Great example is bugs:some attack our crops and we use pesticide.Some of the ones who were exposed to pesticide evolve through new generations(in a few YEARS,this has been observed!)so they can live with that pesticide. But the original group away from the crops didn't adapt because they weren't exposed. In fact, bugs evolve so efficient against it that we have a HARD time defending our crops.
My condolence to you Dr Sagan. Your work will be missed. I am studying biology in science all because of you. I want to make contribution of my own towards science.
He was implying it was easy for early man to look at the world and conclude it was created/designed because early man didn't have an answer for why we were here. The watch was a sort of metaphore, showing that an incredible piece of machinery so complex implied a watchmaker, so its easy for us to understand early mans point in history to make the "God" conclusion. But as of course we know now it was evolution via natural selection.
Not many people know there are two types of scientific theory. One is a hypothesis supported by evidence (the one everyone knows) but the second scientific theory is actually a scientific law but a law which cannot be defined as a single statement like the laws of thermodynamics. This scinetific law is complex and cannot be described as a single statement but has the same validity as law, it also is called theory. Thats what theory in theory of evolution means. Its the law of evolution.
Watch maker... I bet Sagan disproved this before the creationists even thought of it...
Probably a creationist watched this video up to that point one day.. said DURRR, turned the video off and went to his local church to share his new found knowledge.
@IanEColeman Actually the watch was thought of by William Paley and this is Carl Sagan responding to it. Another response, in book form, is Richard Dawkins' "The Blind Watchmaker."
Sagan was not the voice of God, Sagan actually existed. Carl Sagan wouldn't want to be the voice of any God imagined by humans, he was above that, he was a scientist.
I believe in Santa Claus so I guess that makes him a troglydite ???? natural selection plays a very important role @ the buffet table of life..................
@historyman8 Are you a fair reflection of your religion? Is it your faith that causes such hatred towards someone you do not agree with, or are you just a hateful person who happens to be religious? I seen many depictions and explanations of angry atheists. Now, I want to know the reasons behind angry Christians.
Do species die off or evolve into something that is unrecognizable from the original, in the event that the original cannot survive the changing conditions that caused the off-shoots in the first place?
@hellisice A species' ability to evolve past changing conditions does affect it's descendants. Major catastrophic events, like mass extinctions, are catalysts for new species to develop, because the radically changing conditions kill off the variants that cannot survive, giving more space and food for the ones that can adapt and survive. The recognizability, or lack thereof, depends on how radical a change is needed to survive. Hippos and Whales are related, but they are radically different
Darwin spent his life trying to fit his beliefs around his discoveries and forge a theory from it that would promote the world view we have to day, evolution simply CANNOT explain the origin of humans and has never been experimentally proven!!!
A theory is a hypothesis that explains fact and are supported by them. Evolution is a Theory, therefore a fact. Whilst what most creationists mean is that Evolution is a Hypothesis. (which it's not of course).
Gravity is just a theory. Therefore it's false. :P
It's funny that religious books do not pass even as hypothesis. They are just claims without evidence. They are the very thing creatonists claim evolution is: an assumption, a guess.
@Alienmad462 The problem with saying "its only a theory" is that yeah, its a theory, but there is alot of evidence to it, and without any more evidence then that is the only real conclusion, thus, it is treated as fact. If more evidence, that irrefutably revokes evolution, or any other theory, such as maybe the big bang theory, that theory would be changed to allow this new evidence. Also people would feel silly.
We are a process, us and all living things. That which is alive at this moment are the victorious in an endless biological equation. Those triilons of life forms that cohabitually exist within us, they that are our "emotions", our inner thoughts and our conciences. They and us are the result of infinite processes. What end then is there?,...there will be no end as there was no beginning. We will evolve until our emotional being binds us completely and whole.
This has been flagged as spam show
Great example is bugs:some attack our crops and we use pesticide.Some of the ones who were exposed to pesticide evolve through new generations(in a few YEARS,this has been observed!)so they can live with that pesticide. But the original group away from the crops didn't adapt because they weren't exposed. In fact, bugs evolve so efficient against it that we have a HARD time defending our crops.
PainSurgeon 1 week ago
it drives me insane that he gets cut off
mymorningzion 1 week ago
i've been watching carl sagan for 20 years,i never get tired of it,
MrNance91 3 months ago
2 creationists disliked this
aaroncito63 4 months ago
My condolence to you Dr Sagan. Your work will be missed. I am studying biology in science all because of you. I want to make contribution of my own towards science.
FrapsYou 5 months ago
says it like it is at 1:17 suck it creationist haha
Jakerrrooo 7 months ago
@Jakerrrooo oh noes i guess u win
empfeix 6 months ago
@empfeix Thank you friend!!!!
