Added: 3 years ago
From: gatrfan
Views: 295,223
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (859)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Was thinking this.. First time I've seen it confirmed. Poor Hercules :-/

    Ps. Can barely find a single US army themed video without some fucking asshole claiming knowledge from having played a god damn video game. Modern Warfare hasn't taught anyone shit.

  • 3:01 NOPE!

  • i've been there. i've used it in Modern Warfare 2. :)

  • As much as there are those who want to retire this aircraft in favour of something more modern, the truth is that this is the best platform for this type of operation. Turbo prop engines are high-performance yet allow for slower cruising speeds and precise control of the aircraft during fire missions. The preference would be engine power plant upgrades, re-enforcing or replace existing fuselages, and improvement to their weapons systems. Like the A10, there is no substitute for this aircraft.

  • It is OP

  • Osamas dead

    Seals 4 the win

  • America always bully's countries that are not so powerful and cannot defend them selves. if you are not ignorant then you would now that American troops go to the western counries and kill innocent people and say it was an " accident " or " crossfire" . Good luck America on judgment day

  • @MrHamza091 "If you are not ignorant," then you would know that countries we go to are already being "bullied" by stronger countries or insurgents because they aren't strong enough and cannot defend themselves. If you and your country are able to go into a country where warfare takes place within a city block characterized by a dense civilian population, and where insurgents have no uniforms and hide like cowards, and not inflict collateral damage, then show us how it's done.

  • 0:16 she calls it an "invasion". Which is what it is. Give her a cookie. A lot of people can't do this.

  • Like in mw2 AC 130 ABOVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @josephrecinos14 lol that was the first thing that came to my mind i wannted to write this down but you beat it to me lol

  • I really like these planes. They're like the humvees of the air. I don wanna see these birds retired

  • Lol we didn't even need that ac130 to take him out

  • imagine if there was an ac130 for bf3 and u can fly it and everything

  • CBS anti-war propaganda report.

  • if they are so accurate when seal team 6 blow up the helo..they should have busted the rest of it up with the ac 130.....dont get me wrong...love this platform..

  • Comment removed

  • The C-17 as a gunship sounds like a good plan. However, the C-17 was designed to transport heavy objects at a higher rate of speed and altitude than the C-130. You need a platform that can remain steadily hovering at slow speeds around a killbox. The USAF has planned to supplement the AC-130 with a C-27J Spartan for higher priority missions. The thing about the C-130 is that despite being an old airframe, new versions are being built as we speak.The USAF will probably use a newer C-130J airframe

  • 11 KILLSTREAK HELL YES

    COD DID IT FIRST HATERS

  • @Shadowblood66 shut up COD addict go get your self a life

  • Captain May?! That dude was working for the 2nd AMU at Tyndall AFB, FL when I was there working on F-15s. Small world.

  • I work in the maint squadron in the airforce.The most over worked weapon is an airmen! Heaven forbid your jet breaks because there goes your wkd!

  • so theres only 1 ac-130???

  • i got 11 kills in nam in a row and they didn't give me this!

  • Wait a minute, gun breaks down, and you hit it with a wrench? Seriously? If moisture and electronic sensors were involved I could understand in some situations to tap something like that, but not this situation. What I think bothers me though, is this Howitzer isn't firing any faster automatically than it would manually since they have to manually load it anyways, and the news makes it sound like 'OMG the gun is borken this plane is falling apart! LOLOLOL!' It didn't look that bad to me.

  • We used badass stealth Blackhawks to get troops to take down Osama, we don't really need AC - 130s for all operations

  • @Brownboy411 not all ops but id like it above me raininpain down on them n they dont even no its cumin so c how they like it like our troops have to deal with there i.e.d.s id love that job thumbs up if anyone else would

  • I'll go one better... I raise you a AC-C5M Super Galaxy

  • On 2am Aug. 22, 2008, American AC-130 gunship called by US Special Forces attacked the village of Aziz Abad, Afghanistan and initially reported 30 Taliban killed with no civilian casualties - both claims untrue. Truth was shocking - 92 innocent civilians died, including 50 children, 19 women and old men, the highest single loss of civilian lives since 2001 invasion. Video in DISPATCHES: AFGHANISTAN'S DIRTY WAR. See AIHRC report.

