katzeklo you are a good uploader the language i like is malay i never knew malay is in this video thanks the moive i like better is tarzan diney thanks for posting this on youtube
Even if Dingo copied disney, it doesn't matter. Disney copied it in the first place.
In fact, the only disney animation I can think of off hand that isn't copied are the mickey mouse ones and even then I'm not entirely sure. Just try and find one that wasn't copied.
@Katzeklo I do realize that. I'm just pointing out the fact that it doesn't matter that Dingo isn't as good as Disney. Disney isn't as good as the original either.
@gomagicalmina Okay, but what would you consider the original? The book by Burroughs? I wouldn't compare the book to the movie, as the movie is clearly just loosely based on the original story and intended for a different target group.
@Katzeklo That is what I would consider to be the original as a matter of fact. I'm glad that they at least mentioned the original in the credits (for once).
Unfortunately, not that many people watch the credits. Ergo barely anyone knows that this isn't an original storyline.
@gomagicalmina Disney movies aren't copied-they pay for the rights to depict and interpret famous fairy tales, books, or folklores in a manner they want to. The only one with some controversy as to if Disney infringed too much on a pre existing story without properly giving it credit is the Lion King. Disney creates new characters for their versions and makes them original. Tarzan stems from an ancient legend/rumor. Any print version is, technically, a copy. Enjoy the retelling.
@gomagicalmina well personally , disney introduced me to the original stories which i never would have discovered if it werent for disney, plus almost all of there movies (except lelo and stitch and the emperors new groove) are all based comepletely on folk law alladin wasnt a copy of the king of bagdad it was an original story from the arabian nights
@gomagicalmina If it was that much of a problem, the Tezuka estate would have sued Disney by now. And really, a show that no one other than a select few have seen? How would people know that it was a ripoff of that show? Do you have to attack Disney movies, which CAN be enjoyable in their own right, simply because they allegedly "ripped off" a Tezuka anime?
@gomagicalmina Well, it just shows how awesome Disney is. When Disney rips off someone, they do it with gorgeous animation, beautiful music, and an epic story. When others do it (like Dingo here) it looks like 3 year olds doodled it. Besides, if we're gonna talk rip offs let's be fair here. I love Disney and Tezuka very much but have you seen Tezuka's Princess Sapphire? She looks like Snow White with tights and a sword
I guess that its good that disney can actually animate things properly as opposed to some companies. Still, I wish people wound stop calling it "the original". If they want to talk about originals, they should talk about the book.
Princess Sapphire may look like Snow White but the plot is different. Besides, her appearance isn't ripped off at all. A lot of girls in old animes have short black hair (take Uran from Astroboy) and the costume is a similar style since its from the same time period.
@gomagicalmina From what I know of Kimba (Which isn't much mind you) the plot of Kimba is very different from The Lion King as well. for example, Simba never once talked to humans.
Yeah, Sapphire's look is actually pretty standard for the time. But Tezuka was known to lift from Disney for his style a lot. So as far as I'm concerned, we've just come full circle
They stole the characters and many of the scenes. They didn't steal all of it (since its too long) but they stole pretty much everything they thought would make a good movie. Scenes like Kimba talking to humans are taken out. They have scenes like his father talking from the sky, surpassing his father to become king, eating grass, etc...
True I suppose. I guess we're even since I don't know much about Tezuka.
@gomagicalmina In most cases yes. But Tezuka did actually make his own mangas directly based on Disney films. Bambi for example. They're hard to find as they were only released in Japan but they're out there. The only REAL difference is that when Tezuka lifted from Disney, he admitted it. It would be nice if Disney did the same, but being DISNEY they probably fear Tezuka demanding hordes of money if they admit it and you know how Disney gets about that.
@gomagicalmina One difference of course is that Disney has the approval of Edgar Rice Burroughs' estate. Unlike a lot of literature from the lat 19th/early 20th century, the Tarzan stories have -not- fallen into Public Domain status.
@gomagicalmina Lilo and Stitch Brother Bear Toy Story The Three Caballeros UP Wal-e The Love Bug Dumbo Fun and Fancy Free The Reluctant Dragon Bambi The Emporers New Groove Cars Tron The Rescuers The Lion King Honey I Shrunk the Kids Petes Dragon (for starters)
Brother Bear - Though technically original (I think) the plot reminds me slightly of Touching Spirit Bear, a novel that was released about two years before. Not copied but not entirely original. The story is also like to a folk story that I've heard before although I can't use it as an example since I forgot the name
Toy story/WAL-E/Cars/UP - are Pixar
The reluctant dragon - 1898 children's story by Kenneth Grahame
Pete's dragon - Similar to My Father's Dragon (1948)
The Rescuers - Based on The Rescuers (1959) and Miss Bianca (1962) by Margery Sharp. I've read the latter a few years ago.
