Free energy can change the world!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
I invented a breakthrough energy source that contradicts the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.
@ih8umor It looks like it has been a while....and no one has answered this question(that I can see anyway) so I figure I will take a shot at it. The answer is no..... Of course you can MAKE mercury into an ELECTROMAGNET....if you ran current through a tube that forces the Mercury into a coil...(or for that matter if you mixed liquid mercury with some substance that would not dilute its conductivity too much , but that would make it hard enough to mold into such a shape).
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
Would of been more impressive to have the ball floating on its own. It is possible, ive seen it being done on a toy in the gadget shop. Took me 10 minutes to get it floating, and once it was it could spin, and rock back and forth, as if suspended on a string. Once i left, someone pushed it too hard and it fell.... 10 minutes work destroyed!
Those toys use a diamagnetic substance like bismuth. This means its repelled by either pole of a magnet. Stability cannot be achieved with a piece of steel or another magnet.
There is a point of equilibrium: big deal. It is well known that all such points in a static system like this are unstable. One might as well try to balance a bowling bowl on the point of a knitting needle. Of course, even the latter is possible if the ball is set spinning. Hmmm, I think that I shall call it a Levitron ...
continued: The point is that anything less than stable equilibrium just will not do. I don't think that any more subtle stable-stability situations can pertain in this case; even if one includes the effect of the gradient force (in the electrostatic case) which was unknown in Earnshaw's day.
Anyone who can find a non-spinning 'loophole in Earnshaw', for your situation, will earn a million in the novelty market. Spin the whole array? I wonder ...
Looking at your stated age (haha), reminds me of something surprising. When I was a schoolboy, I could have met (theoretically) somebody who worked with Faraday (albeit as a 'lab rat').
John Tyndall's young wife (after fatally poisoning him) lived until WW2.
Kind of puts the rapidity of progress in electromagnetism into stark perspective, doesn't it?
Hmmm, I expressed that badly: what I meant was that I could have met him theoretically, not that such a person existed theoretically. I had a specific person in mind.
omfg this happens 10 billion times a day in particle accelerators, focus arrays, and toys. Science is dead in the Steorn forums. Just because you make up words doesn't mean you make up new science. This is sad :(
You can buy this as a toy from the local chemistry shop, a spinning magnet levitates above a large permanent magnet. no need for opposing magnets or anything else, the spinning top balances itself above the single magnet. But its just a toy - just like this is.
just search you tube for "amateurs with a magnetic levitating spinning top"
problem was the half sphere, he called that 3 dimensional but without an identical top piece the field is incomplete and dissipates irratically, IE: the instable sweet spot. a top piece with the right inclination will not only suspend the center pin but will spin it perpetually (well as long as the magnets hold their magnetism). With the right alignment of the interior drive magnets and a properly polarized hemisphere casing can be bonded together self enclosed by the casing locking together.
Bismuth or certain types of carbon work well at this. They are reppeled by both north and south poles. Unfortunately it is not very strong of an effect and generally only very tiny pieces in the pressence of very strong magnets can be levitated. It can work though......Ive bought a small demo with (i think) about 4 magnets set a certain way with a piece of carbon that floats....it is very tiny though and kinda hard to see.
Basically the same thing is accomplished with a few models Ive seen. No rockers though just electro magnets and an optical sensor which turns the magnet(s) on or off according to how close the object gets to the magnet... Essentialy making it float.also a coil of wire with AC current will hoover over a thick piece of aluminum.
Dude please he did it because the experiment was mentioned on the steorn forum. And who can you possibly think would beleive this is overunity? People like you!!!
it could work; the problem is that it must be suspended by being repelled; that way, the closer it gets to one magnet, the more it is pushed away, leading to a balance.
ive got an idea kinda of like this. but it hase to do with also arranging magnets on the ball. all magnets on the (plastic)ball would face the same pole outwards and the magnets in the bowl would have the same pole facing inwards.
check this, take a CD attach magnets several magnets facing - side down around the cd(for instance) then make a table with many many magnets all facing - side up (for instance lol) then spin the CD and let hover over table of magnets. would have to be well balanced, i think it would levitate
It certainly would if properly balanced and with fast enough spin. I had a spinning magnetic top similar to this and it worked. It's really cool to see it levitate.
