome Lennon, Starr and Harrison, but not Paul ! Paul was pretty much rejected by the other lads after the breakup. Maybe it was because he quit The Beatles first or pushed the others too hard prior to the breakup ?
@mrstevehartman No, You actually got it wrong. Ringo left for awhile in 1968 but came back, But it was John Lennon who left the band for good first. There was tension between all of them, But again, They did all make up. There are even videos of them in the anthology hanging out and jamming together.
@mrstevehartman No, You actually got it wrong. Ringo left for awhile in 1968 but came back, But it was John Lennon who left the band for good first. There was tension between all of them, But again, They did all make up. There are even videos of them in the anthology hanging out and jamming together.
@MunisAwesome WRONG-O ! Google " Beatles breakup " and read for yourself. Paul quit The Beatles first. And, I know Ringo walked out for a while as the bickering was getting to him. John, George and Ringo seemed to have a " loose " relationship after the split, at least for a while. I have never, NEVER, seen a picture or heard of a song where Paul and John appear to be buddies and working together as in the old days. I have seen a video of P,G and R playing together in the early 90s, though !
@mrstevehartman "In September, Abbey Rd is released and John officially announces to the rest of the Beatles that he is calling it quits" He just never publicly announced it, so I guess I have to say to you "WRONG-O" ANd you are going to have to read properly. Paul wasn't the first to leave officially, But publicly announce it. And Again, You don't need to be in a band together working on music to be friends again. Sorry if you didn't know that. be continued
@MunisAwesome John did nothing but " Waffle " on the issue of him quitting the group. One foot in and one foot out. I call that protection. WELL, maybe the Lads and I can work it out or maybe not. The Beatles world from 68 - 70 was a three ring circus and a morass of unfinished projects. None of them wanted to deal with it. They all, really, wanted out. Paul was still the first Beatle to PUBLICALLY say " I quit " and mean it. I call that official and not " heresay " !!
@mrstevehartman But he wasn't the first to officially leave, I'm not saying leaving makes John a total cunt. Even though he was a bad father to sean and even abandoned his first son and would constantly cheat on his first wife. But the reality is, John did leave first. Paul was just the only one to tell the public he left. I mean I can leeave and quit a band, And then a month later another member of the band quits but publicly anounces it. Does that mean he left the band first?
@MunisAwesome Ive read it both ways and it depends on what your reading and who wrote it. I believe it was something John said in a Rolling Stone interview in ( about ) Sept of 69 that he was quitting. But, did he really ? I dont think you can leave a band like The Beatles just like that. Theres a lot of legal issues and squables to resolve in a court of law. I mean, someone has to start the process on a legal document. So, are we talking " seperation " here, or a " legal divorce " ???
@MunisAwesome From Wikipedia. On Sept 20th 1969, John informed Klein and Macca of his intent to leave the band. Shortly after, however, ALL FOUR Beatles signed a renegotiated contract. This was the groups last demonstration of unity, though transient in nature. It was supposed to bind The Beatles until 76, both collectivly and seperately. April 70, PAUL QUITS. Early 71, PAUL SUES for total dissolution of the band. If John quit in Sept, 69, why did he sign a new contract and not sue like Paul ??
@mrstevehartman "The completion of the Abbey Road track "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" on 20 August 1969 was the last time all four Beatles were together in the same studio. Lennon announced his departure to the rest of the group on 20 September, but agreed that no public announcement would be made until various legal matters were resolved." Nope, YOu read wikipedia wrong. He announced his leave. Just never did it publicly. Don't twist things. And read all my comments.
@MunisAwesome Oh, please... my confused friend. If John quits in August, why did he sign a renegotiated contract to bind the band till 1976 ?? Why didnt John say " Im totally through with The Beatles and will persue legal action to dissolve the band " ?? PAUL, not John went public to make it official and started legal action to dissolve The Beatles legally. If John was serious, he should of done what Paul did. HE didnt ! As far as im concerned, his statement was half hearted. Pauls wasent...
@MunisAwesome NOW, where did your ass go ? John was burning the candle at both ends. If Yucko and the Plastic Ono Band didnt work out, then maybe John and the lads could give it one more try. He took the safe bet by not PUBLICALLY announceing his quitting The Beatles and takeing legal action to dissolve the band. Like I said before, one foot in and one foot out. However, i've even read an article that states that Ringo was the first to quit since he walked out for a week or so.........