Bambi - Bambi: Eine Lebensgeschichte aus dem Walde, (1923) The title is German. it means Bambi: a Life in the Woods. (I love being able to read German somewhat). By Felix Salten I believe.
The Love Bug/Tron/Honey I Shrunk the Kids - Live action. I mean completely animated.
The Emperors new Groove - Many of the motifs are based off of the Inca empire
Lilo and Stitch - I have seen a couple films about a kid making friends with an alien or something similar. The first that comes to mind is E.T.
Dumbo - You have bested me on this one. I KNOW I have heard a story a lot like this but I can't quite place the name. I have, however, heard other stories about discrimination but that isn't enough so I will allow you that one until I remember it.
As to the other 2, I already said that ones with Mickey and his friends were original.
@gomagicalmina Adaptations aren't necessarily copying. Just tellings of a certain story. What Dingo and others do is copypaste Disney character designs and bits of their storytelling. The Thai ripoffs, they go for awful remakes.
Also, more recent stuff, but Lilo and Stitch, Emperor's New Groove , Bolt, and soon Reboot Ralph are all original Disney concepts. Then you have original gumbos like Lion King (Kimba, Bambi and Hamlet) or Atlantis (Verne and 20s Atlantis conspiracies about crystals)
True. I suppose thats what I mean then. Some are rip offs, but most are just adaptations.
I'm glad that they've been doing more original things recently.
I still think that they think that should give credit more.
I always thought that Atlantis was suspiciously similar to Castle in the Sky (which was an adaption by Hiyao Miyazaki) but I guess that what you said is more probable.
@gomagicalmina Surprised you didn't say Nadia. People keep insisting that's the case on Atlantis when the plots beyond a Verne inspired expedition to Atlantis and coincidentally similar character designs are completely different. Though it was hilarious when a official, but outsourced, Disneyland documentary briefly talking about plans for an Atlantis themed sub ride accidentally uses that comparison collage as a background.
@GranitePlox It's just the name Simba sounds like Kimba. I have seen Kimba, the show and movies are very different from the Disney version. Plus Disney did not slightly change Simba's name based on Kimba. Simba means Lion in Swahili.
@gomagicalmina It does matter. And it's not copying, it's an adaptation. Saying it's not an original story is more accurate. They still put in a lot of effort and creativity to retell and design it. The new characters they came up with based on the original ones are very much their own and their characterization of Tarzan and Jane is a very different take. To say they copied it implies they didn't add any creative input and lugs it in the same heap as Dingo, which is total injustice.
Their Hunchback of Notre Dame ripoff was worse than this, due to the inability of everyone at Dingo Pictures to draw a straight line (for buildings). At least with a forest you don't have that issue! :P
you do realize that disney wasnt the original right? they are all based off an old tv series and moviesbut yeah the dingbats version looks stupid but what year was it made you also have to take that in account,which came first is very important
@emo102492 Of course I know ... This video is, however, not a statement about the story but about the animation quality "Disney vs. Dingo". Easy as that.
@emo102492 Oh, and the Dingo versions of Disney-movies are ALWAYS made shortly after the Disney versions are published. Usually in the same year or a year later. The intentions behind Dingo Picture's movies and release dates should be obvious. You don't really thing Disney is copying Dingo Pictur's movies/storylines? lmao ...
@Katzeklo i know i just wanted to know when the release date was,i dont bother with shows that have very terrible artwork,no meaning of offense was ment just never heard of dingo before,well maybe on icarly makeing fun of disney but never that theres an actuall dingo
actually the audio from dingo/phoenix productions is the most awfull i've heard. If you wanna laugh really bad, go watch the dingo clips..its so awfull its funny
Ever saw something so terrible, that creating a word to describe it's level of SUCK would merely take way from the suck-intensity that is already there?
First off, 1:27 What the hell are Warner Brothers characters doing in the middle of this shit-hole?
Second, 1:32 I think he died from a major bout of constipation that caused his bowls to explode. That would explain the frusterated look on his face and the fact that he looks like he's standingwhile he's laying there. LOL ^^
Second, 1:32 I think he died from a major bout of constipation that caused his bowls to explode. That would explain the frusterated look on his face and the fact that he looks like he's standingwhile he's laying there. LOL ^^
Hey, more logic fail! A gorilla cannot lie down straight like that, right?
I'd give you points, but if we found all the logic fails in Dingo's version, we'd be here all day ;-)
"Dearly beloved, we gather here today to say our goodbyes to Ker--" (Dingo glares) "--KONchak. No one knows why he died, but judging from the look on his face, one can assume an enema was forced up his ass--" (Dingo throws stones) "ALL RIGHT! Hediedanobledeathprotectinghisfamilyfromthesadisticwildcat! Gotta go, bye!"
That's probably how the Dingo sponsored funeral went...
The sad thing is that Dingo Picture's version of Tarzan appears to be one of its better-animated cartoons. Compared to the likes of Animal Soccer World this almost looks fluid...almost.