I don't hear any outrageous claims i think people should open their mind and just look its an experiment not a claim so back off. "if it were not for people trying to break the laws of physics newer laws would not be written and the world would still be flat according to the roman catholic church"
If you had a load of iron filings, and carefully introduce them to roughly where you think the balance point is, and let them go free, are you not more likely to find it than by hand? Getting a large ball like that right at the point would be tricky.. by using many small particles, chances are greater.
think of it like this. You are trying to ballance a bar on a point. On this bar there is no middle (which seems impossible)but it is permanent magnets we are talking about. Soooo. it will never balance. same principle. except invisible.
awesome, I would love to see this in the practical application of a friction free magnetic bearing, well you would have to also eliminate air friction with a vacuume to be 100% friction free. Now combine two magnetic bearings as shown above with a brushless AC motor provided by Tesla and you have Over unity power generation because the extreme reduction in friction is then applied to momentum and not heat.
Ignoramus! Just because you've eliminated bearing friction doesn't mean you automatically have anything close to 100% efficiency. There is still the resistance of the wire which causes loss. 'Over unity' is a concept used exclusively by the scientifically illiterate and other weak minded nut jobs.
Ernshaws Theorum basically dictates that no arraingment of permanent magnets will result in magnetic levitation without some kind of mechanical anchor, nice try though!
Earnshaw's Theorem States that there is no STABLE equilibrium with any arrangement, there is a "sweet spot" but it is unstable, As is stated numerous times by the videographer who does appear to know his stuff and is demonstrating the limited degrees of freedom that can be attained using his configuration
can you make it free float?
Tj1056 4 months ago
stop making videos and spank it to your family members
jtardman 7 months ago
he's german.
Scanon66 1 year ago
bon encore un qui n'à pas été à l'école !!!
djpeyoooo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy can change the world!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
Rread4549 1 year ago
wasn't this an experiment to prove something from a forum? dude's before you start insulting READ!!!
kilsikon7 1 year ago
retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard retard
MILUTHEEYE 1 year ago
experiment with a half bouuuuulll !!!
alokinzna 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source that contradicts the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and for $3M for patents. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
What are you afraid of Tommy? Sie Germans?
Grundalizer 1 year ago 2
does mercury conduct magnetism?
ih8umor 1 year ago
@ih8umor It looks like it has been a while....and no one has answered this question(that I can see anyway) so I figure I will take a shot at it. The answer is no..... Of course you can MAKE mercury into an ELECTROMAGNET....if you ran current through a tube that forces the Mercury into a coil...(or for that matter if you mixed liquid mercury with some substance that would not dilute its conductivity too much , but that would make it hard enough to mold into such a shape).
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac cheers for that
ih8umor 1 year ago
no,only cobalt,iron and nickel are magnetic.
infoseeker228 1 year ago
@infoseeker228 ok thanks,
ih8umor 1 year ago
@infoseeker228 and alloys containing them, of which NdFeB is the most powerful discovered to date
44R0Ndin 8 months ago
for stability try to give some angular momentum to the sphere so it stays in some like orbital spin stability, I'm supposing wildly however!
correocasa3 1 year ago
stability is good there, it's just unstable... ? lol
sakadafreak 1 year ago
correction "stability isnt there"
therealcedz 1 year ago
Now seriously, what did you expect?
bartomanboy 1 year ago
мля... еслиб как на левитроне, то да, а так хуйня.
Inkubat0r 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD DELIVERANCE IS COMING!
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
.
conceil8 2 years ago
Comment removed
qwertypenis 2 years ago
what a retarded penis comment.
pcpolarbear1 2 years ago
Would of been more impressive to have the ball floating on its own. It is possible, ive seen it being done on a toy in the gadget shop. Took me 10 minutes to get it floating, and once it was it could spin, and rock back and forth, as if suspended on a string. Once i left, someone pushed it too hard and it fell.... 10 minutes work destroyed!
gimmeurdosh 2 years ago
Those toys use a diamagnetic substance like bismuth. This means its repelled by either pole of a magnet. Stability cannot be achieved with a piece of steel or another magnet.
qwertypenis 2 years ago
Damn. Would it be possible to do the same thing with a person in some kind of metal suit?
