Personality Types

[monas]

your eyes are lovely shade of blue

[jjclassjj]

really informative and interesting

[staranjela]

some sweet info here

[NiePatrzSieTutaj]

2x2x2x2=16

[dovmarcu]

This is either occultism or mysticism,but not science.

[marcusmeaney]

@dovmarcu lol occultism or mysticism? Its General Psychology... /facepalm

[dovmarcu]

@marcusmeaney

The MBTI is pseudoscience.

Jung's theory of psychological type was not tested through controlled scientific studies.His methods primarily included clinical observation,introspection and anecdote - methods that are largely regarded as inconclusive by the modern field of psychology.Neither the Myers-Briggs nor the Jungian models offer any scientific,experimental proof to support the existence,the sequence,the orientation,or the manifestation of these functions.

[malkooth]

@dovmarcu You must be one of those behaviorist cocksuckers.

[dovmarcu]

@malkooth

I am a scientist!

[malkooth]

@dovmarcu Go give Steven Pinker a blow job then.

[malkooth]

@dovmarcu Go fuck yourself asshole. 

[dovmarcu]

@malkooth

You are a fucked asshole!

[WoodlandRavah]

What is this, I dont even...

Personality types, AKA another way of diagnosing people with psychological problems they dont have...

[Mal1234567]

@WoodlandRavah There may be correlations between personality types and certain psychological issues, but typology has never focused on the negatives. To say that the ENTJ is a leader is not negative.

[wookie37]

I will never be able to make sense of Ann Coulter!!! :) EVER.

[Darrell861]

“One cannot be introverted or extraverted without being so in every respect.” –Modern Man in Search of a Soul, p. 85: “I do not hold mine to be the only true or possible type-theory.” –p.86

I took the Meyers-Briggs test. I am two parts extravert and one part introvert. This contradicts what Jung said on p. 85. Wkrapek video wanders far afield from Jung's Psychological Types. Also, there are numerous theories of types. It all comes down to brand loyalty: Who's your favorite guru?

[gizmo2084]

It's not called judgmental! It's called Judging or Judgement. At first I though you misspoke once. But you kept saying it wrong over and over.

[mindtheminds]

I am wondering what is the source of linking the functions and architypes. Great videos, keep doing this!!!!!

[jannahmaryam]

i like it.

[BiiLLYPRiiLLY]

I did a test and apparently i'm ENFJ. Its weird but may or may not be true.

[JasamineJackdaw]

what absolute rubbish.!!!!

u know nothing....what about real things what aren't real...our egos are the illussions/dillusssions of others mistakes... u r makin a mistake!!! accept n change xxxx lol;+) xxx

[chaconlake]

bro my teacher just pulled this cabin medow mountain shit on it and sure it kinda explained my "personality type" but the more i dig into Karl Kerenyi and archetypes its seems like mystic,new world bullshit Im gonna learn as much as possible on this shit and school him in how fucking stupid this is

[Darrell861]

@chaconlake It's refreshing to go into these Jungian chatrooms and finally see someone like you who overtly challenges Jung. My experience of these rooms is that they are all part of one big circle jerk, i.e., people who worship Jung. I stumble into the circle jerk and it turns into a hornet's nest. And it makes no difference how familiar I am with Jung, how long I have studied him, or how many direct quotes I can cite.

[ilyademichev]

this "psyhology" is more like astrology

[quixoticmind16]

You are 100% correct! This stuff has NO validity...merely a derivative of the four humors.

[fleisch313]

this is why some (not all but some) people gravitate towards the social "sciences" and others towards the natural sciences

[EvelynGB]

Wow. this didn't explain anything. Why didn't you explain WHAT they actually meant instead of going through every possible combination?

[profanitytalker]

Theirs this awesome website called personalitycafe where you can meet your fellow personality types. You can learn more about the MBTI at personalitycafe

[raigekimaru]

your statement that you use one function at the expense of another is incorrect.

[agnaldojuniorsj]

Translate please!!!

[jchriswest]

you're Cute

[ksuefox45]

How would you cite this information? APA

[ranoosha1210]

thats awsome! umm do u belive in the whole intertype realtions?

[jeanmi0907]

Thanks a lot it really helped me!

[kld9111]

thnx

[AbstractReaIity]

Never confuse judging with judgmental.

[pinkicet]

or sensing with sensation