I will say this about Dingo, their films have an odd, homely quality that reminds me of those old 'animated storybook' shorts (for anyone here old enough to remember them.)
That said, I can't believe for a second these people give a damn about what they're doing. That's why I can't see this as a wholly unfair comparison... they may be amateurs on a shoestring budget; but they seem to lack even the most basic ambition any animator should. Besides, most people would eventually GET BETTER.
Yep, me too. I got so distracted by the malay/indo version of the song, that i didn't gross pay any attention to the Dingo animation (or at least, i didn't LMAO cuz of the song). And is the vocal for the malay/indo version is Phil Collins too? cuz that doesn't sound like his voice in my ears.
The plane crash in the beginning reminds me of those airline safety cards. XD Incidentally, most airline safety cards are artistically superior to and more dramatic than a Dingo Pictures production.
In a few hours I'll be boarding a plane, and when I see the safety card I'll think of this. Let's hope the association with Dingo doesn't curse my flight. :P
Wow! I couldn't tell the difference - The first one to show was Disney though, wasn't it? Such good work... are you sure they weren't all scenes from the same movie?
All of these Dingo animations have a weird software glitch where the foreground gets cut off on the edge and shows the background through, it's really distracting.
It's not flashy animation, it's quality animation. Disney's Tarzan is better because they spent money and time to make it visually engaging. The Dingo Pictures version doesn't portray real emotions anywhere near as well as Disney's does.
Do flashy animation and expensive sound really make a better movie? I would enjoy the Dingo movie just as much if not more.
The Disney film is so much more of an expensive product which makes it much more artificial and less convincing when it comes to conveying real emotions.
Oh, because something cost a lot of money to make, it's somehow fake and inferior. Brilliant logic!
Disney's is superior by bloody light-years BECAUSE they put money into their product. The godawful animation in the Dingo version looked like it was done by a third-grade art class.
Dude, are you serious? The amount of money Disney poured into Tarzan allowed them to hire professional voice actors, musicians, and animation staff. Unlike music, amateur animators rarely ever match the work of the pros.
katzeklo you are a good uploader the language i like is malay i never knew malay is in this video thanks the moive i like better is tarzan diney thanks for posting this on youtube
J2ycob20 1 week ago
I have to go and watch this now ^_^ The Disney one, I mean.
RazinBlastroth 3 weeks ago
Please, book version is best version.
EnmityOfHate 1 month ago
Fake tarzan looks like some cheap animated short on the internet.
DrGnockerz 1 month ago
i LOL'D AT THIS.
snowhiteo 1 month ago
I guess iCarly wasnt kidding...
TheSonomaDude 2 months ago
Im feeling rather nostalgic now :I
BecauseGenitals 2 months ago
Disney is always better
unicornzarecool 3 months ago
DISNEY!!! AMAZING! Flawless animation and Beautiful music. NO COMPARIZON! END OF CONVERSATION!
Fairytaleprincexy 3 months ago
.......i seriously think i could do a better job then dingo pictures in paint and windows movie maker......if i wasn't so lazy and had time to do it.
paranoidsciocco 4 months ago
@ 2:06 Whoa, fake-Tarzan is PACKIN'!
microwiz 5 months ago
Press 6 to see awesomeness repeatedly.
AlexFolland 5 months ago
2:10 Best. Scene. Ever!
StarSnowGhost 6 months ago
"hey Terk!"
ryonagana 6 months ago
Dang Tarzan is one sexy character
CabbageUnicorns 7 months ago
wait why does that gorrilla have a tail ? gorrillas dont have tails
this is blasphemy aaarrrrggggg
raptorhunter104 7 months ago
Never knew there was a Malay cover of that song.
ZephyrinSkies 9 months ago
1:26 oh gawd! look! it's Simba!
bune88 1 year ago
This was painful to watch, though the stories belong not to Disney but it's pretty clear they tried to copy some characters and imitate some scenes.
mazzyelf 1 year ago
I remember I got this one instead of the disney movie.. I was soo disappointed xD
PetieFr 1 year ago
the difference in quality is just...............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
mattakudesu 1 year ago
2:10 I died XD
LeaxoftheUnderworld 1 year ago
1:26 That lion looks a lot like Mufasa, doesn't it?
michaelsar12 1 year ago
People are stupid. The whole movie is rendered on the dvd player.
Qkumber1 1 year ago
1:26 Simba and Nala?!
VenusMy129 1 year ago
lol the Dingo one looks....... -.-"
TomboyCactus101 1 year ago
The Dingo version is kind of an insult to Tarzan in whole. The book, the Disney movie...
Heck, it even kind of insults me a little.
