I am watching these videos starting with 12/12 and leading to 1/12, viz. backwards. It ends badly on 12/12. I see that this one, 11/12, is much better than 12/12. I will proceed (backwards) until I have viewed 1/12. So far, what I have noticed is that each psychology has its own prejudices. Dawkins is smart enough to limit himself to the argument that 'flying teapots in orbit around the earth is hard to disprove,' and so he wisely confines his argumentation to the question of ontological proof.
I am watching these videos starting with 12/12 and leading to 1/12, viz. backwards. It ends badly on 12/12. I see that this one, 11/12, is much better than 12/12. I will proceed (backwards) until I have viewed 1/12. So far, what I have noticed is that each psychology has its own prejudices. Dawkins is smart enough to limit himself to the argument that 'flying teapots in orbit around the earth is hard to disprove,' and so he wisely confines his argumentation to the question of ontological proof.
paradirob 2 years ago