It's nice to see people interested in this and proud of their History. :) Although i'm find it bloody hard at college, hence why i'm looking on here for some help. :L
I would like to make a point. At the battle of Dorylaeum, there was not a single Christian knight killed by the mounted archers. It is not easy to shoot at someone while mounted on a horse let alone with a bow and arrow while galloping. When the arrows did find their target, the Christian knights were so heavily armored that the arrows would literally bounce off of them. That is according to Jonathan Riley-Smith and other medieval historians. But this is a good video.
This was really good and helpful...for my homework i had to write a report on the first crusade-before i watched this i was clueless, now i have a really good understanding of it...thanks! :~)
Godfrey's role in the first crusade is overrated since he had been the first ruler in Jerusalem he was idealized in later accounts. In truth he was not a main figure but just one of the several leaders of the crusade. Raymond IV of Toulouse, Bohemund of Taranto, Robert of Flanders, Stephen of Blois are often forgotten.
Stephen of Blois was a bit of a coward altough he was a good warrior the others were more than him altough I understand your point that so many crusader leaders were forgoten Godfrey is the best I mean he is the one that actualy didnt do it for glory or wealth but for faith! Godfrey refuse to the leader or ruler of Jerusalem! His brother did not in fact he abandoned the crusade to search for land for himself Bohemund was more preocupied with land and wealth than faith
This is an excellent video and narrative. Bravery and idealism of the people that participated gives me shivers. There is an excellent story of the crusades produced by the Teaching Company:Era of the Crusades
great vid my friend, thumbs up & added to favs. I knew that Godfrey died sometime after jerusalem fell, but i wasn't aware he died by a poisoned arrow at the 1st siege of Acre 1104. It is said that when the situation became threatening during battle, Godfrey would turn the tide, once i read that with 1 stroke with his sword he litterally cut a saracen in half . Men like him & Bogemond of Taranto we need today. Great choise about Conan music, i loved evry bit of it :)))))) Deus lo Vult.
@MrTRONSTAR During Godfrey's time & the 1st Crusade, the Templas didn't even existed mate, only after the fall of Jerusalem the religious orders started to establish themselvs with pope's approval. & although the Hospital of st.John of the Hospitallers was established in Jerusalem in 1080 & they were forming from before the 1st Crusade, they were only offically founded in 1099 after jerusalem fell, to protect pilgrims & the Holy Spulcher. The Templars started much after, in 1119.
Magnifique video une fois de plus ! Vraiment, la musique de Poledouris s'harmonise merveilleusement bien avec le récit. L'intensité des batailles, la tension, l'entrée dans Jérusalem...L'épique et le mystique s'en trouvent entremêlés, et c'est ce qui me fascine dans cette Croisade. Bravo ! Et vive la France !
@ThePatriot213 Yep, see Seljuk raids in Anatolia, Moors in span and France, Unprovoked war against Byzantine Empire from the Arabs, invasion of Crete, Malta and Sicily.
@thecajuncutthroat, maybe you should include Jean Parisot de la Valette as part of your list of French warriors in your other video. He was a nobleman from France who soon rose through the ranks and becomes the Grand Master of the Hospitaller order, He was most notably famed for defeating an Ottoman invasion force at Malta in 1565. His family has a rich history for participating in almost every crusade.
@thecajuncutthroat Thanks. Were the French (or France) considered brutal and uncivilizied back in the Crusades period (the Middle Ages, 11th-13th Centuries)?
@badmacdonald, the reason why the French wanted an alliance with the Ottoman empire, was because they desired the destruction of the Hapsburg empire, France's primary enemy. What is wrong in making an alliance with a Muslim nation? Is it because of religion. The British commited atrocites too in their history, they practically eradicated all of the Indians in North America, by using small pox as a biological weapon.
expertstrategy, it was not "France", but many adventurers from western Europe, who went in the Fourth Crusade. AFAIK the main result was the conquest of ... a Christian, although schismatic empire, Byzance.
Shortly after the first crusade, a myth suddenly sprung up about "Frankish invincibility" this myth spread fear among the saracens throughout the middle east. They were afraid of them because of that myth
No siege, no long bloody battles against fanatics, no continental crossing...
Just One battle,
Just One victory,
And England got ruled by the frankish for over 3 centuries, the time that finally took to bring them to our ''level''. (those idiots dont like us for that)
Though they still dont have understood everything in Christiacism...
Cette video nous rappelle que la croisade que mène notre égorgeur cajun national contre l'oubli confortable est encore plus hasardeuse que la première. A côté, l'épopée des premiers croisés, c'était une sorte de randonnée scout et les Fatimides, une bande de nains en porte-jartelles ;-)
peut être que ça a permis des avancés je veut bien l'admettre mais ce n'est pas une époque glorieuse je suis désolé passionnante oui mais pas à envier, autant que la seconde guerre mondiale qui est un cataclysme, dans se cas là on a cas en refaire une d'époque "glorieuse" vous seriez ravis non?
Très belle vidéo comme d' habitude d' ailleurs ! La musique est très bien choisie on est littéralement transporté. Les croisades quelle période fascinante de notre histoire, mélange de ferveur religieuse et d'héroïsme.
Cajun comme d'habitude superbe video , la musique de Conan est trés belle , malgré tous dommage que ce ne soit pas celle de Kingdom of Heaven , je pense qu'elle aurait parfaitement correspondu à cette magnifique video
quel vidéo et quel musique chapeau l'artiste!! les croisades que de grand hommes, des Saints!! y a plus de guerriers de cette trempe de nos jours! ...........nostalgie!
nostalgique? c'est une guerre de fanatiques comme Al Kaida et les autres islamistes font en ce moment, cette guerre n'a servit à rien par ailleurs tu est nostalgique des massacres de la par des croisés? tu appele ça des grands hommes? tu préconise la même chose aujourd'hui? 0_o
pas du tout, même si cela étais une autre époque, "VAE VICTIS" . je ne pense pas que les croisades soient des guerres inutiles, bien au contraire! l'Europe a fait un grand bon technologique grâce au croisades, et puis je dit que se sont de grand Hommes OUI! car ils ont tout sacrifier pour une cause qu'ils croyaient juste qui somme nous pour juger des gens qui prenaient d'assaut des forteresse, et qui sont mort pour une cause juste! (le pape la dit a l'époque! DIEU LE VEUX!)
et personnellement je ne vois pas la différence entre les croisés et les militaires d'aujourd'hui qui risque aussi leur vie pour une cause, après qu'elle soit bonne ou mauvaise chacun son avis sur la question (pour moi c'est une bonne cause)
Médecine, en astronomie, en chimie, en géographie, en mathématique, en architecture, les Franj ont tire leurs connaissances des arabes qu'ils ont assimilés, imités, puis dépassés. que de mots portent encore le témoignage: Zénith, Nadir, Azimut, Algèbre, Algorithme, ou bien "chiffre" , il y a tellement d'exemple...... la cause était juste pour les gens de l'époque! et puis je te garanti que les militaire (dont je fait partie) ne risque pas leur vie pour une cause....
euuh ses avancés ne sont pas forcément issus des croisades, il y a eus beaucoup plus déchanges constructifs en espagne alors qu'elle était arabes, lors des croisades on a prit les arabes plus pour des barbares que pour des être à connaissance...