RichyBabess 2 years ago
Well its a very weak effect. You would need massive magnets and a massive suit. Even then you would probably only levitate a few mm.
qwertypenis 2 years ago
"it would just shoot to the next magnet if i put it there without tube" what are you guys saying is fake? morons
mnash123 2 years ago
boring
cmlegend 2 years ago
you sound like a fag
StudioMarkovTrg 2 years ago
ppl like you make god cry
flyingcatofhim 2 years ago
Fake
oOOFrunXOOo 3 years ago
Fail.
XxMrMaliciousxX 3 years ago
There is a point of equilibrium: big deal. It is well known that all such points in a static system like this are unstable. One might as well try to balance a bowling bowl on the point of a knitting needle. Of course, even the latter is possible if the ball is set spinning. Hmmm, I think that I shall call it a Levitron ...
flowerbower 3 years ago
Yes, Earnshaw's Theorem precludes an equilibrium point for any static ferromagnetic system. (The bowling ball is a good analogy, BTW.)
While he said there is a point where it is easier to hold onto the magnet, he didn't say anything about perfect equilibrium.
googlephi 2 years ago
Well, quite a few situations evade Earnshaw's theorem (which is more difficult to prove than it appears to be at first sight).
flowerbower 2 years ago
Oops, pressed 'post' by mistake.
continued: The point is that anything less than stable equilibrium just will not do. I don't think that any more subtle stable-stability situations can pertain in this case; even if one includes the effect of the gradient force (in the electrostatic case) which was unknown in Earnshaw's day.
Anyone who can find a non-spinning 'loophole in Earnshaw', for your situation, will earn a million in the novelty market. Spin the whole array? I wonder ...
flowerbower 2 years ago
Looking at your stated age (haha), reminds me of something surprising. When I was a schoolboy, I could have met (theoretically) somebody who worked with Faraday (albeit as a 'lab rat').
John Tyndall's young wife (after fatally poisoning him) lived until WW2.
Kind of puts the rapidity of progress in electromagnetism into stark perspective, doesn't it?
flowerbower 2 years ago
Hmmm, I expressed that badly: what I meant was that I could have met him theoretically, not that such a person existed theoretically. I had a specific person in mind.
flowerbower 2 years ago
lazy borring ass
Noijen112 3 years ago
that was so random.
slartie42 3 years ago
How exciting was that ....!
rebirth3X 3 years ago
omfg this happens 10 billion times a day in particle accelerators, focus arrays, and toys. Science is dead in the Steorn forums. Just because you make up words doesn't mean you make up new science. This is sad :(
ketamunke 3 years ago
The museum of science and industry in chicago has the same idea displayed there ... a steel ball balanced on this same type of idea... it does work!
Mike2008and2008 3 years ago
lame
xtreme199326 3 years ago
Le Sigh
MazGhost 3 years ago
You can buy this as a toy from the local chemistry shop, a spinning magnet levitates above a large permanent magnet. no need for opposing magnets or anything else, the spinning top balances itself above the single magnet. But its just a toy - just like this is.
just search you tube for "amateurs with a magnetic levitating spinning top"
rrmackay 3 years ago
problem was the half sphere, he called that 3 dimensional but without an identical top piece the field is incomplete and dissipates irratically, IE: the instable sweet spot. a top piece with the right inclination will not only suspend the center pin but will spin it perpetually (well as long as the magnets hold their magnetism). With the right alignment of the interior drive magnets and a properly polarized hemisphere casing can be bonded together self enclosed by the casing locking together.
Particulatematter 3 years ago
thats cool what about a full sphire with apposing magnets
busteriky 3 years ago
try something that the magnets would repel, not attract. :)
fleiteh 3 years ago 2
like what? If you think of something, Nobel Prize for you.
Kryptocleric 3 years ago
I was just thinking of another magnet with opposing polarity to the stationary ones.
fleiteh 3 years ago 2
Bismuth or certain types of carbon work well at this. They are reppeled by both north and south poles. Unfortunately it is not very strong of an effect and generally only very tiny pieces in the pressence of very strong magnets can be levitated. It can work though......Ive bought a small demo with (i think) about 4 magnets set a certain way with a piece of carbon that floats....it is very tiny though and kinda hard to see.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
cool!
hotpost101 3 years ago
"Earnshaw's Theorem States that there is no STABLE equilibrium"...