  • @AccordGTR I've read that report. There are a lot of unverified claims in that report...

  • Need a strong light frame to support lots of guns and even make it faster with the jet engines, probably the AC17 would suit

  • Propeller technology has improved over the years to provide better performance for its form factor. Propellers provide versatility, as they can eat sandstorm weather and still fly. The C-130 is an indispensable aircraft for the missions it is running in the middle east.

  • the problem is the C-130 is a very old platform, they need to make an AC17, jet engines and a much newer frame to work with.

    i think they should make a boeing 747 gunship, 5 105 cannons 10 40mm boffors AA cannons and maybe an A-10's 30mm cannon or 2? sounds like a beast! the AC-747 make it happen!

    with the $50T of debt, not $14T like everyone says its much more then that...

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam 747 has a weak frame, it would fall apart. Now the only plane that the USAF has that could do the job of the Support Gunship is the now also old C5 Galaxy.

  • @maxi4492 could you imigine that!?!? A-C5 Galaxy gunship.... the C5 galaxy is huge it could hold SO meny guns and much faster, maybe even an A-C17 would be cool but i like C5s better

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam C-5 is kind of a old frame but it would be cool since it's massive. and the C-17 is a good plane since the C-17 can land in shorter distance's but the C-5 can carry large cargo loads.

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam but the reason why they use the C-130 is because it's cheaper and it goes slower.

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam AC-747 Epic idea mate!

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam but that'd make the plane ugly..

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam Are you sure of that? The AC130 could be circling at 30,000 feet ready to come down to assist if needed. No one on the ground would know. I wouldn't necessarily have been seen on radar thanks to the already stated jamming that the US was performing at the time. Very few people would actually know all details of the mission.

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam reason theres not a jet ac platform it would be to fast

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam The props are more fuel efficient and makes for a lower lowest speed... And I promise you, one 105 is PLENTY.

    And I rather have five AC-130 then one AC-747. :)

  • @swertinge07 Being an AC-130U Loadmaster, i can say from experience that the 130 is the best choice of airframe for the missions we ask of a gunship. When you can land a big ass 747 on a street in Baghdad, come and talk to me about changing frames.. 130's all day!

  • @noobguitar001 Then, perhaps you can tell me. Did I dream about AC-27 Spartan or what that look at as an option?

  • @swertinge07 I havn't heard anything about one.  It might work, but its such a small airframe. There wouldnt be a 105 on it, thats for sure..

  • @noobguitar001 It would probably relay on missiles for the big bangs.

  • @noobguitar001 Nice, finally a comment from someone who has a grip on military reality. I was kind of getting tired of these people going "lets get a jumbo jet and throw tank turrets in it". Best of luck, thanks for protecting the world and stay safe.

  • @swertinge07 the 105 is more then plenty, but 5 is...bigger. haha

  • Comment removed

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam I say two GAU-8 Avengers and throw in an M777 on that sucker to top it off.

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam aw come on, let's just say 20 miniguns ;) just a storm of lead

  • @lookhowlongmyusernam haha funny i would like to see the plane that can take the recoil of five 105 mm cannons firing.

  • @tanner0079 haha, ya that was a joke that everyone seems to be taking very seriusly

  • the ass clapper 130 can never get old

  • they are makeing new ac130s called ac130J

  • WOW they think they are old... serch New Zealand airforce, thatl make you laugh!

  • Say Irack with me, not eruhck jesus lol

  • @MakutaThe2 its pronounced E-Rock. trust me, i know.

  • Or could use the Greyhound

  • Put vulcan gatling cannons on the Osprey and take C130's convert them into AC 130's and fix the present ac 130's?

  • Could an Osprey take over the job?

  • @rds13601 I doubt an Osprey could handle the recoil from a 105mm or carry the payload needed at the altitude needed.

  • So I got 11 kills yesterday and tried to call in an AC-130...unfortunately it wasn't mission capable due to maintenance :(

  • well guess what osama bin ladin is dead

  • Time to modify C-17's for the job.

  • @rb21122b a jet is not a desirable weapons platform for that type of mission due to the increased airspeed.

