WTC 7 NIST Ignore Missing Column 20

[martinavizcomm]

Bodged demolition job.

This is why they had to wait until 5:20pm to do repair work on the charges.

I really believe WTC7 was supposed to go down with the twin towers, since no-one would have seen it amongst all the dust & crap from the twin towers.

You have to be a dumbass not to see this was a blatant inside job.

[GreatGungHolio]

See 'Ronan Point' for info.

[10thprestigeful]

TO MUCH EVIDENCE POINTS TO A SET UP I DONT CARE WHAT ANYONE SAYS WHY WAS THERMITE FOUND AT ALL 3 SITES AND WHY WERE THE BOMB SNIFFING DOGS REMOVED 2WEEKS BEFORE THIS TOOK PLACE?SO THEY COULD PLACE THE CUTTERS AND APPLY THE THERMITE IF THE DOGS WERE THERE THEY WOULD HAVE CAUGHT IT AS IT WAS BEING DONE COME ON PEOPLE YOU CANT BE THAT DUMB

[Galv140577]

Even with the contrast enhanced nothin is visible in the area where the black stripe is & around it the face of the building doesn't look is if it sags or anythin to suggest the black stripe is visible damage to the building. Looks more like evidence that this video is fake/doctored.

So where's the hole ?

I see the smoke but where's the fire?

[Dannavy85]

Well it wasn't controlled demolition you dumb ass conspiracy fuck!

[cancanbiker]

you want to know what caused such precise damage to "column 20"? Barometric bombs may very well be the answer to the destruction of the entire wtc complex.

[CACBCCCU]

Notice how absolutely no smoke comes from the black strip itself. That's how you can tell the black strip is behaving like a covering, not like damage.

[DarkwingScooter]

@CACBCCCU That is an interesting observation. I have long been interested in the possible presence/use of soundproofing materials.

To my knowledge there is very little data on the use and effectiveness of such materials in conjunction with explosives. Seeing as the absence of noise was the only piece of reasoning used to justify to completely ignoring explosive theories it is something that may warrant additional scrutiny.

May be a red herring though.

[CACBCCCU]

My mistake, the other video I mentioned was posted by someone else.

It might be interesting to juxtapose this footage with photos of the long black tarps later used on the nearby Deutchbank building.

[CACBCCCU]

Looks like a long black tarp. Same appearance as the tarps later draped over the Deutchbank tower.

BTW, I especially enjoyed your "What did 9/11 molten metal look like?" video, femr2.

[chegis1]

thanks!

[chegis1]

this is great! can you please give me a link to an unedited (actual news) version of this video, so I can show this to skeptics? (people who don't trust truther channels)

[JSSTyger]

Why don't I just start my own conspiracy and maybe rob these peoples banks? They don't believe in conspiracys so I'll get away with it!

[JSSTyger]

Why do people believe conspiracys don't happen?

The whole reason they are labeled "conspiracy" is because they are covert...they are under the radar. This is exactly why morons don't think they happen. The conspiracists were way too smart for these people.

[GurnSi]

In the world of the conspiracy theorist, coincidences or superficially "unusual" events never happen...

Fortunately I live in the real world, where I know they do.

One wonders whether the NeoCons actually help propagate this nonsense, so the real crimes they committed go ignored & unpunished...

[femr2]

The purpose of this video is to highlight that NIST have ignored the extent of the damage. Their report states that column 20 was damaged only for the top few floors, but that is incorrect, as the damage is evident much further down the facade.

This damage could make a significant difference to any model 'collape' behaviour, so I think it reasonable to pose the question 'Why have NIST ignored it?'

Your intimated insults won't be tolerated here, or on any of my video's.

[infoseeker264]

@femr2 Its not the only thing NIST ignored. They never even looked for explosives. All the eyewitness accounts of people, including firemen and police, and they never even looked into the use of explosive. Maybe they were afraid what they would have found.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@femr2

-

Going to write a paper on it? Seems like a possibly legitmaite point to make, so why has no one done is and why do you not want to?

[JSSTyger]

I want those prints. And I also want the structural drawings for the WTC north tower. The wrong drawings (architecturals) were released on purpose...to make dummies think we had the prints. I read prints every day...the architecturals are nothin but a cool view of the overall plan.

[skat3rsnakekpo]

ok i admit thats weird

however

if a government can cover up 9/11, manage to convince all the media and world scientists, etc.

why the hell would they be stupid enough to just rip out a single column that is easily seen? surely theyd blow the inner core, not an outer one.

[shanehoustein]

great work, once again!

[Skeptic121]

Great job finding this video of the south side and even greater job finding this "feature" or "anomaly." It is hard to believe this entire column 20 was ripped out by falling debris, leaving a smooth "hole' or "channel' behind.

Unless, of course, it had "help" in the form of demolition devices.

[femr2]

skeptic...Also watch the video response to confirm the column damage stretches all the way to the roof.

[JSSTyger]

A good video is the the GldBr VEOH video. Look closely at the top Right side and look at the SW corner. Puffs going from down to up

Pancaking is out the window because floors do not pancake upward

Column failure is out the window as well. Since the bottom is "gouged" (NIST/NYPD) at that corner...how then can that column be in compression? There is ZERO axial force on that column. Consequently, buckling is OUT THE WINDOW.

I'd like to see somebody try to explain this observation.

[tele544]

Yes that gldbr is a great video and one must view it on veoh. It has the best quality. one can even clearly see the squib flashes in bldg 7 and bldg 1 while they are collapsing. amazing evidence.

[femr2]

tele...grab the best quality versions from megaupload. Links in the description here:

watch?v=U8lrTy5mrZY

[TinyCoconut]

Are there any other photos or videos which confirm this damage?

[femr2]

tinycoconut...There is very little data on the south side.

I've referenced NIST in the about this video section "NCSTAR_1-9_Vol1, Ch 5, P168-173"

It does contain a few images, though it has only a single frame of this clip, unprocessed, and seemingly chosen at the point of maximum smoke obscuration (is that a word?)

I'll dig out some links to whatever is online.

[JSSTyger]

Any physics major can tell you theres no way you can take out an entire column like that simply by dropping a weight on top of it. 47 floors are tied into that sucker being it nice and upright. There is simply no way that column disappears completely like that without pulling the building down with it.

[LUKAvac2]

when smoke go away u can clearly see there is no big fire, and that first part of video where the building is all in smoke was made in photos and it look like there was lot of fire but it wasn't.

[Marech1984]

Good job! Everybody can see the damages done by explosions.