Then why not make an unstable arrangement with a rocker system to compensate?
catcusgreen 4 years ago
Basically the same thing is accomplished with a few models Ive seen. No rockers though just electro magnets and an optical sensor which turns the magnet(s) on or off according to how close the object gets to the magnet... Essentialy making it float.also a coil of wire with AC current will hoover over a thick piece of aluminum.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
This is not overunity. This is a magnetic levitation device. If you introduced a spin to the ball, it would most likely hover for quite a while.
NOT OU!
spokehedz 4 years ago
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM MAN!!!!
The guy never once mentioned overunity. Dude go watch some mtv.
futurehorizon24 4 years ago 7
"Tags: Steorn magnets "
Yes he did! Steorn is all about overunity.
fastsolve 4 years ago
Dude please he did it because the experiment was mentioned on the steorn forum. And who can you possibly think would beleive this is overunity? People like you!!!
futurehorizon24 4 years ago 5
it could work; the problem is that it must be suspended by being repelled; that way, the closer it gets to one magnet, the more it is pushed away, leading to a balance.
johndoe528 4 years ago
ive got an idea kinda of like this. but it hase to do with also arranging magnets on the ball. all magnets on the (plastic)ball would face the same pole outwards and the magnets in the bowl would have the same pole facing inwards.
R0B0duck 4 years ago
i have thought of doing what you just said since i was a child, never tryed it yet. /claps for the idea
matthias2986 4 years ago
check this, take a CD attach magnets several magnets facing - side down around the cd(for instance) then make a table with many many magnets all facing - side up (for instance lol) then spin the CD and let hover over table of magnets. would have to be well balanced, i think it would levitate
matthias2986 4 years ago
It certainly would if properly balanced and with fast enough spin. I had a spinning magnetic top similar to this and it worked. It's really cool to see it levitate.
knoxjeff 4 years ago
that ball bearing would have levitated if it were a superconductor.
roidroid 4 years ago
I don't hear any outrageous claims i think people should open their mind and just look its an experiment not a claim so back off. "if it were not for people trying to break the laws of physics newer laws would not be written and the world would still be flat according to the roman catholic church"
OrganicDrew 4 years ago 2
If you had a load of iron filings, and carefully introduce them to roughly where you think the balance point is, and let them go free, are you not more likely to find it than by hand? Getting a large ball like that right at the point would be tricky.. by using many small particles, chances are greater.
vitr1ol 4 years ago
they woudl stick together and go go twards a mag.
homersparents 4 years ago
It would still not work. Permanent magnets alone can not levitate anything. Earnshaw proved this mathematically back in 1842.
ociemitchell 4 years ago
try to learn english, piefke!!!
1x1johnny 4 years ago
think of it like this. You are trying to ballance a bar on a point. On this bar there is no middle (which seems impossible)but it is permanent magnets we are talking about. Soooo. it will never balance. same principle. except invisible.
R0B0duck 4 years ago
it's like balancing 2 perfectly flat balls on one another.
roidroid 4 years ago
Bowlogna!!!!
yootoobfuckyou 4 years ago
awesome, I would love to see this in the practical application of a friction free magnetic bearing, well you would have to also eliminate air friction with a vacuume to be 100% friction free. Now combine two magnetic bearings as shown above with a brushless AC motor provided by Tesla and you have Over unity power generation because the extreme reduction in friction is then applied to momentum and not heat.
OrganicDrew 4 years ago
Ignoramus! Just because you've eliminated bearing friction doesn't mean you automatically have anything close to 100% efficiency. There is still the resistance of the wire which causes loss. 'Over unity' is a concept used exclusively by the scientifically illiterate and other weak minded nut jobs.
hyperkinetic 4 years ago
Magnetic bearings is not a particularly new invention you know. Patented back in -41 and used in industry since.
matt4magic 4 years ago
You can levitate a magnetic disc when its spinning. There are numerous toys on this principle.
Datacore09 4 years ago
Ernshaws Theorum basically dictates that no arraingment of permanent magnets will result in magnetic levitation without some kind of mechanical anchor, nice try though!
Plataea 4 years ago
Earnshaw's Theorem States that there is no STABLE equilibrium with any arrangement, there is a "sweet spot" but it is unstable, As is stated numerous times by the videographer who does appear to know his stuff and is demonstrating the limited degrees of freedom that can be attained using his configuration
lukechilson 4 years ago
Amaizing deduction!!
CealeX 4 years ago