@ASSHOLELA it timed it with a stop watch from a Texas mile run by SW in 2009 or 2008... he ran 240+ consecutive times.. 246mph was hi off the trailer run in 2009.. sold the car since... the best looking Supra I've ever seen.. did 1500whp all boost in Vegas in '08 with a GT55-91 turbo, which blew so it's now running ar 84mm dbb making 14xxwhp all-boost... :)
which video did you use to get 22 coz i timed one of them and 0:08 to 0:33 is 25s. which is quite slow for a heavy modded supra. Standard Bugatti veyron road and track 1 mile = 25.9s.
in comparison ,ssc ultimate aero mile = 22.5s @ 230mph.
@ASSHOLELA this supra is capable of 7 sec quarter mile runs, in the video it was spinning on slicks in second, he short-shifted as well.. he hit 246.2, on street tires he would spin in 5th, .. i though the Veyron hits not much less than 205, Supra beating it by 40mph.. the bugatti can go full throttle from the beginning, supra rolled out in 1st, short shifted into third, still has a muchhigher trap speed.. the competition here is the trap speed..
i dont think any supra is capable of 7s runs. The fastest ive seen is AMS's 1500hp 8.95s run. F1 cars run at 8.9s @ 170+mph. And the F1 has superior traction to any car, even the veyron. and 1500/hp ton. Unless it has over 2000hp, no.
@ASSHOLELA search it up.. there is even a supra in the 6's man... Ebrahim Kanoo, but the body is modified... a stripped supra that is street legal has done 7.57... full weight supra i talked about with DR's did 7.91 in 2008/9 at 189.. he ran similar times consecutively.. it had 1500 at the wheels all boost.. look at my playlists.. many supras in the 9's, 8's, and some in 7's.. 7.57 is the fastest unibody supra.. 7.91 fastest 6 speed supra 34xx lbs.. F1 cars have so much downforce
@ASSHOLELA and their downforce limits speed.. they have a drag co of over 1, while regular street cars have around .4x/.3x.. without all the downforce, with that little weight and that much power they'd spin out easily.. AMS Alpha 12 will be destroyed by this supra man, so will veyron, so will ssc.. all great cars with different purposes though, pretty interesting to compare.. yes, nowadays tuners have unbelievable speed, supras were getting into the low 9's in the early 2000's
@ASSHOLELA that's when their tuning capabilities were being explored.. there's also a full weight 6 speed viper that went 7.65 letting off close to the end.. standing mile records are now pushing over 26xmph by Americans tuners, which no supercar in the class of the veyron can come close to..
@ASSHOLELA Veyron SS required such a long multiple mile strip to hit 268 starting from approximately 70mph, this Supra only required 1 mile to hit 246 starting from 0, being capable of 250 easily, and this was with a strong crosswind.. all are great cars though, Supra being one of the most impressive tuners, Veyron being engineering excellence though the looks are kinda controversial.. ssc is a very impressive car,but it already has a tuned version of an engine,i would consider it tuned as well
@supra1722 Also what's the difference between SWs Supra and that Autobahn Supra that his 247mph. Similar turbo and engine set ups? Been curious about that for a while now.
@iPROFITDON well, SW has a 3.3 stroker, ABM has a 3.4, both turbos are the same size (91mm) SW has a HKS Dag suspension for quarter miles but had a the stock one for the mile and so did ABM.. ABM has TRD LSD.. their differences are in the small things like ECU, fuel systems, roll cages.. but SW has drag racing brakes and some other small things.. SW's car is slightly lighter, and is faster in the quarter MILE.. i think the reason ABM was slightly faster in the mile was because of less crosswind.
@iPROFITDON sorry, too many characters makes me cut it kinda short.. also, SW's Supra made 16xxwhp (not sure the source but im 90%sure).. not sure if it was all boost, but at SILV 08 it made 1500+ all boost.. ABM made 1528 with many YouTube vids one i know you've seen... SW was running 1295whp at the mile, i think he could have made 250 if he turned boost up slightly.. not sure how much ABM made with its tune at the mile, probably somewhere a tiny bit higher.. sorry i this wasn't any help...
any tuner car walks the bugatti in the trap speed due to its weight. The real determining factor i think is the mile time. Just imagine, how do people see which car is faster in real life? No they do not compare on paper trap speeds. They drag race. And in a drag race, its no use to have a +50mph trap speed even tho you finished just 1s behind your opponent. Drag races are made or broken at the start.At such HP outputs The car with the best traction is usually the winner.
I like the SSC because despite its RWD it had superior traction to beat a veyron SS in the low speeds. According to GPS results, only the 0-60mph was slower. 0-100 and anything onwards was significantly faster. this results in it producing not only a very quick trap but a very quick overall time 22.5 @ 230mph. in fact, i think its the quickest of the wheel powered mile times on youtube, faster than the supra, the ppr and the UR lambo, even tho these have 20mph faster traps.
people talk of the Agera R owning the Veyron SS solely based on trap speeds alone, but in reality, the agera couldnt really catch up with the SS distance wise until up to the mile.
@ASSHOLELA unless it was a 601 roll race.. that's why i do not judge a car's overall performance just from a dig, because they don't show the car's top end, it only shows how good the traction is to get off the line, and that's where the Veyron has the advantage- but these cars were built for top speed, not for off-the-line racing.. what matters in this class to me is trap speeds, and that represents which car will actually pass later and win a long-distance race..
@ASSHOLELA a roll race will be better, having higher speeds and not caring about traction as much, it will show the potential of a car better than a dig race.. SS and Supra on slicks 60mph roll.. veyron would get ahead, and then Supra would massacre it.. both great cars, but it would come out on top. supra's drag co is .31, Veyron is .41 or something around there.. veyron's weight is a handicap, but part of it is electronic aids which Supra doesn't have to control torque to each wheel etc.
@supra1722 I think 22 seconds is a bit optimistic. PPR ran 0-410kph in 23 digging much harder than SW's beast did. Even URs Gallardo didn't run the mile in 22 seconds.
@iPROFITDON yes, you are correct, my mistake, the othe guy also ppointed out, it was 25 secs, thanks for the correction, and i didn't actually care to look at the video's time, i actually took out a stop watch to record the time.. btw UR's record is still at 250 isn't it?
@supra1722 Yep, I don't think any UR customers are really inclined to try for that record after Richard's little mishap the event after he set that record lol. Never seen a Supra go airborne before.
Bugatti Veyron has only the speed record because Volkswagen is the owner of the best top speed track in the world ... They don't allow cars like SSC doing their top speeds there, otherwise the SSC WOULD surpass the Veyron SS, it reached the 400km/h faster than the Veyron SS and it was not even in a 9km(lol not even close to 9 km ...) flat straight ...
you are right but another reason would be that the competitors are reluctant to find other suitable topspeed grounds themselves. I respect SSC in this aspect coz they are the only company who did try the record in suboptimal locations . Henessey, Koenigsegg meanwhile, continue to yap that there isnt enough space anywhere.
