String Theory Model

[NathanEvansComposer]

omg i'm actually dying at the humping each other comment

[Elena10110]

Fuck y'all self-proclaimed individualists. Obama is the best president.

[Elena10110]

Atheistm FTW!

[fikimiki44]

yea i like good porn!!

[xMikenugex]

what created the strings ? : P

[fikimiki44]

@xMikenugex

Obama!!!!

[MissLucyBoomer]

Aren't strings much smaller than that? 

[MrMcVilla]

@MissLucyBoomer wow - you must be blonde...

[MissLucyBoomer]

@MrMcVilla

Strings are thousands of times smaller than an atom. There isn't just one big string inside every quark.

Kudos on being mature by the way.

[MissLucyBoomer]

@MissLucyBoomer

Thousand billion time smaller*

quarks are also smaller too but whatever.

[wowsa0]

@MissLucyBoomer As far as I understand it, String Theory proposes that quarks ARE strings, as this video shows. Previously, the fundamental particles were considered as dimensionless points, but string theory says that they are 1 dimensional 'strings', which are not just thousands of times smaller than the atom, but many times over again.

This is the just the impression I've got from reading things like wikipedia anyway.

[JaysanJanabel]

Do this mean that matter doesn't exists at all and everything surrounding us is just a lump of energies? Look, everything's made from molecules, which are made from atoms, consisting of nucleus and electrons. Therefore, the radius of electron's orbit is so big and nucleus is so small, which means there's empty space instead of matter. Also the protons and neutrons aren't plastic balls, there made from quarks, just vibrating "strings", not solid. Universe is created really strange..

[BudoScience]

the quarks(3 smaller spheres) are not just made of 1 string each, its actually a whole fabric of vibrating strings of energy. They each vibrate at different frequencies. I like the 3d electron cloud model representation though lol. Oh and there are either thousands or millions of quarks per every proton and neutron. the three quark representation is good though. The names of the 6 quarks that we know of are Up, Down, Strange, Charmed, Top, and Bottom. 3 go to the protons and 3 to the neutrons.

[wowsa0]

@BudoScience I'm pretty sure there are only three quarks inside each proton and neutron.

[BudoScience]

@wowsa0 idk. I wasn't completely sure. It would make sense if protons and neutrons were made up of quarks, that there would be more than just 3 or else they would have been found quickly. But now i guess im assuming that just because there are fewer that they are automatically larger. Im gonna have to look that up now. I knew 3 types of quarks went to each but didn't really think about how many there were inside of each.

[FallofDarkness55]

Einstein's theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, string theory, and the holographic universe are all mind-fuck topics that are beyond intriguing.

[OldSchoolSkill]

Of course GuySoft42's work is a serious endeavor that requires both scientific knowledge, theoretical discipline plus software and graphic expertise. I genuinely respect all that!

However, I just saw a rerun of Austin Powers, so all I could think of was imagining Austin saying to a scientist, "You mean the entire universe is composed of jiggling jubblies being held in place by tiny strings? I saw that last night at the gentleman's club!"

it's still a good animation... ;-)

[harlosik13]

the scale is all wrong a string is 10000000000000000 times smaller than a quark. ie a quark is 10^-17m a string is 10^-33m.

[DarkPikaruto]

@harlosik13 A string is actually 10^-34 meters. Since there isn't any explanation following the video, I believe the string is actually the little plasmid-like blob in the quarks (I think, sorry, I'm a seventh grader who just started studying this for fun). This video is only an interpretation, so it doesn't have to fit the scale.

[notusualtalk]

Weak animation.The atom does not look like beach balls.The spheric image of the atoms is very old and inaccurate.

[Pra5286]

balls are touching, thus, this is extremely gay...

[warner735]

@Pra5286 LMAO

[Mavericker7]

guysosoft there is no sound.

[eah2119]

This is confusing. Is it strings or quarks?

[Alkenphel]

the strings would be millions upon million of times smaller than that btw

[cbtalis]

I dont get it, is this saying that every quark is a string?