@mrstevehartman Clearly you're a hardcore John Lennon fan and this is in fact putting you in denial. You can try get around it as much as you can. But from what I read from the sites, There is no getting around the John was the first officially to leave. Ringo left for a while then came back, This has happened MANY times during 1962-1968. But the one to officially leave is John Lennon, I'm not saying it's a bad thing or he's not talented.
@mrstevehartman And they went to court to get rid of contracts they had between the band members. Also John even said in interviews after the beatles that he after awhile even wanted to leave before his own official leave because he liked to get onto new things.
@MunisAwesome I suppose... that one could even argue that all four had quit by late 69 as they werent in the studio anymore. Basically, the studio atmosphere had become " Tense " between all of them. I like the lads equally, but tend to lean more towad Pauls style of writing cause its more whimsical and lighthearted. All im really saying is that it was PAUL who went very public and sued to legally dissolve The Beatles. What really went on may be lost to time and history.....
@mrstevehartman Well we are debating on who officially left the band , Which was John Lennon. You can try come up with as many excuses as you want like BUT HE DIDN'T PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE IT, HE JUSTLEFT FOREVER. But the reality is, Hewas the first to officially leave and never come back. Paul in my opinion was a better lyricist then Lennon, Lennon even admitted that he was often mistaken as the writer of songs Paul wrote.
@MunisAwesome Its a judgement call, you say John and I say Paul. So, on to the next question : Who was the real leader of The Beatles, Paul or John ? In the early days, I think P & Js writing skills and subjects were interchangeable. Kinda the " Hold Your Hand, I Feel Fine " cute, cuddly, mop top thing. Later on they really started drifting apart musically and I remember John calling " O Bla De " Pauls granny shit ! John for sure, takes the cake as far as scathing remarks toward Paul...
@mrstevehartman Well I use to be in a band, And I was the first to leave it... But I didn't publicly announce it in the media. Does that mean I never really left it? And Paul and John were both equal, They both wrote simple songs as well as complex songs. And for Obla Di Obla Da, I hope John didn't call it granny shit. Because Obla Di Obla Da actually means something. Which you should look up. Paul wrote most of the songs on Sgt. peppers and other songs like For No One, I'm Looking through You.
@MunisAwesome FINE, but you were not a Beatle. Its the magnitude of the group that makes the difference. Yes, John did call " O Bla Di " Pauls granny shit. It was obviously too light hearted for him and didnt fit in with his serious attitude. I find the song just simply about life, love and family. Maybe thats why John didnt like it. After the split, John went on to sing " How Do You Sleep ( Ya Cunt ) " totally directed at Paul. John could really be nasty and Yucko furthured things along.
@mrstevehartman It'sreally depends on what kind of songs you like, Technically they were pretty much equal. But I personally think it was Paul, I mean John has wrote great songs in the Beatles but sadly a lot of the great songs Paul has wrote have been forgotten or mistaken for John's songs when they are actually Paul's.
@MunisAwesome I've even seen interviews where John " Poo Pood " The Beatles as silly rubbish. Its like, I've grown up since then and who needs it anyway ? Later on, in the latter 70s, Paul wrote " Silly Love Songs " cause John said to Paul.. " You see Paul, all you want to do is write silly love songs ". Im sorry for the rift between them. But, I really hold John mainly responsable for that. John cut off his nose, to spite his face...
@mrstevehartman LOL no, The Silly Love Songs were a response to the Critics who criticized him for writing a lot of love songs. You really need to get your facts right.
@MunisAwesome Im not saying there werent other critics, just that John was the biggest. And I really did read or see that somewhere, though its been a while. Its really interesting to listen to the old video interviews of the Lads. One never knows what one may pick up !
@mrstevehartman John Lennon said Paul died creatively, The song had nothing to do with John's comment and was years apart from the comment. It had soething to do with the critics who teased Paul for writing so many love songs. Sorry but you seriously need to stop, Nearly all the information you've brought up have been twisted. And also Paul has wrote bad music (So has John), But Paul has still had MANY great albums during his solo career. Be continued.
@mrstevehartman John in the early 70s had a kind of resentment towards Paul, Whether it'd be because he was threatened musically by Paul's talent or for several other reasons like the feud they had in the last days of the beatles which he and paul dragged for a few years longer.
@MunisAwesome How do you know my info is twisted ? I told you I read about Johns remark to Paul about only writing " Silly love songs ". Just cause you havent seen nor read it, does that make me a liar ?? And its NO DUH that John held a resentment towards Paul, actually beginning after Eppie died. Paul took the reins of the group and kept them moving forward. Im sure John resented it and continued to through the 70s. Its too bad that John was such a sarcastic cuss, but he was !
