98% of dislikes(from atheists of course) probably didn't even watch the videos, they just go around and dislike and vomit Hitchens' quotes in the comments begging for thumbs up..
Get a life losers, instead of trying to prove something wrong you don't believe in, go out and live. Besides, this is the only one you have, right?
The nuclear reactions in the center of the sun are complex, I don't understand them so they must be designed. That is why I believe in Ra the Sun God !
@gregrutz You like many other retards don't understand that a christian believes in God, God the creator of not just things on earth but, of all the universe and every thing in it including the sun and its complexety. So yes they are a design and its true you will never understand them, for it is not your place to understand, but to beleive without seeing.
@earlydecember77 said "So yes they are a design and its true you will never understand them, for it is not your place to understand, but to beleive without seeing. "
-So you just have to have blind unsupported faith?
"God the creator of not just things on earth but, of all the universe and every thing in it"
- The bible supports a geocentric God who only cares about earthlings and not a universal one who cares about the other 99.99999999999999999999% if his creation.
@DisprovingEvolution said "I think the intelligent people voting in the comment section decided who is right (me) and who is wrong (pooverse)"
-oh you mean your two other troll accounts that you use to up vote yourself MR Disproveevoluiton AND evoTardareInsane. Fucking pathetic moron. pooverse is an inside joke with my friends.
@Pooverse You seem to lack understanding of the fundamentals. My humble answer with open research studies for 40 years has concluded that Evolution is false. For the most part people who disregard God/Evolution are either ignorant, or dont want a God,or cannot believe in his reality. Inorder to claim evolution is true you must give an answer as to how Plants and Animals have evolved and why there is such Diversity among them.Darwin made this up when we had no technology in his lifetime
@DisprovingEvolution said "Could you have a more ignorant and childish screen name?"
-Could you? Pooverse is actually derived from a pretty sound argument against bigbangaphobes Sure it's childish but so is believing in an all know, all loving, invisible sky daddy, who telepathically speaks to you, and spook a magical incantation to poof the universe into existence.
Know what else is childish upvoting yourself to appear like people support you.
"Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development."
and your evidence for it.
Instead of up-voting your own evidence-less posts, SHOW me how I am wrong SHOW me your evidence for this "unique to human development." fusion. All your underhanded up-voting and down-voting only show that you'd rather play dirty politics and bury the evidence, instead of ACTUALLY discussing it.
@DisprovingEvolution said "I think the intelligent people voting in the comment section decided who is right (me)"
-It would take me 10 minutes to create three more youtube accounts and up vote myself. And even if you weren't up-voting yourself. I'm on a video that attracts you anti-evolution types. So being down voted here and having you up-voted proves nothing but your home court advantage. Have this discussion on a evolution video and see who gets up-voted
For those who still deny evolution, I have devised a way that the basic mechanics of evolution can be demonstrated. It's a process involving lots dice, but it works every time. I am not a scientist, except in the ways i come to conclusions, and as such it is very simplified but the principals of evolution are represented, ie. environmental change and adaptation. If anyone's interested i will post a video, but you must like this comment otherwise how will i know?
It's ridiculous that we evolve from a primate, we're also 50% raccoon if u go by dna. So does that mean we evolved from a raccoon as well. All life shares all dna, atoms and molecules partly because we all evolve from the original lifeform created by thought from another higher dimension. Believe what u want but the truth is the truth!
@Pooverse Where is your proof we evolved from primates? Show me the missing link u all believe in. Why do u suppose they haven't found the missing link yet, Darwin's religious theory has put mankind back in the dark ages do u still wanna be stupid and blind forever.
@quizmasterdave said "Where is your proof we evolved from primates?"
-DNA, retro viruses, hundreds of Neanderthal fossils. Not to mention the half a dozen or so other hominid type fossils we have found like Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo heidelberg, Homo erectus, ect ect.
-You gonna answer my question now?
"Darwin's religious theory has put mankind back in the dark ages"
- The biologists that use the theory of evolution to create vaccines and antibiotics would disagree.
@Pooverse Explain why we have less chromosones than a chimp, hair that grows on the opposite parts of a human to a chimp, completely different bone structure, rib cage to any hominid or primate. If we evolved from primates why haven't we eradicated illnesses which in the animal kingdom overcome over evolutionary time scale. Surely we should have less not 100's times more? if u can answer this simple last question then i will debate with you further.
@quizmasterdave so you're not gonna answer my question you're just gonna force me to anwser more your ignorant ones...*sighs* ok.... but after this you're gonna have to give me evidence.
@quizmasterdave said "Explain why we have less chromosones than a chimp"
-That's a very good question, why do we have TWO fewer chromosomes. Well if they just disappeared that would be lethal, so we should be able to find evidence of them in our genome if evolution is true AND WE DO.Chromosome #2 resulted from a fusion of two chromosomes, we should also be able to find those two chromosomes in the chimp genome if evolution is true and WE DO.
@quizmasterdave said "hair that grows on the opposite parts of a human to a chimp"
-Hair growth patters are NOT that constant for either species to make that assertion. Hair growth pattern can vary drastically even from parent to offspring, so hair growth is a poor barometer for evolution.
"completely different bone structure"
-NO a human and an eel have a COMPLETELY different bone structure. Humans and chimps have all the same bones, which are slightly modified.
@quizmasterdave said "If we evolved from primates why haven't we eradicated illnesses"
-Well just like we evolve, germs, bacteria, and viruses evolve too. Some viruses are actually QUITE good at evolving. For instance HIV, which is sooo good at evolving that it is constantly becoming immune to our drugs, which is one of the main reasons it is so difficult.
"Surely we should have less not 100's times more?"
-You're gonna have to clarify this question. 100 times more what?
Oh things look designed therefore they are. Er need a little bit more proof than that for some invisible undetectable creator. All things proposed as irreducibly complex have so far been explained through evolution. Pretty week and in no way proves evolution wrong. Try again.
Here is a LIST of scientists (with videos on Youtube) that say evolution is BULLSHIT and Intelligent Design is the more LOGICAL explanation for all life. Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Michael Behe, Dr. David Berlinski, Dr. John Morris, Dr. Rick Oliver, Dr. Ian Macreadie, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Jonathan Safarti, Dr. Ann Gauger, and Dr. Stephen Meyer
MOST of those scientists ^ have PHD degrees in the field of Biology (unlike Darwin who had NO DEGREE IN BIOLOGY)__FACT
Evo-CLOWNS want us to "believe" that single celled organisms (which magically arose from NON LIFE in a fantasy process called abiogenesis) then miraculously transitioned into plant life, then insect life, followed by aquatic plant life and aquatic animal life, then land mammalian life, and finally us bipedal Homo Sapiens (which are still Homo Sapiens after 200,000 years of supposed evolution).
Wow, and I thought the tooth fairy and Santa Claus sounded like BULLSHIT.
Further DISPROVING evolution is the sexual reproduction problem. If a truly new species arose from a pre-existing species then that DNA-defying mutation which caused such a macroevolutionary transformation would also have to occur in a member of the opposite sex in order for that newly evolved species to produce more of its kind.
The Cambrian Explosion, Living Fossils, the inability of mutations to add large amounts of new information to the genome, Irreducible Complexity of individual organs, the LACK of intermediate fossils bridging the gaps between separate family classifications, Specified Complexity, the FAILURE of all experiments attempting to cause single-celled organisms to become multicellular, the Origin of Bats, and the FAILURE of all experiments attempting to cause abiogenesis
@knuckleheadh2o the issue is how life ends.. & then what? Athiests might view death as switching off a light bulb, in which case, who cares about death, life is meaningless. But Christians care for the lives of others because we understand that this is not all there is. Life goes on, Eternal Life, or Eternal Punishment. God is not willing that any should perish, but apart from Him there can be no life, for God is Life. Those who reject Jesus are cast into the Lake of Fire, which is the 2nd Death
@ChristusVlCTOR yeah, I am a Christian, It is just that I wish that this ongoing war between evolution and creationism would stop. If you don't like creationism just ignore it instead of attacking it. or vice versa. And always remember science can be proven wrong like in the past
@GoldenCrusader93 no not all evolution. Most believers in creation dispute the notion that ONE kind of creature can "become" a completely different creature over time. Evolution within a specie is not disputed. Irreducible complexity is one of many proofs of creation.
@Moralityman said "Evolution within a specie is not disputed."
-Good so you should have no problem with the FACT humans are part of the great ape species.
"Irreducible complexity is one of many proofs of creation."
-No it's not. The first simple cell could have road in on an asteroid then evolved. All this proves is that modern cells are more complex than ancient cells. Just because modern cells are complex does NOT mean the first ancient cells were too.
alan....copy and paste the link below to your browser (remove the "dot" and spaces) and then read that article from that journal......
journalofcosmology (dot) com/Commentary203.html
^^ The link above deals with INCREASING complexity of all life here on Earth which has dramatically increased since the primitive life forms of the pre-historic era.
ALL scientists (including Darwinists) agree 100% that the complexity has increased exponentially.
I guess thats why they ignore the DNA evidence and fossil record which CLEARLY shows genetic manipulation took place.
Factor in LAB PROVEN extraterrestrial implants and the lab findings on surgical mutilations in areas of high UFO activity and its obvious this biosphere (Earth) is a science project for beings from elsewhere.
No evolution and no creationism. Fallacies
The "soul" may come from God, but physical life forms obviously come from engineering
Both Louis and Kumar have published numerous papers on the Red Rain of Kerala in 2006, 2008, and 2010 showing documented evidence the cells inside that rain are not normal, terrestrial cells in any shape or form
The only main challenger of their claims is the Government of India (quite ironic) that have ZERO evidence or convincing data to support THEIR hypothesis.
Its a classic case of "scientists" disagreeing with each other. But its obvious Louis and Kumar have more DATA on THEIR side!!!
@buffboynick "The only main challenger of their claims is the Government of India (quite ironic) that have ZERO evidence or convincing data to support THEIR hypothesis." Untrue. The scientists at the Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute grew the spores in a culture and got them to germinate, dyed them and examined their genetic material.
Louis/Kumar tried to dye the spores without growing them, the cell membranes remained intact, not accepting dye. So they saw no genetic material
The Government of India COMMISSIONED 2 separate groups to investigate and one was the TBGR so I was 100% right. They did the study on behalf of the Indian government. "The CESS report noted that they could find no satisfactory explanation for the apparently extraordinary dispersal, nor for the apparent uptake of the spores into clouds. CESS scientists noted that "While the cause of the color in the rainfall has been identified, finding the answers to these questions is a challenge"
@buffboynick "...ne was the TBGR so I was 100% right." only if you misread my statement. You claimed that "...they have ZERO evidence..." THAT is the statement to which I was referring when I said "Untrue," NOT that the government of India had TBRG perform the research. Again, they DID have evidence, so your statement that they had ZERO evidence was untrue.
