Added: 3 years ago
From: feministcampus
Views: 4,570
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Why does this guy support pro-choice? He doesn't have any choice if his baby is going to be murdered or not if the woman he got pregnant wants to kill her and his baby in the womb.

  • Comment removed

  • Wow, I just lost respect for some of the people on this video that I loved watching on tv. Thanks for posting this so I know who not to support anymore.

  • Mark my words. You murder. There will be retribution. Woman do not have the right to murder.

  • wooohoooo go Colorado we defeated amendment 48 with 74%!

  • The "rap" in this video is comical! How arrogant to think WE are the ones who create life!! There is only ONE Creator of Life and that is Jesus Christ. Simply more proof that our pride overshadows our compassion.

  • "right", to kill a baby. "choice", to end

    the life of an innocent and defenseless

    human being. REPENT AND STOP

    PROMOTING THIS GARBAGE.

  • How'd this thing turn out? Care to update your video description with the results?

  • vote no on 48?

    um how about no?

    keep ur legs closed if u don't want children.

  • What do you mean by saying, "Don't send girls back to the back alley?" I have a question for everyone who reads this comment: If you went back in time and met your mother and father right after your mother realized she was pregnant, would you support their choice if they chose abortion?

  • If my mom had been abused by her dad...if she had been raped, if she had a lifehreatening condition ...yes, you bet your ass I would have supported her choice.

  • If your mom was fooling around when she was was 18 and accidently got pregnant, wouldn't you have preferred her to have you adopted rather than killed because she simply "made a mistake?"

  • And also, you think that just because your mom was abused and raped, that you don't deserve a chance to live? Those things don't effect the unborn child and their right to life.

  • Have you ever been raped?Were you abused by a relative when you were a teen?Have been pregnant and told that your life is in danger if you you carry on with your pregnancy? How easy it is to tell women what to do when there's no chance you'll ever have to go through the problems some of them have to go. Typical intolerant, selfish view of life of a conservative republican.

  • You don't get it. This is not about what happens to the mother. Rape and abuse are horrible things but should not justify the killing of unborn fetuses. Also, I am not intolerant, selfish, conservative or a republican. I simply believe in the right to life.

  • Again, what about the right to life of the mother? If you say not even a life threatening condition justifies an abortion, you're not just crazy, you're a hypocrite.

  • You keep changing the subject. I think that a life-threatening condition for the mother would be the only sufficient reason for an abortion. That is the one time that I believe it would be morally acceptable. You don't need to go about accusing me of being a hypocrite, conservative, etc. because you have no idea who I am and it does nothing to support your point.

  • You do realize an amendment like this would have prevented abortions even in those cases, don't you?

  • In the Declaration of Independence, did it not state "...that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Pro-choice is another excuse for 'murder'-killing of an INNOCENT DEFENSELESS baby, however you don't believe that a GUILTY MURDERER shall receive the death penalty? It is inhumane, and if you choose to abort, I'll be more than happy to pay your 1 way ticket to Russia.

  • Lets say you pass under a bridge from point A to point B. When you reach point B, you are the EXACT same person you were at point A.

    A child is a person. It is the same person that was in the womb during labor and the same person in the doctor's arms.

    If it's not a baby then you aren't pregnant.

  • so vote NO on the fact that we are NOT PERSONS?? then what the hell are we??? OH right, we are only a person when a women and her doctor say we are persons...HMMM change the word person to JEW and we have hitler all over again.

  • first off y

    y would u blame a innocent live creature on something they did not do

    i believe this whole heartily if the woman wants an abortion then she has to be killed as well

  • I love abortion. Its the best way to reduce the poor, the black and the Mexican from our population. Vote NO NO NO NO NO. Terminate those little bastard sub humans.

  • Hmm, ironic. They'll try to change the definition of a person to fit their moral views, but they're against changing the definition of marriage because it's changing "tradition".

  • This is more than just about abortion, this is about birth control, infertility, and the right for a mother to chose. We should not tell one couple they cannot prevent pregnancy by getting an IUD, and another couple they cannot have a baby through IVF. And what about the mother of 4 who has cancer, but cannot accept life saving chemotherapy because it will miscarry her 3 week old fetus? Do we have the right to kill a mother for a fetus that may not even make it to term??

  • respect life by not killing fetuses which from the point of conception turn into little people...not about choice, not about women's rights, not about politics, all about the baby

  • how sad - let's lay off personal attacks, semantics, etc...keep in mind that a pregnant woman (not chick) has a baby--not a jackass, not a pineapple, not a monkey, pregnant women have little people growing in them...let's keep it simple yo

  • Yea let us Kill All the kids we want to. Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill.

  • when is a baby a baby? life begins at the point of conception...if a chick is pregnant we don't say, oh you're having a monkey--we know that the end product will be a baby human...am i missing something here? bottom line is that it's all about babies, not abortions, not choices, not pro or anti anything, it's just about babies and when does their life begin? comprende?

  • Wow. You just used the word 'chick' to define a WOMAN. You suck. And 48 is about fertilization, not conception.

  • @surferdog666 Just an FYI... conception = fertilization. We're people and as such, we use words to express our thoughts/feelings, therefor,it is extremely important to understand the words we use.

    Conception: the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization (the process of union of two gamets - ova & sperm), implantation or both.

  • i'm speaking up, i'm acting up, and i'm voting up on this amendment by voting YES to stop killing babies. that's how easy this whole thing is to vote on - vote to kill babies or vote to not kill babies? seems simple to me...let's not kill black babies, latino babies, babies of any color, gender, sexual orientation, let's just stop the killing? rap on that my brutha!