@mrstevehartman Okay, I don't think you know what twisted means. I'm pretty much saying you're getting actual information then twisting it to your liking. It's either your twisting it or getting it wrong. Again, Silly Love Songs WAS NOT a direct hit on both John and the critics, But only only the critics. And John only kept criticizing Paul is because he probably felt a little threatened. I also never called you a liar, You brang that up yourself.
@MunisAwesome Here in America, twisted means screwed up mentally. That versus twisting which means skewing the truth. Well, im neither and im just commenting on what ive read or heard. You say it was just a hit on the critics, well John was a critic of Pauls too and probably the biggest. You just seem to want to make John out as a babe in the woods with no gile toward Paul. Im just telling you what ive seen and read. It could even be that the authors lied or were " twisting " the truth ??
@mrstevehartman Oh no, They've had songs attacking each other. Even when Paul had stopped Lennon still dragged it longer. The song How Do you Sleep was even directed at Paul, But that does NOT mean Silly Love songs was a direct hit on John. I'm sorry but you need to stop, But then again according to you. It wouldn't even be a hit at anyone since He just wrote the song and didn't publicly announce it was a response.
@MunisAwesome Yes, I know that. It was sort of a fued between them with John leading the way. " How Do You Sleep ", was a very direct barb at Paul and REALLY insulting. Paul did write some songs that could be interpited as knocking John and or the Lads, but John takes the cake. AGAIN, reguarding Silly Love Songs, what really goes on behind closed doors ?? Im just telling you what I read once. Take it anyway you want to !
@MunisAwesome Yes, I know that. It was sort of a fued between them with John leading the way. " How Do You Sleep ", was a very direct barb at Paul and REALLY insulting. Paul did write some songs that could be interpited as knocking John and or the Lads, but John takes the cake. AGAIN, reguarding Silly Love Songs, what really goes on behind closed doors ?? Im just telling you what I read once, so take it anyway you want to !
@MunisAwesome You ducking out on that one, or what ? If The Beatles are ONLY one of the greatest, Whoes the greatest ? Pink Floyd, The Stones, Led Zepplin or maybe ABBA to you ? NO, it must be Lady Ga Ga !!
@mrstevehartman LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL You fail. I'm not ducking out on anything... I just don't think they're the only GREATEST band out there. I mean guitar wise, I think Jimi Hendrix is the greatest guitarist. I think as a band studio wise it was The Beatles. I think the greatest live band was Led Zeppelin or the greatest vocalist which is Freddie Mercury. So stop being an idiot.
@MunisAwesome WELL, thats spreading it around and covering your dweeby ass ! UGH.... maybe this or maybe that. I said the GREATEST band not bands or individual artists ! Make up your, AAAAHHHHH.... MIND ??
@mrstevehartman Led Zeppelin were epic, They not only owned the studio recordings but also live. They were godly when it came to improvising live. Robert Plant's vocals were unique and powerful, Bonham's drumming is objectively the best, Jimmy Page is one of the greatest guitarists, And John Paul Jones is the most underrated bass guitarist.
@mrstevehartman Clearly you don't know shit, Led Zeppelin never crashed and burned. Their drummer died and announced that Led Zeppelin isn't the same without Bonzo.
@MunisAwesome I like Zep, but their not even close to The Beatles nor Floyd. Floyds " Dark Side Of The Moon " concept album, was virtually as good as " Pepper ". BUT... to each his own. So dont say I dont know shite, its just a personal call....
@mrstevehartman Well clearly you don't know shit if you can claim that Zeppelin crashed and burned when they never did and like I explained before that they never crashed only broke up due to the death of their drummer.
@mrstevehartman LOLOLOLOLOL oh wait you're serious... You do know who their drummer was right? And Robert Plant even said that Led Zeppelin wouldn't be Led Zeppelin without Bonzo. Their improvisation relied heavily on their musical understanding of each other. And it's like The Who, THey got a new drummer. But it'd never be the same. That's why Robert's sooooo reluctant to have a reunion, there has barely been any reuinion except for O2 and LA.
@MunisAwesome No, I really wasent serious. However, there are bands that have done replacements on departed members to be as good or better than before.
@mrstevehartman I mean you haven't seen any film recording of Matt Damon and Ben Affleck just hanging out? That's because that isn't what you do when you hang out. And Paul and Lennon have talked about hanging around together in interviews. Paul even said that before lennon died they would joke around about SNL's offer to come on.