Google Skeptoid 4224 Red Rain has fallen several times since 2001 and the botanists have found the same Trentepohlia spores every time.
1) Even if it is true that CESS "..could find no satisfactory explanation..." it means they could find "no satisfactory explanation", not "hey, it is Pansperia!" Look up the argument from ignorance.
2) I am NOT arguing that Panspermia does not exist if you define Panspermia to me precursors of life of biologically active material coming to earth on meteors. That is NOT the same as saying Ancient Astronauts caused it and it says NOTHING about the TOE.
@buffboynick The TBGR grew the spores in medium, stained them, and then examined their genetic material. The statement "The microorganism isolated from the red rain of Kerala shows very extraordinary characteristics, like the ability to grow optimally at 300°C (572°F) and the capacity to metabolize a wide range of organic and inorganic materials" in Wikipedia is immediately followed by "These claims and data have yet to be verified and reported in any peer reviewed publication"
@buffboynick "The only thing that could disprove this would be finding terrestrial life that can replicate under those temperature extremes" Once again, you ignore the FACT that even if this was of extra-terrestrial origin, and even if there was evidence that this type of event was the origin of life on earth, neither piece of information would show the theory of evolution to be wrong. The TOE explains the diversity, not the origin of life. Also, Panspermia would not be evidence of AA theory.
Everything you need to know is right there for you....
DNA similarities in all living things (except for the part of our Homo Sapien DNA that remains "unexplained") and the lack of shared ancestor fossils showing SOURCE of origin
Evolutionists cant even agree on the "shared ancestor" of birds (type in Origin of birds in Wikipedia)
Our "shared ancestor" (technically known as the CHLCA, which is also on Wikipedia) doesnt exist. We come from a LAB
@buffboynick "We come from a LAB" There is no evidence for that, but since you like playing word games, where did the beings working in the lab come from? If we came from a lab, was it in our current form? If so, then how did Panspermia play any role? Why does Red Rain mean anything? If not, then did we evolve once we got here?
I do not wish to promote a false dichotomy by claiming that you are either a troll or an idiot since, it appears, you are both.l
I didnt know that pointing out the FACT that no shared ancestor exists, has been found, nor ever will be found is a "word game"
Its the facts. Also if the CHLCA did exist.....its fossils would be EASIER to find then its supposed sub-species (like neanderthal fossils which are NUMEROUS)
The lack of any shared ancestor and LACK of the billions to trillions of transitional features showing one fossil becoming another shows obvious gene hybridization/modification in a LAB.
@buffboynick "Its the facts. Also if the CHLCA did exist.....its fossils would be EASIER to find then its supposed sub-species (like neanderthal fossils which are NUMEROUS)"
as for the 1st extraterrestrial life form to exist in this universe (the 3rd dimension).....
It was said that the 1st race of extraterrestrial came from another dimension (which means it was actually not an extraterrestrial but an inter-dimensional being)
and it didnt show up as a "single-celled organism" either. It was supposedly fully-formed just like all new species that mysteriously emerge in the fossil record.
No evolution, just a genetic engineering "domino effect". LOGIC
Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering.
Geneticists use Chromosome Fusion all the time in order to genetically engineer plants, vegetables, food, etc. Its one of the main techniques used in the process of genetic modification.
And if you have 45 minutes I suggest watch the video below that shows evidence it was done to genetically engineer Homo Sapiens.....
@DisprovingEvolution said "Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering."
-NO it doesn't. Fusion is a common occurrence in all NATURAL evolution as-well. If chromosome fusion was something we ONLY observed in genetic engineering you might have a point but it isn't so you don't.
Chromosome 2 is not just any typical Chromosome. Its affects brain development. Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development.
Had you bothered to research this topic (instead of spewing fallacies like the typical evolutionist) you'd know that geneticists use chromosome fusion in genetic engineering to make hybrids foods/plants and now in the UK animal-human hybrids for research. PWNED!
Oh, a fusion of one of the other, unimportant, chromosomes would not suggest genetic engineering, but only that of the atypical Chromosome 2? Did you sniff petrochemicals for fun at one time or is your defective brain due to some genetic engineering experiment?
@DisprovingEvolution "Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering."
Actually, it does not. The TOE posits that humans and other apes share a common ancestor. When it was discovered that humans have 46 chromosomes and the other apes have 48, there were two possibilities: 1) the TOE was wrong or 2) that we had a fused chromosome. This was a test of the TOE that could not be performed for years and yet the results, once again, supported evolution.
evolution a religion?..are u fucking insane?..it's a branch of science. expert scientists study and dedicate their lives to understanding evolution. u are fucking clueless.
Seriously, I mean truly research all aspects of Darwinian theory. Even read "Origin of Species" by Darwin (especially the parts where shows the NUMEROUS flaws in the theory)
Many scientists like Dr David Berlinksi and Dr John Morris have exposed the fallacy that is the theory of evolution (thoroughly disproving it)
There any many videos even better then this one ^^^ that expose the house of cards that evolution truly is. Upon examination....its indeed a DUMB religion
flaws in the origin of species?!..the book was written in the 1800s!!...the theory of evolution has profoundly progressed since then..it has done nothing but gain steam in the scientific community. only a fringe handful of religiously motivated people speak out against evolution. and they do so out of ignorance.
all dr. berlinski has done is display his ignorance of evolution. ignorance is not evidence against something.. if u wanna learn about evolution, learn from scientists!
the scientific theory that not only disproves evolution (and has actual FACTS to support it, unlike evolution) is called "ancient astronaut theory"
Its now possible for us humans to create animal-human hybrids__FACT. They are currently doing this in the UK but it was made illegal by the USA congress a few years ago
We (us Homo Sapiens) are the result of an alien lab experiment. And truth be told.....its not even that hard to create life and do gene splicing because we can do it
u know things. but, u obtain your knowledge from terrible sources. there's no evidence to support evolution?..what fuckin planet do u live on?..99.8% of earth and life scientists on this globe accept evolution..the theory of evolution explains and ties together all that we find about life. evolutionary theory is actually applied to fighting disease and upgrading pesticides. why is this applied?..because insects and bacteria EVOLVE.
u simply do not understand evolution..u started off not understanding it, and instead of learning about evolution from science textbooks and lectures, u educated yourself via youtube videos. youtube videos featuring religiously motivated fringe figures..people who aren't expert earth and life scientists don't properly understand evolution..then, they spread their own ignorance and misconceptions around to the public, and u listen to them like they know what they are talking about.
Dr David Berlinski and Dr. John Morris are 2 REAL SCIENTISTS (unlike you) that DISPROVED evolution a LONG time ago__FACT
Even Wikipedia disproves evolution.....go to Wikipedia and type in "CHLCA"
Go read all about your MYTHICAL monkey-man god. If evolution was renamed "magical mutation theory" (which is exactly what it is) then I guaranteer you wouldnt "believe" in it.
You belong to a RELIGION. The Religion of Neo-Darwinism. Get educated kid.
"David Berlinski (born 1942) is an American educator and author of several books on mathematics. Berlinski is a Senior Fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, a religious "think-tank" that is hub of the intelligent design movement."
he sure has the credentials to challenge the vast majority of earth and life scientists..he has no formal education in the earth and life sciences, yet, u listen to him and not the experts..get your head out of your ass.
i didn't purposely leave it out..i just didn't read far enough down..but, he's still biased..he starts out with this firm belief that life needs an intelligent designer. so, he cherry picks everything to support that..but, evolution can explain how complexity can emerge without an intelligence..and how life can drastically change over many years.
u don't understand evolution, so u deem it as far fetched..the same way ancient people who deem flying airplanes as far fetched since they don't understand the science of flight..what exactly is magical about mutations?..dna replicates itself..many times, there are copying errors (mutations)..most are neutral, many are damaging, and then there's the rare beneficial mutation..the beneficial mutations are kept, and passed on to the next generations.
I understand the inept and FLAWED theory of evolution BETTER then you do!!!
They say we (Homo Sapiens) diverged in lineage from an ancestor that we shared with chimpanzees and neanderthals__FACT
Thats the theory ^^^
There is ZERO proof of this RELIGION. Understand?
Whats there is proof of is genetic tampering with life forms by and advanced race (or races). There's no "conspiracy" its all in the DNA evidence and fossil record
and listen to yourself.."try looking at the REAL scientific data"..what, the opinions of fringe figures?..if these people have proved evolution wrong, why aren't they winning awards?..why aren't they publishing papers in peer reviewed journals?..why aren't they getting attention from expert evolutionary biologists?..why is it that 99.8% of scientists on the earth accept evolution?..why do u listen to the fringe figures about evolution, and not the evolutionary biologists?
He is a GREAT example of great science. Research the data on "red rain" by the scientists in the BBC documentary "We Are the Aliens"
You evolutionists are experts at "cherry picking" and deceiving the public. Luckily men like me have exposed your RELIGION and propaganda for the biased NONSENSE it truly is.
lemme guess why..because u believe that the 99.8% of experts that support evolution are part of a wolrd wide conspiracy to falsely perpetuate evolution as true?
we don't cherry pick evidence..science just doesn't work like that..the theory of evolution, like all scientific theories, gather ALL of the available facts, and see where ALL of the evidence points..it accounts for all of the evidence..it explains all of the evidence..science works like a true investigation..it doesn't start with a conclusion..it lets the evidence build the conclusion..
radical species transforming mutations? lol..of course not. evolution doesn't work like that u fool..it works very very gradually..mutations are usually always very small changes to the genome..after a LONG time, these small changes lead to large change..u DON'T understand how evolution works.
No once again.....both the fossil record and DNA evidence show that 'small mutations" (as you evolutionists call it, when in reality its just unstable cells) CANNOT produce the radical difference in species!!!! Not even over the course of BILLIONS of years!!!
Homo Sapiens 1st appeared at least 200,000 years ago, co-existed with Neanderthals, and still exist today and have NOT "magically mutated" into a NEW species__FACT. That is hundreds of THOUSANDS OF YEARS!!!
we share thousands of ERV's with chimps..ERV's couldn't have randomly infected human and chimp chromosomes in the same exact locations thousands of different times..humans and chimps must have inherited these ERV's from a common ancestor from which we both branched..
