Panorama - Wi-fi a warning signal part 2

[2011so5]

@sdarvell I apologize for telling you about the wifi experiment. The Blood Brain Barrier protects our brain from ammonia in our blood. The electric charge in the ammonia ion is the only thing that keeps it from crossing the BBB. The electromagnetic microwave briefly disrupts the charge. This is why people have insomnia, headaches, depression, and anxiety. These stresses are just the beginning building block for much more serious illness.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell we are not made equally and our biological thresholds are different. The embryo is effected first, then children, next would be women, then the sick or the elderly, and lastly young healthy men. We are not pieces of metal. Have you tried my experiment yet? Place your wifi within three feet of your head when you sleep. If it's so safe then you shouldn't have any problems like ears ringing, headaches, or insomnia. Just to name a few.

[2011so5]

It doesn't take much common sense to understand that if wifi and microwave ovens operate on the same frequency, 2.4 ghz, there could be a problem. This is why people are having problems. Then there are the sdarvell type-idiot pompass,that wait for a study to be published in a journal before they can agree with themselves. You can show them study after study and they still won't understand the relationship.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 yeah, people like me require conclusive proof. Go figure.

[2011so5]

To all people other than sdarvell. If you would like to see the recent discoveries of studies done by the U.S. military, Russia, Germany years ago regarding these signals, please go to the magdahavas site and click on the Zory Glacer button. There is a wealth of new information on the subject of this video.

[flinchus]

"My head feels hot burning my face is burning" That's because you're sleeping in an room wrapped in tin foil. LOL almost as funny as those campaigning against phone masts but also own a mobile phone.

[2011so5]

@flinchus Alluminum foil stops the signal. Try wrapping your cell phone and then call it. Radiation digital pulses are not good for you. Don't worry, the way everything is being radiated lately, you will soon have these symptoms. They first start by waking up at the same time every night.

[flinchus]

@2011so5

a. My point still stands.

b. I know what foil does.

c. If I get cancer it will most likely be from smoking cigarettes as opposed to using a wi-fi connection.

d.Almost every clinical blind trial testing people claiming EHS or MCS has concluded that participants reacted in equal measure to placebos as they did to the things that they assert cause their symptons. The only reason the government is trying to appear cautious is so that they may cover their backsides if the unlikely is true.

[2011so5]

@flinchus PLEASE go to the magdahavas site and click on the Dr. Zory Glacer Ph.D. archives. Find the #1 pick of the week titled "More than 2000 Documents prior to 1972 on Bioeffects of Radio Frequency Radiation" or "Pick of the Week #16: Russian Translation Microwave Radiation influence on Man and Animals (1970)" "Pick of the Week #12: Why Pulsed Microwave Frequencies are More Harmful." also "Pick of the Week #18: Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System 1965 – German translation"

[sdarvell]

Silver foil covering the inside of her house! clearly a crackpot! I bet she thinks that tin foil hats protect her from CIA satellites too!

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Alluminum foil will block the signal! Why call someone a crackpot due to being sensitive to this type of radiation?

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 Because they are. Did you watch the video? She can't even tell when the wifi signal effects her. She's just a tin-hat wearing crackpot who gets off on the sympathy she gets when she says something makes her sick.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Here we go again, I went to bed at 12:30 a.m. and just woke up with my ears ringing and heart beating pretty good. This has happened to me ever since they put a smart meter on the side of my house. I have spent quite a few days and hours trying to figure out why. Watch my favorites, you will see doctors and scientists explaining why this is happening. This lady is for real you can't make this stuff up. Just wait till you get a smart meter, then keep your cell and wifi on.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 Wifi won't wake you up. In order to create a causal link between the smart meter and your waking up, you need to determine how wifi signal can wake a person up and cause ringing in someones ears. Until that link is established its not real. Your imagining things. RE waking up at the same time every night, that's got more to do with how your body responds to sleep, than it does to wifi. Your body sleeps and wakes in patterns. That has nothing to do with wifi.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell I never thought myself and some of my neighbors would ever wake up due to rf radiation pulses carrying data packets. I guess the papers from Dr. Zory Glaser Ph.D.,LT,MSC,USNR retired U.S. Navy Researcher, NIOSH Manager, Executive Secretary Advisor to the U.S. FDA are all bad studies? You can find them in pdf files at the magdahavas site. Also, Dr. George Carlo Ph.D., the guy the cell phone industry was paid $28 million to do research on the matter. He's wrong too? But your right?

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 I think what you need to do is research the definition of the scientific method. One study does not conclusively prove anything. A few years ago some Russian scientists released academic papers on how they breached the speed of light. Doesn't meant they did it, or that its possible. The scientific method determined that their claims were false. Unless the cohort of relevant scientists agree with the findings of a study, and can replicate its results, it remains irrelevant.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell In the U.S., the thermal effects are generally believed to be the only ones of significance; other contentions are usually dismissed as lacking a provable basis. In the USSR, non-thermal effects are considered the most significant and are overwhelmingly the ones most studied. Dr. George Carlo Ph.D. is a U.S. scientist, was given $28 million to do the study and has come up with the same results. Dr. Henry Lai also came up with the same results as Carlo.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 You really don't understand the concept do you. I don't suppose you have the necessary understanding you interpret scientific papers. You should probably leave the whole determining if wifi is dangerous thing to your local GP. You are not particularly capable of handling it yourself.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Yes, I do understand the concept very much and you would too if you took the time to research the information given. I bring something more than "your wrong" "your a kook" "your unqualified" . I bring a ton to the table and you have brought nothing but insults.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 The concept i was referring to is quite clearly the scientific method. Your not capable of understanding the nature of academia in order to judge correct or incorrect knowledge. This is first required before reading academic papers. Without this fundamental knowledge you can not make accurate assumptions about that information. Your doctor has this understanding. Leave it to him to do for you.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell It looks to me that you think more highly of yourself than actual reality shows. I find that a personal experience is much more invigorating than just discussing a hearsay.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 I said nothing of myself in that response. I don't know where your getting that impression. The fact that you think that personal experience has more value than anything indicates why you don't currently have the skills necessary to interpret these papers. Anecdotal evidence is one of the most inefficient and ineffective methods of obtaining data. Understanding why that's the case is also an essential part interpreting these papers. Seriously leave it to your doctor.