@Lovemyselfidoes81 You are right, But that's because both George and Ringo didn't get much songs in the albums even when they wanted to. So they were both in similar situations.
@MunisAwesome Yup and there is no Doubt that Ringo's Closest Friend in the Beatles was George and George's Closest Friend in The Beatles was Ringo right from when Ringo joined the Band in 1962 right up untill George's death in 2001 and even Post George's death i don't think Ringo could ever be as close to Paul as he was George..agree with everything i just said??
@Lovemyselfidoes81 The Lennon/McCartney domination of the Beatles was beneficial for the band up to this point. However, with John's input and songwriting limited by heroin & Yoko, the band should have let George's role expand. Harrison had a lot of fine songs by this time which could have made Let It Be a much stronger LP when eventually released. George's Isn't It A Pity and All Things Must Pass were superior to any of John's LIB tracks & should have been properly recorded/released.
i dont mind, ill play, yknow, whatever you want me to play, or i wont play at all if you dont want me to play, yknow whatever it is that would please you, ill do it
@PhillyDippy5 - actually... by this stage john and paul were NOT friends and were having arguments far worse that this one with george. the tensions toward the end were pretty awful and they completely unraveled.
@PhillyDippy5 - i wasn't trying to offend you... i'm a HUGE fan of the beatles since i saw them on ed sullivan in 64... i've been to abbey road studios, 3 saville row and many other beatles destinations... but "to me" and from what i've seen and read... they were not at all like brothers in the end. i do think that long after the beatles, things healed and they became friends again... but at this time, to me they were not at all like brothers.
@jlr022159 Not as much as people think, they still managed an incredibly creative collaborative effort and recorded Abbey Road in the months following the Let It Be sessions, and by all accounts got along ok with a great atmoshpere in the studio and clearly a stunning result on record. It seems more to have been a case of cabin fever - being stuck in close work and play with the same people for ten years straight would probably do it to most people
@hylareca best friends do argue though. but i do agree it's sad to see them argue :( but things were patched up way before george died. Things were patched up before John had died as well.
GEORGE CLEARLY FEED UP WITH BEING SHOVED TO THE BACK OF THE BUS BY PAUL ! ( AND JOHN )
HEARTHEANGELSVOICES 1 week ago
111307 views 0 disslikes
DJ4e6yPek 1 month ago
Lol Ringo at the end.xD
BeatlesFanGirl11 3 months ago
it was unfortunate they broke up. but it was for the better. their different tastes in music didn't work as a group. going solo was the only was to go.
BerkeleyBuilt 3 months ago 4
This wasnt a arguement as they always say
vitorbastos123 3 months ago
george is tring so hard to b e as aggreable as possible <3 love himmm! i dont really think it was a ligit arguement tho
Paulmaclover1234 4 months ago
"I wont play at all if you dont want me to play, whatever pleases you" Thats total irony right there dude, on Georges part. LOL
TheAmericanOriginal 3 months ago 2
George and Paul: ARGUE ARGUE ARGUE.
Me: *Walks into Abbey Road Studios* "Guys, I love you, but shut up."
The Beatles: ._.
Me: :D
XsbcatfangX 4 months ago 3
*eatles had let george's songwriting flourish.
pyurmassacur 4 months ago
I think Led Zeppelin must have learned from this point in the Beatles career. When John bonham and Jimmy page were both struggling with alcohol and drugs John Paul jones took the helm for in through the out door. There was nobody telling Jpj he couldn't do it, and I believe it was a successful album, a temporary departure from traditional Zeppelin. I believe if bonham hadn't passed then the band would have gotten their shit together and maintained the quality of their early stuff. If only the B
pyurmassacur 4 months ago
I just love Ringo in this part. He's like "ffffffuuuu-"
allyandlarry 5 months ago
Poor George, he was a great musician, but the two best musicians ever were in his band too... But he was like a brother for Paul
SirBarzdevics 6 months ago
It's a shame the beatle broke up the way they did and what happened in the early seventies. Thankfully they did eventually all make up.
MunisAwesome 6 months ago
@MunisAwesome not paul and lennon.
x00xcarusox00x 6 months ago
@x00xcarusox00x Yes they did, They would in the later 70s reguarly come over each others houses and watch tv. They even said they joked around about accepting saturday night live's offer to both come together and jam live.