Great....the find the "common ancestor" you religious believer lol.
There are no "random, accidental, chance mutations" that can TRANSFORM one species into a NEW one__FACT.
ONLY genetic manipulation can do that. They used genetic splicing, genetic hybridization, and gene removal to make us!!!!
Alien DNA was mixed with terrestrial ape DNA and then gradually modified and corrected (65 times to be exact) and they removed 12 strands of DNA from the original human genome
evolution is NOT random chance!..the mutations that occur during dna transcription are random, but natural selection, which determines which mutations are beneficial, and which ones are not, is anything but random..hence, natural SELECTION..mutations that aid in survival, are selected for by nature, and traits that do not aid survival, are weeded out thru death.
There are NUMEROUS scientists that support both intelligent design and ancient astronaut theory
Many are featured in the documentary "Expelled" (which is also on Youtube)
Even known evolutionist Richard Dawkins admits that alien genetic engineering is a definite possibility and the video of him saying that is here on YouTube___FACT
natural selection is essentially a weeding out process..this weeding out process has been CONSTANTLY functioning for around 3.5 BILLION years..it has basically unintelligently and unconsciously "designed" life to be suited to the environment..it's all pretty simple..there's nothing magical about it..
1. The oldest known fossil is 3.5 Billion years old__FACT
2. We have found NUMEROUS dinosaur fossils that are 250 MILLION years old__FACT
3. If the CHLCA existed (which it doesnt since MYTHS dont exist) then its fossils would be around 7-10 million years old and would be EASIER to find then the PREVIOUS 2 examples___FACT
Are you done yet? Or should I go into plant evolution (disproven), insect evolution (disproven), and how time doesnt DRASTICALLY alter DNA?
dr. morris is a religious creationist..he's a geologist. he doesn't have a formal education in evolutionary biology. he is the president of the institute for creation research..open your damn eyes..these people have a religious agenda..evolution happens to go against their preconceived religious views, so, they challenge it..does it not matter to u that 99.8% of earth and life scientists around the globe greatly support evolution?..does that just go in one ear and out the other?
are u fucking kidding me?..you're gonna bring up piltdown man and nebraska man like they were conspiracies by evolutionary scientists to perpetuate evolution as true?..the hoaxes were obviously attempts at fame and publicity, not attempts to perpetuate evolution as being true..and how do those 2 hoaxes invalidate the great amount of real hominid fossils?
and who the hell is talking about other life in the universe?..why does the existence of aliens have anything to do with evolution being true or not? and no one says we come from chimps..evolution is based on common ancestry..humans, chimps, gorillas, orangutans, and bonobos all branched off from a single ancestral species.
there's no reasoning with u..this debate is not an example of me defending my "religious" beliefs. it's me defending genuine scientific understanding..it would be the same thing if a bunch of fringe nutjobs started doubting the theory of gravity..and started creating agendas to misinform the public about gravity.
are u fucking kidding me?!..we directly observe bacteria genetically changing. scientists have to upgrade vaccines and cures because diseases are always evolving..farmers have to upgrade pesticides because insects are always evolving..life changes! that's the fact!..the theory of evolution explains HOW life changes..life changes very very gradually. but, many small changes over a very long period of time, equates to large scale change, hence, NEW SPECIES.
Apparently you dont know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution.
Small "MINOR" changes in cells due to reproduction, interactions with viruses/bacteria, and cell breakdown due to aging is NOT "evolution" but examples of cell interactions
The type of Radical macroevolution you Darwinists theorize is not only UNPROVEN but also FANTASY.
Its pure SPECULATION and NOT science!!!
There is ZERO proof of macroevolution and in fact....its ILLOGICAL. Pure nonsense
absolute nonsense..gravity comes from the distortion of space. mass distorts the space around it..less massive objects are then drawn to more massive objects via this distortion..this distortion was proven when scientists discovered that u could see the light from a star even though it was directly behind a planet...this is because the beam of light followed the curvature of space created by the mass of the planet..it's called gravitational lensing.
u tell me to learn from real scientists..i educate myself via the information that's published by peer reviewed science..the information that's in scientific journals..where do u learn science?..from youtube videos by fringe figures who don't properly understand that which they argue against?
Piltdown Man was "peer reviewed" until a NON memeber of the Darwin RELIGION took a closer look.
Also.....the majority of "peer reviewed" science shows more EVIDENCE for genetic engineering then evolution (both the DNA and the fossil record show that)
Apparently you're so devoted to your ape-man MYTH that you fail to understand REAL science
@buffboynick "This is why all planets in our solar system revolve around the sun and NOT Jupiter (which is much closer to us and VERY large)"
Last time you said this, you removed it then said it was a typing error, I find it very unlikely that you could make that kind of retarded mistake twice. This is very good proof you are severely misinformed, and retarded.
endogenous retro viruses effectively prove common ancestry..ERV's are viruses that infect chromosomes. they become dormant, and end up being passed on to the next generations..if your father has an ERV somewhere along his chromosome, u will inherit that chromosome, and the ERV will be in the same exact location on your chromosome and your offsprings, and so on and so on. (cont)
"Do viruses cause "species-transforming" mutations? the answer.....NO"
why the hell WOULD a virus explain such a thing?..endogenous retro viruses display our common ancestry with the other great apes..that's all.
"gaps in the fossil record"...OF COURSE there are gaps in the fossil record. the process of fossilization is very rare..no scientist expects to find all these fossils.
@itzahazylife You are really not very intelligent. The ERV's are virus that attack the germ level of humans. The only cause of mutations on the germ level is from radiation or from virus, bacteria, ,or fungus attacking the egg, sperm or the fetus. Why don't you know this?
it's irrelevant how mutations are caused on the germ level..the fact is, like u said, ERV's attack germ cells. theses ERV's can infect chromosomes, become dormant, and are passed onto subsequent generations..every inheritor of the original possessor, will have the ERV/ERV's in the exact same location along their chromosomes. interestingly enough, chimps and humans share thousands of ERV's, and each ERV is in the exact same locations along both chimp and human chromosomes.
@itzahazylife There is nothing "irrelevant"about germ level mutations. Those are the permanent ones that destroy a species. Germ level ERV's are not a good thing. Every one represents a genetic degradation.
Chimps are a very young species, much younger than humans by either 1.5 million years or 500 thousand years even according to the totally screwed up radiometric dating and there is only one set of fossilized teeth of chimps. We came from the same superior human lineage.
@GoodScienceForYou "We came from the same superior human lineage." That is your hypothesis this week. You keep changing them, not because of new discoveries, but because people show that you do not know what you are talking about. You are a liar and an idiot.
either chimps and humans share a common ancestor from which we both branched, and inherited these ERV's from that common ancestor, or thousands of ERV's happened to randomly infect thousands of the exact same portions of both chimp and human chromosomes. what makes more sense?..come on, you're a smart guy. a basement scientist to be exact. btw, in all seriousness, your music is pretty good..
@itzahazylife The chimp and human connection with DNA evidence only showing genetic degradation makes the chimps some really de-evolved human creatures. We both came from the same superior human ancestors. Go look at the evidence. DNA is absolutely irrefutable evidence of ONLY genetic loss.
Chimps show a total loss of many of their human genes, particularly easy to see in the brain region. HAR-1 has 18 or so mutations of loss.
@GoodScienceForYou "The chimp and human connection with DNA evidence only showing genetic degradation makes the chimps some really de-evolved human creatures." This statement from the IDIOT who claimed that humans mated with gorillas to produce the chimp and claimed that the fusion of human chromosome #2 NEVER happened only to reverse himself. A lying, delusional fool who pretends that he has read 20,000+ peer-reviewed papers on the TOE but does not understand the fundamentals.
and why does it matter that morris is a creationist?..c'mon, think about it..if u have a prior supernatural belief about how life originated and diversified, u will cherry pick things to support that preconceived belief..these people go into learning about evolution after they already believe in creationism..it creates a very biased form of investigation..it causes one to pick and chose evidence.
@buffboynick "If there is so much evidnece for evolution then why do you Darwinists make FAKE FOSSILS like Piltdown Man???"
I didn't have to fake fossils, it's just that I was bored and decided, one evening, to make Piltdown Man. It was easy to fool the scientists; it was the creationist John Morris that led to my downfall. I should have known that I could not fool a real scientist like him. His father proved that the TOE was invented by Satan and Nimrod while standing on the Tower of Babel.
@buffboynick "Then what was your motivation for "Nebraska Man"?"
Well, you know the old saying, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. I thought that I could make an entire family of cavemen from the tooth of an extinct pig. The fact that the only person who bought into it was an artist drawing for The Illustrated London News was disheartening. I convinced the entire scientific community about Piltdown Man, but absolutely no scientists fell for my Nebraska Man hoax. Go figure.
and u keep calling evolution a religion..are u nuts?..is plate tectonic theory a religion?..is germ theory a religion?..is the theory of gravity a religion?..is quantum theory a religion?..the theory of evolution, like all theories, have been constructed via scientific investigation. now for the last time, evolution is a branch of science!..when u learn about evolution, u learn it via text books, not holy books!..u learn it from biologists, not preachers!
it has not become a religion..sure, there's an evolution movement, but, that's only because of religiously motivated people who spread around misinformation and ignorance regarding evolution..a movement was necessary from scientists and citizens to make sure these people didn't distort the science to support their religious agenda. evolution is contradictory to biblical literalism. there's a powerful motivation for the religious to distort the truth science brings fourth.
"BETTER and more credible theories have replaced it (ancient astronaut theory/panspermia)"
lol, panspermia replaces evolution? that doesn't make sense..panspermia explains how life came to be on earth..it states that life was seeded here..but, it doesn't account for the great amount of diversity of life on earth..that's where the theory of evolution comes in..life changes. we know this for a fact. give it billions of years, and it'll change a lot, and gradually gain complexity.
No thats not where magical mutation theory (evolution) comes in....
In fact....both the DNA evidence and the fossil record DISPROVE evolution__FACT.
This info is EASY to find if you examine the theory of evolution closely.
No traceable shared ancestors, no 'real" transitional fossils (which would show billions to trillions of gradual changes as one species becomes a NEW one), no CHLCA, no observable data of "species-transforming" mutations, and NO EMPIRICAL DATA
like i said, u obtain your information from conspiracy theorists, and not scientists..no real transitional fossils?..who says this?..because scientists sure as hell don't say this..there are literally thousands of examples of transitions..there are even living examples..for example the walking catfish..it has both in water and out of water breathing mechanisms, and has primitive type feet.