But there is. SSC did 400kmh in less than 3.5km. Even the veyron doesnt need 9km. at 50s 0-400kmh, it only needs 5.5km
@grimm6jack let me remind you that the Veyron has all the luxury materials you can imagine in it AND weighs over 2.000 kg's... yet still has the power and torque to get all the way up to 431kph... the SSC however, only has like a bare chasis with a huuuuge ass V8 with (what was it? twinturbo? or twinsupercharged?) a lot of torque for its displacement...
@weetnietgeen let me remind you that weight has little to do with overall top speed. Look at the distance and time it takes for the two to accelerate to 200mph, it's not even a comparison. The Veyron gets beat into the ground.
Huge ass V8? It's a 6.3L twin turbo v8 against a 8L quad turbo w16.
@iPROFITDON and yet weight has to do with everything... i can assure you that if the engine of the Bugatti were to be placed in side the SSC Aero and changed the gear ratio's a bit, it could easily do 450+ maybe even 500kph... but it couldnt because at those speeds the car would just shatter apart...
the power it takes to keep accelerating such mass is just too damn high... :)
@weetnietgeen Yes because putting a heavier similarly powered engine in the SSC would make it go faster? If that's true you just proved my point. You get it, mass affects acceleration, not top speed.
@iPROFITDON well, you dont really understand the concept of ''acceleration'' and ''topspeed'' now do you? to get to 431kph it still needs to ''accelerate'' even if its 1mile / hour faster... its still accelerating... and the resistance together with the mass of the vehicle is terribly high which keeps it from accelerating any further
top speed is just the point where one cannot accelerate any further due to restistance/weight ratio
@weetnietgeen You're correct, it does need to "accelerate" at those high speed. Accelerating at 431kph is an aerodynamic achievement. The resistance you're talking about isn't the weight of the car holding it back but air resistance that keeps it from accelerating any further.
Weight is one of the factors that helps the Veyron get murdered in acceleration say to a mile. But running for say 10 miles, tires, aero, gearing, etc has more to do with over all top speed than weight.
@grimm6jack the ssc did the 256mph just because it ran on racing fuel which gave MUCH more power... with normal fuel it ran just 238mph^^ just saying...
and even if it would be faster it wouldn't be the better car, the burmester sound system of the veyron ALONE is about as expensive as the whole interior of the ssc^^
@CrimnlBT SSC's run was verified by Guinness. Guinness does not allow racing fuel in these runs. The Veyron is a party piece for the rich, the SSC is the ultimate performance car for the rich.
@iPROFITDON ultimate performance? traction problems, oversteering, turboholes... 1,2g lateral acceleration while the veyron ss does 1,5g and the aventador >1,6g... not that excellent for corners^^
and plz give me the source that guinness does not allow higher octane fuel^^
@iPROFITDON i can't send links via youtube...just look up on google^^ there are simply so many other things you have to consider than just power to weight ratio e.g. the suspension (pushrod in aventador e.g.), the tires, the weight partition, the computer technique behind it (best example aventador and nissan gtr).
the ssc is powerful, yes, but not well engineered (btw front looks like a ford focus, side like a lambo diablo and back like ultima gtr >_>)
@CrimnlBT - among other things. Thing is 99% of them aren't driven hard. Where do you see an Aero breaking down? I've never seen a single one have a problem.
You're saying the SSC isn't well engineered? A car this fast can't help but be well engineered. It's a modern day Mclaren F1.
@iPROFITDON let's see... about 350 veyrons are built by now and i saw at least 30 on youtube alone being driven by private drivers with camera or test magazines ... don't really think that's all^^
y do you think the veyron is so expensive?^^ it has the most expensive and most enduring parts put together combined with huge luxury, the sound system alone is as expensive as a ferrari... no car can let you drive 400+ with such an ease^^
@CrimnlBT Oh I know why it's so expensive, one it's a Bugatti, and two it's the most extreme piece of over engineering excellence ever. I never said the UA or anything was a better car, because it's not, it's just faster and much more brutal. That brutality is what I like. There is no other car that can cruise as such high speeds as easily as the Veyron IMO.
@iPROFITDON btw anyone can build fast cars^^ for example the "turbogockel" which is a golf 2 with over 950hp EATING veyrons, koenigseggs and aeros on the 1/4 mile (9.39 @ 165mph), the art consists in building a reliable car while having such a huge amount of power, and thats where the veyron is excellent at... no veyron from 2005 til now had to be in a repair shop because they just dont break down... from the 6 sold cars called ultimate aero already 2 broke down... not really reliable^^
@CrimnlBT I tried and found nothing of the Veyron and LP700 pulling 1.6G on a skid pad lol. Actually the last test I read the LP700 pulled 1.05G on the skid pad, I don't think you know what you're talking about. x}
It's rather easy now days to build a car that will beat the fastest production cars in the 1/4 mile. Running a 9.3 is worlds different than running 260mph.
You're wrong, ask M5boards, drag times and such, a few have had transmission problems sheering gears when driven hard -
@iPROFITDON using google right is art for itself it seems >_>
it's not hard to build a car going 250mph+ (btw normally i use kmh^^) just put a v8 tt in a long transmission and build in a clutch which has enough endurance and a chassis with enough aerodynamics... that's why the ssc wont go faster around corners than a gtr, aventador or mp4-12 because it has almost no downforce at all, even the veyron has MUCH more downforce...
@grimm6jack, veyron topspeed has been tested in japan and also in US so saying that VW owns the only place where ist possible etc. is just convenient bitching. Also Veyron SS doesn't need 9km distance but only 4,7km to reach its topspeed.
if you guys really want to see own, check out SSC's GPS vid vs this veyron SS. only the 0-60mph is slower. After that, the SSC is ahead by 100mph, and then gains 20m every second! by 350kmh, the SSC is already 150m+ ahead!
by 1km and 328kmh for the agera, the veyron SS was still a whopping 38m ahead.
So you can say that in standard drag races of 400m, 1km or even one mile, the Agera wont beat the SS. The only way would be in 2 mile++ topspeed races, but it remains to be seen whether the Agera can top 431kmh in the first place.
.1-The time that a normal Vayron does 0-200MPH is 24 sec . While .Agera R does 0-200-0 MPH in 24 sec! . .2-The time that Veyron SS does 0-200MPH is 22 sec . While .Agera R does that in 17 sec! . . .Man up people. don't use Vayron as a come back cuz it sucks dick. soon GTBOARD will .make a SS race a Agera R and all of you will Agera R as a come back! . . .Koenigsegg = WINS .Bugatti = Losses
1-The time that a normal Vayron does 0-200MPH is 24 sec While
Agera R does 0-200-0 MPH in 24 sec!
2-The time that Veyron SS does 0-200MPH is 22 sec While
Agera R does that in 17 sec!
Man up people. don't use Vayron as a come back cuz it sucks dick. soon GTBOARD will make a SS race a Agera R and all of you will Agera R as a come back!
check out my channel to see me take a test drive and speed test in the bugatti theres 2 vids to watch i hope you all enjoy them thanks for your time.