MunisAwesome 6 months ago
@MunisAwesome Lennon, Starr and Harrison, but not Paul ! Paul was pretty much rejected by the other lads after the breakup. Maybe it was because he quit The Beatles first or pushed the others too hard prior to the breakup ?
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman No, You actually got it wrong. Ringo left for awhile in 1968 but came back, But it was John Lennon who left the band for good first. There was tension between all of them, But again, They did all make up. There are even videos of them in the anthology hanging out and jamming together.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman No, You actually got it wrong. Ringo left for awhile in 1968 but came back, But it was John Lennon who left the band for good first. There was tension between all of them, But again, They did all make up. There are even videos of them in the anthology hanging out and jamming together.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome WRONG-O ! Google " Beatles breakup " and read for yourself. Paul quit The Beatles first. And, I know Ringo walked out for a while as the bickering was getting to him. John, George and Ringo seemed to have a " loose " relationship after the split, at least for a while. I have never, NEVER, seen a picture or heard of a song where Paul and John appear to be buddies and working together as in the old days. I have seen a video of P,G and R playing together in the early 90s, though !
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman "In September, Abbey Rd is released and John officially announces to the rest of the Beatles that he is calling it quits" He just never publicly announced it, so I guess I have to say to you "WRONG-O" ANd you are going to have to read properly. Paul wasn't the first to leave officially, But publicly announce it. And Again, You don't need to be in a band together working on music to be friends again. Sorry if you didn't know that. be continued
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome John did nothing but " Waffle " on the issue of him quitting the group. One foot in and one foot out. I call that protection. WELL, maybe the Lads and I can work it out or maybe not. The Beatles world from 68 - 70 was a three ring circus and a morass of unfinished projects. None of them wanted to deal with it. They all, really, wanted out. Paul was still the first Beatle to PUBLICALLY say " I quit " and mean it. I call that official and not " heresay " !!
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman But he wasn't the first to officially leave, I'm not saying leaving makes John a total cunt. Even though he was a bad father to sean and even abandoned his first son and would constantly cheat on his first wife. But the reality is, John did leave first. Paul was just the only one to tell the public he left. I mean I can leeave and quit a band, And then a month later another member of the band quits but publicly anounces it. Does that mean he left the band first?
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Ive read it both ways and it depends on what your reading and who wrote it. I believe it was something John said in a Rolling Stone interview in ( about ) Sept of 69 that he was quitting. But, did he really ? I dont think you can leave a band like The Beatles just like that. Theres a lot of legal issues and squables to resolve in a court of law. I mean, someone has to start the process on a legal document. So, are we talking " seperation " here, or a " legal divorce " ???
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome From Wikipedia. On Sept 20th 1969, John informed Klein and Macca of his intent to leave the band. Shortly after, however, ALL FOUR Beatles signed a renegotiated contract. This was the groups last demonstration of unity, though transient in nature. It was supposed to bind The Beatles until 76, both collectivly and seperately. April 70, PAUL QUITS. Early 71, PAUL SUES for total dissolution of the band. If John quit in Sept, 69, why did he sign a new contract and not sue like Paul ??
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman "The completion of the Abbey Road track "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" on 20 August 1969 was the last time all four Beatles were together in the same studio. Lennon announced his departure to the rest of the group on 20 September, but agreed that no public announcement would be made until various legal matters were resolved." Nope, YOu read wikipedia wrong. He announced his leave. Just never did it publicly. Don't twist things. And read all my comments.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Oh, please... my confused friend. If John quits in August, why did he sign a renegotiated contract to bind the band till 1976 ?? Why didnt John say " Im totally through with The Beatles and will persue legal action to dissolve the band " ?? PAUL, not John went public to make it official and started legal action to dissolve The Beatles legally. If John was serious, he should of done what Paul did. HE didnt ! As far as im concerned, his statement was half hearted. Pauls wasent...
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
Comment removed
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
Comment removed
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome NOW, where did your ass go ? John was burning the candle at both ends. If Yucko and the Plastic Ono Band didnt work out, then maybe John and the lads could give it one more try. He took the safe bet by not PUBLICALLY announceing his quitting The Beatles and takeing legal action to dissolve the band. Like I said before, one foot in and one foot out. However, i've even read an article that states that Ringo was the first to quit since he walked out for a week or so.........