The Red Rain that fell in India (proving Panspermia) which was featured in the BBC Documentary "We Are the Aliens" is "proof". Which was "peer reviewed" by the way.
Now....how bout you do us all a favor and go look for the CHLCA.....
Go on little pseudo-scientist and look for your MYTHICAL "ape-man" god.
There only thing that has more GAPING HOLES then evolution is your mom :)
You FAIL at life, never have kids "monkey-man believer'
@buffboynick Godfrey Louis hypothesized that the red rain was caused by spores from a meteor, but that was only a hypothesis with little supporting evidence. Try using Google and you can find multiple stories with the correct analysis. Indian government's Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute examined a sample of the Red Rain and found it contained spores from a common, local algae called Trentepohlia.
The mysterious red rain fell for two months in 2001. According to local scientist Godfrey Louis, the rain contains biological cells unlike any he had seen before with no DNA and the ability to replicate at 300°C. Louis has come to the conclusion that the cells are extra-terrestrial in origin.
This find was similar to one by a NASA biologist that recently found living organisms INSIDE meteorites that fell to Earth.
NASA scientist Richard Hoover, whose findings were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Cosmology also found more evidence of extraterrestrial life in 2011. Maybe you can learn how to use "Google" and do a basic internet search. I understand it can be hard for believers in the MYTHICAL 'ape-man' though.
Maybe if you ev-LIE-utionists find the CHLCA people will listen lol. Or find out why Homo Sapiens havent "mutated" into a NEW species since we 1st emerged 200,000 years ago :)
@buffboynick "NASA scientist Richard Hoover, whose findings were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Cosmology also found more evidence of extraterrestrial life in 2011. " We were discussing Louis and his bogus Red Rain claims. You claim that Red Rain in India was panspermia when the evidence shows that it was lichen spores
Primitive life coming on meteors may have seeded earth, but that would not prove ancient astronauts, nor disprove evolution. In any event, you are wrong about Red Rain
If you goto Wikipedia and type in "Red Rain of Kerala" you can read the ENTIRE debate on this which involves multiple scientists all giving their "hypothesis" and NONE having proof its algae nor spores.
In fact only the Government of India says that!!! (according to Wikipedia)
and in 2006 Louis and Kumar published a paper in Astrophysics and Space Science (science journal) once again CONFIRMING Louis's original findings it was a case of PANSPERMIA__FACT
98% of dislikes(from atheists of course) probably didn't even watch the videos, they just go around and dislike and vomit Hitchens' quotes in the comments begging for thumbs up..
Get a life losers, instead of trying to prove something wrong you don't believe in, go out and live. Besides, this is the only one you have, right?
177deerhunter 23 hours ago
ID lost in court, proven to be Creationism.
gregrutz 2 days ago
The nuclear reactions in the center of the sun are complex, I don't understand them so they must be designed. That is why I believe in Ra the Sun God !
gregrutz 4 days ago
@gregrutz You like many other retards don't understand that a christian believes in God, God the creator of not just things on earth but, of all the universe and every thing in it including the sun and its complexety. So yes they are a design and its true you will never understand them, for it is not your place to understand, but to beleive without seeing.
earlydecember77 2 days ago
@earlydecember77 Wow, christians believe in God Crap, I didn't know that, I guess I am really stupid. Thanks for all the info. You changed my life.
Why did your God take 6 days and why did she have to rest?
gregrutz 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@earlydecember77 said "So yes they are a design and its true you will never understand them, for it is not your place to understand, but to beleive without seeing. "
-So you just have to have blind unsupported faith?
"God the creator of not just things on earth but, of all the universe and every thing in it"
- The bible supports a geocentric God who only cares about earthlings and not a universal one who cares about the other 99.99999999999999999999% if his creation.
Pooverse 2 days ago
Evolution is true. Fact.
WFSW32 1 week ago
I think the intelligent people voting in the comment section decided who is right (me) and who is wrong (pooverse)
Pooverse? Could you have a more ignorant and childish screen name?
Read a biology book kiddo. My channel is a great educational resource, I suggest you check it out kiddo.
DisprovingEvolution 1 week ago
@DisprovingEvolution said "I think the intelligent people voting in the comment section decided who is right (me) and who is wrong (pooverse)"
-oh you mean your two other troll accounts that you use to up vote yourself MR Disproveevoluiton AND evoTardareInsane. Fucking pathetic moron. pooverse is an inside joke with my friends.
"Read a biology book kiddo."
-I'm a biology major sweet cheeks.
"My channel is a great educational resource"
-A great source of pseudoscience
Pooverse 1 week ago
@Pooverse You seem to lack understanding of the fundamentals. My humble answer with open research studies for 40 years has concluded that Evolution is false. For the most part people who disregard God/Evolution are either ignorant, or dont want a God,or cannot believe in his reality. Inorder to claim evolution is true you must give an answer as to how Plants and Animals have evolved and why there is such Diversity among them.Darwin made this up when we had no technology in his lifetime
gianissocool 6 days ago
@gianissocool "to claim evolution is true you must give an answer as to how Plants and Animals have evolved and why there is such Diversity"
-That is exactly what evolution does. Explain the diversity of species, through genetic drift, mutation, and natural selection
"My humble answer with open research studies for 40 years has concluded that Evolution is false."
-If evolution is false you must have a better explanation with more substantial evidence. Show me your evidence.
Pooverse 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gianissocool said "You seem to lack understanding of the fundamentals."
-no YOU seem to lack understanding of the fundamentals.
"For the most part people who disregard God/Evolution are either ignorant, or dont want a God,or cannot believe in his reality."
-A. Ignorant of what? B. or don't want a Allah, or Zeus? C. Have no evidence for "his" existence.
"Darwin made this up when we had no technology in his lifetime"
-And when technology caught up it proved he was RIGHT.
Pooverse 6 days ago
@DisprovingEvolution said "Could you have a more ignorant and childish screen name?"
-Could you? Pooverse is actually derived from a pretty sound argument against bigbangaphobes Sure it's childish but so is believing in an all know, all loving, invisible sky daddy, who telepathically speaks to you, and spook a magical incantation to poof the universe into existence.
Know what else is childish upvoting yourself to appear like people support you.
Pooverse 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DisprovingEvolution Lets get back to this
"Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development."
and your evidence for it.
Instead of up-voting your own evidence-less posts, SHOW me how I am wrong SHOW me your evidence for this "unique to human development." fusion. All your underhanded up-voting and down-voting only show that you'd rather play dirty politics and bury the evidence, instead of ACTUALLY discussing it.
Pooverse 1 week ago
@DisprovingEvolution said "I think the intelligent people voting in the comment section decided who is right (me)"
-It would take me 10 minutes to create three more youtube accounts and up vote myself. And even if you weren't up-voting yourself. I'm on a video that attracts you anti-evolution types. So being down voted here and having you up-voted proves nothing but your home court advantage. Have this discussion on a evolution video and see who gets up-voted
Pooverse 1 week ago
For those who still deny evolution, I have devised a way that the basic mechanics of evolution can be demonstrated. It's a process involving lots dice, but it works every time. I am not a scientist, except in the ways i come to conclusions, and as such it is very simplified but the principals of evolution are represented, ie. environmental change and adaptation. If anyone's interested i will post a video, but you must like this comment otherwise how will i know?
AirontheThong 2 weeks ago
Chuck Norris is against evolution.
kidasterorig111 2 months ago
the truth speaks
georgekammar 2 months ago
It's ridiculous that we evolve from a primate, we're also 50% raccoon if u go by dna. So does that mean we evolved from a raccoon as well. All life shares all dna, atoms and molecules partly because we all evolve from the original lifeform created by thought from another higher dimension. Believe what u want but the truth is the truth!
quizmasterdave 2 months ago
@quizmasterdave said "because we all evolve from the original lifeform created by thought from another higher dimension."
-And where is your proof for this?
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
@Pooverse Where is your proof we evolved from primates? Show me the missing link u all believe in. Why do u suppose they haven't found the missing link yet, Darwin's religious theory has put mankind back in the dark ages do u still wanna be stupid and blind forever.
quizmasterdave 4 weeks ago
@quizmasterdave said "Where is your proof we evolved from primates?"
-DNA, retro viruses, hundreds of Neanderthal fossils. Not to mention the half a dozen or so other hominid type fossils we have found like Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo heidelberg, Homo erectus, ect ect.
-You gonna answer my question now?
"Darwin's religious theory has put mankind back in the dark ages"
- The biologists that use the theory of evolution to create vaccines and antibiotics would disagree.
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
@Pooverse Explain why we have less chromosones than a chimp, hair that grows on the opposite parts of a human to a chimp, completely different bone structure, rib cage to any hominid or primate. If we evolved from primates why haven't we eradicated illnesses which in the animal kingdom overcome over evolutionary time scale. Surely we should have less not 100's times more? if u can answer this simple last question then i will debate with you further.
quizmasterdave 4 weeks ago
@quizmasterdave so you're not gonna answer my question you're just gonna force me to anwser more your ignorant ones...*sighs* ok.... but after this you're gonna have to give me evidence.
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
@quizmasterdave said "Explain why we have less chromosones than a chimp"
-That's a very good question, why do we have TWO fewer chromosomes. Well if they just disappeared that would be lethal, so we should be able to find evidence of them in our genome if evolution is true AND WE DO.Chromosome #2 resulted from a fusion of two chromosomes, we should also be able to find those two chromosomes in the chimp genome if evolution is true and WE DO.
WATCH THIS
watch?v=zi8FfMBYCkk
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@quizmasterdave said "hair that grows on the opposite parts of a human to a chimp"
-Hair growth patters are NOT that constant for either species to make that assertion. Hair growth pattern can vary drastically even from parent to offspring, so hair growth is a poor barometer for evolution.
"completely different bone structure"
-NO a human and an eel have a COMPLETELY different bone structure. Humans and chimps have all the same bones, which are slightly modified.
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
@quizmasterdave said "If we evolved from primates why haven't we eradicated illnesses"
-Well just like we evolve, germs, bacteria, and viruses evolve too. Some viruses are actually QUITE good at evolving. For instance HIV, which is sooo good at evolving that it is constantly becoming immune to our drugs, which is one of the main reasons it is so difficult.
"Surely we should have less not 100's times more?"
