Added: 2 years ago
From: UpTakeVideo
Views: 67,661
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (168)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • TAPIOOOOOOOOCA!

  • @wrangomonger A very good analogy!

  • a white women claiming non white heritage that's a laugh especially when the meso americans depicted themselves in art as a black and dark brown people

    the spanish colonialist called the children of women their raped "Mexicans" or half breed mutt bastards.

    "there was 2 kinds of slaves the Field Negro vs House Negro, the house negro lived in the masters house and ate his food, the house negro would love the master more than himself, he would die for his master" Malcom X

  • What needs to be, I am sorry to say is need to impeach the 4 members of the supreme court that stepped on the intent of the bill of rights. It seem they have gone senile and forgot the meaning of the words -- bear, keep, shall, not, infringed. Not only that those 4 can’t - won’t look up the words in a dictionary to find the definitions to those words.

  • Here's my take on judges: Most judges were lawyers before they became judges. And most lawyers are unethical and can't be trusted.

    And there is no logical reason to believe that someone like a lawyer will suddenly become ethical just because he or she is called a judge. A leopard's spots don't change.

    I think judges should NOT be former lawyers. They should be chosen from court clerks with law degrees or private citizens who studied law.

    Lawyers like Sotomayor are ruining our country.

  • bunkhouse, also google this:

    "Sonia Sotomayor - Obama's New Activist Judge"

    Among other things, she's an advocate for illegal aliens.

  • @tncdel Your doing an awful lot of complaining about activist judges. Just wondering what your opinion is on the recent ruling on Citizens United v. FEC? There seems to be an amazing amount of bitching from the right about Sotomayor and not a peep about this ruling which completely undermines the average individual in the election process. Could it be because this ruling (which is the very definition of judicial activism) came from the right side of the bench? I will also Google that.

  • @bunkhouse, activist judges are politicians, not impartial dispensers of justice, as judges should be. Sotomayor's a politician with agendas. She should not be a judge. Same goes for any other poltician on the bench, left or right.

  • Mitt Will be the Next PresiDent of the U S A.......

  • First degree murder may be illegal under New York State law? Wowee. What a legal genius.

  • @snakedoc67 She's being sarcastic - isn't that obvious from the laughter?

  • Although I can't say you're wrong, Sotomayor still seems like she will the least of the crew. And her judicial record indicates that she follows an agenda, rather than adjudicates impartially and equitably.

  • Sotomayor doesn't impress me at all. Surely, if they wanted a Hispanic female justice, there must be a better one somewhere in our country.

  • Have you looked at the other supreme court judges? Do they impress you? They are all unimpressive to me.

  • @tncdel Doesn't impress? She had more bench experience than any justice appointed in the last 100 years. Listen to the confirmation hearings as a whole. Not impressive? I wish the partisanship was taken out of this because this was an inspiring moment in our history. BTW, I am a white, blue collar, middle class male.

  • bunkhouse, were you joking, or were you seriously trying to convince me that "She had more bench experience than any justice appointed in the last 100 years?" If so, then please don't insult my intelligence. You'd have no less a chance at selling that BS to anyone than you would trying to sell oceanfront property in Arizona.

    Soto's record affirms that she is an activist judge with a POLITICAL agenda, that impairs her impartiality to uphold the Constitution.

  • @tncdel Look it up. She has more experience on the bench than any justice who was appointed in the last 100 years.

  • @tncdel For example, Scalia served on the bench for 4 years prior to appointment to the Supreme Court and John Roberts served 2 years. Sotomayor first served in the US District Court in 1991 and was on the bench till her appointment to the Supreme Court. She was initally appoint by George H.W. Bush I believe. If you are basing that she is an "activist judge" on the firefighter case get your facts straight. Because that case proves exactly the opposite.

  • @bunkhouse, google "Sotomayor activist judge," and see what you come up with.

  • "Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, called Sotomayor an avowed judicial activist who believes the role of the Court is to set policy, and who will likely impose her personal policy and beliefs onto others from the bench.