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Clearly you're a hardcore John Lennon fan and this is in fact putting you in denial. You can try get around it as much as you can. But from what I read from the sites, There is no getting around the John was the first officially to leave. Ringo left for a while then came back, This has happened MANY times during 1962-1968. But the one to officially leave is John Lennon, I'm not saying it's a bad thing or he's not talented.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman And they went to court to get rid of contracts they had between the band members. Also John even said in interviews after the beatles that he after awhile even wanted to leave before his own official leave because he liked to get onto new things.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome I suppose... that one could even argue that all four had quit by late 69 as they werent in the studio anymore. Basically, the studio atmosphere had become " Tense " between all of them. I like the lads equally, but tend to lean more towad Pauls style of writing cause its more whimsical and lighthearted. All im really saying is that it was PAUL who went very public and sued to legally dissolve The Beatles. What really went on may be lost to time and history.....
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Well we are debating on who officially left the band , Which was John Lennon. You can try come up with as many excuses as you want like BUT HE DIDN'T PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE IT, HE JUSTLEFT FOREVER. But the reality is, Hewas the first to officially leave and never come back. Paul in my opinion was a better lyricist then Lennon, Lennon even admitted that he was often mistaken as the writer of songs Paul wrote.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Its a judgement call, you say John and I say Paul. So, on to the next question : Who was the real leader of The Beatles, Paul or John ? In the early days, I think P & Js writing skills and subjects were interchangeable. Kinda the " Hold Your Hand, I Feel Fine " cute, cuddly, mop top thing. Later on they really started drifting apart musically and I remember John calling " O Bla De " Pauls granny shit ! John for sure, takes the cake as far as scathing remarks toward Paul...
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Well I use to be in a band, And I was the first to leave it... But I didn't publicly announce it in the media. Does that mean I never really left it? And Paul and John were both equal, They both wrote simple songs as well as complex songs. And for Obla Di Obla Da, I hope John didn't call it granny shit. Because Obla Di Obla Da actually means something. Which you should look up. Paul wrote most of the songs on Sgt. peppers and other songs like For No One, I'm Looking through You.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome FINE, but you were not a Beatle. Its the magnitude of the group that makes the difference. Yes, John did call " O Bla Di " Pauls granny shit. It was obviously too light hearted for him and didnt fit in with his serious attitude. I find the song just simply about life, love and family. Maybe thats why John didnt like it. After the split, John went on to sing " How Do You Sleep ( Ya Cunt ) " totally directed at Paul. John could really be nasty and Yucko furthured things along.
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman It'sreally depends on what kind of songs you like, Technically they were pretty much equal. But I personally think it was Paul, I mean John has wrote great songs in the Beatles but sadly a lot of the great songs Paul has wrote have been forgotten or mistaken for John's songs when they are actually Paul's.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome I've even seen interviews where John " Poo Pood " The Beatles as silly rubbish. Its like, I've grown up since then and who needs it anyway ? Later on, in the latter 70s, Paul wrote " Silly Love Songs " cause John said to Paul.. " You see Paul, all you want to do is write silly love songs ". Im sorry for the rift between them. But, I really hold John mainly responsable for that. John cut off his nose, to spite his face...
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman LOL no, The Silly Love Songs were a response to the Critics who criticized him for writing a lot of love songs. You really need to get your facts right.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Im not saying there werent other critics, just that John was the biggest. And I really did read or see that somewhere, though its been a while. Its really interesting to listen to the old video interviews of the Lads. One never knows what one may pick up !
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman John Lennon said Paul died creatively, The song had nothing to do with John's comment and was years apart from the comment. It had soething to do with the critics who teased Paul for writing so many love songs. Sorry but you seriously need to stop, Nearly all the information you've brought up have been twisted. And also Paul has wrote bad music (So has John), But Paul has still had MANY great albums during his solo career. Be continued.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman John in the early 70s had a kind of resentment towards Paul, Whether it'd be because he was threatened musically by Paul's talent or for several other reasons like the feud they had in the last days of the beatles which he and paul dragged for a few years longer.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome How do you know my info is twisted ? I told you I read about Johns remark to Paul about only writing " Silly love songs ". Just cause you havent seen nor read it, does that make me a liar ?? And its NO DUH that John held a resentment towards Paul, actually beginning after Eppie died. Paul took the reins of the group and kept them moving forward. Im sure John resented it and continued to through the 70s. Its too bad that John was such a sarcastic cuss, but he was !