-You're gonna have to clarify this question. 100 times more what?
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
Athiests, Ignore these idiots. All these christians are is a bunch of butthurt faggots
iRobii 3 months ago
Oh things look designed therefore they are. Er need a little bit more proof than that for some invisible undetectable creator. All things proposed as irreducibly complex have so far been explained through evolution. Pretty week and in no way proves evolution wrong. Try again.
mtbee9 3 months ago
Christ is LORD!!!!!!
the146truth 3 months ago
And 100 years from now, we're going to discover machines within the machines, and so on and so forth... God is good!
ChristusVlCTOR 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a LIST of scientists (with videos on Youtube) that say evolution is BULLSHIT and Intelligent Design is the more LOGICAL explanation for all life. Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Paul Nelson, Dr. John Sanford, Dr. Michael Behe, Dr. David Berlinski, Dr. John Morris, Dr. Rick Oliver, Dr. Ian Macreadie, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Jonathan Safarti, Dr. Ann Gauger, and Dr. Stephen Meyer
MOST of those scientists ^ have PHD degrees in the field of Biology (unlike Darwin who had NO DEGREE IN BIOLOGY)__FACT
evoTARDSareINSANE 4 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Evo-CLOWNS want us to "believe" that single celled organisms (which magically arose from NON LIFE in a fantasy process called abiogenesis) then miraculously transitioned into plant life, then insect life, followed by aquatic plant life and aquatic animal life, then land mammalian life, and finally us bipedal Homo Sapiens (which are still Homo Sapiens after 200,000 years of supposed evolution).
Wow, and I thought the tooth fairy and Santa Claus sounded like BULLSHIT.
evoTARDSareINSANE 4 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
Further DISPROVING evolution is the sexual reproduction problem. If a truly new species arose from a pre-existing species then that DNA-defying mutation which caused such a macroevolutionary transformation would also have to occur in a member of the opposite sex in order for that newly evolved species to produce more of its kind.
evoTARDSareINSANE 4 months ago 11
@evoTARDSareINSANE LOL who told you that? or did you come up with that all by yourself.. for it is quite wrong.
dmfarias07 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Disproving evolution....
The Cambrian Explosion, Living Fossils, the inability of mutations to add large amounts of new information to the genome, Irreducible Complexity of individual organs, the LACK of intermediate fossils bridging the gaps between separate family classifications, Specified Complexity, the FAILURE of all experiments attempting to cause single-celled organisms to become multicellular, the Origin of Bats, and the FAILURE of all experiments attempting to cause abiogenesis
evoTARDSareINSANE 4 months ago 7
why cant we keep our opinions of how life started to ourselves and live peacefully?
knuckleheadh2o 6 months ago
@knuckleheadh2o the issue is how life ends.. & then what? Athiests might view death as switching off a light bulb, in which case, who cares about death, life is meaningless. But Christians care for the lives of others because we understand that this is not all there is. Life goes on, Eternal Life, or Eternal Punishment. God is not willing that any should perish, but apart from Him there can be no life, for God is Life. Those who reject Jesus are cast into the Lake of Fire, which is the 2nd Death
ChristusVlCTOR 4 months ago
@ChristusVlCTOR yeah, I am a Christian, It is just that I wish that this ongoing war between evolution and creationism would stop. If you don't like creationism just ignore it instead of attacking it. or vice versa. And always remember science can be proven wrong like in the past
knuckleheadh2o 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LethalSub = TROLL
a troll that has gotten OWNED by me for YEARS now
ZERO evidence of evolution.
its total pseudo-intellectual FALLACY
buffboynick 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr Rhawn Joseph PHD -> h t t p://JournalofCosmology(dot)com /Cosmology1.html
Dr Richard Hoover -> h t t p://journalofcosmology(dot)com /Life100.html
Both ^ are ARTICLES submitted for PEER REVIEW__FACT
Looks like ev-LIE-ution takes another HIT. Darwinists = CLOWNS
buffboynick 8 months ago
there are still people who think evolution is wrong? l o l
do you guys know about the strong evidence for evolution???
to believe that the earth is only 6000 years old and the first living being was the humans makes soooooo much more sense!
seriously: wtf?????
GoldenCrusader93 8 months ago
@GoldenCrusader93 no not all evolution. Most believers in creation dispute the notion that ONE kind of creature can "become" a completely different creature over time. Evolution within a specie is not disputed. Irreducible complexity is one of many proofs of creation.
Moralityman 1 month ago
@Moralityman said "Evolution within a specie is not disputed."
-Good so you should have no problem with the FACT humans are part of the great ape species.
"Irreducible complexity is one of many proofs of creation."
-No it's not. The first simple cell could have road in on an asteroid then evolved. All this proves is that modern cells are more complex than ancient cells. Just because modern cells are complex does NOT mean the first ancient cells were too.
Pooverse 4 weeks ago
alan....copy and paste the link below to your browser (remove the "dot" and spaces) and then read that article from that journal......
journalofcosmology (dot) com/Commentary203.html
^^ The link above deals with INCREASING complexity of all life here on Earth which has dramatically increased since the primitive life forms of the pre-historic era.
ALL scientists (including Darwinists) agree 100% that the complexity has increased exponentially.
Extraterrestrial origin is the most plausible.
buffboynick 9 months ago
The following is from a scientific journal.....
"Algae will grow in temperatures from approx 5 to 40 degress Celsius (approx 40 to 100 Fahrenheit)"
Pretty obvious those red cells ARE NOT algae!!!
Rather odd the Indian government study chose to IGNORE this FACT!!
Maybe that's why Louis and Kumar have never been challenged nor disproven by any other scientists in their community
Panspermia is an example of "life-seeding"
What are the odds of such bizarre life just "accidentally" being there?
buffboynick 9 months ago
Take another look for your "evidence for evolution"
Evolutionists actually show evidence for AAT every time they open their mouth lol. Quite ironic
I cant wait till the scientists in the UK that are making animal-human hybrids start analyzing the DNA of their newly created species.
It will look identical to the "evidence" evolutionists say shows "shared ancestry" lol.
Genetic engineering = how species came to be and why the COMPLEXITY of organisms is INCREASING!!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
Darwinists love to "cherry pick" science
I guess thats why they ignore the DNA evidence and fossil record which CLEARLY shows genetic manipulation took place.
Factor in LAB PROVEN extraterrestrial implants and the lab findings on surgical mutilations in areas of high UFO activity and its obvious this biosphere (Earth) is a science project for beings from elsewhere.
No evolution and no creationism. Fallacies
The "soul" may come from God, but physical life forms obviously come from engineering
buffboynick 9 months ago
Both Louis and Kumar have published numerous papers on the Red Rain of Kerala in 2006, 2008, and 2010 showing documented evidence the cells inside that rain are not normal, terrestrial cells in any shape or form
The only main challenger of their claims is the Government of India (quite ironic) that have ZERO evidence or convincing data to support THEIR hypothesis.
Its a classic case of "scientists" disagreeing with each other. But its obvious Louis and Kumar have more DATA on THEIR side!!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick "The only main challenger of their claims is the Government of India (quite ironic) that have ZERO evidence or convincing data to support THEIR hypothesis." Untrue. The scientists at the Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute grew the spores in a culture and got them to germinate, dyed them and examined their genetic material.
Louis/Kumar tried to dye the spores without growing them, the cell membranes remained intact, not accepting dye. So they saw no genetic material
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
Did you even bother to read the 3 separate articles they wrote in the scientific journals???
There is more data to show support for them then the one LONE dissenter (The Indian Government)
Also.....what is the point of attacking them? FAR BETTER data supporting both panspermia and ancient astronaut theory has come out since then.
Such as NASA biologist Richard Hoover's find!! Which was peer reviewed!!. Do you have a point?
buffboynick 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
The Government of India COMMISSIONED 2 separate groups to investigate and one was the TBGR so I was 100% right. They did the study on behalf of the Indian government. "The CESS report noted that they could find no satisfactory explanation for the apparently extraordinary dispersal, nor for the apparent uptake of the spores into clouds. CESS scientists noted that "While the cause of the color in the rainfall has been identified, finding the answers to these questions is a challenge"
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick "...ne was the TBGR so I was 100% right." only if you misread my statement. You claimed that "...they have ZERO evidence..." THAT is the statement to which I was referring when I said "Untrue," NOT that the government of India had TBRG perform the research. Again, they DID have evidence, so your statement that they had ZERO evidence was untrue.
Google Skeptoid 4224 Red Rain has fallen several times since 2001 and the botanists have found the same Trentepohlia spores every time.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA "these cells can undergo rapid replication even at the extreme high temperature of 300 degrees celsius"
Show us all any DATA whatsoever that shows "algae spores" can do this!!!
These men published 3 papers in scientific journals which have yet to be disproven.
Spores (nor nothing terrestrial has been shown to replicate at such extreme temperatures!!!
Its obvious Louis and Kumar have more DATA on THEIR side!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick Oh, a couple of more things.
1) Even if it is true that CESS "..could find no satisfactory explanation..." it means they could find "no satisfactory explanation", not "hey, it is Pansperia!" Look up the argument from ignorance.
2) I am NOT arguing that Panspermia does not exist if you define Panspermia to me precursors of life of biologically active material coming to earth on meteors. That is NOT the same as saying Ancient Astronauts caused it and it says NOTHING about the TOE.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
The "argument from ignorance" applies more to the finding of the Indian Government....
Since they LACK any explanation for the documented evidence that Louis and Kumar discovered about the cells through vigorous lab analysis.
They explained it perfectly. Terrestrial life has limitations that some extraterrestrial life apparently does not have.
The only thing that could disprove this would be finding terrestrial life that can replicate under those temperature extremes. LOGIC
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick The TBGR grew the spores in medium, stained them, and then examined their genetic material. The statement "The microorganism isolated from the red rain of Kerala shows very extraordinary characteristics, like the ability to grow optimally at 300°C (572°F) and the capacity to metabolize a wide range of organic and inorganic materials" in Wikipedia is immediately followed by "These claims and data have yet to be verified and reported in any peer reviewed publication"
AlanCFA 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "The only thing that could disprove this would be finding terrestrial life that can replicate under those temperature extremes" Once again, you ignore the FACT that even if this was of extra-terrestrial origin, and even if there was evidence that this type of event was the origin of life on earth, neither piece of information would show the theory of evolution to be wrong. The TOE explains the diversity, not the origin of life. Also, Panspermia would not be evidence of AA theory.
