Mathematical junk!!! The physical significance of tensor and principal axes has been totally ignored. I wasted 2 hours on this lecture and the prelude to to this.
it seems that way since you are integrating mass. However, consider if you wanted to actually perform the integration. One would have to integrate the rigid body's mass which can be done succinctly with rho*dV to replace dm. This takes it to three dimensions. Yet, this actual step is unnecessary for what he is trying to show.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Just Some evidence WTC demolished using explosives! 0 WT7 Fell at free fall speed 0 2ndry explosions caught on cam B4 collapse 0 Squibs seen at reinforced points of Towers 0 Lobbys of Towers destroyed B4 collapse 0 No resistance put up by 80,000 Tons of structural steel 0 No evidence of Pancaked floors 0 Molten Metal Found At ALL 3 Towers 0 Giant Steel Columns Blasted Hundreds of Feet Away 0 Fires Burned for Months 0 1100 Bodies missing Can Gravity do this? NO!
Very concise. Thank you
Menaurdi 1 month ago
to those who think they wasted their time watching this: it must really suck to be you!
120551DS0u2a 10 months ago
Excellent teacher.
italouruguayricano 10 months ago
thank you!
deva00voli00rodu 1 year ago
Mathematical junk!!! The physical significance of tensor and principal axes has been totally ignored. I wasted 2 hours on this lecture and the prelude to to this.
ajetebharath 1 year ago
thanks Apu
made4life22 1 year ago 2
very lucid. very enjoyable. I look forward to learning much more from you.
MrMillsms 1 year ago
Great explanation, simple, clear and not shallow and developed the ideias. No comparison!
arantheo 1 year ago
thank you very much techer
lukealucard 1 year ago
Thank you Professor Amitabha Gosh! This is a very clear lecture, with an excellent presentation.
Regards,
AK
Gordane3 2 years ago
Wow, it's a masterpiece! I like the way he introduced the tensor concept. At vid time approx. 36 min, shouldn't it be single integral, not triple?
aibiman8 2 years ago
@aibiman8
it seems that way since you are integrating mass. However, consider if you wanted to actually perform the integration. One would have to integrate the rigid body's mass which can be done succinctly with rho*dV to replace dm. This takes it to three dimensions. Yet, this actual step is unnecessary for what he is trying to show.
MrMillsms 1 year ago
Comment removed
ObeyBunny 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
TruthLogic 2 years ago
You had me at "rotation about a point".
Snoopies622 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I made it to 3:05 DID I WIN?!
tehfrawg 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oh yes thank you great explaining GUESS WHATT EVERYBODY WIL FALL SLEEP IF WTTHCING THIS
KKCamaron 3 years ago
Thank you.. GReat lecture. very precise.
EdgeStormcrow 3 years ago 2
thanks for posting really appericiated!
LTF85199 3 years ago 2
excellent lecture
rahimoonsaga 3 years ago
Thanks, nice lecture, I was looking for information about this topic. I have to go through again though, but it seems very nice organized.
cano3d 3 years ago