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Okay, I don't think you know what twisted means. I'm pretty much saying you're getting actual information then twisting it to your liking. It's either your twisting it or getting it wrong. Again, Silly Love Songs WAS NOT a direct hit on both John and the critics, But only only the critics. And John only kept criticizing Paul is because he probably felt a little threatened. I also never called you a liar, You brang that up yourself.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Here in America, twisted means screwed up mentally. That versus twisting which means skewing the truth. Well, im neither and im just commenting on what ive read or heard. You say it was just a hit on the critics, well John was a critic of Pauls too and probably the biggest. You just seem to want to make John out as a babe in the woods with no gile toward Paul. Im just telling you what ive seen and read. It could even be that the authors lied or were " twisting " the truth ??
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Oh no, They've had songs attacking each other. Even when Paul had stopped Lennon still dragged it longer. The song How Do you Sleep was even directed at Paul, But that does NOT mean Silly Love songs was a direct hit on John. I'm sorry but you need to stop, But then again according to you. It wouldn't even be a hit at anyone since He just wrote the song and didn't publicly announce it was a response.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Yes, I know that. It was sort of a fued between them with John leading the way. " How Do You Sleep ", was a very direct barb at Paul and REALLY insulting. Paul did write some songs that could be interpited as knocking John and or the Lads, but John takes the cake. AGAIN, reguarding Silly Love Songs, what really goes on behind closed doors ?? Im just telling you what I read once. Take it anyway you want to !
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MunisAwesome Yes, I know that. It was sort of a fued between them with John leading the way. " How Do You Sleep ", was a very direct barb at Paul and REALLY insulting. Paul did write some songs that could be interpited as knocking John and or the Lads, but John takes the cake. AGAIN, reguarding Silly Love Songs, what really goes on behind closed doors ?? Im just telling you what I read once, so take it anyway you want to !
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome AGAIN, I SAY.. where did your DWEEB- ASS GO ??
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman LOLOLOL Nice rebuttal. Where did your decent replies/comebacks go? Oh wait you never really had any.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome The Beatles are the greatest rock band of all time. Can we agree on THAT ???
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman One of the greatest.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome The sun will rise in the East and set in the West tomorrow. How about that ????
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome You ducking out on that one, or what ? If The Beatles are ONLY one of the greatest, Whoes the greatest ? Pink Floyd, The Stones, Led Zepplin or maybe ABBA to you ? NO, it must be Lady Ga Ga !!
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL You fail. I'm not ducking out on anything... I just don't think they're the only GREATEST band out there. I mean guitar wise, I think Jimi Hendrix is the greatest guitarist. I think as a band studio wise it was The Beatles. I think the greatest live band was Led Zeppelin or the greatest vocalist which is Freddie Mercury. So stop being an idiot.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome WELL, thats spreading it around and covering your dweeby ass ! UGH.... maybe this or maybe that. I said the GREATEST band not bands or individual artists ! Make up your, AAAAHHHHH.... MIND ??
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman It's as if I'm talking to an idiot or redneck. And also I think Led Zeppelin are equally as good as The Beatles.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Perhaps Pink Floyd, but certainly not Zep...
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Led Zeppelin were epic, They not only owned the studio recordings but also live. They were godly when it came to improvising live. Robert Plant's vocals were unique and powerful, Bonham's drumming is objectively the best, Jimmy Page is one of the greatest guitarists, And John Paul Jones is the most underrated bass guitarist.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Pink Floyd is a close second to The Beatles. Zepplin crashed and burned years ago !!
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Clearly you don't know shit, Led Zeppelin never crashed and burned. Their drummer died and announced that Led Zeppelin isn't the same without Bonzo.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome I like Zep, but their not even close to The Beatles nor Floyd. Floyds " Dark Side Of The Moon " concept album, was virtually as good as " Pepper ". BUT... to each his own. So dont say I dont know shite, its just a personal call....
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman Well clearly you don't know shit if you can claim that Zeppelin crashed and burned when they never did and like I explained before that they never crashed only broke up due to the death of their drummer.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome All they had to do was find another drummer then, right ? After all, look what it did for The Beatles...