  • No ac 130 wen Osama died

  • If we're going to allow private lowest-bidders to supply what we want to be the most badass military force on the planet, we should at least go to the Germans. We'd have them longer than congressmen.

  • when osama was killed no ac-130 was there blackhalks where there

  • @MrGocops OH, so you were there when it went down. Tell us about it.

  • @TheGeneralCase no it was all over the news

  • where is santa when i need it...........oh yeah, i am jew :S

  • That AC-130 was missing out on May 2nd!

  • Dang campers, got a 11 Kill streak…

  • ENEMY AC130 ABOVE!!!!

  • Hey BITCH! Where is your death toll in the last two years? You leftist cunt!

  • Jesus some of you people are fucking ignorant

  • @xunit94 do note tht this newscast wad prob recorded over 2-3 years ago maybe so tht is an inaccurate number

  • whts so bad about the ac-130, i wudnt mind having a flying bunker covering my ass while there are sand niggers with bombs strapped to them.

  • shit i see the AC-130s everyday they fly over my hosue

  • thing that pisses me off is that america dont mind spending on defense, whilst our fucking mod just decides to make massive cuts. fuck them

  • Why dont just build a new one???

  • Spooky is only about 20 years old. Spectre is over 40 and most overworked.

  • Well they got osama bin laden now.

  • it wasn't part of the osama mission

  • So the death toll of americans is 3987 but what about the Iraqi's?

  • @xunit94 Iraqi insurgents/republican guard is estimated in the 150,000+. Those are conservative too.

  • FFs... What does people expect? When you use eqiupment it gets torn, and combat gear really lives a rough life... So no matter what the manufactorer claims the gear can withstand when just used in home, war just tear stuff apart..

  • Not order for boeings mother fuckers.

  • i guess it wasnt flying when osama was killed

  • if it was mine id spray "your fucked" on the bottom, so all you see is a huge "your fucked" and a load of fat ass explosives raining from the sky >=)

  • I love it. We built weapons and don't want to use them.

  • captain James MaY??

  • I noticed that this B-Dog hasn't said anything about this since Obama got elected...What a piece of work.

  • fix'em

  • nope we cant carry shit. just guns ammo and fuel, there gonna fly for a looooong time i know i work on them

  • this was like five years ago and the AC-130 is still fyling to this day

  • Hey, here's a bright idea that didn't cost a government think tank hundreds of millions of dollars. Replace the AC130's old parts with modern technology and keep the same design...

  • @HermannTheGreat if they give it jet engeins that will diffet the perpiss of the tool of dathe it has to be slow so it can look on to targets

  • @TMBDragon519 Sorry I don't understand retard.

  • @HermannTheGreat then you must not understand your self retard

  • Well, it would seem there grim forecast of them being out of service didn't come true. They killed Bin Laden and the Spooky was flying cover. Now what CBS, any other stupid predictions?

  • @GunBroker100 You might call their prediction coming true "spooky". LoL sorry really cheezy, I know. couldn't resist.

  • Comment removed

  • OMG this whore ......good ridance

  • The C-130 is one of the most successful, versatile and economical airborne platforms in our fleet- it has been in service in one form or another in the US military since 1953, the only aircraft that is close in age is the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress- I doubt the engineers that created these planes envisioned them still being in service after 60 years, but that's how we used to build things in America...

  • @connberkshire You are so right, look at modern day appliances they only last a few years before requiring service compared to the old ones that keep on working!

  • More AC-130s and more A-10s please

  • I have an idea. They could build new AC-130's.

  • @TheFfej4 the problem is, that the technology in them is also pretty old to

    probably it isnt even available annymore in such a form

    i think making one will aquire also a total investegatement because it sertainly will be an hell of an update, though they are bussy with it

    i readed they wanted to adapt mc-130j's and upgrade those with some guns

    just the way like they did with the c-130

    but that idea was scraped

    though they gonna order a new ac-130 variant ac-130j i thought

  • @13thmistral A project in the works is a Converted C-5, the AC-5 Super Spooky. and the same thing with a C-17 Globe master, dubbed AC-17 Spooky II. Both involve engine retrofits to allow it to fly slower than normal limits. This unfortunately causes higher noise and fuel consumption rates. Currently being tested at white sands proving grounds. I think ordering new AC-130U's would be cheaper and more effective.

