It's odd how many truthers seem convinced that the official story "violates the laws of physics." Is this what we'd expect from a painstakingly planned and executed plot? That the plotters would deliberately make their cover story scientifically impossible?
Those fine folks at AE911truth are taking advantage of their audience's lack of expertise in technical matters like structural engineering. If one more amateur cites the Law of Conservation of Momentum to prove his point, I'll die laughing.
@TheHungrySnail Im not sure.. perhaps you should ask one of the engineers involved with the group. My guess would be that nobody has been able to poke holes in the Laws Of Physics... But thats just my guess ;)
@jizzmonger well.. my idea of normal is playing music on stage for hundreds of people on a regular basis, being adored by fans, and bought drinks by strangers at bars while trying not to cause too many fights among the ladies... Having a mohawk and tattoo's may not seem "normal" to you.. but Id say that my idea of "normal" is working out pretty good for me so far ;) Hows your "normal" life doing? LOLOL
@0p3nURiZ If you have to talk about it, you're not doing it.
At any rate, getting drunk, getting a mohawk and banging the occasional drunk whore are not really events/hobbies/training to cite when making a technical argument about a building collapse.
Don't you agree?
Or are the things you listed things that you think would be relevant on an engineer's resume?
@jizzmonger umm.. have you seen my other videos? The one of my band playing in front of a sold out house? I seem to remember someone stating that I look "normal" as grounds for argument against me? If you want to discuss something relevant than dont start out a converstation by inflating how much of an ignorant dick you are. So your an engineer.. are you ready to school me on this now? Or have you not found a way to debunk the laws of physics? I think you may need to get a life dude!
@0p3nURiZ Telling me how good you think your band is not germain to a technical discussion about collapse anymore than the fact that you bang drunk whores.
@jizzmonger hey man. you started it... momma always told me never to argue with an idiot.. they drag you down to their level.. then they beat you with experience... OH and btw.. I never said anything about banging drunk whores.. YOU said that.. I simply said is that I often have women fighting over who gets my company.. it was YOUR little dick that glorified the situation. Get a life buddy.. argue the truth.. not your BULLSHIT opinions! Thanks for playing.. by by now
@0p3nURiZ Only a 911 truther would think that his fantasy life with fantasy women is somehow germain to a technical discussion about a building collapse.
That's why the 911 "truth movement" (much like a bowel movement) has ceased to quit moving. They became all constipated with stupid people that think they know shit that they don't.
@jizzmonger First off watch?v=qewBFuTr59A .. my fantasy is reality bud... secondly.. where have you made any valid arguement at all? All you have done is troll on a well made video, and made yourself look like a fool. Clearly I am far more educated in the facts than you are.. as you have yet to address ANY of them. Instead you take shots and try to piss me off. Well, guess what bud.. I live a fucking awesome life.. and you are a YOUTUBE TROLL... once again.. get a life DOUCHE!
9/11 Truth Movement FTW.Every American should stand behind the family,s that lost loved one,s on this tragic day,stand behind the first responders who are still dying to this day becuase your government lied to them , they have been fighting for a new investigation for years,if one of your family members was murderd you would demand an investigation wake up people your government serves you not the other way round stand up and demand action.
Simple fact: if any of that building's potential energy (PE) went to destroying itself, it would have lost kinetic energy (KE) which requires that the building slow in its fall. Even NIST's models predict this, of course. There is no way it wouldn't predict that. It would break a stupidly obvious law of physics that apparently nobody in this stupid age understands anymore. If the building was causing itself to collapse,
@macvimto NIST has reversed its earlier denial of freefall and acknowledged a period of freefall comparable to this analysis in their final report on WTC7 released in November 2008. They did their own measurement with a point near the center of the roof line and came up with an acceleration of 9.81 for approximately 2.25 sec. Their report did not, however, face the consequences of this acknowledgment: that ALL RESISTANCE was instantaneously removed across the width of the building,
@macvimto supporting pre-planted explosives as the cause of the collapse.
In other words, Physics PHD John Gage got caught lying in a criminal cover-up. NIST will continue the criminal cover-up. We must wait longer for NIST to come clean and admit demolition for WTC7.
@macvimto Now here is where physics come into play. As WTC 7 was built gravitational potential energy was stored in the building. When something falls and there is nothing in its way all the available gravitational potential energy will be converted to kinetic energy and the object will attain free fall acceleration. The problem is that with WTC 7 there should have been a massive amount of structure in the way to slow the fall.
@macvimto It was like that massive interconnected structure just wasn't there. The official story requires more energy and momentum to have been present in this system than could have been there. But energy and momentum can't be magically created out of nowhere in a closed system. They must balance. According to the conservation law of energy energy cannot be created or destroyed in a closed system only converted to other forms.