@vicenzo77 mais bien pour la solde qui nous est donner fin de moi, ou les primes de missions, j'ai été 4foix a Kaboul est ce que cela a changer quelque chose? non! a part que j'ai toucher mes primes et c'est bien la seule chose qui ma motiver a partir c'est l'argent, le nerf de la guerre! et non je ne suis pas fanatique ou extrémiste, et je n'occulte pas le fait que les Franj ont massacre et même dévorer les populations arabes, mais c'est le fruit de l'époque, moi perso je n'étais pas la!
ah ok tu m'apprend quelquechose maintenant, nos soldats sont des mercenaires ok je retient merci pour l'info d'ailleurs cela me surprend que des militaire risque leur vie pour un salaire aussi médiocre... ;) donc après si des hommes commettant des massacres sont des grands hommes pour toi, désolé je ne suis pas d'accord
@vicenzo77 est ce que tu connait les primes de risque en mission extérieur? presque 4000euros en plus du salaire par mois, en plus certain contractor us gagne jusqu'à 18000 ou 20000 euros par mois! moi j'appelle ça du mercenariat!
pourquoi se focaliser sur les massacres? ceux qui ont massacrer les nobles pendent la terreur ne sont ils pas des grand hommes de l'histoire? je voulait dire par grand homme ceux qui osent tout risquer sans être sur de vivre comme l'ont fait les croises!
4 000 euros pour les risques que les soldats prennent je trouve ça médiocre et pour les amerloc c'est bien ce que je dit c'est des mercenaires. Mais heureusement que tout les militaires ne pensent pas comme toi et ont le sentiment de servir à autre chose... Pourquoi ce focaliser sur les massacres? parce que ses massacres n'ont servit strictement à rien et était gratuit (au nom de dieux super!)alors que le massacre des nobles à eus pour but la liberté
donc d'accord je veut bien admettre qu'il y a eus des avancé mais ne dit pas que ces hommes étaient des grands hommes et qu'on doit prendre exemple sur eux parce que c'est faux, pour moi un grand homme c'est un homme d'honneur et le massacre des population (n'importe lesquelles) n'en font pas des grands hommes après si pour toi il le reste c'est ton problème moi je ne bougerais pas de ma position sur ce sujet, chacun son point de vue comme on dit..
on doit penser à ses massacres parce qu'il font partie de l'histoire et qu'il ne faux pas passé au travers, autant que le massacres commis par les nazis, parce que si on les oublis ses massacres les nazis par exemple, seront considérés comme des grands guerriers ou conquérant comme tu fait avec les croisés, sa permet de voir leur vrai visage peut être que ça a permis des avancé mais c'est pas une raison pour les justifiés et considérés comme des grands hommes
et dans tout le lot des croisés tu ne crois pas qu'il y en avait qui y sont allé juste pour s'enrichir des pillages? Je ne crois pas en un élan spontané héroique il faut relativisé et ne pas se focaliser sur les témoignage de cette époque qui ne sont pas très objectif selon moi, et je ne crois pas en l'innocence de l'église qui a certainement vus le moyen de s'étendre et de s'enrichir donc nan je ne trouve pas cette période glorieuse, passionante oui mais pas glorieuse...
Duke Normandy wasnt vassal of King.of France by this time was part of Kingdmon of England and they werent vassals like forever they always wage war with France.
And what matters that count of Flanders was a vassal?His nationalaty was flemish
Then how about Edgar of England or Embriaco of Genoa? Like I said the french were essencial in Crusade but was joint european effort you must not discard the numbers of europeans that werent name and had various orings
Normans were french at this time for simple reasons :
When they were authorized by Treaty to settle in France (treaty of Chartres, after their defeat against the Franks in 910), the Normans were just a little group. They immediatly mixed with locals, and adopted quickly french culture, language, religion, DNA etc...
And in 1066, on the BAYEUX TAPESTRY, telling the conquest of England, Normans called themselves "the FRANKS".
Before I write something else lahired081 I dont want to turns this into nationalistic figth of two or more persons shooting wich country people nation are better and bla bla or atitudes of calling the other side ignorant and needs to go to school again if you want to discuss history fine by me if you want to correct me because you tough I was wrong ok but do it with little of humility
Tell me just one thing wrong in what I wrote if you can...
You can't deny Normans were ASSIMILATED by French in 11th century.
Your only argument "normans wage war in france" is crappy.
In a feodal era, there were often conflicts between french king and his nervous vassals (Normans, Burgunds, Angevin etc...).
But there were also partnerships : young Guillaume was very happy to find shelter at the french king's court, when he was threatened by another norman faction...
You argument about Williams seeking shelter at frenck kings coutry is the one inddeed crappy xD
That doesnt prove nothing Edgar the "deposed king of England" was in shelter in Hungary that doesnt make him Hungarian
True was feudal time war may happen betwen vassals not necessary different in nationalaty but you forget one thing some vassals of France were indeed of different nationalaties Flanders Bryttany do you find bretons and flemish french? Many times they even seek independence by means
of war. When was a Vassal war like for example Barons Revolt in England ok is civil war is english vs english or in case of France french vs french but one a duchy a vassal is people is indeed of different nationalaty or origins is feudal war?I simply dont know or anyone knows if indeed the Normans had a lot of norse settlers I always find Normans a different people that said I dont denny their frank or french origin thus i dont denny their norse origins aswell was the mix of the two that
make the normans in first place the normans never saw their alliange to the king of France neither they saw themselfs in french nationalaty
They saw themselfs as Normans their leader the Duke or as many times happen they seek venture elsewhere like in Italy with their own made up leaders
They indeed culturaly religiosly adminstritive were close to franks but politicaly and national they were different body of French this what I think at least XD fell free to counter argument
Flanders and Brittany =/= Normandy. Normans spoke French (old oil) had the same traditions and apart a few norse drop of blood were like the rest of the French . In a feudal Kingdom, every duchy wanted to gain more territories and power. So the duke of Normandy fought against his King, and the Barons fought against the Dukes, then the Duke was helped by the King. The relations of power were complew, but by all mean the Normand were French.