  • bunkhouse,

    "Wendy Long, counsel for the Judicial Confirmation Network (an organization that opposes judicial activism), characterized the nominee as a favorite of far-left special interest groups who will indulgeleft-wing policy preferences instead of neutrally applying the law.

    I saw many other such references citing Sotomayor as an activist judge.

  • @tncdel I looked up both of these organizations and do not claim to know all that much about either. But they both have their agendas from what I've read. They are certainly partisan. That in itself (whether to the right or left) makes me question their credibility, particularly AUL Once I see a "news person" from MSNBC or FOX praising and/or throwing softballs at someone I can't help but not take that person serious. . Unfortunately in today's climate it is hard to find a neutral source.

  • @bunkhouse, the only way I can see that would ensure impartial neutral adjudications would be for us to harness the resources we now have in the computer age. By creating "cyber judges," programmed so that all a court clerk has to do is to feed the facts presented on the case, then the computer spits out a verdict. The computer would be "blind" to who the parties are. So there could be no discrimination for race, etc. But of course you know lawyers would never let themselves be replaced by that.

  • Coburn rocks

  • I stand corrected, in the US the penalty for high treason is life in prison.

  • Come get Him!

  • Judge Sotomeyor - THE PIG THAT SUPPORTS PRESIDENT OBAMA.

  • At least learn to spell the name of people you don't like. It's Sotomayor, not Sotomeyor, dumbass. Go cry your heart out, Sarah Stalin... I mean Palin loving redneck.

  • Tell you what I'll kiss Palin and you can take pics - if you will kiss that fat mexcan justice so I can take pics. you can put a silk dress on a sow but that thing will always be a sow.

  • I distinctly heard 'EXplainin to do'!!.....and this is all it takes for a lefttard liberal outrage?? my gawd!!

    Yet (hypocritically) completely ignoring Sotomayor's incredibly biased and bigoted remarks over spans of decades. She even admits publically that her grades weren't good enough to get into Harvard, but Affirmative Action slid her in anyway! Yet somehow, she had the audacity to pronounce Latino woman's intellect to be superior to that of a "white mans" or however the wingnut put it.

  • I didn't hear EX; I also don't know if it's been doctored or not. I can tell you that when I first heard Coburn say it (live), R. Ricardo popped into my head. I have no way of knowing what was in Coburn's head, so I'm not going to try and guess. And hey, I'm what you call a Liberal.

    Now, rounded perspective comes out of experience, and also out of hardship - out of experiencing every day unfairness. Law for the everyman is best shepherded by an educated everyman. Thus "Wise Latina".

  • "I can tell you that when I first heard Coburn say it (live), R. Ricardo popped into my head. "

    All I can say is that I'm over 50 and I wouldn't have thought of Ricky Ricardo in a million years. I guess if that's the sort of thing you look for, then you'll probably find it anywhere and everywhere.

  • "Law for the everyman is best shepherded by an educated everyman. Thus "Wise Latina".

    How poetic. Unfortunately, not practical. By your 'poetic' logic, we should stack the Judge & Jury of a racial hate crime with Racists and Bigots.

    Wait.......Come to think of it, in Sotomayor's case, that's exactly what we'll be doing! Ah, now I smell what you're steppin in! Nice try. lol

  • Captain (sheesh - do you wear epaulets?),

    FAIL! Before you try and extend someone's logic, you might need to brain up. I was honest and fair - but what you heard was some attempt by me to take your gun or some shit. I was raised in a conservative home, I hunt occasionally,own guns, but I also do "weirdo" things like play soccer with foreigners, hate baseball, believe in God but want Him out of my country's government and vice versa. You spout trite ideology. Is that all you want out of life?

  • Comment removed

  • apewool, If I had "epaulets", I'd first consult a doctor. And judging by your completely out of touch, baseless conclusions and assumptions that you pull out of freaking nowhere, perhaps you should seek some sort of medical advice!! Guns? Hunting? How do you even come up with this shit?? lmaooo

    You're so vehemently unhinged, rabid, and liberally crazed I'm afraid you're going to pop a vein or give yourself a hernia!

  • No, you're right. I'll get some help now. Thanks for the grounded assessment. You're very bright.

