Added: 4 years ago
From: Nova9911
Views: 2,425,290
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (605)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 113 people dont know anything about engines...

  • is this an l98????

  • O and CHEVY SUCKS BOOTY EVERY CORVETTE THEY MAKE LOOKS THE SAME AND USES THE SAME ENGINE AND THE CAMAROS R UGLY AND SLOW AS HELL JUST LIKE ALL THEIR OTHER CARS LIKE THE CRUZ AND PEICE OF CRAP SONIC

  • @MYNAMEISBBOYFIRE Ford sucks.No interchange since Ford does tons of 6 month changes.Least any part for a small block chevy is easy to get and dirt cheap to build.Plus the parts interchange for a Chevy.You can take a starter off a 4.3 and install it on a 350 real easy.Ford starters,most auto parts stores ask if the vehicle has an auto or manual transmission and this is important info to get a Ford starter.I wonder why you see a small block Chevy in older Fords and most street rods

  • O and guess wat: American manufactuers are being helped and use foreing engineers so HAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!! so that would make American engines suck compare to foreing ones so basically if ur talkin about how ur car is all american or watever and is better than foregn ones get ur facts straight

  • i like this video cuz they used a chevy engine

  • funny how the pushrod motor gets the bad rap for being outdated, but

    that the much older inline 6 design (early 1900s) is so dear.

  • valve covers and cylender heads

  • whats the blue thing called and the thing and under the blue thing called?

  • @FromThe3PointLine Blue thing is a rocker cover, the thing under it is a cylinder head

  • 502 Ramjet...

  • sick game if ur into cars

  • spark plug firing order on a chevy 350 is 18346972. always has been always will be. from joe shmoes 72 nova to my 96 tahoe. lengendary engine. fux wit it

  • @Deciblaster whether you're correct or not just shut the fuck up. seriously. people like you are the reason that Europeans don't like us Americans. there are advantages to every type of setup on the market, and everyone can run what they want. car enthusiasts should be able to have a normal conversation with other car enthusiasts without trying to argue that their shit is better just because they're not familiar with the other person's/country's engineering. now get that sand out of your vagina.

  • I just watched videos of wankel and other rotary engines.  Dear goodness this is complex by comparison.

  • American engines, in my opinion, seem designed to work well, but they usually aren't the extraordinary feats of engineering that are quite often seen in import cars. Henry Ford's philosophy was to put a car in the hands of every American (or something like that), and to that end, for many years American engines have been fairly inexpensive and pretty decent. I would personally prefer more focus on refinement, high efficiency, and high reliability.

  • Now take the oil pan back off and put the oil pump and pickup tube on before you start that engine.

  • Tuned prot injection...this is my camaro motor I believe....

  • faso eu consigo fazer 5 desi em um dia

  • LOL no oil pump or pickup in it :P

  • the small block chevy this is for the haters this engine has won more championships than any other is in more forms of racing than any other and in grass roots racing is THE DOMINATE engine they are cheap to build and reliable hard to kill little engines all u ricer guys talkin about i have 500hp in my 4 banger they fail to tell u its all turbo causts a small fortune and is near the brink of being a bomb and with one of these small blocks u can make 500hp for less than ricer boys turbo

  • a dinosaur

  • Sorry for my beginner comment, but where are the camshafts? I cannot see them. 

  • @jamcliff999 this is a small block chevy and there is only one and it is in the block

  • @jamcliff999 The camshaft was the 2nd stick that went over the crank...the top gear on the timing chain was connected to it...

  • no me gusto

  • have you see the video of the diesel motor 2 strokes by valves only? who built this engine can learn something, pls check it.

  • incrivel!!!!!!

  • 180 HP, same as 4 cyl european engines

  • At what revs though, these beasts have loads of OOMF at the lower rev range. Don't need to hit 6,0000 RMP to get the same BHP

  • look at this horse shit american engine.

  • Comment removed

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack A chevy v8 powered the car that won lemans. Yes i suppose americans make horseshit engines, the only thing horseshit about this video is your horseshit comment.

  • @KristoffersonPT after 60 years of development you'd hope it could do SOMETHING worthwhile

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack i suppose that the engines that all easily last 60 years too isnt an accomplishment either.

  • @KristoffersonPT which engines "easily last" for 60yrs? There is no 'easily' and there is no one 'engine' designed for 60yrs of service. However a company can be cheap and uninnovative enough to keep making an engine series for that amount of time...

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Ive got a 1953 chevy truck with a 283 that has 345k miles on it and still going strong.

