Do any of you watch or read the material before commenting? I love the people that think we will be transporting Rock back to earth. Or that we'll be mining Tritium, and saying it won't work because it has a half life of 6 years. The Fusion combination we will be using is Helium 3 and Deuterium. Do any of you realize the Massive energy requirments projected by 2050? We need to make the hard decisions, invest and move forward. Now!
There is one fundamental problem with producing the energy on the moon and then beaming it via microwaves to earth. As I understand there are 3 types of fusion. 1st Combining Deuterium with Tritium. 2nd Helium 3 with Deuterium (far less Radioactive waste) and 3rd combining Helium 3 with Helium 3 (perfect reaction. NO radioactive waste). The third is beyond us atm.So the 2nd is viable.Where are you going to get the Deuterium on the moon? It is an element that occures in bodies of water on Earth.
These guys are doing it wrong! You do not mine the Helium-3 and bring it back to earth to turn it into energy. You mine it on the moon, fuse it there, and send the energy as microwaves or infa red rays giving us 80% of the energy from the reaction. While this method seems like you are losing 20%, you might as well add in the cost of the trip to and from the moon. Its much easier to send the energy as waves rather than by shipments.
@hayden50 The modern aircraft (at least passenger and cargo) have a hull that will reflect these kinds of beams. As far as money is concerned, it would eventually be cheaper to manufacture the energy on the moon and send it via beams of energy rather than transporting the actual helium 3
The artificial sphere(planet) was brought here 6,000 years ago by a reptilian race and now who are now in the process of eliminating 90% of the earth's populace by 2029. These are the actual demons we all been waiting for.
i'd like to ask that why dont they produce their own helium 3 by fusing 2 nucleus of deuterium? coz from the way i see it they were using tritium and deuterium nucleus for the hydrogen nuclear fusion and would receive helium 4 as by product but if they fuse 2 deuterium together then they would get helium 3 instead. why dont they do it as 2 stage fusion? is there something that stop them from doing so? i hope this type of energy is our future.
@Obamain2012 Destroy the world's economy? You mean by waking up those ~300m people living off government oil money who don't work? By stimulating the economy in a way that nothing else has? Helium 3 isn't going to make plastic. Oil will still have a HUGE market, and with that kind of energy... Imagine the new opportunities for everyone across the world.
@NicenEasyuk@NicenEasyuk A lot of people have made comments regarding mankind destroying the moon if we mine Helium3. If we do mine Helium3 only a thin top layer of the surface is removed, This is then heated and the Helium 3 is extracted, the remaining Dust,soil or rock is then disposed back on the moons surface.
Eventually over thousands of years the surface will naturally absorb Helium3 once again form the suns rays..
Hopefully we would have long moved on by then to other outer planets.
@UFOBevy its quite obvious that moon has helium 3 as there is no atmosphere there... so why america still havent mined the moon? are the rumours true is there really aliens on moon mining helium 3 of thier own?
@UFOBevy I know that the obama administration wants nasa to now focus on putting people on mars by 2030 but are they still going to go through with building a lunar base for mining?
@becomemonkey The beautiful thing about the Obama administration is; It's only going to be 4 years. 2030 is a long ways away, and anyone could come in and change (no pun intended) the program.
Instead of building that obsolete space station in space, you guys should have built a mining facility on the moon. It's only 240 thousand miles to the moon. That's nothing. My Toyota has 307 thousand miles on it. I could have already been there and started back by now. What in the hell are you waiting for? And this time, don't let OPEC get their fat little greedy hands on it.
You've ALL missed the point. H3 is the Suns' By-product of Nuclear Fusion, (or so it is claimed) and must be pretty damn inert if it doesn't fuse in or at the surface of the Sun. "We need to generate Very High Temperatures" is another way of saying "We need to fleece all your money so that we can keep our highly paid jobs for achieving precisely Nothing over the last, what, 40 Years already?" JET project is an Energy Sink and a Money Black Hole. We need to learn to do the Simple things well, 1st
Yeah, lets strip mine the moon cos there's no-one lives there to object to it, so that's Okay, right?. WRONG. Anyone actually calculated the Energy Input?? (in the same way they forgot, when building Fission reactors). The Cost?. The Timescale? Seems to me like JET (who never like paying their bills until Years after they are due) is looking for an Excuse to continue to receive funding. How much have we wasted in Didcot already??. It takes the entire output of the local power station per pulse!!
@leeroybrowns Helium 3 only collects on the moon's surface, and I don't think you've quite grasped the concept of how large the moon is because even if they mined every last scrap of the stuff,1 million tons is nothing against the moon's total mass.
this fuel needs to be used on the MOON as a Manufacturing energy that can create the space crafts and living facilities on the moon which man can then launch from the Moon and go to other locations , h t t p: //news. softpedia. com/news/ Company-to-Create-Biosphere-on-the-Moon-107913. shtml , the idea that we can manufacture the space crafts on the Moon means we only need to transport man to and from earth so space craft manufacturing on the moon is a real possibility with this Fuel
there r theories that our first war as human beings where the conflict is about the moon or territory on the moon/space will b over this helium isotope fuel source. space war 1
Why go to the moon? Why not go to the source, the Sun and scoop out that stuff that spilling out away from the sun. Just have an orbiting vehicle go near the sun and capture all the He3 for like a year or so and have it return to earth. That way you don't need landing craft and mining machines and a moon launch vehicle.
H3 is the potential new industry America needs to create job growth and economic expansion. With water recently discovered on the moon, it could be a possibility. However, Obama has recently and very suddenly changed his mind about lunar exploration. American innovation is in rapid decline.