@macvimto So the official 9/11 story requires an massive extra amount of energy that would be required to remove the eight stories of structure in the way. The laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum) were violated if the official story is true.
@macvimto The amount of missing energy is massive. Think about the amount of energy required to cut a massive core column with explosive shaped charges. Multiply that by 25. Add the energy required to cut the smaller perimeter columns multiplied by 58. Total both and multiply that amount by 8. Since the official story does not account for this massive extra amount of energy the official story violates the conservation law of energy and is therefore false.
@macvimto A similar case can be made for the law of conservation of momentum.
Consider a simple analogy. Suppose a car is suspended by one end 10 feet above another car standing on end on the ground. The first car is dropped. In NIST's alternate universe the first car will free fall right through the other car without slowing down. In the real world the first car would slow down as soon as it hit the second.
@macvimto Both cars would be crumpled and if they did not fall over would be standing one on top the other. To make the first car completely crush the other as well as itself while maintaining free fall acceleration would require a massive amount of extra energy in the form of say a jet engine. To refuse to acknowledge the extra energy source would be to violate the laws of physics.
Logically there is nothing wrong with entertaining a conspiracy theory provided it best explains the available facts. However when a conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics it enters the realm of the unhinged crackpot. 9/11
NIST's explanation of how WTC 7 fell violates the conservation laws: the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of momentum.
Thanks for taking the best line here and refusing to be sidelined by speculation. Stay on the science and people will be unable debunk. Please consider joining Paltalk and getting on mic there in The Truth Movement room. They need people like you to take forward the drive for a full investigation.
fuckwit
MrHopgoblin 2 weeks ago
It's odd how many truthers seem convinced that the official story "violates the laws of physics." Is this what we'd expect from a painstakingly planned and executed plot? That the plotters would deliberately make their cover story scientifically impossible?
Those fine folks at AE911truth are taking advantage of their audience's lack of expertise in technical matters like structural engineering. If one more amateur cites the Law of Conservation of Momentum to prove his point, I'll die laughing.
unRompecabezas 3 months ago
@TheHungrySnail Im not sure.. perhaps you should ask one of the engineers involved with the group. My guess would be that nobody has been able to poke holes in the Laws Of Physics... But thats just my guess ;)
0p3nURiZ 3 months ago
You seem normal. LOL
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger well.. my idea of normal is playing music on stage for hundreds of people on a regular basis, being adored by fans, and bought drinks by strangers at bars while trying not to cause too many fights among the ladies... Having a mohawk and tattoo's may not seem "normal" to you.. but Id say that my idea of "normal" is working out pretty good for me so far ;) Hows your "normal" life doing? LOLOL
0p3nURiZ 3 months ago
@0p3nURiZ If you have to talk about it, you're not doing it.
At any rate, getting drunk, getting a mohawk and banging the occasional drunk whore are not really events/hobbies/training to cite when making a technical argument about a building collapse.
Don't you agree?
Or are the things you listed things that you think would be relevant on an engineer's resume?
jizzmonger 2 months ago
@jizzmonger umm.. have you seen my other videos? The one of my band playing in front of a sold out house? I seem to remember someone stating that I look "normal" as grounds for argument against me? If you want to discuss something relevant than dont start out a converstation by inflating how much of an ignorant dick you are. So your an engineer.. are you ready to school me on this now? Or have you not found a way to debunk the laws of physics? I think you may need to get a life dude!
0p3nURiZ 2 months ago
@0p3nURiZ Telling me how good you think your band is not germain to a technical discussion about collapse anymore than the fact that you bang drunk whores.
You understand why right?
jizzmonger 2 months ago
@jizzmonger hey man. you started it... momma always told me never to argue with an idiot.. they drag you down to their level.. then they beat you with experience... OH and btw.. I never said anything about banging drunk whores.. YOU said that.. I simply said is that I often have women fighting over who gets my company.. it was YOUR little dick that glorified the situation. Get a life buddy.. argue the truth.. not your BULLSHIT opinions! Thanks for playing.. by by now
0p3nURiZ 2 months ago
@0p3nURiZ Only a 911 truther would think that his fantasy life with fantasy women is somehow germain to a technical discussion about a building collapse.
That's why the 911 "truth movement" (much like a bowel movement) has ceased to quit moving. They became all constipated with stupid people that think they know shit that they don't.
jizzmonger 1 month ago
@jizzmonger First off watch?v=qewBFuTr59A .. my fantasy is reality bud... secondly.. where have you made any valid arguement at all? All you have done is troll on a well made video, and made yourself look like a fool. Clearly I am far more educated in the facts than you are.. as you have yet to address ANY of them. Instead you take shots and try to piss me off. Well, guess what bud.. I live a fucking awesome life.. and you are a YOUTUBE TROLL... once again.. get a life DOUCHE!