Jakerrrooo 6 months ago
AH WHAT DOES DARWIN AND WALLACE SHOW!
Jaredhalterman 7 months ago
@Jaredhalterman ...but as darwin and wallace showed, a great designer is not needed to explain the existence and diversity of life.
NORTHERNKONFLIKT 7 months ago
What does he mean with the word: Designer? Is he referring to "a" designer such as god? or something else? I didn't understand that.
Jimenezz89 7 months ago
@Jimenezz89
He was implying it was easy for early man to look at the world and conclude it was created/designed because early man didn't have an answer for why we were here. The watch was a sort of metaphore, showing that an incredible piece of machinery so complex implied a watchmaker, so its easy for us to understand early mans point in history to make the "God" conclusion. But as of course we know now it was evolution via natural selection.
ZaXJQuiX 4 months ago
Stupid fucking mormon commercials
maniacalXmiscreation 7 months ago 3
So if anyone ever says its only a theory. You can say ah its acutally a law.
SirPaFla 8 months ago
Not many people know there are two types of scientific theory. One is a hypothesis supported by evidence (the one everyone knows) but the second scientific theory is actually a scientific law but a law which cannot be defined as a single statement like the laws of thermodynamics. This scinetific law is complex and cannot be described as a single statement but has the same validity as law, it also is called theory. Thats what theory in theory of evolution means. Its the law of evolution.
SirPaFla 8 months ago
WHAT DID DARWIN AND WALLACE SHOW??
BandWagon1987 8 months ago
@BandWagon1987 ITS THE SECRET OF THE UNIVERSE xD jk watch the full video
15Gracieface 8 months ago
Watch maker... I bet Sagan disproved this before the creationists even thought of it...
Probably a creationist watched this video up to that point one day.. said DURRR, turned the video off and went to his local church to share his new found knowledge.
CARL SAGAN IS A HERO OF HUMANKIND.
IanEColeman 9 months ago
@IanEColeman Actually the watch was thought of by William Paley and this is Carl Sagan responding to it. Another response, in book form, is Richard Dawkins' "The Blind Watchmaker."
TTUsucks88 8 months ago
Sagan was not the voice of God, Sagan actually existed. Carl Sagan wouldn't want to be the voice of any God imagined by humans, he was above that, he was a scientist.
trekgeek1 10 months ago 8
uggh i hate it when u cut him off in the middle of a sentence
youkeylaylee 10 months ago 6
Sagan was the voice of God.
xshalludiex 10 months ago
Does anyone know the name of the music in the background? It's so beautiful.
TummyTush 11 months ago
@TummyTush Not sure what the first piece is...something by Handel perhaps? The second piece is the slow movement of Mozart's Clarinet Concerto.
IvanS112358 11 months ago
Science is taking the facts and creating a conclusion. Religion is taking a conclusion and trying to find facts to support it.
hitandrunboy 11 months ago 4
@hitandrunboy Failing*
megamcgee 11 months ago
@Faggotcocks Why are you here? no seriously get out.
checoto156 1 year ago
I believe in Santa Claus so I guess that makes him a troglydite ???? natural selection plays a very important role @ the buffet table of life..................
rongenman 1 year ago
sagan for president!!!!
duhhh187 1 year ago
@duhhh187 he's dead.
jonpaulmoen 11 months ago
Well, a cousin of trilobites still exist presently, Carl... good enough, right? heh heh
VexT916 1 year ago
Why did the video end where it did? Bah.
TroutButter 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nwo shill,glad you are in hell you prick
historyman8 1 year ago
@historyman8 Are you a fair reflection of your religion? Is it your faith that causes such hatred towards someone you do not agree with, or are you just a hateful person who happens to be religious? I seen many depictions and explanations of angry atheists. Now, I want to know the reasons behind angry Christians.
ElNerdoLoco 1 year ago
@ElNerdoLoco wow! great comment....so many angry people......I will re use your comment if you dont mind???
rongenman 1 year ago
@historyman8 /golfclap
Naddig74 1 year ago
Do species die off or evolve into something that is unrecognizable from the original, in the event that the original cannot survive the changing conditions that caused the off-shoots in the first place?
hellisice 1 year ago
Both, some species on the evolutionary tree evolve into another species that is unrecognizable, but some die out all together.
MaesMust 1 year ago
@hellisice A species' ability to evolve past changing conditions does affect it's descendants. Major catastrophic events, like mass extinctions, are catalysts for new species to develop, because the radically changing conditions kill off the variants that cannot survive, giving more space and food for the ones that can adapt and survive. The recognizability, or lack thereof, depends on how radical a change is needed to survive. Hippos and Whales are related, but they are radically different
TomYoRu 1 year ago
NOOOOOO
drinkill 1 year ago
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhh you cut it off!!