We need to go there! We really need to go there! We could colonise the moon at the same time! Omg I wanna live there! Do you think there'd be a high demand for People in Marketing? I'm going to be 30 when they go there. To think that my parents were born pre anyone going to the moon, and now this. I wonder what my children, and grandshildren will see.
@UFOBevy Yes we do understand how much power cities , countries , the word needs each day. But mining the moon for our own benefit is greedy and to be honest absolutely appalling.
Mining on the moon is not acceptable. No body owns the moon. If you then sell this helium 3 around the world as an energy source, who is to say that that small rock from the moon is yours. Its like saying you own the moon.
@ashbag1 "If you then sell this helium 3 around the world as an energy source, who is to say that that small rock from the moon is yours. Its like saying you own the moon."
They can say they own that small rock from the moon because they're the one's who actually went, got it and brought it back.
@ashbag1 We're talking about a substance found on a place that no one owns, the moon. The fossil was in a museum that is owned by someone, big differnce.
@Xai47 Exactly, you said it yourself, "no one owns the moon". So how can they sell something that isnt theirs. Just because something is not owned, doesnt mean you have the right to own it. If thats the case, im gonna say i own it, and people will have to pay me to mine on it. Its ridiculous.
@ashbag1 So I guess you already forgot my first comment. since no one owns the moon, then why shouldn't a substance from the moon belong to those who actually go there and bring the substance back? No offense, but if you really can't see the difference between that and just some random person saying they own it for no reason, then I don't think there's really anything else I can say.
@ashbag1 The point is that no one owns the moon, so we're not stealing it from anyone. If there was intelligent life on the moon than that would change everything, but there is no sign of any life at all there. Should we just not collect a material that could give the whole world clean, cheap power? If no one owns it then there is no reason why we shouldn't go get it. Do you understand what I'm saying now?
@ashbag1 And I understand that, but the problem is that making a profit is probably the only way somrthing this big is going to happen. It would be great if some billionare would conduct an operation like this to change the world for the better out of the goodness of there own heart but most likely that won't happen. The only way the world will get cheap, clean, realiable power is if someone can make a whole lot of money off it, although i wouldn't mind being wrong about this.
@Xai47 Yeah, thats what my point was. Although i know it would never happen, gotta have faith that someone out there will make a change for the better.
Great..Now we're Plannig to Destroy the Moon along with Mother Earth..Never mind Sea Levels..Vegetation and Animal Cycles..Including Women's own Period process..!! I'd say Stick with The MANY MANY alternatives we Already have in Alternative-Ecologic Sources of Energy..Like Solar..Magnetic..Eolic..Heat..And many More..Ohh..And Let's Not forget Nikola Tesla's Free Energy Inventions..Including the Wireless energy "Transformer"..!! Let's Think with Our Hearts..Not with Our Guts..!! Hari-Om ;)
Dont underestimate the complexity and investment needed for this. We need to first make the mining machinery, be able to deliver payloads to earth effectively, etc. We have no scarcity of coal and natural gas to have a demand for he3.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Um, yea strip mine the moon. Seems like a good idea, NOT. I really hope they don't fuck with the moon. Its the one thing that's keeping us alive. The moon is fine the way it is. We need to focus on "free energy", SOLAR power.
@RiVvenGuard wow you look what we've done to the Earth, I walk outside and I can breathe fine, we're all fine! And the moon is so large that even a million years of mining Helium 3 won't damage the moon.
@RiVvenGuard The one thing? lol... its not as though they're going to mine the whole moon away to nothing..ever watch Space 1999? I bet you do...lolz silly low I.Q person
@RiVvenGuard you dont bring the moon back to earth you process the soil and extract the helium. That will do nothing to the moon. 25 tons HE3 keeps america running for a year. There is an estimate of a million tons of HE3. If the world uses 500 tons a day its gonna last for 50.000 years. And we can get that number down with renewable energy, so maybe 52.000 years.
@RiVvenGuard but stuff from the moon is already in space so we dont have to get it there so it doesnt cost billions and its the 8th continent and its a complete blessing if we want to build a spacefaring community and we can use it to build space powerstations to push spaceships to near the speed of light.
@RiVvenGuard no, its an amazing idea, one space ship full of helium 3 is years worth fuel for the entire earth, not to mention what a perfect natural shipyard the moon is
MIT also studied numerous other proposals for clean energy alternatives. From memory this is a ball park figure for what you propose. I dont know if they ever published these figures but they did study many alternatives. Do you know how expensive in fuel it is to get even modest payloads to the moon? You are talking massive cost over massive time spans. We are bathed in energy from above & below every second, why use a resource so hard to access, when it may be far more valuable in the future.
It will cost 90% of the energy obtained to set up , mine , compress & return Helium 3 to earth.That is we will waste the energy equivalent of 90% of the fuel we extract. Helium 3 is worth more were it is as an existing source of energy for space exploration when the human race is more enlightened and less materialistic. Solar, geothermal are renewables and polution free. We should be spending the funds for this venture making them viable.
Fully agree with what you are saying on cap and trade. We have land clearing legislation in this country that is stealing farmers land & locking it up as a so called carbon sink. If a farmer reduces the intensity of farming on his land & gives some paddocks a spell from intentsive agriculture either because of drought or a glutt in the markt, any native vegitation no matter how small becomes protected & that land is lost. We have had over 500 suicides on farms as a result since this legislation.
I am in Australia. We have world leading Hot Rock Geothermal technology & a plant functioning now. ETS is all about the new world order. A global problem will need a global solution, global taxation. Invent the problem & you can form global government, take away national soverienty, land ownership, democratic representation, overide constitutional rights. Basically what the UN is trying to do would be Hitler or Starlins wet dream & a nightmare for the rest of humanity.