0p3nURiZ 1 month ago
@0p3nURiZ What facts?
jizzmonger 1 month ago
@jizzmonger exactly my point.. you have yet to mention ANY.. get a life dude!
0p3nURiZ 1 month ago
9/11 Truth Movement FTW.Every American should stand behind the family,s that lost loved one,s on this tragic day,stand behind the first responders who are still dying to this day becuase your government lied to them , they have been fighting for a new investigation for years,if one of your family members was murderd you would demand an investigation wake up people your government serves you not the other way round stand up and demand action.
macvimto 1 year ago
Simple fact: if any of that building's potential energy (PE) went to destroying itself, it would have lost kinetic energy (KE) which requires that the building slow in its fall. Even NIST's models predict this, of course. There is no way it wouldn't predict that. It would break a stupidly obvious law of physics that apparently nobody in this stupid age understands anymore. If the building was causing itself to collapse,
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto it would have lost PE/KE and slowed. Since it did fall at free-fall, it wasn't causing itself to collapse.
This isn't, and never was, rocket science.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto NIST has reversed its earlier denial of freefall and acknowledged a period of freefall comparable to this analysis in their final report on WTC7 released in November 2008. They did their own measurement with a point near the center of the roof line and came up with an acceleration of 9.81 for approximately 2.25 sec. Their report did not, however, face the consequences of this acknowledgment: that ALL RESISTANCE was instantaneously removed across the width of the building,
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto supporting pre-planted explosives as the cause of the collapse.
In other words, Physics PHD John Gage got caught lying in a criminal cover-up. NIST will continue the criminal cover-up. We must wait longer for NIST to come clean and admit demolition for WTC7.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto Now here is where physics come into play. As WTC 7 was built gravitational potential energy was stored in the building. When something falls and there is nothing in its way all the available gravitational potential energy will be converted to kinetic energy and the object will attain free fall acceleration. The problem is that with WTC 7 there should have been a massive amount of structure in the way to slow the fall.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto It was like that massive interconnected structure just wasn't there. The official story requires more energy and momentum to have been present in this system than could have been there. But energy and momentum can't be magically created out of nowhere in a closed system. They must balance. According to the conservation law of energy energy cannot be created or destroyed in a closed system only converted to other forms.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto So the official 9/11 story requires an massive extra amount of energy that would be required to remove the eight stories of structure in the way. The laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum) were violated if the official story is true.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto The amount of missing energy is massive. Think about the amount of energy required to cut a massive core column with explosive shaped charges. Multiply that by 25. Add the energy required to cut the smaller perimeter columns multiplied by 58. Total both and multiply that amount by 8. Since the official story does not account for this massive extra amount of energy the official story violates the conservation law of energy and is therefore false.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto A similar case can be made for the law of conservation of momentum.
Consider a simple analogy. Suppose a car is suspended by one end 10 feet above another car standing on end on the ground. The first car is dropped. In NIST's alternate universe the first car will free fall right through the other car without slowing down. In the real world the first car would slow down as soon as it hit the second.
macvimto 1 year ago
@macvimto Both cars would be crumpled and if they did not fall over would be standing one on top the other. To make the first car completely crush the other as well as itself while maintaining free fall acceleration would require a massive amount of extra energy in the form of say a jet engine. To refuse to acknowledge the extra energy source would be to violate the laws of physics.
macvimto 1 year ago
Logically there is nothing wrong with entertaining a conspiracy theory provided it best explains the available facts. However when a conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics it enters the realm of the unhinged crackpot. 9/11
NIST's explanation of how WTC 7 fell violates the conservation laws: the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of momentum.
macvimto 1 year ago
Comment removed
macvimto 1 year ago
Comment removed
macvimto 1 year ago
Thanks everyone for the comments.. please subscribe and share this with anyone you think may benefit from it :)
0p3nURiZ 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0p3nURiZ Do you think we will get a new investigation into 9/11?
MilitaryMind4409 1 year ago
This is an excellent video, thank you for this.
PLC
PURELOVECREW 1 year ago
Hey man, you rock. Spread facts, not propaganda.
Respect!
shaygahweh 1 year ago 2
Thanks for taking the best line here and refusing to be sidelined by speculation. Stay on the science and people will be unable debunk. Please consider joining Paltalk and getting on mic there in The Truth Movement room. They need people like you to take forward the drive for a full investigation.
Hitstirrer 1 year ago 2
good video.
switchgrassfuel 1 year ago
well done . greetings from a european observer
mardesubjetividade 1 year ago
@mardesubjetividade thanks for the comment :) please share :D
0p3nURiZ 1 year ago