  • @GunBroker100 a mod of a c5 galaxy ?

    a c5 ?

    a goddamn c5 galaxy ?

    and the other one, never heard of that plain though

    havent heard of both being tested to replace the ac-130's

    i think they shoud have an plain that has those slow proppeler engines that the ac-130 has, but then some extra's for emergencies

    in anny case, somewhere i hpe, if they ever gona use a c5 galaxy and put guns in that one, they will have some guns with autoloaders and modenr controls

  • @13thmistral theres already desighns for a new transport carrier to replace the older c5s which were use for the old m60 tank.. we dont use m60s any more so switching c5 to a gun ship might be of better use for it!

  • @EsOoBaCtvp it still can transport much things i think no ?

    sertainly not that useless

  • @13thmistral well i mean they are useful but they could carry two m60 main battle tanks back in the day but they can only carry 1 abrams now. it was desighned for tank transport the millitarys just going to make a better plane that can do more

  • ok that was honestly an ok report, but that line mentioned by @kaivan33333 that was seriously crap who knows if that old son of a b!@#* will ever come out of hiding

  • The AC130 was only a concept in the Vietnam war with a DC transport plane that had a "few" upgrades of 4 mini guns and starlight scopes. Now the grandson of that is the AC 130 spooky gunship.

  • Captain James May, Retired as a Major in June of 2010 and is currently my AFJROTC Instructor. That man will change you life!! And thrill you with his Spec Ops and AC130 Stories. lol :D

  • @YouKnowWho360 I think I worked for him when he was a maintenance officer at Tyndall. He was prior enlisted as a crew chief right?

  • @cwelliver1985 That is correct.

  • This shows exactly why congress needs to pass funding for building new gunships!

  • Nuke'em already (joke)

  • @iAngelicAlex Nuke'em already(not a joke)

  • *prop plane in a jet age*

    HERPDERP Jets were more then functional back then. Prop and slow flying speed is much more efficient for this kind of vehicle.

  • 2:00 Did he just said captain James May ?? lol (have to watch "Top Gear" to understand ;p)

  • @khor11 HAHA, yeh he did

  • i was hoping to see Call of duty comments :)

    aahhh finnaly no CoD

  • That woman, Couric has ALWAYS been awful. What bullshit. CBS is a cesspool of liberal crap.  You can keep an airframe flying forever with the right maintenance and upgrades. When the Air Force finally retires the B-52 it will have been flying for EIGHTY FIVE YEARS !

  • Whoever was the designer of the AC-130 Gunship is one EVIL bastard...If i was an insurgent and i saw this Bad Boy add whip fucking Koran out and start saying me prayers...

  • Oh bullshit! Look at the B-52s. Older and through many more upgrades. The military will never retire a work horse like the AC-130. What could possibly replace it?

  • TU-95 bear wold be much reliable platform to thiskind of weapon..

  • "a prop plane in a jet age"...just how stupid can TV reporters be? It must be a job-prerequisite ..I wonder what he would call a helicopter with rotors "in a jet age". This jackass should be shoved into a Herc for a JATO ride and I`d like to see some footage posted here how he crapped into his pants.

  • ENEMY AC-130 ABOOOOVE !!

  • It's too easy to take out this plane

  • @The3nlightened0ne Please elaborate further for us since your smart. I'm curious what a self-describe genius would say.

  • @Imat00l

    True.

    Only an idiot wouldn't understand my statement.

    And when did I call myself a genius, lmao.

  • @The3nlightened0ne yep f-35s , chinese j-x11, russian migs all say hi (im sorry but my knowledge of fighters is incredibly lmited)

  • @The3nlightened0ne hence the fact that it flies during the night

  • @dawgfacesoldier

    I was imagining U.S using this plane against countries with heavy air defense systems.

    Bare in mind that this mighty warplane costs more than $190.

    It takes only a cheap SAM system to take out this plane especially due to its lack of stealth and maneuverability.

    I'm not saying this plane is useless. It's just too expensive.

  • @The3nlightened0ne A cheap SAM can't take that thing down,Its got very good counter measures and i don't think we would send that thing up if there were SAM's ,just sayin.Its perfect for the war were in now at least.