McLaren was developed on top gear's test track, it's designed to be fast on that track in mind, I'm sure they were willing to adjust anything to be #1 on that chart, so I can see that. Plus it's a short track, and lots of corners where mclaren's lower weight helped it. But both are great cars in the end.
I wouldnt say it wasnt true, different tests are done in different conditions. The McLaren F1 Xp5 driven by pro driver Andy Wallace on ehra lessein accelerated at the same rate to 240kmh and was faster to 200mph than a standard bugatti veyron driven by amateur driver (dubai guy) (see my mclaren f1 xp5 vs bugatti veyron acceleration comparison). Statistics of the mclaren f1 by autocar was given by journalists, amatuer drivers and the lot, and may not be the fastest possible.
@ASSHOLELA yes, ur totally right... its just that the guy that i commented on said: this is the proove the race on top gear is not good. and i said yes bugatti < mclaren. (conclusion is i actualy wanted to say they fucked something up in bugatti) srry for english :)
Nice you flagged my comment as spam because I said the truth.
Now I see that I know about cars much more than you.
Super SPort does 0-300 in 14.6 seconds
and 0-200km\h in 6.7
It will rape any competitors without any trouble. Not to mention that the SUper Sport is much more stable to drive than the koenigsegg,SSC or henessey.
@Xjiei1 Oh wow you are so wrong. The Venom GT is much faster. But hey don't take my word for it. Go watch the video of it doing 70-220mph in 16 seconds. It takes this well, at 3 second mark it's doing about 70mph and at 22 seconds it's doing about 200mph. Thats 19 seconds to get from 70 to 200mph 3 seconds slower and 20mph slower than the Venom GT. Again before you talk shit back go watch the video.
@Xjiei1 we are talking straight stock but if you put a 1500hp GTR 2012 into the mix it will beat this SuperSport around any track if the tire compounds r the same
@Xjiei1 just see how Agera R kicks Vayron SS's ass in this video:
/watch?v=z-xd7DJEBC8&feature=related
BTW Stop loving Veyron! it's ugly and only for straight runs! it can't turn for shit with 2 ton weight and acceleration after 300 is slower than a CBR125
SeventhArt's direct speed comparisons can be quite misleading. I have the same comparison, but also calculated the distance travelled.
It turned out that it was the SS that kicked the Agera R's Ass. From a standing start, the SS pulled ahead of the Agera by as much as 58m (15 car lengths, utter ownage!) before the R started reeling in, but it never caught up in the end!
The SS 1/4ed in 9.9s, agera 10.7s. 0.8s diff. Thats the same margin a base veyron beat a mc f1 (10.3 vs 11.1)
@Xjiei1 idd most people think this is an overpriced car but the fact is that this is by far the most reliable and safest fast car there is for extremly high speeds
SSC's Ultimate Aero runs a 0-300km/h in 12.8 seconds. None of the other Hypercars/Supercars out there are in the same league. Can't wait to see what the Tuatara will do.
2.9s, 14.53s, 17.68s are both claims. I never seen a test achieve those figures. The m5board test is 3.8s, 15.5, 18.0s. So agera only beat the SS 0-300kmh and 0-322kmh. And claim wise, bugatti veyron SS 2.46s, 14.4s,0-322kmh 16ish -s.
@ASSHOLELA The Agere R was faster from 0-0-300km and 322km and the video I saw the Agere has a lot more acceleration than the SS and probably will go faster 0-400km
and estimated speed of 440km / h that the Agere will have to prove R
you are absoluetly right. in fact, james may's test 0-200mph ~16.4s. he was using topspeed mode, which dramatically increases the topend accel. It lowers about 15% of the total drag, from 0.42 to 0.36.Autocar wasn't. you can see estimations of the 210-xkmh to 400kmh accel in my James May Veyron SuperSport Topspeed Run Analysis, or the 0-xkmh (to 330kmh) run from another test run in "Koenigsegg Agera R vs SSC Ultimate Aero vs Bugatti Veyron SuperSPort acceleration comparison".
@ASSHOLELA yea you are right, 300bruninho is incorrect because if you look at the Guiness Book of World Records 2012, it states the veyron ss world record edition as the fastest. just check the Guiness Book of World records site.
@ASSHOLELA Veyron SS 440km? loooool the speedo doesn't even show more than 430 km how come that fat ass can get to 440? the Wiki doesn't say 440km either! it says 431km
the passenger model of the veyron SS was never made to achive 430kmh. They are limited to 414kmh. So thats why they limit the guage to show only 430kmh.
@ASSHOLELA actually they tested the agera r to 273. something mph, thats what they said anyway but did yuo see the ssc 0-200 mph run, 6 runs all under 16 seconds to 200, ssc all the way my friend
@KOSKESH43 The veyron runs out of track before reaching 440 km/h, this is the most stable car ever made with the Mclaren F1, that why the Veyron is heavy.
And people Koenigsegg are better and faster but i've never seen a video that prove this...
The Veyron SS record is now 1,5 years old a no other production car have beat that and the only car that come close is the ultimate aero.
@edtk99 But everyone knows that the aero is unstable at thoses speeds and make terrible noise when the veyron is quiet and keeps passengers in luxury.
Bugatti said that they will continue realeasing fester cars if someone does a faster car than the Veyron SS.
btw I think that Mclaren should made a new version of the mclaren F1.
FYI, The standard Veyron is actually faster than Ultimate Aero. It (Body #501) did reach 417 km/h without speed limiter before being limited to 408 km/h, that information is confirmed by Cars and Driver and National Geographic.
@11Kanal11 Veyon SS 0-300 km / h = 16.7 seconds you friend is wrong in this guineesss 16.7 sec 0-300km, you guys can not admit that the car was rather vcs 2 sec slower than the R Agera
@300bruninho dude look at the official page of bugatti there u can see the official number 0-300 = 14,6s ... idk whats with this car / driver in this video but as I said, the official number is 14,6s. thats what matters for me.
@11Kanal11 then it is wrong in this guiness 16.7 sec and all Web sites as well, even when the Venom GT which made 14.1 sec 0-300km in the video was the Veyron 16.7 sec SS which means it does not do so unless the SS Veyron is too heavy
@300bruninho dude I think u talking about the veyron!!! but I talk about the veyron SS ... do some reseach! veyron is 0-300 16,7s but veyron SS (super sport) is 0-300 14,6s. : )
@11Kanal11 you friend is defending the Veyron SS like crazy, I'm talking about the SS to see the videos ask anyone here who has a 0-300km / h is 16.7 s does nothing to change this reality
@300bruninho the veyron has got bout 432 km/h tested guiness speed, it could be faster, if the road is longer.. then it'd reach 440.. the koenigsegg CAN'T reach more, douche!