CrystalJupiter 1 year ago 7
Diese Fake-Version von Tarzan ist ja wohl der allergrößte Scheiß :S
Tarzan ist viel viel viel besser! >:D
Cooles Video ;)
Kannst du auch ein Vs.-Video über "Der Schatzplanet" machen? :D
lg ^^
XxBusisxX 1 year ago
You gotta love the drastic shifts in animation quality. It's pretty astounding.
10191927 1 year ago
honestly... I didn't like either of them...
WumWip 1 year ago
@WumWip Okay. Then you're weird.
xRedheadgirl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xRedheadgirl
tell me something i don't know...
WumWip 1 year ago
The fake version is a bit better than the others fake dingos pictures cartoons, but it's sucks fucking balls.
Disney version is way better !
Kraftwerk67 1 year ago
right im off to watch tarzan
chill579 1 year ago
Even if Dingo copied disney, it doesn't matter. Disney copied it in the first place.
In fact, the only disney animation I can think of off hand that isn't copied are the mickey mouse ones and even then I'm not entirely sure. Just try and find one that wasn't copied.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina This video is, however, not a statement about the story but about the animation quality "Disney vs. Dingo".
Katzeklo 1 year ago 21
@Katzeklo I do realize that. I'm just pointing out the fact that it doesn't matter that Dingo isn't as good as Disney. Disney isn't as good as the original either.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina Okay, but what would you consider the original? The book by Burroughs? I wouldn't compare the book to the movie, as the movie is clearly just loosely based on the original story and intended for a different target group.
Katzeklo 1 year ago 23
@Katzeklo That is what I would consider to be the original as a matter of fact. I'm glad that they at least mentioned the original in the credits (for once).
Unfortunately, not that many people watch the credits. Ergo barely anyone knows that this isn't an original storyline.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina Disney movies aren't copied-they pay for the rights to depict and interpret famous fairy tales, books, or folklores in a manner they want to. The only one with some controversy as to if Disney infringed too much on a pre existing story without properly giving it credit is the Lion King. Disney creates new characters for their versions and makes them original. Tarzan stems from an ancient legend/rumor. Any print version is, technically, a copy. Enjoy the retelling.
FemmeFatale909 1 year ago
@FemmeFatale909
want me to list some more?
- Atlantis = castle in the sky
- Aladin = The King of Bagdad
- Mulan = (actually I'm not sure which one to say because there are many movies like this)
and a few others that I don't remember.
I mean, they didn't copy per se, but the ideas aren't original.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina well personally , disney introduced me to the original stories which i never would have discovered if it werent for disney, plus almost all of there movies (except lelo and stitch and the emperors new groove) are all based comepletely on folk law alladin wasnt a copy of the king of bagdad it was an original story from the arabian nights
watermelon668 1 year ago
@watermelon668
not the story for Aladdin I meant the names.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina emperor new groove
Lysiam 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina
An adaption is not a copy. The only real Disney copy I can think of is "The Lion King".
Scamander 1 year ago
@Scamander
you would consider it an adaption even though it didn't give credit at all?
Atlantis is a rip off of castle in the sky. The difference is there are more disney-like characters.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina
Atlantis is actually based from Nadia: Secret of Blue Water, I believe. Haven't seen Nadia though. OR Castle in the Sky.
Why the hate against the Disney movies?
RocMegamanX 1 year ago
@RocMegamanX
Mainly because of their rip off of one of my favorite shows. Kimba the White Lion.
And maybe it could be based off of that but there are way too many similarities that make me think they ripped off castle in the sky too.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina If it was that much of a problem, the Tezuka estate would have sued Disney by now. And really, a show that no one other than a select few have seen? How would people know that it was a ripoff of that show? Do you have to attack Disney movies, which CAN be enjoyable in their own right, simply because they allegedly "ripped off" a Tezuka anime?
I haven't even SEEN Castle in the Sky either.
RocMegamanX 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina Well, it just shows how awesome Disney is. When Disney rips off someone, they do it with gorgeous animation, beautiful music, and an epic story. When others do it (like Dingo here) it looks like 3 year olds doodled it. Besides, if we're gonna talk rip offs let's be fair here. I love Disney and Tezuka very much but have you seen Tezuka's Princess Sapphire? She looks like Snow White with tights and a sword
Dragonrider1227 1 year ago
I guess that its good that disney can actually animate things properly as opposed to some companies. Still, I wish people wound stop calling it "the original". If they want to talk about originals, they should talk about the book.
Princess Sapphire may look like Snow White but the plot is different. Besides, her appearance isn't ripped off at all. A lot of girls in old animes have short black hair (take Uran from Astroboy) and the costume is a similar style since its from the same time period.
gomagicalmina 1 year ago
@gomagicalmina From what I know of Kimba (Which isn't much mind you) the plot of Kimba is very different from The Lion King as well. for example, Simba never once talked to humans.