Guillaume's army were composed by various french people, non-normans at 50%.
Guillaume himself have sung the "Song of Roland", old Frankish war anthem, just before the battle. He considered himself as French and spoke old french.
Guillaume and other Duke of Normandy were VASSALS of French king !
So, the kings of England were also french king vassals.
During a long time, Aristocracy leading England came from France, imposing laws and french language. Do you know that english language is composed by 40 of french words ?
Do you know that richard Coeur de Lion was french ? He didn't know any word in English and spoke only french. He spent only 6 mounths of his life in Britain and don't have a fuck of it, just syphoning its ressources to finance his wars in orient or in France, against his lord, Philippe Augustus of France.
- "The small groups of Vikings that settled there adopted the language, religion and culture of the French majority. After a generation or two, the Normans were indistinguishable from the French".
Encyclopaedia Britannica
- "During the century and a half after the Conquest, there is no English history. The French Kings of England rose to an eminence which was the wonder of all nations".
Duke of Normandy was of course a vassal of France. Normandy was not " a part of the Kingdom of England", it is more correct to say that French people had a empire where England and patrs of France were reunited.
I dont think so I always find normans a different people from french that said doesnt mean that they werent inflenced by them I think they were mix of vikings and franks or french population of Normandy you can see this in their language was pretty french but normanzied with norse words etc also if you see their way of warfare always looking for conquest like vikings ;) thats why I always saw them as diferent well Normandy by this time altougth still "official" vassals of France
Was part of Kingdmon of England this was after William conquest of England dont forget that.
And vassals well they werent lot vassals were they? How many times normans wage war with France and vice versa? I always tough they were vassals only in name
First there is no "vassal" in France anymore ! Because we are not an feudal kingdom. Then we can't say that Normans were different from the rest of the French because the Scandinavians were not numerous enough to change the local population which is, like the rest of France, celtic (gauls) romanized then christianized, that's why there is no difference in 1066 or today (i am from normandy myself by the way) .
True but I always find that Gallo Romans presence after the "Barbarian Invasions" was more strong in South of France with North of France with stronger presence of Franks this just idea I can be wrong on this. Like another youtuber said sometimes the Normans were refered as Franks not Kelts
@ImperialGuard9001 There is no "seeing". There are facts, or untruths and interpretations. Vikings were Vikings. Normans, were and are French. From as far as they were called Normans, and not Vikings/Norse anymore, they were in terms of DNA, ethnicity, language and culture French.
Tes videos sont importantes, Cajun. Beacoup plus que tu ne pourrais l'imaginer, en fait. Enormement de gens (moi y compris) connaissent peu leur Histoire et toutes les subtilitées qui la compose. Grace à toi, nous pouvons mieux l'apréhender et c'est vraiment tout à ton honneur, mon ami...
But France also repelled muslims between 732-737 saving western europe from muslim conquest. The French did contribute greatly to siege of Jerusalem liberating the Holy Land.
Descendants de colons francais et appellés les "acadiens" une région de la Nouvelle-Écosse et du Nouveau-Brunswick au Canada "l'Acadie".
Les anglais brulérent des villages entiers,réunirent les colons restant et les déportérent vers la Louisiane.Une tragédie encore ressentie aujourdhui, Génocide fait par le colonel Moncton qui donna son nom à la ville de Moncton.
Très belle vidéo, comme d'habitude; j'ajouterais juste que le malheureux sac de Jérusalem a fait des victimes parmi toute la population chrétienne et non chrétienne, ce n'était donc pas un massacre religieux et c important de le noter.
Impossible les Fatimides avaient expulsés les ressortissants chrétiens de la ville quand ils apprirent les intentions des croisés. C'est ce qui leur a évité le sort de leurs concitoyens musulmans puisqu'ils purent revenir dans la cité après la conquête.
@hommechauvesouris Exact aux Juifs il fut reproché tous les maux de l'antisémitisme classique dont bien sur la mort de Jésus. De plus ils avaient participé à la défense de la cité, contraints ou non. Toutefois les croisés étaient fatigués, leur périple avait duré 3 ans et Jérusalem était l'acte libérateur de leur croisade. Le massacre peut se lire dans la libération que fut pour eux la prise des murs et donc dans une frustration d'abord refoulée qu'ils exprimaient enfin.
il est surtout prouvé que la plupart des massacres eurent pour mobile le contexte guerrier (meurtre des non chrétiens aussi bien que des cgrétiens grecs) et psychologique de l'époque (le musulman infidel, le juif perfide, le grec pervers et éfféminé), absolument pas pour des motifs religieux justifiés par l'Évangile, ce en quoi les Francs auraient été bien en peine de trouver.....!!
Pourtant les motifs religieux sont tout trouvé. Les musulmans infidèle et ennemi numéro un de par la guerre et les juifs meurtrié du Christ. Les motifs religieux vont avec le contexte de l'époque, ils ne sont pas disociable.
Je dois dire que je commence bien l'année sur youtube avec cette vidéo dont tu nous gratifie Cajun, texte pertinent, belles illustrations et une music prenante... T'es un AS !
Ca me fait de la peine de voir ce a quoi un pays au passe si glorieux comme la France a ete rabaisse au cours des dernieres decennies. Il est temps de redorer le blason que nous ont laisse nos ancetres.
Excellent video. Too often the Crusades are seen in a negative way rather than as a a long overdue counterattack by Europe.
One thing though. While the French phrase Dieu le veut is sometimes seen, usually the Crusader motto was the Latin phrase, Deus vult. Latin was seen to be the unifying language of a united Christendom rather than the local languages of French, English, German, etc.
proud to be a descendant of Norman knights, and Spartans. Time to kick Iranian asses next.
soNofLeoniDasandLas 2 months ago 2
It's nice to see people interested in this and proud of their History. :) Although i'm find it bloody hard at college, hence why i'm looking on here for some help. :L
XzozoX123 4 months ago
I would like to make a point. At the battle of Dorylaeum, there was not a single Christian knight killed by the mounted archers. It is not easy to shoot at someone while mounted on a horse let alone with a bow and arrow while galloping. When the arrows did find their target, the Christian knights were so heavily armored that the arrows would literally bounce off of them. That is according to Jonathan Riley-Smith and other medieval historians. But this is a good video.
thefreeman8791 4 months ago
thank you christian crusaders for my freedom in the west
flwrswit 5 months ago 7
I'm french and i'm proud of my country's history.
zocplus 7 months ago 12
Immortal glory for crusaders !