[TheFounderUtopia]

@cbtalis

No, the maker of the video smply got quarks and other subatomic particles confused with the strings of string theory.

This is not an accurate visual representation of string theory.

[ZRadach]

@TheFounderUtopia this is the only comment someone that just watched that needs to read

[DarkPikaruto]

@cbtalis No, the string is located INSIDE the quark. This is not really a good quark:string ratio of size. The string is actually MUCH, MUCH smaller.

[NavB00]

Mmmmmmmm this turned me on ahahahah

[Dirtboy101]

so is this saying that sub atomic particles are oscillating strings? I am confused 10 fold!

[DarkPikaruto]

@Dirtboy101 The strings are put at a staggering scale compared to the quarks. The strings are actually smaller than you can imagine.

[orionasmb]

they r=are actually MUCH smaller.

If a proton where the size of the solar system, a string would be the size of a tree

[FreakyDoudou]

@orionasmb,

realy???

[daguyhuluvsvids]

@FreakyDoudou hes screwing witcha. if an atom where the size of the earth a string would be the sze of an oa tree. learned it in science

[sidewaysfcs0718]

well ..its hard to represent that in a youtube video ....its only ment to make people visualize

its hard to visualize sand grains interacting at kilometers ....wich is equivalent to how elementary particles work...the distances are so big and the particles are so small

just like the distances in our galaxy as so big ....

[vCALIJURI]

@orionasmb True,the mass of a prontons are 1 but the stings provided by him are EVEN smaller

[nickharvey7]

Looks good!! spheres and strings together

[behnamasid]

now I know how electrons are born.

[gregjockca1001]

wrong, you asshole. electrons are delivered to atoms by electron storks. THAT'S how electrons are born.

[gregjockca1001]

it's only a beautiful animation if you're high on acid. it looks like CRAP when you're sober.

[gregjockca1001]

whydie666, not really cuz this vid is SHIT.

[gregjockca1001]

why bother? if you're too stupid to visualize without having to make PURDY GRAPHICS then you're what's called a "JEBEDIAH". now go fuck yourself, cletus. don't you have a cow to milk? your mind is inferior and you disgust me.

[gregjockca1001]

whydie666, the fact that you're wasting your time milking elderly women just says everything about you, trash.

[behnamasid]

looks like the protons are having sex with the neutrons,

[gregjockca1001]

they're making gluon babies.

[7glitch]

coliding universes??? whats the space in between the universes made out of ? how can something side by side with something colide? you have to have space in between. just if anyone was asking. im not a "scientist' or nothing

[sirLEVITSKY]

yeah the strings should be a little smaller lol. A couple of billion times smaller :)

[EarthboundEnigma]

Kind of reminds me of the Plum Pudding model days.

Any chance I could get that blend file for a presentation to my class?

[cowgoesmoo2]

The strings aren't by itself therefore it's a wrong idea. Plus, the electrons are pictured wrongly. Since wave fucnction, the electron paths should be replaced by waves.

[MunchVids]

Yeah, most models of atoms today still show electrons as finite.

[generatorium]

lol funny

[WhoresOfTijuana]

What if C-A-T actually spelled Dog?

[cowgoesmoo2]

Well too bad you're screwed so shut up.

[maleNOTfemale]

u might go mental because of thought that these strings well theoretically u can cut in a half and than again in a half and so over and over again. Say :a millionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a centimeter **. times 6

we've got so powerful minds huh ?

[viperz22]

Today, many physicists believe matter (including atoms themselves) to be made up of the tiniest things of all little vibrating strings. If this were the case, the theory would dictate that these strings be somewhere around the Planck length, which is thought to be the smallest possible size in existence, somewhere around ** a millionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a centimeter **. To these things, atoms might seem as large as the entire universe is to humanity.

[sirLEVITSKY]

Not as much I believe. They actually gave an example during one of the documentaries and if an atom was to be as big as our Solar system, then the string would be about the size of a tree on Earth.

Although the theory seems very complete in most part, I think they went a little far into their imagination with the mathematical equation. Colliding parallel universes seem a little over the top.