@TheFlashProject011 They should go to salt lake and see what speed they can reach (the old veyron reach 415 km/h @ salt lake) but they had a problem the machine who test the tires can't simulate speeds higher than 435 km/h
@edtk99 and the koenigsegg Agera R is just able to reach 375 km/h.. and the bugatti veyron ss 415 km/h.. but the koenigsegg goes with biofuel, so it's better for the nature..
and the veyron SS did 434km/h, it's better than 415km/h :D
what do we care about nature ? if i watch that, i don't think to nature ... (about 30% of CO2 with cars, bikes, fly etc ..; and why don't we try to reduce the other 70% ????)
@TheFlashProject011 the agera is a good evolution for automotive but they forget that the production of bio fuel can be more harmfull for the planet then normal fuel production :/
@prosurfer2222 koenisegg, ssc....all stupid car...the real car are other like ferrari f40, lamborghini miura, bmw m1, lancia delta s4...but not bugatti
@emomerda89 what you are saying makes no sense.....how about the mclaren f1....f430, 360 modena....shut up asshole and stop hating on this car just cuz its the fastest
@prosurfer2222 i hate this car because in only publicity....v16 8000cc wow amazing..lancia delta s4 in 1986 with a 2000cc 800cv in asphalt cofiguration, like audi and other.....bugatti shit nly ferrari lancia alfa romeo lamborghini mercedes bmv audi....
Million $ car but a potatoe as camera. Seems legit.
TheLaimer 1 week ago
@TheLaimer
i enlargeds the video. the original video was a small frame at the side. So the resolution suffers.
ANyway, autocar only test drove the veyron SS. they dont own one.
ASSHOLELA 6 days ago
@ASSHOLELA
Sorry, didn't know that. :)
TheLaimer 6 days ago
The Veyron is by far the better car, however it's way to expensive, for me that is.
SSC is faster.
grimm6jack 2 weeks ago
boost logic supra 0-394kph spinning in 1st and 2nd in 22secs 1295rwhp... just saying..
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722
where is source?
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA it timed it with a stop watch from a Texas mile run by SW in 2009 or 2008... he ran 240+ consecutive times.. 246mph was hi off the trailer run in 2009.. sold the car since... the best looking Supra I've ever seen.. did 1500whp all boost in Vegas in '08 with a GT55-91 turbo, which blew so it's now running ar 84mm dbb making 14xxwhp all-boost... :)
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722
which video did you use to get 22 coz i timed one of them and 0:08 to 0:33 is 25s. which is quite slow for a heavy modded supra. Standard Bugatti veyron road and track 1 mile = 25.9s.
in comparison ,ssc ultimate aero mile = 22.5s @ 230mph.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA this supra is capable of 7 sec quarter mile runs, in the video it was spinning on slicks in second, he short-shifted as well.. he hit 246.2, on street tires he would spin in 5th, .. i though the Veyron hits not much less than 205, Supra beating it by 40mph.. the bugatti can go full throttle from the beginning, supra rolled out in 1st, short shifted into third, still has a muchhigher trap speed.. the competition here is the trap speed..
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722
i dont think any supra is capable of 7s runs. The fastest ive seen is AMS's 1500hp 8.95s run. F1 cars run at 8.9s @ 170+mph. And the F1 has superior traction to any car, even the veyron. and 1500/hp ton. Unless it has over 2000hp, no.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA search it up.. there is even a supra in the 6's man... Ebrahim Kanoo, but the body is modified... a stripped supra that is street legal has done 7.57... full weight supra i talked about with DR's did 7.91 in 2008/9 at 189.. he ran similar times consecutively.. it had 1500 at the wheels all boost.. look at my playlists.. many supras in the 9's, 8's, and some in 7's.. 7.57 is the fastest unibody supra.. 7.91 fastest 6 speed supra 34xx lbs.. F1 cars have so much downforce
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA and their downforce limits speed.. they have a drag co of over 1, while regular street cars have around .4x/.3x.. without all the downforce, with that little weight and that much power they'd spin out easily.. AMS Alpha 12 will be destroyed by this supra man, so will veyron, so will ssc.. all great cars with different purposes though, pretty interesting to compare.. yes, nowadays tuners have unbelievable speed, supras were getting into the low 9's in the early 2000's
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA that's when their tuning capabilities were being explored.. there's also a full weight 6 speed viper that went 7.65 letting off close to the end.. standing mile records are now pushing over 26xmph by Americans tuners, which no supercar in the class of the veyron can come close to..
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA Veyron SS required such a long multiple mile strip to hit 268 starting from approximately 70mph, this Supra only required 1 mile to hit 246 starting from 0, being capable of 250 easily, and this was with a strong crosswind.. all are great cars though, Supra being one of the most impressive tuners, Veyron being engineering excellence though the looks are kinda controversial.. ssc is a very impressive car,but it already has a tuned version of an engine,i would consider it tuned as well
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722 Also what's the difference between SWs Supra and that Autobahn Supra that his 247mph. Similar turbo and engine set ups? Been curious about that for a while now.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON well, SW has a 3.3 stroker, ABM has a 3.4, both turbos are the same size (91mm) SW has a HKS Dag suspension for quarter miles but had a the stock one for the mile and so did ABM.. ABM has TRD LSD.. their differences are in the small things like ECU, fuel systems, roll cages.. but SW has drag racing brakes and some other small things.. SW's car is slightly lighter, and is faster in the quarter MILE.. i think the reason ABM was slightly faster in the mile was because of less crosswind.
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722 That's just what I wanted to know, just basic stuff like displacement, turbo size n all. Thanks! :}
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON sure np man :)
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON sorry, too many characters makes me cut it kinda short.. also, SW's Supra made 16xxwhp (not sure the source but im 90%sure).. not sure if it was all boost, but at SILV 08 it made 1500+ all boost.. ABM made 1528 with many YouTube vids one i know you've seen... SW was running 1295whp at the mile, i think he could have made 250 if he turned boost up slightly.. not sure how much ABM made with its tune at the mile, probably somewhere a tiny bit higher.. sorry i this wasn't any help...
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722
any tuner car walks the bugatti in the trap speed due to its weight. The real determining factor i think is the mile time. Just imagine, how do people see which car is faster in real life? No they do not compare on paper trap speeds. They drag race. And in a drag race, its no use to have a +50mph trap speed even tho you finished just 1s behind your opponent. Drag races are made or broken at the start.At such HP outputs The car with the best traction is usually the winner.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
I like the SSC because despite its RWD it had superior traction to beat a veyron SS in the low speeds. According to GPS results, only the 0-60mph was slower. 0-100 and anything onwards was significantly faster. this results in it producing not only a very quick trap but a very quick overall time 22.5 @ 230mph. in fact, i think its the quickest of the wheel powered mile times on youtube, faster than the supra, the ppr and the UR lambo, even tho these have 20mph faster traps.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
people talk of the Agera R owning the Veyron SS solely based on trap speeds alone, but in reality, the agera couldnt really catch up with the SS distance wise until up to the mile.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA unless it was a 601 roll race.. that's why i do not judge a car's overall performance just from a dig, because they don't show the car's top end, it only shows how good the traction is to get off the line, and that's where the Veyron has the advantage- but these cars were built for top speed, not for off-the-line racing.. what matters in this class to me is trap speeds, and that represents which car will actually pass later and win a long-distance race..