ssnakessnake2 7 months ago 11
This was really good and helpful...for my homework i had to write a report on the first crusade-before i watched this i was clueless, now i have a really good understanding of it...thanks! :~)
CHAR9292 7 months ago 2
Deus lo vult!
c0nconc0n18 8 months ago
Comment removed
TFTekla 8 months ago
Godfrey's role in the first crusade is overrated since he had been the first ruler in Jerusalem he was idealized in later accounts. In truth he was not a main figure but just one of the several leaders of the crusade. Raymond IV of Toulouse, Bohemund of Taranto, Robert of Flanders, Stephen of Blois are often forgotten.
dreed1984 8 months ago 4
Stephen of Blois was a bit of a coward altough he was a good warrior the others were more than him altough I understand your point that so many crusader leaders were forgoten Godfrey is the best I mean he is the one that actualy didnt do it for glory or wealth but for faith! Godfrey refuse to the leader or ruler of Jerusalem! His brother did not in fact he abandoned the crusade to search for land for himself Bohemund was more preocupied with land and wealth than faith
ImperialGuard9001 8 months ago
@dreed1984 And so were both of his Brothers, it is true that Godefroy role during the Crusade was overrated.
salutfiu 3 months ago
VIVAT!
10WiseVirgins 9 months ago
This is absolutely brilliant! Well done!
vansgharl 9 months ago 6
This is an excellent video and narrative. Bravery and idealism of the people that participated gives me shivers. There is an excellent story of the crusades produced by the Teaching Company:Era of the Crusades
I warmly recommend it.
lucius10101 11 months ago 6
awsome video! can i use this for a project that im doing?
grantman1000 11 months ago 4
5 étoiles
billbocate 1 year ago 4
god bless the cruisades !!!!
distick63 1 year ago 8
Excellent video and an excellent choice of music.
74brooklynboi 1 year ago 3
great vid my friend, thumbs up & added to favs. I knew that Godfrey died sometime after jerusalem fell, but i wasn't aware he died by a poisoned arrow at the 1st siege of Acre 1104. It is said that when the situation became threatening during battle, Godfrey would turn the tide, once i read that with 1 stroke with his sword he litterally cut a saracen in half . Men like him & Bogemond of Taranto we need today. Great choise about Conan music, i loved evry bit of it :)))))) Deus lo Vult.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago 2
I THINK HE WAS ONE OF THE GREAT KNIGHTS TAMPLAR later the world gave them a bad name!!!!!
MrTRONSTAR 1 year ago
@MrTRONSTAR During Godfrey's time & the 1st Crusade, the Templas didn't even existed mate, only after the fall of Jerusalem the religious orders started to establish themselvs with pope's approval. & although the Hospital of st.John of the Hospitallers was established in Jerusalem in 1080 & they were forming from before the 1st Crusade, they were only offically founded in 1099 after jerusalem fell, to protect pilgrims & the Holy Spulcher. The Templars started much after, in 1119.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago 2
Bonne vidéo avec la musique de Conan le barbare.
laclefdevoute 1 year ago
Bravo à toi et en plus les images sont bien choisies (images de mount and blade ^^)
puis les faits sont vraiment bien relatés.
Waffel22 1 year ago
super vidéo !partie de l'histoire hyper intéressante ,a plus !
Mrmontgommeryburns 1 year ago
Magnifique video une fois de plus ! Vraiment, la musique de Poledouris s'harmonise merveilleusement bien avec le récit. L'intensité des batailles, la tension, l'entrée dans Jérusalem...L'épique et le mystique s'en trouvent entremêlés, et c'est ce qui me fascine dans cette Croisade. Bravo ! Et vive la France !
Pauperpaulus 1 year ago
Godefroy is a forefather of mine. It is cool to learn about the things your forefathers have done.
kraigthorne 1 year ago 2
Mount & Blade, wouhouuu, from @2:19 to @2:31
Bon, on va se faire un petit siège là?
sinon, vidéo très intéressante, merci!
tounecaneton 1 year ago 3
against the french ;)
frenchrepresnt 1 year ago 2
Brutal euroupe, led by a violent christian idiology. Horrific!!!!!!! And they have nerve to talk about Islam. Huh.
MRDINIRO 1 year ago
@MRDINIRO Uh... the Crusades were a response to Islamic aggression towards Europe.
ThePatriot213 1 year ago 8
@ThePatriot213 Ha! no one ever starts a war do they its always a response to previous aggressions.
XXGDUBSXX 1 year ago
@ThePatriot213 Yep, see Seljuk raids in Anatolia, Moors in span and France, Unprovoked war against Byzantine Empire from the Arabs, invasion of Crete, Malta and Sicily.
AegeanKing 1 year ago
@thecajuncutthroat, maybe you should include Jean Parisot de la Valette as part of your list of French warriors in your other video. He was a nobleman from France who soon rose through the ranks and becomes the Grand Master of the Hospitaller order, He was most notably famed for defeating an Ottoman invasion force at Malta in 1565. His family has a rich history for participating in almost every crusade.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
@presidentcolbert
The english at this time were under French conquest.
DynastieFrancais87 1 year ago 2
@thecajuncutthroat Thanks. Were the French (or France) considered brutal and uncivilizied back in the Crusades period (the Middle Ages, 11th-13th Centuries)?
presidentcolbert 1 year ago
@thecajuncutthroat, I'm wondering, how did France win the Fourth Crusade. I haven't been able to get a straight answer for a while?
expertstrategy 1 year ago
the first crusaders were like the "mongols" of their time, they marched on to Jerusalem like an unstoppable tide.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
si jamais tu as besoin du theme de Poledouris du film Flesh+Blood (siege of the city) pour une de tes futures vidéos, je peux te le donner...
Aelkamal 1 year ago
Comment removed
Aelkamal 1 year ago
LOVE IT!!!!!
Strategos300 1 year ago
badmacdonald, parle en francais ou casse toi.
Ras-le-cul de ces connards d'anglo-saxons.
Merci pour ton attention.
Draksen 1 year ago
@badmacdonald, the reason why the French wanted an alliance with the Ottoman empire, was because they desired the destruction of the Hapsburg empire, France's primary enemy. What is wrong in making an alliance with a Muslim nation? Is it because of religion. The British commited atrocites too in their history, they practically eradicated all of the Indians in North America, by using small pox as a biological weapon.
expertstrategy 1 year ago 8
@expertstrategy
Don't forget the aborigines in australia also.
BourbonDynastie 1 year ago
@thecajuncutthroat great work cajun.
jhnb12876 1 year ago
@thecajuncutthroat, I'm wondering, how did France win the Fourth Crusade? and what were the results?
expertstrategy 2 years ago
expertstrategy, it was not "France", but many adventurers from western Europe, who went in the Fourth Crusade. AFAIK the main result was the conquest of ... a Christian, although schismatic empire, Byzance.