  • @KristoffersonPT thats kind of low miliage for a 53 thats not original miles i assume thats rebuilt miles not being a ass try getting 100k miles then it will be a god

  • @KristoffersonPT

    thats when cars were made out of metal and engines were made out of cast iron, not like the crap we call "cars" today

  • @KristoffersonPT I call BS on that, the 283 wasn't even available until 1957 I don't doubt that a 283 is capable of that but at the very least that's not the original engine

  • @esfreerider yeah its a different engine that my father put in the truck when he owned it, but that was in 58-59 dont remember. The engine does have 345k miles on it and the body about 80k more.

  • @KristoffersonPT I'm real proud of ya.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack you're dumb...sbc is the shit...look at the race winners....they ride chevy motors....Hell, i know plenty of mustangs here in indy that have 383's and 355's in them...

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Get out of here

  • @burnbabey12 lol i was until you replied and brought me back. thanks.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Nothing horse-shit about the Mighty Mouse. Notorious for reliability; cheaper and easier than dirt to find parts; potential for extreme HP and decent torque. Short stroke SBC's can also produce ridiculous RPM if setup correctly, some in excess of 10,000...

    Few other engines have such a reputation.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Yeah, because those K-Car engines that you are so fond of are the pinnacle of automotive engineering.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Fuck you red coat....we invented this shit...there's a reason you foreigners can't compete with American racing, especially GM in anything...lmao

  • @Deciblaster "red coat" what the fuck does that mean, how fucking old are you. What's american racing? NASCAR? driving around someay oval track with no driving skill required? dont you have a WW2 re-enactment to be at?

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Bitch, I am 23 fucking years old and I will burn any POS "turbocharged" nonsense you can afford with my 6,000$ monte carlo ss let alone my father's corvette if you really want to get froggy... You fucking foreigners always have to chime in with your snobby drivel about how "American stuff is garbage..."..Well, you seem to really enjoy running your cock sucker on American made Youtube right bitch? and I'm a yankee mother FUCKER...

  • @Deciblaster lol easy there, slugger

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack shit on you....go eat a crumpet shithead

  • @Deciblaster umad?

    ya, u mad. lol

  • @Deciblaster From an American perspective, I do have to say that you are an absolute douche, and a close-minded, brand-loyal jagoff like 80% of us are. Japan is an exception; they blow cock. But let's take a look at Germany. In the 1990's, BMW had their E36 M3, which was fitted with a naturally-aspirated DOHC 3.2L I6. It boasted 316 HP and 286 lb-ft of torque. Gas mileage was 18 city / 26 highway. They were also built to very high standards, and known to last very long.

  • @Deciblaster So equally, in the 1990's, Ford came out with the SOHC 4.6L V8. This produced 215 HP and 285 lb.-ft of torque. Fuel economy was rated 16 city / 22 highway by the EPA. These cars were also known to be made of cheap materials, and thus, didn't last very long under hard driving, at least without major repairs. This modular engine also ate head gaskets for breakfast. Corvettes of the same period used a 5.7L LT1 V8. They produced 300 HP and 330 lb-ft of torque...

  • @Deciblaster ...but also chugged gas; 15 city / 22 highway. And it could only seat 2 mid-sized people. Also, how exactly are turbos "POS"? Why, because they run off of the exhaust instead of a pulley (which adds strain and poorer MPG)? Because they don't have much of an effect on a lower-revving American car as they would a foreign car that redlines at 8,000? Tell me please, because I'm curious.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Jokesonyou. You don't see many European, Japanese, etc. cars that can use the same engine for both a heavy duty truck and a world class performance car. Ford GT uses an F-150 5.4L Modular, rapes everything. The Viper uses a V10 also used in the Ram for a while. The Vette used to use a 350 that has been used in basically all GM trucks and performance cars for almost 50+ years, and I could list a shit ton more. So yeah, have fun with your 1.5L 75 hp shitbox you call a car.

  • @tpops123 the joke? Ford Modular does what?

    watch?v=wYgPnENK6G0

    What you will witness here, are two turbocharged dragsters.

    The Mustang fitted with a boosted V8

    The Mazda converted RWD, using a built engine with stock, factory casted 2.3L block, head and crank. Both being built and boosted, one would naturally assume the 4 banger would lose in this race... right? Well, who survives in the end is not at all who you thought.