[shakyl008]

i agree with, the strings, though i'm not sure how small they are, they should be way way smaller then that!

[Richy15251]

They're about the plank length

[ARIOVISTIX]

Its hard to imagine string theory while watching beach balls having sex...Thats my theory anyway...

[shakyl008]

epic!

[reelsask]

string theory is crazy

[Perrickan]

Reminds me of a fat guy going for a jog.

[jergi313]

HEY!

I resemble that comment

[eerik123455]

Can you explain this more? Are quarks essentially closed strings? I though quarks were much larger than strings...

[JmatthewBAIL]

Although a month has past, ill answer.

your right quarks are very much larger...so it is most defiantly not to scale, but i don't blame him.....considering a string is about the size of Planck's length..which is so small, the analogy must used is that, if an Atom was the size of our entire universe, a sting would roughly be the size of an average tree.

and to add, the strings here are 3D, strings are to be 2D.....they do not have a width. They are intensely flat.

[eerik123455]

I still don't understand how they arrived at the shape of a "string" but I will have to do more reading. What is "dark matter and energy", matter that is made of something other than strings, or are they strings but they don't vibrate like other strings. Are light rays/energy quanta extremely fast moving strings? Are de Broglie wavelenghts any form of matter stretch out to a string?

[JmatthewBAIL]

well from what i know, They sorta stumbled on the idea of strings. Strings so small they could look like a point-particles, where a tiny spec when zoomed in all the way its really a vibrating string, but after 1st failing to describe the strong force. 2 physicist had found it had gluon type properties(what makes strong force), and found it also had something to explain what could be subatomic gravity, also explains the other forces and all of matter. but it was intensely complicated.

[JmatthewBAIL]

To answer why stings it all started in 1968 with Gabriele Veneziano stumbling on a old formula by the 200 year old mathematician, Eulder this formula explained the properties of interacting particles (what CERN does) in one fell swoop., but Vebeziano knew it worked but not why it worked, so not till the 1970 when 3 physicist tried to crack the Eulder code. and found that if u imagine elementary particles as 1-D vibrating strings it described the interactions it in Eulder's formula.

[JmatthewBAIL]

But to explain the stings and there vibrations, the harder it is for the sting to vibrate, depending on what particle they inhabit they have different tensions, the greater the tension the more energy it will have because it needs more energy to move. because looser strings need less energy to move, so less energy is what they have...and E=MC^2 tells us energy is matter, the tenser the string the greater energy the great energy = greater mass. This tells us why things are heavy and light.

[JmatthewBAIL]

and if you do read all these comments, then your understand should be better. I dont know how much u do know, so i hopes that enough. But the Light quanta(photons) have ZERO mass, this is because of quantum mechanics's Uncertainty Principle(in this case Fluctuation in energy) , and where just like normal wave, the fluctuations end up canceling the waves out, and when there are perfect cancellations you get a zero mass particle. So a photo has a very very very very small, almost no vibrations.

[AlgeKalipso]

no you need to show the electron string :P

[daw3]

they look like they're humping each other....

[guysoft42]

This is why they say you should never read youtube comments. :-S .

[amabodie]

Youtube comments say more about the human condition than all the psychologists in the world put together. peace.

[GeorgesBarras]

@guysoft42 funny though

[missmadirules]

@daw3 get a sense of humor dumb ass.

[esraretin]

@daw3 whohohohohhsahahahaahahhah lol

[professorfontana]

@daw3 Hahahahaha thumbs up

[CarbonSkyline]

Interesting... if this theory is true then there could be a possibilty of the existance of parrallel universes.

[guysoft42]

Well, parallel universes are becoming a popular mathematical solution in recent theoretical physics. However we have no experimental proof at the moment for any of it.

[LifeSanctification]

@guysoft42 Ancient religions have a connection with this theory, the ancient Vedas say there are infinite universes and it explains so much more, it covers the whole science.

[thoughtfix]

Thanks for becoming my 100th subscriber!