  • And YES to kill women! Loser. And you sound like a man, too. Quit trying to oppress women.

  • Defining a person, no different from defining inheritance, is needed to keep many laws enforceable.

    Say you WANT A baby- and a robber stabs you and kills your 9 month old baby- then what? You'd be screaming for the death penalty right? At least for him/her to rot in jail forever... Today- all he/she did was stab "you" and does 3-6 months in jail "maybe" for assault!

    Stop being sheep and think for yourselves. READ The simple- common sense- amendment.

  • Thank you!

    Good comments!!

  • This vote is about DEFINING A PERSON, not abortion! If you are pre-born (up to the second of having your cord cut) you have no rights today! Anti-48 people are only spewing the abortion industry's dusty old rhetoric that keeps fear and ignorance feeding their profit margin.

  • Your time to choose is when you have sex, Not after! Killing a baby is not birth control! More women DIE FROM ABORTIONS 8:1 than from a very RARE tube-pregnancy. There is NEVER a reason that a woman's health is "at risk". However, there is "ALWAYS" a reason that an abortionist's cash is at risk when you choose life instead of death.

  • people die in surgery as well.

    In alomst any medical procedure there's a risk of death.. as you said 'bout having sex being the choice. Alot of cases the woman isn't just going around spreading her legs saying "Come on in the waters fine." It can be as much as a broken condom or a miss in pills.

  • You know, if they did define personhood from the time of conception then what would happen in those very rare cases where the pregnancy did threaten the mother's life? Very rare does not equal never.

    The mother would have to go to court and plead self-defence. What about the doctors who helped her? They weren't in any danger, it was just the mother that was in danger. What protection do they have?

  • I do want children someday, but I take the Pill because I know I can't afford to have any right now. This bill will take away my right to plan for the family I want in the future.

    Mistakes happen. Telling people to just be celibate doesn't work.  Condoms rip. And women get raped. This amendment takes away our backup plan for when those happen and takes away our right to decide when to have a family. I am voting N-O.

  • Ok have you read the bill?? All it does is clarify when a person becomes a person.

    Besides just becuase the parents made a mistake doesn't mean they have to take someone else's life. There are options like giving the child up for adoption.

    Read the book "Why pro-life" It's not long at all. Read it and then tell me what you think

  • Awesome video - glad 48 is getting national attention. If it passes, in vitro fertilization, emergency contraception, hormonal birth control, etc could all be things of the past. It's just so extreme!

  • 48 could outlaw emergency contraception, the birth control pill, and other methods of birth control because they can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus.

    No on 48

  • A woman with cancer could be refused

    life-saving medical treatment because it could put a fertilized egg in danger.

    No on 48

  • So are we going to stop those unable to speak for themselves? A unborn child can not beg you to save them. I don't think it is about taking away a womans right, its telling them to be responsable. What happened to personal responsibilty? I know there are extream cases, but they are just that extream. I am pro-life, 27 and a woman.

  • Great video. I can't wait to see the idiocy of 48 voted down in November.

  • If your so "pro-choice" then why don't you let the baby's have a choice?

  • Because pro-choice follows on the WOMAN'S right to choose. Not some clump of UNBORN NOT ALIVE cells. Maybe your parents should've practiced contraception instead of letting you choose.

  • Ok have you read the bill?? All it does is clarify when a person becomes a person.

    Besides just becuase the parents made a mistake doesn't mean they have to take someone else's life. There are options like giving the child up for adoption.

    Read the book "Why pro-life" It's not long at all. Read it and then tell me what you think

  • because the egg is just a bundle of cells.

    killing it is just like smashing a bug it doesn't think for itself.

    IT'S NOT MURDER because it's not fully alive yet.

  • OK so when do you consider a person becoming a "person"?

    And that "bundle of cells" already has it's very own unique DNA.

    What about mental people or even just infants, they can't think for themselves. They are living in someone else's care. Does that make them less of a person?

  • Yes it does.

    If an Animal (Which as humans we are still animals) Dies in such a way it doesn't need to procreate. Retardation is terrible and Infant mortality is not a good thing either.

    It's not that I have no sympathy for such a thing.

    A person is a living Organism on this side of the womb.

    I eat chicken eggs everyday. It's no difference from a Chicken egg. It has not been birthed so it isn't alive

  • So you are saying that until something it birthed or hatched it is not alive?

  • Look techinically yes its alive. But it's not aware of world around it. So killing it is not like killing some dude on the street.

    Murder would mean it's at least taken it's frist breathe

  • Well an abortion kills the baby before it can take a breath. Just because they don't know their surrounding doesn't mean they are not a person. The bill does not ban abortion. Have you read the bill?? It's a sentence long!

  • Here is all that the bill is:

    Shall there be an ammendment to the Colorado constitution defining the term "person" to unclude any human being from the moment of fertilization as a "person" is used in those provisions of the Colorado constitution relating to inalienable rights, equalty of justice, and due process of law??

  • or we can protect human rights and the unborn, but then you wouldn't get the praises of hollywood stars.

  • Thank God for Celebrities and the media telling us how we should vote. That way we don't need to think for ourselves.

  • GREAT VIDEO! We all need to turn out and help protect women's right to not only choose birth control but also her right to seek an abortion. Beyond that, this legislation is down-right ugly.

    SAY NO TO 48!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more