WTC Construction Manager - Twin Towers can take multiple plane impacts ! Filmed January 2001

[KidMeatball]

His mosquito-net analogy is wrong. A mosquito net doesn't hold your door together like the exterior columns did in the WTC. I would also extrapolate that if the pencil you shoved through your screen door were soaked in kerosene and lit on fire, your door and possibly your kitchen would be reduced to ash.

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball also you fail to realize aluminum cant penetrate steel just like a pencil cant pierce the netting and he didnt say shove, a hand didnt come out of the sky and pick up a plane and smash it into the towers, you my friend need to study steel framed buildings and crash physics to understand

[KidMeatball]

@poznanski666 Fine, then. Revise my comment to read: "...the pencil you shot through your screen door..."

Water can cut steel. Surely water is softer than steel, how can that be possible? Care to give us a lesson in physics? Why can water cut steel, but aluminum can't?

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball when water penetrates steel its concentrated to a very small small point kinda of like armor piercing rounds have very pointy edges or how asian guys break bricks with there heads, but like i said 3rd law of physics water pressured into steel cuts whole thru water, u take steel and hit a wall of water it will fall apart, the same analogy dosent work for an aluminum plane and a steel wall, the plane would be obliterated

[KidMeatball]

@poznanski666 look up the USS Hinsdale. She took a hit from a kamikaze that left an aluminum plane shaped hole in her steel hull. Face it, you don't know as much about physics as you claim.

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball before you comment any further maybe you should read this probably a Tony Kawasaki Ki-61 carrying three 132 lb. bombs hit the ship on the port side at the water line in the vicinity of frame 80. taken straight from wikipedia, the planes on 9/11 werent carrying 400lbs of explosives, the small jap plane didnt enter the ship just created a hole from explosives and a very small hole i may add

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball and may i remind you that the planes wings did not enter in the boats impct just the engine which may have some metal components but the hole in the wtc had wing marks take a close at the hinsdales damage not much wing damage

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball and one last most ships outer steel plating is only 1/16" or even less thicker, while the wtc ranged from 1/4" to 2.5" thick im sure that a small hole whould be created by the plane but no wing damage what so ever like we see in the photos of the towers

[KidMeatball]

@poznanski666 The bombs penetrated the ship and exploded inside, read what you quote more carefully. The hull damage was all plane, no filler, aluminum plane cutting a steel wall.

[poznanski666]

@KidMeatball so you mean to tell me that even the whole engine was made out of aluminum cuz to me the whole looks like only the engine penetrated the rest of the plane disintegrated upon impact type in f4 phantom crash test and youll see wat i mean, an aluminums plane engine is strong enough to penetrate but not the wings

[xMISSUTUBOVAx]

guys, when are you going to get it? 9/11 was a fake!

[poznanski666]

@xMISSUTUBOVAx its not a technical problem its just people in the us are raised to belive everyhting there told because its the environment they grow up in, change that and you have free thinking americans

[xMISSUTUBOVAx]

@poznanski666 you're probably right, but in my country it's the same, but i think it's our duty to question everything the government tells us!!

[poznanski666]

@xMISSUTUBOVAx of course people lie the government isnt excluded and buildings swallowing planes whole is just a mockery to physics

[aviomaster]

@Gtfoguy1 - I am just saying , Osama Bin Laden is USA government hit man for secret opps. Not just Osama Bin Laden but radical Muslims From Bosnia Kosovo to now Libya Syria USA giving them full support and they love it. Benazir Bhuto said Osama Bin Laden is dead , I believe her more than CNN or USA government propaganda channels.

[dan32749]

When are we going to grow a pair and arrest the nwo scum?

[aviomaster]

@Oddballmarine90 -- HEAVIER maybe yes FASTER NO. YES terrorists did 9/11 OK

WHY there are no more 9/11 They run out of suicidal Allah followers.

[Gtfoguy1]

@aviomaster LOL, you're an idiot. For one, Allah is God translated from Arabic, two the CIA runs Al Qaeda. It's been proven time and time again that Osama Bin Laden died as a CIA asset, in 2001, he died of diabetes in an AMERICAN Hospital.

[camcussion]

To what documentary or film does this footage belong?

I would like to see the rest of it sometime.

[ADEC00L]

lol titanic all over again

[aviomaster]

IF this is not ENOUGH what is ? ... YOU dumb brainwashed  fucks .

[Oddballmarine90]

@aviomaster

Well the 9/11 planes were heavier and faster.