@MASSIF101 doubt it dude. We went to war in the middle east just to get fuel. Russia lost the war in the 1970s against the mujahadeen and neither have ever been to the moon. at least we still have technology that can go there.
Yes I see that but did you look at the MIT studies into geothermal energy. Its a hugh untapped source of reliable immission free polution free reliable base load energy. What I am saying is that H3 is a more valuable resource because of where it is. If we explore into space or colonise the moon we will not need to transport energy out of earths atmosphere to fuel exploration. The amount of energy saved by not having to get it free of earths gravity is hugh.
The largest EGS project in the world is a 25 megawatt demonstration plant developed in the Cooper Basin, Australia. The Cooper Basin has the potential to generate 5,00010,000 MW.
Hydrothermal geothermal, are expected to be baseload resources which produce power 24 hours a day like a fossil plant. The well is expected to have a life span of 20 to 30 years until the temp drops 10 degrees Celsius. After 50 to 300 years it recovers once again.
If helium 3 is on the moon in vast quantities because the moon as little atmosphere, then it here on Earth. Millions of years ago, the Earth had little atmosphere and the Helium from the sun hit Earth in vast amounts too. Another thought, the transportation of Helium from the moon would cost so much that there would be little gain other than money. An modern example would be up to 90% of the cost of a tomato at your grocery store is transportation. Just a thought
People who can only think in fusion have only one goal: To make fusion possible. Their motives ar far away from solving energy problems. If one has only a hammer, every problem is a nail.
The entire H3 issue is a false motive. There is enough energy in earths heat. A few million times more than all of the H3 on moon could provide. One year of the accessible heat in the earths crust could provide electrical power for us for about 1000 years. And the extraction is cheaper than any other form.
Anyway, extracting H3 from the moon to use it on earth is probably the most ineffricient way to extract energy.
if mining only the moon you are correct as less is deposited each year than we would use. However the moon only catches 1 one trillionith of the amount of solar wind escaping the sun at any second. Within the 10,000 years of fuel we would have (giving that the human population doesn't go much over 10bill and all are living an American lifestyle) we can develop satellites that would directly gather He3 from the solar wind itself.
i think it could probably be done if america wanted to invest money into it. but im guessing that they would rather use all the oil on earth that they invested trillions of dollars into aye
yarn there not broke ... when the people they borrowed off ask them to pay back there debt, they'll just blow them up. (no army in the world can compete)
they should focus on anything and everything to do with space. The Catholic Gregorian calendar screwed up the way we think of ourselfs and the world around us.
Sorry it was kinda a out of context rant. There calendar has us whorshiping Money/Fame witch Extremeley slows down the process of the study of Science/Creationism/Life
Although very very usefull transport of helium-3 is going to be tricky, they are going to have to create craft capable of transporting huge quantities of it across space and back to earth. The reason why i say this will be tricky is because first they will have to create mass ammounts of them and fly them all to the moon and then of course bringing them back with much more mass is another problem because it will probably require a lot of fuel to get back to earth as well.
I get what you're saying, but no one really owns the earth. Humans just live here and decided to burn the fossil fuels. I guess finders keepers... Sorta.
Half the world lives in poverty because of a certain "super power" that controls through war and propaganda most of the oil in the world.
This "super power" are going to be the ones who can afford to send people there to help run their country. They're not going to put all that effort in doing that and converting it to Helium 3 back on earth then share that with lesser financially stable country's are they.
We should focus here on Earth a means for another alternative energy source.
Helium-3 is a clean energy though and there is no other energy that requires little work to extract or produce on earth so it looks like the moon is the next mining spot, probably in the hundreds of years to come too we will have engineers capable of designing a mining space craft which can orbit saturn or jupitor and extract energy from their too
Man and Women need to pursue a new form of power. Not just a physical power either, more... a gnosis of beingness... Not a need to make others perpetually submit, life should not be a boxing ring forever... A world of the powerful and the powerless... Cannot we give to those who need? Cannot we teach others to use their power, a gift latent even in the bugs in your kitchen???? Come-on... GIVE A LITTLE LOVE YOU F..RS
Watch out America, China, Russia and Iran all have, 'Sizzlers' aircraft carrier destroyer missles that fly at mock-3, the US Navy does not have an antidote after two years,,,
The question is about botteling. Botteling can occur successfully if you use the charge itself to fotm teh bottle that protects the craft from damage via crazy neutrons..
Finally there was "gold" in the moon!!, and what class of gold, 4millions$ per Kg of He3. Gold is just as excrement compared with that. Super the video.
What say the astronaut from 5:26 to 5:37 ? I'd like to translate it. Thanks.
At the end they speak of the first nation on the moon to start controlling earth's energy supply.
I so hope, that I will live to see this happen, but It would make me really sad, if the nations could not get a fucking grip, and cooperate with each other to achieve this common goal.
We have problems as a planet, why can't we solve them as a planet? No, but here the first people already start weeping about their nation being obliterate in the future because another one pulls ahead.
the Chinese will be on the moon long before anybody else.. the US is gonna be reduced to next has been country thanks to Bush and his corrupt greedy wealthy elite buddies
this is their plan for alien intervention - by us literally almost tearing our planet to shreds and then making the world think that the aliens who have been watching over us wish to save us because of our beautiful design (pukes).
Helium three bubbles from the deep sea! And he is produced by fields of green crops
JonThm 1 week ago
Do any of you watch or read the material before commenting? I love the people that think we will be transporting Rock back to earth. Or that we'll be mining Tritium, and saying it won't work because it has a half life of 6 years. The Fusion combination we will be using is Helium 3 and Deuterium. Do any of you realize the Massive energy requirments projected by 2050? We need to make the hard decisions, invest and move forward. Now!