AlanCFA 9 months ago 6
@AlanCFA
Look at the "evidence for evolution"
Everything you need to know is right there for you....
DNA similarities in all living things (except for the part of our Homo Sapien DNA that remains "unexplained") and the lack of shared ancestor fossils showing SOURCE of origin
Evolutionists cant even agree on the "shared ancestor" of birds (type in Origin of birds in Wikipedia)
Our "shared ancestor" (technically known as the CHLCA, which is also on Wikipedia) doesnt exist. We come from a LAB
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "We come from a LAB" There is no evidence for that, but since you like playing word games, where did the beings working in the lab come from? If we came from a lab, was it in our current form? If so, then how did Panspermia play any role? Why does Red Rain mean anything? If not, then did we evolve once we got here?
I do not wish to promote a false dichotomy by claiming that you are either a troll or an idiot since, it appears, you are both.l
AlanCFA 9 months ago 3
@AlanCFA
I didnt know that pointing out the FACT that no shared ancestor exists, has been found, nor ever will be found is a "word game"
Its the facts. Also if the CHLCA did exist.....its fossils would be EASIER to find then its supposed sub-species (like neanderthal fossils which are NUMEROUS)
The lack of any shared ancestor and LACK of the billions to trillions of transitional features showing one fossil becoming another shows obvious gene hybridization/modification in a LAB.
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "Its the facts. Also if the CHLCA did exist.....its fossils would be EASIER to find then its supposed sub-species (like neanderthal fossils which are NUMEROUS)"
Can you explain why this is so?
lethalsub 6 months ago
@AlanCFA
as for the 1st extraterrestrial life form to exist in this universe (the 3rd dimension).....
It was said that the 1st race of extraterrestrial came from another dimension (which means it was actually not an extraterrestrial but an inter-dimensional being)
and it didnt show up as a "single-celled organism" either. It was supposedly fully-formed just like all new species that mysteriously emerge in the fossil record.
No evolution, just a genetic engineering "domino effect". LOGIC
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick Who does this genetic engineering?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@AlanCFA
Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering.
Geneticists use Chromosome Fusion all the time in order to genetically engineer plants, vegetables, food, etc. Its one of the main techniques used in the process of genetic modification.
And if you have 45 minutes I suggest watch the video below that shows evidence it was done to genetically engineer Homo Sapiens.....
/watch?v=eb3BsHBchY4
DisprovingEvolution 1 week ago 2
@DisprovingEvolution said "Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering."
-NO it doesn't. Fusion is a common occurrence in all NATURAL evolution as-well. If chromosome fusion was something we ONLY observed in genetic engineering you might have a point but it isn't so you don't.
Pooverse 1 week ago
@Pooverse
Actually NO, you're quite wrong.
Chromosome 2 is not just any typical Chromosome. Its affects brain development. Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development.
Had you bothered to research this topic (instead of spewing fallacies like the typical evolutionist) you'd know that geneticists use chromosome fusion in genetic engineering to make hybrids foods/plants and now in the UK animal-human hybrids for research. PWNED!
evoTARDSareINSANE 1 week ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@evoTARDSareINSANE said "Its affects brain development."
-So what.
"Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development."
-REALLY? I would loved to see your evidence for this claim.
Pooverse 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pooverse Your comment was falsely flagged as spam, so I am reposting it.
@evoTARDSareINSANE said "Its affects brain development."
-So what.
"Its also fused in a way that is not only NOT common in other organisms but unique to human development."
-REALLY? I would loved to see your evidence for this claim.
AlanCFA 22 hours ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@evoTARDSareINSANE
-I don't think I'm going to have a mature logical debate with someone that ends a post in "PWNED"
-Your mentality might be better suited arguing with 13 year old boys on xbox.
Pooverse 1 week ago
@evoTARDSareINSANE "Chromosome 2 is not just any typical Chromosome."
Oh, a fusion of one of the other, unimportant, chromosomes would not suggest genetic engineering, but only that of the atypical Chromosome 2? Did you sniff petrochemicals for fun at one time or is your defective brain due to some genetic engineering experiment?
AlanCFA 22 hours ago
@DisprovingEvolution "Actually Chromosome 2 Fusion points towards Genetic Engineering."
Actually, it does not. The TOE posits that humans and other apes share a common ancestor. When it was discovered that humans have 46 chromosomes and the other apes have 48, there were two possibilities: 1) the TOE was wrong or 2) that we had a fused chromosome. This was a test of the TOE that could not be performed for years and yet the results, once again, supported evolution.
AlanCFA 22 hours ago
FAIL
No sir.....viruses dont show 'common ancestry" as members of your RELIGION so moronically put it.
What would show "shared ancestry" is the fucking shared ancestor!!!! You dumb evolutionist. No CHLCA for you.
Funny we can find fossils 3.5 BILLION years old, 250 million year old dinosaur fossils, and numerous neanderthal fossils yet ZERO CHLCA fossils.
Understand this religious believer? Have fun worshipping your ape-man god lol
gregclarkey 9 months ago
Evolution = another DUMB religion of NONSENSE
buffboynick 10 months ago
@buffboynick
evolution a religion?..are u fucking insane?..it's a branch of science. expert scientists study and dedicate their lives to understanding evolution. u are fucking clueless.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Seriously, I mean truly research all aspects of Darwinian theory. Even read "Origin of Species" by Darwin (especially the parts where shows the NUMEROUS flaws in the theory)
Many scientists like Dr David Berlinksi and Dr John Morris have exposed the fallacy that is the theory of evolution (thoroughly disproving it)
There any many videos even better then this one ^^^ that expose the house of cards that evolution truly is. Upon examination....its indeed a DUMB religion
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
flaws in the origin of species?!..the book was written in the 1800s!!...the theory of evolution has profoundly progressed since then..it has done nothing but gain steam in the scientific community. only a fringe handful of religiously motivated people speak out against evolution. and they do so out of ignorance.
all dr. berlinski has done is display his ignorance of evolution. ignorance is not evidence against something.. if u wanna learn about evolution, learn from scientists!
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
the scientific theory that not only disproves evolution (and has actual FACTS to support it, unlike evolution) is called "ancient astronaut theory"
Its now possible for us humans to create animal-human hybrids__FACT. They are currently doing this in the UK but it was made illegal by the USA congress a few years ago
We (us Homo Sapiens) are the result of an alien lab experiment. And truth be told.....its not even that hard to create life and do gene splicing because we can do it
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
u know things. but, u obtain your knowledge from terrible sources. there's no evidence to support evolution?..what fuckin planet do u live on?..99.8% of earth and life scientists on this globe accept evolution..the theory of evolution explains and ties together all that we find about life. evolutionary theory is actually applied to fighting disease and upgrading pesticides. why is this applied?..because insects and bacteria EVOLVE.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@buffboynick
u simply do not understand evolution..u started off not understanding it, and instead of learning about evolution from science textbooks and lectures, u educated yourself via youtube videos. youtube videos featuring religiously motivated fringe figures..people who aren't expert earth and life scientists don't properly understand evolution..then, they spread their own ignorance and misconceptions around to the public, and u listen to them like they know what they are talking about.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Dr David Berlinski and Dr. John Morris are 2 REAL SCIENTISTS (unlike you) that DISPROVED evolution a LONG time ago__FACT
Even Wikipedia disproves evolution.....go to Wikipedia and type in "CHLCA"
Go read all about your MYTHICAL monkey-man god. If evolution was renamed "magical mutation theory" (which is exactly what it is) then I guaranteer you wouldnt "believe" in it.
You belong to a RELIGION. The Religion of Neo-Darwinism. Get educated kid.
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
"David Berlinski (born 1942) is an American educator and author of several books on mathematics. Berlinski is a Senior Fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, a religious "think-tank" that is hub of the intelligent design movement."
he sure has the credentials to challenge the vast majority of earth and life scientists..he has no formal education in the earth and life sciences, yet, u listen to him and not the experts..get your head out of your ass.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
WRONG
Nice how you avoided the part of Wikipedia that states he is a MOLECULAR BIOLOGIST.
He has degrees in philosophy, mathematics, and molecular biology__FACT
Nice try monkey-man believer. You FAIL again, just like your magical mutation theory
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
i didn't purposely leave it out..i just didn't read far enough down..but, he's still biased..he starts out with this firm belief that life needs an intelligent designer. so, he cherry picks everything to support that..but, evolution can explain how complexity can emerge without an intelligence..and how life can drastically change over many years.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
Do me a favor....
Goto to the search box at the top and type in "Animal Human Hybrids"
Watch the BBC News video about how we (us humans) can NOW manipulate DNA and create animal-human hybrids__FACT
A few years ago the USA banned making animal-human hybrids__FACT. Its perfectly legal in the UK though.
If us dumb humans can make NEW species then it would be a cakewalk for an advance civilization__FACT
No magical mutations, no CHLCA. Its a MYTH.
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
u don't understand evolution, so u deem it as far fetched..the same way ancient people who deem flying airplanes as far fetched since they don't understand the science of flight..what exactly is magical about mutations?..dna replicates itself..many times, there are copying errors (mutations)..most are neutral, many are damaging, and then there's the rare beneficial mutation..the beneficial mutations are kept, and passed on to the next generations.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
I understand the inept and FLAWED theory of evolution BETTER then you do!!!
They say we (Homo Sapiens) diverged in lineage from an ancestor that we shared with chimpanzees and neanderthals__FACT
Thats the theory ^^^
There is ZERO proof of this RELIGION. Understand?
Whats there is proof of is genetic tampering with life forms by and advanced race (or races). There's no "conspiracy" its all in the DNA evidence and fossil record
Truth isnt a "conspiracy" its simple TRUTH
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
and listen to yourself.."try looking at the REAL scientific data"..what, the opinions of fringe figures?..if these people have proved evolution wrong, why aren't they winning awards?..why aren't they publishing papers in peer reviewed journals?..why aren't they getting attention from expert evolutionary biologists?..why is it that 99.8% of scientists on the earth accept evolution?..why do u listen to the fringe figures about evolution, and not the evolutionary biologists?
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
Llyod Pye
research Llyod Pye's scientific work.
He is a GREAT example of great science. Research the data on "red rain" by the scientists in the BBC documentary "We Are the Aliens"
You evolutionists are experts at "cherry picking" and deceiving the public. Luckily men like me have exposed your RELIGION and propaganda for the biased NONSENSE it truly is.
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick Yet I exposed you. You don't even cherry pick, you just lie, and I have proof.