Fridomfry 1 year ago
Shortly after the first crusade, a myth suddenly sprung up about "Frankish invincibility" this myth spread fear among the saracens throughout the middle east. They were afraid of them because of that myth
expertstrategy 2 years ago 39
Je ne me lasse pas de cette video. Merci encore Cajun!
Imperator1982 2 years ago 2
@Imperator1982 moi non plus je la regarde sans arrêt y a pas un jour sans , merci beaucoup
zyonelg 2 years ago 2
Amazing video..
Thanks for sharing
gilcarosio 2 years ago
EASIEST FRENCH CRUSADE EVER :
Thats England.
No siege, no long bloody battles against fanatics, no continental crossing...
Just One battle,
Just One victory,
And England got ruled by the frankish for over 3 centuries, the time that finally took to bring them to our ''level''. (those idiots dont like us for that)
Though they still dont have understood everything in Christiacism...
MrPlantagenet 2 years ago 9
A propos de Mount & Blade, c'est le seul jeu qui arrive à retranscrire une véritable ambiance médiévale.
Montjoie84 2 years ago
@Montjoie84 medieval II total war
FabuleuxFab88 1 year ago
Magnifique video. Cela me donne presque envie de relire l'épopée des croisades de René Grousset. passionnant et EPIQUE !
Merci beaucoup et bonne continuation.
Montjoie84 2 years ago 16
@Montjoie84
Merci beaucoup.
J'ai relu le livre de Grousset (l'épopée de Croisades) ainsi que celui de Maalouf (les Croisades vues par les Arabes) avant de faire la vidéo.
Passionnant croisement de points de vue !
thecajuncutthroat 2 years ago 11
@thecajuncutthroat vraiment content d'être abonné a ton site c'est tout simplement incroyable
distick63 10 months ago 2
Merci monsieur Cajun par ce vrai cadeau de bonne année . Vous ^etes aussi un bon artiste.
Salutations
uerkengetorix 2 years ago 2
Tiens, tu joues a Mount and Blade toi?
tobaritchpingun 2 years ago
Bon, bah...5 étoiles, comme d'hab.
Cette video nous rappelle que la croisade que mène notre égorgeur cajun national contre l'oubli confortable est encore plus hasardeuse que la première. A côté, l'épopée des premiers croisés, c'était une sorte de randonnée scout et les Fatimides, une bande de nains en porte-jartelles ;-)
indexelbow 2 years ago 26
Excellente vidéo, thecajuncutthroat! La musique est très bien choisi comme d'habitude.
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago
""Richard Coeur de Lion was a bad English king. He was no Englishman.
William Stubbs
Dude, for more details about French kings of England, check PLANTAGENET DYNASTY.
lahire081 2 years ago 4
Richard Coeur de Lion searching funds for the Crusade :
"I would have sold London if I could find a buyer."
lahire081 2 years ago 3
peut être que ça a permis des avancés je veut bien l'admettre mais ce n'est pas une époque glorieuse je suis désolé passionnante oui mais pas à envier, autant que la seconde guerre mondiale qui est un cataclysme, dans se cas là on a cas en refaire une d'époque "glorieuse" vous seriez ravis non?
vicenzo77 2 years ago
@vicenzo77
Le Tasso, Poussin, Rousseau, Goethe, Monteverdi, Tiepolo, Haendel, Jouve, Delacroix, Dvorak...
La première croisade a aussi inspiré les plus grands artistes et écrivains.
thecajuncutthroat 2 years ago
Très belle vidéo comme d' habitude d' ailleurs ! La musique est très bien choisie on est littéralement transporté. Les croisades quelle période fascinante de notre histoire, mélange de ferveur religieuse et d'héroïsme.
Boleon05 2 years ago
Très bonne vidéo! Bravo à toi cajun et bonne année aussi!
Nettempereur 2 years ago
not for the first, for the second ok
vicenzo77 2 years ago
Cajun comme d'habitude superbe video , la musique de Conan est trés belle , malgré tous dommage que ce ne soit pas celle de Kingdom of Heaven , je pense qu'elle aurait parfaitement correspondu à cette magnifique video
jeffkodiac 2 years ago
quel vidéo et quel musique chapeau l'artiste!! les croisades que de grand hommes, des Saints!! y a plus de guerriers de cette trempe de nos jours! ...........nostalgie!
zyonelg 2 years ago
nostalgique? c'est une guerre de fanatiques comme Al Kaida et les autres islamistes font en ce moment, cette guerre n'a servit à rien par ailleurs tu est nostalgique des massacres de la par des croisés? tu appele ça des grands hommes? tu préconise la même chose aujourd'hui? 0_o
vicenzo77 2 years ago
pas du tout, même si cela étais une autre époque, "VAE VICTIS" . je ne pense pas que les croisades soient des guerres inutiles, bien au contraire! l'Europe a fait un grand bon technologique grâce au croisades, et puis je dit que se sont de grand Hommes OUI! car ils ont tout sacrifier pour une cause qu'ils croyaient juste qui somme nous pour juger des gens qui prenaient d'assaut des forteresse, et qui sont mort pour une cause juste! (le pape la dit a l'époque! DIEU LE VEUX!)
zyonelg 2 years ago
et personnellement je ne vois pas la différence entre les croisés et les militaires d'aujourd'hui qui risque aussi leur vie pour une cause, après qu'elle soit bonne ou mauvaise chacun son avis sur la question (pour moi c'est une bonne cause)
vicenzo77 2 years ago
Médecine, en astronomie, en chimie, en géographie, en mathématique, en architecture, les Franj ont tire leurs connaissances des arabes qu'ils ont assimilés, imités, puis dépassés. que de mots portent encore le témoignage: Zénith, Nadir, Azimut, Algèbre, Algorithme, ou bien "chiffre" , il y a tellement d'exemple...... la cause était juste pour les gens de l'époque! et puis je te garanti que les militaire (dont je fait partie) ne risque pas leur vie pour une cause....
zyonelg 2 years ago
euuh ses avancés ne sont pas forcément issus des croisades, il y a eus beaucoup plus déchanges constructifs en espagne alors qu'elle était arabes, lors des croisades on a prit les arabes plus pour des barbares que pour des être à connaissance...
vicenzo77 2 years ago
@vicenzo77 mais bien pour la solde qui nous est donner fin de moi, ou les primes de missions, j'ai été 4foix a Kaboul est ce que cela a changer quelque chose? non! a part que j'ai toucher mes primes et c'est bien la seule chose qui ma motiver a partir c'est l'argent, le nerf de la guerre! et non je ne suis pas fanatique ou extrémiste, et je n'occulte pas le fait que les Franj ont massacre et même dévorer les populations arabes, mais c'est le fruit de l'époque, moi perso je n'étais pas la!