Purluc 1 week ago
There is one fundamental problem with producing the energy on the moon and then beaming it via microwaves to earth. As I understand there are 3 types of fusion. 1st Combining Deuterium with Tritium. 2nd Helium 3 with Deuterium (far less Radioactive waste) and 3rd combining Helium 3 with Helium 3 (perfect reaction. NO radioactive waste). The third is beyond us atm.So the 2nd is viable.Where are you going to get the Deuterium on the moon? It is an element that occures in bodies of water on Earth.
Purluc 1 week ago
These guys are doing it wrong! You do not mine the Helium-3 and bring it back to earth to turn it into energy. You mine it on the moon, fuse it there, and send the energy as microwaves or infa red rays giving us 80% of the energy from the reaction. While this method seems like you are losing 20%, you might as well add in the cost of the trip to and from the moon. Its much easier to send the energy as waves rather than by shipments.
PaperMoneyShow 1 month ago
@PaperMoneyShow i have a question : what happens to an aircraft that fly through these microwaves & infrared rays?
hayden50 1 month ago
@hayden50 The modern aircraft (at least passenger and cargo) have a hull that will reflect these kinds of beams. As far as money is concerned, it would eventually be cheaper to manufacture the energy on the moon and send it via beams of energy rather than transporting the actual helium 3
PaperMoneyShow 1 month ago
I hope we can soon go to jupiter for helium 3 in the future. After we mine the moon for it
crossvariation 1 month ago
TOO FUCKING BAD OBAMA THE CUNT CANCELLED ALL OF THIS!!!
Designandrew 1 month ago
@Designandrew Ya muslims are not really into space. : (
I was pissed when NYC got a Space Shuttle and we (Houston) did not. Playing politics with our lives, thanks Kenya's finest!
txfirehawk 1 month ago
@Designandrew The US is broke you didn't read the memo?
Maybe if Washington stop creating new wars abroad there will be some money left for the space program.
hashimirasama 1 month ago in playlist Autres vidéos de UFOBevy
name of company?
123poi7 2 months ago
thanks my aero space group needed it thx
julesterboom77 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4:32 It looks like the deathstar in there.
i smell foreshadowing
perjuchan 4 months ago
Comment removed
perjuchan 4 months ago
Access: The Lion Sleep No More-Moon Control
The artificial sphere(planet) was brought here 6,000 years ago by a reptilian race and now who are now in the process of eliminating 90% of the earth's populace by 2029. These are the actual demons we all been waiting for.
DavidLKaas 4 months ago
@DavidLKaas SMH. You people will never stop will you?......
samysasy419 4 months ago
so much knowledge so little time..
CYRAPHYM 5 months ago
i'd like to ask that why dont they produce their own helium 3 by fusing 2 nucleus of deuterium? coz from the way i see it they were using tritium and deuterium nucleus for the hydrogen nuclear fusion and would receive helium 4 as by product but if they fuse 2 deuterium together then they would get helium 3 instead. why dont they do it as 2 stage fusion? is there something that stop them from doing so? i hope this type of energy is our future.
siddepoo 5 months ago
@siddepoo yes radioaktivity and the meer nonexistance of tritcium on eart or anywhere near.
deccno 3 months ago
@Obamain2012 Destroy the world's economy? You mean by waking up those ~300m people living off government oil money who don't work? By stimulating the economy in a way that nothing else has? Helium 3 isn't going to make plastic. Oil will still have a HUGE market, and with that kind of energy... Imagine the new opportunities for everyone across the world.
TumisHumis 5 months ago
cmon problem is you need to create the heat idiots
bkfilipi 7 months ago
would taking mass amounts of rock from the moon and putting it on earth increase earths mass? If it does, would it increase earths gravity?
NicenEasyuk 7 months ago
@NicenEasyuk @NicenEasyuk A lot of people have made comments regarding mankind destroying the moon if we mine Helium3. If we do mine Helium3 only a thin top layer of the surface is removed, This is then heated and the Helium 3 is extracted, the remaining Dust,soil or rock is then disposed back on the moons surface.
Eventually over thousands of years the surface will naturally absorb Helium3 once again form the suns rays..
Hopefully we would have long moved on by then to other outer planets.
UFOBevy 7 months ago 4
@UFOBevy its quite obvious that moon has helium 3 as there is no atmosphere there... so why america still havent mined the moon? are the rumours true is there really aliens on moon mining helium 3 of thier own?
ridemegirlrideme 2 months ago
@ridemegirlrideme the US currently make helium 3 for their own and they consume roughly 60,000 liters of it every year.
MyZoosh 2 months ago
@MyZoosh they only make 8000 liters a year
xxpuaraxx 2 weeks ago
@NicenEasyuk Millions of tones of crap comes in the atmosphere every year. And that does increase mass and gravity but very slowly.
wistals2deniks 5 months ago
@UFOBevy I know that the obama administration wants nasa to now focus on putting people on mars by 2030 but are they still going to go through with building a lunar base for mining?
becomemonkey 7 months ago
@becomemonkey The beautiful thing about the Obama administration is; It's only going to be 4 years. 2030 is a long ways away, and anyone could come in and change (no pun intended) the program.