It's written all over youtube, _FACT.
lethalsub 8 months ago
lemme guess why..because u believe that the 99.8% of experts that support evolution are part of a wolrd wide conspiracy to falsely perpetuate evolution as true?
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Not only is Berlinkski a molecular biologist, philosopher, and mathematician.....but also AGNOSTIC.
He isnt even liked by Creationists (because he isnt one)
Berlinksi refuses to give an alternative theory to evolution, he simply points out the NUMEROUS flaws with the FAILED theory.
Nice try Darwinist. You ev-LIE-utionists LIE even more then creationists lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
stop acting like a 12 year old..i didn't lie. i just didn't read enough into his bio, which i've already told u.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
yeah....its rather convenient how you monkey-man believers cherry pick the supposed 'evidence" that makes your side look right.
I dont believe in monkey gods or cross gods.....
I believe in the TRUTH. And I know it mathematically IMPOSSIBLE that humans are alone in a universe that is INFINITE in size.
Its also MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for species-transforming mutations to occur without leaving NUMEROUS fossils__FACT
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
we don't cherry pick evidence..science just doesn't work like that..the theory of evolution, like all scientific theories, gather ALL of the available facts, and see where ALL of the evidence points..it accounts for all of the evidence..it explains all of the evidence..science works like a true investigation..it doesn't start with a conclusion..it lets the evidence build the conclusion..
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
Oh yes....please explain to us all how "science" works lol.
You probably didnt even know the technical name of the "shared ancestor" (CHLCA) before I brought it up!!!
BOTH THE DNA EVIDENCE AND FOSSIL RECORD SHOW GENETIC ENGINEERING
No shared ancestors, no source of origin, no observable RADICAL "species-transforming" mutations.
U getting this kid?
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
radical species transforming mutations? lol..of course not. evolution doesn't work like that u fool..it works very very gradually..mutations are usually always very small changes to the genome..after a LONG time, these small changes lead to large change..u DON'T understand how evolution works.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
No once again.....both the fossil record and DNA evidence show that 'small mutations" (as you evolutionists call it, when in reality its just unstable cells) CANNOT produce the radical difference in species!!!! Not even over the course of BILLIONS of years!!!
Homo Sapiens 1st appeared at least 200,000 years ago, co-existed with Neanderthals, and still exist today and have NOT "magically mutated" into a NEW species__FACT. That is hundreds of THOUSANDS OF YEARS!!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
we share thousands of ERV's with chimps..ERV's couldn't have randomly infected human and chimp chromosomes in the same exact locations thousands of different times..humans and chimps must have inherited these ERV's from a common ancestor from which we both branched..
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Great....the find the "common ancestor" you religious believer lol.
There are no "random, accidental, chance mutations" that can TRANSFORM one species into a NEW one__FACT.
ONLY genetic manipulation can do that. They used genetic splicing, genetic hybridization, and gene removal to make us!!!!
Alien DNA was mixed with terrestrial ape DNA and then gradually modified and corrected (65 times to be exact) and they removed 12 strands of DNA from the original human genome
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
evolution is NOT random chance!..the mutations that occur during dna transcription are random, but natural selection, which determines which mutations are beneficial, and which ones are not, is anything but random..hence, natural SELECTION..mutations that aid in survival, are selected for by nature, and traits that do not aid survival, are weeded out thru death.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
And as I have said before (which you ignored)
There are NUMEROUS scientists that support both intelligent design and ancient astronaut theory
Many are featured in the documentary "Expelled" (which is also on Youtube)
Even known evolutionist Richard Dawkins admits that alien genetic engineering is a definite possibility and the video of him saying that is here on YouTube___FACT
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
natural selection is essentially a weeding out process..this weeding out process has been CONSTANTLY functioning for around 3.5 BILLION years..it has basically unintelligently and unconsciously "designed" life to be suited to the environment..it's all pretty simple..there's nothing magical about it..
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
1. The oldest known fossil is 3.5 Billion years old__FACT
2. We have found NUMEROUS dinosaur fossils that are 250 MILLION years old__FACT
3. If the CHLCA existed (which it doesnt since MYTHS dont exist) then its fossils would be around 7-10 million years old and would be EASIER to find then the PREVIOUS 2 examples___FACT
Are you done yet? Or should I go into plant evolution (disproven), insect evolution (disproven), and how time doesnt DRASTICALLY alter DNA?
Evolution = BS
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
dr. morris is a religious creationist..he's a geologist. he doesn't have a formal education in evolutionary biology. he is the president of the institute for creation research..open your damn eyes..these people have a religious agenda..evolution happens to go against their preconceived religious views, so, they challenge it..does it not matter to u that 99.8% of earth and life scientists around the globe greatly support evolution?..does that just go in one ear and out the other?
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Morris is a creationist true. Berlinski however is not (he is Agnostic)
and how does Morris being a creationist matter at all????
What he personally believes in has no bearing whatsoever on the data, evidence, and proof he has consistently shown that DISPROVES evolution.
Its you ev-LIE-utionits that stage HOAXES (like Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man)
If there is so much evidnece for evolution then why do you Darwinists make FAKE FOSSILS like Piltdown Man???
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
are u fucking kidding me?..you're gonna bring up piltdown man and nebraska man like they were conspiracies by evolutionary scientists to perpetuate evolution as true?..the hoaxes were obviously attempts at fame and publicity, not attempts to perpetuate evolution as being true..and how do those 2 hoaxes invalidate the great amount of real hominid fossils?
itzahazylife 9 months ago 2
@itzahazylife
Piltdown Man was the most deceptive, diabolical, and evil distortion of science to ever be perpetrated on the scientific community.
Also.....how do hominids prove evolution?
Finding the source of origin of a species is all that matters!!!! and guess what...no "shared ancestors" exist.
Homo Sapiens DID NOT come from chimps, neanderthals, nor any hominid.
They say we "diverged in lineage from the CHLCA" so then.....where the fuck are the fossils????
Hiding with unicorns? lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
and who the hell is talking about other life in the universe?..why does the existence of aliens have anything to do with evolution being true or not? and no one says we come from chimps..evolution is based on common ancestry..humans, chimps, gorillas, orangutans, and bonobos all branched off from a single ancestral species.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Typical straw man arguments, logical fallacies, and 'religious" nonsense from Darwinism
If you're not a PRIME example of evolution being a RELIGION then I dont know what is.
You believe in a FAIRYTALE. Try actually looking at the REAL scientific data
Take a NON-biased approach to explaining the fossil record and DNA evidence. Its OBVIOUS that genetic tampering took place
Its also funny that we have existed for 200,000 years at least and still havent MORPHED into a new species
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
there's no reasoning with u..this debate is not an example of me defending my "religious" beliefs. it's me defending genuine scientific understanding..it would be the same thing if a bunch of fringe nutjobs started doubting the theory of gravity..and started creating agendas to misinform the public about gravity.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
Comment removed
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
are u fucking kidding me?!..we directly observe bacteria genetically changing. scientists have to upgrade vaccines and cures because diseases are always evolving..farmers have to upgrade pesticides because insects are always evolving..life changes! that's the fact!..the theory of evolution explains HOW life changes..life changes very very gradually. but, many small changes over a very long period of time, equates to large scale change, hence, NEW SPECIES.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Apparently you dont know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution.
Small "MINOR" changes in cells due to reproduction, interactions with viruses/bacteria, and cell breakdown due to aging is NOT "evolution" but examples of cell interactions
The type of Radical macroevolution you Darwinists theorize is not only UNPROVEN but also FANTASY.
Its pure SPECULATION and NOT science!!!
There is ZERO proof of macroevolution and in fact....its ILLOGICAL. Pure nonsense
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
absolute nonsense..gravity comes from the distortion of space. mass distorts the space around it..less massive objects are then drawn to more massive objects via this distortion..this distortion was proven when scientists discovered that u could see the light from a star even though it was directly behind a planet...this is because the beam of light followed the curvature of space created by the mass of the planet..it's called gravitational lensing.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
WRONG
Apparently your LACK of scientific understanding extends beyond the PSEUDOSCIENCE of evolution.
I suggest you type in "gravitational radiation" in on Google quick before you EMBARRASS yourself further.
The particles that are inside gravitational radiation that produce gravity are called "gravitons"__FACT
buffboynick 9 months ago
u tell me to learn from real scientists..i educate myself via the information that's published by peer reviewed science..the information that's in scientific journals..where do u learn science?..from youtube videos by fringe figures who don't properly understand that which they argue against?
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
"Peer reviewed"
Piltdown Man was "peer reviewed" until a NON memeber of the Darwin RELIGION took a closer look.
Also.....the majority of "peer reviewed" science shows more EVIDENCE for genetic engineering then evolution (both the DNA and the fossil record show that)
Apparently you're so devoted to your ape-man MYTH that you fail to understand REAL science
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick "This is why all planets in our solar system revolve around the sun and NOT Jupiter (which is much closer to us and VERY large)"
Last time you said this, you removed it then said it was a typing error, I find it very unlikely that you could make that kind of retarded mistake twice. This is very good proof you are severely misinformed, and retarded.
lethalsub 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick
endogenous retro viruses effectively prove common ancestry..ERV's are viruses that infect chromosomes. they become dormant, and end up being passed on to the next generations..if your father has an ERV somewhere along his chromosome, u will inherit that chromosome, and the ERV will be in the same exact location on your chromosome and your offsprings, and so on and so on. (cont)
itzahazylife 9 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
Do viruses cause "species-transforming" mutations? the answer.....NO
Do viruses explain the GAPS in the fossil record? the answer......NO
Do viruses explain why neanderthals share 99.5% DNA with us yet we DID NOT come from them? the answer......NO
Another FAIL for the religion of Darwinism lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick
and what are u talking about??
"Do viruses cause "species-transforming" mutations? the answer.....NO"
why the hell WOULD a virus explain such a thing?..endogenous retro viruses display our common ancestry with the other great apes..that's all.
"gaps in the fossil record"...OF COURSE there are gaps in the fossil record. the process of fossilization is very rare..no scientist expects to find all these fossils.
itzahazylife 9 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
FAIL
No sir.....viruses dont show 'common ancestry" as members of your RELIGION so moronically put it.
What would show "shared ancestry" is the fucking shared ancestor!!!! You dumb evolutionist. No CHLCA for you.
Funny we can find fossils 3.5 BILLION years old, 250 million year old dinosaur fossils, and numerous neanderthal fossils yet ZERO CHLCA fossils.
