BBC Doha Debate November 9, 2009 part 4/5 Nourizadeh نوری زاده

[smsajj]

Oh my god ! How good is Dr.marandi

[paulalock14]

Great job Professor Marandi.

Nourizade is a CIA agent.

[storeylas]

Mohammad Marandi is the bravest person I've seen on TV.

Nourizadeh is filth.

[sillas09]

Mashallah Dr Marandi, very well said.

[MonsterIsrael]

The Arabic countries should see, how USA army rape Arabic girl in Iraq, rape to Arabic mother, sister, force to suck cock in Abu Garib jail, kill and fuck on the ass in Guentanamo bay. what a shit!! Doha advocated for USA. IAEA just follow USA. The day Iran drop its nuclear program, USA + Israel invade Iran and fuck the Iranian muslim girls. No Arabic people have the knowledge and education to prevent USA to invade Iran. Only Iran can prevent its country by making WMD like India, Pakistan.

[greeko25]

Because Israel and Pakistan are bullshit nations and have weapons , then must everyone get them ? No , nowone should .

[mrocean21]

Do you consider it fair that some nations are allowed to develop powerful nuclear weapons and hydrogen bombs and but you are not allowed, would you accept this? Is that fair? Would you agree to this? Now North Korea has nuclear weapons, no one will attack it, that brings it security.

[greeko25]

Fairness is not about who has the most weapons .Personally though i do consider it even worse when a 'theocracy' has them cause people representing religious institiutions tend to believe they are the holders of the truth and that their actions are godwilling and nowone should judge them . All small or big , improvised nuclear countries( Pakistan , North Korea ) are corrupted and incompetend . All these goverments,Israel's and Iran's included,are egocentric and frankly dangerous for humanity

[mrocean21]

If we follow you're logic then communistic and democratic nations are the worse since they possess the most amount nukes, thus pose a greater danger to humanity. You consider a theocratic Iran dangerous yet it has not invaded any of it's neighbours for more than 150 years. Note that the majority of miltarty bases in the region are from democratic gov's not theocratic.Nuclear weapons should be completely banned, if not then should be monopolised by certain governments.

[sillas09]

But then start sanctioning and threatening, say, Israel or India, which actually have them. Not Iran, which has no plans of acquiring any. If you take at face value the "reports" that western intelligence passed over to the IAEA, might I recall Colin Powell's embarassing con artist show before the UNSC regarding Iraq's non-existent WMD, or the OSP tasked with forging "evidence" via fake informers such as "Curveball". Now a "laptop" is supposed to "prove" Iran's military intentions? Please...

[greeko25]

@sillas09 I dont buy that they dont seek nuclear weapons . No nation on earth would reach at these lengths , sanctions and all the world against it , just to gain some 'technology knowledge'.I think the(yours?) regime is seeking them desperetaly in order to survive and upgrade itself in the power struggle that's happening in the region . As for Marandi,i have seen that men in interviews justifying everything , even excecutions,all with a straight face . creepy!

[sillas09]

greeko25: Let's not invert the chronology of events. In effect, no nation on earth would accept to abandon its peaceful nuclear program because of threats and sanctions. Iran had / has no plans to build nuclear weapons, yet the IAEA and UNSC, without any proof, manage to sanction it, due to the influence of the US on these institutions (votes of third countries were bought or obtained through pressures)... So Iran's insistence is normal, not a sign of it "hiding" anything.

[sillas09]

greeko25 (cont'd): The sanctions were not justified to begin with, just as the accusations against Iraq in 2003 were bereft of any substance. So why should Iran bow to these sanctions? Secondly, if Iran accepts to abandon its sovereign right on civilian nuclear technology, then what will they impose on it tomorrow? Look at recent history, western hostility and unilateral sanctions against the Islamic Republic started from day one of the Revolution.

[sillas09]

greeko 25 (cont'd): As far as the regional power struggle is concerned, why would Iran desperately need nuclear weapons to remain in the race? Today, without having to fire a single bullet, and without WMD, Iran is at the peak of its power and influence, in part thanks to idiotic US policies of occupation and war, and of course thanks to the wisdom of its leadership.

[sillas09]

greeko25 (cont'd): What I heard Dr Marandi say, and I agree with it, is that contrary to what western media have been suggesting day-in day-out, the sentenced individuals were not convicted for participating in peaceful demonstrations, but because they were part of the "Kingdom Assembly of Iran", which bombed a mosque in Shiraz killing innocent civilians. How would US experts react to reports that those locked up and tortured at Guantanamo Bay or Bagram are but peaceful pro-democracy activists?

[greeko25]

I have heard Marandi say in many interviews that he doesnt vote for the ruiling party but he is on tv , on any chance he gets to defend everything they do so there's goes his objectivity i guess . I consider Iran's leader and his rhetoric as idiotic as lets say , Netanyahu's or Bush's . I was against that Iraq war all . I believe history will judge Bush and Blair as harsh as they deserve to be judged but that doesnt make everything that Iran(its leaders not the people ) do and say right .

[sillas09]

greeko25 (cont'd): Gentleman, if accepting the legitimacy of the political system makes one "part" of it, then so be it. The majority acually consider the Islamic Republic as the country's legitimate form of governance, since it was achieved through a popular revolution and voted in by two referenda. One doesn't need to work for the state in order to hold the belief that it is legitimate. Unfortunately, the "opposition" is quick to label anyone who holds that view as a "paid agent".

[pasgad]

It is not for any of us to decide whether Iran should or should'nt have access to NP. Considering most of Iran's neighbours already have access to this technology I don't see why Iran shouldn't. Although I think such progress should happen under a free democratic Iran. We hope that the people of Iran succeed in reaching that point very soon.

[sullivanseven]

Mr.Marandi You are a shame, Even if you con other counry's people, we know the evils you are backing.

[mrocean21]

Marandi is backing the right to nuclear civilian technology, how does that make him evil? Do you not wish you're own country to gain technology to generate electricity? To develop?

[sullivanseven]

Dear mrocean21, when some one kills your sister, would you consider him as your friend? would you let him explain you that they killed her because she walked in the streets? Isn't this the same strategy of Taliban in Afghanistan? There is no doubt about all humans right to have technology, but what about the right to live? to speak? to choose? the basic right of human beings?

[mesdaghi2]

noorizade! u r an embarrassment to Iranian people by sitting next to that whore who questioned iran's sovereignty on Persian islands Persian gulf! u betrayed ur country

[mesdaghi2]

noorizadeh it is embarassing to sit on arab's front! specially next to that whore

[zarchoobeh]

How can you trust a government killing, raping, kidnapping, and torturing its own innocent people? They are LIARS! Lie after lie...They don't have mercy for Iranian people...How do you expect them to have mercy on other contries? It's just common sense!

[woodengun]

Granma in orange .... Suck my Dick and be happy!!!

[IranehAziz]

Iran (MULLAHS) sign everything to bullshXX the world! Wait and see.

[mafiahamid]

i'm against both of them, marandi supports the regime and nourizadeh wants iran to be bomed