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@ASSHOLELA a roll race will be better, having higher speeds and not caring about traction as much, it will show the potential of a car better than a dig race.. SS and Supra on slicks 60mph roll.. veyron would get ahead, and then Supra would massacre it.. both great cars, but it would come out on top. supra's drag co is .31, Veyron is .41 or something around there.. veyron's weight is a handicap, but part of it is electronic aids which Supra doesn't have to control torque to each wheel etc.
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722 I think 22 seconds is a bit optimistic. PPR ran 0-410kph in 23 digging much harder than SW's beast did. Even URs Gallardo didn't run the mile in 22 seconds.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON yes, you are correct, my mistake, the othe guy also ppointed out, it was 25 secs, thanks for the correction, and i didn't actually care to look at the video's time, i actually took out a stop watch to record the time.. btw UR's record is still at 250 isn't it?
supra1722 2 weeks ago
@supra1722 Yep, I don't think any UR customers are really inclined to try for that record after Richard's little mishap the event after he set that record lol. Never seen a Supra go airborne before.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
Bugatti Veyron has only the speed record because Volkswagen is the owner of the best top speed track in the world ... They don't allow cars like SSC doing their top speeds there, otherwise the SSC WOULD surpass the Veyron SS, it reached the 400km/h faster than the Veyron SS and it was not even in a 9km(lol not even close to 9 km ...) flat straight ...
grimm6jack 2 weeks ago
@grimm6jack
you are right but another reason would be that the competitors are reluctant to find other suitable topspeed grounds themselves. I respect SSC in this aspect coz they are the only company who did try the record in suboptimal locations . Henessey, Koenigsegg meanwhile, continue to yap that there isnt enough space anywhere.
But there is. SSC did 400kmh in less than 3.5km. Even the veyron doesnt need 9km. at 50s 0-400kmh, it only needs 5.5km
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@grimm6jack They can try salt lake like bugatti does.
edtk99 2 weeks ago
@grimm6jack let me remind you that the Veyron has all the luxury materials you can imagine in it AND weighs over 2.000 kg's... yet still has the power and torque to get all the way up to 431kph... the SSC however, only has like a bare chasis with a huuuuge ass V8 with (what was it? twinturbo? or twinsupercharged?) a lot of torque for its displacement...
weetnietgeen 2 weeks ago
@weetnietgeen let me remind you that weight has little to do with overall top speed. Look at the distance and time it takes for the two to accelerate to 200mph, it's not even a comparison. The Veyron gets beat into the ground.
Huge ass V8? It's a 6.3L twin turbo v8 against a 8L quad turbo w16.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON and yet weight has to do with everything... i can assure you that if the engine of the Bugatti were to be placed in side the SSC Aero and changed the gear ratio's a bit, it could easily do 450+ maybe even 500kph... but it couldnt because at those speeds the car would just shatter apart...
the power it takes to keep accelerating such mass is just too damn high... :)
weetnietgeen 2 weeks ago
@weetnietgeen Yes because putting a heavier similarly powered engine in the SSC would make it go faster? If that's true you just proved my point. You get it, mass affects acceleration, not top speed.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON well, you dont really understand the concept of ''acceleration'' and ''topspeed'' now do you? to get to 431kph it still needs to ''accelerate'' even if its 1mile / hour faster... its still accelerating... and the resistance together with the mass of the vehicle is terribly high which keeps it from accelerating any further
top speed is just the point where one cannot accelerate any further due to restistance/weight ratio
weetnietgeen 2 weeks ago
@weetnietgeen You're correct, it does need to "accelerate" at those high speed. Accelerating at 431kph is an aerodynamic achievement. The resistance you're talking about isn't the weight of the car holding it back but air resistance that keeps it from accelerating any further.
Weight is one of the factors that helps the Veyron get murdered in acceleration say to a mile. But running for say 10 miles, tires, aero, gearing, etc has more to do with over all top speed than weight.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@grimm6jack the ssc did the 256mph just because it ran on racing fuel which gave MUCH more power... with normal fuel it ran just 238mph^^ just saying...
and even if it would be faster it wouldn't be the better car, the burmester sound system of the veyron ALONE is about as expensive as the whole interior of the ssc^^
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@CrimnlBT SSC's run was verified by Guinness. Guinness does not allow racing fuel in these runs. The Veyron is a party piece for the rich, the SSC is the ultimate performance car for the rich.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON ultimate performance? traction problems, oversteering, turboholes... 1,2g lateral acceleration while the veyron ss does 1,5g and the aventador >1,6g... not that excellent for corners^^
and plz give me the source that guinness does not allow higher octane fuel^^
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@CrimnlBT Thought that was just common knowledge. Production car records cannot be run on race gas.
Where are you getting these G readings? I'd love to see a Veyron or Aventador hold 1.5gs on a skidpad lol.
In my eyes, yes, ultimate performance. Speed talks :}. Anyone can build a car to the Veyron SS' standards given the same budget and 2 mil price tag.
The fact that the UA, for a fraction of the price, quite literally walks away from it is amazing.
Is it a better car than the Veyron? No.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON i can't send links via youtube...just look up on google^^ there are simply so many other things you have to consider than just power to weight ratio e.g. the suspension (pushrod in aventador e.g.), the tires, the weight partition, the computer technique behind it (best example aventador and nissan gtr).
the ssc is powerful, yes, but not well engineered (btw front looks like a ford focus, side like a lambo diablo and back like ultima gtr >_>)
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@CrimnlBT - among other things. Thing is 99% of them aren't driven hard. Where do you see an Aero breaking down? I've never seen a single one have a problem.
You're saying the SSC isn't well engineered? A car this fast can't help but be well engineered. It's a modern day Mclaren F1.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON let's see... about 350 veyrons are built by now and i saw at least 30 on youtube alone being driven by private drivers with camera or test magazines ... don't really think that's all^^
y do you think the veyron is so expensive?^^ it has the most expensive and most enduring parts put together combined with huge luxury, the sound system alone is as expensive as a ferrari... no car can let you drive 400+ with such an ease^^
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@CrimnlBT Oh I know why it's so expensive, one it's a Bugatti, and two it's the most extreme piece of over engineering excellence ever. I never said the UA or anything was a better car, because it's not, it's just faster and much more brutal. That brutality is what I like. There is no other car that can cruise as such high speeds as easily as the Veyron IMO.
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON btw anyone can build fast cars^^ for example the "turbogockel" which is a golf 2 with over 950hp EATING veyrons, koenigseggs and aeros on the 1/4 mile (9.39 @ 165mph), the art consists in building a reliable car while having such a huge amount of power, and thats where the veyron is excellent at... no veyron from 2005 til now had to be in a repair shop because they just dont break down... from the 6 sold cars called ultimate aero already 2 broke down... not really reliable^^
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@CrimnlBT I tried and found nothing of the Veyron and LP700 pulling 1.6G on a skid pad lol. Actually the last test I read the LP700 pulled 1.05G on the skid pad, I don't think you know what you're talking about. x}
It's rather easy now days to build a car that will beat the fastest production cars in the 1/4 mile. Running a 9.3 is worlds different than running 260mph.