Understand this religious believer? Have fun worshipping your ape-man god lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife You are really not very intelligent. The ERV's are virus that attack the germ level of humans. The only cause of mutations on the germ level is from radiation or from virus, bacteria, ,or fungus attacking the egg, sperm or the fetus. Why don't you know this?
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou
it's irrelevant how mutations are caused on the germ level..the fact is, like u said, ERV's attack germ cells. theses ERV's can infect chromosomes, become dormant, and are passed onto subsequent generations..every inheritor of the original possessor, will have the ERV/ERV's in the exact same location along their chromosomes. interestingly enough, chimps and humans share thousands of ERV's, and each ERV is in the exact same locations along both chimp and human chromosomes.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife There is nothing "irrelevant"about germ level mutations. Those are the permanent ones that destroy a species. Germ level ERV's are not a good thing. Every one represents a genetic degradation.
Chimps are a very young species, much younger than humans by either 1.5 million years or 500 thousand years even according to the totally screwed up radiometric dating and there is only one set of fossilized teeth of chimps. We came from the same superior human lineage.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou "We came from the same superior human lineage." That is your hypothesis this week. You keep changing them, not because of new discoveries, but because people show that you do not know what you are talking about. You are a liar and an idiot.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou
either chimps and humans share a common ancestor from which we both branched, and inherited these ERV's from that common ancestor, or thousands of ERV's happened to randomly infect thousands of the exact same portions of both chimp and human chromosomes. what makes more sense?..come on, you're a smart guy. a basement scientist to be exact. btw, in all seriousness, your music is pretty good..
itzahazylife 9 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife The chimp and human connection with DNA evidence only showing genetic degradation makes the chimps some really de-evolved human creatures. We both came from the same superior human ancestors. Go look at the evidence. DNA is absolutely irrefutable evidence of ONLY genetic loss.
Chimps show a total loss of many of their human genes, particularly easy to see in the brain region. HAR-1 has 18 or so mutations of loss.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou "The chimp and human connection with DNA evidence only showing genetic degradation makes the chimps some really de-evolved human creatures." This statement from the IDIOT who claimed that humans mated with gorillas to produce the chimp and claimed that the fusion of human chromosome #2 NEVER happened only to reverse himself. A lying, delusional fool who pretends that he has read 20,000+ peer-reviewed papers on the TOE but does not understand the fundamentals.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@buffboynick
and why does it matter that morris is a creationist?..c'mon, think about it..if u have a prior supernatural belief about how life originated and diversified, u will cherry pick things to support that preconceived belief..these people go into learning about evolution after they already believe in creationism..it creates a very biased form of investigation..it causes one to pick and chose evidence.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@buffboynick "If there is so much evidnece for evolution then why do you Darwinists make FAKE FOSSILS like Piltdown Man???"
I didn't have to fake fossils, it's just that I was bored and decided, one evening, to make Piltdown Man. It was easy to fool the scientists; it was the creationist John Morris that led to my downfall. I should have known that I could not fool a real scientist like him. His father proved that the TOE was invented by Satan and Nimrod while standing on the Tower of Babel.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
Then what was your motivation for "Nebraska Man"?
hahahaha!!!!
Alien gods beat ape-man gods :)
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick "Then what was your motivation for "Nebraska Man"?"
Well, you know the old saying, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. I thought that I could make an entire family of cavemen from the tooth of an extinct pig. The fact that the only person who bought into it was an artist drawing for The Illustrated London News was disheartening. I convinced the entire scientific community about Piltdown Man, but absolutely no scientists fell for my Nebraska Man hoax. Go figure.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
Comment removed
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA
all hail the mighty "ape-man" and the magical mutations that produced him lol (oh wait....he was never found)
The CHLCA may be hiding out at the North Pole with Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.....riding on a flaming blue unicorn
buffboynick 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
"99.8% support evolution"
Where did you pull that statistic from? your ass?? lol
In the Documentary "Expelled No Intelligence Allowed" they show NUMEROUS scientists that expose evolution for the FAILURE that it is.
Many in the scientific community know evolution is a bullshit religion and many of them arent even creationists__FACT
You evolutionists are as delusional as creationists lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
and u keep calling evolution a religion..are u nuts?..is plate tectonic theory a religion?..is germ theory a religion?..is the theory of gravity a religion?..is quantum theory a religion?..the theory of evolution, like all theories, have been constructed via scientific investigation. now for the last time, evolution is a branch of science!..when u learn about evolution, u learn it via text books, not holy books!..u learn it from biologists, not preachers!
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
I am saying that it has "become" a religion.
When Darwin first came up with the theory it was a semi-decent and semi-credible scientific theory on his part. Back then.....it made sense.
Now (in 2011) its becoming a religion. Its like believing in 'Flat-Earth' or the "sun revolving around the Earth"
With all the DNA evidence and fossil evidence......BETTER and more credible theories have replaced it (ancient astronaut theory/panspermia).
Evolution is now a religion I'm afraid.
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
it has not become a religion..sure, there's an evolution movement, but, that's only because of religiously motivated people who spread around misinformation and ignorance regarding evolution..a movement was necessary from scientists and citizens to make sure these people didn't distort the science to support their religious agenda. evolution is contradictory to biblical literalism. there's a powerful motivation for the religious to distort the truth science brings fourth.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
Kid you have no idea what you're talking about.
Evolution is contradictory towards LOGIC__FACT
Has nothing to do with creationism (which I also know is crap by the way)
1. NO CHLCA has been found__FACT
2. If the CHLCA actually existed its fossils would be EASIER to find then 250 million year old DINOSAUR FOSSILS (which we have tons of)
3. Neanderthals share 99.5% DNA with us (yet science proved we did NOT come from them)
This ^^^ is the evidence for AAT. U = MORON
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
"BETTER and more credible theories have replaced it (ancient astronaut theory/panspermia)"
lol, panspermia replaces evolution? that doesn't make sense..panspermia explains how life came to be on earth..it states that life was seeded here..but, it doesn't account for the great amount of diversity of life on earth..that's where the theory of evolution comes in..life changes. we know this for a fact. give it billions of years, and it'll change a lot, and gradually gain complexity.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
@itzahazylife
No thats not where magical mutation theory (evolution) comes in....
In fact....both the DNA evidence and the fossil record DISPROVE evolution__FACT.
This info is EASY to find if you examine the theory of evolution closely.
No traceable shared ancestors, no 'real" transitional fossils (which would show billions to trillions of gradual changes as one species becomes a NEW one), no CHLCA, no observable data of "species-transforming" mutations, and NO EMPIRICAL DATA
its a MYTH
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick
like i said, u obtain your information from conspiracy theorists, and not scientists..no real transitional fossils?..who says this?..because scientists sure as hell don't say this..there are literally thousands of examples of transitions..there are even living examples..for example the walking catfish..it has both in water and out of water breathing mechanisms, and has primitive type feet.
itzahazylife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@itzahazylife
stick to examples of "human speciation" and not more primitive life forms.....
Lets start at the TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN and work down....
Give 1 example of human speciation!!!!
NONE EXISTS
They still cant find the SOURCE of Homo Sapien origin__FACT
They cant find it in the fossil record because we were designed in a LAB!!!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick "...has actual FACTS to support it, unlike evolution) is called "ancient astronaut theory""
Yes, actual facts. Those 22,000-year-old coconut chewies discovered in Libya are proof of that!
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
Actually CLOWN....
The Red Rain that fell in India (proving Panspermia) which was featured in the BBC Documentary "We Are the Aliens" is "proof". Which was "peer reviewed" by the way.
Now....how bout you do us all a favor and go look for the CHLCA.....
Go on little pseudo-scientist and look for your MYTHICAL "ape-man" god.
There only thing that has more GAPING HOLES then evolution is your mom :)
You FAIL at life, never have kids "monkey-man believer'
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick WOW! "Red Rain" in India proves Panspermia! So ancient astronauts dumped Trentepohlia lichen on earth. Who woulda thunk it?
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
You apparently didnt watch the video or read the journals on it.
It was the microscopic particles inside the rain that was proven extraterrestrial and was never before seen by any scientist before__FACT
These extraterrestrial organisms were also found inside a recent meteorite which was also "peer reviewed"
Wake up "ape-man believer"
Ape-men dont surgically mutilate cattle nor implant nano-tech in human bodies!!!
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick Godfrey Louis hypothesized that the red rain was caused by spores from a meteor, but that was only a hypothesis with little supporting evidence. Try using Google and you can find multiple stories with the correct analysis. Indian government's Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute examined a sample of the Red Rain and found it contained spores from a common, local algae called Trentepohlia.
Your ancient astronaut hypothesis is garbage.
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
Actually NO, you FAIL like all ev-LIE-utionists
The mysterious red rain fell for two months in 2001. According to local scientist Godfrey Louis, the rain contains biological cells unlike any he had seen before with no DNA and the ability to replicate at 300°C. Louis has come to the conclusion that the cells are extra-terrestrial in origin.
This find was similar to one by a NASA biologist that recently found living organisms INSIDE meteorites that fell to Earth.
Try growing a brain
buffboynick 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
NASA scientist Richard Hoover, whose findings were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Cosmology also found more evidence of extraterrestrial life in 2011. Maybe you can learn how to use "Google" and do a basic internet search. I understand it can be hard for believers in the MYTHICAL 'ape-man' though.
Maybe if you ev-LIE-utionists find the CHLCA people will listen lol. Or find out why Homo Sapiens havent "mutated" into a NEW species since we 1st emerged 200,000 years ago :)
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick "NASA scientist Richard Hoover, whose findings were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Cosmology also found more evidence of extraterrestrial life in 2011. " We were discussing Louis and his bogus Red Rain claims. You claim that Red Rain in India was panspermia when the evidence shows that it was lichen spores
Primitive life coming on meteors may have seeded earth, but that would not prove ancient astronauts, nor disprove evolution. In any event, you are wrong about Red Rain
AlanCFA 9 months ago
@AlanCFA
Once again NO....
If you goto Wikipedia and type in "Red Rain of Kerala" you can read the ENTIRE debate on this which involves multiple scientists all giving their "hypothesis" and NONE having proof its algae nor spores.
In fact only the Government of India says that!!! (according to Wikipedia)
and in 2006 Louis and Kumar published a paper in Astrophysics and Space Science (science journal) once again CONFIRMING Louis's original findings it was a case of PANSPERMIA__FACT
buffboynick 9 months ago