Yeah, Sapphire's look is actually pretty standard for the time. But Tezuka was known to lift from Disney for his style a lot. So as far as I'm concerned, we've just come full circle
Dragonrider1227 1 year ago
@Dragonrider1227
They stole the characters and many of the scenes. They didn't steal all of it (since its too long) but they stole pretty much everything they thought would make a good movie. Scenes like Kimba talking to humans are taken out. They have scenes like his father talking from the sky, surpassing his father to become king, eating grass, etc...
True I suppose. I guess we're even since I don't know much about Tezuka.
Its more of a style thing though isn't it?
gomagicalmina 11 months ago
@gomagicalmina In most cases yes. But Tezuka did actually make his own mangas directly based on Disney films. Bambi for example. They're hard to find as they were only released in Japan but they're out there. The only REAL difference is that when Tezuka lifted from Disney, he admitted it. It would be nice if Disney did the same, but being DISNEY they probably fear Tezuka demanding hordes of money if they admit it and you know how Disney gets about that.
Dragonrider1227 11 months ago
@gomagicalmina No one really cares
ExuberantMarshmallow 9 months ago
@gomagicalmina One difference of course is that Disney has the approval of Edgar Rice Burroughs' estate. Unlike a lot of literature from the lat 19th/early 20th century, the Tarzan stories have -not- fallen into Public Domain status.
arnyjk 1 year ago 3
J0NDAWG100 10 months ago
@J0NDAWG100
Brother Bear - Though technically original (I think) the plot reminds me slightly of Touching Spirit Bear, a novel that was released about two years before. Not copied but not entirely original. The story is also like to a folk story that I've heard before although I can't use it as an example since I forgot the name
Toy story/WAL-E/Cars/UP - are Pixar
The reluctant dragon - 1898 children's story by Kenneth Grahame
Pete's dragon - Similar to My Father's Dragon (1948)
continued...
gomagicalmina 9 months ago
@J0NDAWG100
The Rescuers - Based on The Rescuers (1959) and Miss Bianca (1962) by Margery Sharp. I've read the latter a few years ago.
Bambi - Bambi: Eine Lebensgeschichte aus dem Walde, (1923) The title is German. it means Bambi: a Life in the Woods. (I love being able to read German somewhat). By Felix Salten I believe.
The Love Bug/Tron/Honey I Shrunk the Kids - Live action. I mean completely animated.
The Emperors new Groove - Many of the motifs are based off of the Inca empire
continued...
gomagicalmina 9 months ago
@J0NDAWG100
Lilo and Stitch - I have seen a couple films about a kid making friends with an alien or something similar. The first that comes to mind is E.T.
Dumbo - You have bested me on this one. I KNOW I have heard a story a lot like this but I can't quite place the name. I have, however, heard other stories about discrimination but that isn't enough so I will allow you that one until I remember it.
As to the other 2, I already said that ones with Mickey and his friends were original.
gomagicalmina 9 months ago
@gomagicalmina Actually, I take The Lion King back.
J0NDAWG100 10 months ago
@gomagicalmina Adaptations aren't necessarily copying. Just tellings of a certain story. What Dingo and others do is copypaste Disney character designs and bits of their storytelling. The Thai ripoffs, they go for awful remakes.
Also, more recent stuff, but Lilo and Stitch, Emperor's New Groove , Bolt, and soon Reboot Ralph are all original Disney concepts. Then you have original gumbos like Lion King (Kimba, Bambi and Hamlet) or Atlantis (Verne and 20s Atlantis conspiracies about crystals)
FigmentJedi 9 months ago 2
@FigmentJedi
True. I suppose thats what I mean then. Some are rip offs, but most are just adaptations.
I'm glad that they've been doing more original things recently.
I still think that they think that should give credit more.
I always thought that Atlantis was suspiciously similar to Castle in the Sky (which was an adaption by Hiyao Miyazaki) but I guess that what you said is more probable.
gomagicalmina 9 months ago
Comment removed
FigmentJedi 9 months ago
@gomagicalmina Surprised you didn't say Nadia. People keep insisting that's the case on Atlantis when the plots beyond a Verne inspired expedition to Atlantis and coincidentally similar character designs are completely different. Though it was hilarious when a official, but outsourced, Disneyland documentary briefly talking about plans for an Atlantis themed sub ride accidentally uses that comparison collage as a background.
FigmentJedi 9 months ago
@FigmentJedi You also have the Lion King that has strangely close comparisons to Kimba the White Lion, an old anime series as well.
GranitePlox 6 months ago
@GranitePlox It's just the name Simba sounds like Kimba. I have seen Kimba, the show and movies are very different from the Disney version. Plus Disney did not slightly change Simba's name based on Kimba. Simba means Lion in Swahili.
SaixLuver 4 months ago
@gomagicalmina They're not ripping off Tarzan, in fact, Tarzan is in the public domain.
philipmarie1854 5 months ago
@gomagicalmina It does matter. And it's not copying, it's an adaptation. Saying it's not an original story is more accurate. They still put in a lot of effort and creativity to retell and design it. The new characters they came up with based on the original ones are very much their own and their characterization of Tarzan and Jane is a very different take. To say they copied it implies they didn't add any creative input and lugs it in the same heap as Dingo, which is total injustice.