JackTheJokerNapier 1 year ago
dot dot dot.... you cut off the end of it dick
omfgzhax 2 years ago
I've learned so much from Sagan. He wanted to teach and show people the Cosmos and how it works and did it with style and class.
AgnosticFonts00 2 years ago 97
I was going to say that lol cheers!
DioMarti 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a load of tripe.
Darwin spent his life trying to fit his beliefs around his discoveries and forge a theory from it that would promote the world view we have to day, evolution simply CANNOT explain the origin of humans and has never been experimentally proven!!!
otaku8489 2 years ago
you need to understand something before you open your mouth and flood out stupidities and nonsense and expect it to be taken as worth listening to.
cheeky57 2 years ago
@otaku8489 It can't explain the human races
Eazy920318 2 years ago
just as we grasp onto every word the vids stop halfway through a sentence! AAAAHHHHH !
petestrat07 2 years ago 6
"... but as Darwin and Wallace showed..."*end of clip*
Why? :C
ZplitSilver 2 years ago 4
He has absolute intelligence, a natural way to understand the cosmos.
enronify 2 years ago 5
THANKS, themagus187
777TIZZable 2 years ago
Evolution Is A Fact Not A Theory, It really Happined, Carl Sagan.
A lot of people have ignorance of Carl Sagan Cosmos, And A LOT DON'T.
I sorely missed CARL SAGAN TOO, He was The Greatest of All Time, In what he did for HUMANITY.
777TIZZable 2 years ago 5
Agreed.
themagus187 2 years ago 10
A theory is a hypothesis that explains fact and are supported by them. Evolution is a Theory, therefore a fact. Whilst what most creationists mean is that Evolution is a Hypothesis. (which it's not of course).
ArianRohani 2 years ago
Also, creationists don't realize that things like the earth orbiting the sun are theories, too.
chchockey51 2 years ago 8
Gravity is just a theory. Therefore it's false. :P
It's funny that religious books do not pass even as hypothesis. They are just claims without evidence. They are the very thing creatonists claim evolution is: an assumption, a guess.
byteresistor 2 years ago 11
In the words of Isaac Asimov, "Creationists make it sound as though a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night. "
chchockey51 2 years ago 6
@byteresistor While I agree with you, a hypothesis is a claim without evidence :P.
A theory is a hypothesis that has been tested, evidence found in its favor and no evidence found to the contrary.
TomYoRu 1 year ago
@chchockey51
if you said that to a creationist they would reply. IT'S BEEN PROVEN IT'S A FACT. evolution is only a theory111
how would you reply?
say that there is no evidence that the earth orbits the sun.....:P?
Alienmad462 1 year ago
@Alienmad462 The problem with saying "its only a theory" is that yeah, its a theory, but there is alot of evidence to it, and without any more evidence then that is the only real conclusion, thus, it is treated as fact. If more evidence, that irrefutably revokes evolution, or any other theory, such as maybe the big bang theory, that theory would be changed to allow this new evidence. Also people would feel silly.
samuszoomer 1 year ago
We are a process, us and all living things. That which is alive at this moment are the victorious in an endless biological equation. Those triilons of life forms that cohabitually exist within us, they that are our "emotions", our inner thoughts and our conciences. They and us are the result of infinite processes. What end then is there?,...there will be no end as there was no beginning. We will evolve until our emotional being binds us completely and whole.
Michael1eleven 2 years ago
is that bigfoot off to the right at the very end of the video?
gunner4life1615 2 years ago 3
no, but 2:24 i can clearly see Nessie
magiceye0187 2 years ago 2
Carl Sagan is sorely missed.. He was a light in a country full of ignorance
Crims0nBehelit 2 years ago 161
To: CrimsOnBehelit I agree with You On Carl Sagan He Really Was the LIGHT in a World Full Of IGNORANCE.
But to those who are not ignorance We are happier people to have Learned from him, CARL SAGAN.
777TIZZable 2 years ago 2
@Crims0nBehelit Thank you.
DeleriosoAnormal 1 year ago
@Crims0nBehelit not a country a,World
duhhh187 1 year ago
@Crims0nBehelit Right on man, right on....
kinesthetiac 11 months ago
@Crims0nBehelit in a WORLD full of ignorance...
fattigbonddrang 10 months ago
@Crims0nBehelit fuck you just a stupid stereotype from the dumb video, you probably havent even been here have you?
jeffyjeffyjeffy 10 months ago
@jeffyjeffyjeffy U MAD?
ericmsandoval 9 months ago