  • "Law for the everyman is best shepherded by an educated everyman. Thus "Wise Latina". "

    Simply put, Sotomayor believes she is free to re-interpret law according to her own personal emotional biases. That's wrong. But on other hand, she probably won't be much worse than Sutter.......Just saying that judgments based upon an emotional Lifetime movie moment aka "Wise Latina" moment has no place in the US Supreme Court.

  • I don't think that her emotional biases were ever an issue. However, everyone has biases informed by their experiences. If you think judges are immune to that, then you lack a fundamental understanding of the human condition. Have you noticed that there are a lot of split decisions on the Supreme Court? Same laws, same Constitution, different conclusions. I know you'll respond with some inane riff on one phrase within this email, but in the words of Barbara Bush, "I'm through with you".

  • "Re-interpret law according to her own personal biases"? Are you basing this on the New Haven Firefighter case. Because, in that case, she upheld the law. Title V states that the test results should be thrown out if the results were as they were (I do not agree with the law at all, but it is the law). Federal appellate court justices are required to apply law and have less room for interpretation. She did exactly what she was supposed to do.

  • Coburn says: you've got a lot of 'splaining to do!' - and gets by with this?

    Who is the racist? Desi Arnaz was a brilliant comedian/actor/businessman (founder of Desilu) - how many people among you speak two languages?

  • huzzah!

  • At the riot, no militias are regulated. Plead against standing armies, quartered at riot, you pop open the gun-locker. Judge Sotomayor has a high profile, among the movie-mystics. Stallone foreshadows RUTH BADER, by ruthless killer parts in the 1980s, while Antonio Banderas shows Sonia Sotomayor. Bad news, Iron Butterfly, Creedence in 'TRAVELLING BAND,' and Skynyrd in 'That Smell' foreshadow a dire failure of a 747, in 2011, over corruption and graft, already evident. See DESIGNING WOMEN.

  • Mike Seidman, Georgetown law professor:

    "I was completely disgusted by Judge Sotomayor's testimony today. If she was not perjuring herself, she is intellectually unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. If she was perjuring herself, she is morally unqualified. How could someone who has been on the bench for seventeen years possibly believe that judging in hard cases involves no more than applying the law to the facts?"

    (The Federalist Society Online Debate Series)

  • This is an interesting quotation. Is it not the case that, until one gets to the Supreme Court, that is (usually) exactly what is expected - otherwise it's "activism" by the judge. However, once a case gets to the Supreme Court, it is not only the decision, but also the applicable law itself, that are held up against our Constitution. If lesser court judges believe firmly that the law is wrong, they may go "activist", but otherwise, Judge Sotomayor is accurate. That's my humble understanding.

  • The below refers to AA32m7io1's posting of a quotation by Mike Seidman, Georgetown law professor, about 7/21.

  • All of the unprofessional comments only help to demonstrate the character racist of many Americans who judge Justice Sotomayor without a clear understanding of the exercise of the law by any means! Good enough to let her to seat in the Supreme Court Chair! Urrah!

    Marlen Arguedas-

  • It's a 30 second video that has no context, of course you don't know what she's saying, you dumbasses.

  • WTF is she talking about!

  • your a dick if you had any balls you'd say that to a latino or a black person have some honor in your race and step up instead of hiding like a bitch pls save your time dont respond

  • dude i say that to whover wants to listen(which obviously includes your dumbass lol)... dude, i'm not racist, i just don't like giving handouts when there are more qualified people for ANY job... sotomayor has a long record of going against merit for positions and favoring quotas(look up the "firefighter test" case she ruled on that was OVERTURNED by the supremes)... i'm democrat, but i don't believe in handouts to the less qualified, whatever race they are, sorry you think your race is inferior

  • Handouts less Qualified..........hmm you mean like the BUSH Cronies? Yeah I dont think my race is inferior but obvilously you've never been pulled over for absolutely looking latino.

  • bush cronies??? of course any political position surrounds themselves with cronies, i'm talking about GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS that aim to fill quotas instead of seeking the most qualified candidates. dude, i'm not knocking your race, i'm just saying it's ridiculous in today's world to set aside a certain number of spots for any job based on your color, which is exactly what is going on.