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack Sure every car can be beaten, but there's no replacement for displacement. Which one will most likely wear out first, crack, or whatnot from forced induction? The smaller 2.3L or the 4.6L? Also the 2.3L has to rev to produce any torque, while the 4.6L can produce it at lower RPM's and more steadily. If everything is casted in that Mazda, it's not going too long before nuking. And lastly, there's reasons why drag racing is mainly dedicated to large 'Murikan V8's.

  • @tpops123 Fair points, I just want to mention the production version of the DISI 2.3L produces 280+ft/lbs (underrated@wheels) at 2800rpm. With bolt ons upwards of 400+ft/lbs at 3000rpm. I believe it's the torquiest (@sub3500rpm) 4cylinder gasoline engine in production. They come with 4340 chromoly iron sleeves, forged crank, rods... Not all 4bangers or import engines are like Hondas with no torque until 7500rpm ;) If I ever did a domestic SBC or SBF, it would have ARAO 4valve heads

  • @OverlyExcitedNewJack dude just be quiet everybody hates you just go watch something else and everybody else shut the hell up about o this sht will beat this shit and blah blah o and yea i know i spelt some stuff wrong so stop being like most youtubers who can ony dis people cuz of spelling fuck faces and honestly i agree with you OverlyExcitedJack foreign engines r betta and all u other people dont come at me sayin some crap like name one foreign engine i barley look at that just the cars

  • até aqui tu ta deus me livre

  • i not see the bujias?

  • Comment removed

  • It is not a valid argument to say "You can't say bla bla bla as an American." It makes you sound inbred. 500 horsepower does kick ass. But the way to achieve it is not by adding countless cubic centimeters to a shitty design. And pushrods are a shitty design. At the very least a modern Otto-cycle engine should be DOHC. If anything, valves should be solenoid-based by now.

  • @EminencePhront Solenoid really.... Ya um buddy that will make the motor even less reliable and push rods are more reliable. Solenoids can have electrical problems there goes a valve then maybe a backfire into the intake manifold. Or busting a valve on a piston. Over head cams aren't as reliable you break the timing chain or belt there goes a couple valves and pistons and possibly a head. Us americans get get over 750hp 351 cubic inches N/A

  • @burnbabey12 YES SIR!!! GITTEM! lol

  • @EminencePhront I correct myself maximum of 358 cubic inches and I heard rumors of ford developing a motor that produces over 900hp.

  • @EminencePhront That's the beauty...We can make an old inefficient engine huge, and THEN add little girly turbos and things that go ZING...lol Let me know when you find a DOHC engine that goes 1/4 mile 3.33 seconds....Cause ya can't lol

  • how do to download ?

  • ls9

  • nice

    

  • Ultimate porn.  =D

  • advantages of pusrods: lighter and more compact, produces lots of low end torque, less complex drive system.

    disadvantages of pushrods: more drag on camshaft thus limits rpm, limited valves per cylinder,

  • forgot the oilpump

  • LOL! its using PUSHRODS! lmfao..... Shitty design.

  • @madjimms heard of a 427? dumbass....

  • @AdminsAnonymous 427ci yay.... Still shitty, Keep your ancient designs.

  • @madjimms Shitty design my ass!

  • @andrewlamb123 DOHC is a much more efficient design.

  • @madjimms but dohc engines ar boring cause they havent got power (drehmoment in Nm)

    dohc are weak but effectiv ^^ american v8 are still the best engines in the world and im from germany so i know what about dohc ;) (Suzuki Mechanic )

  • @xSykiax Too many V8's here in the US. US cars are junk.

  • @madjimms What The Fuck this can be right why do you dont like US cars nothing is better than a powerful V 8 . you cant say as an american V 8 is junk

  • @xSykiax You just don't get it, Lazy Americans build extra 4 cylinders to COMPENSATE for poor design. Why the fuck does anyone need 500hp?

  • @madjimms ok ok ok i got it ,you dont like the technic behind a v8 ok.

    but 500 ps aka hp are awsome you can drive very fast whith this cars, even in germany because there is no speed limit i dont know how it is in USA whit speedlimit. but did you ever drive a 2.0l dohc engine 122 cui hope thats right.. you fall asleep when you drive in the 2 gear a hill up and wont get over 25 mph cause the engine is so damn weake small engines are powerless and thats why i love v8alsways enough power

  • @xSykiax a 2.0 DOHC gets up hills just fine, my Volvo 240 Wagon with a 2.3L B230F went up hills (fully loaded rear) with 110hp no problem & I had plenty of fun with it. If I added a turbo it would have gotten better fuel economy while making (possible) 100% more power.