You're wrong, ask M5boards, drag times and such, a few have had transmission problems sheering gears when driven hard -
iPROFITDON 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON using google right is art for itself it seems >_>
it's not hard to build a car going 250mph+ (btw normally i use kmh^^) just put a v8 tt in a long transmission and build in a clutch which has enough endurance and a chassis with enough aerodynamics... that's why the ssc wont go faster around corners than a gtr, aventador or mp4-12 because it has almost no downforce at all, even the veyron has MUCH more downforce...
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@iPROFITDON ah ok then that's another thing xD
FUN FACTOR! xD
CrimnlBT 2 weeks ago
@grimm6jack, veyron topspeed has been tested in japan and also in US so saying that VW owns the only place where ist possible etc. is just convenient bitching. Also Veyron SS doesn't need 9km distance but only 4,7km to reach its topspeed.
brudel001 7 hours ago
if you guys really want to see own, check out SSC's GPS vid vs this veyron SS. only the 0-60mph is slower. After that, the SSC is ahead by 100mph, and then gains 20m every second! by 350kmh, the SSC is already 150m+ ahead!
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
by 1km and 328kmh for the agera, the veyron SS was still a whopping 38m ahead.
So you can say that in standard drag races of 400m, 1km or even one mile, the Agera wont beat the SS. The only way would be in 2 mile++ topspeed races, but it remains to be seen whether the Agera can top 431kmh in the first place.
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KOSKESH43 1 month ago
1-The time that a normal Vayron does 0-200MPH is 24 sec While
Agera R does 0-200-0 MPH in 24 sec!
2-The time that Veyron SS does 0-200MPH is 22 sec While
Agera R does that in 17 sec!
Man up people. don't use Vayron as a come back cuz it sucks dick. soon GTBOARD will make a SS race a Agera R and all of you will Agera R as a come back!
Koenigsegg = WINS
Bugatti = Losses
KOSKESH43 1 month ago
hey,please tell me the handling of bugatti veyron supersport(percentage)(give me reply here)
akay611 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my channel to see me take a test drive and speed test in the bugatti theres 2 vids to watch i hope you all enjoy them thanks for your time.
wokoandlawz 1 month ago
McLaren was developed on top gear's test track, it's designed to be fast on that track in mind, I'm sure they were willing to adjust anything to be #1 on that chart, so I can see that. Plus it's a short track, and lots of corners where mclaren's lower weight helped it. But both are great cars in the end.
sszhao11 1 month ago
watch?v=6C1sA3bjwiA
Bugatti Veyron Supersport
0-60mph (0-96.54km/h) 2.52 seconds
0-100mph(0-160.9km/h) 4.9 seconds
1/4 mile 145.8mph(234.59km/h) 9.9 seconds
0-160mph(0-257.44km/h) 12.2 seconds
SuperThe86 2 months ago
That speedometer moves as fast as my cars rpm gauge moves. And my car isn't slow by any means
maxshuty 2 months ago
wtf my bike is slower
BallsOfSteelRulez 2 months ago
ok thats scary. i think i am scarred now
mummafier 3 months ago
this is how you know that Top Gear McLaren vs. Bugatti test wasn't true
DANGJOS 3 months ago 10
@DANGJOS
I wouldnt say it wasnt true, different tests are done in different conditions. The McLaren F1 Xp5 driven by pro driver Andy Wallace on ehra lessein accelerated at the same rate to 240kmh and was faster to 200mph than a standard bugatti veyron driven by amateur driver (dubai guy) (see my mclaren f1 xp5 vs bugatti veyron acceleration comparison). Statistics of the mclaren f1 by autocar was given by journalists, amatuer drivers and the lot, and may not be the fastest possible.
ASSHOLELA 3 months ago
@DANGJOS they didn't use launch control, they just threw a curveball in the race to make it more interesting lol
DocHavoc0512 2 months ago
@DANGJOS yeh that was not correct unless you fail extremely a mclaren wont go faster from 0-60
TheDecidingBullet 1 month ago
@TheDecidingBullet
it isnt a matter of the mclaren going faster 0-60 than 2.5s, but the veyron going slower than 3.2s because it was not launched properly.
If you look at Dubai guy's youtube speedo the 0-60 is 3.5s, with a poor launch with no LC.
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@ASSHOLELA yes, ur totally right... its just that the guy that i commented on said: this is the proove the race on top gear is not good. and i said yes bugatti < mclaren. (conclusion is i actualy wanted to say they fucked something up in bugatti) srry for english :)
TheDecidingBullet 1 month ago
Comment removed
thunder90pl 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DANGJOS bugatti is designed for speed, not cornering. mclaren has better handling
thunder90pl 1 month ago
@DANGJOS they used a normal Veyron 16.4 for that McLaren vs Bugatti test... this one is the Super Sport with 1200 hp...
weetnietgeen 2 weeks ago
That juste the best.
Revolv1Of2My3Dream 4 months ago
Nice you flagged my comment as spam because I said the truth.
Now I see that I know about cars much more than you.
Super SPort does 0-300 in 14.6 seconds
and 0-200km\h in 6.7
It will rape any competitors without any trouble. Not to mention that the SUper Sport is much more stable to drive than the koenigsegg,SSC or henessey.
Xjiei1 4 months ago 20
@Xjiei1
I dont flag spam because I respect people's freedom of comment. I ONLY REPLY to comments which I think are wrong.
Cheers.
ASSHOLELA 4 months ago
@Xjiei1 yeah like you know how stable the car is compared to the other cars. The Bugatti is ugly as shit!! GROSS!! CCX is a MUCH nicer looking.
13tomabram 3 months ago
@13tomabram shut up, bugatti is the best
akay611 1 month ago
@akay611 Nope sorry but volkswagon is NOT even close to the best. Sorry you fail.
13tommy1 1 month ago
@Xjiei1 Oh wow you are so wrong. The Venom GT is much faster. But hey don't take my word for it. Go watch the video of it doing 70-220mph in 16 seconds. It takes this well, at 3 second mark it's doing about 70mph and at 22 seconds it's doing about 200mph. Thats 19 seconds to get from 70 to 200mph 3 seconds slower and 20mph slower than the Venom GT. Again before you talk shit back go watch the video.
DwnNvr 2 months ago
@Xjiei1 we are talking straight stock but if you put a 1500hp GTR 2012 into the mix it will beat this SuperSport around any track if the tire compounds r the same
AntDX316 1 month ago
@Xjiei1 just see how Agera R kicks Vayron SS's ass in this video:
/watch?v=z-xd7DJEBC8&feature=related
BTW Stop loving Veyron! it's ugly and only for straight runs! it can't turn for shit with 2 ton weight and acceleration after 300 is slower than a CBR125
KOSKESH43 1 month ago
SeventhArt's direct speed comparisons can be quite misleading. I have the same comparison, but also calculated the distance travelled.