  • Contrary to popular misconception, Sotomayor and the other members of the panel did NOT rule that the test should be thrown out. Rather, they ruled on appeal that the city acted in accordance with state law when THE CITY threw the test out.

    The plaintiffs took their case to the supremes who were not bound to uphold the state law. Had Sotomayor et al ruled that way, it would have been judicial activism.

    Do you have any other examples of her "long" record of discrimination against whites?

  • "Do you have any other examples of her "long" record of discrimination against whites? "

    here's what i wrote, einstein..

    "sotomayor has a long record of going against merit for positions and favoring quotas"

    but i guess your racist eyes saw it however you deemed fit lol...

    spin the words however you may, the supreme court OVERTURNED her decision on the matter.. even before she starts, she shows the world she's not qualified to be a part of it.

  • Okay, do you have any other examples r "long record of going against merit?"

    Yes, the Supremes overturned her, but they did NOT say that she and the two other circuit judges, ruled incorrectly, Einstein.

    They said that the state law, which ALL the judges who looked at this case applied, was wrong.

    Well, only the supremes can say that. Judges are not allowed to ignore the law.  Unless you think she should have applied some sort of "empathy" standard. That would be judicial activism.

  • i watched her for 2 hours yesterday, she juggled under all the hard questions, writing on her fucking pad like its there for something, she is a dumbass that does not to be at the top of the chain

  • Yes, she lacks the gravitas and impressive pedigree of Harriet Myers.

  • wat the fuck was she saying?!

    she did not make any fucking sense.

    oh sure im Hispanic, but hey, i dont go for her

    please reject her.

    we dont need anymore Liberal Dumbasses

  • we can see that, just by the way you write

  • Coburn asked this fucking Commie SEVERAL TIMES if a person has a right to defend himself. SHE COULD NOT ANSWER HIM.

    The bottom line: Reject this "latina" asshole.

    Case closed.

  • yeah, kuz communism isn't seen as the perfect society...you're thinking of socialism you stupid shit.

    You've used the word commie and communist, probably several times in your life, to describe someone, and you didn't even know what you were saying wasn't what you meant. bottom line: you'd be better off never giving your opinion to ANYTHING

  • Second.

  • Screw the Democrats and Screw the Republicans, they don't give a shit about you

  • very true. I hate democrats and i am a conservative republican, but it's sad to say that republicans are stupid too.

    I'm scared for the nation.

  • @SecretAgent009 im curious, don't consider this offensive or anything, because i for one don't give two damns about neather party, but why do you hate democrats? i already know why democrats hate republicans

  • Agreed, two wings of the same vulture.

    People are so eager to belong to a party that they forget what life was like before they made decisions based on their designation rather than their own beliefs.

    Its only getting worse.

  • fukin dumb republicants

  • Now THAT"S funny!

  • LUCY.........you got some splainin to do!!!!

  • It's a done deal.

    She has such an outstanding record even our 2 very conservative state senators from Texas will vote for her.

    Sure, Jeff Sessions won't vote for her but he wouldn't vote for Jesus Christ if he was appointed by Barack.

  • Why do we have to endure the bullshit dog and pony show?

    She has the position. The question being asked are by republicans and to that degree mean nothing. She has refused to answer several questions including abortion views and all is good. So again why fucking bother she has presidential support and the support of the controlling party. But these asshole put on this show so that it seems like theyre really doing their damn job.

  • You must be another FOXNews robot and Rush is your god.

  • Have your mommy password protect her screen saver.

  • Listening to the Latina dolt butcher the English language throughout her career is painful and hilarious.

    Knowing the bigoted Ms. Sodomizer was at the top of Obama bin Liberal's list is insightful.

  • Let's hear you speak Spanish. From what I can see, you can barely manage English.

  • Hop on Mz. Sodomizer's back and swim to Cuba, or one of your other beloved nightmares, jackass.

  • TylerNull... the Null must be your IQ.

  • TylerNull IQ: You can make all the ignorant racist redneck Repugnican remarks you want. She will be the next Supreme Court Justice so get over it!