  • @madjimms ok guess your right whith a turbo with enought load pressure even a dohc 2 l engine is enough..... for normal driving and its more efficent than a v 8 ....

  • @madjimms So, you make fun of v8's for making serious pwoer out of a mere 350CC...yet you talk of turbos...Shoving cold air into a the cylinders like THAT is so much more scientific..lmao...Just because you don't know how to build/run a real motor doesn't make your poopy ass volvo the shit...Hell, my bay 305 with nothing but bolt ons would run your volvo until it exploded...SBC motors produce upwards of 10K rpms if put together properly...

  • @madjimms US cars are the best selling automobiles in the world...You just don't knwo how to use them.... Like I said up there...let me know when you find a non-pushrod engine that does 1/4 mile in 3.33 seconds....Cause ya can't

  • @Deciblaster You need to brush up on cause vs. correlation. I think you're missing a few pieces of the puzzle...

  • @xSykiax SOHC = Low end torque and DOHC = High end torque

  • @David20931 SOHC is the best in germania we only got DOHC and this engines are crap you need more than 6500 rpm t o get a liitle bite power.. in USA you just kich down on a v 8 engine and you gonna fly ^^ love V 8 ;)

  • @xSykiax yeah i drive a car which is DOHC and it doesnt have power unless i put my foot all the way down even then it sounds like its going to blow up due to high RPM lol

  • @David20931 amen brother finaly someone who say the truth ;)

  • @madjimms ill give you that but for someone to call a pushrod engine a "shitty" design is just ignorant.

  • @andrewlamb123 Instead of focusing on 4 cylinder efficiency, some guy said "Hey lets add 4 more cylinders to extract more power!" Rather than focusing on making each cylinder more precise & powerful.

  • @madjimms What you mean to say is...."I don't like torque, it scares my vagina".....lmao..They added cylinders to get more pulling power....Horsepower isn't shit in this country if you can't get to it in time...

  • @Deciblaster Why would someone need more than 100hp? please explain.... Driving across town to work doesn't require any more (in fact you can do fine with 40hp) Why have more power & not better fuel economy? Instead of adding extra cylinders, why not make those 4 cylinders twice as efficient?

  • y q paso con la bonba de aseite 

  • very very nice

  • @chamote A diesel engine does not have spark plugs. The compressed (hot) air at the top of the 2 stroke is injected with diesel fuel and ignites. Instead of a fuel intake valve, a diesel engine has an air intake valve and an exhuast valve.

  • How a diesel motor with no spark plugs has what it appears to be an ignition??.

    (at 1:44)

  • @chamote this isnt a diesel motor... Also, some diesels have glow plugs, and they can sometimes look like the ignition system on a gas motor

  • Fuck single cam and push rod design was gay.

  • @Wrulol it's not 'gay' its just outdated by today's standards. Take pride in engineering past, it shapes the future. besides, these engines are still made and capable of massive power.

  • @Wrulol I dont understand why people hate on pushrods.....Do you not like Torque at all?

  • And the sbc is still physically smaller and more powerful than the ohc v6's out there

  • Pushrod FAIL

  • any way i can have this as a screen saver?

  • But! will it blend??

  • hahaha now thats comedie!

    

  • chyba zapomnial o swiecach...

  • @grubby2207 chyba że to jednostka wolnossąca geniuszu

  • @Mahhu89 o ile wiem to silnik wolnossacy to silnik bez doladowania a nie bez swiec. jesli sie nie myle jest to silnik typu V8 HEMI geniuszu... :)

  • @Mahhu89 a poza tym jest aparat zaplonowy ale bez kabli i bez swiec.

  • mechanic is just beautiful

  • Great! Interesting! You do not hear the sound ... or maybe there is! Why not try to add the music of independent artists, find it on .jamendo.com. I did it!

  • thumbs up if you wish putting a motor together was that easy XD

  • It's a carburetor dumass not file injected

  • @ghost90able no this is FI not carbbed

  • @ghost90able well i should hope its not file injected that would ruin ur engine haha :P

  • what component physically "injects" the fuel

  • @ratmphan the fuel injector pump

  • @ratmphan fuel injectors controlled electronically. in this case they are placed in the intake ports right before the intake valves. more modern engines have direct injection where the injector's inject fuel directly into the cylinder, hope this helps and is accurate.

  • @need2speed94 difference... is indirect injection and direct injection (into cyclinder)

  • @ratmphan The carburator does that. Don't listen to some of the idiots here.

  • @ratmphan the fuel injectors physicly inject the fuel. the injectors may be electronicly controlled to when they inject the fuel.