zyonelg 2 years ago
ah ok tu m'apprend quelquechose maintenant, nos soldats sont des mercenaires ok je retient merci pour l'info d'ailleurs cela me surprend que des militaire risque leur vie pour un salaire aussi médiocre... ;) donc après si des hommes commettant des massacres sont des grands hommes pour toi, désolé je ne suis pas d'accord
vicenzo77 2 years ago
@vicenzo77 est ce que tu connait les primes de risque en mission extérieur? presque 4000euros en plus du salaire par mois, en plus certain contractor us gagne jusqu'à 18000 ou 20000 euros par mois! moi j'appelle ça du mercenariat!
pourquoi se focaliser sur les massacres? ceux qui ont massacrer les nobles pendent la terreur ne sont ils pas des grand hommes de l'histoire? je voulait dire par grand homme ceux qui osent tout risquer sans être sur de vivre comme l'ont fait les croises!
zyonelg 2 years ago
4 000 euros pour les risques que les soldats prennent je trouve ça médiocre et pour les amerloc c'est bien ce que je dit c'est des mercenaires. Mais heureusement que tout les militaires ne pensent pas comme toi et ont le sentiment de servir à autre chose... Pourquoi ce focaliser sur les massacres? parce que ses massacres n'ont servit strictement à rien et était gratuit (au nom de dieux super!)alors que le massacre des nobles à eus pour but la liberté
vicenzo77 2 years ago
donc d'accord je veut bien admettre qu'il y a eus des avancé mais ne dit pas que ces hommes étaient des grands hommes et qu'on doit prendre exemple sur eux parce que c'est faux, pour moi un grand homme c'est un homme d'honneur et le massacre des population (n'importe lesquelles) n'en font pas des grands hommes après si pour toi il le reste c'est ton problème moi je ne bougerais pas de ma position sur ce sujet, chacun son point de vue comme on dit..
vicenzo77 2 years ago
on doit penser à ses massacres parce qu'il font partie de l'histoire et qu'il ne faux pas passé au travers, autant que le massacres commis par les nazis, parce que si on les oublis ses massacres les nazis par exemple, seront considérés comme des grands guerriers ou conquérant comme tu fait avec les croisés, sa permet de voir leur vrai visage peut être que ça a permis des avancé mais c'est pas une raison pour les justifiés et considérés comme des grands hommes
vicenzo77 2 years ago
et dans tout le lot des croisés tu ne crois pas qu'il y en avait qui y sont allé juste pour s'enrichir des pillages? Je ne crois pas en un élan spontané héroique il faut relativisé et ne pas se focaliser sur les témoignage de cette époque qui ne sont pas très objectif selon moi, et je ne crois pas en l'innocence de l'église qui a certainement vus le moyen de s'étendre et de s'enrichir donc nan je ne trouve pas cette période glorieuse, passionante oui mais pas glorieuse...
vicenzo77 2 years ago
For First Second Third all Crusades had various nationalaties it wasnt never fixed on one.
Tell me was Robert II of Flanders French?
Was Rober II of Normandy French?
Was Bohemond of Taranto French?
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
Duke of Normandy and count of Flanders were vassals of the french crown.
Bohemond was the son of Robert Guiscard of Hauteville. So, he had also french origins.
The first crusade is mostly french, other contribution are anecdotal.
That's why the crusader states are called "frankish states of Orient", and not "european states".
lahire081 2 years ago
Robert Guiscard was norman not french.
Duke Normandy wasnt vassal of King.of France by this time was part of Kingdmon of England and they werent vassals like forever they always wage war with France.
And what matters that count of Flanders was a vassal?His nationalaty was flemish
Then how about Edgar of England or Embriaco of Genoa? Like I said the french were essencial in Crusade but was joint european effort you must not discard the numbers of europeans that werent name and had various orings
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
You clearly don't known History.
Normans were french at this time for simple reasons :
When they were authorized by Treaty to settle in France (treaty of Chartres, after their defeat against the Franks in 910), the Normans were just a little group. They immediatly mixed with locals, and adopted quickly french culture, language, religion, DNA etc...
And in 1066, on the BAYEUX TAPESTRY, telling the conquest of England, Normans called themselves "the FRANKS".
lahire081 2 years ago
Before I write something else lahired081 I dont want to turns this into nationalistic figth of two or more persons shooting wich country people nation are better and bla bla or atitudes of calling the other side ignorant and needs to go to school again if you want to discuss history fine by me if you want to correct me because you tough I was wrong ok but do it with little of humility
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
Tell me just one thing wrong in what I wrote if you can...
You can't deny Normans were ASSIMILATED by French in 11th century.
Your only argument "normans wage war in france" is crappy.
In a feodal era, there were often conflicts between french king and his nervous vassals (Normans, Burgunds, Angevin etc...).
But there were also partnerships : young Guillaume was very happy to find shelter at the french king's court, when he was threatened by another norman faction...
lahire081 2 years ago 4
You argument about Williams seeking shelter at frenck kings coutry is the one inddeed crappy xD
That doesnt prove nothing Edgar the "deposed king of England" was in shelter in Hungary that doesnt make him Hungarian
True was feudal time war may happen betwen vassals not necessary different in nationalaty but you forget one thing some vassals of France were indeed of different nationalaties Flanders Bryttany do you find bretons and flemish french? Many times they even seek independence by means
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
of war. When was a Vassal war like for example Barons Revolt in England ok is civil war is english vs english or in case of France french vs french but one a duchy a vassal is people is indeed of different nationalaty or origins is feudal war?I simply dont know or anyone knows if indeed the Normans had a lot of norse settlers I always find Normans a different people that said I dont denny their frank or french origin thus i dont denny their norse origins aswell was the mix of the two that
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
make the normans in first place the normans never saw their alliange to the king of France neither they saw themselfs in french nationalaty
They saw themselfs as Normans their leader the Duke or as many times happen they seek venture elsewhere like in Italy with their own made up leaders
They indeed culturaly religiosly adminstritive were close to franks but politicaly and national they were different body of French this what I think at least XD fell free to counter argument
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
Tapestry de Bayeux : "FRANCI".
On that Masterpiece, Normans proved for eternity their will to be considered as FRANKS.
Use Historical matter, and not your heart to debate, dude.
And don't forget they sang the song of Roland before Hastings.
Don't forget they spoke french language and have more Frankish DNA than vikings in 1066.
