Edgar Cayce : Legacy of EDGAR CAYCE PART 4 - A.R.E.

[freakoutguitarsolo1]

i dream that i'm in the futur all the time, crazy stuff. really far out stuff. technology that doesnt' even exist yet. like holograms that shock you. android robots that exhale steam but look like humans. ufo's and swastika's all sorts of shit.

[earthsoulful]

@freakoutguitarsolo1 Maybe youre seeing the future, like a "seer"...

[Delisle4]

Thank you for posting these videos. I think that too often we try to live a life that is meant to emulate what society thinks we should be doing instead of living a life of purpose. I have made an effort to live my life with purpose and let go of many material ting and the desperate need for love relationships. in doing so I feel like a great weight has been lifted and find pleasure learning more about my experiences in life with examples in Edgar Cayce's readings. Namaste.

[OkinawaShorinryu]

thanks for sharing these

[cheat123]

man i wish there was a cayce now in days

[dgontar]

And to be clear, by "choice" I mean to refer to the action of the agent (the rat or person). So when I speak of the choice being derived from itself, by this I mean a thought or action of an agent which is derived from within that agent, thus implying true responsibility. IE, if the thought or act is derived from itself, it is derived from the agent.

[eileansiar]

Wonderful brief introduction to the phenomenon of Edgar Cayce's remarkable abilities. There IS free will even for those who use their free will to deny it. You cannot prove something does not exist. Every dream is a spiritual adventure in self-discovery.

[sundayweiss44]

this is a example of for those who believe no proof is necessary, for those who do not no proof would be sufficient.

[dgontar]

There's no free will.

[sundayweiss44]

there is only free will, you have willingly given up.

[dgontar]

Free will usually refers to the ability of, say, person A, to make moral decisions in the sense that these decisions are ontologically derived, or for the most part ontologically derived, from person A. The question is, if this is the reality, why is it that there are no other actions or thoughts, as far as we can see in this discourse, of a non-moral nature which are claimed to be ontologically derived from person A?

[dgontar]

...In other words, why was person A unable to choose his hair color, height, intelligence, abilities, etc., but somehow he was able to make a "moral choice"? There must be something unique about moral choices, but what is it?

[sundayweiss44]

who would person b, b? next what does free will have to do with a moral choice. people choose with education to enhance intelligance, with hair dye, their hair color.

[dgontar]

I know that you didn't mention moral choices, but I brought it up because whenever people speak of free will it is within the context of a discussion of either religion or ethics, and really in no other context. The reason for this is that they want to show that if a person does something bad, or better, a particular type of bad thing (say abortion) that they are responsible for this bad act. And it is only through the reality of...

[dgontar]

... free will that we can claim a person is truly responsible for a thought or what may follow from a thought, an act. If you're not understanding what I mean by free will, it basically means, as it applies to the practical milieu, an act or thought (and these are termed events) which either essentially (the most part) or entirely caused itself to occur. Sounds kind of ridiculous doesn't it when you think about it?...

I'm not sure what you mean by asking who person b is.

[dgontar]

...The reasons why it is ridiculous and possibly not worthy of complete philosophic attention is because the only apparent bases to the assertion of the existence free will that we find are found in either (1) a fallacious appeal to emotion (and that emotion is often revenge or anger) or (2) a dogmatic religious argument, in other words, a barren assertion with no logical content, and these two are often seen together. Furthermore, God created a real autonomous free will, it also seems...

[dgontar]

...implausible to suggest that it exists, but that it is not compatible with logic or cannot be at least roughly explained by logic.

[dgontar]

(correction) "[if] God created a real autonomous free will..."

[weisscorey89]

Well, not just moral choices I guess I was thinking about in regards to free will, I mean its like a rat runs a maze to get to thecheese, or a person does not reach forfire once they have already been burned. those are free will choices, but not moral one.

[dgontar]

How are those choices essentially derived from themselves, or purely derived from themselves? Aren't they caused mainly by forces outside of those agents (rats, people) you mentioned?

[firelovelight]

I think we can only control our reaction to things /attitude and thoughts. I'd agree with you here.

[WillIAMSUCCESSFUL]

I love Edgar Cayce I have read so many book's about him,He was

a Gift from God.

[ilovelasagna]

What a Grace and BLESSING to watch, experience and learn from the videos that you post on the internet! Thank you!!!

[CHIEFJB]

thanks for the video

[cnj4200]

Great Man! I love learning about him. Thanks for the info!

[alexdu07]

awesome

[IntentionalDreams]

Awesome!!

[samlit78]

Is a Grat Profet...i Think..Thanks for the Videos...