ZephyrinSkies 1 month ago
i seriously thought I was gonna throw up looking at the Dingo Pictures one X(
disneygothprincess 1 year ago
Where the hell did they get a plane in that century!? D:
Plood 1 year ago
It's hilarious seeing the superior animation of Disney to that....other thing. xD
It looked like Tarzan was a cardboard cutout swinging through the trees. xD
CrystalJupiter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2:10 oh my god
Seiseii 1 year ago
1.27 - that's fucking Simba in the background! WTF!
SuperMathsBeaver 1 year ago
The abysmal rip off really does make the Disney animation look stunning.
SuperMathsBeaver 1 year ago
notice how when Kala (which is also my name XD) finds Tarzan he doesn't have A SINGLE SCRATCH on him!!!!
FoolishTriplets 1 year ago
2:42 All aboard the fail boat!
XxRoseXXMoonxX 1 year ago
The Disney pictures is much, but soo much better than the dingo pictures... Sorry the next expression but dingo pictures on this versions sucks
kyaraborg 1 year ago
Their Hunchback of Notre Dame ripoff was worse than this, due to the inability of everyone at Dingo Pictures to draw a straight line (for buildings). At least with a forest you don't have that issue! :P
HerEyesWereWild 1 year ago
What's the difference?
hahaha, jk
HoukaiAmplifier1 1 year ago
The "fake tarzan" movie looks like a saturday morning cartoon.
ConteDeContis2 1 year ago
@ConteDeContis2 a saturday morning cartoon would usually have have better quality. This is a Sunday morning cartoon
onehundred10million 1 year ago
what kind of music is this? LOL "I compare Tarzan while unfitting music plays!"
feh2 1 year ago
@feh2 Êrrr... it is the original music from Disney's Tarzan. ... very unfitting indeed. ;P
Katzeklo 1 year ago 18
2:40 is this supposed to be a ship or a plane?XD
SusakeKes 1 year ago
The Disney films budget had a budget of $120m, making it the most expensive 2D animation of all time.
The Dingo film, on the other hand, looks as though it was made on 120 cents :D
jeremylogsax 1 year ago
Can you send me the Malay version of Two Worlds in full? I can't find it anywhere :(
pickleband 1 year ago
you do realize that disney wasnt the original right? they are all based off an old tv series and moviesbut yeah the dingbats version looks stupid but what year was it made you also have to take that in account,which came first is very important
emo102492 1 year ago
@emo102492 Of course I know ... This video is, however, not a statement about the story but about the animation quality "Disney vs. Dingo". Easy as that.
Katzeklo 1 year ago
@emo102492 Oh, and the Dingo versions of Disney-movies are ALWAYS made shortly after the Disney versions are published. Usually in the same year or a year later. The intentions behind Dingo Picture's movies and release dates should be obvious. You don't really thing Disney is copying Dingo Pictur's movies/storylines? lmao ...
Katzeklo 1 year ago
@Katzeklo i know i just wanted to know when the release date was,i dont bother with shows that have very terrible artwork,no meaning of offense was ment just never heard of dingo before,well maybe on icarly makeing fun of disney but never that theres an actuall dingo
emo102492 1 year ago
The original Disney movie wins hands down.
VideoFavorer 1 year ago
fake tarzan sucked ass lol
SpikyDane 1 year ago
nevermind
tigresuave11 1 year ago
gay movie that dingo pictuers and look at the backgrond at 0:7 and why looks that fake jane at 1:42 like wendy from peter pan ?
wolfgirl7001 1 year ago
@wolfgirl7001 i thoguht wendy 2! i was about 2 comment about that until i read urs LOL XD
PandaGirl912 1 year ago
Hahahah epic chest beating 2:38
mouseymousey02 1 year ago
I love 2:11, when Tarzan's just swinging along with Jane hanging there like a piece of luggage.
ZeldaQueen64 1 year ago
ooo my god the fake belle lokks like wendy from peter pan
wolfgirl7001 1 year ago
@wolfgirl7001 it's not belle, it's jane. Belle's in beauty and the beast o.o
PandaGirl912 1 year ago
@PandaGirl912 yeah i know type the wrong name sorry
wolfgirl7001 1 year ago
the original tarzan is soo great. the fake is STUPID!
Klotzerine 1 year ago
Lord of the Jungle is a Rip off from Tarzan and The Jungle Book.
MrCrashlover679 1 year ago
actually the audio from dingo/phoenix productions is the most awfull i've heard. If you wanna laugh really bad, go watch the dingo clips..its so awfull its funny
Silverneelsen 1 year ago
Half boat at 2:42
UltraTroopa 1 year ago
Hey, the Malaysian version of Two Worlds! Are you Malaysian?