Actually they have some particularities, but not more than the Burgunds, the Provencals or the Angevins...
lahire081 2 years ago 5
Flanders and Brittany =/= Normandy. Normans spoke French (old oil) had the same traditions and apart a few norse drop of blood were like the rest of the French . In a feudal Kingdom, every duchy wanted to gain more territories and power. So the duke of Normandy fought against his King, and the Barons fought against the Dukes, then the Duke was helped by the King. The relations of power were complew, but by all mean the Normand were French.
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago 5
@ImperialGuard9001
BAYEUX TAPESTRY (1066) :
"HIC FRANCI PUGNANT" meaning "here the french are fighting".
I think Guillaume the Conqueror, patron of the Tapestry, knows better than you who he was...
lahire081 2 years ago 5
@ImperialGuard9001
poor imbecile, of course edgar wasn't Hungarian.
he didn't speak hungarian and have hungarian culture like Guillaume spoke french and have french culture.
lahire081 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
Guillaume's army were composed by various french people, non-normans at 50%.
Guillaume himself have sung the "Song of Roland", old Frankish war anthem, just before the battle. He considered himself as French and spoke old french.
Guillaume and other Duke of Normandy were VASSALS of French king !
So, the kings of England were also french king vassals.
If you do not know that fact, return to school.
lahire081 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
During a long time, Aristocracy leading England came from France, imposing laws and french language. Do you know that english language is composed by 40 of french words ?
Do you know that richard Coeur de Lion was french ? He didn't know any word in English and spoke only french. He spent only 6 mounths of his life in Britain and don't have a fuck of it, just syphoning its ressources to finance his wars in orient or in France, against his lord, Philippe Augustus of France.
lahire081 2 years ago
@ImperialGuard9001
- "The small groups of Vikings that settled there adopted the language, religion and culture of the French majority. After a generation or two, the Normans were indistinguishable from the French".
Encyclopaedia Britannica
- "During the century and a half after the Conquest, there is no English history. The French Kings of England rose to an eminence which was the wonder of all nations".
Thomas Babington Macauley
lahire081 2 years ago
Duke of Normandy was of course a vassal of France. Normandy was not " a part of the Kingdom of England", it is more correct to say that French people had a empire where England and patrs of France were reunited.
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago
I dont think so I always find normans a different people from french that said doesnt mean that they werent inflenced by them I think they were mix of vikings and franks or french population of Normandy you can see this in their language was pretty french but normanzied with norse words etc also if you see their way of warfare always looking for conquest like vikings ;) thats why I always saw them as diferent well Normandy by this time altougth still "official" vassals of France
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
Was part of Kingdmon of England this was after William conquest of England dont forget that.
And vassals well they werent lot vassals were they? How many times normans wage war with France and vice versa? I always tough they were vassals only in name
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
First there is no "vassal" in France anymore ! Because we are not an feudal kingdom. Then we can't say that Normans were different from the rest of the French because the Scandinavians were not numerous enough to change the local population which is, like the rest of France, celtic (gauls) romanized then christianized, that's why there is no difference in 1066 or today (i am from normandy myself by the way) .
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago
Today I was talking back in that time.
Celtic Gauls? Were you get your info?
Did you forget the franks?
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
The Franks didn't genocide the local population, so the native people in France are a mix between Franks and Celts.
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago 3
True but I always find that Gallo Romans presence after the "Barbarian Invasions" was more strong in South of France with North of France with stronger presence of Franks this just idea I can be wrong on this. Like another youtuber said sometimes the Normans were refered as Franks not Kelts
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
Indeed the people of France refered themselves as Franks because the Franks are the ones who organized politically the country.
xxAdelineFcexx 2 years ago 4
Franks conquered an empire stretching from northern spain, saxony, and italy.
Guayas87 2 years ago 2
@ImperialGuard9001 There is no "seeing". There are facts, or untruths and interpretations. Vikings were Vikings. Normans, were and are French. From as far as they were called Normans, and not Vikings/Norse anymore, they were in terms of DNA, ethnicity, language and culture French.
AuxaneD 9 months ago 10
@ImperialGuard9001 its not england who invaded normandy, it's normandy who invaded england.
That's the part you still dont understand.
ManOWar2Red 1 year ago 3
By Frankish you mean what?
ImperialGuard9001 2 years ago
Toujours le même- impressionant!!!!! je vous salut mon ami!!!!
boss180888 2 years ago
Quelle fascinante, cette période de l'histoire!!!! C'est une belle production, mon ami!!!!
CadjinGisclair 2 years ago
bravo .... parfait comme d 'hab!
mr41980 2 years ago
Magnifique accord entre les images et la musique. Bravo!
Imperator1982 2 years ago
Superbe ! ! ! ! !
trixera99 2 years ago
Great vid,the music and the images match perfectly.
ViriathusVingathor 2 years ago
Tes videos sont importantes, Cajun. Beacoup plus que tu ne pourrais l'imaginer, en fait. Enormement de gens (moi y compris) connaissent peu leur Histoire et toutes les subtilitées qui la compose. Grace à toi, nous pouvons mieux l'apréhender et c'est vraiment tout à ton honneur, mon ami...
sirhill77 2 years ago 5
But France also repelled muslims between 732-737 saving western europe from muslim conquest. The French did contribute greatly to siege of Jerusalem liberating the Holy Land.
MrFrance87 2 years ago 3
great job, thx for sharing...btw, and a happy new year!
witzmix 2 years ago
Magnífico vídeo. Enhorabuena.
Europa Unida contra el Islam.
explorersl 2 years ago 2
Magnifique vidéo!
AStealthyRust 2 years ago
Très belle video et très reussie!
Bravo
skiteufr 2 years ago
Excellent !
On remet ça ?
Fleurdelix 2 years ago
OMG...that is all I can say
GentlemanGhost1 2 years ago
merci thecajuncutthroat pour le nom de la music..
habibamael 2 years ago
belle video,bien joué........5
RagingBull2A 2 years ago
Merci beaucoup pour cette vidéo, je connaissais pas bien les évènements des croisades.
Kamfrenchie 2 years ago
J'ai réellement apprécié cette vidéo pour un épisode de l'histoire Française que je connaissait peu. Merci thecajuncutthroat et beau boulot
ZEtruckipu 2 years ago
Grand merci pour cette super vidéo.
Beaucoup de recherches pour apporter un éclairage sur ces faits d'Histoire peu connus de tous.
Michel.
Ps : Super son...
MGROYAUME 2 years ago
Deus lo veult!
Wofka1986 2 years ago
@ thecajuncutthroat
Bonne année 2010 toi aussi !