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman LOLOLOLOLOL oh wait you're serious... You do know who their drummer was right? And Robert Plant even said that Led Zeppelin wouldn't be Led Zeppelin without Bonzo. Their improvisation relied heavily on their musical understanding of each other. And it's like The Who, THey got a new drummer. But it'd never be the same. That's why Robert's sooooo reluctant to have a reunion, there has barely been any reuinion except for O2 and LA.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome No, I really wasent serious. However, there are bands that have done replacements on departed members to be as good or better than before.
mrstevehartman 5 months ago
@mrstevehartman I mean you haven't seen any film recording of Matt Damon and Ben Affleck just hanging out? That's because that isn't what you do when you hang out. And Paul and Lennon have talked about hanging around together in interviews. Paul even said that before lennon died they would joke around about SNL's offer to come on.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome there was no tension between George and Ringo
Lovemyselfidoes81 5 months ago
@Lovemyselfidoes81 You are right, But that's because both George and Ringo didn't get much songs in the albums even when they wanted to. So they were both in similar situations.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Yup and there is no Doubt that Ringo's Closest Friend in the Beatles was George and George's Closest Friend in The Beatles was Ringo right from when Ringo joined the Band in 1962 right up untill George's death in 2001 and even Post George's death i don't think Ringo could ever be as close to Paul as he was George..agree with everything i just said??
Lovemyselfidoes81 5 months ago
@MunisAwesome Pretty Much everything in The Beatles was Lennon/McCartney Dominated
Lovemyselfidoes81 5 months ago
@Lovemyselfidoes81 Obviously.
MunisAwesome 5 months ago
@Lovemyselfidoes81 The Lennon/McCartney domination of the Beatles was beneficial for the band up to this point. However, with John's input and songwriting limited by heroin & Yoko, the band should have let George's role expand. Harrison had a lot of fine songs by this time which could have made Let It Be a much stronger LP when eventually released. George's Isn't It A Pity and All Things Must Pass were superior to any of John's LIB tracks & should have been properly recorded/released.
redletter2008 4 months ago
they loved eachother like brothers, they were best friends, brothers and best friends fight, its not healthy if they dont, its unnatural hahaha
BellaCeLeNdAnO 7 months ago 15
LMAO ahh words cant describe what i feel for these boys <333
BellaCeLeNdAnO 7 months ago 4
ringos like shut up lets do this
mastergamer981 7 months ago 16
One in England we speak English not British !!
MsSamian 7 months ago
:(
kimblesxoxo 7 months ago
Damn, this is sad.
Ricetrife 8 months ago
Awkward... :/ hahaha cracked
Guerrillablackdog 8 months ago
i dont mind, ill play, yknow, whatever you want me to play, or i wont play at all if you dont want me to play, yknow whatever it is that would please you, ill do it
leahcharlottte 8 months ago 29
@leahcharlottte It's fantastic.
Khultan 5 months ago
haha so pretty much every comment here came from cracked. how the fuck do they even find these videos?
mmmpockyy 8 months ago
@mmmpockyy - this scene came directly from the movie/documentary "Let It Be"
jlr022159 7 months ago
awww poor guys
They were the best friends in the group; it's weird to see them argue. :(
hylareca 8 months ago 6
@hylareca The best friends were John and Paul actually.
PhillyDippy5 7 months ago
@PhillyDippy5 - actually... by this stage john and paul were NOT friends and were having arguments far worse that this one with george. the tensions toward the end were pretty awful and they completely unraveled.
jlr022159 7 months ago
@jlr022159 just like brothers
PhillyDippy5 7 months ago
@PhillyDippy5 - i wasn't trying to offend you... i'm a HUGE fan of the beatles since i saw them on ed sullivan in 64... i've been to abbey road studios, 3 saville row and many other beatles destinations... but "to me" and from what i've seen and read... they were not at all like brothers in the end. i do think that long after the beatles, things healed and they became friends again... but at this time, to me they were not at all like brothers.
jlr022159 7 months ago
@jlr022159 brothers fight
PhillyDippy5 7 months ago
@jlr022159 Not as much as people think, they still managed an incredibly creative collaborative effort and recorded Abbey Road in the months following the Let It Be sessions, and by all accounts got along ok with a great atmoshpere in the studio and clearly a stunning result on record. It seems more to have been a case of cabin fever - being stuck in close work and play with the same people for ten years straight would probably do it to most people
matcost92 6 months ago
@hylareca best friends do argue though. but i do agree it's sad to see them argue :( but things were patched up way before george died. Things were patched up before John had died as well.
rissygirly22 7 months ago
something, something, I'll play, something, something.
i dont speak 60's british.
sculp20 8 months ago 2
@sculp20 *English
thebigbopperable 8 months ago 8
Were those words?
LukeAlto2007 8 months ago 2
@LukeAlto2007 he basically said "i'll play if you want me to play or i wont play if you dont want me to play"
foreverWHOfan 8 months ago
bunch of weiners
Utubepooperful 8 months ago
Hi Cracked.
spackhollogay 8 months ago
CRACKED
jaaan17 8 months ago 44