FinaTeh92 2 years ago
did they rip off all the Disney classics seriously they need to be beaten for making such crap
hiei66d 2 years ago
This is like one of those ripoff picture coloring book artists decided to make a movie..
Dingo always disappoints me greatly.
NinjaMuffinMaster 2 years ago 3
DIsney Tarzan always looked to me like Weird Al with dreads.
DreadfulRay 2 years ago 3
Oh god, it's like Ratationg's ancestor! Dx
lizardlord4k 2 years ago 3
... yet the thing that pisses me off most in this is that tarzan's best gorilla buddy has a TAIL.
EMFY 2 years ago 4
Ever saw something so terrible, that creating a word to describe it's level of SUCK would merely take way from the suck-intensity that is already there?
This is one of those things. XD
Lorenzio88 2 years ago 2
First off, 1:27 What the hell are Warner Brothers characters doing in the middle of this shit-hole?
Second, 1:32 I think he died from a major bout of constipation that caused his bowls to explode. That would explain the frusterated look on his face and the fact that he looks like he's standingwhile he's laying there. LOL ^^
CalicoVall 2 years ago
Second, 1:32 I think he died from a major bout of constipation that caused his bowls to explode. That would explain the frusterated look on his face and the fact that he looks like he's standingwhile he's laying there. LOL ^^
Hey, more logic fail! A gorilla cannot lie down straight like that, right?
I'd give you points, but if we found all the logic fails in Dingo's version, we'd be here all day ;-)
MaDrEaMeR17 2 years ago 4
1:26.... Simba??
blueoctopede 2 years ago 3
Even in death, that monkey looked fucking FURIOUS
"Dearly beloved, we gather here today to say our goodbyes to Ker--" (Dingo glares) "--KONchak. No one knows why he died, but judging from the look on his face, one can assume an enema was forced up his ass--" (Dingo throws stones) "ALL RIGHT! Hediedanobledeathprotectinghisfamilyfromthesadisticwildcat! Gotta go, bye!"
That's probably how the Dingo sponsored funeral went...
MaDrEaMeR17 2 years ago 8
fuck the song...Its zainal abidin who sings da fuckin song
143bumblebee 2 years ago
The difference competent animators makes. The entire movie looks like a cutscene from an early-90s CD-ROM.
eruption257 2 years ago
ya, Like CD-I style animation. ^^
CalicoVall 2 years ago 2
No, that's an offence to CD-I.
Mesterius1 2 years ago 2
Naw, compared to Phenoix, the CD-I seemed to have Disney-like effort put into it.
And by Disney effort, I mean ameteur adobe flash effort.
But the CD-I's cutscenes are obviously superior compaird to garbage like THIS.
LadySpawn 1 year ago
The sad thing is that Dingo Picture's version of Tarzan appears to be one of its better-animated cartoons. Compared to the likes of Animal Soccer World this almost looks fluid...almost.
Presaea 2 years ago
I will say this about Dingo, their films have an odd, homely quality that reminds me of those old 'animated storybook' shorts (for anyone here old enough to remember them.)
That said, I can't believe for a second these people give a damn about what they're doing. That's why I can't see this as a wholly unfair comparison... they may be amateurs on a shoestring budget; but they seem to lack even the most basic ambition any animator should. Besides, most people would eventually GET BETTER.
Zycyzyx 2 years ago
Even in death, that monkey looked fucking FURIOUS
Thecatarattat 2 years ago 16
dingo pictures? more like dingus pictures if you ask me
dynamicdragon13 2 years ago 4
Yep, me too. I got so distracted by the malay/indo version of the song, that i didn't gross pay any attention to the Dingo animation (or at least, i didn't LMAO cuz of the song). And is the vocal for the malay/indo version is Phil Collins too? cuz that doesn't sound like his voice in my ears.
d36nc9 2 years ago
Nope, that's not Phil Collins, he "only" sang in 5 languages. =)
Katzeklo 2 years ago
Wow. This company is just like the guys that made Ratatoing. I forgot their names.
EnigmaEvocative 2 years ago 7
Bloody hell, my friend wasn't kidding when he said this made the CD-I animations look good ._.
InvaderChloemew 2 years ago 26
@InvaderChloemew
You know, I'd dare say that Tarzan LOOKS like it came from a CD-i game.
RocMegamanX 1 year ago
The rip-off studio's called Dingo Pictures, and I can clearly see why:
1) It's drawn by a bunch of dingos
2) This movie is literally a picture
Male12368 2 years ago 40
Oh, I see why they're called "Dingo Pictures", because watching their movies is like having your eyes eaten by dingoes!
Duvmasta 2 years ago 9
disney way better than diago
killergoku 2 years ago 2
Ugh! Terrible, terrible! Now I appreciate the beauty and complexity of Disney...
disciple1313x 2 years ago 2
Dude where did you get the soundtrack from?