  • "

    Equality on Trial

    For the fourth time in six cases, the Supreme Court of the United States has reversed a decision for which Judge Sonia Sotomayor voted on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. If this nominee were a white male, would this not raise questions about whether he should be elevated to a court that has found his previous decisions wrong two-thirds of the times when those decisions have been reviewed?

    "

    -- Thomas Sowell on Sotomayor appointment

  • Your comment makes absolutely zero sense.

    Something tells me you still don't understand the situation.

  • I don't agree w/ Coburn on a # of issues but I highly respect this Repulican's independence...he strongly opposed Bush' Iraq War.

    Now he claims he'll support the Private Option on Health Care...if he follows thru on that I'll respect him even more.

  • Comment removed

  • This isn't racist, go look up the word ffs.

  • god i fucking wish obama would have some balls and nominate someone who really does represent the epitome of a modern progressive.

    these crocodile tears from conservatives are annoying, if only we had a liberal Bush in the whitehouse. That would give them something to fucking cry about

  • She can't even talk! Get her out now!

  • She can't talk? What do you call that crap coming out of Sessions' and Graham's mouths? Not to mention all that gobbledygook that Bush spewed for 8 years.

  • Great, we now have a rascist socialist judge in the highest court in the land.

  • why we wasting the tax payers money, to many idiot libs are going to get sotomanure in!

  • A gaggle of white men afraid of extinction!

  • "The phrase carries some ethnic baggage"!?! The phrase was from a racist caricature of a cuban not a puerto rican. I would say yes if you use a racist stereotype and cannot even get the right ethnicity you have some baggage right there. Another losing issue for republicans. they are so clueless they do not even recognize their own racism.

  • To what English word does "splainin(g)" refer to?

    Cannot find it out. Thank you for your help

    Elimar

  • Really? A senate hearing with the first latina supreme court nominee and Sen. Coburn picks that opportunity to use an 'I Love Lucy' faux Ricky Ricardo accent? Uh, okay. Good luck with that.

  • So I'm wondering why some of the countries during the early middle ages never named themselves IGOD.

    I would imagine that the country named IGOD could have kicked some major ass. Not just here but everywhere else.

  • I am for Sotomayor ! !

    Vote her in, I belive she is pro-life.

    MJT

  • Well a house nigger are the hip hop dope selling bums those are house niggers understand.

  • Even if someone says something that sounds racist dont hit them chill and put them in jail. The bad thing about hate crimes is that your own race can use it against you. House niggers spicks and real jews. AKA Colored Republicans

  • See thats the reason why psychotic racists spit threw hot water lynched sodomized whatever else. We have Civil Rights Hate Crimes if someone calls you a nigger or spick or jew. Thats why racists try to get a response so that you will go to jail and stay a minority, and end up a slave.

  • Sonia Sotomayor is an intelligent and articulate woman who has earned her nomination to the supreme Court. Racism and Sexism will not prevail here, although sadly they will try.

  • Yah, and I'm a Purpleian and .... Those republicans (racists) were really trying Sotomayor today. One guy must have been drunk or had just got done snorting. He called Sotomayor a "wise latina". See that's how racists operate today. They say shit looking for an incriminating response. I can't believe she was dumb enough to mention anything about race. Yah, they used racists innuendos towards her, but she is a lawyer, come on man. Handle it in a legal way.

  • As an Iranian, i must say that this women is RACIST, just google about her and you will know what im saying. America is about everyone that lives in it, this women is a member of LA RAZA, all she cares about is hispanics, which is understandable, but not as a judge.

  • bullshit go back to IRAN

  • To Zyou8er: GO BACK TO IRAN. OUR NATION WILL BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT PEOPLE FROM THAT PART OF THE REGION...................how dare you calling Sotomayor Racist???? fucking dumb Iranian, Don't get me stared on this, bitch. FUCK I CAN EVEN SMELL YOUR MUSLIM FANATIC ASS ACROSS THE INTERNET..........FUCK OFF.