Voici une merveilleuse chanson de
Zachary Richard,un cajun de la Louisiane
que j'ai déja vu en spectacle au Québec !
sur Youtube voici le titre,this song===>
Zachary Richard, etc. - Travailler c'est trop dur, etc.
LaNationQuebecoise 2 years ago
Outstanding My friend. Good to see you putting something out. I love historical things. Keep 'em commin!
pigfaceddog 2 years ago
L'histoire des cajuns est aussi pathétique !
D'une tristesse infinie.
Le 1er génocide en Amérique du Nord .
Descendants de colons francais et appellés les "acadiens" une région de la Nouvelle-Écosse et du Nouveau-Brunswick au Canada "l'Acadie".
Les anglais brulérent des villages entiers,réunirent les colons restant et les déportérent vers la Louisiane.Une tragédie encore ressentie aujourdhui, Génocide fait par le colonel Moncton qui donna son nom à la ville de Moncton.
LaNationQuebecoise 2 years ago
Les anglais ont ainsi inventé la déportation.
hommechauvesouris 2 years ago
Merci Cajun. It would be so brilliant if we did not forget our own History. Thank you for this superb video. Bonne annee.
TheWorldpatriot 2 years ago 2
Très belle vidéo, comme d'habitude; j'ajouterais juste que le malheureux sac de Jérusalem a fait des victimes parmi toute la population chrétienne et non chrétienne, ce n'était donc pas un massacre religieux et c important de le noter.
Merci tout de même
RegnumFrancorum 2 years ago
Impossible les Fatimides avaient expulsés les ressortissants chrétiens de la ville quand ils apprirent les intentions des croisés. C'est ce qui leur a évité le sort de leurs concitoyens musulmans puisqu'ils purent revenir dans la cité après la conquête.
CitoyendeRobespierre 2 years ago
exact, merci pour la correction, je confondais avec la prise d'Antioche, qd bien même certains chrétiens grecs ont aidé à la prise de la ville
RegnumFrancorum 2 years ago
mmmmhhh Il est prouvait que le meutre des populations non chretiennes fut délibéré, notamment juive.
hommechauvesouris 2 years ago
@hommechauvesouris Exact aux Juifs il fut reproché tous les maux de l'antisémitisme classique dont bien sur la mort de Jésus. De plus ils avaient participé à la défense de la cité, contraints ou non. Toutefois les croisés étaient fatigués, leur périple avait duré 3 ans et Jérusalem était l'acte libérateur de leur croisade. Le massacre peut se lire dans la libération que fut pour eux la prise des murs et donc dans une frustration d'abord refoulée qu'ils exprimaient enfin.
CitoyendeRobespierre 2 years ago
il est surtout prouvé que la plupart des massacres eurent pour mobile le contexte guerrier (meurtre des non chrétiens aussi bien que des cgrétiens grecs) et psychologique de l'époque (le musulman infidel, le juif perfide, le grec pervers et éfféminé), absolument pas pour des motifs religieux justifiés par l'Évangile, ce en quoi les Francs auraient été bien en peine de trouver.....!!
RegnumFrancorum 2 years ago
Pourtant les motifs religieux sont tout trouvé. Les musulmans infidèle et ennemi numéro un de par la guerre et les juifs meurtrié du Christ. Les motifs religieux vont avec le contexte de l'époque, ils ne sont pas disociable.
hommechauvesouris 2 years ago
oui, dans ce cas, l'appelation "motif religieux" est a prendre en différent sens
HenryWinni 2 years ago
quel est le nom de cet superbe chanson svp?
habibamael 2 years ago
@habibamael "Riders of Doom" de Basil Poledouris.
thecajuncutthroat 2 years ago
bien tourner comme docummentaire,vraiment bien fait!!!c'est une période peut connu de tous !!merci a toi...et bonne année!!
habibamael 2 years ago
The majority of crusaders were french. As a result among arabs Franc and european become synonymous.
In age of discovery when Portuguese ships apeared in Indic ocean the arab cronists caled then of Francs.
pledoux 2 years ago 2
@pledoux
Yes, and also in South-East Asia, European men are called "Farang" from the former word "Frank".
thecajuncutthroat 2 years ago
Skvělé video , 5*****
RadislawCZ 2 years ago
Nice video. 5* from me.
Emperor Alexios Comnenos gave passage to the Crusaders.The Crusaders are recorded in the Byzantine epic tale of the Alexiad.
Dourios11144 2 years ago 3
Et c'est a cause de cette guerre que plein de monde parlent encore des religions comme étant la cause des guerres.
Klaudios777 2 years ago
superbe
10001111000111011100 2 years ago
Je dois dire que je commence bien l'année sur youtube avec cette vidéo dont tu nous gratifie Cajun, texte pertinent, belles illustrations et une music prenante... T'es un AS !
iosifkiss 2 years ago 2
nice video
XavierB0126 2 years ago
GODEFROY DE BOUILLON, quel homme ! What a man !
mouna28 2 years ago 2
Toujours auusi intéressantes, vos vidéos ! Cette période est si méconnue ...
Merci .
mouna28 2 years ago
M A G N I F I Q U E
Voilà une video d'une qualité rare.
farcry69460 2 years ago 4
BOnne année 2010 ! et merci de cette vidéo cajun !
tipitjo 2 years ago
Exelent video - 5 * . Greetings from Russia.
AlexRussia007 2 years ago
Ah oui effectivement il y a bien une illustration qui ressemble fortement à celles du jeu Mount & Blades :))) Excellent ce petit jeu au passage !
Guildou 2 years ago
Tres bien realise !
Ca me fait de la peine de voir ce a quoi un pays au passe si glorieux comme la France a ete rabaisse au cours des dernieres decennies. Il est temps de redorer le blason que nous ont laisse nos ancetres.
Nickohlson 2 years ago 5
ouais bon video l'arrivé des chevaliers templiers(frère mason) dans nos société
jejeroy 2 years ago
C'étais un plaisir à regarder! Merci beaucoup pour le temps que t'as du concacrer à faire cette vidéo!
Frenchy616 2 years ago
Vive la france , bonne année 2010 ^^
GeoffreyRahl 2 years ago
spanish LEPANTO best battle
CapitanFiro 2 years ago
Great video! "Riders of doom" is a perfect choice! I almost wanted to ride and crush some heads to say the least! haha! Very well done indeed.
IgnisRepublica 2 years ago 2
Excellent video. Too often the Crusades are seen in a negative way rather than as a a long overdue counterattack by Europe.
One thing though. While the French phrase Dieu le veut is sometimes seen, usually the Crusader motto was the Latin phrase, Deus vult. Latin was seen to be the unifying language of a united Christendom rather than the local languages of French, English, German, etc.
<