TumisHumis 5 months ago
@TumisHumis cool, anyways moon or mars i still think its cool
becomemonkey 5 months ago
Instead of building that obsolete space station in space, you guys should have built a mining facility on the moon. It's only 240 thousand miles to the moon. That's nothing. My Toyota has 307 thousand miles on it. I could have already been there and started back by now. What in the hell are you waiting for? And this time, don't let OPEC get their fat little greedy hands on it.
magprob 8 months ago
You've ALL missed the point. H3 is the Suns' By-product of Nuclear Fusion, (or so it is claimed) and must be pretty damn inert if it doesn't fuse in or at the surface of the Sun. "We need to generate Very High Temperatures" is another way of saying "We need to fleece all your money so that we can keep our highly paid jobs for achieving precisely Nothing over the last, what, 40 Years already?" JET project is an Energy Sink and a Money Black Hole. We need to learn to do the Simple things well, 1st
Tornfreedom 8 months ago
Yeah, lets strip mine the moon cos there's no-one lives there to object to it, so that's Okay, right?. WRONG. Anyone actually calculated the Energy Input?? (in the same way they forgot, when building Fission reactors). The Cost?. The Timescale? Seems to me like JET (who never like paying their bills until Years after they are due) is looking for an Excuse to continue to receive funding. How much have we wasted in Didcot already??. It takes the entire output of the local power station per pulse!!
Tornfreedom 8 months ago
@leeroybrowns True that, but I'd still like to see manned space exploration take on a more practical value than mere "national pride."
1st503rdSGT 9 months ago
@leeroybrowns Helium 3 only collects on the moon's surface, and I don't think you've quite grasped the concept of how large the moon is because even if they mined every last scrap of the stuff,1 million tons is nothing against the moon's total mass.
1st503rdSGT 9 months ago
nerds!
zeezoomzoom 9 months ago
I can't believe they want to nuke the moon. That's really ignorant.
CyberDeadly 9 months ago
The moon is fine as it is...geothermal energy is the way to go.
mylifeispointless 9 months ago
Let the war begin
superinfinite88 9 months ago
tritium has a half-life of six years. there's not much left to mine, no matter how long the solar wind has been blowing.
finesserequired 10 months ago
commonest, you mean most common?
VTOLAircraftMad 10 months ago
Y don't we just change the wall every 5 years and use this technology?
Georgeqaws 10 months ago
@Georgeqaws Because it still is in its' infancy and they need 100,000 times the output to be viable!!!.
They don't even know if this er technology is viable as it is, let alone scaled up. Waste of money.
Tornfreedom 8 months ago
Mass effect-like music in a video about Helium-3, the fuel used in the game!
TheMajorStranger 11 months ago
@UFOBevy
treehugger*com/solar-thermal-power-bb001.jpg the red squares represent eu and the world
bbkingdom 11 months ago
lol with trentemoller moon in the background :)
solaninshadows 11 months ago
wat about helium 2 i know wat helium 1 is lol
jwilliams575 1 year ago
Mining the moon always reminds me of that one scene in the movie The Time Machine, where the Moon is cracking....
GuitarxWolf 1 year ago
this fuel needs to be used on the MOON as a Manufacturing energy that can create the space crafts and living facilities on the moon which man can then launch from the Moon and go to other locations , h t t p: //news. softpedia. com/news/ Company-to-Create-Biosphere-on-the-Moon-107913. shtml , the idea that we can manufacture the space crafts on the Moon means we only need to transport man to and from earth so space craft manufacturing on the moon is a real possibility with this Fuel
TireLift 1 year ago
there r theories that our first war as human beings where the conflict is about the moon or territory on the moon/space will b over this helium isotope fuel source. space war 1
whatabeast94 1 year ago
Maybe it'll buy our race some time. We have nothing to lose at this point!
ratpatrolxxx 1 year ago
Somebody told me the 1H-11B fusion reaction is better than the D-3He or 3He-3He reaction. If that were so, why would we need to mine Helium-3?
kgunby 1 year ago
cold fusion.
strongnoob 1 year ago
how do you contain helium3
msangelareid 1 year ago
@msangelareid
Helium 3 can be handled and stored the same way liquid helium is.
UFOBevy 1 year ago
OMFG, this set of videos has only 13503 &7327 view... WTF it's the freaking plan to save the world
moonus111 1 year ago
Y not make a space station that can capture the helium 3 from the solar winds?
Amishprn86 1 year ago
@UFOBevy Its all about magnets, believe it or not we r already using them and its been public knowledge for 50 years.
Amishprn86 1 year ago
Why go to the moon? Why not go to the source, the Sun and scoop out that stuff that spilling out away from the sun. Just have an orbiting vehicle go near the sun and capture all the He3 for like a year or so and have it return to earth. That way you don't need landing craft and mining machines and a moon launch vehicle.
cyprezz 1 year ago
H3 is the potential new industry America needs to create job growth and economic expansion. With water recently discovered on the moon, it could be a possibility. However, Obama has recently and very suddenly changed his mind about lunar exploration. American innovation is in rapid decline.
infernalhammer 1 year ago
We need to go there! We really need to go there! We could colonise the moon at the same time! Omg I wanna live there! Do you think there'd be a high demand for People in Marketing? I'm going to be 30 when they go there. To think that my parents were born pre anyone going to the moon, and now this. I wonder what my children, and grandshildren will see.
mickeymoo26 1 year ago
@mickeymoo26 LMAO yeah, im sure the people who colonize the moon are going to be searching high and low for an expert in marketing
sitesbuiltnow 1 year ago
@sitesbuiltnow ahahahaha you never know!
mickeymoo26 1 year ago
let's go get it!!!! send the marines
sylmrgalindo 1 year ago
@UFOBevy Yes we do understand how much power cities , countries , the word needs each day. But mining the moon for our own benefit is greedy and to be honest absolutely appalling.
ashbag1 1 year ago
Mining on the moon is not acceptable. No body owns the moon. If you then sell this helium 3 around the world as an energy source, who is to say that that small rock from the moon is yours. Its like saying you own the moon.