  • IRANIAN ARE TERRORIST, THEY TRAIN TERRORIST AND THEY TRAIN LITTLE KIDS SINCE DAY ONE "TO HATE OUR COURNTRY".....................­....iranina, PLEASE GO BACK TO YOUR REGION, YOU DON'T BELONG HERE., PLEASE GO BACK TO IRAN, WHERE YOU CAN BE A TRULY MUSLIM, WHO HATE AMERICANS. PLEAS IRANIANS GO BACK HOME. WE DON'T WANT YOU PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY.

  • Take a look at Zyou8er's profile. If you honestly think he's Iranian, you're a fuckin' moron.

  • i don't understand what this case is about..

  • Racist!!!!

    Everyone here is racist!

    Everyone in this video is racist too!

    In fact, I'm feeling a ltitle bit racist.

  • she was born in the bronx and is from puerto rican descent. she will get nominated, all you simple thinking racist douche tards will shut up :)

  • Not only will I never be silenced this women is a racist and that is that! You may want to look up racist in the ol' Webster!

  • Send this dumb racist product affirmative action back to Fillapeeknow land.

  • Who would be a Latino? Would a Brazilian be one? How about someone from Spain? How about someone from Guyana?

  • I wish this woman had something to do with Ricky Ricardo, but her upbringing has nothing to do with the interests of any Latino American I have ever seen....

  • She will try to be the ruin of the Constitution.

  • her face always has an angry/pissy look on it

  • botox

  • she says id be in a lot of trouble then... subliminal bitch.

  • Is 'splaining' some kind of women code? ;)

  • Comment removed

  • If I hear "SOTOMAYOR" again. My stomach may hurt then who knows.

  • People will latch onto any small thing people say. Dang, it's sad. It use to be action we watched, not words. Now every little thing we do we could be judged upon if anybody catches us. -_-

  • I don't agree w/ Coburn on many issues -- but he's a good Republican & I give him credit for having an independent mind.

    He was 1 Republican who was screaming that we should not invade Iraq.

    And now it looks like he'll support the public option on health care (if he does, good for him on that).

  • Q. What will the difference be between President Obama and Karl Marx?

    A. Karl Marx had way more experience.

  • HAHA - funny but true

  • Das isht vaan faockur sak fatsi

  • wow, you posted this video for that???? Liberals are so weak and worthless.

  • stupid ass, it is clear the republican idiots have nothing....

  • Hmmm classic American political dung fight.

  • I love how he clears his throat right after (what the fuck did i just say? shit)

  • This might have been a good place for her to inject after his remark, "oh, now I remember why I said something about a latino woman having better judgement than a white male."

  • Wow. I wonder if he realizes that it's 2000 and freaking 9!?!

  • Oklahoma is one of the reddest of the reds:

    ONLY state that had EVERY COUNTY vote for McCain in 2008.

  • secede creat your mini country nad go away from the country of New Yorker!!!!hahaha

  • eeeeew

  • i'd tell them all to take this job and shove it right up ur racist asses!

  • Then they'd get what they want. Hardly a way to end the likes of them and their thinking

  • Racist, old, white, men.

    Hopefully going the way of the Dodo bird...

    Fux sakes.

  • god forbid, since who would the rest of you leech off

  • narrow minded mouthbreathers like yer own self

  • Ah, Republican humor. The first thing that comes to mind when Tom Coburn sees someone of Latino heritage is Ricky Ricardo!

    Maybe next he'll do his Señor Wences impression! ¡Ay, caramba!

  • I find her rather refreshing in these hearings compared to past nominees.

  • Why is her ethnicity just front and center for Republicans???

  • Why is her ethnicity front and center in her life... instead of being an American... she is a wise latina

  • Toddo31:

    Why is Sotomayor's ethnicity front & center for Republicans??

    Because of Sotomayor's own comments about making "better" decisions than white men because of her ethnicity

  • YEAH!! You go Oklahoma!

    Show them how ignorant you are!

    Oklahoma, that's my state from my teen years! Ignorance capital of the world, GO OKLAHOMA, WOOOOOO~!!

  • HAHA, yeah I agree.

    Oklahoma has to be one of the dumbest fucking states in the US.

  • What the hell? Really? Republicans really don't want the support of hispanics, do they?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more