  • @evilmuffen117

    What about the Russian S-400 SAM system - the best and latest SAM system of the Eastern Word. It's cheap and highly effective (after observing the performance of the S-300)

  • @The3nlightened0ne yes,im sure it can be shot down with one of those,but like i said we wouldn't let it fly near that thing.

  • @The3nlightened0ne ac-130s dont always travel alone though, they can sometimes have escorts from fighter jets,not to mention they already have their very own self defense missiles. i think they wil be in buisness for at least 15 to 20 more years until 5th generation systems have completely taken over

  • Damn it!!! Why kids see AC-130, Pave Low, FN-Scar, always thinks it's from MW2?

  • Wow man. Nearly every video, guns, cars, music, racial and religious arguments, all just about have some fag mention Justin Bieber. I don't care if you're trash talking about him or whatever please stop mentioning his name. You know it's haters that make you famous. He wouldn't be half as famous as he is without you fucking retards getting on every video with this shit and somehow get so many thumbs up.

  • I wanna use the 105mm on the Westboro Baptist church.

  • @coolcatevan9 You too? Give me that and a Bofors anti aircraft gun from WW2. BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM...building fail.

  • @punkfan90 Thanks for your comment I'll put it with the rest of pile. Have a good day.

  • as soon as justin bieber gets that half-time show.....

  • I'd rather have my Tax DOllars going to defense stuff than some douchebag on welfare.

  • @ajsaccount1991 im with you on that,

    cut the welfare!

    flood all that money into the military

  • @ajsaccount1991 shut the fuck up

  • @ajsaccount1991 yeah, because when it goes to defense, it will actually be used on something productive.

  • @ajsaccount1991

    Thank you!

    Sir, being about the only moderate left alive in this country, I'm not a fan of our oversized military in the least. But, if I had to choose between a big military and a big welfare state, I say we need to re-tool and build a second generation C-130 that's even bigger and better.

  • disgust what we use to kill humans with(us). We spend more on weapons than we do education and heath care(oh that right we pay for it individual). and to top it all of it being used in a illegal war/invasion. but we're in there now a can leave. 8 month pregnant and a shotgun marrage. if you leave they come get you, if you stay, you got to take care of the baby.

  • i dont care how old it get this bad boy saves lives

  • easy target for any fighter or SAM

  • Government has the money believe me it does

  • The ac-130 is the perfect air tank foo missions like that. Though i've seen one with jet engines Idj how it hovers or get into a circular motion

  • @EndofDays213 no such thing as an ac130 with jet engines... nor does it hover... COD has plagued youre young mind.

  • @punkfan09 i dont play cod i never played those type of games until a week ago when i bought medal of honor but since then nope. howed would you know if it exists or not thanks for your fallacy my friend.

  • @EndofDays213 You used a thesaurus I see. It was no fallacy, it was the truth. The closest thing to a jet engine c130 would be maybe a c-5 or a c-17 but even that is a huge stretch.

  • the ac-130 is not the main weapon used to defend troops its used primarily for SF

    who cares if its a prop plane you cant have a gunship with jets they wouldnt be able to hit a thing

    and hell if you dont like them lets get some more they are the most amazing weapons on this planet

    plus that plane was probably the oldest and least cared for out of all our ac-130s

  • @gta, I agree w/ you the b-52 has been around for a long time and hasn't had a lot of upgrades

  • "The 40-year-old AC-130 is probably the most overworked piece of equipment in the U.S. arsenal."

    I disagree.the B-52 has been literally abused ever since it was created.

  • At 0:53 was that a bullet or a missile? That shit is huge.

  • @kakashi202 an 105mm round for the M102

  • I say it is one of THE best weapons. Its a flying tank. I'd say upgrade the Ac-130 and give DEATH FROM ABOVE

  • I love the AC-130, it is one of the scariest weapons we have! I'll be damned if they do away with it! WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN AND SENATOR! We need new ones with upgrades!

  • dam they better make more of them are i will be pissed

  • AC 130 above!

  • If the AC130 goes out of service I'm gonna be really sad D:

  • make some new ones FFS America is the richest country (maybe second now cuz of the arabs and their oil) in the world