Because I find it hard to look for this soundtrack that the other half is in malay/indonesia language
bobohead1988 2 years ago
As far as I can see this is the only footage of Dingo's tarzan on the net, they don't even list it on their own site!
EssJay00 2 years ago
Did some more checkling, they have a film listed as "lord of the jungle", could be either a Jungle book or Tarzan rip off.
Or maybe both.....
EssJay00 2 years ago
Jupp, Lord of the Jungle/ Herr des Dschungels is the Tarzan rip-off ^^
Katzeklo 2 years ago
Ah thanks for clearing that up.
Any chance of uploading the whole thing or a download link?
EssJay00 2 years ago
how do they get away with such horrid knockoffs
aWsOmEHiLLzgirl15 2 years ago
Oh c'mon. Gimmie a break. Those Dingo-Picture's pictures looks like some ginda freak and I don't know you guys but I think I saw Simba in here 1:26.
Gatyena 2 years ago
You are indeed correct. Also note the Bagheera clone to his left (or is that a recolour of Nala?)
Yes....
FalconFC 2 years ago
Dingo Pictures version wins Floating Branch And Disembodied Camel award.
artman40 2 years ago
Oh how intensly I hate these copies.
Absolutely no respect for the art!
Making money out of someone else ideas, thats all they do.
JokerishDish 2 years ago
The plane crash in the beginning reminds me of those airline safety cards. XD Incidentally, most airline safety cards are artistically superior to and more dramatic than a Dingo Pictures production.
In a few hours I'll be boarding a plane, and when I see the safety card I'll think of this. Let's hope the association with Dingo doesn't curse my flight. :P
Epesi 2 years ago 5
Hmmm. Can't quite tell the difference.
Kaplar1 2 years ago
Are you kidding me? The quality of DINGBAT Pictures is crappy. Looks like a 5 year old made the movie. Disney rules 100%.
AutumnMaidenDove 2 years ago 4
Hmmmm. Still not seeing it.
Kaplar1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You DO realize, of course, that Tarzan is based of an old 1914 novel, right?
wraithstaff 2 years ago
Yes, I DO.
You DO realize that the video is about the comparison of Disney quality and Dingo-Picture-Quality, not about the origins of the story, right?
Katzeklo 2 years ago 3
Obtw, I'm surprised the baby survived the crash somehow...
IIMayhewII 2 years ago 3
I LOL'd at the ending.
He's all "8O!!"
IIMayhewII 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
My Eyes!!!! They burn!!!!! ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Dragonarh 2 years ago
wow the dingo characters are all so stiff. and to those who can't tell the difference. Either your kidding around or never saw Disney's Tarzan
samiwantha 2 years ago 5
Hahhahaa
leannelovesserj 2 years ago
tarzan fucking owns
jesuslsmetal 2 years ago
I can't tell which is which
oraboros 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Psh. Phil Collins should have teamed up with Dingo Pictures instead :P
Deoceres 2 years ago
I dunno about everyone else, but I lul'd at the joke. :'D
IIMayhewII 2 years ago
Lol I forgot about this - at least someone realised I wasn't serious! :P
Deoceres 2 years ago
. . .
What the shit. I always took the great art of Disney movies as something granted... Now I know that I should be thanking them. A lot.
DarkHarpuia 2 years ago 6
Wow! I couldn't tell the difference - The first one to show was Disney though, wasn't it? Such good work... are you sure they weren't all scenes from the same movie?
RatbagMC 2 years ago 6
All of these Dingo animations have a weird software glitch where the foreground gets cut off on the edge and shows the background through, it's really distracting.
Komojo 2 years ago 2
Kind of hard to portray emotion when you don't have the budget to animate more than one facial expression.
TruKriegsaffeNo9 2 years ago 2
WHY does that baby gorilla have a TAIL?
Digeridude 2 years ago
It's not flashy animation, it's quality animation. Disney's Tarzan is better because they spent money and time to make it visually engaging. The Dingo Pictures version doesn't portray real emotions anywhere near as well as Disney's does.
Ulthar678 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do flashy animation and expensive sound really make a better movie? I would enjoy the Dingo movie just as much if not more.
The Disney film is so much more of an expensive product which makes it much more artificial and less convincing when it comes to conveying real emotions.
futoku 2 years ago
Oh, because something cost a lot of money to make, it's somehow fake and inferior. Brilliant logic!
Disney's is superior by bloody light-years BECAUSE they put money into their product. The godawful animation in the Dingo version looked like it was done by a third-grade art class.
pashmcdohl 2 years ago 9
Dude, are you serious? The amount of money Disney poured into Tarzan allowed them to hire professional voice actors, musicians, and animation staff. Unlike music, amateur animators rarely ever match the work of the pros.
bobknowsall 2 years ago 6