[2011so5]

\@sdarvell Since there is more information on this health hazard than YouTube will allow me to post, I would suggest going to the magdahavas site and click on the Dr. Zory Glacer Archive button and look for Pick of the Week #18: Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System 1965 – German translation

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 Just because some kook puts something on the internet, that doesn't make it an indication that what he wrote is correct. Anyone can get a PhD, that doesn't make their word gospel. They need to take their ideas through the rigor of the scientific method in order to determine if they're correct. The preponderance of evidence indicates overwhelmingly that wifi is safe. There are academics opposing pretty much all views, that is the nature of academia. Opposing view alone mean nothing.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell By reading your response I see that you didn't go to the magdahavas site. The studies I have pointed you to are in pdf form. They are studies from the U.S. military, Germany , and Russia. Are they kooks too? Is everyone that disagrees with you just simply termed a "kook"? If you go to the magdahavas site and click on the Zory Glacer archive button you will find way more than just one study. On just one of these titles there are 2000 documents regarding the subject.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 There can be 10 million documents. But if they can't withstand the scientific method, they're not worth anything. Anyone can publish anything they want on their sites. There are academics that validate conspiracy theories (like this one). But unless their work is peer reviewed and withstands that review, in which case it will be somewhere else other than someones website (like in a scientific journal) its not worth reading. Its non-science.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Wow! Talk about being bias! if anyone reading your response took the time to read all the documents from all the different agencies and countries that I have given, they would see you don't know the subject at all.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 I don't need to know the subject. You don't need to listen to the ramblings of kooks to understand that its invalid knowledge. There is no way you could first read all content on a subject and then make a merit based decision on its validity. Its why we have processes that do this for us. The Journals I mentioned. Many uneducated people are convinced by the letters after peoples names. I have letters after my name too. The letters don't make you more or less correct.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell Just because it hasn't happened to you yet don't knock it. It's just a matter of time before you will get the same symptoms. In the meantime make sure your cell phone is right next to your head when you sleep. Keep your wifi on in your bedroom. I have had a cell phone since 1995, maybe thats the problem.

[sdarvell]

@2011so5 My house has many wifi transmitters. Wifi has been conclusively proven to be safe. Its as safe as your TV. Your TV computer and alarm clock emit radiation too. But its a safe level of radiation. What makes your claim nonsense is that your combining cell phone signals and wifi signals as a cause. They're significantly different frequencies. No respected academic has linked negative health effects to either of those technologies in the way this video portrays. It's just not real.

[2011so5]

@sdarvell I would suggest that you first check out what's going on inside the cell "inner life of the cell". I have compiled a list of favorite videos. Maybe check them out? justproveit is another great site.

[sdarvell]

She could tell the mast was on or off 2/3 of the time... Well statistically she should be able to get at least 1/2 so 2/3 of the time isn't that significant. I'm guessing there were people who could only tell 1/3 of the time as well. If she really was getting physiological effects from wifi, she would experience those effects every time. If something burns me, I can tell its happening more than 2/3 of the time.

[TheKiemaster]

Why is our Goverment doing this, do they want us dead?

[Capeau]

@TheKiemaster

money money money

[ihateyoujerkoff]

wow ! im amazed ! i thought sweden was just full of nordic thugs running around hacking enemies heads off ! now they even have sweaters ! kudos to sweden !

[123norway]

ironicly i watched this using wifi :P Going to hardwire it know...

[sandaura]

Pure Tones which are radiating from utilities lines everywhere are a health hazard to all living things. This noise is in ever home in the USA where wireless is transmitting. People around the world are hearing the constant buzzing, oscillating and rumbling this transmission is causing. This is effecting our eco systems. Please get involved.

[ihateyoujerkoff]

@sandaura i dont understand, do you mean to increase electro pollution? i think so, so im plugging everything in and frying everyones brain ! thanks for the advice !

[pidos847]

We are being poisoned in so many ways. The water we drink has fluoride along with many other toxins, the food supply has hormones and chemical fertilizers added to it, and the air is contaminated with airborne bacteria and now we have harmful electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) being transmitted through the air. Cell phones, cordless phones and satellites broadcast EMF that causes cancer. The government knows about all of this but they don't tell us because they want to kill us. Stop the NWO!

[ivanrlynn]

ok so we pollute the airwaves with wifi and pollute the air we breath with our cars and such all we need it for us to be putting somethng in the water we drink that can damage us, Oh wait...

[freepress666]

if you put an EM blast out in a small city people immediate fell better of course it will destroy all electronics

[WeCanAllGetAllong]

Thanks for getting the info out there poster. Good series!

[soujasimon]

i love your mum!!!