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 "If you then sell this helium 3 around the world as an energy source, who is to say that that small rock from the moon is yours. Its like saying you own the moon."
They can say they own that small rock from the moon because they're the one's who actually went, got it and brought it back.
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 Does that mean i can go to a museum and take a world famous fossil and say its mine? Purely because i went there and got it?
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 We're talking about a substance found on a place that no one owns, the moon. The fossil was in a museum that is owned by someone, big differnce.
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 Exactly, you said it yourself, "no one owns the moon". So how can they sell something that isnt theirs. Just because something is not owned, doesnt mean you have the right to own it. If thats the case, im gonna say i own it, and people will have to pay me to mine on it. Its ridiculous.
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 So I guess you already forgot my first comment. since no one owns the moon, then why shouldn't a substance from the moon belong to those who actually go there and bring the substance back? No offense, but if you really can't see the difference between that and just some random person saying they own it for no reason, then I don't think there's really anything else I can say.
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 You keep changing sides. Im saying that no one owns the moon therefore no one should make profit from what may be found on the moon.
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 How am I changing sides?
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 The whole idea of not owning the moon, yet selling pieces of it for personal profit.
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 The point is that no one owns the moon, so we're not stealing it from anyone. If there was intelligent life on the moon than that would change everything, but there is no sign of any life at all there. Should we just not collect a material that could give the whole world clean, cheap power? If no one owns it then there is no reason why we shouldn't go get it. Do you understand what I'm saying now?
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 Of course i understand, and in part i agree with you. But i dont like the idea of a company making profit from it.
ashbag1 1 year ago
@ashbag1 And I understand that, but the problem is that making a profit is probably the only way somrthing this big is going to happen. It would be great if some billionare would conduct an operation like this to change the world for the better out of the goodness of there own heart but most likely that won't happen. The only way the world will get cheap, clean, realiable power is if someone can make a whole lot of money off it, although i wouldn't mind being wrong about this.
Xai47 1 year ago
@Xai47 Yeah, thats what my point was. Although i know it would never happen, gotta have faith that someone out there will make a change for the better.
ashbag1 1 year ago
geothermal does so make pollution duh volcanoes spew tons of poisons in the air
FishEggeez 1 year ago
mineable grade is something like 5ppb, good luck with that!
Kable3141 1 year ago
Great..Now we're Plannig to Destroy the Moon along with Mother Earth..Never mind Sea Levels..Vegetation and Animal Cycles..Including Women's own Period process..!! I'd say Stick with The MANY MANY alternatives we Already have in Alternative-Ecologic Sources of Energy..Like Solar..Magnetic..Eolic..Heat..And many More..Ohh..And Let's Not forget Nikola Tesla's Free Energy Inventions..Including the Wireless energy "Transformer"..!! Let's Think with Our Hearts..Not with Our Guts..!! Hari-Om ;)
ZatChitAnanda 1 year ago
With this fuel tech we could be able to build spaceships worthy of flying farther and farther with the advancement of mining tech
V340E419 2 years ago
china has bought the moon
matchbox555 2 years ago 15
Dont underestimate the complexity and investment needed for this. We need to first make the mining machinery, be able to deliver payloads to earth effectively, etc. We have no scarcity of coal and natural gas to have a demand for he3.
Ramshobraja 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Um, yea strip mine the moon. Seems like a good idea, NOT. I really hope they don't fuck with the moon. Its the one thing that's keeping us alive. The moon is fine the way it is. We need to focus on "free energy", SOLAR power.
RiVvenGuard 2 years ago
@RiVvenGuard wow you look what we've done to the Earth, I walk outside and I can breathe fine, we're all fine! And the moon is so large that even a million years of mining Helium 3 won't damage the moon.
KingVerac 1 year ago
@RiVvenGuard The one thing? lol... its not as though they're going to mine the whole moon away to nothing..ever watch Space 1999? I bet you do...lolz silly low I.Q person
OtagoMark 1 year ago
@RiVvenGuard you dont bring the moon back to earth you process the soil and extract the helium. That will do nothing to the moon. 25 tons HE3 keeps america running for a year. There is an estimate of a million tons of HE3. If the world uses 500 tons a day its gonna last for 50.000 years. And we can get that number down with renewable energy, so maybe 52.000 years.
cassius969 1 year ago
@cassius969 not to mention Helium 3 is clean unlike fossil fuel
Methyll 1 year ago
@RiVvenGuard they probably going to do it anyway
Methyll 1 year ago
@RiVvenGuard check the prices of some state-of-the-art solar panels, and let me know if it's still "Free energy"
TumisHumis 1 year ago
@RiVvenGuard but stuff from the moon is already in space so we dont have to get it there so it doesnt cost billions and its the 8th continent and its a complete blessing if we want to build a spacefaring community and we can use it to build space powerstations to push spaceships to near the speed of light.
happyrobot42 11 months ago
@RiVvenGuard no, its an amazing idea, one space ship full of helium 3 is years worth fuel for the entire earth, not to mention what a perfect natural shipyard the moon is
OrogDeMalfur 10 months ago
What is your 90% maths,,
One load of this stuff will power the Earth for a year.
Once we have the crafts that can get to the Moon, we can launch them back via a small burst.
H3 May save our planet..or sit back and wait for the oil riots.
This is our last hope of a clean fuel.
btw .Cap & trade is a scam!