It turned out that it was the SS that kicked the Agera R's Ass. From a standing start, the SS pulled ahead of the Agera by as much as 58m (15 car lengths, utter ownage!) before the R started reeling in, but it never caught up in the end!
The SS 1/4ed in 9.9s, agera 10.7s. 0.8s diff. Thats the same margin a base veyron beat a mc f1 (10.3 vs 11.1)
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@Xjiei1 idd most people think this is an overpriced car but the fact is that this is by far the most reliable and safest fast car there is for extremly high speeds
aronvdberg 3 weeks ago
SSC's Ultimate Aero runs a 0-300km/h in 12.8 seconds. None of the other Hypercars/Supercars out there are in the same league. Can't wait to see what the Tuatara will do.
he98fly 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This test were made by Autocar.co.uk,
and I dunno what the guys at Autocar.co.uk smoke, but they tested the super sport wrong!
Its real resul 0-200mph (320km\h )is around 15-16 seconds.
ON Bugattis official website it says 0-186mph (300km\h ) in 14.6sec
Do you really think that it need 8 more seconds to accelerate another 14mph?
If you dont belieave mem go and check out Bugatti's official website. I trust em much more...
bugatti.com/en/super-sport/technology.html
Xjiei1 4 months ago
koenigsegg
agera R is faster than that
DIINj27 5 months ago
brabus tkr 0-100 1.6 secs beat all of the cars
Neee35 5 months ago
@Neee35
Barabus TKR!!!!!!!!
Freimopp777 5 months ago
@Freimopp777 oops i mean Barabus the barabus and the Koenigsegg agera R are the fastest car of the world
Neee35 5 months ago
i can afford a real bugatti veyron , i would have bought one , if the were selling it for free!
qamar17121 5 months ago
here is the truth:fastestlaps . com
salonicaaaa 5 months ago
fastestlaps
salonicaaaa 5 months ago
0-100km / h Koenigsegg Agera R>> 2.9 sec
0-200km / h Koenigsegg Agera R>> 7.5 sec
0-300km / h Koenigsegg Agera R>> 14.53 sec
0-322km / h Koenigsegg Agera R>> 17.68 sec
====================================
0-100km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 2.5 sec
0-200km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 6.9 sec
0-300km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 17.1 sec
0-322km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 21.2 sec
Koenigsegg Agera R 6 broke new records, so the Guinness approved it will be the New World's Fastest
300bruninho 5 months ago 2
@300bruninho
2.9s, 14.53s, 17.68s are both claims. I never seen a test achieve those figures. The m5board test is 3.8s, 15.5, 18.0s. So agera only beat the SS 0-300kmh and 0-322kmh. And claim wise, bugatti veyron SS 2.46s, 14.4s,0-322kmh 16ish -s.
ASSHOLELA 5 months ago 7
@ASSHOLELA The Agere R was faster from 0-0-300km and 322km and the video I saw the Agere has a lot more acceleration than the SS and probably will go faster 0-400km
and estimated speed of 440km / h that the Agere will have to prove R
300bruninho 5 months ago
@ASSHOLELA and the veyron is fastest, 432 :)
giumessi1997 5 months ago
@ASSHOLELA Veyron is AWD while Koenigsegg is RWD. That's why Veyron accelerates faster at lower speeds. But over 200 km/h Koenigsegg is faster.
SuperThe86 4 months ago
@ASSHOLELA Watch James May's test and count by yourself... 0-200mph in more then 20, 21, 22 sec?! Bullsh*t :)
petarmilosevic 4 months ago
@petarmilosevic
you are absoluetly right. in fact, james may's test 0-200mph ~16.4s. he was using topspeed mode, which dramatically increases the topend accel. It lowers about 15% of the total drag, from 0.42 to 0.36.Autocar wasn't. you can see estimations of the 210-xkmh to 400kmh accel in my James May Veyron SuperSport Topspeed Run Analysis, or the 0-xkmh (to 330kmh) run from another test run in "Koenigsegg Agera R vs SSC Ultimate Aero vs Bugatti Veyron SuperSPort acceleration comparison".
ASSHOLELA 4 months ago 3
@ASSHOLELA yea you are right, 300bruninho is incorrect because if you look at the Guiness Book of World Records 2012, it states the veyron ss world record edition as the fastest. just check the Guiness Book of World records site.
LBP2FanZX28 4 months ago
@ASSHOLELA nup. Agera R hits 440 km and Veyron SS hits 431km.
KOSKESH43 2 months ago
@KOSKESH43
the agera R has never been tested to 440kmh. The veyron SS was also predicted to hit 440kmh or more before they actually tested it.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA Veyron SS 440km? loooool the speedo doesn't even show more than 430 km how come that fat ass can get to 440? the Wiki doesn't say 440km either! it says 431km
KOSKESH43 2 months ago
@KOSKESH43
according to bugatti, preliminary testing showed the bugatti to be theoretically capable to about 440kmh.
LOL if the speedo only showed 430kmh, then where is the needle pointing when it hits 434kmh on 1st run ehra lessein?
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
the passenger model of the veyron SS was never made to achive 430kmh. They are limited to 414kmh. So thats why they limit the guage to show only 430kmh.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA you love buggati way too much to your just trying to back it up!
Koeniggseg ALL THE WAY FOR ME
KOSKESH43 2 months ago
@KOSKESH43
I do not love bugatti. I love mclaren f1 but not bugatti. I do not hate any other car either. So all the things I say about cars are all objective.
Come back when the koenigsegg actually does 440kmh in a test.
ASSHOLELA 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA props to you! McLaren F1 LM is the best
KOSKESH43 2 months ago
@ASSHOLELA actually they tested the agera r to 273. something mph, thats what they said anyway but did yuo see the ssc 0-200 mph run, 6 runs all under 16 seconds to 200, ssc all the way my friend
rmf09024 2 months ago
@rmf09024
nobody tested the agera R to anywhere near top speed. Quote me a source for that info pls.
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@ASSHOLELA
needle will only point 430kmh in gauge but there are numbers down in speedo it will display 434kmh.
akay611 2 months ago
@KOSKESH43 The veyron runs out of track before reaching 440 km/h, this is the most stable car ever made with the Mclaren F1, that why the Veyron is heavy.
And people Koenigsegg are better and faster but i've never seen a video that prove this...
The Veyron SS record is now 1,5 years old a no other production car have beat that and the only car that come close is the ultimate aero.
edtk99 2 months ago
@edtk99 But everyone knows that the aero is unstable at thoses speeds and make terrible noise when the veyron is quiet and keeps passengers in luxury.
Bugatti said that they will continue realeasing fester cars if someone does a faster car than the Veyron SS.
btw I think that Mclaren should made a new version of the mclaren F1.
edtk99 2 months ago
@edtk99
FYI, The standard Veyron is actually faster than Ultimate Aero. It (Body #501) did reach 417 km/h without speed limiter before being limited to 408 km/h, that information is confirmed by Cars and Driver and National Geographic.