[l3d3nn3]

Yeah but the theory of the "unsinkable" Titanic was based on the architectural technology level of that day in 1909. The twin towers were built almost a century later with much more understanding of the science of atchitecture. Just think how fast technology advances - your computer is obsolete within a couple of years! Check out 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analy­sis/design.html

[rgs11]

@l3d3nn3 Exactly! Also, you wouldn't expect any of Titanic's engineers to say (especially after the fact as we have with the Towers) that the Titanic had been specifically designed to slam into icebergs at full speed. It's ridiculous how some people still try to claim that "no one could have imagined a jumbo-jet flying into the building".

[PeaceFroggs]

@rgs11 Think about this ok, with common sense. 110 stories in less than 10 seconds. If you take a basketball, and drop it from 12 feet in the air, it would take at least 1 second for the basketball to reach the ground right? In other words free fall speed. Now each floor was 12 feet high, so lets be generous and say it took 1 second for each floor to fall 12 feet, that's 110 seconds. On 911 both towers fell in less than 10 seconds. only explosives can do that.

[rgs11]

@PeaceFroggs You forget that gravity causes objects to accelerate; objects to not fall at a constant rate but fall at about 32 feet per second per second and thus accelerate. If you stood atop one of the towers and dropped a ball, it would reach the ground in about 11 seconds so you are right to say that the towers fell at about "free-fall speed" and you are right to say that this is highly illogical.

[PeaceFroggs]

@rgs11 "32 feet per second per second" Are you retarded?

[rgs11]

@PeaceFroggs LOL! g = 9.8 m/s² where g is gravity, m is meters and s is seconds. This equation can also be expressed, once again: objects in Earth's gravity fall at a rate of "32 feet per second per second" or 32 feet per second SQUARED.

Unless you intend to make an ass out of yourself, I would suggest you stop calling people names or at least educate yourself before you do. Your comment, in all honesty, is the biggest FAIL! I have ever seen. You get an F.

[PeaceFroggs]

@rgs11 Listen, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know A- planes are hollowed fragile aluminum structures B-Jet fuel, basic kerosene, is stored in the wings of the planes C- Most of the Jet fuel was burnt on impact, huge fireballs D- at least 80 undamaged floors, which should have given resistance to the collapse, not g = 9.8 m/s² , E- 100 000 tonnes of concrete pulverized into dust in less than 10 seconds = watch?v=YLb2yas0zbw

[rgs11]

@PeaceFroggs Like I said before: you are right to doubt that the towers, not to mention wtc7 fell at nearly free-fall speed. The tops of the towers fell to the ground as if there weren't 109 floors beneath them. I agree that this is very strange. Those floors should have caused resistance and slowed the fall but they didn't. Also, the buildings should have fallen over if at all.

I'm only pointing out that your misunderstanding of gravity doesn't help your argument.

[PeaceFroggs]

@rgs11 OK cool. I'll ponder that some more and take it into consideration.

[simonmullen]

the titanic was unsinkable to

[texas224]

@simonmullen When Humans presume, shit starts to happen.

[GunsOfThePhoenix]

Fake notice how everyone associated with WTC is a Jew/Zionest.

[FahlazadDO]

An American Jew called Larry Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease for the WTC on 24th July 2001

A nearby airfield (Stewart Air Force Base) is owned by Ronald Lauder founder of a school in Herzliva for the Mossad

Do the math you'll get 9/11. Zionists = BIGOTS, TERRORISTS

[shadowthewedgehog]

@FahlazadDO So its an insurance scam?

[FahlazadDO]

@shadowthewedgehog I think, because the economy of America plummets at that time. But the Zionists wants to take control of the WTC and Air Security so that they can put the blame on Terrorists. No available airline can flew that low if it did they already be intercepted by the air force but no air force were there, because it was already under control by the Zionists

[TheHagueCityTHC]

Woah !

Thanks for posting !

[waldentree]

good one !

[oicub2]

1984

9/11 was an OGA Job

[ZionistWorldOrder]

911 was an outside/inside job. Israel.......

[kingklick77]

shit was imploded from the inside, a fucking unidentified flying object hit the towers, wasnt no plane, more of a oval sphere. will the truth ever be told about this shit?

[marcellogentile1]

Wow

✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰­✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫✰✫✯✰­✯✰✫✫v✰✫✯✰✯✰✫✫

[TruthSeekerUK]

Great spot.

[VexZeez]

Another great find!

[george2648]

real talk here my friends

[OGdank13]

some real shit



[UndefeatedArmy09]

Nice find man :)

[loveisall1000]

good stuff! keep getting this out there! 9/11 was an inside job.

kev UK