UFOBevy 2 years ago
MIT also studied numerous other proposals for clean energy alternatives. From memory this is a ball park figure for what you propose. I dont know if they ever published these figures but they did study many alternatives. Do you know how expensive in fuel it is to get even modest payloads to the moon? You are talking massive cost over massive time spans. We are bathed in energy from above & below every second, why use a resource so hard to access, when it may be far more valuable in the future.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
It will cost 90% of the energy obtained to set up , mine , compress & return Helium 3 to earth.That is we will waste the energy equivalent of 90% of the fuel we extract. Helium 3 is worth more were it is as an existing source of energy for space exploration when the human race is more enlightened and less materialistic. Solar, geothermal are renewables and polution free. We should be spending the funds for this venture making them viable.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
Cap & Trade.. Worlds biggest con.
They nearly got away with it. they still may
UFOBevy 2 years ago
Fully agree with what you are saying on cap and trade. We have land clearing legislation in this country that is stealing farmers land & locking it up as a so called carbon sink. If a farmer reduces the intensity of farming on his land & gives some paddocks a spell from intentsive agriculture either because of drought or a glutt in the markt, any native vegitation no matter how small becomes protected & that land is lost. We have had over 500 suicides on farms as a result since this legislation.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
May I ask where you are from Chris?
Agriculture farming has been sh@t on by our goverment (UK) in the last 30 years.
But Helium3 may save our ass.
If we get there first.. sad to say.
UFOBevy 2 years ago
I am in Australia. We have world leading Hot Rock Geothermal technology & a plant functioning now. ETS is all about the new world order. A global problem will need a global solution, global taxation. Invent the problem & you can form global government, take away national soverienty, land ownership, democratic representation, overide constitutional rights. Basically what the UN is trying to do would be Hitler or Starlins wet dream & a nightmare for the rest of humanity.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
UK ain't gettin to the moon anytime soon mate, however much we need it.
when helium 3 is eventually used as a fuel, we're probably going to be gettin it from russia or china
MASSIF101 2 years ago
@MASSIF101 doubt it dude. We went to war in the middle east just to get fuel. Russia lost the war in the 1970s against the mujahadeen and neither have ever been to the moon. at least we still have technology that can go there.
KingVerac 1 year ago
We have not got much choice Chris, we go for this or sit back and watch the oil run out, Nuclear?
Look into the China,Russia and Indian space race..
They are going for it m8
UFOBevy 2 years ago
Yes I see that but did you look at the MIT studies into geothermal energy. Its a hugh untapped source of reliable immission free polution free reliable base load energy. What I am saying is that H3 is a more valuable resource because of where it is. If we explore into space or colonise the moon we will not need to transport energy out of earths atmosphere to fuel exploration. The amount of energy saved by not having to get it free of earths gravity is hugh.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
I am looking into geothermal energy Chris.
Thanks
UFOBevy 2 years ago
Look up "Enhanced geothermal system" in Wiki.
The largest EGS project in the world is a 25 megawatt demonstration plant developed in the Cooper Basin, Australia. The Cooper Basin has the potential to generate 5,00010,000 MW.
Hydrothermal geothermal, are expected to be baseload resources which produce power 24 hours a day like a fossil plant. The well is expected to have a life span of 20 to 30 years until the temp drops 10 degrees Celsius. After 50 to 300 years it recovers once again.
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
@UFOBevy Much Much Better and Cleaner than "Helium-3 Madness"..!!!
ZatChitAnanda 1 year ago
If helium 3 is on the moon in vast quantities because the moon as little atmosphere, then it here on Earth. Millions of years ago, the Earth had little atmosphere and the Helium from the sun hit Earth in vast amounts too. Another thought, the transportation of Helium from the moon would cost so much that there would be little gain other than money. An modern example would be up to 90% of the cost of a tomato at your grocery store is transportation. Just a thought
arclight777 2 years ago
Great! Now we're gonna have H3 trapped in our atmosphere and AL Gore is gonna get another Nobel Peace Prize.
ronniestuff08 2 years ago
Today that future has begun.
frankmenges 2 years ago
People who can only think in fusion have only one goal: To make fusion possible. Their motives ar far away from solving energy problems. If one has only a hammer, every problem is a nail.
WolYou 2 years ago
but we have all the energy source on earth . its called WATER ! HUMAN GREED MAKES HUMANS STUPID!
PLISKEN12 2 years ago
The entire H3 issue is a false motive. There is enough energy in earths heat. A few million times more than all of the H3 on moon could provide. One year of the accessible heat in the earths crust could provide electrical power for us for about 1000 years. And the extraction is cheaper than any other form.
Anyway, extracting H3 from the moon to use it on earth is probably the most ineffricient way to extract energy.
WolYou 2 years ago
Helium 3 is a fossil fuel, lol
javonoUTube 2 years ago
wolyou ae you sure helium 3 is a fossil fuel??lol
jeffsemore 2 years ago
he is a fuckign fool to say that lol
remix1on1 2 years ago
get the heat of the earth and turn it into power. thats much cheaper and more reliable than mining the moon.
WolYou 2 years ago
Also helium 3 is a fossil fuel :)
WolYou 2 years ago
if mining only the moon you are correct as less is deposited each year than we would use. However the moon only catches 1 one trillionith of the amount of solar wind escaping the sun at any second. Within the 10,000 years of fuel we would have (giving that the human population doesn't go much over 10bill and all are living an American lifestyle) we can develop satellites that would directly gather He3 from the solar wind itself.
TreyNitrotoluene 2 years ago
are you sure about that?
remix1on1 2 years ago
Ummm, no, its an isotope of Helium, Fossil fules have carbon in them, jackass.
MOVIMasta 2 years ago
Can my car run on this shit :D ?