  • sajna ez 50 éve sem volt modern blokk.......

  • This engine is outdated an age ago. Nobody uses "over-head valve" sistem these days. It wastes power and fuel. Now almoast all cars uses "DOHC", or double overhead camshaft.

  • @guntis - If you lived in America and could experience the eyeball flattening torque of a pushrod V-8, you wouldn't say that at all. :)

  • @guntis666 that is still an over head valve design everyone uses over head valve systems now days besides some small engine makers im pretty sure briggs and stratton still make flathead motors known as a under head valve design your thinking of under head cam design and chevrolet still uses it in the ls series motors and i believe most big diesels still use an underhead cam not completely sure on that though

  • How can you Click on this video and hit the Dislike button? DIDNT THEY READ THE DANG TITLE?

  • I believe this is a GM LS series engine.

  • @cichlidkeeper89 Its got a OHV pushrod, how old is that thing?

  • @Beef1188 Probably not all that old. I believe that my friends 2002 Ls1 is a pushrod engine. They used them for a while.

  • @cichlidkeeper89 I got 90' opel kadett and I don't have pushrod anymore. :)

  • @Beef1188 Even many new Dodge and Chevy engines are still using pushrod. They can't seem to break away from the technology. NASCAR is stilling using pushrod - you'd think in the racing industry they'd want to switch to 4 valves per cylinder.

  • @EngineeringExplained Yeah, well, americans did allways have a "if its not broke, don't fix it" mentality.

  • @Beef1188 Hahaha, hence our engines are still using technology that became outdated in the fifties...

  • @EngineeringExplained How else are you gonna explain it?

  • Thanks for the great tutorial!  Visit the NXTutorials website for more cool tutorials on NX 8.

  • thanks 4 video

  • Where is the rest of the parts, I thaught you would show how the inside of all the working parts?

  • I never seen a altanator go where you have it, usually the power-steering-pump gose there and the altanator gose on the other side on the top. Just never seen it like that on a car or truck before.

  • It is a four bolt-main motor so it would have to be for a Vette or a Truck.

  • You know something it does have that hole on the top, so it must be from like the late 90s and up.

  • It must be from the late 80s or early 90s, multi-port fuel-injection. Possibly a Vette-Motor.

  • @1BlubeTube I believe it is the small block TPI used in the camaros and corvettes of the early 90's.

  • After seeing the oil-pan, it has to be.

  • It actually looks like a small-block 350 Chevy Engine.

  • Its probaly has a virus or something, its just one of those videos to get people to click on it. However, nice video of the motor, eventhough its a diesel I guess, I hate diesel engines but nice video.

  • great use of engine builder

  • Never mind vaginal childbirth. Why does YT think Colonic Irrigation is related???

  • Please visit the NXTutorials website for more cool tutorials on NX 8.

  • That would've take atleast a day or two to CAD, well done...kudos

  • wrong dizzy for the TPI engine

  • Um...forget the oil pump? fail

  • Hey, i saw only 1 camshaft in a cylinder.... so its a SOHC?

  • @SaabyHun97 its not an overhead cam desighn, one camshaft pushes on pushrods moveing the rockerarms. so yes its a single cam

  • Can someone tell me the easiest way to find the firing order of the pistons??

  • @Adriangrosvenor This is when you look from front the right side of the engine is 1,3,5,7 on the left side it is 2,4,6,8 very simple its much more easy on V8 then it is on a l4

  • @awesomepat Yes, but not all vehilcles operate on the same exact firing order. Some are  1432, each carrying a different firing order. But lets say I don't have the actual firing order from the manufacturer but I already know that two pistons move in the same direction up while two move down, (in the case of a 4 cylinder engine) how do I identify which piston is on the power stroke first, second, third, etc. That i can know the firing order. Is their a way to tell by the valves

  • @awesomepat because I don't actually know the firing order of this vehicle I bought. Also how can I work out the compression ratio of the engine? is their a simple way for me to do this? Original the engine is a 1liter engine (1000cc) but am looking at making the pistons increase compression. So this is why I need a simple way to figure out the firing order before i proceed.

  • @Adriangrosvenor The first cylinder in front is always number one in firing order! well look it up in wiki.....look for firing order is much more easy!

  • forgot the oil pump. BOOM

  • This amination remember me of an old game called Street Rod, that we can see the engine like that.

  • the main thing is it is a autodesk and i think he had to draw the objects if you guys think you can do better make a better drawing and dont make a jerk of yourselves