Tippotipo 1 month ago
@Tippotipo
source for that info pls. I never found that the standard veyron hit 417kmh but the veyron SS by captain slow hit 417kmh.
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@300bruninho agera r has not broken record yet sorry cock
nickster1318 5 months ago
@300bruninho veyron ss 0 - 300kph 14,6s look at official page of bugatti
11Kanal11 5 months ago 2
@11Kanal11 Veyon SS 0-300 km / h = 16.7 seconds you friend is wrong in this guineesss 16.7 sec 0-300km, you guys can not admit that the car was rather vcs 2 sec slower than the R Agera
300bruninho 5 months ago
@300bruninho dude look at the official page of bugatti there u can see the official number 0-300 = 14,6s ... idk whats with this car / driver in this video but as I said, the official number is 14,6s. thats what matters for me.
11Kanal11 5 months ago
@11Kanal11 then it is wrong in this guiness 16.7 sec and all Web sites as well, even when the Venom GT which made 14.1 sec 0-300km in the video was the Veyron 16.7 sec SS which means it does not do so unless the SS Veyron is too heavy
300bruninho 5 months ago
@300bruninho dude I think u talking about the veyron!!! but I talk about the veyron SS ... do some reseach! veyron is 0-300 16,7s but veyron SS (super sport) is 0-300 14,6s. : )
11Kanal11 5 months ago
@11Kanal11 you friend is defending the Veyron SS like crazy, I'm talking about the SS to see the videos ask anyone here who has a 0-300km / h is 16.7 s does nothing to change this reality
300bruninho 5 months ago
@300bruninho no comment ... u dont understand it ... and btw: what friend r u talking about? o.O
11Kanal11 5 months ago in playlist kareta & motosikal
@11Kanal11 friend who does not understand here is you
300bruninho 5 months ago
@300bruninho ??? lolz
11Kanal11 5 months ago
@300bruninho
the 9ff Gturbo 1200 also has impressive perfs :
0-100 km/h en 2.8 s
0-200 km/h en 7.1 s
0-300 km/h en 14.1 s
watch?v=L3mVkRQQodA&feature=relmfu
xenomorphelv426 5 months ago
@300bruninho 9ff Gturbo 1200 is at "only" 219000 Euros.
xenomorphelv426 5 months ago
@300bruninho the bugatti can also do 0-300 under 15 seconds man the only way u can see wich car is better is in a 1 mile race
aronvdberg 5 months ago
@300bruninho Swedish Style ;)
nITRONxxx25 5 months ago
@nITRONxxx25 I do not know if you want to speak English, my language is Portuguese'm from Brazil
300bruninho 5 months ago
@300bruninho Koenigsegg es un coche de sueco. (mi espanol es muy mal)
nITRONxxx25 5 months ago
@300bruninho the veyron has got bout 432 km/h tested guiness speed, it could be faster, if the road is longer.. then it'd reach 440.. the koenigsegg CAN'T reach more, douche!
TheFlashProject011 4 months ago
@TheFlashProject011 They should go to salt lake and see what speed they can reach (the old veyron reach 415 km/h @ salt lake) but they had a problem the machine who test the tires can't simulate speeds higher than 435 km/h
edtk99 4 months ago
@edtk99 and the koenigsegg Agera R is just able to reach 375 km/h.. and the bugatti veyron ss 415 km/h.. but the koenigsegg goes with biofuel, so it's better for the nature..
TheFlashProject011 4 months ago
Comment removed
carsinmyheart 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and the veyron SS did 434km/h, it's better than 415km/h :D
what do we care about nature ? if i watch that, i don't think to nature ... (about 30% of CO2 with cars, bikes, fly etc ..; and why don't we try to reduce the other 70% ????)
carsinmyheart 4 months ago
@TheFlashProject011 the agera is a good evolution for automotive but they forget that the production of bio fuel can be more harmfull for the planet then normal fuel production :/
edtk99 4 months ago
@edtk99 AND the bio fuel (E85) is more powerful than normal fuel (S95)
TheFlashProject011 4 months ago
@300bruninho
0-100km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 2.5 sec
0-200km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 6.7 sec
0-300km / h Bugatti Veyron SS>> 14.6 sec
with TC and PROPER driver ;-)))
petarmilosevic 4 months ago
@300bruninho and bugatti veyron 2000+ kg and koeningsegg 1300!!! koeningsegg shit !!!!!!!
emilrac100 4 months ago in playlist SIÊU XE
This has been flagged as spam show
@300bruninho
This test were made by Autocar.co.uk,
and I dunno what the guys at Autocar.co.uk smoke, but they tested the super sport wrong!
Its real resul 0-200mph (320km\h )is around 15-16 seconds.
On Bugattis official website it says 0-186mph (300km\h ) in 14.6sec
Do you really think that it need 8 more seconds to accelerate another 14mph?
If you dont believe me go and check out Bugatti's official website. I trust em much more...
Xjiei1 4 months ago
@300bruninho Well, Bugatti Veyron SS is still a better car
shornipp999 4 months ago
im in love with this car BUT NO MONEY TO BUY
playstation1331 6 months ago
AMAZING ACCELERATION!!!
STRATIS2011 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stupid car...
emomerda89 6 months ago
@emomerda89
stupid comment...
ASSHOLELA 6 months ago 70
@ASSHOLELA stupid man
emomerda89 6 months ago
@emomerda89 HAHA u got spammed
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 i prefer real car not stupid car....
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 this is a real car........
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 this car is only 400km/h...when a new car will go faster veron to be forgotten.....the real car are unforgettable
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 are you stupid?....it goes 266mph....which is 428kph......shut the fuck up b4 you make yourself look more stupid
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 you don't understand....bugatti exist only for his record (434km/h). if a new car go at 435km/H, bugatti will be forgotten.....
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 ummmmm no it wont...no 1 forgets the koenisegg ccx.....the ssc ultimate aero....those are slower
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 koenisegg, ssc....all stupid car...the real car are other like ferrari f40, lamborghini miura, bmw m1, lancia delta s4...but not bugatti
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 what you are saying makes no sense.....how about the mclaren f1....f430, 360 modena....shut up asshole and stop hating on this car just cuz its the fastest
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 i hate this car because in only publicity....v16 8000cc wow amazing..lancia delta s4 in 1986 with a 2000cc 800cv in asphalt cofiguration, like audi and other.....bugatti shit nly ferrari lancia alfa romeo lamborghini mercedes bmv audi....
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 you are a dumbass and you make no sense in ANY of your arguments so just shut the fuck up
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 yes sure....bla bla bla....
emomerda89 5 months ago
@emomerda89 LOL nice comeback mr. failure
prosurfer2222 5 months ago
@prosurfer2222 ok kid....
emomerda89 5 months ago
Porsche 9ff gturbo 1200 0-300 in 14.1 seconds :D and you can buy the off turbo 1200 for 219.000€
rgb51190 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I had a dollar for every pixel in that footage, I'd have a dollar
BoyOfSteel101 6 months ago