Vleesball 2 years ago
i think it could probably be done if america wanted to invest money into it. but im guessing that they would rather use all the oil on earth that they invested trillions of dollars into aye
dnbgolda 2 years ago
what money :p ?
i thought america was broke :p
Vleesball 2 years ago
yarn there not broke ... when the people they borrowed off ask them to pay back there debt, they'll just blow them up. (no army in the world can compete)
dnbgolda 2 years ago
You're saying america army > asian army?
america couldnt even win in VC = )
Vleesball 2 years ago
yeah but im saying no one could ever attack american soil therefor no one could ever beat them. (no army in the world can compete)
dnbgolda 2 years ago
pearl harbor.. nuff said = )
Vleesball 2 years ago
keep thinking that. We are losing our ecomnoic power and China is growing strong. They can take us over one day.
z3r006 2 years ago
They didnt have to. Their plan wasnt to beat the VC just to stop the RED Movement. Vietnam was just a pawn, they could care less if they lost or won.
z3r006 2 years ago
It's a HUGE energy source. Thanks for sharing *****/favorite
mylittleponies322 2 years ago
It's also going to take a huge amount of money to pull this off. Ring any bells?
UFOBevy 2 years ago
yeah but it will make a shit load of money
dnbgolda 2 years ago
Indeed it will
UFOBevy 2 years ago
they should focus on anything and everything to do with space. The Catholic Gregorian calendar screwed up the way we think of ourselfs and the world around us.
StepinR 2 years ago
what?
UFOBevy 2 years ago
Sorry it was kinda a out of context rant. There calendar has us whorshiping Money/Fame witch Extremeley slows down the process of the study of Science/Creationism/Life
this is just my own opinion
StepinR 2 years ago
Although very very usefull transport of helium-3 is going to be tricky, they are going to have to create craft capable of transporting huge quantities of it across space and back to earth. The reason why i say this will be tricky is because first they will have to create mass ammounts of them and fly them all to the moon and then of course bringing them back with much more mass is another problem because it will probably require a lot of fuel to get back to earth as well.
Cozzi0 2 years ago
Somehow i don't feel comfortable with us going to the Moon and strip mining it as an energy source to fuel our planet.
No one owns the moon, who has the right to go and stake their claim on it?
solarwinter86 2 years ago
I get what you're saying, but no one really owns the earth. Humans just live here and decided to burn the fossil fuels. I guess finders keepers... Sorta.
AppleMassacre 2 years ago
Half the world lives in poverty because of a certain "super power" that controls through war and propaganda most of the oil in the world.
This "super power" are going to be the ones who can afford to send people there to help run their country. They're not going to put all that effort in doing that and converting it to Helium 3 back on earth then share that with lesser financially stable country's are they.
We should focus here on Earth a means for another alternative energy source.
solarwinter86 2 years ago
Helium-3 is a clean energy though and there is no other energy that requires little work to extract or produce on earth so it looks like the moon is the next mining spot, probably in the hundreds of years to come too we will have engineers capable of designing a mining space craft which can orbit saturn or jupitor and extract energy from their too
Cozzi0 2 years ago 2
Nasa or which ever space program centre gets there first should be able to claim it as theirs
Cozzi0 2 years ago
Stop being such dead beats... Follow Ron Paul... Give money to him. THE CLOCK IS TICKING 11:59.......
PX2012 2 years ago
Man and Women need to pursue a new form of power. Not just a physical power either, more... a gnosis of beingness... Not a need to make others perpetually submit, life should not be a boxing ring forever... A world of the powerful and the powerless... Cannot we give to those who need? Cannot we teach others to use their power, a gift latent even in the bugs in your kitchen???? Come-on... GIVE A LITTLE LOVE YOU F..RS
PX2012 2 years ago
Watch out America, China, Russia and Iran all have, 'Sizzlers' aircraft carrier destroyer missles that fly at mock-3, the US Navy does not have an antidote after two years,,,
PX2012 2 years ago
I gave you a thumbs up.. It is true
UFOBevy 2 years ago
The question is about botteling. Botteling can occur successfully if you use the charge itself to fotm teh bottle that protects the craft from damage via crazy neutrons..
PX2012 2 years ago
Perhaps if it wer able to be fused with Helium Three's Deturium, the reaction would heat even a highly amplified magno-electric charge(s)??
PX2012 2 years ago
Could an electro-magnetic charge get hot enoght to fuse ataoms?
PX2012 2 years ago
no ;)
UFOBevy 2 years ago
This is what NASA should be focusing on right now, not the space station which is for all practical purpose a white elephant.
OperationCrossroad 2 years ago
Finally there was "gold" in the moon!!, and what class of gold, 4millions$ per Kg of He3. Gold is just as excrement compared with that. Super the video.
What say the astronaut from 5:26 to 5:37 ? I'd like to translate it. Thanks.
AZURA888 2 years ago
At the end they speak of the first nation on the moon to start controlling earth's energy supply.
I so hope, that I will live to see this happen, but It would make me really sad, if the nations could not get a fucking grip, and cooperate with each other to achieve this common goal.
We have problems as a planet, why can't we solve them as a planet? No, but here the first people already start weeping about their nation being obliterate in the future because another one pulls ahead.
Spastb00n 2 years ago
the Chinese will be on the moon long before anybody else.. the US is gonna be reduced to next has been country thanks to Bush and his corrupt greedy wealthy elite buddies
victor2cutube 2 years ago
you are right its quite sad isnt it?
LaddieGalicia 2 years ago 2
this is their plan for alien intervention - by us literally almost tearing our planet to shreds and then making the world think that the aliens who have been watching over us wish to save us because of our beautiful design (pukes).
agreeableviews816 3 years ago
what?
UFOBevy 2 years ago
Oh, nothing. Just rambling.
agreeableviews816 2 years ago
so this is why nasa wants to go back to the moon
shinjide213 3 years ago 3
this video should have 200k views wtf
zrodn001 3 years ago 2